Download & Print this Forum Participant Guidelines
Where & When:
Student forums will be held after each block of shows. Room assignments will be explained at the opening of the festival. This information will be posted in the lobby and at the registration desk. A marking on the student’s name tag will determine discussion group assignment. Directors will be given stickers to divide their students among the Forums.
Purpose:
The purpose of Student Forums at a drama festival is to give students the opportunity to exchange ideas and to ask questions relating to the productions they have just seen. This is intended to be an educational experience for all. Each group will be comprised of students from all production companies (whenever possible).
Do & Don't:
Do listen to what everyone has to say in the forum and think about it. What someone says may start a whole new discussion.
Do not interrupt when someone else is speaking. Refrain from side conversations during the discussion. Keep focused on the one discussion at hand.
Participation by everyone is greatly encouraged. Everyone should have the opportunity to voice their comments and ask questions.
Forum Format:
Choreographer Liz Lerman's Critical Response Process is a widely used method for responding to artists' work and a great tool to introduce to students. This is a modified version.
The three roles for participants are:
The performing company offers a work-in-progress, the play, for review and feels prepared to question that work in a dialogue with other people, everyone in the forum;
Responders, audience members, committed to the artist’s intent to make excellent work, offer reactions to the work in a dialogue with the artist; and
The facilitator initiates each step, keeps the process on track, on time, and works to help the artist and responders use the Process to frame useful questions and responses.
The Critical Response Process takes place after a presentation of artistic work. Work can be short or long, large or small, and at any stage in its development. The facilitator then leads the artist and responders through four steps:
Introductions, Performing Company: Name, Show, Role.
One Word Reactions: Everyone in the forum has the opportunity to throw in a one-word reaction to the play. Be sensitive. This is just intended to get the ball rolling.
Performer/Technician as Questioner: Performing company members ask questions about their work. After each question, the responders answer. Responders may express opinions if they are in direct response to the question asked and do not contain suggestions for changes.
Neutral Questions: Responders, audience, ask neutral questions about the work. The performing company members respond. Questions are neutral when they do not have an opinion couched in them. For example, if you are discussing the lighting of a scene, “Why was it so dark?” is not a neutral question. “What was the point of (goal or idea behind) the lighting concept?” is neutral. Do your best.
Statements of Meaning: Responders state what was meaningful, evocative, interesting, exciting, striking in the work they have just witnessed.
Alternate Process: (Performing Company Absent) This is not the time for a free-for-all criticizing the show. Keep it positive. If folks start trash talking the show it will get around and back to the performers, guaranteed. Not cool!
One Word Reactions: Same as above.
Review the Plot: Make sure everyone understands the plot. Fill in each other’s gaps.
Tech Effectiveness: Discuss the effectiveness of the technical elements; set, lights, sound, costumes, etc.
Changes: What might you have done differently?
Statements of Meaning: Responders state what was meaningful, evocative, interesting, exciting, or striking in the work they have just witnessed.
Suggested Topics for Discussion:
Characterization - Voice and Diction - Interaction - Physical Skills - Directing - Staging - Blocking - Tempo - Interpretation - Technical - Lighting - Sound - Make-up - Costuming - Set
Example Performer/Technician Questions asked by artists of those who watched the show.
Were there any physical actions that the actors took that stood out as especially appropriate/inappropriate?
Were there any times in the show where you were especially drawn into or taken out of the moment?
Were there any times when you were confused about the plot?
Was the blocking effective?
Were there any parts of the set that seemed out of place?
Was the show consistent within the time period?
What would you have changed if you were the director? Why?
What especially appealed to you? Why?
Example Neutral Questions asked by responders of those involved in the show:
What was your involvement with the show?
How long did you rehearse?
How many people are in the theater group?
Why was this set chosen for the show? How long did it take to build?
What would you have done differently if you were directing? Why?
Where did your costumes come from?
What problems had to be overcome to participate in festival?
What adaptations did you have to make for this performance venue?
If there were sound selections, why were they chosen?
Were there any script changes?
Example Statement of Meaning stems:
I was struck by
I was interested in
I enjoyed
Rev 1/8/2023