Source: CNN News
Spanish article: https://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2020/02/20/beneficios-y-algo-de-ciencia-sorprendente-de-tener-una-mascota/
Tools used: MateCat & DeepL.
A propósito de la celebración del «Día nacional de amar a tu mascota» en Estados Unidos —que se celebra el 20 de febrero— tenemos algunos datos sorprendentes sobre los beneficios de tener mascotas en casa.
On the occasion of the celebration of "National Day to Love Your Pet" in the United States - which is celebrated on February 20 - we have some surprising facts about the benefits of having pets at home.
In celebration of "National Love Your Pet Day" in the United States - celebrated on February 20 - we have some surprising facts about the benefits of having pets at home.
Entendemos que todos los días en tu casa son el día de «amar a tu mascota» y que te acurrucas junto a tus gatitos mientras sus pechos peludos retumban suavemente, un antídoto comprobado para el estrés del día.
We understand that every day at home is "love your pet" day and that you snuggle up next to your kitties as their furry chests rumble softly, a proven antidote to the stress of the day.
We understand that every day at your house is "love your pet" day and that you snuggle up next to your kitties as their furry chests gently rumble, a proven antidote to the stress of the day.
Para mí y millones más, tener una mascota trae un círculo de amor a nuestras vidas: dan afecto, nosotros lo devolvemos y todos somos mejores para eso.
For me and millions more, having a pet brings a circle of love into our lives: they give affection, we give it back, and we are all better at it.
For me and millions more, having a pet brings a circle of love into our lives: they give affection, we return it and we are all the better for it.
Y la ciencia está de acuerdo en eso.
And science agrees on that.
and science agrees with that.
«Tengo una lista de 10 beneficios para la salud [que] los estudios han demostrado que los dueños de mascotas tienen», dijo el psicólogo Harold Herzog, un profesor amante de las mascotas en la Universidad de Western Carolina que ha estudiado durante mucho tiempo la conexión entre humanos y animales.
"I have a list of 10 health benefits [that] studies have shown pet owners have," said psychologist Harold Herzog, a pet-loving professor at Western Carolina University who has long studied the connection between humans and animals.
"I have a list of 10 health benefits [that] studies have shown pet owners have," said psychologist Harold Herzog, a pet-loving professor at Western Carolina University who has long studied the human-animal connection.
«Mayores tasas de supervivencia, menos ataques cardíacos, menos soledad, mejor presión arterial, mejor bienestar psicológico, menores tasas de depresión y niveles de estrés, menos visitas al médico, mayor autoestima, mejor sueño y más actividad física», son solo algunos de los beneficios registrados de la propiedad de mascotas, dijo Herzog.
"Higher survival rates, fewer heart attacks, less loneliness, better blood pressure, better psychological well-being, lower rates of depression and stress levels, fewer visits to the doctor, higher self-esteem, better sleep and more physical activity", are just a few of the recorded benefits of pet ownership, Herzog said.
"Higher survival rates, fewer heart attacks, less loneliness, better blood pressure, better psychological well-being, lower rates of depression and stress levels, fewer doctor visits, higher self-esteem, better sleep and more physical activity," are just some of the recorded benefits of pet ownership, Herzog said.
Herzog también señala estudios que encontraron que los dueños de mascotas «tienen más probabilidades de estar solos, deprimidos y tener ataques de pánico, más probabilidades de tener asma, obesidad, presión arterial alta, úlceras gástricas, dolores de cabeza por migraña, y usar más medicina, etcétera».
Herzog also points to studies that found that pet owners "are more likely to be lonely, depressed, and have panic attacks, more likely to have asthma, obesity, high blood pressure, gastric ulcers, migraine headaches, and use more. medicine, etcetera.
Herzog also points to studies that found pet owners "are more likely to be lonely, depressed and have panic attacks, more likely to have asthma, obesity, high blood pressure, gastric ulcers, migraine headaches, and use more medicine, and so on."
Como ocurre a menudo en la ciencia, los estudios han tenido resultados mixtos. Algunas investigaciones muestran los beneficios de tener una mascota, otros estudios dicen que no hay diferencia entre la salud de aquellos que poseen y no poseen mascotas. Aún más investigaciones sugieren que incluso podría haber aspectos negativos sobre la propiedad de mascotas (y no solo nos referimos a recoger caca del patio).
As is often the case in science, studies have had mixed results. Some research°shows the benefits°of having a pet, other studies say°there is no difference°between the health of those who own and do not own pets. Even more research suggests°there could even be negatives°to pet ownership (and we're not just talking about pooping from the yard).
As is often the case in science, studies have had mixed results. Some research shows the benefits of pet ownership, other studies say there is no difference between the health of those who own and don't own pets. Still more research suggests that there may even be negative aspects to pet ownership (and we don't just mean picking up poop from the yard).
Así es. A pesar del hecho de que estamos convencidos de las bendiciones que nuestros bebés peludos traen a nuestras vidas, la ciencia aún no ha demostrado definitivamente que las mascotas sean buenas para nuestra salud.
That's right. Despite the fact that we are convinced of the blessings that our furry babies bring into our lives, science has yet to definitively prove that pets are good for our health.
That's right. Despite the fact that we are convinced of the blessings our furry babies bring to our lives, science has yet to definitively prove that pets are good for our health.
«Muchos de nosotros que tenemos mascotas pensamos: ‘Oh, deben ser uniformemente bien para nosotros'», dijo Megan Mueller, codirectora del Instituto Tufts para la Interacción Humano-Animal y orgullosa propietaria de un perro y un conejillo de Indias.
"Many of us who have pets think, 'Oh, they must be uniformly fine for us,'" said Megan Mueller, co-director of the Tufts Institute for Human-Animal Interaction and proud owner of a dog and a guinea pig.
"Many of us who have pets think, 'Oh, they must be uniformly good for us,'" said Megan Mueller, co-director of the Tufts Institute for Human-Animal Interaction and proud owner of a dog and a guinea pig.
«Estamos descubriendo que es un poco más complicado de lo que pensábamos originalmente», agregó.» Siempre digo que no es una gran pregunta: ‘¿Son nuestras mascotas buenas para nosotros?'»
"We are finding that it is a bit more complicated than we originally thought," he added. " I always say it's not a big question: 'Are our pets good for us?' "
"We're finding it's a little more complicated than we originally thought," he added." I always say it's not a great question: 'Are our pets good for us?'"
«¿Para quién son buenas las mascotas, bajo qué circunstancias, y es la combinación perfecta entre la persona y la mascota?».
"Who are pets good for, under what circumstances, and is it the perfect match between person and pet?"
"Who are pets good for, under what circumstances, and is it the perfect match between the person and the pet?".
Los dueños de mascotas ciertamente creen que sus mascotas brindan apoyo emocional, especialmente en momentos de estrés, dijo Mueller, y afortunadamente la ciencia parece respaldar eso.
Pet owners certainly believe that their pets provide emotional support, especially in times of stress, Mueller said, and luckily science seems to back that up.
Pet owners certainly believe their pets provide emotional support, especially in times of stress, Mueller said, and fortunately the science seems to back that up.
«Hay algunas investigaciones que muestran que tener una mascota contigo durante un evento ansioso podría ayudar a reducir el estrés de ese evento», dijo.
"There is some research showing that having a pet with you during an anxious event could help reduce the stress of that event," he said.
"There is some research showing that having a pet with you during an anxious event may help reduce the stress of that event," he said.
«Los estudios han demostrado repetidamente que el buen humor de las personas aumenta y el mal humor disminuye alrededor de las mascotas», dijo Herzog. «Y sabemos que hay beneficios inmediatos a corto plazo, fisiológicos y psicológicos, al interactuar con las mascotas. No tengo ninguna duda al respecto».
"Studies have repeatedly shown that people's good spirits increase and bad moods decrease around pets," Herzog said. And we know that there are immediate short-term physiological and psychological benefits to interacting with pets. I have no doubt about that.
"Studies have repeatedly shown that people's good moods increase and bad moods decrease around pets," Herzog said. "And we know there are immediate short-term physiological and psychological benefits to interacting with pets. I have no doubt about that."
Pero aún no se puede decir lo mismo sobre la depresión.
But the same cannot yet be said about depression.
But the same cannot yet be said about depression.
Herzog realizó 30 estudios sobre el tema: Dieciocho no mostraron diferencias en las tasas de depresión entre las personas con mascotas y las que no; cinco concluyeron que tener una mascota alivió los síntomas depresivos; se encontró que cinco mascotas empeoraron la depresión; y el resto no fueron concluyentes.
Herzog conducted°30 studies°on the subject: Eighteen showed no difference in depression rates between people with pets and those without pets; five concluded that having a pet alleviated depressive symptoms; Five pets were found to make depression worse; and the rest were inconclusive.
Herzog conducted 30 studies on the subject: eighteen showed no difference in rates of depression between people with pets and those without; five concluded that having a pet relieved depressive symptoms; five pets were found to worsen depression; and the rest were inconclusive.
Un estudio de ancianos realizado por Mueller encontró que los dueños de mascotas tenían aproximadamente el doble de probabilidades de haber tenido depresión en el pasado, pero no reportaron depresión en la última semana. ¿Obtuvieron una mascota y luego se deprimieron o la mascota ayudó a terminar con la depresión? No está claro.
A°study of the elderly°by Mueller found that pet owners were about twice as likely to have had depression in the past, but did not report depression in the past week. Did they get a pet and then get depressed or did the pet help end the depression? Unclear
A study of seniors by Mueller found that pet owners were about twice as likely to have had depression in the past, but did not report depression in the past week. Did they get a pet and then become depressed, or did the pet help end the depression? Unclear.
Una de las razones por las que la ciencia es tan dudosa sobre el tema de las mascotas y nuestra salud es que es casi imposible llevar a cabo el «estándar de oro» de los estudios: un ensayo controlado aleatorio donde el investigador controla todos los factores y luego al azar asigna una mascota al grupo de prueba.
One of the reasons why science is so dubious about the subject of pets and our health is that it is almost impossible to carry out the "golden standard" of studies: a randomized controlled trial where the researcher controls all the factors and then randomly assigns a pet to the test group.
One of the reasons science is so dubious on the subject of pets and our health is that it is nearly impossible to conduct the "gold standard" of studies: a randomized controlled trial where the investigator controls for all factors and then randomly assigns a pet to the test group.
«Es realmente difícil hacer estudios aleatorios porque la mayoría de las personas quieren elegir si quieren o no una mascota y elegir quiénes son sus mascotas», dijo Mueller.
"It's really difficult to do randomized studies because most people want to choose whether or not they want a pet and who their pets are," Mueller said.
"It's really hard to do randomized studies because most people want to choose whether or not they want a pet and choose who their pets are," Mueller said.
Respaldado por una asociación de 9 millones de dólares entre la Rama de Desarrollo y Comportamiento Infantil del Instituto Nacional de Salud de Estados Unidos y el Instituto de Ciencias de Cuidado de Mascotas Waltham del Reino Unido, algunos investigadores han comenzado a diseñar mejores estudios para determinar si son los animales los que tienen el impacto.
Backed by a $ 9 million partnership between the Child Development and Behavior Branch of the US National Institute of Health and the UK Waltham Institute of Pet Grooming Sciences, some researchers have begun to design better studies to determine whether it's the animals that have the impact.
Backed by a $9 million partnership between the Child Development and Behavior Branch of the U.S. National Institute of Health and the Waltham Institute of Pet Care Sciences in the United Kingdom, some researchers have begun to design better studies to determine whether it is the animals that are having the impact.
Un estudio de 2015 encontró que los niños con Trastorno por déficit de atención con hiperactividad (TDAH) que les leían a animales reales mostraron más mejoras en el intercambio, la cooperación, el voluntariado y los problemas de comportamiento que los niños con TDAH que le leían a un animal de peluche. Otro estudio encontró que los niños autistas estaban más tranquilos e interactuaban más en presencia de conejillos de indias que de juguetes.
A 2015 study found that°children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder°(ADHD) who read to real animals showed more improvements in sharing, cooperation, volunteering, and behavior problems than children with ADHD who read to them. to a stuffed animal. Another°study°found that autistic children were calmer and more interacting in the presence of guinea pigs than toys.
A 2015 study found that children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) who read to real animals showed more improvement in sharing, cooperation, volunteering, and behavioral problems than ADHD children who read to a stuffed animal. Another study found that autistic children were calmer and interacted more in the presence of guinea pigs than toys.
Un estudio aleatorio de cuatro meses de duración realizado en la Universidad de Vanderbilt en Nashville proporcionó a los niños acceso a perros de terapia justo antes de someterse a un tratamiento contra el cáncer. Todos los niños lo disfrutaron, pero no hubo una disminución en los niveles de ansiedad entre los niños en el grupo de prueba y los del grupo de control.
A°four-month-long randomized study°conducted at Vanderbilt University in Nashville°provided children°with access to therapy dogs just before undergoing cancer treatment. All the children enjoyed it, but there was no decrease in anxiety levels between the children in the test group and those in the control group.
A four-month randomized study conducted at Vanderbilt University in Nashville provided children with access to therapy dogs just prior to undergoing cancer treatment. All the children enjoyed it, but there was no decrease in anxiety levels between the children in the test group and those in the control group.
Los padres de los niños que tenían perros de terapia, sin embargo, mostraron una disminución significativa en la ansiedad de los padres sobre el dolor y la capacidad de sobrellevar de sus hijos.
Parents of children who owned therapy dogs, however, showed a significant decrease in parental anxiety about pain and their children's ability to cope.
Parents of children who had therapy dogs, however, showed a significant decrease in parental anxiety about their children's pain and coping ability.
Otro método de investigación que se está utilizando, dijo Mueller, son los estudios longitudinales, en los que se sigue a un gran número de personas durante largos períodos de tiempo. La esperanza es que estos estudios, y los experimentos más diseñados científicamente, descubrirán razones más precisas de por qué una mascota en particular podría, o no, ser una buena opción para una persona y sus necesidades.
Another research method being used, Mueller said, is longitudinal studies, in which large numbers of people are followed over long periods of time. The hope is that these studies, and the more scientifically designed experiments, will uncover more precise reasons why a particular pet might, or might not, be a good fit for a person and their needs.
Another research method being used, Mueller said, is longitudinal studies, in which large numbers of people are followed over long periods of time. The hope is that these studies, and more scientifically designed experiments, will uncover more precise reasons why a particular pet might, or might not, be a good fit for a person and his or her needs.
Un día, dice Mueller, podría ser posible ‘recetar’ un perro para un niño activo joven, un adolescente con problemas o paciente cardiovascular y saber, por mucho que la ciencia pueda saber, cuál es el resultado probable para su salud.
One day, Mueller says, it might be possible to 'prescribe' a dog for a young active child, troubled teenager or cardiovascular patient and know, as much as science may know, what the likely outcome is for their health.
One day, Mueller says, it may be possible to 'prescribe' a dog for a young active child, a troubled teenager or cardiovascular patient and know, as much as science can know, what the likely outcome is for their health.
Tal vez finalmente tengamos datos para poner detrás del debate «gato contra perro», o simplemente cómo y por qué un pájaro, pez, lagarto o jerbo podría calmar nuestro estrés y brindar compañía.
Perhaps we finally have data to put behind the "cat versus dog" debate, or simply how and why a bird, fish, lizard, or gerbil could ease our stress and provide companionship.
Perhaps we finally have data to put behind the "cat vs. dog" debate, or simply how and why a bird, fish, lizard or gerbil might soothe our stress and provide companionship.
Hasta entonces, compañeros amantes de las mascotas, tengo la intención de volver a lo que intuitivamente sé: mis mascotas son algunas de las «personas» más amorosas de mi vida, y eso, si nada más, los hace buenos para mí.
Until then, fellow pet lovers, I intend to get back to what I intuitively know: My pets are some of the most loving "people" in my life, and that, if nothing else, makes them good for me.
Until then, fellow pet lovers, I intend to go back to what I intuitively know: my pets are some of the most loving "people" in my life, and that, if nothing else, makes them good for me.
In relation of the celebration of "National Day to Love Your Pet" in the United States - which is celebrated on February 20 - we have some surprising facts about the benefits of having pets at home.
We understand that every day at home is "love your pet" day and that you snuggle up next to your kitties as their furry chests gently rumble, a proven antidote to the stress of the day.
For millions more of people and for me, having a pet brings a circle of love into our lives: they give us affection, we give it back, and we are all better for it.
And science agrees with it.
"I have a list of 10 health benefits [that] studies have shown pet owners have," said the psychologist Harold Herzog, a pet-loving professor at Western Carolina University who has long studied the connection between humans and animals.
"Higher survival rates, fewer heart attacks, less loneliness, better blood pressure, better psychological well-being, lower rates of depression and stress levels, fewer visits to the doctor, higher self-esteem, better sleep and more physical activity", are just a few of the recorded benefits of pet ownership, Herzog said.
Herzog also points out to studies that found that pet owners "are more likely to be lonely, depressed and have panic attacks, more likely to have asthma, obesity, high blood pressure, gastric ulcers, migraine headaches, and use more medicine, and so on."
As is often the case in science, studies have had mixed results. Some research°shows the benefits°of pet ownership, other studies say°there is no difference°between the health of those who own pets and do not own pets. Even more research suggests°there may even be negatives aspects °to pet ownership (and we don't just mean picking up poop from the yard).
That's right. Despite the fact that we are convinced of the blessings that our furry babies bring into our lives, science has yet to definitively prove that pets are good for our health.
"Many of us who have pets think, 'Oh, they must be uniformly good for us,'" said Megan Mueller, co-director of the Tufts Institute for Human-Animal Interaction and proud owner of a dog and a guinea pig.
"We are finding out that it is a bit more complicated than we originally thought," he added. " I always say it's not a great question: 'Are our pets good for us?' "
"To whom are pets good for, under what circumstances, and is it the perfect match between a person and a pet?".
Pet owners certainly believe that their pets provide emotional support, especially in times of stress, Mueller said, and fortunately the science seems to back that up.
"There are some research showing that owning a pet with you during an anxious event may help you to reduce the stress of that event," he said.
"Studies have repeatedly shown that people's good moods increase and bad moods decrease around pets," Herzog said. "And we knowthat there are immediate short-term physiological and psychological benefits while interacting with pets. I have no doubt about that."
But the same cannot yet be said about depression.
Herzog conducted°30 studies°on the subject: Eighteen of them showed no difference in depression rates between people with pets and those without pets; five concluded that owning a pet relieved depressive symptoms; Five pets were found to make depression worse; and the rest were inconclusive.
A study of seniors by Mueller found out that pet owners were about twice as likely to have had depression in the past, but did not report depression in the past week. Did they get a pet and then become depressed, or did the pet help end the depression? Unclear.
One of the reasons why science is so dubious about the subject of pets and our health is that it is nearly impossible to carry out the "golden standard" of studies: a randomized controlled trial where the researcher controls all the factors and then randomly assigns a pet to the test group.
"It is not easier to do randomized studies because most people want to choose whether or not they want a pet and choose who their pets are," Mueller said.
Backed by a $9 million partnership between the Child Development and Behavior Branch of the U.S. National Institute of Health and the Waltham Institute of Pet Care Sciences in the United Kingdom, some researchers have begun to design better studies to determine whether it is the animals that are having the impact.
A 2015 study found that children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) who read to real animals showed more improvement in sharing, cooperation, volunteering, and behavioral problems than ADHD children who read to a stuffed animal. Another study found that autistic children were calmer and interacted more in the presence of guinea pigs than toys.
A four-month randomized study conducted at Vanderbilt University in Nashville provided children with access to therapy dogs just prior to undergoing cancer treatment. All the children enjoyed it, but there was no decrease in anxiety levels between the children in the test group and those in the control group.
Parents of children who owned therapy dogs, however, showed a significant decrease in parental anxiety about their children's pain and coping ability.
Another research method being used, Mueller said, is longitudinal studies, in which large numbers of people are followed over long periods of time. The hope is that these studies, and the more scientifically designed experiments, will uncover more precise reasons why a particular pet might, or might not, be a good fit for a person and their needs.
One day, Mueller says, it might be possible to 'prescribe' a dog for a young active child, troubled teenager or cardiovascular patient and know, as much as science may know, what the likely outcome is for their health.
Perhaps we finally have data to put behind the "cat vs dog" debate, or simply how and why a bird, fish, lizard, or gerbil might soothe our stress and provide companionship.
Until then, fellow pet lovers, I intend to go back to what I intuitively know: my pets are some of the most loving "people" in my life, and that, if nothing else, makes them good for me.
Haven't seen or noticed difficulties with those cat tools at the moment, only that in some way people need to review it since many of the cat tools just translate in a literal way and it will lose completely the sense in the sentence. Also there are also some words that the cat tools used to make the translation more professional , but at the end we need to see if the meaning of the word is being adapted to what we are seeking for.