In the late 1950s, learning theory shifted away from the use of behavioral models to an approach derived from the cognitive sciences. Psychologists and educators began to investigate complex cognitive processes such as problem-solving, concept formation, and information processing that could not be evaluated with overt, observable "output" behavior. They believed that internal mental learning processes can indeed be understood scientifically.
Cognitivism emphasizes the learner's thought process of acquiring new knowledge and produces original thought not directly connected to any "inputs." Curious? Let's dive into what's happening in our learning brain.
The real focus is on changing the learner by encouraging him/her to use appropriate learning strategies (Ertmer and Newby, 2013).
To know what strategy works well itself is valuable.
Promotes long-term learning through efficient retention of knowledge and skills.
Applicable for both lower- and higher-level thinking skills.
Adaptable to individual and social situations.
Cognitive processes are not observable and thus hard to assess and measure.
Learners may have varied schemata.
Neurodiversity--neurocognitive functioning in human brains has variations.
One structured lesson plan can't accommodate the needs of all since each learner processes information differently.
Excludes biological, gene, and chemical imbalance factors which could affect learners' mental capacity.
Motivations
Learners' motivation is intrinsic, and they are intellectually curious. They set their own goals and seek what makes them tick. They surround themselves with like-minded learners and equip themselves with self-regulation and locus of control. Bandura described intrinsic reinforcement as a form of internal reward, such as pride, satisfaction, and a sense of accomplishment (Cherry, 2021).
Possible applications and strategies
Classrooms / Workplace / Professional development / Internship / Apprenticeship / Reasoning / Intuitive and analytical problem-solving / Retrieving information to apply for the new situation / Analyzing / Annotating / Classifying / Summarizing / Paraphrasing / Evaluating
♦ Information processor.
♦ Active agent, a 'DO-er.'
♦ Monitor and adjust behavior (USMx LTD100x).
♦ Attend to, code, transform, rehearse, store, and retrieve information (Ertmer & Newby, 2013).
♦ Locus of control: having a sense of ownership over what you do and what the results are.
♦ Increase self-efficacy by mastering what you believe you are capable of, usually with support from others.
♦ Role model. Be aware that social cognitive learning is happening.
♦ Provide sequences that allow learners to use the most effective strategies to encode information.
♦ Present new information with an appropriate level of cognitive load.
♦ Encourage learners to set goals, plan, and self-monitor (Michera, 2020).
♦ Assist learners in organizing information in optimal ways (Ertmer & Newby, 2013).
♦ Assess learners' memory retention and adapt instruction accordingly to maximize encoding and retrieval.
Cognitive overload stems from the Cognitive Load Theory attributed to John Sweller. The human mind can only absorb a limited amount of information in working memory. According to 7 plus or minus 2 rule in Miller's 1956 article, we can only process 5 to 9 pieces of information at a time. If this limit is exceeded or not given enough time to process information, you run the risk of overloading the learner's mental pathways. The information simply overflows and never be encoded into the long-term memory (Pappas, 2016).
Then, how to prevent cognitive overload?
Use assessments to determine preexisting knowledge.
Focused lessons, short and sweet.
Chunking: Break complex problems into smaller, bite-sized steps. Allow learners to control the speed of learning.
Clean, clutter-free layout. Include white space, creating a sense of harmony.
Spread the load between verbal and visual channels.
A Proper balance of text, audio, and visuals. Place the text close to the corresponding visuals.
Don't narrate on-screen text word-for-word. Make the on-screen text a summary.
Include the necessary resources in the course.
Make space to reflect and assimilate. For example, an image or presentation that sums up the subject matter can take the place of a paragraph.
✔️Understand that individuals bring various learning experiences to the learning situation which can impact learning outcomes.
✔️ Determine the most effective manner in which to organize and structure new information to tap the learners’ previously acquired knowledge, abilities, and experiences.
✔️ Arrange practice with feedback so that the new information is effectively and efficiently assimilated and/or accommodated within the learners’ cognitive structure.
✔️ Use techniques such as advance organizers, analogies, metaphors, hierarchical relationships, and matrices to help learners relate new information to prior knowledge.
✔️ Present the information that is “sized” and “chunked” in such a way that they can assimilate and/or accommodate the new information as quickly and as easily as possible.
✔️ Emphasize the active involvement of the learner in the learning process. [learner control, metacognitive training (e.g., self-planning, monitoring, and revising techniques)]
✔️ Use of hierarchical analyses to identify and illustrate prerequisite relationships. [cognitive task analysis procedures]
✔️ Emphasize structuring, organizing, and sequencing information to facilitate optimal processing. [use of cognitive strategies such as outlining, summaries, synthesizers, advance organizers, etc.]
✔️ Create learning environments that allow and encourage students to make connections with previously learned material. [recall of prerequisite skills; use of relevant examples, analogies]
In this learning scenario, I located one instructional material on the internet and analyzed how the material addresses cognitive load needs.
Material: Explore the CQ Capabilities from the Cultural Intelligence Center [video]. YouTube.
Overview: The video provides a quick overview of Cultural Intelligence (CQ) that supplies an article about creating culturally intelligent virtual learning (Upton, 2020). In continuation of the two previous learning scenarios, this video is one of the scaffolding materials that the new program manager, Kelly’s mentor, recommended to her. Because the knowledge of CQ is an eminent component of her being able to communicate effectively with her international and remote team, she is eager to absorb and organize the incoming information and integrate it through active processing (Academic Outreach, n.d.).
Cognitive load principles:
While the video encompasses many of Mayer’s Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (Sorden, 2005), the principles that stand out are modality and segmenting principles.
For the modality principle, the visuospatial sketch pad and the phonological loop (Sorden, 2005) are working well here. It introduces the overview by drawing with a black ink pen on a whiteboard. This style offers viewers a clean, clutter-free visual that focuses on one sequenced idea at a time (Pappas, 2006). As the pen draws pictures, a human voice follows the explanation simultaneously.
Another one is the segmenting principle -- the content, the wheel of CQ, is broken down into 4 pies, and each pie is zoomed in while explained with concept and example pictures. After pie explanations are completed, the view zooms out to see what has been covered in the whole picture. This causes a pause, as mentioned as self-explaining, which is simply understanding or making sense of something (Sorden, 2005).
Suggested improvement:
One improvement in the video is the signaling principle. Since the style uses only a black pen on a white background, it’s monochromatic. To emphasize the main points, some colors could be used partially to have a stand-out effect when essential cues are added (Academic Outreach, n.d.).
Cognitivism has a wide range of uses in many settings, reaching a large number of learners. Because of that, when we design instructions, we want to be mindful of the accessibility and neurodiversity of learners. A structured curriculum and assessment may not capture all learnings or non-learnings in measurable ways.
References
Cognitivism
Bruner, J.S., Postman, L., (1949). On the perception of incongruity: a paradigm. Journal of Personality. 18(2), pp. 206-223 https://doi-org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.tb01241.x
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features From an Instructional Design Perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143
Michela, E. (2018). The Students’ Guide to Learning Design and Research. In The Students’ Guide to Learning Design and Research. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/studentguide/cognitivism
Smith, M. K. (n.d.). Jerome S. Bruner and the process of education. In The encyclopedia of pedagogy and informal education. https://infed.org/mobi/jerome-bruner-and-the-process-of-education/
Social Cognitive Learning Theory
Bandura, A. (2005). The evolution of social cognitive theory. Great Mind in Management. https://d37djvu3ytnwxt.cloudfront.net/assets/courseware/v1/e57a5dfc0367fe26ee4ff80c9433e74e/asset-v1:USMx+LDT100x+2T2017_2+type@asset+block/Bandura2005.pdf
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), pp. 191-215 https://doi-org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Cherry, K. (2021, July 28). Social Learning Theory. https://www.verywellmind.com/social-learning-theory-2795074
Course Hero. (n.d.). Social cognitive learning theory. Educational Psychology. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/edpsy/chapter/social-cognitive-learning-theory/
Cognitive Load
Academic Outreach. (n.d.). 12 principles of multimedia learning. The University of Mississippi. https://elearning.olemiss.edu/12-principles-of-multimedia-learning/
Emory, B. (2019). Cognitive load theory and instructional message design. In M. Ramlatchan (Ed.), Instructional Message Design: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1. Norfolk, VA: Kindle Direct Publishing.
Sorden, S. (2005). A Cognitive Approach to Instructional Design for Multimedia Learning, Informing Science Journal, 8.
Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning
Guyan, M. (2013, November 1). 5 ways to reduce cognitive load in eLearning. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/5-ways-to-reduce-cognitive-load-in-elearning
Mayer, R. (2009). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pappas, C. (2016, April 17). 7 tips to reduce cognitive overload in eLearning. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/7-tips-reduce-cognitive-overload-elearning
Learning Scenario
Upton, S. (2020, September 25). Creating culturally intelligent virtual learning. Cultural Intelligence Center. https://culturalq.com/blog/four-tips-for-creating-a-culturally-intelligent-virtual-learning-experience/
Rencher, S. (2020, January 20). Explore the CQ Capabilities from the Cultural Intelligence Center [video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMUk4ScTKns&t=190s
Photo credits
All images and design elements are sourced from Canva Library.