Designing and developing meaningful learning experiences for adult learners requires a solid understanding of how adults learn differently from younger learners (Cochran & Brown, n.d.).
Adults have accumulated knowledge, rich experience, and fixed ideas about what they believe works for them. They are preoccupied with life in general and dislike wasting time. They want effective learning experiences that help them meet their needs and achieve their goals (Gutierrez, n.d.).
We will look into adult learning theories, andragogy's key aspects, and instructional design implications.
While both could be planned and organized in classroom-based lectures or structured e-learning courses, the factor is who is controlling the learning objectives and goals for the learning experience. When the learner is motivated internally and self-setting the goals, intake of new information is more likely to have an impact. In fact, data suggests people learn roughly 70 percent from informal experience or practice; 20 percent from peer learning; and 10 percent from formal content (Pierce, 2014).
Learner-centered (Cochran & Brown).
Learners have more flexibility and choices.
Allow learners to develop content in accordance with their specific needs (Blondy, 2007).
Promote life-long learning.
Designed to accept viewpoints from people at different life stages and value sets (Zimke, 2007).
Combine a variety of instructional design theories and models.
Adapt to digital-age and on-the-go learners (Gutierrez, n.d.).
A transformative learning experience will deeply impact learners, trigger radical changes, and leave lasting impressions (Gutierrez, n.d.).
Information that conflicts sharply with what is already held to be true forces a reevaluation of the old material. This slows down integration (Zimke, 2007).
Information that has little overwrap with what is already known is acquired slowly (Zimke, 2007).
Fast-paced, complex, or unusual learning tasks interfere with the learning of the concepts or data (Zimke, 2007).
Adults tend to compensate for being slower by being more accurate and making fewer trial-and-error ventures (Zimke, 2007).
Potential redundancy and inconsistency in knowledge, and lack of accuracy and relevance of the information with informal learning (Pierces, 2014).
The National Institute for Staff and Organizational Development lists a reliable analysis of andragogy, categorized in 1) motivation to learn; 2) curriculum design; and 3) the classroom setting (Zimke, 2007). Characters of adult learners and teachers below are taken from the source.
♦ Seek out learning experiences to cope with specific life-changing events.
♦ Motivated to engage in learning to help them cope with the transition.
♦ Willing to engage in, before, after, or even during the actual life-changing event.
♦ Know that there is a use of the knowledge or skill in demand.
♦ Secondary motivation is to increase self-esteem and the pleasure of integrating new ideas into the existing base.
♦ Prefer single-concept courses focusing on the application of a relevant problem.
♦ Prefer self-directed and self-designed projects.
♦ Select more than one medium of learning.
♦ Desire to control the pace and start/stop time.
♦ Prefer how-to information and immediate application.
♦ Learn well from dialogue with respected peers.
♦ Know the concepts will be in concert or in conflict with the learner. Some instruction must be designed to effect a change in belief and value systems.
♦ Ensure the learning is problem-oriented, personalized, and accepts learners' need for self-direction and personal responsibility.
♦ Self-directed learning doesn't mean isolation. It indicates involving an average of ten other people as resources and the like-minded.
♦ Clarify and articulate all expectations before getting into the concept.
♦ Facilitate with open-ended questions.
♦ Control the balance between presentation, new material, debate, discussion, sharing relevant student experiences, and the clock.
♦ Keep reminding the group of the variety of potential solutions to the problem.
♦ Use an eclectic approach to develop strategies and procedures.
✔️ Does the learning experience create relevance by mapping courses with perceived learner needs?
✔️ Does it devise instructional strategies in alignment with real learning contexts?
✔️ Does it choose the technology that best supports the instructional strategy?
✔️ Are instructional strategies relevant for digital-age and on-the-go learners?
Informal Learning with LinkedIn Learning
Prior to taking this course, I wanted to gain an overview of the field of instructional design [readiness] and watched a learning path series at LinkedIn Learning that consisted of 8 courses [motivation]. The course topics covered the basic introductory range of models, analysis, storyboarding, adult learners, creating videos, SMEs, agile, and evaluation within 8 hours of content. The self-paced course was divided into sections and chunks to let learners follow along with ease. There were optional downloadable PDF files to fill in, but no follow-up or structure to discuss diverse ideas with peers. Reflecting and bouncing it with peer reviewers were missing [missing social context]. I thought this was such a nature of the video-focused course in which the application of knowledge was 100% depending on how you take it from there [self-direction]. A few months later, my memory of the contents has gone blurry.
This example shows that Knowles’ 4 principles of andragogy are absent. Adult involvement completely relies on each individual, connecting to the adult’s experience, problem-solving, and immediate relevance (Pappas, 2017). The learning goal and target of the course are probably simply providing a glance into the field, not comprehension of the contents [Informal learning: the provider has control over the learning goal and target].
Principle: Learner’s Experience
While the contents of recorded video lectures are inflexible to intake learners’ experience, they can be distributed to a large number of people. This is a general assumption on MOOCs.
But Cochran and Brown (n.d.) discuss that course content should be flexible in that it can evolve rather than follow a specific script (Conrad & Donaldson, 2004). Accommodating a personalized approach on the online platform with limited resources is challenging. To reflect on and incorporate feedback, a lecturer/teacher must develop different skills and knowledge on facilitation and people management in the globally diverse learning environment.
References
Blondy, C. L. (2007). Evaluation and Application of Andragogical Assumptions to the Adult Online Learning Environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning. 6 (2). ISSN: 1541-4914.
Cochran, C., & Brown. S. (n.d.). Andragogy and the adult learner. City University of Seattle. https://repository.cityu.edu/bitstream/handle/20.500.11803/594/Chap7Supporting.pdf
Conrad, R., & Donaldson, J. A. (2004). Engaging the online learner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Finley, J. (2010, May 17). Andragogy (Adult Learning) [video] YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLoPiHUZbEw&t=47s
eLearning Infographics.com (2014, April 2). The adult learning theory – andragogy – infographic. https://elearninginfographics.com/adult-learning-theory-andragogy-infographic/
eLearning Infographics.com (2016, June 5). Formal learning vs. informal learning infographic. https://elearninginfographics.com/formal-learning-vs-informal-learning-infographic/
Gutierrez, K. (n.d.). Adult learning theories every instructional designer must know. SH!FT. https://www.shiftelearning.com/blog/adult-learning-theories-instructional-design
Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2005). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (6th ed.). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
LinkedIn Learning. (n.d.). Become an instructional designer [MOOC]. LinkedIn Corporation. https://www.linkedin.com/learning/paths/become-an-instructional-designer
Malamed, C. (n.d.). Transformative learning: another perspective on adult learning. The eLearning Coach. https://theelearningcoach.com/elearning_design/isd/tranformative-learning-another-perspective-on-adult-learning/
McLeod, S. A. (2017, October 24). Kolb - learning styles and experiential learning cycle. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html
Pappas, C. (2014, August 15). 9 tips to apply adult learning theory to eLearning. https://elearningindustry.com/9-tips-apply-adult-learning-theory-to-elearning
Pappas, C. (2017, July 20). The Adult Learning Theory - Andragogy - of Malcolm Knowles. https://elearningindustry.com/the-adult-learning-theory-andragogy-of-malcolm-knowles
Pierce, M. (2014, December 22). Training for the new year: formal vs. informal learning. Training. https://trainingmag.com/training-for-the-new-year-formal-vs-informal-learning/
Smith, M. K. (2002). ‘Malcolm Knowles, informal adult education, self-direction and andragogy’, The encyclopedia of pedagogy and informal education. [https://infed.org/mobi/malcolm-knowles-informal-adult-education-self-direction-and-andragogy/.
Steele, C. (2022, March 7). An essential guide to andragogy for learning businesses. Leading Learning. https://www.leadinglearning.com/guide-to-andragogy/
WGU. (2020, July 17). What is the transformative learning theory? https://www.wgu.edu/blog/what-transformative-learning-theory2007.html
Wikibooks. (n.d.). Learning theories/adult learning theories. https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Learning_Theories/Adult_Learning_Theories#Andragogy%20
Zemke, R., & Zemke. S., & Roueche S.D. (Eds.). (2007, February 9). 30 Things We Know for Sure About Adult Learners. 29(4). The National Institute for Staff and Organizational Development. http://www.muskegoncc.edu/Include/CTL%20DOCS/XXIX_No4.pdf
Photo credits
All images and design elements are sourced from Canva Library.