Theory

II. Theory

1. History of the Free-Fall Experiment

The concept of free fall has intrigued scientists and philosophers for centuries, forming a cornerstone in the study of motion and the development of modern physics. The history of free fall traces the evolution of ideas from ancient Greece to the scientific revolution and beyond.

Ancient Greece: Aristotle’s View of Free Fall

The earliest recorded ideas on free fall come from the Greek philosopher Aristotle (384–322 BCE). Aristotle believed heavier objects fall faster than lighter ones, an idea rooted in his broader philosophy that all objects have a "natural place" in the universe. He proposed that the speed of an object in free fall is proportional to its weight, and objects fall at a constant speed without accelerating. This incorrect theory persisted for centuries due to Aristotle's influence on Western thought.

Renaissance and Galileo’s Revolution

The Aristotelian view of free fall remained largely unchallenged until the Renaissance, when scientists began questioning traditional knowledge. Galileo Galilei (1564–1642) revolutionized the understanding of free fall. Around 1600, Galileo conducted experiments that refuted Aristotle's ideas.

According to legend, Galileo dropped spheres of different masses from the Leaning Tower of Pisa to demonstrate that all objects, regardless of mass, fall at the same rate without air resistance. While the historical accuracy of this event is debated, it is clear that Galileo conducted similar experiments using inclined planes, carefully measuring the time it took for objects to roll down at various angles. His experiments led him to formulate the law of free fall:

All objects accelerate at the same rate under the influence of gravity, regardless of their mass.

Galileo’s work marked a significant shift toward experimental science, emphasizing observation and measurement rather than philosophical speculation.

Isaac Newton: Gravity and Free Fall

In the late 17th century, Isaac Newton (1642–1727) built upon Galileo’s work and provided the mathematical framework to describe free fall. In his book Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687), Newton formulated the laws of motion and the law of universal gravitation.

Newton’s second law of motion states:

F=ma

F is the force acting on an object, m is the object's mass, and a is its acceleration. In the case of free fall, the force is gravity, and the acceleration is g, the acceleration due to gravity. Newton’s law of universal gravitation describes the gravitational force between two masses, showing that gravity is a universal force that acts between all objects with mass.

Newton's insights provided the theoretical underpinning for free fall. They explained why objects fall at the same rate—because the force of gravity is proportional to mass, which cancels out when determining acceleration.

Einstein and General Relativity

In the early 20th century, Albert Einstein (1879–1955) offered a new perspective on gravity with his theory of general relativity. While Newton’s laws accurately describe free fall in most situations, Einstein’s theory explains gravity as the result of the curvature of spacetime caused by massive objects.

In general relativity, objects in free fall move along the straightest possible paths (geodesics) in curved spacetime. This theory predicts that the force of gravity affects not only the motion of objects but also the passage of time and the path of light.

Einstein’s theory was confirmed by experiments such as observing light bending around massive objects, demonstrating that free fall is not just a mechanical motion but part of a more profound interaction between mass, space, and time.

2. Theory of the Free-Fall Experiment Using Video Analysis

In this experiment, the objective is to measure the acceleration due to gravity, g, by analyzing the free fall of a ball using video analysis. The free fall motion is governed by the basic principles of kinematics under constant acceleration, specifically gravity.

3. Kinematics of Free Fall

When an object is dropped from rest (initial velocity, v0=0) from a certain height, it experiences a uniform acceleration due to gravity, g. The following kinematic equation can describe the motion of the object:

Where:

y is the displacement of the object (in this case, the height fallen),
v0 is the initial velocity of the object,
g is the acceleration due to gravity,
t is the time taken for the object to fall.

Since the object is dropped from rest, v0=0, simplifying the equation to:

From this equation, the acceleration due to gravity g can be calculated as:

4. Consider Sources of g-value Error

The accuracy of the result depends on the precise calibration of the video (to convert pixel measurements to physical distances), the frame rate, and the precision in tracking the ball's position over time.

Sources of Error

Several factors could introduce errors into the experiment:

Air resistance: Although minimal for short distances, air resistance could slightly affect the ball's motion.
Frame rate limitations: A low frame rate reduces the time resolution, affecting the accuracy of the time measurement.
Calibration errors: Improper n (e.g., incorrect pixel-to-distance conversion) could lead to inaccuracies in determining displacement.

By minimizing these sources of error, the experiment accurately measures the acceleration due to gravity, g, typically close to the accepted value of 9.81 m/s².

5. Consider Sources of g-value Error: Air Resistance

Air resistance would significantly alter the motion of a free-falling object, particularly if the object has a large surface area or is falling through air for a considerable distance. Here’s how it would affect the simulation and the overall motion:

1. Effect on Acceleration:

Without air resistance, the acceleration is constant at g=9.81 m/s².
With air resistance, the acceleration decreases over time as the velocity increases because air resistance is proportional to velocity (or velocity squared for higher speeds).
The net force on the object becomes Fnet=mg−Fair,

where Fair is the force due to air resistance.

2. Terminal Velocity:

In the presence of air resistance, an object will eventually stop accelerating and reach a terminal velocity. This is the point at which the force of air resistance equals the gravitational force, and the object falls at a constant speed.
The terminal velocity depends on the object's shape, size, and mass, as well as the properties of the medium (e.g., air density).

3. Slower Descent:

The object would fall more slowly than the simple free-fall equation predicted, especially at higher velocities when air resistance becomes significant.

4. Non-linear Height vs. Time Relationship:

The relationship between height and time would no longer be purely quadratic. The object would initially accelerate as predicted by gravity, but over time, the effect of air resistance would slow the acceleration. The curve would flatten out as the object approaches terminal velocity.

Incorporating Air Resistance in the Simulation:

Air resistance can be modeled using drag force, which for many objects is proportional to the square of the velocity:

Where:

Cd is the drag coefficient,
ρ is the air density,
A is the cross-sectional area of the object,
v is the velocity.

To simulate free fall with air resistance, we would solve the differential equation that results from Newton’s second law:

6. Modern Understanding and Applications

Today, the concept of free fall is central to physics and engineering. In a vacuum, where air resistance is absent, all objects fall with the same acceleration due to gravity, approximately 9.81 m/s² on Earth. The study of free fall extends beyond Earth, with applications in astronautics, where objects in orbit are in continuous free fall, giving rise to the experience of weightlessness.

Experimental techniques, including video analysis, high-precision timing devices, and vacuum chambers, have refined our ability to measure and analyze free fall. Modern experiments in physics continue to explore the nuances of gravity, including the behavior of objects in free fall in different gravitational fields and the ongoing search for a theory that unites general relativity with quantum mechanics.

Page updated

Report abuse