Project 3
Project 3
LDT630
LDT630
Embedded Files
Project 3 Case Study
Project 3 Case Study
The course design doesn't end at the implementation. The results and feedback are taken into the course evaluation that feeds into the revision of design and development, and the iterative cycle continues. In Project 3, we evaluated a sample course with OLC Quality Course Teaching & Instructional Practice (QCTIP), wrote a short case study analysis, and visualized the findings in an executive presentation.
1. Evaluation with QCTIP
1. Evaluation with QCTIP
I evaluated Instructional Design and Technology: Learning Theories USMx LDT100x from the course options ending on January 8, 2020.
In discussion with the instructor and peers, I submitted my findings about the course environment and evaluation approach through quantitative data from QCTIP.
yamamotor-QCTIP LDT100x.pdf 2. Case study analysis
2. Case study analysis
I wrote a case study analysis to gauge the effectiveness of the course through qualitative data analysis from QCTIP, highlighting three areas of accomplishments and issues from the Massive Online Open Course (MOOC).
yamamotor-case study analysis.pdf 3. Executive Presentation Video
3. Executive Presentation Video
I turned the analysis into a visual form. The audience is the Chair of the Department of Education, in charge of quality assurance of the MOOC.
Accessibility: WCAG A - Closed caption and basic transcript
Tools: PowerPoint, Camtasia, Audacity, YouTube
Shaping the Concept into Visuals
Shaping the Concept into Visuals
Process
Process
Review the requirements of the step 3 deliverables and keep them in mind.
Using paper and pen, note while working on steps 1 and 2.
Brainstorm the topics that present and translate well into visuals.
Aim to simplify and be concise in the presentation.
Find an appropriate PowerPoint template.
Lay out the template with the flow of the narrative.
Develop the outline into slides.
Fill in details and charts from steps 1 and 2.
Ensure adding credits and appropriate Creative Commons license.
Follow the making of the video process to complete the presentation.
In the end
Giving a shape for vague concepts in our minds is one of the effective ways to organize information. The challenge of translating information into a presentation for others is how to curb the sub-level information while maintaining the essential information in an easy way to follow with eyes and ears. I utilized clipart and graphs to show collected data. Overall, I enjoyed crafting narratives and data visualization in a tangible form!
References
Aydin, I. E. (2021). MOOC Participants’ Experiences and Recommendations for Improvement. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 22(3), 11–22.
CAST. (n.d.). UDL: The UDL Guidelines. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/
Cirulli, F., Elia, G., & Solazzo, G. (2017). A double-loop evaluation process for MOOC design and its pilot application in the university domain. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 433–448. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2017.09.027
Cisse, S. (2020, May 20). Library Guides: Massive Online Open Courses (MOOC): History of MOOC. https://nsufl.libguides.com/c.php?g=112312&p=725994
Eglseer, D. (2023). Development and evaluation of a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) for healthcare professionals on malnutrition in older adults. Nurse Education Today, 123, 105741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105741
Goel, Y., & Goyal, R. (2020). On the Effectiveness of Self-Training in MOOC Dropout Prediction. Open Computer Science, 10(1), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1515/comp-2020-0153
Groce, N. E. (2018). Global Disability: An emerging issue. The Lancet Global Health, 6(7), e724–e725. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30265-1
Rosser-Majors, M. L., Rebeor, S., McMahon, C., Wilson, A., Stubbs, S. L., Harper, Y., & Sliwinski, L. (2022). Improving Retention Factors and Student Success Online Utilizing the Community of Inquiry Framework’s Instructor Presence Model. Online Learning, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i2.2731
Sanz-Martínez, L., Er, E., Martínez-Monés, A., Dimitriadis, Y., & Bote-Lorenzo, M. L. (2019). Creating collaborative groups in a MOOC: A homogeneous engagement grouping approach. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(11), 1107–1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1571109
Shah, D., Pickard, L., & Ma, R. (2022, January 11). Massive List of MOOC Platforms Around the World in 2023. Class Central. https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-platforms/
Smyrnova-Trybulska, E., Sekret, I., Morze, N., & McKay, E. (2022). Evaluation of the MOOCs Quality and Its Effectiveness for Teachers’ Training in the Field of Digital Competences and Their Use in Education: A Case Study. International Journal of Research in E-Learning, 8(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2022.8.1.03
WebAIM. (n.d.). WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools. https://wave.webaim.org/
Zhu, M., Bonk, C. J., & Sari, A. R. (2018). Instructors’ Experience of Designing MOOCs in Higher Education: Considerations and Challenges. Online Learning, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1495
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse