Added August 5, 2021
The Man Who Filmed The Tic Tac UFO, Extraordinary Beliefs, Jeremy Corbell, July 28, 2021
"For the first time on camera Commander Chad Underwood clarifies and informs what happened when he encountered and recorded what is now the most famous modern UFO footage of all-time. Cmdr. Underwood is Navy Weapon Systems Officer from VFA-41 (the legendary Black Aces). He was flying in an F/A-18 Super Hornet - and was responsible for fighting the aircraft. Underwood’s testimony represents the first time in history a military “whizzo” recorded a UFO during operations - and the encounter footage has been confirmed directly by the United States Government as being actual footage of an Advanced Aerospace Vehicle of unknown origin a real UFO.
"Cmdr. Underwood’s account and footage also represents independent corroborating evidence to accompany the experience of Cmdr. David Fravor."
"The advanced and unidentified craft they observed and engaged that day - was able to outpace & outmaneuver our nation's most advanced war planes. It did in-fact “zoom off” to the left of Underwood’s wing - and it broke the lock on his ATFLIR targeting pod. It had no typical aeronautics or aerospace propulsion signatures - no tail, no wings, no exhaust plumes - and it also was able to offensively jam our fighter plane's radar & weapons systems. This is not an isolated event quite the opposite."
My Comments
Commander Underwood gives a very serious interview. His report corroborates Commander Fravor and US Navy Chief Master-at Arms, Sean Cahill.
Added July 13, 2021
Retired Navy chief who witnessed a UFO shares his story, Glenn Beck, June 30, 2021
"Retired US Navy Chief Master-at Arms, Sean Cahill, is an eyewitness to the Nimitz Tic Tac UAP (otherwise known as a UFO). He explains to Glenn exactly what he and others witnessed while on board the nuclear aircraft. Then, he explains to Glenn why the 9-page report on UFOs recently released by Congress isn’t as discouraging (or lacking of information) that some may think."
My Comments
Glenn Beck interviewed Chief-Master-at Arms, Sean Cahill a Nimitz Tic Tac eye witness.
"Glenn Beck is a well known conservative political commentator. He is the CEO, founder, and owner of Mercury Radio Arts, the parent company of his television and radio network TheBlaze. He hosts the Glenn Beck Radio Program, a popular talk-radio show nationally syndicated on Premiere Radio Networks. Beck also hosts the Glenn Beck television program."
Added June 11, 2021
Are Tic Tac UAPs Performing Military Surveillance for a Terrestrial Foreign State? by the SETI Nuggets Editor, June 11, 2021
In my opinion, the Tic Tac UAPs clearly evidence ET advanced aeronautical knowledge. My speculation is the Tic Tac UAPs also may have advanced knowledge in an array of sciences such as physics, chemistry, and biology. I do not look at the UAPs only according to the inquiry scope defined by the US Senate Intelligence Committee.
Recently in the news a US Senator opined the Tic Tac UAPs are performing surveillance for a foreign state. The US Senator seemed quite sure about this and only viewed the Tic Tacs from a military perspective.
A state that organically developed Tic Tac technology could find other paths to commercialize the Tic Tac technology. For example, they could apply the Tic Tac technology to commercial airlines and space ships.
I don't think using an interstellar aircraft to conduct surveillance for a terrestrial power is a logical application of the ET technology. A state that acquired Tic Tac technology would probably integrate it with their overall military capabilities, airforce and ships, etc. The ETs that manufactured the Tic Tacs might conquer the Earth and/or terraform it. In my opinion, the Senator's bicoastal surveillance theory seems to evidence a weak understanding of the Tic Tacs capabilities.
It is more likely the Tic Tacs are performing surveillance for ETs than for China or Russia. I don't believe China or Russia has the Tic Tac technology.
Added June 10, 2021
Estimating Flight Characteristics of Anomalous Unidentified Aerial Vehicles, September 25, 2019
'These unidentified craft typically exhibit anomalous flight characteristics, such as traveling at extremely high speeds, changing direction or accelerating at extremely high rates, and hovering motionless for long periods of time. Furthermore, these craft appear to violate the laws of physics in that they do not have flight or control surfaces, any visible means of propulsion apparently violating Newton’s Third Law, and can operate in multiple media, such as space (low Earth orbit), air, and water without apparent hindrance, sonic booms, or heat dumps.'
Given the above information, is it logical many news outlets say there is no evidence of ETs?
China, Russia, US skunk works all refuted, so what UAP sources remain?
The likely answer is the UAPs were manufactured by ETs.
What other explanations are better?
Given the aeronautical capabilities of the Tic Tac UAPs what is the SETI scientists' explanation that is better than UAPs were manufactured by ETs? Will it be this: We will find a non-ET cause for the UAPs sometime in the future?
When logical people read the DoD conclusion "there's no evidence of ETs" they will learn the difference between malarkey propaganda and truth. The SETI scientists have backed the wrong paradigm looking mainly at the skies instead of at the Tic Tacs buzzing military installations.
NASA recently picked a new administrator but unfortunately he is surrounded by scientists who prefer looking at the stars for intelligent life instead of the local UAPs buzzing installations on Earth.
If NASA exobiologists found methane on an exoplanet they would dance around and hypothesize there could be farm animals on that planet. Of course they would also examine possible alternate hypotheses for the methane. But animals would be high on their leaderboard of hypotheses as the source of the methane.
Added June 10, 2021
UAP Physics, Muons, and Occam's Razor, by the SETI Nuggets Editor, June 10, 2021
Parsimony or Occam's razor is a principle that says an explanation that is simpler and uses fewer assumptions is preferable to a more complex explanation.
Applying that rule, phenomena that posit ETs or violations in the laws of physics should probably be considered ipse dixit wrong.
UAPs and physics
Estimating Flight Characteristics of Anomalous Unidentified Aerial Vehicles, September 25, 2019
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7514271/
'These unidentified craft typically exhibit anomalous flight characteristics, such as traveling at extremely high speeds, changing direction or accelerating at extremely high rates, and hovering motionless for long periods of time. Furthermore, these craft appear to violate the laws of physics in that they do not have flight or control surfaces, any visible means of propulsion apparently violating Newton’s Third Law, and can operate in multiple media, such as space (low Earth orbit), air, and water without apparent hindrance, sonic booms, or heat dumps.'
My Comments
Using the principle of parsimony the UAP behavior should be explainable by a mundane solution that does not need violations in the laws of physics.
The same astrophysicists have no problem getting excited about gray matter that fills most of the universe or the conjectured string theories.
Muons are subatomic particles that may require a modification of standard physics:
Long-Awaited Muon Measurement Boosts Evidence for New Physics, Scientific American, April 7, 2021
"Muon g-2 is an experiment at Fermi National Laboratory in Batavia, Ill, that aims to precisely measure how magnetic muons are by watching them wobble in a magnetic field. If the experimental value of these particles’ magnetic moment differs from the theoretical prediction-an anomaly-that deviation could be a sign of new physics, such as some subtle and unknown muon-influencing particle or force."
Why are physicists eager to change the standard model of particle physics. Instead they should say the principle of parsimony rules out any change in the laws of physics.
Perhaps, there's a glitch in the equipment or the anomalous Muon data may be caused by weather conditions or by orbiting satellites or by swamp gas or optical illusions.
Physicists undoubtedly would say: We take utmost precautions to eliminate all sources of error. Maybe they are missing a few sources of errors.
Hopefully, the upcoming US Senate UAP report, probably submitted to the Senate June 25, 2021, will demonstrate the UAPs are real, and they aren't caused by errors in all of the military's radars, infrared, and other types of cameras and sensors.
Conclusion
Physics is rife with conjectures such as gray matter and string theories, and has no problem accepting Muons which do not fit the standard model of particle physics. When it comes to UAPs the same physicists are quick to conclude the evidence for UAPs is caused by one or multiple spurious human or technological errors.
A reason I believe the military sensor data is more significant than, say, SETI data is getting the military data correct can be a matter of life or death for a fighter pilot. With SETI the same stakes do not exist. If SETI scientists miss a signal from an ET civilization a few tens of light years away it is no big deal.
Finally, I consider it laughable the Senate UAP report may describe the aerodynamic capabilities of UAPs and conclude those don't evidence ETs. We know the UAPs are not from skunk works, China, or Russia.
Bring out Dawkins, maybe he would suggest the UAPs evolved according to Darwin's theories and laws of natural selection - that's what he says about watches, computers, and airplanes. Probably he would suggest UAPs evolved under the oceans or in volcanos, out of sight for thousands of years,
Updated May 25, 2021
Jimmy Carter UFO incident: Former US President Jimmy Carter filed a UFO report alleging he saw a UFO.
Wikipedia: Jimmy Carter UFO incident
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Carter_UFO_incident
Paul Hellyer interview on Disclosure, August 15, 2017
Paul Hellyer is a former Canadian Minister of National Defense.
Excerpt from his interview about NASA:
"Paul Hellyer: "NASA will be putting out story after story saying they just discovered a planet which might have sentient life on it and if it had life could be found in ten years this is deliberate disinformation because NASA knows darn well that these things are real and that they've seen them and recorded them."
Added May 2, 2021
Pentagon UFO report: They ‘acknowledged the reality,’ whistleblower says, NY Post, April 24, 2021
https://nypost.com/2021/04/24/pentagon-ufo-report-its-a-reality-whistleblower-says/
"During a press conference this week, Elizondo made clear that UFOs have been observed to have qualities that are nothing less than otherworldly. He described vessels flying at 11,000 miles-per-hour and being able to turn “instantly.” Providing a comparison, he explained, for our most advanced jets going at the same speed, “if you wanted to make a right-hand turn, it would take you about half the state of Ohio to do it.”
"He also detailed Spielberg-worthy operational capabilities that fall into the realm of “transmedium travel.” Elizondo explained that the eye-popping vessels can fly 50-feet above the Earth’s surface or 80,000 feet in the sky and even submerge underwater without a compromise in performance: “When you see that, you recognize you are dealing with a technology more advanced than ours.”
My Comments
I have nothing to do with politics and don't like the unproductive red and blue kerfuffle. That said, in my opinion if Trump declassified the UFO files before he left office I think he would have easily won re-election.
Trump was a master of the photo opportunity. Consider the picture of Trump in a US government storehouse stroking and examining a shiny, metallic UFO like a mechanic on the show Counting Cars licking his chops over their garage's latest find.
Trump had an easily winning hand and blew it. Perhaps he did not get requisite permissions for a UFO reveal by the ranking ET members of the Galactic Federation.
April 3, 2021
Naval History and Heritage Command website
Unidentified Flying Objects Research Guide
https://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/research-guides/ufo-research-guide.html
My Comments
The US Navy's Unidentified Flying Objects Research Guide provides a comprehensive starting point for UAP research. I think this information is tacit acceptance by the Navy that UAPs exist.
Harry Reid | Full Q&A | Oxford Union Web Series, Jan 28, 2021
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSiFA090Jqk&ab_channel=OxfordUnion
Question to former US Senator Harry Reid on UFOs [YouTube 49:21]
Senator Harry Reid, YouTube 53:57
"find out the main thing we found out is that there were lots and lots of these occurrences and that was the most important thing it wasn't uh some weird uh people living in the some slum or some ivory tower they were people who just saw these things and wanted to report them and we we've made progress the military people were afraid to report them because it would hurt their uh advancement as officers but now they the military has done the right thing that pentagon has said if pilots see these occurrences they need to report them"
Senator Marco Rubio Says We Need To ID UFOs Flying Over Military Bases, TMZ Magazine, March 23, 2021
https://www.tmz.com/2021/03/23/senator-marco-rubio-ufos-military-installations-aliens/
“Marco Rubio is worried as hell about unidentified flying objects buzzing over military bases and he's on board with the government getting to the bottom of it.”
"We got the U.S. Senator from Florida out Monday at Reagan National Airport and asked him about UFOs and aliens. Our intent was a lighthearted convo, but Rubio got dead-ass serious about the potential danger the U.S. faces from unidentified aircraft flying over our military installations."
"His argument's simple ... we don't know what's flying above our military bases -- or our not-so-friendly skies, for that matter -- and his colleagues on the Senate Committee on Intelligence need to figure it out because "maybe it's another country, and that would be bad news too."
My Comments
This is an extraordinary interview on UFOs by Marco Rubio who is a US Senator from Florida and member of the US Senate Intelligence committee.
US Senator Rubio knows, apparently with certainty, that UAPs are “buzzing” US military bases. The Senator does not know who built them. It seems to me the choices are: Russia, China, or ETs.
If US Intel similarly show UAPs are “buzzing” Russia and China military installations, we can rule out Russia and China leaving ETs as the likely owners of the UAPs.
False flag ops by US, Russia, or China hoaxing to be wild and crazy ETs is a possibility but we rule out those improbable scenarios.
I have opined in the past there is no reason to assume UFOs abide by the Star Trek Prime Directive. Did Commanders Kirk or Picard “buzz” any civilization using the Starship USS Enterprise?
Upcoming Pentagon report will detail ‘difficult to explain’ UFO sightings, NY Post, March 21, 2021
https://nypost.com/2021/03/21/pentagon-report-will-detail-difficult-to-explain-ufo-sightings/
"A forthcoming government report will detail a number of “difficult to explain” UFO sightings, former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe said in a recent interview."
My Comments
Here are some questions I hope the upcoming Pentagon UFO reveal will answer:
Are the UFOs from the same interstellar origin?
Are there varieties of UFOs?
Do the UFOs all have the same capabilities?
Who or what is piloting the UFOs?
Are there crashed UFOs?
Will the report say there are ETs?
Are there live interactions between humans and UFOs?
Are there live interactions between humans and ETs?
What do ETs think about humans?
Are UFOs a threat to the US or any other country?
Has the US replicated any advanced UFO technology?
Assuming UFOs have advanced aeronautical skills can we assume they are advanced in other fields of science? Have ETs demonstrated this?
Have other countries replicated any advanced UFO technology?
Are ETs living now on Earth?
Why have many countries censored news on UFOs?
Has the 'Are we alone in the universe?' question been definitively answered by the Pentagon decades ago?
Has the US gained knowledge from UFOs?
Has the Pentagon inferred from UFOs their origin is interstellar? Or the UAPs have unknown origin but perhaps not interstellar. For example, the UFOs are built by Russia or China?
According to former Director of DNI John Ratcliffe, UFO sightings are global. Is there a density map showing where verified UFOs have been found? Are ETs more interested in some countries?
Why don't UFOs land on the front lawn of the White House?
Why do UFOs visit the Earth? Can't they obtain knowledge about Earth remotely?
Are the ETs piloting UFOs shy or are they playing around by creating UFO sightings in some orchestrated manner?
The Sun, Feb 13, 2021
"Pentagon admits it has been testing wreckage from UFO crashes & findings may ‘change our lives forever,’ expert says"
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/14038945/pentagon-admits-testing-wreckage-ufo-crashes/
"The Pentagon has admitted to holding and testing wreckage from UFO crashes in a bombshell Freedom of Information letter, shared with The Sun."
"Researcher Anthony Bragalia wrote to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) requesting details of all UFO material, which they hold and results of any tests they had been carrying out on it."
"In the response, shared with The Sun, the DIA released 154 pages of test results that includes reports on a mysterious "memory" metal called Nitinol, which remembers its original shape when folded."
"Bragalia said it was a "stunning admission" from the US government and the documents reveal that some of the retrieved debris possesses "extraordinary capabilities" including the potential to make things invisible or even slow down the speed of light."
"He told The Sun: "The Pentagon has admitted to holding and testing anomalous debris from UFOs."
My Comments
If the metallic substance held by the Pentagon is tested and determined to be a metal alloy not found on Earth that would be an enormous revelation. The samples appear to have been acquired decades ago by the Pentagon so it is equally amazing they hid the evidence for so long, a discovery fundamental to physics, astronomy, biology, and cosmology.
In addition to the extraterrestrial evidence and cover up there's also the clobbering of SETI scientists' now shattered wishes they will somehow discover ETs and claim to be the first to answer the big question: Are humans alone in the universe? It appears the Pentagon had the answer to the question.
It is important that independent and unbiased scientists verify or refute the Pentagon's UFO metal claim.
Purported ET Activities on Earth, added Feb 14, 2021
It's likely an ET visiting Earth is technologically advanced far beyond the threshold of an IT computing singularity. Humans might achieve a computation singularity this century. ETs may be millions of years past the advent of an exponential intelligence explosion.
Purported ET artifacts such as UFO crashes, meetings of the Galactic Federation, crop circles burned into meadows, and surgery performed on farm-yard cattle are not likely caused by ETs.
If ETs want to research humans and intermingle alien and human DNA they can do that in a lab petri dish without the need to abduct victims. ETs could use long range sensors to build their own copy of human DNA.
If ETs are carrying out some of the above activities, and I doubt it, those actions are performed for non-literal reasons such as terraforming the Earth.
In my opinion, there's an uneasy clash of a probable high-level of ET intelligence and aeronautical technologies, countered by a purported array of foolish UFO activities such as interacting with aircraft. Surely a UFO that has traversed the galaxy does not have a sound reason to jink it up with ordinary or even military aircraft.
Why don't ETs provide humans with encyclopedias from the future? Why don't ETs land in the Washington DC mall? Why don't various governments show the bodies of crashed ETs? Gray small folks with bulging eyes? Are ETs from different worlds acting on Earth alone or in concert?
In my opinion, ET facts should be public. We won't care if an ET has a bad hair day, or has B.O. The governments should open their warehouses and reveal their LGMs.
Conclusion
In my opinion, purported actions by ETs, aliens, and UFOs on Earth are, if real, performed for non-literal reasons such as terraforming the Earth. (I won't at this juncture opine if the terraforming is for the ETs, humans, both, or neither.)
The array of UFO activities ranging from producing crop circles to interacting with aircraft, and meetings of Dr. Eshed's galactic federation are so obviously ridiculous they should, in my opinion, be interpreted at a different level of abstraction that is not literal.
Added March 29, 2021
Comments on Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) | Mehdi Hasan Show, October 30, 2020
US Senator Harry Reid refers to the Tic Tacs and says:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6PM1UALbvc&ab_channel=TheChoice
[YouTube: 15:20]
"We haven't had a dozen of these undefined flying objects we haven't had 100 but thousands of them and that's all been identified I don't know what they are.
My Comments
Perusing some open-source descriptions of the wide array of Signals and MASINT resources available to the various branches of the military it is understandable the former US Senator is concerned.
Senator Harry Reid and others in government are ready to confirm the existence of UAPs but not LGMs. Senator Marco Rubio said in a recent TMZ interview the UAPs are not manufactured by the US. If the UAPs are technologically beyond the capabilities of our adversaries what remains as the source are ETs.