From merope@Radix.Net Wed Apr 28 19:47:05 1999
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 19:47:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: merope <merope@Radix.Net>
Reply-To: merope <merope@Radix.Net>
To: usgw_all@listbot.com
Subject: Daily Board Show
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.96.990428190101.25929B-100000@saltmine.radix.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: O
X-Status:
Squeezed fresh every day...its your Daily Board Show!
*warning* contains editorial content. Read at your own risk.
Monday 26 April 1999:
The NC welcomes the Board members back to work with the following message:
"I hope all of you had some time to relax and get lots of data on line in
the time we've been off. While in some ways it was a restful week, it was
also a week of tragedies. The Salt Lake incident, the shootings at
Columbine High School and the death of one of our SCs all happening within
the last ten days was a lot of input upon one's well being. Memorials to
each are now on our 'front door' and we are getting several nice comments
about our statements there."
A board members moves to appoint Pam Reid as the new webmaster for the
national web page. The motion is seconded. The NC gives it motion number
99-10 and indicates the "upcoming votes" paeg at the national website has
been changed to indicate that Motion 99-10 is open for discussion.
One Board member enthusiastically supports Pam's nomination: "Pam is an
accomplished graphic artist and web page designer. She has also
demonstrated, in her past positions, the self discipline necessary to
accomplish her work promptly and professionally, all qualities needed for
the job of presenting the best face on our project, our front door. I
would hope that we could all unanimously support Pam for our National
Project Webmaster."
But wait! There is is dissension in the ranks! Another Board member
posts that "I'd like to call a point of order. The motion numbered 99-10,
I believe to be out of order and illegal in that Kay Mason, may be being
ignored at the moment, but is the present member of the WebMaster team and
as such has something to say in the matter before any nomination can be
made. In other words, we have a webmaster who has been denied access to
the position and being usurped."
To which a colleague responds: "I fail to see how Kay is being denied
anything. She was assistant to the previous webmaster and would have
served in the event the webmaster was incapaciated. Because the webmaster
resigned, the board has every right to nominate whomever it chooses,
including Kay, and have them stand for election." This position is
supported by another Board member who state, "As the Assistant SC of
FLGenWeb, I am not preordained to take the helm if the FLGenWeb SC
resigns. An assistant is just that, an assistant. We can nominate the
Assistant, but there is nothing saying we can't nominate someone else."
Pam, putative candidate for the webmaster position, posts her
recollections of how the previous webmaster was selected: "When the Board
was first formed (and I am referring here to the first non elected Board),
it became apparent pretty quickly that we needed to find someone new to do
the USGenWeb national pages. There were problems with Sir James (and I am
sure Megan will back me up on that). So, a committee was appointed from
the Board members to design a new national site." Celia and Kay were both
on this committee and Celia became the webmaster. She stayed on as
webmaster after the elected Board was seated, following a vote by that
body to retain her. Kay was made assistant to perform the webmaster
functions in the event Celia was unable to. Pam points out, "I do not
recall any discussion at that time about the assistant taking over should
Celia resign." Pam also points out that she is not doing this to further
her own nomination, but as one who has "served on the Board since its
inception and have been a party to most of the decisions, votes,
processes, etc."
Kay, putative contender for the position of webmaster, responds that she
wasn't a member of the first webpage committee as it was formed before she
joined the Board. She directs Pam's attention to "the post that Bonnie
McVicker-Briggs made to Board-Exec on the 18th. for information on the
asst. webmaster job."
Yet another Board Member asks, "While I remember very distinctly of Kay
being appointed assistant webmaster to carry on in the event that Celia
was no longer able, I can't find it in the votes or in my files. Can
someone provide me with the action that made Kay the assistant webmaster?"
She thinks both would be excellent webmasters, but feels she needs to how
Kay came to be appointed as assistant.
Another Board members posts minutes from the IRC Board meeting held in
October in which Nancy Trice, former NC, appointed Kay to the committee
and noted "The bylaws call for a webpage committee. Kay will make the 2nd
person on the committee as the board rep to the committee and will step in
in case you are incapacitated or unavailable." As the Board member points
out, "there is no mention of an Assistant Webmaster."
A Board member moves that "the motion to appoint Pam as webmaster be
amended to include Kay Mason, and that an election be held."
In response to this, a Board member posts a request for clarification of
wording of the proposes amendment, "I presume you mean "include Kay as
assistant" or "include Kay as committee", but as written could mean "to
include Kay as webmaster" or even to include Kay as a part of Pam, which
likely won't set well with either person's family.<G>"
Tomorrow's News Today: The amendment for Motion 99-10 is seconded; more
talk about the webmaster position.
Update Corner: Although the Board was away over the weekend, there was
some traffic on Board-L. Here's a brief recap:
On Friday 23 April, two messages were posted expressing sorrow over the
recent demise of State Coordinator and former Board Member Don Spidell.
On Sunday 25 April, the NC posts a message of condolences, presumably to
Mr. Spidell's family, signed by all the Board members.
This has been your Daily Board Show.
-Teresa Linduist
merope@radix.net
--------------
Daily Board Show, (c) 1999 by Teresa Lindquist, all rights reserved.
From merope@Radix.Net Thu Apr 29 20:12:10 1999
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 20:12:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: merope <merope@Radix.Net>
Reply-To: merope <merope@Radix.Net>
To: usgw_all@listbot.com
Subject: Daily Board Show
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.96.990429192632.21109B-100000@saltmine.radix.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: O
X-Status:
Pretty fly for a white guy...its Your Daily Board Show!
*warning* contains editorial content. This means you. Read at your own
risk!
Tuesday 27 April 1999:
The amendment to Motion 99-10 (to include Kay as webmaster) is seconded.
The amendment is reworded for clarity and now reads: "I move that motion
99-10: Be amended to say: In as much as both Kay Mason and Pam Reid have
expressed the desire to be the webmaster of the USGenWeb Project's
national pages, that an election be held to choose a webmaster."
The revised amended Motion 99-10 is seconded.
The NC posts a message pointing out that "when the Secretary position was
filled I found that a Motion was made to 'create' the position of
Secretary and that after that motion (99-x) passed that nominations were
accepted for the position." He wonders if the Board might want to do
things the same way for the webmaster position. He believes that "folks
would have to vote whether or not to include Kay in the Motion for
appointing Pam as Webmaster first, since it is an amendment before voting
on the main motion which in effect would make such voting a
mini-election." He asks the board their opinions on this.
Desperate Times Corner: Things must be getting tight over at Rootsweb.
Not only are they snuggling up to Genealogy.com [a front for The Learning
Company, owner of Family Treemaker] and selling their users for two bucks
a head to FamilyPoint [which harvests user information for advertisers],
now their loyal supporters are apparently spamming non-Rootsweb mailing
lists trying to drum up dollars. Following yesterday's publication of the
RW Review this message has showed up under different authorship on two
unrelated mailing lists to which this author subscribes [and one of them
is not genealogy related]: "Off topic for a minute: Anyone who uses/has
used/has gained info, etc from Rootsweb, please take a look at their
member page. I just got a notice that only 7% of users have contributed
anything. Somehow doesn't seem fair for a service so vital to the
genealogical community. Every little bit helps." [Can you imagine what
would happen if a user posted a message like this about a non-Rootsweb
company to a Rootsweb mailing list?]
Also according to the RW Review this week, RW is expanding into new
realms: "Another thing that RootsWeb is doing is launching new hobby
communities, the first of which will be for pet owners, then cooking and
home crafts, gardening and home improvement, and travel. We hope that
spreading the cost of developing software and operating servers across
several communities will enable us to provide many new facilities for
genealogists." Its been awhile since we've heard talk of these new
"communities", but back in July 1998, in a message to TEAM-ROOTSWEB, Brian
said, "It's no secret that RootsWeb will probably start up new
pets-oriented and home-arts-oriented Web and list sites within the next
few months." In another message on the same topic he states, "There's
probably no help for it, but in point of fact ... The other sites will
subsidize the genealogical community...If we do other communities, we
will be probably be structuring them such that they run in the black.
That will be good for the genealogical community." [Hope the cat lovers
and backyard gardeners know their user fees are going to subsidize
genealogy. On a personal note, I can hardly wait for Brian to start
banning users for not sufficiently supporting heirloom tomatoes or exotic
cat breeds.]
These must be desperate times indeed.
"All bad precedents began as justifiable measures."
---Gaius Julius Caesar
This has been your Daily Board Show.
-Teresa Lindquist
merope@radix.net
------
Daily Board Show, (c) 1999 by Teresa Lindquist, all rights reserved
From merope@Radix.Net Fri Apr 30 18:33:53 1999
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 18:33:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: merope <merope@Radix.Net>
To: usgw_all@listbot.com
Subject: Daily Board Show
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.96.990430182745.7257A-100000@saltmine.radix.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: O
X-Status:
Goin' for broke...its Your Daily Board Show!
*warning* contains editorial content. Read at your own risk!
Wednesday 28 April 1999:
There is no Board-L traffic on this date.
Tomorrow's News Today: The NC throws open the floor for discussion of the
amended [second version] Motion 99-10 [for webmaster]
"... The dominant purpose of the First Amendment was to prohibit the
widespread practice of government suppression of embarrassing
information...."
--Justice William O. Douglas, New York Times v. Unites States
(Pentagon Papers)
This has been your Daily Board Show.
-Teresa Lindquist
merope@radix.net
-----------
Daily Board Show, (c) 1999 by Teresa Lindquist, all rights reserved.