Good Guys Murder

Good Guys commit Murder. The Bad Guys get High.

"Murder is not the crime of criminals but that of law abiding citizens" Emmanuel Teney

Main difference between a Good Guy and a Bad Guy is the Good Guy gets

Immunity / Leniency for their actual crimes,

while the Bad Guy get Wrongfully Convicted for crimes he did not do.

USA = SLAVERY

UNITED SLAVES OF AMERICA TWO TIER LEGAL SYSTEM:

MASTAS=IMMUNITY

SLAVES=WRONGFUL CONVICTION

The Good Guys:

Law Enforcement Officers commit the most violent assault crimes, the most sexual assault crimes, the most fatal excessive force crimes, and police domestic violence is two to four times higher than the general population.

Law enforcement Killed at least: 1,112 in 2014 (min.). 1,213 in 2015 (min.). 1,156 in 2016 (min.).

1,188 in 2017 (min.). 4 year average (min.) = 1,167

Armed police commit more crimes than armed citizens:

“We find that civilian gun permit holders are convicted of misdemeanors and felonies at less than a sixth the rate for police officers,” the report says. “Among police, firearms violations occur at a rate of 16.5 per 100,000 officers. Among permit holders in Florida and Texas, the rate is only 2.4 per 100,000.

Law abiding citizens committed 86% of all Murders in 2011. Felons only committed 14% of all murders.

A "Normal" "Law-Abiding" person is 3 to 6 times more likely to commit Murder than a hardened criminal.

A "Normal" person is 10 times more likely to commit Murder than the mentally ill.

Calculate the cost of white collar crime at $486 billion and argue that white-collar crime 1.) is much more costly than street crimes 2.) is widespread 3.) white-collar criminals are seldom arrested and charged 4.) when they are prosecuted and convicted, sentences are light.

Myth: Poor people and minorities are committing the most crime.

Fact: The rich commit far more crime than the poor.

http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-poorcrime.htm

Summary

The upper class commits far more crime than the lower class. Street criminals stole $15.3 billion in 1993, but white collar-criminals embezzled $200 billion. Street criminals murdered 23,271 people in year 1993 ( 12,253 in year 2013, 86% committed by normal law abiding people), but the decisions of profit-driven corporations murdered at least 318,368

Religion, in the name of being a "Good Guy" has killed more people than those they accuse of being "Bad Guy".

* 250 million murdered in the name of Christianity over the past nearly 2,000 years.

* 270 million non-believers were murdered by Muslim jihadists over the last 1400 years.

* Prior to Christianity the Hebrew religion Genocided the people of the land that they now call Israel, and the killings continue even unto this day. Many numerous genocides throughout the world acting for Judaism.

Governments murdered 262 million unarmed people in mass killings ("democide") during the 20th century.

U.S. Has Killed More Than 20 to 30 Million People in 37 "Victim Nations" Since World War II.

U.S. kills 60% to 90% unarmed noncombatant civilians in its wars.

U.S. kills 50% to 90% of its own troops, and allies from Friendly Fire.

U.S. Holds the World Record of Killings of Innocent Civilians.

U.S. Govt, and its States are a criminal govt commiting war crimes; violates its own Laws; violates the Constitution; violates International Laws, etc....

*******

Based on New 2011 FBI Data:

https://sites.google.com/site/nodakwc/domestic-violence-scam/FBI%20Family%20Murder%202011%20relation-%20weapon.rtf?attredirects=0&d=1

Total US Murders, year 2011:

14% Felons
12% Immediate Family
47% Non- Felons
38% Unknown

A "Normal" "Law-Abiding" person is 3 to 6 times more likely to commit Murder than a hardened criminal.

A "Normal" person is 10 times more likely to commit Murder than the mentally ill.

You are 3.5 times more likely to be shot & killed by a Cop than you are from another Citizen based on an equivalent per 100,000 population.

Mental Illness accounts for 10% of all homocides,

and Felons account for 14% of all homocides.

Combined they account for only

1/4th of all homocides.

That means that

3/4th of all homocides are committed by

Normal Law-Abiding Citizens.

We’re too quick to link violence to psychiatric disorders

http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/letters/2015/10/05/too-quick-link-violence-psychiatric-disorders/uin8ZAsEFRiDIoFvCDwgPO/story.html

People with severe mental illness account for only about 5 percent of violent crimes in the United States, and only about 10 percent of homicides. In the latter case, coexisting substance abuse and inadequate treatment are usually the critical factors.

--Dr. Ronald Pies,

Lexington psychiatrist

Tufts University School of Medicine

Less than 5% of all firearm killings are from mental ill...

The facts on mass shootings in the United States

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/nov/08/facts-mass-shootings-united-states/

Mental instability is not a good predictor of mass shootings....less than 5 percent of 120,000 gun-related killings in America between 2001 and 2010 were committed by people with a diagnosed mental illness....

If family violence 12% were included with

felons 14%, and mental illness 10% the combined total is only 1/3rd of all Murders.

That means that 2/3rd's of all the U.S. Murderers would still pass a background check and could legally purchase a firearm.

(Factoring in wrongful convictions of innocents with a criminal record, and the true guilty with no record, a background check becomes useless and will only cause the innocent to become disarmed while the true guilty will legally pass background checks. This will allow those most likely to cause murder to do it with ease.)

93% of all total violent crimes do not involve firearms.

Only 7% of all total violent crimes involved a firearm.

Only 2% of family violence involved a firearm.

Nonfatal firearm and nonfirearm violence, by victim-offender relationship, 2007–2011 Table 6:

Firearm Violence, 1993-2011

http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fv9311.pdf

% of Total Violence (rounded)

Firearm Non-Firearm

Total 7% 93%

Non-Stranger 5% 95%

Intimate 4% 96%

Other Relative 7% 93%

Friend/Aquaintance 4% 96%

Stranger 11% 89%

Unknown 10% 90%

Intimate Partner Violence: Attributes of Victimization, 1993–2011

https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/ipvav9311.pdf

2002 to 2011:

FEMALE VICTIM: (Table 5)

Female intimate partner victimizations resulted in serious physical injury 13%

Internal injuries, unconsciousness, and broken bones accounted for about 5%

Sexual violence accounted for 7%

Bruises, cuts, and other injuries accounted for 46%

Hit by an object their intimate partner held or threw at them 5%

Shot at, stabbed, or hit with a weapon 4%

Gunshot and Knife wounds accounted for 1%

MALE VICTIM: (Table 5)

Male intimate partner victimizations resulted in a physical injury 44%

Serious physical injury. 5%

Bruises, cuts, and other injuries accounted for 41%

Hit by an object their intimate partner held or threw at them 19%

Shot at, stabbed, or hit with a weapon 8%

Gunshot and knife wounds accounted for 2%

* * *

Firearm Deaths Comparison of

Cops vs. Citizens in USA (2015):

(Based on an equivalent per 100,000 population:)

Cops kill Citizens by firearm at a rate of 3.5 times more than citizens kill another citizen by firearm.

Cops kill Citizens by firearm at a rate of 1,000 times more than citizens kill cops by firearm.

Police killing citizens by firearm:

121 deaths per 100,000 police officers

Citizens killing citizens by firearm :

35 deaths per 100,000 citizens

Citizen killing Police Officers by firearm:

0.121 deaths per 100,000 citizens

Comparison must be based on a 100,000 population basis of Cops and Citizens.

In 2015 there are 0.9 Million Cops in USA, and 321.4 Million Citizens.

There are more than 900,000 sworn law enforcement officers now serving in the United States, which is the highest figure ever. Approximately 90% of the Cops killing Citizens were by Firearm. Cops killed at least 1,205 Citizens in 2015:

1,205 x 90% = 1,085 death by firearm

1,085 Police killings of citizens by firearm in 2015: 1,085 / 9 = 121

Police killing citizens, firearm: 121 deaths per 100,000 police officers

The United States population in 2013 was: 316,500,000

Firearm used in Homicide in 2013 11,208

Citizens killing citizens, firearm: 35 deaths per 100,000 citizens

Police officer shooting deaths in 2015: 39

The United States population in 2015 was: 321,442,019

Citizen killing Police Officers, firearm: 0.121 deaths per 100,000 citizens

0.90 Million Cops killed 1,085 Citizens by firearms (2015).

321.4 Million Citizens killed 39 Cops by firearms (2015).

316.5 Million Citizens killed 11,208 Citizens by firearms (2013).

Law Enforcement represent only 0.28% of the USA Population but, account for nearly 10% of all non-suicide Firearm Shooting Deaths against the USA Citizenry. Nearly 1 out of every 10 firearms shooting death is caused by Law Enforcement shooting a USA Citizen. Many of the police involved shootings the citizen is unarmed, and often has committed no crime. While many other shooting deaths were avoidable if alternative strategies were employed.

* * *

Armed police commit more crimes than armed citizens:

These Gun Owners Are Least Likely Criminals, Report Finds

http://dailysignal.com/2016/08/09/these-gun-owners-are-least-likely-criminals-report-finds

“We find that permit holders are convicted of misdemeanors and felonies at less than a sixth the rate for police officers,” the report says. “Among police, firearms violations occur at a rate of 16.5 per 100,000 officers. Among permit holders in Florida and Texas, the rate is only 2.4 per 100,000. That is just one-seventh of the rate for police officers.”...

“In 2014, the seven states that allowed concealed carry without a permit had much lower rates of murder and violent crime than did the seven jurisdictions with the lowest percentage of permit holders,” the Crime Prevention Research Center report reads. “Indeed, the murder rate was 31 percent lower in the states not requiring permits. The violent crime rate was 28 percent lower. Compared to the rest of the country, the 25 states with the highest rates of permit-holding experienced markedly lower rates of murder and violent crime.”...

A 2014 Gallup poll found 63 percent believed gun ownership made them safer, compared to 35 percent in 2000.

Violent Felons in Large Urban Counties

Office of Justice Programs July 2006

http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/vfluc.pdf

Pg2. Table 1. Felony convictions in the 75 largest counties, by most serious conviction charge, selected months, 1990-2002

When you dissect the total "Felony" cases only 18% of all the felonies were considered violent offenses. 82% of all Felony cases were Non-violent.

And when you further dissect "Violent" cases:

Just 6% of non-family violence involved a firearm.

Only 2% of family violence involved a firearm.

A weapon was used in 21% of non-family violence.

A weapon was used in 16% of family violence.

Total domestic violence deaths from immediate family member (both sexes) accounted for just 0.078% of all Total Deaths in USA for 2013.

All firearm homicides were only 0.43% (half a percent) of all 2013 USA Deaths.

Most of the violent crimes involve only hands/feet, knives, blunt object, vehicular, involuntary manslaughter, negligent or reckless homicide, cruelty, reckless endangerment, intimidation, and extortion, wrongful convictions, etc....

The least of all violent felonies is murder representing only 0.6% (about half a percent) of all felony cases.

Felony convictions in the 75 largest counties (1990-2002):

Drug offenses 38%

Property offenses 32.7%

Violent offenses 18.2%

Public-order offenses 10.3%

Most serious - Felony convictions

conviction charge Number Percent

All offenses 180,298 100.0%

Drug offenses 69,053 38.3%

Trafficking 35,341 19.6
Other drug 33,712 18.7

Property offenses 59,026 32.7%

Burglary 16,878 9.4
Larceny/theft 17,827 9.9
Motor vehicle theft 6,121 3.4
Forgery 5,197 2.9
Fraud 4,021 2.2
Other property 8,981 5.0

Violent offenses 32,784 18.2%

Murder 1,077 0.6
Rape 1,987 1.1
Robbery 10,120 5.6
Assault 12,950 7.2
Other violent 6,650 3.7

Public-order offenses 18,533 10.3%

Weapons 6,905 3.8
Driving-related 6,360 3.5
Other public-order 5,268 2.9

Unclassified felonies 902 0.5%

VIOLENT CRIME = BANNING BILL OF RIGHTS. BY CLASSIFYING CRIMES AS VIOLENT ALLOWS THE DOMESTIC ENEMIES TO "LEGALLY" USURP THE CONSTITUTION BECUZ THEY MAKE THE LAWS THAT ALLOW THEM TO DO SO.

Many “Violent Offenders” Have Committed Nonviolent Crimes

https://www.themarshallproject.org/2019/04/03/when-violent-offenders-commit-nonviolent-crimes

Yet in reality, many of the “violent offenders” in U.S. prisons are there for crimes that not everyone would classify as violent.... you can get charged and convicted as a violent criminal in more than a dozen states if you enter a dwelling that’s not yours. That might seem like a property crime, but it’s often deemed a violent one: burglary.

Similarly, purse snatching is considered a “violent” offense in several states. So are the manufacture of methamphetamines and theft of drugs.... In Kentucky, committing “Possession of Anhydrous Ammonia in an Unapproved Container with Intent to Manufacture Methamphetamine” a second time puts you in a “violent” category under the law—and you’ll face 20 to 50 years in prison. In Minnesota, aiding an attempted suicide is listed as violent, as is marijuana possession (depending on the amount). In North Carolina, trafficking a stolen identity and selling drugs within 1,000 feet of a school or playground are both violent crimes, according to the state’s “habitual violent offender” statute. And in New York, it’s deemed a violent felony to simply possess a loaded gun illegally—with “loaded” defined as simply being in possession of bullets. These crimes differ from ones like accidental vehicular homicide or “felony murder,” in which the perpetrator never intended to hurt or kill someone but still did, or participated in doing so....

Moreover, prosecutors often "up-charge," too—for example, they may charge the act of getting into a bar fight as “assault with intent to kill,” or say that holding someone up with a squirt gun is armed robbery.... “Burglary just means entering a structure with the ‘intent’ to commit some kind of crime therein—even if you step right back out and nothing else happens,” he said. “It’s just going inside; anything you do additionally, like robbery, would be charged as an additional offense.”... only about 3 percent of the millions of burglaries that take place every year involve any actual violence against a human being....

Is Burglary a Violent Crime? An Empirical Investigation of the Armed Career Criminal Act’s Classification of Burglary as a Violent Felony

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0887403416684594?journalCode=cjpa&%20https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/323/=&

Results showed that burglary is overwhelmingly a non-violent offense. The national incidence of actual violence or threats of violence during a burglary was 7.9%. At most, 2.7% of burglaries involved actual acts of violence....

* * *

PROHIBITION OF MARIJUANA = 50% OF ALL HOMICIDES = 6,127 HOMICIDES + 1,160 POLICE KILLINGS =

7,287 TOTAL DEATHS BY PROHIBITION OF MARIJUANA (YEAR 2013)

Want to reduce gun violence? Halt the war on drugs

http://www.newsweek.com/want-reduce-gun-violence-halt-war-drugs-488879

Every December 5, American beer, wine and spirit enthusiasts celebrate Repeal Day. It was on this day in 1933 that the United States officially passed the 21st Amendment, effectively ending the failed “noble experiment” known as Prohibition. This was not only a good day for liberty and libations; it also marked the end of a violent era in American history. The transport and sale of illicit booze became a prolific criminal enterprise backed by well-armed, violent gangs. The result: a homicide rate in the United States that steadily climbed between 1920 and 1933. In addition, the rise of “victimless crimes”—namely, consumption or possession of alcohol—added to the already overburdened judicial system. Furthermore, alcohol consumption—what Prohibition laws sought to minimize—actually increased nearly 70 percent. To call Prohibition a failure would be an understatement. Repealing Prohibition destroyed the monopoly on alcohol maintained by organized crime. Disempowering the black market produced a noticeable decline in the homicide rate. In fact, homicides continued to diminish each year for 11 years straight....

If concerned citizens want to get serious about reducing gun violence, they should be encouraged to focus less on policies that are ineffective—“assault weapons” bans, gun buyback programs and outright confiscation—and focus more on ending our failed, four-decade-long, overly militarized, trillion-dollar battle against narcotics.... 2014 mass shooting incidents resulted in the deaths of 383 people—about 3 percent of total gun homicides for the year. ... Though difficult to quantify due to inconsistent reporting, estimates of drug-related homicides reach as high as 50 percent of the total homicides in the United States. ... Despite the increase in population, Denver police reports indicate a drop in overall crime, including a 24 percent drop in reported homicides.... The Independence Institute examined arrest and homicide rates throughout the 20th century and concluded that the greatest contributor to violence is “a violent black market caused by the War on Drugs today, and Prohibition in the 1920s.”...

A Terrible Investment: Even if we ignored the violence inherent in this failed policy, the war on drugs would still be considered a complete waste of public resources. The United States has invested close to a trillion dollars in drug-related law enforcement over the past four decades. And what was the return on investment? A black market valued at $100 billion annually and a drug use rate that is the highest in the world....

Number of murder victims by gender in the United States 2013:

Total 12,253

Male 9,523

Female 2,707

Number of murder victims by gender in the United States 2013, DRUG RELATED PROHIBITION:

TOTAL: 12,253 X 50% = 6,127

MALE: 9,523 X 50% = 4,762

FEMALE: 2,707 X 50% = 1,354

IN ADDITION TO STREET CRIME CAUSED BY PROHIBITION MOST POLICE KILLINGS ARE CAUSED BY PROHIBITION DIRECTLY AND INDIRECTLY.

Number of people killed by U.S. Police

in 2014 (minimum): 1,112

in 2015 (minimum): 1,213

in 2016 (minimum) 1,156

3 year average minimum 1,160

SOURCE: https://sites.google.com/site/nodakwc/domestic-violence-scam/the-numb-ers

New York Police Chief Says Spike In Homicides Was Caused By Marijuana

https://thinkprogress.org/new-york-police-chief-says-spike-in-homicides-was-caused-by-marijuana-8f60af170a6a/

Police Chief Bill Bratton blames the 17 percent increase on pot.... “In this city, people are killing each other over marijuana more so than anything that we had to deal with in the ’80s and ’90s with heroin and cocaine,” Robert Boyce, the city’s Chief of Detectives, shared a similar sentiment, arguing that ripoffs of marijuana dealers and pot-related robberies are largely responsible for the homicide rate....

“If, indeed, there is violence in the illicit marijuana marketplace between those who are selling marijuana, there is one very basic and smart way to solve that problem: end marijuana prohibition,”... Despite the rise in homicides, serious crime dropped 11 percent in the last two months mirroring rates from the 1990s.

GUBMINT IS THE PROBLEM, NOT THE SOLUTION. GUBMINT = VIOLENCE

Prohibition = Violence

http://reason.com/archives/2003/01/29/prohibition-violence

The low, dishonest, and expensive Drug War advertising campaign being waged by the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) in all the major newspapers, television networks, and leading magazines is let's be as honest as they are not, full of crap....

1900 The murder rate was 1.2 per 100,000 people.

1914, Congress passed the Harrison Narcotic Act that essentially banned the non-medical sale of opiates and cocaine derivatives.

1915 the murder rate the year after was 5.9 per 100,000.

1920, outlawing the sale of all alcoholic beverages.

1921, the murder rate in America jumped to 8.1 per 100,000. Of course, the 1920s were the era of gangsters and bootleggers.

1933, passed the 21st Amendment repealing Prohibition. The murder rate that year reached 9.7 per 100,000. After Prohibition, the murder rate began to drift downward, dropping to 4.5 per 100,000 in 1958.

1970, when Congress passed the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act, the murder rate had risen back to 8.3 per 100,000. In 1971, President Richard Nixon declared that drugs were the "No. 1 Public Enemy" and announced the beginning of a new "War on Drugs."

1973, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) was established. As the Drug War heated up, the murder rate reached an all-time high of 10.7 per 100,000 in 1980.

1986, Anti-Drug Abuse Act which mandated harsher penalties for drug possession and drug trafficking. As tens of billions of dollars were poured into the War on Drugs by Presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton, the murder rate hovered between 8.5 and 10.5 for the next 15 years. The murder rate began dropping in the mid-1990s and is now at levels last seen in the mid-1960s. Is the Drug War finally working at cutting that violence that we are assured is commensurate with drug use?

Well, in a way, but not the way the feds' drugs=violence equation implies. Most likely it is because the United States now has nearly 2 million people in jail or prison. It would have to be a pretty poor policing operation if, in the course of sweeping up some 1.5 million people annually for drug use, that those offenders most likely to act violently did not end up incarcerated....

Even if putting hundreds of thousands of people behind bars does lower violent crime rates, legalization would get the same results—and far more cheaply in both human and monetary costs. Violent crime, terrorism, and the Drug War go hand in hand.

Table 13: Murder Circumstances

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-13

Total- Total- Non-

Total Male Female Unknown Firearms Firearms

12,664 9,829 2,813 22 8,583 4,081

Felony type Total Murder Victims

1,816 1,504 307 5 1,271 545

Rape 15 0 15 0

Robbery 734 653 80 1

Burglary 92 67 25 0

Larceny-

theft 11 9 2 0

Motor-

vehicle-

theft 23 12 11 0

Arson 37 22 14 1

Prostitution-

and-

commercialized-

vice 3 2 1 0

Other-

sex-

offenses 9 3 6 0

Narcotic-

drug-

laws 390 358 30 2

Gambling 8 7 1 0

Other-

not-

specified 494 371 122 1

Suspected-

felony-

type 60 43 17 0

Other than felony type total

5,976 4,342 1,627 7 3,684 2,292

Romantic-

triangle 85 63 22 0

Child-

killed-

by-

babysitter 39 25 14 0

Brawl due to influence-

of alcohol 111 97 14 0

Brawl due to influence-

of narcotics 115 99 16 0

Argument over money-

or property 155 134 21 0

Other-

arguments 3,128 2,235 891 2

Gangland-

killings 150 140 10 0

Juvenile-

gang-

killings 523 502 21 0

Institutional-

killings 22 22 0 0

Sniper attack 1 1 0 0

Other-

not-

specified 1,647 1,024 618 5

Unknown 4,812 3,940 862 10

Males are murdered 2.5 times more often than females in Non-felony cases, and

Males are murdered nearly 5 times more often than females in felony cases.

Males account for 78% of all murder victims, and

Females account for 22% of all murder victims.

Crime in the US 2011 - Expanded Homicide Data

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded/expanded-homicide-data

Felony circumstances (rape, robbery, burglary, etc.) accounted for 23.1 percent of murders.

77% of all murders are committed by Law abiding citizens.

Unknown homicide = 44.1%

Other Known homicide = 30.3%

Family homicide = 13.8%.

Female= 886

Male= 587

Stranger homicide = 11.7%

Murder Circumstances by Weapon, 2011 - Table 11

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-11

Total- Total-

Firearms (%) Non-Firearms (%)

Total: 8,583 4,081

Felony type -

Total Murder

Victims: 1,271 15% 545 13%

Other than

felony-type: 3,684 43% 2,292 56%

Law-Abiding citizens used Firearms nearly 3 times more often than felons did to commit their murders,

and Law-Abiding citizens used Non-firearms (knives, blunt instr., hands/feet, etc...) more than 4 times more often than felons.

How People Are Murdered in the United States

http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2012/12/how-people-are-murdered-in-united-states.html

Despite news media impressions to the contrary, there are not many murders in the United States that are committed with rifles or shotguns. Combined, it is under 1,000 per year---more people are murdered with knives.

FBI data shows that most murders are done with handguns. Random killings are very rare, most are between people who know each other or rival gang members. In other words, stay out of bad areas, such as parts of Rahmaland, and your chance of being killed by a stranger is very, very slim. Further data to contemplate: In 32% of the murders in 2010, no firearm was used at all.

Weapons 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Total 15,087 14,916 14,224 13,752 12,996

Total-

firearms: 10,225 10,129 9,528 9,199 8,775

Handguns 7,836 7,398 6,800 6,501 6,009

Rifles 438 453 380 351 358

Shotguns 490 457 442 423 373

Other guns 107 116 81 96 96

Firearms type-

not stated 1,354 1,705 1,825 1,828 1,939

Knives or-

cutting instr. 1,830 1,817 1,888 1,836 1,704

Blunt objects-

(clubs, hammers, etc....)

618 647 603 623 540

Personal weapons

(hands, fists, feet, etc....)

841 869 875 817 745

Poison 12 10 9 7 11

Explosives 1 1 11 2 4

Fire 117 131 85 98 74

Narcotics 48 52 34 52 39

Drowning 12 12 16 8 10

Strangulation 137 134 89 122 122

Asphyxiation 106 109 87 84 98

Other weapons or weapons

not stated 1,140 1,005 999 904 874

The above data has a degree of error based on law enforcement reporting. Some reported murders are actually self defense, accidental, etc while some self defense, and accidents are actually murder.

Homicide Type by Urbanicity, 1976-2005

http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htius.pdf

(Percent of all homicides)

Large city Small city Suburban Rural

All homicides: 57.3% 11.5% 21.0% 10.2%

Victim/offender-

relationship

Intimate 40.7% 14.5% 28.0% 16.8%

Family 38.7% 13.2% 29.1% 19.0%

Infanticide 47.9% 15.0% 25.5% 11.6%

Eldercide 46.9% 13.5% 24.2% 15.3%

Circumstance

Felony murder 61.0% 11.1% 20.3% 7.7%

Sex related 48.4% 12.2% 27.2% 12.2%

Drug related 67.4% 9.9% 18.1% 4.5%

Gang related 69.3% 13.1% 16.9% 0.7%

Argument 53.4% 12.7% 21.0% 12.9%

Workplace 31.4% 13.4% 37.2% 17.9%

Weapon

Gun homicide 59.3% 10.6% 19.8% 10.4%

Arson 54.8% 13.1% 21.7% 10.4%

Poison 38.9% 15.7% 29.3% 16.0%

Multiple victims or offenders

Multiple victims 47.4% 11.9% 27.0% 13.7%

Multiple offenders61.7% 10.2% 19.1% 8.9%

Homicides by Location Type

Source: FBI, Supplementary

Homicide Reports, 1976-2005.

http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htius.pdf

Year Large-city Small-city Suburban Rural

1976 9,860 2,297 3,954 2,669

...

2005 9,513 2,158 3,722 1,299

Homicide in the U.S. known to law enforcement, 2011

http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/hus11.pdf

Page 11 - 12 Rural and other community type homicide comparisons

Page 13 Homicides involving a firearm, by victim sex, community type, and firearm type, 2011

Table 3 Weapon use in homicides, by victim sex and community type, 2011

Fig 19 Homicide rate, by community type, 1992–2011

Some Data to consider about firearms and crime (USA 1980-2008):

* On average handguns are used most often in homicides (8,000 to 14,000 homicides by handguns) at a rate about 3 times more than any other weapon. Knives, and other guns are the second weapons of choice (2,000 to 4,000 homicides each).

So why the push against assault rifles?

* 76.6% of the homicides were commited by people less than 35 years of age.

* Blacks were disproportionately represented as both homicide victims and offenders. The victimization rate for blacks (27.8 per 100,000) was 6 times higher than the rate for whites (4.5 per 100,000). The offending rate for blacks (34.4 per 100,000) was almost 8 times higher than the rate for whites (4.5 per 100,000)(table 1).

* Males represented 89.5% of the homicides.

* Homocide Weapon of choice varies by race. Blacks more likely to kill using guns, whereas Whites represent higher arson, and poison homocides.

Gun homicides: 41.2% Whites, 56.9% Blacks

Arson: 55.6% Whites, 41.7% Blacks

Poison: 80.6% Whites, 16.8% Blacks

* 84% of white victims were killed by whites.

16% of white victims were killed by non-whites.

93% of black victims were killed by blacks.

7% of black victims were killed by non-blacks.

Source: Homicide Trends in the United States, 1980-2008

U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs

Bureau of Justice Statistics November 2011, NCJ 236018

http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=2221

U.S. cities as bad as deadliest 3rd World countries

www.wnd.com/2013/02/u-s-cities-as-dangerous-as-deadliest-3rd-world-countries/#PC2wj8zETiztGq9J.99

...gun murders in the U.S. are concentrated in big cities that typically have the strictest gun-control regulations.

Can a "good guy with a gun" stop a mass shooting? The Daily Show put it to the test.

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2015/12/11/9891664/daily-show-mass-shootings

On Thursday, The Daily Show's Jordan Klepper put the theory to the test. He trained on the basics of using a firearm and got a concealed carry permit that's valid in 30 states. Then he participated in mass shooting simulations to see how, exactly, he would hold up in such a scenario.

He failed. Miserably. In his final test, which simulated a school shooting, he shot an unarmed civilian, and he was shot multiple times by the active shooters and even law enforcement, who mistook him for the bad guy.

He never took down the active shooters.

The Daily Show - Jordan Klepper: Good Guy with a Gun

https://youtu.be/MCI4bUk4vuM

Hardened Criminals and Mental illness are NOT the majority of murderers:

Gerald D. Robin, writing for the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, notes that, unlike ordinary gun owners, "the average murderer turns out to be no less hardened a criminal than the average robber or burglar."

Katherine Christoffel has said: "[M]ost shootings are not committed by felons or mentally ill people, but are acts of passion that are committed using a handgun that is owned for home protection."

"The overwhelming majority of people who shoot to kill are not convicted felons; in fact, most would be considered law-abiding citizens prior to their pulling the trigger."...

"[B]y focusing policy on known criminals, the government ignores the role that gun availability plays in suicides and unintentional shootings, which together constitute almost 60 percent of all gun-related deaths."

--- Webster, Daniel W., C. Patrick Chaulk, Stephen P. Teret, and Garen J. Wintemute. "Reducing Firearm Injuries." Issues in Science and Technology. Spring 1991, p.73.

(Kleck and Bordua conservatively estimate that only 25% of homicide offenders have prior felony convictions. [Kleck, Gary and David J. Bordua. 1983. The factual foundations for certain key assumptions of gun control. Law and Policy Quarterly 5. p. 293.])

Some studies cite that the majority of murders are being committed by the hardened repeat offenders with criminal records. They cite data given from research conducted in large urban counties. The 68 largest cities accounted for 42% of reported homicides which house only 18% of the U.S. population. (Homicide figures obtained from 2001 FBI Uniform Crime Report, p. 201.)

Also from the report: "In 1998, the 75 largest counties accounted for 37% of the U.S. population. According to the FBI's Uniform Crime Reports program for 1998, these jurisdictions accounted for 50% of all reported serious violent crimes in the United States."

Even within these large cities and counties many murders, and other serious crimes are unsolved so it cannot be stated if those offenders had any prior criminal record.

According to government reports the majority of murders are committed by young black males (less than 35 years old) in large urban cities. Many of these impoverished inner-city males resort to drug dealing, crime, and gangs for money. So naturally they would have prior criminal records.

So to the casual observer of these reports it would appear that murders would be committed by any person with a prior criminal record located all throughout the United States. While in reality the majority of murders occurs in large urban areas by young black males. Thus, gun control should not expand its efforts to include the population of people not fitting the true description.

Blacks were disproportionately represented as both homicide victims and offenders. The victimization rate for blacks (27.8 per 100,000) was 6 times higher than the rate for whites (4.5 per 100,000). The offending rate for blacks (34.4 per 100,000) was almost 8 times higher than the rate for whites (4.5 per 100,000)

Source: Homicide Trends in the United States, 1980-2008 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics November 2011, NCJ 236018

http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=2221

The FBI's definition of acquaintance and domestic homicide requires only that the murderer knew or was related to the decedent. That dueling drug dealers are acquainted does not make them "friends." Over three-quarters of murderers have long histories of violence against not only their enemies and other "acquaintances," but also against their relatives. This form of reporting can be misleading.

As Eugene Volokh explains, "criminals have relatives, friends, and acquaintances, too (and of course 'acquaintance' can describe many sorts of acquaintances -- drug dealers are acquainted with their customers, gang members are acquainted with their rivals, and prostitutes are acquainted with their patrons). Yes, if you are acquainted with lots of criminals, you might fall victim to an acquaintance murder by one of those criminals.

Although such information is seldom available, one survey found that assault victims with criminal histories knew the suspect almost twice as often as victims having no criminal history (73% vs. 39%).

Sptizer also states that "More than a quarter of all women murdered were killed by boy friends or husbands." Although it's true that the majority of offenders in intimate realtionship killings do not have a criminal record.

No person, nor any current technology can predict who and when someone may commit murder. To say everyone with a prior criminal record is violent, and should be banned from firearms is inaccurate, as well as Un-Constitutional.

And when you add in at least a 12% Wrongful Conviction Rate in America that unfairly bans Innocent citizens from their Bill of Rights many more innocent people are being deprived of their natural Rights.

As Thomas Jefferson said: "False is the idea of utility...that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils, except destruction (of liberty). The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...such laws serve rather to encourage than to prevent homocides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."

We’re too quick to link violence to psychiatric disorders

http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/letters/2015/10/05/too-quick-link-violence-psychiatric-disorders/uin8ZAsEFRiDIoFvCDwgPO/story.html

People with severe mental illness account for only about 5 percent of violent crimes in the United States, and only about 10 percent of homicides. In the latter case, coexisting substance abuse and inadequate treatment are usually the critical factors.

--Dr. Ronald Pies,

Lexington psychiatrist

Tufts University School of Medicine

Less than 5% of all firearm killings are from mental ill...

The facts on mass shootings in the United States

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/nov/08/facts-mass-shootings-united-states/

Physiology, sociology and murder: a scientist looks at violence in America http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2002/04/base-a17.html

The results of this research, which Pincus details in his book, are striking. Of the 150 people studied, 94 percent had experienced severe physical and sexual abuse as children, including 13 of the 14 who were on death row at time they were interviewed....

To his credit, Pincus comes down decidedly on the side of changing the conditions that produce violence, as opposed to the contemporary one-sided focus on either individual treatment or punishment, which have far less potential for beneficial results....

Professor Conducted A Huge Study To Find Out Why People Kill

http://www.businessinsider.com/why-people-kill-2013-2

"Though we might like to think that murderers are either pathological misfits or hardened criminals who," Buss told UT, "the vast majority of murders are committed by people who until the day they kill, seem perfectly normal."

In Gun Debate, a Misguided Focus on Mental Illness

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/18/health/a-misguided-focus-on-mental-illness-in-gun-control-debate.html?_r=0

Mass Murder: Is There a Mental Health Issue?

http://socialwork.columbia.edu/news-events/mass-murder-there-mental-health-issue

Synopsis - Murder By Proxy Film

murderbyproxyfilm.com/synopsis.php

Most people don't realize that in the overwhelming majority of cases people who commit these murders have no criminal record or history of mental illness.

Predicting the Risk of Future Dangerousness

http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2012/06/hlaw1-1206.html

Research, in fact, confirms the error in associating dangerousness with mental illness, showing that “the vast majority of people who are violent do not suffer from mental illnesses [8]. The absolute risk of violence among the mentally ill as a group is still very small and…only a small proportion of the violence in our society can be attributed to persons who are mentally ill” [4]. Violence is not a diagnosis nor is it a disease [9]. Potential to do harm is not a symptom or a sign of mental illness, rather it must be the central consideration when assessing future dangerousness.

Dangerous weapons or dangerous people? The temporal associations between gun violence and mental health.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30711465

Despite the public, political, and media narrative that mental health is at the root of gun violence, evidence is lacking to infer a causal link. This study examines the temporal associations between gun violence (i.e., threatening someone with a gun and gun carrying) and mental health (i.e., anxiety, depression, stress, PTSD, hostility, impulsivity, and borderline personality disorder) as well the cross-sectional associations with gun access and gun ownership in a group of emerging adults....

Counter to public beliefs, the majority of mental health symptoms examined were not related to gun violence. Instead, access to firearms was the primary culprit.

"Who is really mentally ill.

As to be well adjusted to a sick society is no measure of ones health." - Allan Free

A comment from a neighbor of a killer who knew that person very well for years but, never knew that person was a killer:

"He seemed so nice. He had a good job, a good family, great personality. He always helped people, and was active in the community. I never would have believed he could kill anyone. He didn't look like a killer." What does a killer look like?

Quotes about killing:

http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/killing

A Circle of Distortion:

The Social Construction of Mass Murder in the United States

https://sites.google.com/site/nodakwc/home/gun-rights/duwe.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1

by Grant Duwe - Minnesota Department of Corrections

...Using the FBI’s Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR) and newspaper, network television news, and newsweekly magazine coverage as sources of data, this study examines why and how mass murder was constructed as a new crime problem. I suggest that the news media have figured prominently in the social construction of mass murder by heavily influencing which cases claimsmakers have selected as landmark narratives and, more generally, as typifying examples. Because claimsmakers have relied almost exclusively on national news coverage as a source of data, they have made a number of questionable claims about the prevalence and nature of mass murder since the high-profile cases represent the most sensational and least representative mass killings.

...the news media have completed the circle of distortion by disseminating the bulk of the claims that have been made, leading to policies that have targeted the rarest aspects about mass murder.

...The findings presented in this study show that the news media have had a decisive influence on the social construction of mass murder. This influence, however, has led to a number of distorted claims. The distortion emanates from the news media’s financial obligation to attract as many consumers as possible in order to turn a profit, which involves selecting informative yet entertaining stories for presentation. With respect to crime news, the emphasis on the unusual and the melodramatic has produced an overrepresentation of violent, interpersonal crimes and an underrepresentation of the far more prevalent property and white-collar crime. But with mass murder, the distortion results not so much from whether incidents get reported—since almost all receive at least local coverage—but from the extent to which they get reported. Although the nationally-publicized mass killings are more familiar to both claimsmakers and the general public, they are the least representative examples of mass murder. Those making claims about mass murder, however, have not demonstrated an awareness of the ways in which the celebrated cases are biased as a sample of mass murder in general. Therefore, by uncritically using the atypical high-profile cases, claimsmakers have made a number of questionable assertions, which have, in turn, led to policy proposals that have targeted rare aspects of mass murder such as assault weapon use and workplace and school violence. And the news media have been the chief means through which these claims have been promulgated, thus completing the circle of distortion.

65 Million “Need Not Apply,” The Case for Reforming Criminal Background Checks for Employment:

http://csgjusticecenter.org/nrrc/publications/65-million-need-not-apply-the-case-for-reforming-criminal-background-checks-for-employment/

"more than one in four U.S. adults -- roughly 65 million people --have an arrest or conviction record"

Gun Control is largely based on inaccurate data, and misrepresentative reports from large urban centers. These reports indicate that roughly half of the murder offenders, and murder victims had prior arrest records.

First of all, in large urban areas where the economy is impoverishing people crime would naturally be higher for survival. Secondly, at least a quarter of the entire U.S. adult population has a prior arrest record preventing them from obtaining legitimate employment.

Furthermore, with more than one in four U.S. adults -- roughly 65 million people --having an arrest or conviction record, the chances are quite likely that a murderer or a victim will have a prior record. It is reasonable to say that as you increase the number of people with prior arrests the probability increases that any person with a record doing anything will also increase.

With one in four adults having a criminal record it is equally quite likely to say that your neighbor has a criminal record, or your family member has a criminal record so therefore firearms should be banned in your home, and in the homes of your neighbors.

With more laws being made, and the economy in decline, competition on the rise in all sectors of society, and wrongful convictions increasing will in fact increase the number of people with criminal records.

And with so many laws on the books the odds of any person "not" breaking a law is unimagineable. If you do not have a criminal record you have either not been caught yet, or through selective prosecution, plea bargaining, and/or other official misconducts you have been spared.

When considering the founding of America the framers were obviously viewed by the British as criminals because the framers went against British policies. Which led to the Revolution against such governmental tyranny. The founding religion of America was Christianity. Christianity was founded by Jesus Christ whom society of that time declared a criminal, and gave the death sentence. And all the disciples of Christianity were declared criminals, and all given death sentences, or exiled.

So gun control aimed against criminals is very deceptive, and misleading as well as Un-Constitutional and treasonous to America. Living with so many laws "all" are criminals, and not one of you can throw the first stone.

* * *

Federal firearm denials top of the list is felons (sentencing beyond a year).

Felons make up only 14% of all homicides.

86% of all homicides are committed by non-felons (your average law-abiding citizen).

Non-felons commit the most murders, and can pass background checks.

A further breakdown of felons reveal felons are not about murder like Law Abiding citizens are.

Felons just want to get high. It's the Good Guys who want to murder.

Felony convictions in the 75 largest counties1990-2002:

Drug offenses were 38% of felon convictions.

Property offenses 32.7%.

Public-order offenses 10.3%.

Violent offenses 18.2%

When you dissect these total "Felony" cases only 18% of all the felonies in the 75 largest counties were considered violent offenses. 82% of all Felony cases were Non-violent.

In Fact, the least of all violent felonies is murder representing only 0.6% (about half a percent) of all felony cases.

A further consideration is that not all convicted felons are guilty. At least 12% of People convicted of 'Serious' crimes are INNOCENT.

And add in that many guilty people of serious crimes have no criminal record.

The most dangerous person in America, and the most likely to commit murder is the normal law abiding person. Yet, they can pass background checks and legally carry a firearm.

Thus the following quote holds true:

"False is the idea of utility...that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils, except destruction (of liberty). The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...such laws serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."

Thomas Jefferson 'Commonplace Book' 1775

* * *

Police are more dangerous to citizens than criminals

http://www.sott.net/article/280225-Police-are-more-dangerous-to-citizens-than-criminals

Americans face a new crisis: police violence against citizens is escalating, blurring the line between criminal and public servant....

SHOULD A CRIMINAL BE ALLOWED A GUN?

IF you say no then you say a criminal can be denied any one, part, or all of his Rights.

If a citizen can be denied any Right based on the ability of Government to make criminals, and if the intent of these Rights are to protect citizens from tyranny, then what good is having the Bill of Rights in the first place? It becomes pointless and worthless.

What was the original intent of these Rights?

THE AUTHORS OF OUR FREEDOM CHARTER WERE CRIMINALS!

Consider the authors of these Rights were themselves accused of being criminals and terrorists by their Government, the British, who were tyrannizing the people. These Rights reflect protections for the people against abuses from Law, Government, and Public.

So if a criminal can be denied firearms then you are saying that the American Revolution was a criminal act by criminals, and that all American Patriots of the Revolution, and the Framers of our Freedom Charter should not have been allowed firearms.

THE BILL OF RIGHTS WAS WRITTEN TO PROTECT CRIMINALS!

It is clear from reading each Right that these are rights for the criminal. For the law abiding citizen would not even be at trial so would not need any of those Rights protecting from courts. ANd law abiding people don't need rights protecting them from Police abuses but, the accused criminals do. So it is clear that criminals were the intended citizen of many of these Rights. So that the Bill Of Rights were intended to include criminals, as well as every citizen regardless what tyrants call you.

As a political gesture to the Anti-Federalists—a gesture highlighted by the Second Amendment’s prefatory reference to the value of a well-regulated militia—express recognition of the people’s right to arms was something of a sop. The provision was easily accepted, however, because everyone agreed that the federal government should not have the power to infringe the right of the people to keep and bear arms any more than it should have the power to abridge the freedom of speech or prohibit the free exercise of religion.

SO it is clear you cannot exclude criminals from any part of the Bill of Rights.

SHOULD A CRIMINAL BE ALLOWED:

- Freedom of a Religion?
- Freedom of Speech?
- Freedom of the Press?
- Freedom to assemble, and complain about a corrupt Government?
- Freedom to protect his Self and Family?
- Freedom to defend his State and Nation?
- Freedom to defend his Rights?
- Freedom to keep out Soldiers, including Law Enforcement, in his house?
- Freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures?
- Freedom from Warrants without probable cause, and describing the person or things to be search and seized?
- Freedom from a capital offense unless indictment of a Grand Jury?
- Freedom from Double Jeopardy?
- Freedom from self witnessing?
- Freedom from deprivation of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law?
- Freedom from private property taken for public use, without just compensation?
- Freedom to Speedy and Public Trial?
- Freedom to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation?
- Freedom to be confronted with the witnesses against him?
- Freedom to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor?
- Freedom to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense?
- Freedom from Excessive bail?
- Freedom from excessive fines?
- Freedom from cruel and unusual punishments?
- Freedom to retain all these Bill of Rights in its entirety, and not to be denied them, nor reduced in privilege by any other acts, claims, or interpretations?
- Freedom to the Power of the People when not delegated to the USA by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States?

A Yes to any one of the above must be a Yes to all. Because the above are the People's Bill of Rights granted to every American Citizen. The Bill of Rights does not only include Good Guys. The Bill of Rights includes Bad Guys also. In fact, upon close examination it is clear that the Bill of Rights was designed to protect the Bad Guys from the self proclaimed Good Guys. These Rights are protecting citizens from an overbearing Tyrannical Government Authority misusing its Force.

The so called Bad Guy needs protecting from the Good Guys False Accusations against him. And so the Good Guys cannot wrongfully convict the falsely accused Bad Guys, nor falsley arrest him, nor inflict cruel punishments against the Innocent merely because the self proclaimed Good Guys fabricate false crimes against innocents. And when the abuses of the Government powers against the innocent falsely accused Bad Guys get unbearable on the innocent citizen he can freely speak out against the injustices done to him.

To be so sure that all citizens always retain each and every Rights in the Bill of Rights, the 2nd Amendment was included which gives the People equal or greater Force to protect and preserve these Rights from the influences of domestic enemies in Government, Law, or Public.

So if the Bill of Rights is a guarantee of Freedoms for every American, especially for the Bad Guys how can anyone, including Government ban any Right? How can anyone claim that Bad Guys, and Criminals can not have Firearms?

A Bad Guy, or Criminal can not be denied any part of his Bill of Rights. If the intent of the Bill of Rights is to protect the accused Criminal from Government, and malicious people then no one, not even Government can deny any part of the Bill of Rights. IF Government makes, or enforces any such Law that denies any citizen of his Rights then that Government is the criminal. The citizen is then justified to use Lethal Force against the tyrants.

"The powers of the legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken, or forgotten, the constitution is written. To what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing, if these limits may, at any time, be passed by those intended to be restrained?"

Amendment XIV Section 1:...No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

"The Supreme Law of the Land" is "The Constitution as it is written" .

Article VI...This Constitution,

and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof (constitutional laws only);

and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land;

and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

DEMOCRACY IS HYPOCRISY!

If Government can ban certain individuals from one Right they can ban anyone from any and all Rights. Thus, the Bill of Rights were never intended to be banned to anyone for any reason. That is why they are called Rights. Otherwise, they would have been called privileges. And that is why "shall not be infringed" was included.

The Second Amendment and the Inalienable Right to Self-Defense

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/04/the-second-amendment-and-the-inalienable-right-to-self-defense

THE INTENT OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS IS TO PROTECT THE "BAD GUYS" FROM THE "GOOD GUYS".

THE CONSTITUTION WAS NEVER INTENDED TO PROTECT CORRUPT GOVERNMENT FROM THE PEOPLE.

THE CONSTITUTION PROTECTS THE PEOPLE FROM CORRUPT GOVERNMENT.

2ND AMENDMENT IS NOT THE RIGHT TO MURDER ANIMALS FOR SPORT. 2ND AMENDMENT IS THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO SHOOT CRIMINAL GUBMINT TO DEFEND THE CITIZENS RIGHTS OF LIBERTY, PROPERTY, AND LIFE. AND FOR SELF PRESERVATION AGAINST HARM FROM OTHERS AS THE 1ST NATURAL RIGHT.

HUNTERS OF ANIMALS ARE MURDERERS OF PEOPLE....

The Sanitizing of Violence in Our Society

https://www.all-creatures.org/sof/hunt.html

The very expression "avid hunter" means that Weber loved to kill. He apparently saw killing as an acceptable way of expressing himself. He apparently could not differentiate between a "sport" in the woods and fields, and acting out of such aggression in the domestic arena. ... We need to wake up to the fact that hunting, as we know it, is not a sport, but a form of socially acceptable murder.

Animal Cruelty and Domestic Violence

https://aldf.org/article/animal-cruelty-and-domestic-violence/

People who hurt animals don’t stop with animals. There is an established link between cruelty to animals and violence toward humans — regularly referred to as “The Link.”... Ample research backs up the finding that there is a direct link between acts of cruelty to animals and violence toward humans. This includes child abuse, domestic violence, elder abuse and other violent behavior....

Game Hunters are Psychopathic Murderers, and Deceitful Narcissists....

The Psychology and Thrill of Trophy Hunting: Is it Criminal?

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animal-emotions/201510/the-psychology-and-thrill-trophy-hunting-is-it-criminal

“Is killing an animal murder?” was raised. As of today, 58% of the respondents voted “yes” and 42% voted “no.” In addition, "Americans are turning thumbs down on trophy hunting by a two-to-one margin. Sixty-four percent of U.S. voters polled told the Humane Society of the United States that they also oppose trophy hunting in the United States." Definitions of murder invariably exclude nonhumans....“Hunting for ‘sport’ is basically another way to describe the thrill of killing.”...

Dr. Mallett also writes, "Another paper has linked personality traits of some people who hunt for sport to a different 'triad' of behaviours, known ominously as the ‘dark triad’. This includes narcissism (egotistical admiration of one’s own attributes, and a lack of compassion), Machiavellianism (being deceitful, cunning and manipulative) and psychopathy (lack of remorse or empathy, and prone to impulsive behaviour).”...

A HUNTER LOOKS DOWN HIS SIGHTS AND DONT KNOW THE DIFFERNECE BETWEEN A DEER AND A HO HE SHOULDNT BE HUNTING. HE SHOULDNT HAVE GUN EITHER. OR IS IT JUST THE EXCUSE THEY USE TO COVER THEIR MURDER...

History of hunting deaths invites question of reform

https://www.pressherald.com/2019/09/22/history-of-fatal-hunting-incidents-keeps-focus-on-tradition-of-open-access-to-maines-private-lands/

Karen Wood died hanging laundry in her backyard in November 1988. Megan Ripley died walking with her brother behind her family’s home in December 2006. Karen Wrentzel died digging for gemstones on her property in October 2017. Each woman died without knowing a hunter was on her land because he never needed to ask to be there. Each woman died because that hunter thought he saw a deer and shot her instead. Maine has long allowed hunters to use private property without permission unless posted signs explicitly tell them to stay away. The deaths of the three women are flares in the simmering debate about whether that tradition needs to change....But every attempt to rewrite the law to require hunters to get permission has so far failed....

DEER HUNTERS SUFFER FROM ABNORMAL PSYCHOSEXUAL INADEQUACY DUE TO SEXUAL FRUSTRATION GET RELIEF BY KILLING THE FEMININE. DEER HUNTERS ALSO GET RELIEF BY RAPING AND KILLING WOMEN. DEER HUNTERS ARE USUALLY GAY AND MOST SEVERE CASES BECOME TRANSVESTITES. DUE TO THEIR SEXUAL PROBLEMS THEY MUST EXERT POWER AND CONTROL OVER HUMANS AND ANIMALS...

Why hunters hunt––and why far more men quit hunting now than take it up

https://www.animals24-7.org/2020/08/14/killing-the-female-the-psychology-of-the-hunt/

“It turns out the same regions of the brain that are activated in the sex drive and orgasm are also activated by the compulsion to hunt animals.... Abnormal Psychology and Modern Life, which remains the most authoritative survey of abnormal psychology, the authors state, ‘Perhaps more directly relevant are experiences in which individual infliction of pain on an animal or another person has given rise to sexual excitement. We have noted elsewhere the connection between strong emotional and sexual stimulation.’...

hunting ‘may reflect a profound yet subtle psychosexual inadequacy.’...‘Hunters are seeking reassurance of their sexuality. The feeling of power that hunting brings temporarily relieves this sexual uneasiness.’”... “Killing the Female: The Psychology of the Hunt,”...

Whether or not hunters shoot deer to demonstrate sexual potency or out of sexual frustration, in symbolic lieu of raping and killing women, there can be little doubt that as a social ritual, much hunting is all about killing the feminine in the hunter’s own self....

The deer camp atmosphere of exaggerated masculinity is apparently not unlike the atmosphere of “leather trade” gay bars, albeit that the gay bars more likely try to emulate deer camps than the other way around.... “This hunting habit is anything but an expression of manhood.”... transvestitism... arrested for indecent exposure and resisting arrest. Gregory Hemingway appears to have never been an actual practicing homosexual, just insecure – like his father, who likewise spent his whole life trying to prove masculinity that no one else ever seriously called into question.

“pin it on anybody, that’s how we roll.”

Detective William Broghamer

"It is endless the amount of times per week officers arrest an individual, label him a suspect-arrestee-defendant and then before arraignment or trial realize that he is innocent based on evidence. You know what they say when they realize an innocent man just had his life turned upside down?. “I guess he should have stayed at home that day he was discovered walking down the street and matching the suspects description. Oh well, he appeared to be a dirtbag anyways”. Meanwhile the falsely accused is left to pick up his life, get a new, family, friends, and sense of self worth."

Chris Dorner Manifesto War Vet and Former L.A. Police Officer

SUPER QUEER SOLVES 76% OF ALL HOMOCIDES IN HOMOVILLE EXCEEDING THE NATIONAL RATE OF 21% TO 37%, WHICH IS A DIFFERENCE OF 39% TO 55%. SUPER QUEER SAYS HOMOVILLE HAS NO PRIMARY CAUSE NOR NO COMMON PROFILE AND HOMOVILLE ALSO HAD A 13% RISE IN HOMOCIDES FOR UNKNOWN REASONS.

As murders in the city of Tucson rose last year, TPD's solve rate exceeds national average

https://tucson.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/as-murders-in-the-city-of-tucson-rose-last-year/article_808ac1ea-5ebe-5557-8980-730df4b2da44.html

Murders over the last year in the city of Tucson rose by 13 percent for reasons unknown to local law enforcement, but the Tucson Police Department has managed to solve the vast majority with the community’s help.... The department’s homicide clearance rate of 76 percent is higher than the national average of 61.6 percent, which Tucson Police Chief Chris Magnus attributes to the large number of tips from the community and exceptional work by the department’s detectives. That number will likely be slightly higher, since several investigations are in the early stages.... “Some places have seen big decreases in all sorts of crime. We’re not seeing that at the moment,” Magnus said. “... While some types of homicides can be influenced by police strategies, Tucson’s homicides don’t really fit into those boxes, Magnus said.... Tucson doesn’t have a primary cause of murder, and there’s no common profile of a murder suspect....

Former Fargo, ND Police Chief being sued for homosexual sexual assault on a Police Officer

Former Richmond cop sues Chief Chris Magnus, claiming sexual harassment, firing in retaliation

http://www.mercurynews.com/my-town/ci_27858472/former-richmond-cop-sues-chief-chris-magnus-over

WHEN SOMEONE KILLS YOU THE SLAVE PATROL MAKES AN ARREST IN 33% TO 49% OF HOMICIDES.

OUT OF THOSE ARRESTED AT LEAST 12% ARE INNOCENT.

THAT MEANS PO'LICE CATCH YOUR REAL MURDERER AT MOST 21% TO 37% OF THE TIME.

YOUR LIFE IS BEST SAVED BY YOUR OWN DEFENSE...

Where killings go unsolved

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/investigations/where-murders-go-unsolved

The Washington Post investigative team dug into decades of homicide cases in 50 American cities, and uncovered a startling finding: in dozens of cities murder is common, but arrests are rare. The team looked at 52,000 homicide cases, and found that the overall homicide arrest rate is 49 percent. But in some cities the team identified, “areas of impunity,” in which the police make arrests less than 33 percent of the time. “Some cities, such as Baltimore and Chicago, solve so few homicides that vast areas stretching for miles experience hundreds of homicides with virtually no arrests,” they wrote. Many officials in departments with low arrest rates say frayed relationships with the community make it hard to investigate cases. While residents say the police departments are apathetic to their needs. The investigation, spearheaded by the Wesley Lowery and Kimbriell Kelly, quantifies the cost of police mistrust in neighborhoods racked with violence.

How many killings that are listed by law enforcement as unknown, homicide, suicide, etc. are actual murder by law enforcement on or off duty, or are pinned on the innocent scapegoat or fall guy?

Whether to meet quotas, to advance ones career, recognition, serial killer cop, agendas such as gun control, increased po'lice powers, gain more money from gubmint grants and donations, personal, etc....

https://sites.google.com/site/korruptlaw/police-official-misconduct/police-homicides

https://sites.google.com/site/korruptlaw/usa-1-terrorist

https://sites.google.com/site/korruptlaw/

Women gun owners launch #NotMeSD movement

https://www.10news.com/news/local-news/women-gun-owners-launch-notmesd-movement

The initiative aims to empower women with knowledge and choice. The group believes one way to prevent domestic violence and sexual assault is with guns. ...

ACTIVE SHOOTERS ARE LAW ABIDING GOOD GUYS...

A Half-Century of School Shootings Like Columbine, Sandy Hook and Parkland

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/05/11/us/school-shootings-united-states.html

Active shooters may attack anywhere, but a demographic analysis shows they tend to have traits in common. The majority of shooters were young white men or boys, many of them current or former students of the schools where they opened fire....

PROFILE OF A MASS MURDERER: A NORMAL LAW ABIDING GOOD GUY.

BE ON THE LOOKOUT FOR A LAW ABIDING GOOD GUY THAT LOOKS AND ACTS JUST LIKE TENS OF THOUSANDS OF AMERICANS WHO CAN LEGALLY BUY A GUN, CALL THEMSELVES GOOD GUYS, AND SEE THEMSELVES AS HEROS. HE IS THE PROFILE OF A MASS MURDERER...

Mass Murderers Fit Profile, as Do Many Others Who Don’t Kill

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/04/us/mass-murderers-fit-profile-as-do-many-others-who-dont-kill.html

What seems telling about the killers, however, is not how much they have in common but how much they look and seem like so many others who do not inflict harm.... “The big problem is that the kind of pattern that describes them describes tens of thousands of Americans — even people who write awful things on Facebook or the Internet,” said James Alan Fox, a criminologist at Northeastern University who has studied and written about mass murderers. “We can’t round up all the people who scare us.”...

Grant Duwe, a criminologist with the Minnesota Department of Corrections, has studied more than 1,300 mass murders that took place from 1900 to 2013. Of them, he classifies 160 as mass public shootings... Those who study these types of mass murderers have found that they are almost always male (all but two of the 160 cases isolated by Dr. Duwe). Most are single, separated or divorced. The majority are white. With the exception of student shooters at high schools or lower schools, they are usually older than the typical murderer, often in their 30s or 40s. They vary in ideology. They generally have bought their guns legally. Many had evidence of mental illness, particularly those who carried out random mass killings. But others did not, and most people with mental illness are not violent. “They’re depressed,” Dr. Fox said. “They’re not out of touch with reality. They don’t hear voices. They don’t think the people they’re shooting are gophers.”. They do not fit in. Their most comfortable companion is themselves. According to Dr. Fox, mass killers tend to be “people in social isolation with a lack of support systems to help them through hard times and give them a reality check.” “They have a history of frustration,” he went on. “They externalize blame. Nothing is ever their fault. They blame other people even if other people aren’t to blame. They see themselves as good guys mistreated by others.” ...“They see them as heroes,”...

Dr. Swanson of Duke said studies indicated that only 7 percent of people with a diagnosed mental illnesses might do anything violent in a year, “and that is something as minor as pushing or shoving somebody.”

With many of the killers, the signs are of anger and disappointment and solitude. “Sure, you’ve got these risk factors, but they also describe thousands of people who are never going to commit a mass shooting,” Dr. Swanson said. “You can’t go out and round up all the alienated angry young men.” ...

BEWARE LAW ABIDING GOOD GUY HAS A GUN...

How Gun Violence Is Changing Friday Night Football

https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2019/09/25/how-gun-violence-is-changing-friday-night.html

In the opening weeks of this school year, at least seven shootings that have killed two people, including an 8-year-old girl, have occurred in or near stadiums filled with spectators watching high school football. One shooting—in a stadium in Mobile, Ala., last month—injured 11 people as the game was ending. Social media posts showed players taking cover on the field and attendees shielding themselves under bleachers....

Mass school shootings...But shootings and other violence at school-sponsored events after hours and off campus, are often seen as a different kind of problem...When is a shooting at a high school football game or other school sporting event a school shooting? It’s a complicated call, as there’s no universal definition. When shootings happen at athletic events, school and police officials often characterize them as “community violence” or neighborhood beefs that have spilled over into the school-related event. Education Week tracks school shootings, counting incidents that meet a list of criteria that our team of journalists has carefully developed and revised through thoughtful consideration and vigorous debate. At times, what we count as a school shooting is not how it’s described by local authorities....

WARNING: FRIENDLY PEOPLE MURDER THEIR HOS...

Domestic violence survivor helps women, and herself, rebuild

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/dec/30/domestic-violence-survivor-helps-women-and-herself/

Lynn Reilly moved to South Carolina in 2012, a few months after the state topped the national list of places where women were murdered by their husbands and boyfriends. “It’s kind of a contradiction, isn’t it? That we’re the friendliest city and have the most (domestic violence) murders,” she said. “We’re all polite to strangers, but we take it out on the people we’re closest to.”...

USA SLAVES MUST BE OF GOOD CHARACTER TO GIT A DISASTER LOAN.

LAW ABIDING GOOD GUYS AND SLAVE AUCTIONS WILL BE THE JUDGES OF WHO ARE BAD GUYS AFTER USING TORTURE TO FORCE 95% TO 99% OF ALL THE SLAVES TO PLEAD GUILTY DESPITE INNOCENCE. AFTER THEY ARE ENTERED INTO USA SLAVE DATABASE THEY ARE DISQUALIFIED FROM THEIR CONSTITUTION, AND DISQUALIFIED FROM ALL FREE MUNEE GIVEN TO ONLY LAW ABIDING GOOD GUYS TO PAY BILLS. SINCE BAD GUYS DONT HAB BILLS TO PAY THEY DONT GIT FREE GUBMINT MUNEE....

Applying for an SBA loan with a criminal record

http://ccresourcecenter.org/2020/03/27/applying-for-an-sba-loan-with-a-criminal-record/

Collateral Consequences Resource Center

Collateral Consequences of Criminal Conviction and Restoration of Rights: News, Commentary, and Tools

VIOLENT CRIME = BANNING BILL OF RIGHTS. BY CLASSIFYING CRIMES AS VIOLENT ALLOWS THE DOMESTIC ENEMIES TO "LEGALLY" USURP THE CONSTITUTION BECUZ THEY MAKE THE LAWS THAT ALLOW THEM TO DO SO.

ANYTIME YOUR WIFE OR GIRLFRIEND FALSELY ACCUSES YOU OF ANYTHING IS A VIOLENT CRIME. A SIMPLE NONPHYSICAL ARGUEMENT IS A VIOLENT CRIME. ANYTIME SLAVE PATROL HYPES UP THEIR MANUFACTURED FALSE REPORTS ARE A VIOLENT CRIME. WHENEVER SLAVE AUCTION OVERCRIMINALIZES CRIMES YOU DID NOT DO BUT, YOU ARE FORCED TO PLEAD GUILTY TO THEM IS A VIOLENT CRIME. MANY MORE EXAMPLES MAKES NON- CRIMES AND FRIVALOUS CRIMES A VIOLENT CRIME...

Many “Violent Offenders” Have Committed Nonviolent Crimes

https://www.themarshallproject.org/2019/04/03/when-violent-offenders-commit-nonviolent-crimes

MANY "CRIMINALS" HAVE NOT COMMITED THE CRIME THEY ARE CHARGED WITH. MANY CASES NO CRIME EVER OCCURRED. MANY CASES THE WRONGFULLY CONVCITED IS THE ACTUAL VICITM. MANY CONVICTED FOR "VIOLENT CRIMES" NO VIOLENCE EVER OCCURRED...

Cleveland Courts Are Full of “Career Criminals.” They Aren’t Who You Think.

https://www.themarshallproject.org/2022/10/26/who-s-really-cycling-in-and-out-of-cleveland-s-courts

“A vast number of people who we sweep into the criminal system are not actually ‘criminal’ in any meaningful sense,” said Alexandra Natapoff, a Harvard law professor and former federal public defender who has extensively studied low-level criminal offenses. “They are not scary, they are not dangerous. They do things we don’t want them to do, but the American habit of labeling people criminals and then throwing them under the societal bus is very particular and very American.” ...

Is Burglary a Violent Crime? An Empirical Investigation of the Armed Career Criminal Act’s Classification of Burglary as a Violent Felony

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0887403416684594?journalCode=cjpa&%20https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/323/=&

Results showed that burglary is overwhelmingly a non-violent offense. The national incidence of actual violence or threats of violence during a burglary was 7.9%. At most, 2.7% of burglaries involved actual acts of violence....

Even the justices don’t know what a “crime of violence is.”

ARE SLAVES GUILTY OF A VIOLENT CRIME IF HE NEVER USED ANY VIOLENCE?

IF MASTA SAYS SHE IS IN FEAR IS SLAVE GUILTY OF A CRIME OF VIOLENCE FOR HOW MASTA SAYS SHE FEELS? AND WHY IS SLAVE TAUGHT HE MUST CONTROL HIMSELF BUT, SLAVE IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR HOW MASTA FEELS WHOM SHE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR HER THOUGHTS REGARDLESS HOW FALSE SHE SAYS SHE FEELS...

Justices get imaginative in dispute over attempted robbery and “crimes of violence” - SCOTUSblog

https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/12/justices-get-imaginative-in-dispute-over-attempted-robbery-and-crimes-of-violence/

Mind-reading police officers, guns made of marshmallows, and a Woody Allen mockumentary all made rhetorical appearances during Tuesday’s argument in United States v. Taylor, a case about how to define a violent crime.... ” The statute, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), defines “crime of violence” as any felony that involves “the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force.”... attempted robbery does not necessarily involve “the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force.”...

the meaning of the statute should not depend on “legal imagination.” Hypothetical examples involving unrealized “attempts” to commit robbery through unexpressed threats, she said, are far-fetched or could never be prosecuted under the Hobbs Act in the first place... “We don’t need to pretend that we live in the movie Minority Report in which the government can prosecute pre-crime and thought crime and benign, private, preparatory steps,” Taibleson said. “That’s not how Congress writes laws, and that’s not how we interpret them.”. In practice, Taibleson continued, the government can prosecute attempted robbery under the Hobbs Act only if the defendant actually reached the point of threatening the use of force (or used it directly). That practical reality, she said, means that any attempted robbery under the Hobbs Act meets the definition of “crime of violence” under Section 924(c)....

“Is it a violation of the Hobbs Act if a person attempts to threaten but does not actually threaten?”...

On the Language of Nonviolence and the US Criminal Justice System

https://lithub.com/on-the-language-of-nonviolence-and-the-us-criminal-justice-system/

It’s estimated that anywhere from 5 to 25 percent of sexual assaults are never reported, and only about one-fifth of those reported lead to an arrest. All told, less than 1 percent of sexual assaults lead to a criminal conviction. Forty percent of murders are never solved. If you commit a so-called violent crime in America, you’re far more than likely to get away with it. As Derecka Purnell put it in a recent article for The Atlantic, the reply to the question “What will we do with murderers and rapists?” is simple: Which ones?

People in prison for violent convictions have often caused profound harm, but these individuals aren’t the most violent or the only violent people among us. They’re just among the relatively few who got caught—and that, more than anything, is what separates them from the rest of us.

The distinction between violent and nonviolent is, moreover, a false binary. It is, as the civil rights lawyer Alec Karakatsanis points out, a rhetorical device designed to highlight certain forms of harm in the public consciousness while downplaying others. Countless forms of structural violence go unnamed, financial crimes that ruin millions of lives are given the genteel label “white collar,” and environmental violence on a global and intergenerational scale is largely ignored by the carceral state. Meanwhile, a person struggling with untreated mental illness who grabs a stranger’s arm has committed assault and is now officially categorized as a violent criminal....

NIGGERS AND SPICS COMMIT MOST MURDERS...

Murders Rose Last Year. Black and Hispanic Neighborhoods Were Hit Hardest.

https://www.themarshallproject.org/2021/04/08/murders-rose-last-year-black-and-hispanic-neighborhoods-were-hit-hardest

Gardner and Magali’s murders last year were two of four in a census tract just shy of a half-square mile, where Black and Hispanic residents make up over 95% of the population. In 2019, the same area saw only a single murder. Despite a statewide stay-at-home order, Los Angeles recorded 332 killings in 2020, a precipitous jump — 95 more lives lost to murder than the year before, according to the city’s crime data. Almost all of the increase in homicides took place in Los Angeles’ Black or Hispanic neighborhoods.

Across the country, other cities followed a similar pattern last year: a spike in murders, concentrated in Black and Hispanic neighborhoods, according to a Marshall Project analysis. Black and Hispanic Neighborhoods Saw Highest Murder Increase

From 2019 to 2020, homicides in nine U.S. cities rose by 722, according to police data. More than 85% of the increase took place in predominantly Black and Hispanic neighborhoods, where homicide rates were already higher than White and Asian neighborhoods....

ALL LAW ABIDING GOOD GUYS ARE IMMUNE FROM OBEYING THE LAWS.

THE CONSTITUTION ONLY PROTECTS LAW ABIDING GOOD GUYS FROM TYRANNICAL GUBMINT.

LAWS ARE MADE ONLY FOR SLAVES TO OBEY.

DEFENSE OF, AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION IS ONLY FOR LAW ABIDING GOOD GUYS.

EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW IS ONLY FOR LAW ABIDING GOOD GUYS.

AFTER BANNING ALL NIGGERS, SLAVES, AND OTHER BAD GUYS FROM THE USA BILL OF RIGHTS THE STATE MASTAS WILL BAN THE FEDERAL MASTAS FROM BANNING THE STATE MASTAS BECUZ SHALL NOT INFRINGE ONLY REFERS TO LAW ABIDING GOOD GUYS...

Why G.O.P.-Led States Are Banning the Police From Enforcing Federal Gun Laws

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/18/us/missouri-federal-gun-laws.html

A bill signed by Gov. Mike Parson over the weekend — at a gun store called Frontier Justice — threatens a penalty of $50,000 against any local police agency that enforces certain federal gun laws and regulations that constitute “infringements” of Second Amendment gun rights. At least eight other states — Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia — have taken similar action this year, passing laws of varying strength that discourage or prohibit the enforcement of federal gun statutes by state and local agents and officers. The new law “is about protecting law-abiding Missourians against government overreach and unconstitutional federal mandates,” Mr. Parson and the attorney general, Eric Schmitt, said in a letter defending the law on Thursday to the U.S. Justice Department. They said the state would “reject any attempt by the federal government to circumvent the fundamental right Missourians have to keep and bear arms to protect themselves and their property.”...

LAW ABIDING GOOD GUY SLAVE PATROL MURDERS SLAVES THEN CHANGES CORONER REPORT OF HOMICIDE TO ACCIDENT BECUZ HE IS ALSO THE CORONER...

Editorial: Sheriffs shouldn't be coroners too. Split the job.

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2022-04-14/coroner-sheriff-split

Consider, for example, San Joaquin County, where in 2017, two forensic pathologists resigned their positions after saying Sheriff Steve Moore — who was also the coroner — interfered with their work. Doctors and technicians in the department said Moore ordered the cause of death to be changed from “homicide” to “accident” in three cases in which law enforcement was involved in the deaths. The Board of Supervisors wisely responded by stripping coroner duties from the sheriff and creating a separate, appointed chief medical examiner’s office....

AS THE NIGGERS, SLAVES, AND OTHER BAD GUYS ARE BANNED FRUM THE BILL OF PRIVILEGES MORE AND MORE LAW ABIDING GOOD GUYS ARE PACKING...

More kids report carrying handguns, with largest rise among white, wealthy, and rural teens, new study finds

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/04/26/metro/more-kids-report-carrying-handguns-with-largest-rise-among-white-wealthy-rural-teens-new-study-finds

number of teenagers nationwide who acknowledge carrying a handgun has jumped significantly...number of young people, ages 12 to 17, who reported they’d carried a handgun in the prior year increased by 41 percent from 2002 to 2019.... the sharpest rise among white teens and those in families with the highest annual incomes (those making $75,000 or more). They also found a significant increase among youngsters in rural areas. “White and higher income youth are now the most likely of the groups to report handgun carriage, and that’s quite different from the pattern 15 to 20 years ago,”...

WHO STOPS THE LAW ABIDING GOOD GUYS WITH A GUN. GOOD GUYS COMMIT OVER 3 OUT OF EVERY 4 MURDERS....

Who Stops a ‘Bad Guy With a Gun’?

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/06/22/us/shootings-police-response-uvalde-buffalo.html

“What stops armed bad guys is armed good guys,” Senator Ted Cruz suggested ...

data from two decades of such attacks reveals patterns in how they unfold, and how hard they are to stop once they have begun. There were at least 433 active shooter attacks — in which one or more shooters killed or attempted to kill multiple unrelated people in a populated place — in the United States from 2000 to 2021...

433 ATTACKS/22 YEARS= 20/YR AVG IN THE USA.

“It’s direct, indisputable, empirical evidence that this kind of common claim that ‘the only thing that stops a bad guy with the gun is a good guy with the gun’ is wrong,”...

about half of all cases, the attackers commited suicide or simply stopped shooting and fled....

Police officers shoot or physically subdue the shooter in less than a third of attacks....

People at the scene did intervene, sometimes shooting the attackers, but typically physically subduing them....

DOUBLE MASTA HO AND GUBMINT PIMP TRIED TO MURDER A SLAVE USING HER MOTOR VEHICLE, AND SHE JUST KEEPS ON GOING....

Video released of Jersey City councilwoman hit-and-run

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdolLOQplz0

The Jersey City mayor’s office released video footage from a hit-and-run accident involving a Jersey City councilwoman. In the video, cyclist Andrew Black appears to run through a red light. Councilwoman Amy DeGise’s black SUV collides with him in the intersection, tossing him over the bike and into the street.

LAW ABIDING GOOD GUYS WITH GUNS, AND BAD GUYS BANNED FROM GUNS HAS INCREASED HOMICIDE RATES....

2020 Was the Deadliest Year for North Dakota in the Last Decade

https://www.newstopicnews.com/2020-was-the-deadliest-year-for-north-dakota-in-the-last-decade/article_740bad16-911d-55cb-9c1b-b44a5b78d78a.html

homicide cases jumped by nearly 30%, the largest single-year increase on record.

With 21,570 murders reported in the United States in 2020, the most recent year of available data, the national homicide rate stands 6.5 incidents for every 100,000 people - the highest it has been in over a decade.

2020 was also the deadliest year in North Dakota in the last decade, based on FBI homicide rate data from 2011 through 2020. There were 32 homicides reported in the state in 2020, or 4.2 for every 100,000 people.

AS MORE LAW ABIDING GOOD GUYS BUY MORE GUNS, AND BAN MORE BAD GUYS THE HOMICIDES INCREASE. NORTH DAKOTA #19 MOST GUN SALES PER CAPITA...

South Dakota Reports Higher Gun Sales per Capita Than Most States This Year

https://www.thecentersquare.com/south_dakota/south-dakota-reports-higher-gun-sales-per-capita-than-most-states-this-year/article_fbc62d43-7d92-5bf6-86ad-3b249b162114.html

Est. gun sales per 1,000 people; Jan-July 2022:

#19 North Dakota 54.4 #18 South Dakota 54.6