Trouble in Keynesian Paradigm

There were some people who were unhappy and these were the multinational, there were industrial complex and certainly the rich and wealthy who were just not happy with having an equal share with the rest. They wanted to have their maximum amongst power and this is what they used to that and in fact in this period they managed to achieve this in some countries like Chile in Latin America they managed to achieve very high profits. They became very interested in eager about achieving the same needs within England and Europe which they could if the regulations were not there. But unlike other countries they used dictatorships to achieve their goals, to force deregulation on economies because it could not be achieved democratically as it was not in the best interest of the people. In the USA, UK and Europe they could not achieve the same results by dictatorship so there were two elements that were necessary to create the Monetarists Revolution or counter-Revolution against Keynes. They were looking for a crisis as if there was a crisis, then people are in shock then people are confused in that time and if one is prepared and ready then he/she can successfully encounter existing theories. This is what Milton Friedman said that only a crisis produces change, when that crisis occurs the actions that are taken depend on the ideas that are lying around. So for about 25 years the Chicago school just prepared the idea and they knew that nobody will believe them so they were waiting for a crisis once the time has come then later then we will go in with full force and we will be able to do our business.