Measure 110-outrageous & stupid

If ever the road to Hell was paved with good intentions, measure 110 is a classic example of that timeless dynamic. Measure 110, as written by Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum, was passed by the Oregon Legislature in an effort to mitigate what many consider to be the failed "war on drugs" and what the consequences of that failed war represent. Treatment not jail was the rallying cry for this measure. 

It should be mentioned that Ellen Rosenblum has come under criticism for the hypocrisy of her own life. She is the wife of Richard Meeker, who is one of the owners of Willamette Week Newspaper, and for many years did business with the reprehensible website called Back Page Dot Com, which was closed down for rampant sexual trafficking.  The woman who had vowed to take on the predatory men who are the core of Oregon sex traffickers is married to man who accepted money and did business with Back Page Dot Com, which was famously closed down due to promoting sex trafficking. 

While there is a great deal of merit in that ideology, measure 110 has taken a grim U-turn backwards and is careening toward disaster. Our teen-age children and young children are directly in the line of fire and susceptible to being impacted for life if they are not protected against the growing casual acceptance of serious drug use and drug addiction. Not everyone is for this new law and former Governor John Kitzhaber is one of those opposed to it. 

Ellen Rosenblum, a lawyer by trade, is apparently trying to practice medicine without a license. The author of this seriously misguided law must have never had any personal experience with the list of drugs she proposed to decriminalize. Or perhaps she has and she just doesn’t think it’s that big a deal? But even the highly respected former Governor John Kitzhaber does not support this new law, explaining in a blog post that: “Incarcerating people who suffer from addiction should not be tolerated. But today, very few people are jailed simply for possession—and eliminating our current drug diversion program, before building the capacity to address Oregon’s addiction crisis, will have lethal consequences.”

Rosenblum is playing doctor—a dangerous kind of Russian roulette with our kids lives. This law states that any adult or juvenile may possess small amounts of the drugs on the approved list. And this is a large list of dangerous substances that are known to be extremely addictive. 

Another Oregon doctor who takes aim at this horrible law is Dr. Paul Coelho, who writes in a published statement entitled: “PHYSICIANS TAKE AN OATH TO DO NO HARM; MEASURE 110 CREATES HARM that he does not agree with the new measure. “I’m a physician with a hospital-based practice focused on treating patients with chronic pain and addiction. During my 25-year career, I’ve observed firsthand the adverse health and societal effects of illicit drug use in our community including: overdoses, HIV and Hepatitis C infections, heart valve infections, epidural abscesses, skin-grafts due to injection drug use, homelessness, domestic violence, suicide, psychiatric holds, work-loss, divorce, loss of child custody, and social isolation. Despite clear harms of continued use, most addicted individuals will refuse treatment when it’s offered. In fact, recent epidemiological data reveals treatment refusal rates for both opioid and methamphetamine addictions exceed 80%. Consequently, those experiencing addiction often require external incentives/disincentives such like threat of loss of family and friends; drug courts; and collaboration between law enforcement, courts, probation, DHS, and the treatment community to collaboratively nudge addicted individuals into long-term recovery."

Dr. Coelho goes onto explain the state of mind of most addicts, which I completely agree with when he writes: “Measure 110 framers portray individuals with active addictions as rational actors who will naturally seek out and accept treatment for their condition. I can assure you as a front-line provider it’s simply not true. Nor will levying a token $100.00 fine be financial disincentive of sufficient magnitude to coax ambivalent or pre-contemplative people into a life of abstinence or long-term recovery. Unfortunately, removing the threat of incarceration and abandoning collaboration between law enforcement, probation, and the drug court system will result in a revolving door of drug abuse, treatment refusal, crime, homelessness, and ongoing costly health-related expenditures for hospitalizations due to overdoses, infections, and drug-induced psychosis. We need look no further than recent problems surrounding the Portland sobering center or staggering financial losses at the Unity Center to appreciate the magnitude of the illicit drug crisis we face in Oregon. As a healthcare provider I urge you to join me and vote no on Ballot Measure 110. Oregon can do better.”

It is legal for your child to possess forty hits of (LSD) acid! In my younger days I used acid occasionally and have personal experience with the drug. It is a temporary form (hopefully) of a twelve hour experience into the terrifying landscape of chemical insanity, delusions, and nightmarish hallucinations. I can say this with confidence and also that it has destroyed more than a few lives in the process, altering the brain chemistry in a way that is irrevocable and permanent. 

Each acid trip is a gamble you take hoping that you can return to any semblance of normalcy. I survived but many did not. My wife, Theresa, has a sister who used LSD numerous times one summer in the late 1970s. My wife told me this sister has never, ever been the same since. This was years ago and she is now a woman who has been diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic, who lives on social security disability insurance. This sister has been chemically changed, by all appearances, forever. To support any idea or belief that your child can possess or use forty hits of acid is criminal stupidity at its most worst. Forty hits of acid can destroy a young mind permanently. My wife and I have seen it happen.

Another drug on the list is of course, Heroin. Your child may possess one gram of heroin, under this new law. As a lifelong police officer, on the job for nearly twenty years, I have known many heroin addicts in my time, dealers, prostitutes who became addicted, many of them teenaged prostitutes, housewives who became addicted, and housewives who turned into prostitutes after they became addicted.

It always starts with just “a little taste” so the dealer can convince the naïve non-user what it feels like. They know what they’re doing each time they do this. And many of them derive a perverse and sick thrill from watching an innocent young life become addicted to the juice. It is the way all pimps trap young girls into prostitution, and it is the way all pimps trap young men into become dealers or prostates as well. The people who peddle in drugs are not always weak victims but rather socially aware predators. 

Right now, you only have to drive through the streets of downtown Portland to see heroin addicts shooting up or nodding off on every corner. This is the end result of their first “little taste.” If you are a parent, is this really what you want for your daughter, or your son? Do you really want them to get just “a little taste” of this highly addictive schedule one drug? Courtesy of Ellen Rosenblum, attorney turned doctor? Do you think your child will react differently than the millions of other young children and teens who do become addicted and completely destroy their lives in the process? Do you really want to get to know exactly how calculating most drug dealers are? 

Next on the list of drugs your children may possess is two grams of cocaine. Cocaine achieved popular culture approval in the 1970's and was tacitly approved of in popular culture, and used by millions of Americans. Cocaine was touted as a good way to get any party started, releasing inhibitions and making everything seem fun and funny.

Coke, as it is known, is a stimulant, a highly addictive substance with street names like Snow, Crack or Blow. It is listed as a “schedule two controlled substance” by the federal government, available by prescription only. Therefore to get it, you must have doctor’s prescription and only a doctor’s prescription. 

The permissive new measure 110 drug laws must not stand!

Cocaine has destroyed the lives and careers of millions of people. This includes, doctors and lawyers, nurses and accountants, psychologists and writers. It destroyed the life of a well-known Portland attorney sending him to Oregon state prison for several years. Two Portland police officers I know became addicted and it cost them their police careers. They both worked in Vice and their addiction was an accepted part of the job, and certainly not fair to either one of them. And it destroys the lives of those who peddled the drugs as well. As a powder, cocaine is easily snorted up through the nose and the effect is immediate, once it hits the bloodstream. It can make the user sensitive to touch, sound and sight with feelings of happiness initially or feelings of serious paranoia after prolonged use and abuse. Continued use of cocaine can cause headaches, seizures, heart attacks and stroke, due to the way that cocaine enlarges the heart and contributes to heart disease. It is one of those “the-more-you-use-it-the-more-you-need-it” kinds of drugs. Tired of the intense high of cocaine and wanting to “come down” users will resort to alcohol and often valium, if they can get it, to return to normal. In my mind I can hear a conversation between two school children, going something like this:

"Hey, I've got some cocaine. Meet me at the swings on the playground at recess."

"Do ya have a straw to snort it with?”

"Nah, I saved a dollar bill from my lunch money. We can roll it up and snort it that way—ya know, like how they do it in the movies.”

“Yeah! That sounds cool. Let’s do it!”

Is this what Oregon mothers and fathers really want for their children? Is this level of casual acceptance of drug use okay with the ladies of the PTA or the school board members? I doubt if any of the voters who voted for Measure 110, actually took the time to read the fine print before the measure became an Oregon law. All that the voters probably remember, upon learning about this measure was that the “drug war” was a failure. And Measure 110 provided an alternative, so they voted for “medical treatment” for addicts instead of prison terms for repeat offenders and the hardcore drug dealers who have no intention of ever stopping.

To use a cliché, "the devil is in the details."

Methadone is on the list with an allowable amount of, again forty units. Methadone is form of synthetic heroin and is used in drug treatment centers to help drug addicts. The idea is to switch heroin users away from the illegal street drug and then support them on legal Methadone so addicts don't have to steal to support their habit. I have a lot of personal experience with Methadone as I had a romantic partner, a woman named Ramona, who I cared for and supported for over ten years, and she was on the methadone program during most of that time as a state sponsored addict.

Several years ago in Portland there were more documented overdose deaths as a result of Methadone, than the illegal street drug, Heroin. That should help the reader understand that the Methadone program has also been an abysmal failure, as detoxing from the addictive substance is not the goal, but rather maintaining drug addicts until they die, generally decades before they should die of old age or natural causes.

Forty units of Methadone would probably stop the heart of a 15-year-old teenager.

Never mind the fact that Methadone is available by “prescription only” to those enrolled in a Methadone treatment program. Because of this, the only Methadone available to juveniles would be black-market Methadone, usually available on weekends only, when cash-hungry Methadone patients illegally sell one of their weekend take-home doses on the streets.

How does this new law allow a “prescription-only” drug to then be legally used by minor children?

Attorney General Rosenblum is prescribing a drug that has been proven by medical science to be terribly addictive, and Rosenblum has done with without a medical license to practice medicine or prescribe drugs. Who gives her this authority? Does she not realize how she is condemning thousands of potential minor victims of overdose and death? Is she willing to accept responsibility for her role in this state sponsored Genocide of young people? Will the parents or families of these minor children be in a legal position to SUE Rosenblum if their child dies as a result of Measure 110? Perhaps Rosenblum should think about these potentialities, or perhaps she just doesn’t care.

Oxycodone is on this list of drugs which are considered legal and safe for your children to use. 40 Oxycodone pills are allowed in the possession of a minor. Were you aware of any of these details when this measure was touted as a solution for massive drug addiction? 

Oxycodone, along with Methadone is another attempt by massive Big Pharma to reproduce a heroin-like substance for public consumption, and they have been wildly successful, haven’t they? Oxycodone is also a “schedule two” drug. This means that that Oxycodone is available only by prescription. I will ask again why and how a lawyer, now the attorney general of Oregon able to allow a drug available only by prescription to be used by the public, including minor children? The fact that Oxycodone tablets or “Oxy’s” as they are called on the street, are on this list, written by a lawyer, who seems to be practicing medicine without a license, seems to be ludicrous and goes against any understanding of how addiction truly impacts people. How is this even possible? In my opinion, this Measure 110, as written by Ellen Rosenblum, is blatantly and criminally negligent, with no regard for how this impractical law will impact the general public. From my experience as a police officer and a homeless shelter supervisor, when I worked at The Clark Center, from 2000-2006, I can tell you with confidence that many, if not most heroin addicts first started with Oxycodone and then went directly to using Heroin purchased on the streets, illegally.

Is this what parents of teenagers genuinely want? Do they want their children to be offered Heroin or other dangerous and addictive substances by their classmate? Or some kid they meet while waiting for the school bus?

Is it okay for teenagers to begin their drug using career by snorting or swallowing Oxycodone tablets, and then when addicted graduate to full-blown street Heroin? Well, apparently this IS okay for Ellen Rosenblum, a woman with issues of credibility herself, that I’m sure she wishes would just go away.

I do not believe the ladies at the PTA at your local grammar school ever read the fine print of this law when they voted for what seemed like a feel-good measure. I don't think any adult actually realized that they were voting for a nightmare to come. Has decriminalization worked for San Francisco or Seattle? The evidence suggests, resoundingly, that it has NOT worked.

Methamphetamine is next on the list for Rosenblum who would have you believe that it is also okay for juveniles to use—meaning your son or daughter.

Methamphetamine or “Meth” as it is commonly called is also a controlled substance. It is another “schedule two” drug available by prescription only. But is Meth ever prescribed by doctors? It can be, but the reality is, it is rarely ever prescribed by doctors. The reason being that methamphetamine is highly addictive and can transform the biochemistry and the physical formation of the human brain in a way that is permanent, resulting in stroke and later serious disabilities both physical and physiological.

Meth produces an increased sense of energy and alertness, and an elevated mood. It kills the appetite and can produce psychosis, seizures, violence and bleeding of the brain. Its street names are ice, crystal and blue. Users can snort, smoke or dissolve meth in water and shoot it directly into the vein. And it can be lethal in a variety of ways. 

My own son Lee, fell victim to Methamphetamine as a man in his early thirties, with no previous history or use of the drug. He became, after two years of abusing meth, violent in his behavior, paranoid, jealous and preoccupied, to the point that he made some bad decisions, with the aid of his girlfriend at the time. This resulted in the death of his infant daughter Royale. She was four-months-old when she died from neglect, dehydration and undiagnosed pneumonia.

Lee is in prison in Walla Walla State Prison, and my granddaughter is in her grave at Riverside cemetery. Those of us who are left behind are also forced to deal with the aftermath. This includes sending money to support those in prison for long sentences, when you often don’t have it. I will be 85 in a few months and I am still financially supporting my son who is pushing forty. Who will financially support my son when I am gone? These are the things you think about when your son is serving longer than ten years in a state prison.

This drug will cut a wide swath of destruction for the user and all those around people around them. Meth is possibly the most addictive of these drugs and even one use can lead to addiction, loss of sanity, and violent, impulsive criminal behavior.

Many deaths in the homeless population are attributed to the use of Methamphetamine because Meth destroys the white matter of the frontal lobe of the brain—the center that controls our moral and ethical awareness. How many parents want their child to be in line just waiting to see what this one is all about? How many parents want their children to get Meth from their classmate because it has now been decriminalized? And once these children do experience the short thrill-ride of Meth, how many may not be able to leave it alone?

I can tell you that most, who try it, will not be able to just leave it alone, cold turkey.

MDMA is the last poison on this list of addictive state sponsored poisons. Methylenedioxy-methamphetimine is the chemical name of MDMA. Anything with a name quite this long can't be good for anyone, and so the powers that be have shortened it and call it something more pronounceable.

The street names of MDMA are Ecstasy and Molly. In 1985 the FDA listed MDMA as a schedule one drug with “no legitimate medical use.” This illegal drug, usually manufactured in Mexico is often cut with another street drug “bath salts” that is documented to have catastrophic effects upon its users, including severe hallucinations, and violent self-harm.

Attorney General Rosenblum says five pills of MDMA is okay for your children to access. Highly addicting, MDMA will cause muscle cramps, nausea, blurred vision, uncontrolled teeth clenching, impulsive aggression, chills and sweating, causes flu like symptoms. It can affect the body’s ability to regulate its temperature and can lead to kidney and heart failure. Again, is this what Oregon parents want for their children?

Are there things inherently wrong with how this measure was written? Yes! And particularly when you consider that Ellen Rosenblum took on the Purdue drug company, in a 2019 lawsuit which claims that the company "...distributed publications and partnered with industry-funded advocacy organizations in Oregon with untrue and misleading claims, trained its sales force to minimize the harms of OxyContin, and targeted senior citizens and people with disabilities" which resulted in countless Oregonians becoming drug addicts. 

Now to answer the question that I know may be tormenting your mind: Can one person have all the drugs on this list at the same time? 

There is nothing in the text of measure 110 which says NO to this question. I have read the measure, as written by the eponymous Ellen Rosenblum and there is no indication that one cannot possess all of these highly addictive, toxic substances simultaneously.

So the answer to this question must be, unequivocally, YES.

Your young minor daughter, or son can cobble together as many of these poisonous goodies as they can get their hands on, obtained from some shady character on a street corner somewhere or that weird looking pervert sitting on the park bench by the public restrooms at Waterfront park.

So, according to Ellen Rosenblum, herself once a recreational cocaine user, party on Wayne!

And let the devil take the hindmost.

By Don DuPay

Edited by Theresa Griffin Kennedy