Biomedical study and the human body
critiques of current practice and lost knowledge (Preface to Vesalius's De humani corporis fabrica [1543])
reformed anatomy of the Padua school of Vesalius and followers
new interest in explanations of physiological action
experimentation with bodily systems:
Harvey’s De motu cordis [Anatomical Exercise on the Motion of the Heart and Blood in Living Beings] (1628)
mechanical models within Aristotelian theory: components and linkage
debate over the causes of living things
Francis Bacon’s 'New Philosophy' and the utopian vision of progress [early 1600s]
critique and proposal for a new method ( A New Organon [1620])
new, empirical basis to knowledge
promotion of empiricism and induction
“experiment” as key to new encyclopedic knowledge
technological promise and hopes for worldly society
Galilean mechanical philosophers and Mersenne’s circle (1630s-40s)
methodology of reductionism
mechanistic imagery and causes
goal of a new physics of particles and mechanical properties (Descartes’s The World [written 1633, published 1664]):
quantitatively measure phenomena
express the relationships of parts with mathematics
derive relationships from axioms
critical anti-Scholastic campaign:
attacks on Aristotelian university scholars (Descartes, Hobbes)
public demonstrations: air pressure and vacuum experiments of Torricelli, Pascal, Boyle, Guericke
cultural support in the arts, commerce, consumerism, politics
Machines, consumers, and the “clockwork” analogy
the popular appeal of new technology: machines, clocks, miniaturization, automata
regularity, permanence, predictability
reductionism to component systems
mechanical imagery for causes
parts in linkage
designed order, universal law
broad religious implications
Philosophical search for new methods and Descartes’s Discourse on Method (1637)
method as a foundation for certain knowledge:
1st: critical doubt and examination
2nd: reductionism and empiricism of investigation
3rd: deductive building of explanation
4th: certainty through complete enumeration (and hypothesis comparison and exclusion-testing)
Cartesian mind-body dualism:
separating spirit and matter
the “two spheres” of religion and science
new methodological rigor but overeager (naive) mechanistic goal
Cartesian physics of “matter in motion” (1640s-50s)
the particulate universe
“plenitude” and denying the vacuum
first cause: designed universe and matter put into motion
causes (action) without “forces”:
conservation of “the quantity of motion”
“force of a moving body” and impact: size x speed
a physics for the new astronomy:
acceptance of Kepler’s laws
the vortex, mechanical model of the plenum
Elaborations of experimental technique
Boyle’s program of corpuscular philosophy (1650s-60s)
empiricism and cautious phenomenalism
natural theology as inspiration for practice of science
gentlemen’s involvement in science patronage and practice
Redi’s investigations and experimental design
attacks on Scholastic knowledge and use of Scriptures
innovations of manipulation, comparison, and controls
Shared “research program” on motion
Widespread mathematical and experiment studies: Huygens, Hooke, Wallis, Wren, Newton, Leibniz, Halley (1650s-80s)
mathematical description of mechanics
Huygens’s analysis of the pendulum (1656), patent on a pendulum clock (1656), centrifugal force (1659), and centrifugal motion (1673)
impacts and forces (1668: law of sums of momentum in collisions by Huygens, Wallis, Wren)
attempts to derive Kepler’s Law:
the question of inertia — circular? rectilinear? tangential?
centrifugal acceleration (Huygens in 1673)
inverse square relationships (Hooke, Wren, Halley in 1680s)
The Royal Society of London (1662)
patronage and promotion of science and technology
scientific practice and shared problems
communication and Philosophical Transactions (1665)
gentlemanly values: the practice and status of science
© 2018 Dr. William Kimler