PARAMETER F: ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT FOR EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTION

SYSTEM - INPUTS AND PROCESSES

S.1. The institution has policies on:

S.1.1. substitution or special arrangements whenever a teacher is leave on or absent;

Substitution guideline is indicated on the Faculty Manual page 10.

S.1.2. giving awards and or recognition for faculty and students with outstanding achievements; and

Policies on awards is indicated on the Faculty Manual page 24-33.

S.1.3. supervision, monitoring and evaluation of faculty performance.

IMPLEMENTATION

I.1. The institution implements rules on the attendance of the faculty in their respective classes and other academic related activities.

Guidelines of faculty teaching load is indicated on the Faculty Manual page 6-11.

I.2. Dialogues are regularly conducted between the administration and the:

I.2.1. faculty; and

I.2.2. students.

I.3. Quality instruction is assured through the following Strategies:

I.3.1. conducting seminar/workshop on syllabi making;

I.3.2. holding workshops on test construction;

I.3.3. conducting competency assessment;

Webinar workshop on Syllabus, TOS and Rubric making.

I.3. Quality instruction is assured through the following Strategies:

I.3.4. supervisory visits of classes;

I.3. Quality instruction is assured through the following Strategies:

I.3.6. requiring consultations between students and faculty;

I.3. Quality instruction is assured through the following Strategies:

I.3.7. conducting studies on academic performance of students; and

The Department of Tourism Management in collaboration with the BSTM student Research in Tourism Class student is currently conducting a research study on the performance of OJT students.

I.3. Quality instruction is assured through the following Strategies:

I.3.8. providing opportunities for the participation of the faculty in in-service activities.

I.4. Periodic faculty performance evaluation on teaching and in other functions is done by at least three of the following:

I.4.1. the Dean/Academic Head/Department Chair;

I.4. Periodic faculty performance evaluation on teaching and in other functions is done by at least three of the following:

I.4.2. students;

I.4. Periodic faculty performance evaluation on teaching and in other functions is done by at least three of the following:

I.4.3. the faculty member himself/herself;

I.4. Periodic faculty performance evaluation on teaching and in other functions is done by at least three of the following:

I.4.4. peers; and

1.5. The results of the performance evaluation are used to improve the performance of the faculty.

I.6. Students are given recognition for exemplary academic and nonacademic performances.

I.7. Outstanding achievement of students is recognized and encouraged through the following:

I.7.1. inclusion in the honor roll, Dean's list, etc.;

I.7. Outstanding achievement of students is recognized and encouraged through the following:

I.7.2. grant of tuition scholarships;

Scholarships are offered internally and externally funded as shown in the student manual page 64-68.

I.7. Outstanding achievement of students is recognized and encouraged through the following:

I.7.3. award of honor medals and merit certificates;

I.7. Outstanding achievement of students is recognized and encouraged through the following:

I.7.4. membership in honor societies/honor class/sections, etc;

I.7. Outstanding achievement of students is recognized and encouraged through the following:

I.7.5. grant of special privileges such as opportunities in leadership and others (excluding exemption from major exams on all professional subjects); and

I.7. Outstanding achievement of students is recognized and encouraged through the following:

I.7.6. grant of awards and recognition for their outstanding academic accomplishments e.g., Best Thesis, Student Researcher of the Year, etc.

I.8. Indicators on performance of graduates are studied such as:

I.8.1. analysis of performance of graduates in the National Certification if required;

I.8. Indicators on performance of graduates are studied such as:

I.8.1. analysis of performance of graduates in the National Certification if required;

I.8.2. employability of graduates; and

I.8.3. feedback from employees regarding performance of graduates.

The Department of Tourism Management is currently conducting a graduate tracer study having produce graduates since 2015.

OUTCOMES

0.1. The faculty and students have commendable performance as a result of administrative support.

OUTCOMES

0.1. The faculty and students have commendable performance as a result of administrative support.

0.2. The graduates of the program are employable.