Area 2

AREAS NEEDING IMPROVEMENT

1. Publication of manuals, workbooks, modules, and other teaching materials can enhance the teaching -learning process and boost the performance of the faculty as experts in their field of specialization, but less evidence could be found in the program under surveyed.

2. Very few faculty, especially those handling major courses have instructional materials produced and solely for classroom use and are not evaluated by the college or University Instructional Materials and Production Board (or any committee/board of similar in nature)

3. Paper presentations in national and international conferences/fora enhances the professionalism of the faculty, but is not ventured by the majority of the faculty.

4. Minimal number of faculty are conducting research activities and publication of their outputs is rarely done.

5. Some books and other references materials indicated in the syllabi are not of recent edition.

6. Faculty consultation schedule is not reflected in the teaching load.

7. No studies have been conducted on the satisfaction level of the faculty and employees with their compensation and rewards.

8. Integration of Gender and Development (GAD) in the syllabus is not evident.