Illustration By: Gian Iguis
Written By: Mariann Victoria E. Fernandez
The recent Typhoon Paeng made Undas 2022 a rainy experience for Filipinos. As every family visits their loved ones in several cemeteries, our family went to Manila North Cemetery and came across a certain place that we truly disagreed with.
In the year 2019, there was an incident in Quezon City, Cubao wherein a transgender woman, Gretchen Diez, was arrested by the Quezon City Police District for entering and using the female restroom and recording it for a Facebook live. This issue caused a huge impact in the media and a lot of people expressed their own stance.
Having that said, I would also like to express my opinion and evaluate my claims on this issue. Going back to what my family and I saw last November 1 in Manila North Cemetery, it’s about the public portalet that is labeled with ‘LALAKE’, ‘BABAE’, and ‘LGBT’. The label ‘LGBT’ made us oppose and wonder at the same time. A member of the LGBTQ+ community can identify as a man or a woman, regardless of gender. Women can identify themselves as women and still be part of the LGBTQ+ community. Men can identify themselves as men and still be part of the LGBTQ+ community.
“For me, it was unnecessary. It just gives people a chance to label people and discriminate against people who use things differently. We all pee the same, parehas lang mapanghi at mabaho. It was unnecessary and prejudiced. Para saan 'yung extra portalet? Why not just say IT IS a portalet. What made them label it? Maybe para sabihing inclusive. But people, whether we like it or not, will just feel shy or nervous to use such things/portalets. Also, if people have a problem with using such portalets because of their genders, it would be trans women who may be seen as a threat kapag pumasok sa women's bathroom, or a trans man na mahihiyang pumasok sa men's bathroom because they had to pee sitting down or sa women's bathroom because they are not THAT - a girl, I mean. Portalets, you use by yourself, bakit need ng label? You're using it alone, walang makakakita. Putting "GENDER" labels on portalets are stupid, tbh. And if left with no choice, people will choose what they feel is correct. Kung babae ka, kahit bi ka or lesbian, you'll choose the "female" portalet. Kung bading naman, for the "male" portalets.” [Fershemae Panag, a relative of mine with me when we visit the cemetery, and part of the LGBTQ+ community]
Our country is known for being religious; in fact, it is part of our culture and tradition. A relative of mine would probably say, ‘Edi pumunta ka sa kahit saan, pareho ka namang babae and parte ng LGBTQ+ community’, and they may think that this is apparently not an important matter for us. Imagine that you are choosing, contemplating, and worrying about where to go just to relieve yourself, which you actually need to do. Alright, I’ll go to the women's restroom because I identify myself as a woman. But seeing the LGBT-labeled portalet made me even think that, ‘Hindi lang ito tungkol sa pag ihi at pag dumi.’, it was giving me something else. There is a deeper context and impact to this. I don’t want this topic to be seen as ‘simple to solve’. I sure can go to both portalets, but can we still discuss how the labeled portalets are unnecessary?
An LGBT-labeled portalet is unnecessary, and I believe that it doesn’t perform inclusivity at all. Noting what Fershemae has mentioned, why do you need to label it if you are alone inside and you would not be able to interact with someone? If that was the concern, then there is no need to label it. Besides, portalets have always been unlabeled. It was in fact my first time seeing a labeled portalet which is why it has caught my attention. Additionally, if it was really inclusive, then why not have an all-gender—like a normal unlabeled portalet—where every individual can enter and use? The Manila North Cemetery did not directly mention that it performs and promotes inclusivity as to why they have labeled the portalets, however, all communities should be inclusive regardless of gender, sexuality, race, and social status. On a different note, I personally avoid drinking a lot of liquid outdoors just to prevent myself from going to the restroom. Since we entered the pandemic, I’ve been very cautious about going to restrooms as I could be exposed there. But seeing and realizing how some individuals among the LGBTQ+ community purposely prevent themselves from drinking and eating a lot outdoors because they don’t want to go to restrooms is different and a lot more painful to face. I could prepare a hygiene kit in just five minutes, but I couldn’t change a system within that duration; it would probably take us a lot more discrimination, stigma, and stereotypes before it may or may not happen.
There is a fine line between accepting and tolerating. When you accept something, you truly understand and recognize it, you even see the significance of it. When you tolerate, you simply agree with it because you know it's right and the right thing to do.You do nothing and say nothing; you just let it be there because you tolerate it. It’s very painful for me to see that they are more tolerating than accepting when it comes to the LGBTQ+ community.