Shailaja Dadhwal

SIP Offer: Auctus Advisors

Undergrad: Hansraj College, DU

Workex: Fresher

How did you prepare for the interview?

My preparation started with the 4 member group that CRUX made. Initially, I played the role of an observer in the group.  Solving cases with the seniors also helped me get a reality check on my progress. Post-case analysis was perhaps the most important part of my preparation as it helped me understand my strengths and weaknesses. 

Personally, I believe that post-case analysis should be done after some time so that your mind is fresh again and unbiased with your first attempt. 

I also found unconventional cases to be extremely important as they mimic real-life cases where you need to think on the go. One should keep solving unconventional cases from the very start and not leave them for the end.

Can you briefly describe the process and the type of questions in the interview?

For Auctus I had 3 rounds. The first was a buddy round done on the call before the consult day. In this round, I was asked to make a decision tree and give answers in numbers. 


The second round was more of a behavioral round where I was asked different situational questions. It was mostly stakeholder management. In this same round, I was given an unconventional case where I was told that our client is a high-net-worth individual who wants to donate 200 million USD to ensure that the primary school dropout rate is zero. I was asked to find out if this quantum of money was sufficient. I used the 4A framework and found out that staff training was the pain point. I was further asked to a guesstimate of the number of teachers, students, and the money required to decrease the dropout rate in primary schools. 


My third round was a holistic CV  and a  traditional case-based round. 

In retrospect, what would you have done differently?

I feel like I started my case analysis quite late.  I would have really liked to increase the number of cases and case analyses that I did. Also, more unconventional cases would have been good as they would have helped me test my inherent case-solving abilities. 


I would also want to do more cases with my seniors and spend some time developing my own frameworks and case-solving style. I had a few personal case  solving approaches but I would have wanted to spend more time there.