中小企業を考える

Thinking about SMEs

【1】中小企業とは何か

2021年1月 黒瀬直宏

中小企業とは何かを考える

 菅政権は「中小企業再編」を中小企業政策の重点としています。中小企業の生産性はどの国でも大企業より低いが、特に日本では低く、しかも、他より中小企業で働く人の割合が高い。これが日本の一人当たりGDPが他の先進国より低い原因だ。だから中小企業を合併などで大きくし、生産性をあげねばならない――という考えに基づきます。これは、菅首相のブレーンで、「成長戦略会議」の委員でもあるデーヴィッド・アトキンソン氏の持論ですが、中小企業を生産性の低い企業と決めつけ、諸悪の根源のごとくに主張するのは暴論です。では、中小企業とはどのような企業と考えるべきなのか。中小企業に対する従来の見方は次の2つに大別されます。

問題型中小企業論

 一つは、戦前来の、中小企業は低生産性・低賃金の発展性の低い企業で、日本経済の問題の集約点という見方で(これを問題型中小企業論と呼ぶことにします)、かつては政府を含む大方の考えでした。アトキンソン氏の中小企業論も一応ここに分類できますが、当時の問題型中小企業論は発展性の低い中小企業の存在の根源を日本資本主義の後進性や大企業への経済力集中の結果と考えており、中小企業保護策が中小企業を生み出しているとする(眉唾ものの)アトキンソン氏の考えとは異なります

 かつて「二重構造」という言葉が流布していました。日本は一方で欧米にも劣らない近代的大企業、他方に前近代的な中小企業が両極に対立している。いわば、一国のうちに先進国と後進国の二重構造が存在するのに等しいとするもので(『経済白書(1957年度)』)、日本資本主義の後進性に中小企業の問題性の根源を求めるものです。

積極型中小企業論

 高度成長期における中小企業の革新・発展を背景に、問題型中小企業論への異論として積極型中小企業論が提起されました。中小企業は活力に満ちた発展力のある企業で、国民経済で積極的な役割を果たすとするものです。1960年代の半ばころから現れ、政府の中小企業に対する見方にも影響を与えました。『中小企業白書1970年版』では中小企業を低賃金という基盤がなくても、中小規模の有利性によって存続できる企業としました。中小企業に対する積極的見方はさらに進み、中小企業は「活力ある多数」で「経済社会の進歩と発展の原動力」「創造の母体」などとされました(中小企業政策審議会「80年代中小企業ビジョン」、同「90年代中小企業ビジョン」)。1999年に抜本改正された中小企業基本法(新基本法)も同様の中小企業観に立っています。

複眼的中小企業論の必要

 私は問題型・積極型中小企業論はそれぞれ正しい面もありますが、中小企業の一側面のみを捉えた部分理論だと思います。例えば、問題型中小企業論では、高度成長期以後の中小企業が革新により国際競争力の原動力になった事実を説明できません。積極型中小企業論は中小企業の発展性を強調するあまり中小企業が抱えている問題を軽視、90年代以降の中小企業経営の困難化を説明できません。私は「中小企業は大企業にない固有の発展性を内在させているが、その発現を妨げる固有の問題性も課せられている。そのため、中小企業は発展性と問題性の統一物になる」と見るべきと思います。発展性も問題性も中小企業の本質を共に構成するものとして理論的に包括し、「統一理解」すべきです。両者を同時に視野にいれるため複眼的中小企業論と自称しています。実は、この理論の源は中小企業家同友会にあります。同友会会員は中小企業の発展性や役割に確信を持ちながら中小企業が持つ問題も認識し、良き経営環境を実現しようと努力しています。複眼的中小企業論はこのような同友会の姿勢から学んだ考えなのです。

(1) What are SMEs ?

KUROSE Naohiro, January 2021

Thinking about what is SME

The Suga Administration is focusing on "SME Reorganization" in their SME Policy. The productivity of SMEs is lower than that of large companies in every country, but especially in Japan, and the percentage of people working in SMEs is higher than others. This is the reason why Japan's GDP per capita is lower than that of other developed countries. Therefore, the Administration's Policy is based on the idea that small and medium-sized enterprises must be enlarged through mergers to increase productivity. This is the theory of Mr. David Atkinson, Prime Minister Suga's brain and a member of the "Growth Strategy Council", but it is an outrage to categorize SMEs as low-productivity companies and argue that they are the root of all evil. .. Then, what kind of company should be considered as a small and medium-sized enterprise? The traditional view of SMEs can be broadly divided into the following two.

Problem-type SME Theory

One is an idea since before the war to regard SMEs are low in productivity, with low-wage, and low-development enterprises, and are viewed as the central point of problems in the Japanese economy (let me call this as the Problem-type SME Theory). It used to be the idea of ​​most, including the government. Mr. Atkinson's theory of SMEs can be categorized here, but the Problem-type SME Theory at that time was the result of the backwardness of Japanese capitalism and the concentration of economic power on large companies as the root of the existence of SMEs with low development potential. It is different from Mr. Atkinson's idea that SME protection measures by the government are creating SMEs.

The word "double structure" was once popular. On the one hand, Japan is as modern as large enterprises, and on the other hand, pre-modern SMEs are at odds with each other. So to speak, it is equivalent to the existence of a dual structure of developed and underdeveloped countries in one country ("Economic White Paper (1957)"), and they sought the root of the problematic nature of SMEs in the backwardness of Japanese capitalism.

Promising-type SME Theory

Against the background of innovation and development of SMEs during the period of high economic growth, the theory of Aggressive SMEs was raised as an objection to the theory of Problem-type SME. SMEs are vibrant and vibrant enterprises that play an active role in the national economy. Appearing in the mid-1960s, it also influenced the government's view of SMEs. In the "White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprises 1970", small and medium enterprises are made to survive by the advantage of small and medium enterprises without the foundation of low wages. The positive view of SMEs has further advanced, and SMEs have been described as "a vibrant majority", "a driving force for economic and social progress and development" and "a body of creation" (SME Policy Council "1980s SMEs". "Vision", "90s SME Vision"). The Basic Law for Small and Medium Enterprises (New Basic Law), which was drastically revised in 1999, also stands on the same view of small and medium enterprises.

Necessity of Synthetic Theory of SMEs

I think that the Problem-type and Promising-type SME Theory both has some correct aspects, but it is a partial theory that captures only one aspect of SMEs. For example, the Problem-type SME Theory cannot explain the fact that SMEs after the high-growth period became the driving force of international competitiveness due to innovation. Promising-type SME Theory emphasizes the development potential of SMEs and neglects the problems that SMEs have, and cannot explain the difficulty of SME management since the 1990s. I said, "SMEs have inherent development potential that large enterprises do not have, but they also have inherent problems that hinder their manifestation. Therefore, SMEs become a unified product of development potential and problems. Both development and problems should be theoretically included as constituting the essence of SMEs together, and "consolidated understanding" should be made. I call it by myself a Synthetic Theory of SMEs because I can see both at the same time. In fact, the source of this theory is the Doyukai (The National Conference of the Association of Small Business Entrepreneurs). Members of the Doyukai are confident in the development and role of SMEs, recognize the problems that SMEs have, and strive to realize a good business environment. The Synthetic Theory of SMEs is an idea learned from this attitude of the Doyukai.

【2】競争の根幹は情報発見競争

2021年2月 黒瀬直宏


前回、「中小企業は大企業にない固有の発展性を内在させているが、その発現を妨げる固有の問題性も課せられている。そのため、中小企業は発展性と問題性の統一物になる」と述べました。今回からその説明に入ります。

市場競争とは何か

「中小企業とは何か」を考えるには、「市場競争とは何か」にまで遡る必要があります。企業同士は色々の点で競争していますが、根幹となるのは情報発見競争です。

市場は社会の分業で生産された商品の供給と需要が出会う場ですが、分業は自然発生的ですから、昨日までの需要が今日は他の製品で満たされているかもしれません。需要はあっても昨日までつけられていた価格が新技術の出現で今日は受け入れられないかもしれません。供給者が社会的に妥当と考えた価格で貨幣を差し出す需要者を見つけることが販売ですが、それは成功するとは限りません。商品は売れなくては商品ではないが売れるとは限らず、販売は「商品の命がけの飛躍」(マルクス)なのです。

企業は販売の不確実性を低下させるため、需要と技術に関する情報の発見に向かい、その情報に従って資本は投下されます。情報発見活動は1回限りの過程ではなく、情報発見は新たな製品や技術となって市場を変化させ、それが他企業の情報を不完全化し、情報発見活動をまた引き起す――という相互強制過程として永続し、企業の経営活動の起点であり続けます。ですから、情報発見活動こそが市場競争の根幹です。ハイエクという経済学者は、競争を競争なしには誰にも知られないような事実を発見する過程としましたが、競争の本質を適確に表現しています。

場面情報が重要

 企業の情報発見活動の中心は、経営活動中の出来事に基づく「その場その場で発生する情報」(場面情報)の獲得です。そうならざるをえないだけでなく、場面情報が販売の不確実性を減らすのに一番役立つからです。顧客の一言や行動から新たな需要に気づき、思いがけぬ製作の失敗から新たな加工法を思いつくというのが場面情報の例です。ある金属成形企業では金型の段取りを失敗し、奇妙な形をした不良品ができてしまいました。社長はこれを見て、同じものを作るとしたら切削加工で何工程もかかるだろう。これはプレスのワンストロークでできた。意図的にプレスで複雑形状の部品を作ることができれば大幅なコストダウンになると、とっさに感じ取りました。不良品の背後にある新たな加工法の可能性を察知したのです。間違えた金型の段取りをシュミレーションし、何回も試作し、プレスのワンストロークで複雑形状の部品を作る技術を開発、大手の自動車部品企業との取引につなげました。

たまたま出現した不良品は断片的な事象の一つで、それ自体としては意味はありません。だが、単なる「断片」から感知した情報であるが故に、認識の飛躍による創造性があり、「新しいこと」を生み出します。このような、人の気づいていない新たな情報こそが販売の不確実性を減らすのに最も有効です。新聞からの情報は書いた人はすでに知っているし、読む人は皆知ります。だから、新聞にはやってはいけないことが書いてあると言った経営者がいました。ただ、場面情報はノーベル賞級の発見も生みますが、経営にとっては新しければ何でもよいわけではなく、社会のトレンドに沿っていないと販売は不確実となります。社会で形成される需要や技術の基本トレンドの周辺で「新しいこと」につながる場面情報の発見が情報発見競争の中心です。

場面情報発見活動は企業家活動

企業家活動とは「新しいこと」を行うことです。「新しいこと」は場面情報から得られるから、場面情報発見活動は企業家活動と言い換えてもかまいません。市場競争とは企業家活動による競争なのです。企業家というとシュンペーターの「創造的破壊」が思い浮かびますが、企業家活動はそのような英雄的行為ではなく、基本トレンドの周辺で行われる「新しいこと」、その意味で人と少し違うことを行うことが企業家活動であり、市場競争の実相です。そして、中小企業はこの企業家活動に関しては大企業にない有利性を持っているのです(次回のテーマです)。

(2) The Basis of Competition is the Competition to discover Information

KUROSE Naohiro, February 2021

In the previous Chapter, I mentioned that "SMEs have inherent development potential that large enterprises do not have, but they also have inherent problems that hinder their manifestation. Therefore, SMEs become a unified product of development potential and problems." Now, I will start the explanation.

What is market competition?

To think about "what is SME", we need to go back to "what is market competition" Companies are competing in many ways, but the basis is the competition to discover information.

The market is where the supply and demand of products produced by the division of labor of society meet, but since the division of labor is spontaneous, the demand up to yesterday may be met by other products today. Even if there is demand, the price that was set until yesterday may not be accepted today due to the advent of new technology. Finding a consumer who offers money at a price that the supplier considers socially reasonable is a sale, but it is not always successful. A product is not a commodity if it cannot be sold, and it is not always sold, as sales are a "salto mortale" or "fatal leapt" (Marx).

To reduce sales uncertainty, companies go to discover information about demand and technology, and capital is invested accordingly. Information discovery activity is not a one-time process, but information discovery becomes a new product or technology and changes the market, which incompletes the information of other companies and triggers information discovery activity again. In this way, it perpetuates as a process of mutual coercion and continues to be the starting point of corporate management activities. Therefore, information discovery activities are the basis of market competition. Hayek, an economist, defined competition as the process of discovering facts that no one would know without competition, and it does accurately represent the essence of competition.


Spot Information is important

The core of a company's information discovery activities is the acquisition of "information that occurs on the spot" (spot information) based on events during management activities. Not only is this inevitable, but spot information is most helpful in reducing sales uncertainty. An example of spot information is to notice new demand from a customer's words and actions, and to come up with a new processing method from an unexpected production failure. A metal molding company failed to set up a mold, resulting in a strangely shaped defective product. The president saw this and thought that it would take many steps to cut the same thing. But this was done with one stroke of the press. He quickly realized that if he could intentionally press to make parts with complex shapes, it would save a lot of money. He realized the potential for new processing methods behind defective products. He simulated the wrong mold setup, prototyped it many times, and developed a technology to make parts with complicated shapes with one stroke of the press, which led to a deal with a major automobile parts company.

A defective product that happens to appear is one of the fragmentary events and has no meaning in itself. However, because it is information sensed from a mere "fragment", there is creativity due to a leap of recognition, and it creates "new things". This kind of new information that people are unaware of is the most effective way to reduce sales uncertainty. The information from the newspaper is already known to the person who wrote it, and everyone who reads it knows it. So, one business owner said that the newspaper writes something you shouldn't do. However, spot information can produce discoveries at a level worthy of the Nobel Prize, but for management, it doesn't matter if it's new. Sales are uncertain if it is not in line with social trends. The center of the information discovery competition is the discovery of spot information that leads to "new things" around the basic trends of demand and technology formed in society.


Spot information discovery activity is an activity for entrepreneurs

The activity of an entrepreneur is to do "new things". Since "new things" can be obtained from spot information, spot information discovery activities can be rephrased as entrepreneurial activities. Market competition is competition through entrepreneurial activities. When you think of an entrepreneur, Schumpeter's "creative destruction" comes to mind, but entrepreneurial activity is not such a heroic act, but a "new thing" that takes place around the basic trends, and in that sense it is an entrepreneurial activity to do something a little different from others, and it is the reality of market competition. (This will be the topic of next Chapter.)


【3】中小企業に発展性をもたらすもの

2021年3月 黒瀬直宏

情報共有の必要性

前回、市場競争の根幹は場面情報を巡る情報発見活動(企業家活動)だと述べました。中小企業には資本力、規模の経済性、市場支配力などはありませんが、企業家活動には大企業にない有利性があり、これが、中小企業に固有の発展性をもたらします。その有利性とは中小企業では情報共有が容易なため、「その場その場」における出来事からの場面情報を感度よく察知できることです。なぜ、情報共有が重要かというと、情報の認識は個人の頭の中だけで行われるものではないからです。人は他人の頭にある情報を活用し単独では不可能な認識を行っています。情報発見活動の主体は個人ですが、それは個人を部分として含む、情報の共有ループで結ばれたシステムとして遂行されています。

企業内の情報共有ループ

 企業内の情報共有ループをモデル化すると、経営幹部の持つ上部情報(経営理念・戦略、経営実績など)を従業員が共有するためのマクロ・ミクロ・ループ、従業員の持つ下部情報(生産や営業の現場での出来事やそれから発生した場面情報)を経営幹部が共有するミクロ・マクロ・ループ、従業員同士が下部情報を共有するためのミクロ・ミクロ・ループがあります。この3ループ毎の情報共有の効果には立ち入りませんが、経営者はこれらの重要性を日々感じていると思います。

中小企業は規模が小さく、構成員同士が身体的に近接しているため、情報共有に最も有効なフェース・トゥ・フェースを情報媒体の核にできます。また、組織が単純だから部署間の見えない壁がなく、企業全体に関する共通の解釈基盤も形成されており、精神的にも近接しています。このため中小企業は企業内で太い情報共有ループを形成できます。

企業外との情報共有ループ

企業は外部との情報共有ループも必要です。主なものは需要情報を得られる顧客とのループ、企業内のメンバーでは不可能な異種の情報を得る他企業とのループです。中小企業は地域の顧客をメインとしているため身体的に近接し(フェース・トゥ・フェースを使える)、生産や販売システムが巨大化・客体化しておらず、人優位のシステムだから顧客の要望を柔軟に受け入れられる精神的近接性も備えています。また、規模の小さい中小企業は外部経済を得るため地域産業集団を形成し、他企業との間でも身体的、精神的に近接しています。こうして、中小企業は企業外とも太い情報共有ループを構築できます。

企業家活動に関する「中小規模の経済性」

規模の小さい中小企業は人との身体的、精神的「近接性」を特徴とし、情報共有には有利性があります。これが場面情報発見活動(企業家活動)を活発化させます。つまり、企業家活動には「中小規模の経済性」があり、これが中小企業に固有の発展性をもたらします。そして、中小企業はこの経済性を基盤に場面情報を蓄積します。「その場その場」で発生する場面情報は、本に書かれている情報などより専有度が高いため、その蓄積により情報参入障壁で囲まれた「独自市場」を構築し、価格形成力を獲得しつつ発展します。市場の種々の分野のうち、特に需要多様分野は企業家活動の重要度が高く、生産上の「規模の経済性」も発揮できないので、ここが中小企業発展の舞台となります。

「経済性」というと「規模の経済性」しか思い浮かべない人がいますが(本連載第1回でふれたD.アトキンソン氏のように)、それは「経済性」の一種でしかなく、企業家活動に関しては「中小規模の経済性」があり、中小企業に発展性をもたらすのです。

(3) What brings Development to SMEs

KUROSE Naohiro, March 2021

Need for information sharing

In my previous Chapter (2) , I mentioned that the basis of market competition is an information discovery activity (an activity for entrepreneurs) related to spot information. SMEs do not have the capital, economies of scale, or market power, but entrepreneurial activity has advantages that large companies do not have, which gives SMEs its own potential for development. The advantage is that SMEs can easily share information, so they can sensitively detect spot information from events on the spot. The reason why information sharing is important is that information recognition is not limited to the individual's mind. People utilize the information in the minds of others to recognize things that cannot be done by themselves. The subject of information discovery activities is the individual, but it is carried out as a system connected by an information sharing loop that includes the individual as a part.


Information sharing loop within a company

When modeling an information sharing loop within a company, there are a macro-micro loop for employees to share the Top information (management philosophy / strategy, management performance, etc.) held by business owners, a micro-macro loop for business owners to share
the Bottom information (events at production and sales sites and spot information that occur after that) held by employees, and a micro-micro loop for employees to share the Bottom information among themselves. I do not go into the effect of information sharing by every three loops, but I think business owners feel the importance every day.

Since SMEs are small and their members are physically close to each other, face-to-face can be the core of information media as the most effective for information sharing.

In addition, because the organization is simple, there are no invisible walls between departments, and a common interpretation base for the entire company is formed, and they are mentally close to each other. This allows SMEs to form a thick information sharing loop within the company.


Information sharing loop with outside the company

Company also needs an information sharing loop with outside the company.

The main ones are the loop with customers to obtain demand information, and the loops with other companies to obtain different kinds of information that cannot be obtained by members within the company. Since SMEs mainly have their customers in the area, they are physically close to each other (face-to-face can be used), the production and sales system is not huge or objectified, and it is a human-dominated system, they also have the mental proximity to flexibly accept customer needs.
In addition,
SMEs form a regional industrial group to gain an external economy and are physically and mentally close to other companies. In this way, SMEs can build a thick information sharing loop both outside the company.


"Small and medium-sized economics" related to entrepreneurial activities

Small SMEs are characterized by physical and mental "accessibility" with people, which is advantageous for information sharing. This activates Spot information discovery activities (entrepreneurial activities). In other words, entrepreneurial activity has "small and medium-sized economics", which brings about the unique development potential of SMEs. And SMEs accumulate Spot information based on this economic efficiency. Since the Spot information generated "on the spot" is more exclusive than the information written in books, it will build a "unique market" surrounded by information entry barriers by accumulating it, and will develop while gaining price formation power. Of the various fields in the market, entrepreneurial activities are particularly important in the fields of diverse demand, and the "economy of scale" in production cannot be demonstrated, so this is the stage for the development of SMEs.

Some people think of "economy" only as "economy of scale" (like Mr. D. Atkinson mentioned in Chapter (1) of this series), but it is only a kind of "economy". There is "small and medium-sized economy" when it comes to entrepreneurial activities, which brings development potential to SMEs.

【4】経営者能力の重要性

2021年3月 黒瀬直宏

前回、規模の小さい中小企業には情報共有の有利性があり、これが企業家活動(場面情報発見活動)を活発化させることを、企業家活動における「中小規模の経済性」と呼びました。しかし、この経済性は自動的に発揮されるのではなく、次のような経営者能力が必要です。

企業家的能力

中小企業では、経営者は企業家活動を行わないが企業は企業家活動を行うということは考えらず、経営者自身に企業家能力が必要です。経営者は自ら場面情報を発見するため、進んで生産や販売の現場に出なくてはなりません。また、現場での出来事を意味のある情報に変換するには、問題意識を磨いておかなくてはなりません。そのため、熱心に勉強し市場の基本トレンドなどの把握に努めねばなりません。そして、忘れてはならないのは、情報共有ループ構築能力も企業家的能力に含まれることです。企業家活動は「場面情報」発見活動を中枢としますが、情報発見活動は情報共有ループで結びつけられた共同体的活動として実施されないと効果的でなく、情報共有ループの構築も情報発見活動の一環をなすからです。

民主的な人間関係観

情報共有ループの構築は単なるテクニックでできるものではありません。情報共有を行うには民主的な人間関係観が必要です。情報の独占は所有権と並ぶ支配の源泉ですから、一般従業員による情報共有は、その地位を引き上げることになります。企業を家業と考え、従業員を使用人とみなすような経営者やそれを疑問と思わないような従業員からなる企業では実行できません。従業員は経営者と人格的に対等で、共通の目標を達成するためのパートナーです。このような考えを「経営パートナー主義」と呼びましょう。情報共有は「経営パートナー主義」を土台とします。これは、同友会会員にはお馴染みの考えのはずです。「中小企業における労使関係に関する見解」(1975年1月)で謳われていることですから。

戦略構築能力

一体的な企業家活動を行うには経営管理能力、特に経営理念・経営戦略を構築する能力も必要です。人々が共感を覚え、働く意欲を湧かせる経営理念、環境変化と自社の経営資源を勘案した、合理的で説得力のある経営戦略――これらがないと一体的な企業家活動はできません。

 経営学者のカッツは経営管理者の能力を次の3つに分けました。

 第1はテクニカル・スキル。特定分野の仕事の方法、進め方、技術などに関する理解や熟練のことです。

 第2はヒューマン・スキル。グループのメンバーとして効果的に働く能力、また、リーダーとしてチームに協調的行動を生み出す能力です。その中心は相手のニーズやモチベーションを嗅ぎ取り、自分の行動がどのような反応をもたらすかを判断できる感受性です。

 第3はコンセプチュアル・スキル。企業を全体として捉え、組織の種々の活動や利害を共通の目的に向け調整、統合する能力です。組織の各種機能の相互関係、企業と社会との関係を理解していなくてはなりません。

以上の中で戦略構築に必要なのが、コンセプチュアル・スキルです。私の考えではテクニカル・スキルは反復によってあるレベルには到達し、ヒューマン・スキルも生得的な差はありますが、人の中でもまれる中で身についていきます。だが、コンセプチュアル・スキルについては、日常業務から一歩離れた広い視野に基づく勉強とそれを続けられる知性が必要なため、このスキルに関しては経営者間で差がつき、戦略構築能力の優劣が目立ちます。各地同友会が経営指針作成の勉強会に力を入れているゆえんです。

企業家活動に関する中小規模の経済性は自然に発生するのではなく、以上の経営者能力・資質が必要です。

(4) Importance of Management Ability

KUROSE Naohiro, March 2021

In the previous Chapter (3), I pointed out that small SMEs have an advantage in sharing information, which activates entrepreneurial activities (Spot information discovery activities), and I called it as "small and medium-sized economics" in entrepreneurial activities. However, this economic efficiency is not automatically demonstrated, and the following management abilities are required.


Entrepreneurial ability

In SMEs, it is unlikely that the business owners are not engaged in entrepreneurial activities, but the enterprises are engaged in entrepreneurial activities, and the business owners themselves need to have entrepreneurial ability. The business owners must be willing to go to the production or sales site to discover the Spot information by themselves. In addition, in order to convert the events in the field into meaningful information, it is necessary for them to brush up their sense of awareness of the problem. Therefore, they must study hard and try to understand the basic trends of the market. And they shouldn't forget that the ability to build information sharing loops is also included in the entrepreneurial ability. Entrepreneurial activities are centered on "Spot information" discovery activities, but information discovery activities are not effective unless they are carried out as community activities linked by an information sharing loop, because, building an information sharing loop is also part of the information discovery activity.


Democratic view of human relationships

Building an information sharing loop is more than just a technique. To share information, we need a democratic view of human relationships. Information monopoly is a source of control along with ownership, so information sharing by ordinary employees raises its position. It cannot be done by a company consisting of a business owner who considers the company as his/her family business and employees as servants or employees who don't question it. Employees are personally equal to the business owner and partners to achieve common goals. Let's call this idea "management partnership". Information sharing is based on the "management partnership principle". This should be a familiar idea to Doyukai members. This is because it is stated in the "Opinions on Labor-Management Relations in SMEs" (January 1975).


Strategy building ability

In order to carry out integrated entrepreneurial activities, it is necessary to have business management ability, especially the ability to build a business philosophy and business strategy.

An integrated entrepreneurial activity cannot be achieved without a rational and persuasive management strategy that takes into consideration the management philosophy, environmental changes and the company's management resources that motivate people to sympathize and work.

Prof. Robert L. Katz, a business scholar, divided the abilities of business managers into the following three.

The first is technical skills, which mean understanding and proficiency in how to work in a particular field, how to proceed, techniques, and so on.

The second is human skills, which mean the ability to work effectively as a member of a group and to create collaborative behavior in the team as a leader. At its core is the sensitivity to sniff out the needs and motivations of the other person and determine how their actions will react.

The third is conceptual skills, which mean the ability to take the enterprise as a whole and coordinate and integrate the various activities and interests of the organization towards a common purpose. They must understand the interrelationships of various functions of an organization and the relationship between the company and society.

Of the above, what is needed to build a strategy is conceptual skills. In my opinion, technical skills can be reached to a certain level through repetition, and human skills, although have innate differences, can be acquired in the midst of human relations. However, conceptual skills require a broader perspective of study that is one step away from day-to-day work and the intellect to continue it, which makes differences between managers to clearly show the superiority or inferiority of strategy building ability. This is because the Doyukai in each region are focusing on study sessions for creating management guidelines. Small and medium-sized economies of scale related to entrepreneurial activities do not occur naturally, but require the above management abilities and qualities.

5情報共有の効果の実証

2021年4月 黒瀬直宏


 前回までに企業家活動(場面情報発見活動)には情報共有の有利性に基づく「中小規模の経済性」があるが、その発揮のためには経営者能力が重要なことを述べました。

 今回は、情報共有が経営に良い効果を及ぼしているエビデンスを示します。

経営計画の作成の仕方と情報共有密度

私は中小企業へのアンケート調査で、年間の経営計画について、次の3つのどれに当てはまるかを訊ねたことがあります。

 a.「年間の経営計画の作成に関し、一般従業員も参加する」、b.「年間の経営計画を経営幹部層だけで決めている」、c.「年間経営計画を決めるということは特にしていない」。

 aの例として私が思い出すのは、今期の経営の総括・翌期の計画は勿論、商社からメーカーへの転換、就業規則の作成など、経営の根幹に関する方針を全従業員参加の泊まり込み会議で決めている企業です。この場合、一般従業員も経営計画の作成に参加しているから、経営計画を自分自身のものとしてよく知っています。また、一般従業員の計画作成への参加を通じて、経営幹部も一般従業員の持つ情報を共有します。従業員同士のコミュニケーションも活発に行われるから、従業員間の情報共有の密度も高まります。

このように、一般従業員の経営計画作成への参加は、企業構成員間のコミュニケーションを格段に高めます。それに対し、経営計画を経営幹部だけで決めているbの情報共有の密度はaより低いでしょう。cは経営計画がなく共有のしようがなく、その他の情報についても受発信は低調と思われ、情報共有の程度は最も低いと見なせます。情報共有の密度はa>b>cです。

表は、a, b, cといくつかの項目を組み合わせています。まず、「従業員との情報共有」の欄を見ると、経営理念の一般従業員への浸透努力を行っている企業や販売高などの経営情報を公開する企業、つまり、一般従業員の経営計画作成への参加以外によっても情報共有を推進している企業の割合もa>b>cで、情報共有の密度がa>b>cということは間違いないでしょう。

高収益・高賃金企業の割合

そして、注目すべきは「経営実績」の欄で、「98~03年度売上伸び率20%以上」と「一人当たり平均年間給与総額400万円以上」の企業の割合もa>b>cで、情報共有密度が高いほど優れた経営実績=高収益・高賃金の企業が多くなっています。

 また、「自社の強み」として他社にない加工技術、製品開発力、販売力という要因を挙げる企業割合についても同じことが言えます。これらは、技術や需要に関する情報発見活動が活発であることを示唆し、高収益・高賃金の原動力になっています。中小企業が産業発展の主役とする、中小企業に「誇り」を持っている企業割合もa>b>cです。

 このように、a, b, cの順で経営パフォーマンスが良いですが、企業規模を見ると、cは1~19人の企業が多く、cのパフォーマンスの低さは小規模性にも由来している可能性がありますが、その場合でも人手がないので経営計画をたてる余裕がないという、情報共有に関わる要因が重要だと思います。aとbについては規模構成は同じということが確かめられています。したがって、情報共有密度の濃いほど経営パフォーマンスが良いと言えます。情報共有に基づく共同体的企業家活動の効果を示すものです。

(5) Demonstration of the Effect of Information Sharing

KUROSE Naohiro, April 2021

By the last Chapters, I mentioned that entrepreneurial activities (spot information discovery activities) have "small and medium-sized economics" based on the advantage of information sharing, but in order to demonstrate them, managers ability is important.

This time, I will show evidence that information sharing has a positive effect on management.

Management plan creation method and Density of information sharing

In a questionnaire survey of SMEs, I once asked which of the following three applies when creating an annual business plan.

a. "General employees participate in the creation of the annual management plan", b. "The annual management plan is decided only by the executives", c. "We do not specifically decide the annual management plan"

As an example of "a", I remember a company where all employees participate to decide the plan at a stay-in meeting, starting from the summary of management for this term and the plan for the next term, formulate policies related to the foundation of management, such as conversion from a trading company to a manufacturer and creation of work rules, etc. In this case, general employees also participate in the creation of the business plan, so they are familiar with the business plan as their own. In addition, executives will share the information held by regular employees through their participation in planning. Since communication between employees is also active, the density of information sharing among employees will increase.

In this way, the participation of general employees in the creation of business plans greatly enhances communication among corporate members. On the other hand, the density of information sharing in "b", where the management plan is decided only by the executives, will be lower than in "a". "c" has no management plan and cannot be shared, and it seems that the sending and receiving of other information is sluggish, and the degree of information sharing can be considered to be the lowest. The density of information sharing is a> b> c.

The table combines "a", "b"," c" and some items.

First, if you look at the "Information sharing with employees" column, companies that are making efforts to spread the management philosophy to general employees and companies that disclose management information such as sales, in other words, the percentage of companies that promote information sharing other than the participation of general employees in creating management plans is also a> b> c. There is no doubt that the density of information sharing is a> b> c.

Percentage of high-profit, high-wage companies

And what you should pay attention to is the "Management Performance" column. The ratio of companies with "sales growth rate of 20% or more in 1998-2003" and "average annual salary per person of 4 million yen or more" is also a> b> c, and the higher the information sharing density, the more companies with excellent management performance = high profit and high wage.

The same can be said for the percentage of companies that cite factors such as processing technology, product development capabilities, and sales capabilities that other companies do not have as their "company strengths." These suggest that information discovery activities related to technology and demand are active, and are the driving force for high profits and high wages. The percentage of companies that take pride in SMEs, where SMEs play a leading role in industrial development, is also a> b> c.

In this way, the management performance is good in the order of "a", "b", "c". Looking at the size of the company, there are many companies with 1 to 19 people in "c". The poor performance of "c" may also be due to its small size. Even in that case, there is no manpower and there is no room to make a management plan. Therefore, I think the factors related to information sharing are important. It has been confirmed that the scale composition is the same for "a" and "b". Therefore, it can be said that the higher the information sharing density, the better the management performance. All the above shows the effect of community entrepreneurial activities based on information sharing.

6大企業体制の形成

2021年5月 黒瀬直宏


中小企業の問題性の側面へ

前回までは中小企業が発展しうる根拠として企業家活動に関する「中小規模の経済性」について考えました。これは本連載初回で「a.中小企業は大企業にない固有の発展性を内在させているが、b.その発現を妨げる固有の問題性も課せられている。そのため、c.中小企業は発展性と問題性の統一物になる」という見方を示しましたが、このうちのaの根拠に関する説明です。今回からbの説明に入ります。

中小企業には固有の発展性があります。しかし、実際には中枢産業部門の少数大企業に経済力が集中している産業体制(以下、「大企業体制」)下に中小企業が置かれているため、多くが発展性の発揮を抑えられています。

大企業体制の形成

市場経済には同程度の規模の企業同士が競争する時代がありました。例えば、20世紀初頭のアメリカの自動車産業では自動車会社が69社もあり、多様な車を富裕層向けに作っていました。フォード社も当初は高級車を作っていましたが、1908年、農民向けの大衆車、モデルTを投入しました。農民の自動車へのニーズは「堅牢」「操作が容易」「余裕のある馬力」というもので、T型はこの潜在していた均質・大量のニーズに見事に適合しました。 「需要均質分野」が一旦拓かれると競争の中心は多様な需要への適合ではなく、規模の経済性の追求、つまり分割不可能な大規模設備による生産性の上昇になります。それが価格を引き下げ「販売の不確実性」を低下させるからです。フォード社は連続組み立て方式の導入により価格引下げに成功、他企業を市場から排除しました。

結果、1929年の中小メーカーのシェアは15.9%、35年に2.6%となり、中小企業は自動車産業から駆逐されました。

こうして自動車産業は高い市場集中度と参入障壁を築いた少数大企業が支配し、多くの産業の結節点で大量需要を擁する中枢産業部門となりました。アメリカでは20Cに入る頃からこのような中枢産業部門が次々に形成され大企業体制が生まれました(日本では第一次世界大戦後になります)。

中小企業への影響

では、中枢産業部門から排除された中小企業はどうなるのでしょうか。連載第2回で述べたように、中小企業は規模の経済性を発揮しにくいが企業家活動が重要な、需要多様分野を存立分野とすることになります。だが、その分野も大企業の強い影響下に置かれます。例えば次のとおりです。

中枢産業部門は産業連関を通じ、自動車のように多くの産業への需要起点になり、鉄鋼、半導体のように多くの産業への原料、部品の供給起点になります。『中小企業白書2007年版』は大企業が需要の起点になっているという視点から、東京商工リサーチが持つ製造業14万社(製造企業の約3割をカバー)のデータを分析したところ、全14万社中のわずか0.54%(773社)の上場企業からの需要に直接、間接に依存する企業が約6割(8万社)もあることがわかりました。このデータでは上場企業以外は殆ど中小企業です。この関係により、中小企業は少数大企業の生産計画・設備投資計画、購買政策(内外製の方針、購買量・購買価格の方針等)の強い影響を受けます。これはあくまで一例です。大企業の中小企業への影響をまとめてみます。

まず、経済の拡大やその方向は中枢産業部門の設備投資、技術革新に大きく左右されるため、大企業に需要を依存しない4割の企業を含む中小企業全体の経営環境が大企業によって形成されます。かつての高度成長、現在の経済停滞、かつての産業の重化学工業化、現在の産業のデジタル化をもたらしたのは中枢産業部門の大企業です。

次に、大企業の経営行動が取引・競争関係を通じ中小企業に影響を及ぼします。上記のような需要起点となっている大企業の影響はその一部です。次回は大企業の経営行動が取引・競争関係を通じて中小企業を圧迫する問題(以下、中小企業問題)を取り上げます。

(6) Formation of the Large Enterprise System

KUROSE Naohiro, May 2021

To the Aspects of SME Problems

Until the last Chapters, we considered "small and medium-size economy of scale characteristics" related to entrepreneurial activities as the basis for the development of SMEs.

In the first Chapter of this series, I said, "a. SMEs have inherent development potential that large enterprises do not have, but b. There are also inherent problems that prevent their manifestation, therefore, c. SMEs are a unified product of development potential and problems", and up to the last Chapters, I have explained the grounds for the “a” above. From now, I will start the explanation of “b”.

SMEs have their own potential for development. However, in reality, SMEs are located under an industrial system (hereinafter referred to as "large enterprise system") in which economic power is concentrated in a small number of large enterprises in the central industrial sector, and many SMEs are restrained from demonstrating development potential.

Formation of the Large Enterprise System

There was a time in the market economy where companies of similar size competed with each other.

For example, in the American automobile industry at the beginning of the 20th century, there were 69 automobile companies, making a variety of cars for the wealthy.

Ford also initially made luxury cars, but in 1908, it introduced the Model T, a popular car for farmers.

Farmers' needs for automobiles were "robust", "easy to operate", and "marginal horsepower", and the T type perfectly met this latent homogeneous and large amount of needs. Once the "homogeneous demand field" is cultivated, the focus of competition was not on adapting to diverse demands, but on the pursuit of economies of scale, that is, the increase in productivity due to indivisible large-scale equipment. It lowered prices and reduced "sales uncertainty."

Ford succeeded in reducing prices by introducing a continuous assembly method, and excluded other companies from the market.

As a result, the share of SMEs in 1929 was 15.9%, and in 1935 it was 2.6%, and SMEs were expelled from the automobile industry.

In this way, the automobile industry was dominated by a small number of large companies that built high market concentration and barriers to entry, and became a central industrial sector with large demand at the nodes of many industries. In the United States, such central industrial sectors were formed one after another from the time of entering 20C, and the large enterprise system was born (in Japan, after World War I).

Impact on SMEs

So, what about SMEs that have been excluded from the central industry sector? As mentioned in Chapter (2) of this series, SMEs found place in the field of diverse demand, where economies of scale were difficult to achieve but entrepreneurial activities were important. However, that field was also under the strong influence of large enterprises. For example:

Through input-output relationships, the central industrial sector became a starting point for demand for many industries such as automobiles, to serve as starting point for supplying raw materials and parts to many industries such as steel and semiconductors. The "White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprises 2007" , based on the perspective that large enterprises are the starting point for demand, analyzed the data from 140,000 manufacturing companies (covering about 30% of manufacturing companies) owned by Tokyo Shoko Research, and found that about 60% (80,000 companies) of the 140,000 companies directly or indirectly depend on the demand from listed companies, which is only 0.54% (773 companies). According to this data, most of the companies other than listed companies are SMEs. Due to this relationship, SMEs are strongly influenced by the production plans / capital investment plans and purchasing policies (domestic and external manufacturing policies, purchasing volume / purchasing price policies, etc.) of a small number of large enterprises. This is just an example. Let's summarize the impact of large companies on SMEs.

First, the expansion of the economy and its direction are greatly influenced by capital investment and technological innovation in the central industrial sector, and the business environment of the entire SME, including 40% of companies that do not depend on demand, is formed by large companies. It is the large companies in the central industry that brought about the high growth in the past, the current economic stagnation, the heavy chemical industrialization in the past industry, and the digitization of the current industry.

Next, the management behavior of large companies affects SMEs through business and competitive relationships. The impact of large companies, which are the starting points of demand as described above, is a part of this. Next time, I will write on the problem that the management behavior of large companies puts pressure on SMEs through transactions and competitive relationships (hereinafter referred to as the SME problem).

7収奪問題

2021年5月 黒瀬直宏

大企業の市場管理がもたらす中小企業問題

前回は大企業体制が中小企業問題を引き起こすと述べました。中小企業問題とは大企業の経営行動が取引・競争関係を通じて中小企業を圧迫する問題のことです。現在のように経済拡大が停滞しているときは、個々の大企業もその影響を受けますが、多くの場合中小企業の方が被害は大きいです。それは経済停滞と同時に、中小企業には固有の中小企業問題があるからです。中小企業問題の第一が収奪問題です。

連載第2回で述べたように商品生産者には「販売の不確実性」という宿命があります。そのため情報発見競争が引き起こされますが、大企業、中でも高い市場集中度と高い参入障壁を築いている巨大企業には情報発見以外にも「販売の不確実性」を低下させる手段があります。それは「販売の不確実性」をもたらす市場の変化を管理しようとすることです。

価格の管理

まず、大企業は販売を不確実にする基となる価格と需要の動きを管理しようとします。産業が少数大企業で占められると協調しやすくなり、最有力企業の価格設定に他の企業が追随し、多数企業が競争している場合より高い水準に市場価格を維持できます。利潤率も上がるためその産業に参入しようとする企業もでますが、既存大企業に伍する巨大設備投資が必要で、供給を一挙に増やすことになるので、期待利潤率は低くなります。これが障壁となって参入が阻止され、供給は増えず高い市場価格が維持されます。競争者が多数の場合は個々の企業は市場価格に関与できませんでしたが、今や市場価格は大企業の価格政策の強い影響下で決められ、生産性が上がっても価格はそれほど下がりません。

また、大企業は購入寡占(購入企業が限られていること)の力により、部品や資材などの購入価格も引き下げることができます。大企業による下請単価の引き下げが典型です。大企業はこれにより市場価格が低下したとしても高い利潤率を維持できます。

需要の管理

大企業は需要の動きも管理しようとします。大企業は価格では協調するので、販売促進の手段は差別化です。中小企業も場面情報に基づく差別化を行いますが、大企業は巨大な資本力による大量宣伝などで、他企業製品との差を誇張して伝え、幻想的な差別化で顧客を引き付けます。差別化は企業そのものにも及び、顧客は企業に忠誠的となり、商品選択の主体性を奪われます。経済学者のガルブレイスは、大企業は「消費者の自由裁量を企業にとって耐えうる限界内に押しとどめておく」と言いました。販売促進は大企業が設定した価格を消費者が受け入れるよう「説得」することですから、需要管理は価格管理の一環とも言えます。以上の需要管理は個人消費者を念頭におきましたが、どの生産も最終的には個人需要を満たすためのものですから、これは中間製品(部品など)の価格維持にもつながります。

収奪問題

大企業による市場(販売)価格の引上げ、購入価格の引下げは、大企業と取引する中小企業にとっては「原料高・製品安」の強制です。これにより、中小企業の下に本来とどまるはずの価値が奪われる「収奪問題」が生じます。なお、収奪は仕入価格が下がっても販売価格がそれ以上に下がると発生するので、「収奪問題」は中小企業のより大きな相対価格(販売価格/仕入価格)の低下によって発生すると言えます。

「収奪問題」は下請代金支払いの引き延ばし、親企業の収益計画達成のための「協力金」支払い要求、無償での多頻度・短納期要求、親企業の購買担当者が飲食した代金の付け回し、下請企業の設計図の無償使用など、価格関係以外を通じても発生しています。

-----------------------------------------------------------------

韓国社会に「カプチル」という言葉がある。優位な立場の「カプ」が弱者に不当な要求をすること。「サムソンに製造装置を納める際には、BOMまで提出するのが慣例だった」と韓国の半導体関連の装置メーカーの元営業担当者は声を潜めて明かした。BOMとは装置を構成する全部品リスト。BOMを渡した数か月後にサムソンの子会社がそっくりの装置を開発し、その値段を示され値下げを迫られたといった証言は少なくない(日本経済新聞2021年2月10日付)。“韓国よ、お前もか。”

(7) The Problem of Deprivation

KUROSE Naohiro, May 2021

SME Problems brought about by Market Management of Large Enterprises

Last time, I mentioned that the large enterprise system causes problems for SMEs. The SME problem is a problem in which the management behavior of a large enterprises puts pressure on the SME through business and competitive relationships. When economic expansion is stagnant as it is now, individual large enterprises are also affected, but SMEs are often more damaged. This is because, at the same time as the economic stagnation, SMEs have their own SME problems. The first problem for SMEs is the problem of deprivation.

As mentioned in Chapter (2) of this series, product producers have the destiny of "sales uncertainty." This causes information discovery competition, but large enterprises, especially those with high market concentration and high barriers to entry, have other ways to reduce "sales uncertainty" besides information discovery. It is to try managing the changes in the market that lead to "sales uncertainty".

Price management

First, large enterprises seek to control price and demand movements that underlie sales uncertainty. When the industry is dominated by a small number of large enterprises, it becomes easier to collaborate, other enterprises will follow the pricing of the leading enterprises, and the market price can be maintained at a higher level than when the large number of enterprises are competing. Some enterprises may try to enter the industry because the profit rate will increase, Expected profit rate will be low because it will require huge capital investment comparable to that of existing large enterprises and will increase supply at once. This acts as a barrier to prevent entry, increase supply and maintain high market prices.

Individual enterprises could not be involved in market prices when there were a large number of enterprises, but market prices are now set under the strong influence of the pricing policies of large enterprises, and even if productivity increases, prices do not decrease that much. In addition, large enterprises can reduce the purchase price of parts and materials by the power of oligopoly (the number of purchasing companies is limited). A typical example is a reduction in the unit price of subcontracting by a large enterprise This allows large enterprises to maintain a high rate of profit even if market prices fall.

Demand management

Large enterprises also try to control demand movements. Large enterprises collaborate on price, so the means of sales promotion is differentiation. SMEs also differentiate based on spot information, but large enterprises exaggerate the difference with other enterprises' products by mass advertising with huge capital power and attract customers with fantastic differentiation. Differentiation extends to the enterprise itself, and customers become loyal to the enterprise and lose the independence of product selection. Economist Galbraith said big enterprise "keep consumer discretion within the limits that enterprise can tolerate." Demand management can be said to be part of price management, as sales promotion is to "persuade" consumers to accept prices set by large enterprises. The above demand management has individual consumers in mind, but since all production is ultimately to meet individual demand, this also leads to price maintenance of intermediate products (parts, etc.).

The problem of deprivation

Raising the market (sales) price and lowering the purchase price by large enterprises is a coercion to SMEs that do business with large enterprises to "high raw materials and low products". This creates a "deprivation problem" that deprives SMEs of the value they should have stayed with. In addition, since deprivation occurs when the selling price drops further even if the purchase price drops, it can be said that the "deprivation problem" is caused by a larger decline of relative price (selling price / purchase price) of SMEs.

The "deprivation problem" also occurs through non-price relationships such as postponement of payment to subcontractors, request for "cooperation fee" payment to achieve the profit plan of the parent company, request for frequent and short delivery time free of charge, food and drink cost by the purchasing staff of the parent company, free use of design drawings of the subcontractor, etc.

---------------

There is a word "capuchil" in Korean society. The dominant "cap" makes unreasonable demands on the weak. "It was customary to submit a BOM when delivering manufacturing equipment to Samsung," said a former sales representative of a Korean semiconductor-related equipment manufacturer. BOM is a list of all parts that make up the device. There are many testimonies that a subsidiary of Samsung developed a similar device a few months after handing over the BOM, and was shown the price and was forced to reduce the price (Nikkei, 1 February 2021). "Korea, you too?

8】経営資源問題

2021年6月 黒瀬直宏


今回は中小企業問題の続きとして、中小企業では資金と労働力が不足するという経営資源問題を取り上げます。

資金難

資金難はかつては中小企業問題を代表するものでした。前回述べたように中小企業は「原料高・製品安」により価値を奪われ、親企業による下請代金の支払い遅延、売上計画達成のための「協力金」の要求などによっても価値を吸い上げられる――こういう収奪問題により内部資金が不足します。

そのため中小企業は外部金融に頼ることになりますが、その中心は間接金融(銀行借入れ)です。かつては、融資集中機構といって都市銀行が日銀信用をバックに優先的に大企業に資金を融通する仕組みが形成され、中小企業は大企業の資金需要がない時に貸付けられる「限界的貸付先」とされていました。信用金庫の発展や大企業の直接金融(株式、社債発行)への移行により、金融機関の中小企業への融資割合は増加しましたが、借り入れが楽になったのは全体から見ると一部の優良中小企業でした。また、1990年以降でも優良中小企業を含め数度の借入難が起きました。1997年の金融システム危機では中小企業に対する貸し渋り、貸し剥がしが横行し、中小企業をパニックに陥れました。2007年と08年には世界金融危機で社債等の発行が困難になった大企業による銀行借り入れで、中小企業が締め出されることが起きました。

中小企業の資金難は戦後復興期~高度成長期に比べれば改善されていますが、日銀「短観」によると、中小企業の資金繰りDIは以上の内部資金の不足と借入難により91年以降の殆どの期間マイナスで(2014年以降プラスへ)、特に借入難の時期には資金難が悪化しました。

労働力不足

中小企業の労働力不足の要因の第1も収奪問題です。中小企業は不利な価格関係などにより価値を奪われるため賃金支払い能力が不足し、収奪をカバーしようと労働時間も長くなります。

近年、生産年齢人口の減少と共に中小企業の労働力不足が悪化し、コロナ禍の現在でも労働力不足を訴える中小企業が多く見られます。しかし、中小企業の労働力不足は人口動態に基づく自然現象ではありません。1990年代以降、収奪問題で賃金を上げられず(大企業との賃金格差拡大)、大企業に労働力を優先吸収されたことが原因です。中小企業庁「下請等中小企業の取引条件の改善に向けた調査」(2016年3月発表)では、取引単価の引き上げにより収益が改善した場合「従業員の賃金を引き上げる」と回答した企業は、71.6%に及びます。収奪問題が中小企業の賃金支払い能力を低めていることを物語っています。

第2の要因が大企業の強力な情報発信力です。大企業は販売促進活動を通じ企業情報を発信し続け、社会的知名度(ステータス)を高めています。子供のころから有名企業の名を刷り込まれてきた人には、有名企業に入社することが一流の人生と映ります。中小企業は賃金は劣っても、経営計画策定など中枢業務への参加、仕事の範囲や裁量の余地が大きい、一人ひとり配慮した働き方など、働き甲斐・働きやすさという「非経済的報酬」では大企業を上回る企業は多くあります。ですが、情報発信力がないためこの魅力を伝えられず、人材吸引力が弱くなります。

こうして引き起される中小企業の労働力不足には、仕事量に見合った従業員を確保できないという量的不足と中核労働者の不足という質的不足があります。中核労働者とは、変化への柔軟な対応能力を持つ若年労働者、熟練技能・技術開発・マーケティング能力を持つ専門人材、マネジメント能力を持つ管理人材、そして企業存続に必要な経営後継者などです。中小企業においても量的不足は経済の停滞期には緩和しますが、質的不足は緩和せず、慢性的な問題となっています。特に近年は経営後継者難の深刻化で廃業が増え、中小企業の人材難は中小企業の廃業問題へ発展してしまいました。

このように大企業に経営資源を優先吸収され、中小企業が経営資源不足に陥るのが経営資源問題で、これは収奪問題が中小企業の生産した価値を奪うのに対し、中小企業の価値の生産能力を抑制するものと言えます。

(8) The Problem of Management Resources

KUROSE Naohiro, June 2021

This time, as another issue of SMEs, let me take up the issue of management resources, namely the shortage of funds and labor in SMEs.

Financial difficulties

Financial difficulties were once representative of the SME problem. As I mentioned in the previous Chapter, SMEs are deprived of their value due to "high raw material prices and low product prices". The value was also absorbed by the delay in payment of the subcontract price by the parent company and the request for "cooperation money" to achieve the sales plan. Due to these deprivation problems, internal funds were insufficient. 

Therefore, SMEs relied on external financing, mainly indirect finance (bank borrowing). In the past, a loan concentration mechanism was formed in which city banks preferentially lend funds to large corporations backed by the credit of the Bank of Japan, and SMEs were considered "marginal lenders" to lend when there was no demand for funds from large companies. Due to the development of credit unions and the shift to direct finance (stocks, corporate bond issuance) of large corporations, the ratio of loans to SMEs of financial institutions increased, however, borrowing became easier only for some of the best SMEs overall.

In addition, even after 1990, there were several borrowing difficulties, including those of excellent SMEs.

In the financial system crisis of 1997, financial institutions were reluctant to provide new loans to SMEs, or they tried to withdraw existing loans, causing SMEs to panic. In 2007 and 2008, SMEs were locked out due to bank borrowing by large corporations that had difficulty issuing corporate bonds caused by the global financial crisis.

The financial difficulties of SMEs have improved compared to the postwar reconstruction period to the high growth period. According to the Bank of Japan's Tankan, the cash flow DI of SMEs had been negative for most of the period since 1991 (to positive after 2014) due to the above shortage of internal funds and difficulty in borrowing, and financial difficulties worsened, especially during periods of difficult borrowing.

Labor shortage

The first cause of labor shortages in SMEs is the problem of deprivation. SMEs are deprived of value due to unfavorable price relationships, so they lack the ability to pay wages and work longer hours to cover the deprivation.

In recent years, the labor shortage of SMEs has worsened as the working-age population has declined, and many SMEs still complain of labor shortages even today.

However, the labor shortage of SMEs is not a natural phenomenon based on vital statistics.

Since the 1990s, wages have not been raised due to the problem of deprivation (the wage gap with large companies has widened), and the labor force has been preferentially absorbed by large companies.

According to the Small and Medium Business Administration "Survey for Improving Transaction Conditions of SMEs such as Subcontractors" (announced in March 2016), companies that answered that they would "raise employee wages" if profits improved due to an increase in transaction unit prices , 71.6%.

It shows that the problem of deprivation is reducing the ability of SMEs to pay wages.

The second factor is the strong information dissemination ability of large companies.

Large companies continue to disseminate corporate information through sales promotion activities and raise their social recognition (status).

For those who have been imprinted with the name of a well-known company since childhood, joining a well-known company seems to be a first-class life.

Even if SMEs are inferior in wages, they can participate in core business such as business planning, have a lot of room for discretion and scope of work, and work styles that give consideration to each individual. There are many companies that outperform large companies.

However, because they do not have the ability to disseminate information, they cannot convey this appeal, and their ability to attract human resources weakens.

The labor shortages of SMEs caused in this way include the quantitative shortage of not being able to secure employees commensurate with the amount of work and the qualitative shortage the shortage of core workers.

Core workers are young workers who have the ability to respond flexibly to change, specialized personnel who have skills and abilities for technological development, and marketing, management personnel who have management ability, and management successors necessary for the survival of the company. ..

Even in SMEs, quantitative shortages are alleviated during economic stagnation, but qualitative shortages are not improved and have become a chronic problem.

Especially in recent years, the number of business closures has increased due to the serious difficulty of successors to management, and the difficulty of human resources of SMEs has developed into the problem of business closure of SMEs.

The problem of management resources is that large companies preferentially absorb management resources and SMEs run out of management resources.

It can be said that the problem of deprivation deprives SMEs of the value produced by them, while suppressing the capacity of SMEs to produce value.

9市場問題

2021年6月 黒瀬直宏


前2回では、大企業の経営行動が取引・競争関係を通じて中小企業を圧迫する問題(中小企業問題)として収奪問題、経営資源問題を取り上げました。今回は大企業の経営行動が中小企業の市場を縮小する市場問題について述べます。

大企業の市場多角化への強い動機

大企業は既存市場での設備投資には慎重です。市場が少数の大企業で占められていると1社の設備投資による供給増加が、他の大企業のシェアの減少に直ちに結びつくため、激しい価格競争に陥る危険があるからです。

そのため大企業は利潤拡大のためにはまだ大企業が存在しない他分野へ進出する強い動機を持ちます。これは同時に商品生産者の宿命である「販売の不確実性」を低下させる手段でもあります。事業が一市場分野に限られるならば、本連載第7回で述べたように価格・需要を管理しても、製品ライフサイクルやその製品特有の景気循環の影響を脱することはできません。だが、市場を多角化すれば、各市場の販売変動は相殺され、「販売の不確実性」は低下するからです。

製品多角化

 市場多角化には製品多角化と地理的多角化があります。

大企業は製品多角化の一環として、大企業が存在していない中小企業分野へ進出し、大量生産による低価格で中小企業から市場を奪うことがあります。特に、経済が停滞しているときは、例えば以前は100億円以上の市場にしか関心のなかった大企業が10億円程度の中小企業の市場に入り込んで来るというようなことが見られます。このため、法律によって大企業の中小企業市場への無制限の進出を防ぐ政策がとられたこともありました。大企業が需要減少に見舞われた際、中小企業への外注比率を引き下げる内製化も、中小企業市場への進出の一種と見ることもできます。

また、競争相手のいない全くの新産業部門にいち早く進出し、市場を独占しようと大規模投資を行うこともあります。それとともに新産業の上流や下流に中小企業向けの市場を創り出しますが、新産業と交代するように衰退する旧産業に関連する中小企業の市場は縮小します。

地理的多角化

地理的多角化も国内での大企業間の価格競争避け、拡大する海外市場への進出で利潤の獲得と「販売の不確実性」を低める手段となります。海外進出は輸出市場への進出から始まり、輸入代替政策をとる発展途上国政府や自国大企業を守ろうとする先進国政府の輸入制限措置と衝突すると、海外直接進出へ移ります。

大企業の輸出増加により為替レートが上昇すると輸出中小企業の国際競争力が低下し、低賃金を武器とする発展途上国製品に海外市場を奪われ、さらに国内市場にまで進出を許すことになります。日本では1970年代以降に繊維産業や雑貨産業でこの動きが進みました。

地理的多角化が海外直接進出へ進むと、初期には大企業が海外で使用する部品市場が中小企業向けに拡大します。だが、部品企業の現地進出やローカル企業の発展で部品の現地調達が進むと国内に向けられていた発注が海外へ流出し、さらに国内生産にも海外から部品が輸入され、国内中小企業の市場は縮小します。これは1990年代以降、大企業の「生産の東アジア化」によって大規模に起きました。

勿論、中小企業は市場縮小を座して見ているわけではなく、それに対抗すべく新市場開拓や事業転換の努力をしますが、前回述べた経営資源問題(資金や人材の不足)がその足を引っ張ります。

以上のように大企業の行動により、中小企業の市場が縮小するのが市場問題です。収奪問題が中小企業の生産した価値を奪い、経営資源問題が価値生産能力を奪うのに対し、市場問題は生産する商品の価値の実現機会を奪うものと言えます。

(9) The Problem of Markets

KUROSE Naohiro, June 2021

In the previous two Chapters, I took up the issues of deprivation and management resources caused by the behavior of large companies putting pressure on SMEs through transactions and competitive relationships (SME Problem). This time, I will talk about the market problem that the management behavior of large companies shrinks the market of SMEs.

Strong motivation for large companies to diversify their markets

Large companies are cautious about capital investment in existing markets.

If the market is occupied by a small number of large companies, the increase in supply due to capital investment by one company will immediately lead to a decrease in the share of other large companies, and there is a risk of fierce price competition.

Therefore, large companies have a strong motivation to expand into other fields where large companies do not yet exist in order to increase profits. At the same time, this is also a means of reducing the “sales uncertainty” that is the fate of product producers.

If a business is limited to one market area, managing prices and demand as described in Chapter (7) of this series will not eliminate the effects of the product life cycle and the business cycle specific to that product. However, diversifying the markets offsets sales fluctuations in each market and reduces "sales uncertainty."


Diversification of Products

Market diversification includes product diversification and geographical diversification.

As part of product diversification, large companies may enter the SME field where large companies do not exist and steal the market from SMEs at low prices due to mass production. Especially when the economy is stagnant, for example, large companies that were previously only interested in the market of 10 billion yen or more enter the market of SMEs of about 1 billion yen. For this reason, in some cases, policies were taken to prevent unlimited entry of large companies into the SME market by law. In-house production, which reduces the ratio of outsourcing to SMEs when large companies are hit by a decline in demand, can also be seen as a type of entry into the SME market.

Large companies may also enter a completely new industry sector with no competitors and make large investments to monopolize the market. At the same time, it will create a market for SMEs upstream and downstream of the new industry, but the market for SMEs related to the declining old industry will be replaced by the new industry, and the market for SMEs will shrink.

Geographical diversification

Geographical diversification will also serve for large companies to avoid price competition in domestic market, by entering the expanding overseas market to earn profits and reduce "sales uncertainty."

The overseas expansion of large companies begins with the expansion into the export market, and when conflicting with the import restriction measures of the governments of developing countries that adopt import substitution policies and the governments of developed countries that try to protect large corporations in their own countries, they will move on to direct expansion to overseas.

When the exchange rate rises due to the increase in exports of large companies, the international competitiveness of exporting SMEs declines, and products from developing countries that use low wages as weapons deprive overseas markets, furthermore, it will allow them to enter the domestic market. In Japan, this movement has progressed in the textile and general merchandise industries since the 1970s.

When geographical diversification progresses to direct expansion to overseas, initially, the parts market used by large companies overseas will expand to SMEs.

However, if the local procurement of parts progresses due to the local expansion of parts companies and the development of local companies, orders that had been directed to Japan flowed overseas, and parts were also imported from overseas for domestic production and the domestic SME market shrink.

This has happened on a large scale since the 1990s due to the "Production in East Asia" of large companies.

Of course, SMEs are not just looking at the shrinking market.

They are making efforts to develop new markets and transform their business to counter the situation, however, the management resource problem (lack of funds and human resources) mentioned in the last Chapter is dragging the efforts.

As mentioned above, the market problem means the shrinking market of SMEs due to the actions of large enterprises.

It can be said that the problem of deprivation deprives SMEs of the value they produce, and the problem of management resources deprives them of the ability to produce value, while market problems deprive them of the opportunity to realize the value of the products they produce.

10中小企業は発展性と問題性の統一物

2021年7月 黒瀬直宏

中小企業の発展性

ここで、今までの連載を振り返ります。連載第2回で、商品生産者には「販売の不確実性」という宿命があり、それを減らす鍵は「その場その場」で発生する専有度の高い「場面情報」の獲得だと述べました。そして、企業家活動とは「新しいこと」を行うことで、「新しいこと」は場面情報から得られるから、場面情報発見活動は企業家活動と言い換えられるとしました。

第3回では、企業家活動には情報共有の有利性に基づく「中小規模の経済性」があり、これにより中小企業は大企業が発見できない場面情報を発見・蓄積し、情報参入障壁で囲まれた「独自市場」を構築すると述べました。情報参入障壁とはその市場で必要な専門的な技術情報などがないことが壁になって参入できないことです。

「独自市場」では過当競争から免れられるため価格形成力がつきます。中小企業はこうして規模の経済性は効かないが企業家活動の重要度の高い需要多様分野で発展します。

中小企業の問題性

一方、大企業体制の下にある中小企業は収奪問題、経営資源問題、市場問題という中小企業問題を課せられていると指摘しました(連載7,8,9回)。中枢産業部門を占める大企業は「販売の不確実性」を低下させるため、市場を管理しようとします。その第一が、価格・需要の管理で、これにより中小企業に「原料高・製品安」を押し付けるなどの収奪問題を引き起こします。この収奪問題による大企業の豊富な資金や大銀行との密接な関係が大企業に資金を集中し、また、豊富な賃金原資や知名度が大企業に労働力を引き付けます。これが中小企業に資金・労働力不足という経営資源問題を引き起こします。大企業の製品的・地理的市場多角化(これも「販売の不確実性」を減らす効果があります)が中小企業市場への進出や国内中小企業への発注引き上げなどで中小企業市場を縮小する市場問題を引き起こすことがあります。こういう大企業の行動に起因する3つの中小企業問題が束になって中小企業の発展を抑制します。


中小企業は発展性と問題性の統一物

本連載初回で「a.中小企業は大企業にない固有の発展性を内在させているが、b.その発現を妨げる固有の問題性も課せられている。そのため、c.中小企業は発展性と問題性の統一物になる」という見方を示しましたが、以上は、a,bについての説明です。これからcを説明します。

重要なことは、大企業の市場管理行動は中小企業の発展を抑制するが企業家活動そのものを廃絶することはないことです。大企業が発展しても、企業家活動の舞台である「需要多様分野」は消滅しません。大量生産技術の発展で消滅した「需要多様分野」もありましたが、所得の上昇と共にたえず新生しています。むしろ、現代では「需要多様分野」は以前より拡大しています。

「需要多様分野」の存在は企業家活動の客体的条件と言えますが、主体的条件も廃絶されることはありません。大企業体制が形成されても、企業家活動に関する中小企業固有の有利性、すなわち、「場面情報」発見活動における「中小規模の経済性」は何ら変化しません。

また、この有利性を発揮するのに必要な能力を持つ中小企業経営者も必ず生み出されます。このため大企業の市場管理行動は中小企業問題を発生させますが、企業家活動そのものを廃絶することはできません。その結果、中小企業は企業家活動の有利性という内生要因による発展作用と中小企業問題という外生要因による抑制作用を同時に受けます。中小企業は相対抗する作用により二重に制御され、「発展性と問題性の統一物」となるのです。

連載第1回で紹介した問題型、積極型中小企業論は中小企業の一面だけを見ている部分理論という意味がこれでお分かりと思います。発展性と問題性を共に中小企業の本質として「統一理解」する複眼的中小企業論が中小企業に対する正しい見方なのです。

(10) SMEs are a unified product of development potential and problems

KUROSE Naohiro, July 2021

Development potential of SME

Here, let me look back on the series so far. In the Chapter (2) of this series,

Producers of goods have a destiny of "sales uncertainty," and I explained that the key to reducing this is the acquisition of highly proprietary "spot information" that occurs "on the spot." I also said that entrepreneurial activities can be paraphrased as entrepreneurial activities because "new things" can be obtained from spot information by doing "new things".

In the Chapter (3), I said that entrepreneurial activities have "small and medium-sized economics" based on the advantage of information sharing, which allows small and medium-sized enterprises to discover and accumulate spot information that large enterprises cannot find, and would build an "unique market" surrounded by information entry barriers. The barrier to entry of information means the lack of specialized technical information required in the market serves as a barrier to enter the market.

In the "unique market", they can avoid excessive competition, which gives them the ability to decide prices. SMEs thus develop in a variety of demand areas where economies of scale are ineffective but entrepreneurial activity is important.

Problems of SMEs

On the other hand, I pointed out that SMEs under the large enterprise system are subject to SME problems such as deprivation problems, management resource problems, and market problems (Chapters 7, 8 and 9). Large enterprises in the core industry sector try to control the market to reduce "sales uncertainty". The first is the management of prices and demand, which causes problems such as imposing "high raw materials and low prices" on SMEs. The abundant funds of large enterprises and their close relationship with large banks due to this deprivation problem concentrate the funds on large enterprises, and the abundant wage resources and name recognition attract the labor force to large enterprises. This causes SMEs to have a management resource problem of lack of funds and labor. Product and geographical market diversification of large enterprises (which also has the effect of reducing "sales uncertainty") will shrink the SME market by entering the SME market and raising orders to domestic SMEs. It can cause market problems. The three problems on SMEs caused by the behavior of these large enterprises bundled together curb the development of SMEs.


SMEs are a unified product of development potential and problems

In the Chapter (1) of this series, I showed my view that

"a. SMEs have inherent development potential that large enterprises do not have, but b. There are also inherent problems that hinder their manifestation. Therefore, c. SMEs will be a unified product of development potential and problems." The above is the explanation of a and b. From now on, I will explain c.

It is important to note that, the market management behavior of large enterprises restrains the development of SMEs, but does not abolish entrepreneurial activity itself. Even if large enterprises develop, the “diversified demand field” that is the stage of entrepreneurial activities will not disappear. There were some "diversified demand fields" that disappeared due to the development of mass production technology, but they are constantly renewing as income rises. Rather, in modern times, the “diversified demand fields” are expanding more than before.

The existence of "diversified demand fields" can be said to be an objective condition for entrepreneurial activities, but the subjective condition is not abolished either. Even if a large enterprise system is formed, the advantages particular to SMEs regarding entrepreneurial activities, that is, the "economy of small and medium-size" in "spot information" discovery activities, will not change at all.

It will also create small business owners with the abilities needed to take this advantage. For this reason, market management behavior of large enterprises causes problems for SMEs, but entrepreneurial activities themselves cannot be abolished. As a result, SMEs are simultaneously affected by the developmental effect of endogenous factors such as the advantage of entrepreneurial activities and the suppression effect of exogenous factors such as the SME problem.

SMEs are doubly controlled by their opposing actions and become a "unified product of development potential and problems".

You can now understand that the problem-type and aggressive-type SME theory introduced in Chapter (1) of this series is a partial theory that looks at only one side of SMEs. The Synthetic Theory of SMEs, which "unifies and understands" both development potential and problems as the essence of SMEs, is the correct view for SMEs.

【11「企業家的中小企業」(その1)

2021年8月 黒瀬直宏


3タイプへの分化

本では、中小企業は企業家活動の有利性による発展作用と中小企業問題による抑制作用を同時に受け、「発展性と問題性の統一物」になるとしました。この中小企業の本質は中小企業の3タイプとして現れます。中小企業は競争を通じて、問題性を打ち破って発展性の十全の発揮に成功する「企業家的中小企業」、発展性と問題性を共に抱える「半企業家的中小企業」、問題性に押しつぶされ、発展性を消失させた「停滞中小企業」に分化するのです。

「企業家的中小企業」

このタイプは新しい事の源となる「場面情報」発見活動(企業家活動)を需要に関しても技術に関しても活発に展開し、中小企業問題の壁の突破に成功、情報参入障壁で囲まれた「独自市場」構築により価格形成力を獲得しています。中小企業問題が存在しながら、どのようにしてこういう中小企業が現れるのか、次の3つの壁の突破が必要です。

第1の壁:需要情報発見活動の困難

中小企業は販売を確実にするには需要と技術に関する「場面情報」の発見が必要ですが、このうち需要情報の獲得には技術情報獲得に比べ固有の困難があります。

技術情報は生産目的に合わせ自分にとって必要なものを選べばよいですが、需要情報は他人の必要性に関する情報のため、技術情報のように探索範囲を限定できません。また、それは他人の発言や行動から察知することになりますが、他人の思いを正確にくみ取るのは容易ではありません。これらのため、確度の高い需要情報の発見には困難がつきまといます。

見込み違いの需要に基づく経営は破たんにつながります。このリスクを避け、大企業の外注に販売を依存する企業も現れます。しかし、何気ない顧客の一言などからその奥に秘められている需要を感知するような「場面情報」発見能力は人から失われることはなく、それに関する中小規模の経済性も決してなくならず、技術と同時に需要面でも企業家活動を展開する中小企業は必ず現れます。

だが、需要情報を発見し、それに応じた商品を提供しても売れるとは限りません。大企業が強力な販売促進活動で人々の信用度を高めていることが、反射的に名を知られていない中小企業の信用度を落とすため、よいものを作っても売れないのです。

だが、これも突破できます。顧客の要求に誠実に応え、1人でも2人でもよいから顧客を味方につける。その顧客が口コミで潜在的な顧客に評判を伝えてくれる。特に評判に影響を与えるのが技術力です。顧客の様々な技術的な要求に嫌がることなく対応する。それが評判になり、他で断られた技術難度の高い仕事が持ちこまれる――という形で顧客の拡大と技術の向上が好循環を形成し、市場が拡大します。

第2の壁:大企業の参入

 市場が拡大したところで第2の壁が現れます。市場拡大に刺激された大企業の参入です。大企業は中小企業が特許を持っていてもそれに触れないように上手に類似製品を開発します。それを大量生産技術で低価格販売する大企業の戦略は、その知名度と相まって中小企業に大きな脅威です。しかし、大企業は企業全体としては豊富な経営資源を持っていますが、当該分野は大企業の一事業部門にすぎず、その事業に必要な経営資源に関しては専業の中小企業の方が豊富です。例えば、技術には経験の積み重ねで得られた部分があり、他企業にはブラックボックス化しているため大企業でもその技術情報を得るのは容易ではありません。結果、後発大企業の品質が劣り、撤退するというケースは珍しくありません。専門店が百貨店との競争で負けないように専業中小企業は多角化大手企業に勝利できます。

 以上のようにして2つの壁を突破し、情報参入障壁で囲まれた独自市場の構築に成功する中小企業が現れます。ここまでくれば一応「企業家的中小企業」の誕生と言えます。だが、まだ第3の壁が残っています。次回に述べます。

(11) "Entrepreneurial SMEs" (1)

KUROSE Naohiro, August 2021

Differentiation into 3 types

In the Chapter 10 of this series, I explained that SMEs will be a "unified product of development potential and problems" by simultaneously receiving the development effect of the advantage of entrepreneurial activities and the suppression effect of the SME problems. The essence of this SME appears as three types of SMEs. Through competition, SMEs are crushed by problems, such as "Entrepreneurial SMEs" that overcome problems and succeed in demonstrating full potential, "Semi-entrepreneurial SMEs" that have both development potential and problems. Then, it differentiates into a "Stagnant SMEs" that has lost its development potential.

"Entrepreneurial SMEs"

This type actively develops "spot information" discovery activities (entrepreneurial activities), which are the source of new things, both in terms of demand and technology, and succeeded in breaking through the wall of SME problems. By building a "unique market" surrounded by information entry barriers, they have gained the ability to form prices.

How do such SMEs appear in spite of SME problems, it is necessary to break through the following three walls.

The 1st wall: Difficulty in demand information discovery activities

SMEs need to discover "spot information" about demand and technology to ensure sales, of these, there are inherent difficulties to obtain demand information compared to technical information.

They can choose the technical information they need according to the production purpose, however, as demand information is about the needs of others, the search range cannot be limited like technical information.

Also, as it will be detected from the remarks and actions of others, it is not such easy to capture the thoughts of others accurately. Because of these, it is always difficult to find highly accurate demand information.

Management based on misguided demand leads to bankruptcy. Some companies avoid this risk and rely on the outsourcing of large companies for sales.

However, the ability to discover "spot information" from a casual customer's word like that to sense the demand hidden behind it would not be lost from anybody, small and medium scale of economies would never disappear, and there will always be SMEs that develop entrepreneurial activities in terms of demand as well as technology.

However, even if you discover demand information and offer products that correspond to it, it does not always sell.

Large companies are increasing people's credibility through strong sales promotion activities, which reflexively reduces the credibility of unknown SMEs, and even if you make good ones, it won't sell.

However, this can also be broken through. If you sincerely respond to customer requests, you can have one or two customers on your side, and the customers will tell the potential customer the reputation by word of mouth. Technology is especially influential in reputation. If you respond to various technical demands of customers without dislike, it will become popular, and jobs with high technical difficulty that were refused by others would be brought in.――In such a way, the expansion of customers and the improvement of technology form a virtuous cycle, and the market will expand.

THE 2nd wall: Entry of Large Companies

When the market expands, a second wall would appear.

The entry of large companies stimulated by market expansion.

Even if SMEs have patents, large companies will develop similar products well so as not to touch the patents and sell ​​it at a low price with mass production technology. The strategy of large companies coupled with the name recognition is a big threat to SMEs.

However, although large companies have abundant management resources as a whole, the field is just one business unit of a large company, and SMEs are more specialized regarding the management resources required for the particular business.

For example, there are some parts of technology gained by accumulating experience and are in a black box for other companies, it is not easy to obtain the technical information even for a large company. As a result, it is not uncommon for large latecomers to withdraw due to poor quality.

Just as specialty stores do not lose in competition with department stores, specialized SMEs can beat large companies with diversified business.

As above, SMEs will emerge by breaking through the two walls as described above and will succeed in building their own market surrounded by information entry barriers.

At this point, it can be said that an "Entrepreneurial SME" was born.

However, the 3rd wall still remains.

I will explain about it in the next Chapter.

【12】「企業家的中小企業」(その2

2021年9月 黒瀬直宏

「企業家的中小企業」への第3の壁

 前回は中小企業問題という壁がありながら、「場面情報」発見活動(企業家活動)を需要と技術の両面で展開し、価格形成力を獲得している「企業家的中小企業」がどうして現れるかを述べました。そのポイントは、需要情報発見活動の困難と後発大企業の参入という2つの壁の突破で、これに成功すれば「企業家的中小企業」の誕生と言えます。だが、まだその存在はサステイナブル(持続可能)とは言えません。中小企業の経営資源問題の一つ、人材の獲得難を解決していないからです。企業家活動は情報共有のループで結ばれた共同体的活動でなくてはならず、経営者個人の活動に頼っていては持続できません。

企業家的中小企業は有望な事業を行っていても、人材採用は容易ではありません。人材は知名度のある大企業に関心を持ち、中小企業には冷淡です。ある経営者の言ですが、「わが社の門をくぐってくれれば説得のしようもあるが、くぐってくれないのだからどうしようもない。」この人材難が「企業家的中小企業」への第3の壁です。しかし、この壁の打破に成功している中小企業もあります。主なものとして次のような努力を指摘できます。

働き甲斐のある職場

 企業で働く労働者の目的は生活に必要な賃金を得ることです。しかし、人は労働から経済的報酬だけでなく非経済的報酬も求めます。人は肉体を動かす前に何をどのように作るかを構想し、それに基づき一定の緊張を持って労働力を支出し、成果物を得ます。労働の終わりには形が変えられた原材料だけでなく、自分の構想が現れます。人はそれを見て自分の能力を確認し、自己実現の喜びを得ます。また、その成果物が他の人に役立ったのが実感されると、喜びは倍加します。動物も労働によって生活資料を獲得しますが、その本能的労働にこのような喜びはないはずです。人の労働には非経済的報酬があり、それが損なわれると高給を得ていても、労働は苦痛となります。

中小企業は規模が小さいため、一般従業員が労働の「構想」に当たる企業の「経営計画」の策定に参加できます。最上位の計画には参画できなくても、情報共有は容易だからその計画に納得し自分のミッションとし肉付けし、自分自身の実行計画を策定します。また、「経営計画」には全く関与しなくても、受注から納品まで一貫して実務を任され、いわば個人事業者のように広い裁量によって働く場合もあります。これは専門性の高い仕事をしている企業でよく見られます。以上の場合、雇用関係に根ざす労働の「やらされ感」は薄れ、労働の成果も自分自身の能力の発現として、喜びを伴うものとなります。こういう、中小企業の特性を活かし、働き甲斐のある職場を構築することが、人材獲得に成功している中小企業の一つの特徴です。

労働条件ファースト

「経営計画」に時短や賃金引き上げを目標に掲げ、そのために労使共同で付加価値生産性を高める努力をしている中小企業もあります。生産性が上がったらその分け前を労働条件引上げに回すのではなく、労働条件を向上させるために生産性を上げるという発想です。前者の「生産性基準原理」に対し「労働条件基準原理」あるいは「労働条件ファースト」と呼べます。中小企業の労働条件が大企業に比べ良くないのは経営資源不足で価値を生み出す力が弱く、不利な価格を押し付けられ生産した価値を奪われるなど中小企業問題が重大な要因になっています。だからといってあきらめるのでなく、毎年少しずつ目標に近づく努力をしています。例えば、毎年15分の時短を続け、4年で1時間の時短に成功した企業があります。公務員並みの給与の実現を掲げ、生産性の引上げで徐々に近づいている企業もあります。その成果だけでなく、労働条件向上を目指す一丸体制も労働者を引き付けています。

以上のようにして労働市場でも自社を差別化し、大学や専門学校と太いパイプを築き、あるいは地域で知名度を高め、人材を安定的に確保できるようになれば、サステイナブルな「企業家的中小企業」と言えます。

(12) "Entrepreneurial SMEs" (2)

KUROSE Naohiro, September 2021

The 3rd wall to "Entrepreneurial SMEs"

In the last Chapter, I explained why the "Entrepreneurial SMEs" appear despite the wall of SME problems and develop activities to discover "Spot information" (entrepreneurial activities) in terms of both demand and technology to acquiring price formation power.

The point is breaking through two walls of difficulty in demand information discovery activities and the entry of large latecomer companies. If this is successful, we can say that an "Entrepreneurial SME" is born. However, the existence is not yet sustainable. Because, they have not solved the difficulty of acquiring human resources, one of the management resource problems of SMEs.

Entrepreneurial activity must be a community activity connected by an information sharing loop, and it cannot be sustained by relying on the activities of individual SME owners.

For entrepreneurial SMEs, even if they have promising businesses, it is not easy to recruit human resources. Job applicants are interested in large, well-known companies and are cold for SMEs. As one SME owner said, "If any of them come through the gate of our company, we can persuade them, but I can't help it because nobody come through. " This difficulty in human resources is the 3rd barrier to “Entrepreneurial SMEs”. However, some SMEs have succeeded in breaking down this barrier. The following efforts can be pointed out as the main examples.

A Rewarding Workplace

The purpose of workers in a company is to get the wages they need to live. However, one seeks not only economic reward but also non-economic reward from labor. People envision what to make and how to make it before moving the body, and based on the vision, spend the labor force with a certain tension and get the deliverables. At the end of labor, they can see not only the reshaped raw materials but their concept appeared. People see it and confirm their abilities, get the joy of self-actualization.

Also, when they realized that the deliverables have helped others, their joy doubles.

Animals also acquire living materials by labor, but there should be no such joy in that instinctive labor.

Human labor has non-economic rewards, and if it were compromised, even if they get a high salary, labor may be painful.

Since SMEs are small in scale, ordinary employees can participate in the formulation of the "business plan" of the enterprise, which is the "concept" of labor. Even if they can't participate in the top-level plan, it's easy to share information, so they should be convinced of the plan, flesh it out as their own mission, and formulate their own execution plan. In addition, even if they are not involved in the "business plan" at all, they may be entrusted with the actual work from ordering to delivery, and they may work with a wide discretion like a sole proprietor.

This is common in companies with highly specialized work. In the above cases, the "feeling of being forced" of labor rooted in employment relations diminishes. The outcome of labor is a joyful manifestation of one's own abilities. Taking advantage of these characteristics of SMEs to build a rewarding workplace This is one of the characteristics of SMEs that have succeeded in acquiring human resources.

Working Conditions First

There are also SMEs that have set the goal of shortening working hours and raising wages in their "management plan" and are making efforts to increase value-added productivity jointly by labor and management. Instead of spending that share on raising working conditions when productivity goes up, the idea is to increase productivity in order to improve working conditions. Compared to the former "productivity standard principle", the latter can be called "working condition standard principle" or "working condition first". The working conditions of SMEs are not as good as those of large companies. The ability to create value is weak due to lack of management resources, pressed against unfavorable prices, deprived of the value produced, etc. The SME problem is a major factor, but don't give up. We strive to reach our goals little by little every year. For example, there is a company that has succeeded in shortening the time by 15 minutes every year and shortening the time by 1 hour in 4 years. Some companies are gradually approaching by raising productivity with the aim of achieving salaries comparable to those of civil servants. Not only the results, but also the unified system aiming to improve working conditions attracts workers. In this way, they differentiate themselves in the labor market as well, building thick pipes with universities or vocational schools, and increased name recognition in the area. If they can secure stable human resources, it can be said to be a sustainable “entrepreneurial SME”.

【13】「半企業家的中小企業」

2021年10月 黒瀬直宏

一部にとどまる企業家活動

本連載第11、12回では「企業家的中小企業」に必要な条件を述べました。今回は「半企業家的中小企業」についてです。このタイプは、企業家活動の成果が一部にとどまっているため、発展性も問題性も抱えている中小企業で最も多いタイプです。企業家活動の成果が一部にとどまるとは、第1に、企業家活動の成果が技術情報発見活動に偏る場合、第2に、需要情報発見活動も技術情報発見活動もほどほどの成果しかあげていない場合、第3に、企業家活動の成果が需要情報発見活動に偏る場合です。

下請型の「半起業家型中小企業」

日本で最も多いのが第1です。これは下請中小企業によく見られます。需要情報発見活動には困難があるため、一般市場における需要情報発見活動をあきらめ、特定大企業の外注に依存する中小企業が現れます。発注者に対し受注中小企業は多数ですから中小企業間の競争は激しく、大企業が優越的な地位に立つ「対等ならざる外注関係」が形成されます。これが下請関係と呼ばれるものです。下請中小企業は親企業から価格引下げを強いられ、景気のバッファーとしても利用されるなど「販売の不確実性」は高いですが、販路が全く閉ざされるよりはましなため、親企業への従属と引き換えに、販売市場を一定程度確保する道を選択します。

 このような下請企業でも、生産技術面では企業家活動を活発に展開し、専有度の高い技術を蓄積している企業があります。その技術は親企業の内製部門より高度で、親企業が解決できない課題を解決できる技術力を持っているため、親企業にとって重要な下請企業となり、他の下請企業より「販売の不確実性」を低めています。1970年代半ば以降、このような下請企業が増えてきました。ただ、優れた技術力を持っていても、特定企業に販売の多くを依存しているため、対等な取引関係を構築できず、価格形成力を持つには至っていません。こういうのが下請型の「半企業家的中小企業」です。

「企業家的中小企業」への成長

 この「半企業家的中小企業」が「企業家的中小企業」へ成長するには、次のように、経営者の戦略構築能力が重要です。

 この企業は複数の大手エレクトロニクス・メーカーを顧客とする下請企業でした。精密加工技術を武器に売上は伸ばしましたが、「独自市場」の形成には到らない「半企業家的中小企業」で、1990年代に経済が長期停滞に陥るとともに一時的に売上は急減しました。

 売上が一時的にとどまったのは、同社再発展の種がまかれていたからです。すでに70年代後半から特殊金型を開発するなど開発活動を活発化、80年代初めには社長が「独立企業体質の確立(自立型企業)」という戦略を掲げ、経営計画として具体化、計画策定に参加した全社員がそれを共有化しました。この計画にしたがってME技術の専門家を獲得、顧客の要請を基に、カメラ電子シャッター関連のプリント基板相互をハンダでつなぐ熱圧着装置を開発しました。90年代に入り、不況を突破するため製品開発を模索する中、展示会での来場者との会話から、ニーズはデバイス間でより多量の情報を伝える方向に向かっていることを察知、熱圧着の原理を使ってフィルム素材で液晶ディスプレイとプリント基板をつなぐ新製品を開発しました。これが日経優秀製品・サービス賞の優秀賞を獲得するヒット製品となり、同社は世界市場を相手に活躍する「企業家的中小企業」に発展しました。

開発のきっかけになった需要情報を得るまで熱圧着装置の開発から7年間かかったとのことで、的確な需要情報は簡単には入手できないことがわかります。しかし、それは単なる幸運ではなく、社長が掲げた「独立企業体質の確立(自立型企業)」という戦略を全従業員が共有化していたことが、この需要情報の発見につながりました。

企業は「半企業家的中小企業」でも、経営者自身は一段上の「企業家的中小企業」の経営者と同等の能力を持つことが、「半企業家的中小企業」を「企業家的中小企業」に引き上げるのです。

(13) "Semi-Entrepreneurial SMEs"

KUROSE Naohiro, October 2021

Entrepreneurial activity is limited

In the Chapter (11) and (12) of this series, I described the necessary conditions for "Entrepreneurial SMEs". This time, I would like to talk about "Semi-Entrepreneurial SMEs". This type is the most common type among SMEs that have both development and problems because the results of entrepreneurial activities are limited.

The results are limited, firstly, when the results of entrepreneurial activities are biased toward technical information discovery activities, secondly, when both demand information discovery and technical information discovery activities produce only limited results, and thirdly, when the results of entrepreneurial activities are biased towards demand information discovery activities.

"Semi-Entrepreneurial SMEs" as Subcontractor

The first type is the most common in Japan, as subcontracted SMEs. Since there are difficulties in demand information discovery activities, some SMEs appear to give up demand information discovery activity in the general market, and depend on outsourcing of specific large companies.

Because there are many SMEs that receive orders from the ordering party, competition between SMEs is fierce, and an "unequal outsourcing relationship" is formed in which large companies are in a superior position. This is called a subcontracting relationship. Subcontracting SMEs are forced to reduce prices by their parent companies and are also used as a buffer for the economy. Although "sales uncertainty" is high, it is better than closing the sales channel at all, and in exchange for subordination to the parent company, choose a way to secure a certain amount of sales market.

Even such subcontractors actively develop entrepreneurial activities in terms of production technology, and some have accumulated highly specialized technologies. The technology is more advanced than the in-house production department of the parent company as they have the technical ability to solve problems that the parent company cannot solve, thus became an important subcontractor for the parent company, and they lower "sales uncertainty" than other subcontractors.

Since the mid-1970s, the number of such subcontractors has increased. However, even if they have excellent technical capabilities, they rely on a specific company for most of their sales, and are unable to build an equal business relationship in forming the price. These are the "Semi-Entrepreneurial SMEs" as Subcontractor.

Growth into an "Entrepreneurial SME"

In order for this "Semi-entrepreneurial SME" to grow into an "Entrepreneurial SME", the ability of the business owner to build a strategy is important as follows.

The company was a subcontractor with customers from multiple major electronics manufacturers.

Sales increased with precision processing technology as a weapon, but it was a "Semi-entrepreneurial SME" that could not form a "unique market".

In the 1990s, sales plummeted temporarily as the economy fell into a secular stagnation.

Sales were stopped temporarily because the seeds of the company's redevelopment were being sown. Already active development activities such as developing special molds from the latter half of the 1970s, and in the early 1980s, the president set up a strategy of "establishing an independent corporate structure (independent company)" and has materialized a management plan, which was shared by all employees who participated in the planning. They acquired ME technology specialists according to this plan, and based on the customer's request, they have developed a thermocompression bonding device that connects printed circuit boards related to camera electronic shutters with solder.

In the 90's, while searching for product development to break through the recession, from conversations with visitors at an exhibition, they realized that needs were moving toward transmitting more information between devices.

They have developed a new product that connects a liquid crystal display and a printed circuit board with a film material using the principle of thermocompression bonding.

This became a hit product that won the excellence award of the Nikkei Excellent Product and Service Award.

The company has developed into an "Entrepreneurial SME" that is active in the global market.

Until they get the demand information that triggered the development, it took seven years from the development of the thermocompression bonding equipment, so it is clear that accurate demand information cannot be easily obtained.

However, it was not just good luck, but the fact that all employees shared the strategy of "establishing an independent corporate structure (independent company)" that the president advocated led to the discovery of this demand information.

Even if the company is a "Semi-Entrepreneurial SME", the business owner himself must have the same ability as the owner of a higher-level "Entrepreneurial SME" to raise "Semi-Entrepreneurial SMEs" to "Entrepreneurial SMEs".

【14】「停滞中小企業」

2021年11月 黒瀬直宏

本連載では、中小企業は「発展性と問題性の統一物」であり、この本質は中小企業の3つのタイプとして現れるとし、第11、12回では「企業家的中小企業」、第13回では「半企業家的中小企業」について述べました。今回は3番目のタイプ「停滞中小企業」についてです。

このタイプは、企業家活動を展開できず、経営上の強みがないため中小企業問題に圧迫され、主として低賃金など消極的要因によって存立している企業で、中小企業の問題性をもっぱら体現している企業群です。

半失業型「停滞中小企業」

 「停滞中小企業」には2種類あります。1つは過剰労働者の大量の存在で高失業率と低賃金が基調となっている時代に、経営者も労働者も失業を避けるため開業、就業した、技術的な基盤のない半失業型の「停滞中小企業」です。仕事は単純労働集約的な組み立てや、定型的な部分加工、例えば旋盤などの単一機種による狭い範囲の加工です。受注は不安定で、低い下請単価を押し付けられ、低賃金労働への依存と経営者の自己搾取的な強労働によって存立を続けます。

 敗戦後間もなくの日本では軍需工場の全面閉鎖、生産活動の麻痺、戦地、旧植民地からの復員・引上げ者などで発生した膨大な過剰労働者が農村にも都会にも堆積し、その中から失業回避的な「停滞中小企業」が数多く発生しました。このタイプは発生基盤の高失業率と低賃金の解消により減少します。日本では1950年代後半から高度成長が始まり、人手不足・賃金上昇が急速に進行、それと共に減少が始まりました。ただ、特別の技術はなくとも低コストで生産するため、経済拡大により他律的に売上が増加することもあり、高度成長期以降においても存続が見られました。

非適応型「停滞中小企業」

 代って、非適応型の「停滞中小企業」が増加しました。産業構造の変化に対応して企業家活動を高度化できず、かつて持っていた経営上の強みは時代遅れとなり、中小企業問題に対抗できなくなる。そのため市場から退出するか、低賃金の縁辺労働力依存によりしばし延命している中小企業群です。具体的に見てみます。


高度成長期

 高度成長期には産業の重化学工業化と人手不足が進み、中小企業もこれに対応し生産品目の専門化・量産化、省力化を推進する企業家活動が要請されました。しかし、当時は職人的な勘に頼る世界で育った経営者、技能者が多く、この技術革新を推進できない中小企業も多く発生しました。

減速経済期

70年代中ごろからの減速経済期には産業の高加工度化(産業の高付加価値分野への移行)が進み、中小企業は作るだけでなく製品や技術に関する開発力と市場開拓力が必要になりました。技術と需要開発の両面で企業家活動の高度化が必要となったのです。生産の多品種少量化という中小企業に有利な変化もあり、企業家活動は活発化しましたが、一方、この時期から中小企業の市場拡大の鈍化、中小企業を巡る価格関係の不利化など高度成長期には緩和していた中小企業問題が悪化し始め、企業家活動を高度化できない中小企業は停滞化しました。

長期停滞期

90年代以降の長期停滞期には、生産の東アジア化が進み、中小企業は市場の変化に対応するというより自分自身で市場を創出する力が必要になり、日本の中小製造業の弱点であるマーケティング面での企業家活動が重要化しました。しかし、中小企業市場の大幅な縮小、価格関係の大幅な悪化など未曾有の中小企業問題の深刻化が、リスキーな企業家活動を抑制し、停滞化した中小企業が増加しました。

こうして、各時期に非適応型の「停滞中小企業」が発生します。こういう中小企業は市場から退出するか、低賃金の縁辺労働力に頼って延命することになります。90年代以降、低賃金の非正規労働者、技能実習生などの外国人労働者による低賃金基盤が形成され、これに頼る停滞型中小企業が増えています。

(14) "Stagnant SMEs"

KUROSE Naohiro, November 2021

In this series, I defined that SMEs are a "unified product of development potential and problems." This essence appears as three types of SMEs, and in the 11th and 12th Chapter, I talked about "entrepreneurial SMEs", and in the 13th Chapter, about "Semi-Entrepreneurial SMEs". And this time, I will talk about the third type, "Stagnant SMEs".

This type represents the companies that cannot develop entrepreneurial activities, oppressed by the SME problems because they have no management strength, and exists mainly depending on negative factors such as low wages. They are a group of companies that show the typical problem of SMEs.

Semi-unemployed type "Stagnant SMEs"

There are two types of "Stagnant SMEs". One is a Semi-unemployed type Stagnant SMEs without a technical foundation, where SME owners started business and workers started to work to avoid unemployment in an era when the high unemployment rate and low wages were common due to the large number of excessive workers. Work is simple and labor-intensive assembly or routine partial processing, for example, processing in a narrow range of work with a single model such as a lathe. Orders are volatile, forced to work with low subcontracting prices, and continue to survive depending on low-wage labor and self-exploiting hard labor.

In Japan shortly after the defeat in World War II, a huge amount of excessive workers accumulated in rural areas and urban areas, caused by the total closure of munitions factories, paralysis of production activities, demobilization and withdrawals from the battlefields and former colonies. From among them, many "“Stagnant SMEs”" that avoid unemployment were created. This type is decreases as the high unemployment rate and low wages that caused it have been dissolved. In Japan, high growth began in the latter half of the 1950s, labor shortages and wage increases rapidly progressed, and at the same time, decrease began. However, since it is produced at low cost without any special technology, sales may increase in heteronomy due to economic expansion, and it has survived even after the period of high economic growth.

Non-adaptive "Stagnant SMEs"

Instead, the number of non-adaptive "Stagnant SMEs" has increased. They are not able to enhance entrepreneurial activities in response to changes in the industrial structure, and the management strengths that it once possessed become obsolete and cannot counter the SME problem. Therefore, they are a group of SMEs that have left the market, or have been prolonging their lives for a while depending on low-wage marginal labor. Let's take a concrete look.

The High growth period

During the high-growth period, the shift of industry to heavy chemical industry and labor shortages progressed, and SMEs were requested to respond to this by entrepreneurial activities to promote specialization of production items, mass production, and labor saving. However, at that time, there were many SME owners and technicians who grew up in a world that relied on craftsmanship, and many SMEs could not promote this technological innovation.

The Slowdown economy period

During the slowdown economy period from the mid-1970s, transition to high-level processing industry (transition to high value-added fields of industry) progressed, and SMEs, in addition to production, were required to have the power to developing products and technologies as well as opening up new markets. It became necessary for SMEs to enhance entrepreneurial activities in terms of both technology and demand development. There was also a change advantageous for SMEs, such as production of various items in small quantity, and entrepreneurial activity has become more active. On the other hand, from this period, the market expansion of SMEs slowed down, and the price relations surrounding SMEs became disadvantageous, the problem of SMEs, which had been alleviated during the high-growth period, began to worsen, and SMEs without enhancing their entrepreneurial activities became stagnant.

The long-term economic stagnation period

During the long stagnation period after the 1990s, production in East Asia progressed, and SMEs needed the ability to create their own markets rather than respond to changes in the market. So, entrepreneurial activities in terms of marketing, which was a weakness of the Japanese small and medium-sized manufacturing industry, have become important. However, the unprecedented seriousness of the SME problems such as significant shrink of SME market and deterioration of price relations, etc., suppressed risky entrepreneurial activity, and the number of stagnant SMEs increased.

In this way, non-adaptive "Stagnant SMEs" appear at each period. These SMEs will either leave the market or rely on low-wage marginal labor to prolong their lives. Since the 1990s, a low-wage base has been formed by foreign workers such as low-wage non-regular workers and technical intern trainees, and the number of stagnant SMEs that rely on this base has increased.

【15】「中小企業の多様性

2021年12月 黒瀬直宏

中小企業の本質の現象としての多様性

本連載第11~14回で、中小企業を「企業家的中小企業」「半企業家的中小企業」「停滞中小企業」に分類し、その特徴を明らかにしました。私は連載初回で述べたように、「中小企業は大企業にない固有の発展性を内在させているが、その発現を妨げる固有の問題性も課せられている。そのため、中小企業は発展性と問題性の統一物になる」と考えています。中小企業の固有の発展性とは企業家活動に関する有利性です。固有の問題性とは大企業が引き起こす収奪問題などの中小企業問題です。中小企業の「発展性と問題性の統一物」という本質は、太陽光がプリズムを通じて分光するように、競争を通じて、中小企業の3タイプへの分化、つまり、中小企業の発展に関する多様性として現れるのです。


高い利益率も低い利益率も中小企業の方が多い

中小企業の多様性は図1でもわかります。大企業では売上高利益率▲10%~10%台に集中していますが、中小企業では分散し、低利益率の企業の割合も、高利益率の企業の割合も大企業より高くなっています。

図2はアメリカの戦前の中小企業に関するデータです。「全体」では規模が大きくなるにつれ資本利潤率が高まるものの、「黒字企業」については規模が小さいほど利潤率が高く、規模が小さくなると利潤率の高い企業の割合が増えることを示唆しています。同時に、「赤字企業」では規模が小さくなるにつれマイナスの利潤率が高くなっており、規模小さくなるほど利潤率の低い企業の割合も増えているとみなせます。

このように、国と時代を超えて発展に関する多様性が中小企業の特徴なのです。

このため、中小企業は切り取り方により発展性に満ちた企業も、問題性に満ちた企業も現れます。円錐を底面に垂直な平面で切断すると双曲線が、側線に平行な平面で切断すると放物線が、底面に平行でない平面で切断すると楕円が得られるようなものです。だが、中小企業は多様だが「ばらばら」ではありません。円錐が多様な2次曲線の統一物であるように、多様でも中小企業は「発展性と問題性の統一物」という本質を持つ一体物なのです。

アトキンソン説の誤り

 連載初回で触れたデーヴィッド・アトキンソン氏は、「規模の経済性」が働かないからとして、中小企業を一律に問題性に満ちた、前記の分類でいえば「停滞中小企業」と決めつけています。これはとんでもない誤った見方です。「発展性」も「問題性」も共に中小企業の本質として統一理解するのが正しい見方です(「複眼的中小企業論」)。また、中小企業の問題性を「規模の経済性」が働かないことに求めるのも誤りです。「規模の経済性」が働かなくてもその分野が国民経済にとって必要ならば価格の調整で労働生産性は他の分野と同レベルになるからです。そうならず、平均すると中小企業の労働生産性が大企業より低いのは、大企業セクターが販売・購買寡占の地位にあるため価格関係を自己に有利に、中小企業に不利にする力を持っているからです。この「収奪問題」のほか「経営資源問題」「市場問題」という大企業セクターが中小企業に課す中小企業問題が束になって中小企業の労働生産性を低めます。中小企業に問題性をもたらすのは「規模の経済性」のような物理的作用ではなく、企業間の関係です。物理的作用は止めようがありませんが関係は変えることができます。「複眼的中小企業論」は中小企業問題を解消すれば中小企業の発展性が花開くことを主張するものでもあります。

 以上で「中小企業を考える」の理論編は終わりとします。

(15) "Diversity of SMEs SMEs"

KUROSE Naohiro, December 2021

Diversity as a phenomenon of the essence of SMEs

In the 11th to 14th Chapters of this series, I classified SMEs into "Entrepreneurial SMEs," "Semi-entrepreneurial SMEs," and "Stagnant SMEs," and clarified their characteristics. As I mentioned in the first Chapter of the series, "SMEs have inherent development potential that large enterprises do not have, but they also have inherent problems that hinder their manifestation. Therefore, SMEs are unified product of development potential and problems. "The unique development potential of SMEs is their advantage in entrepreneurial activity. Unique problems are SMEs problems such as the deprivation problem caused by large enterprises. The essence of SMEs as the "unification of development potential and problem" appears as the differentiation of SMEs into three types through competition, that is, the diversity of SME development, just as sunlight is dispersed through a prism.

SMEs have both higher and lower profit margins

The diversity of SMEs can also be seen in Figure 1. Large companies concentrate on profit margins in the ▲ 10% to 10% range, but SMEs are diversified, and the percentage of companies with low profit margins and the percentage of companies with high profit margins are both higher than those of large companies.

Figure 2 shows data on prewar SMEs in the United States. In the "Overall", the capital profit rate increases as the scale increases, but for "Profitable companies", the smaller the scale, the higher the profit rate, and the smaller the scale, the higher the percentage of companies with a high profit rate. At the same time, it can be considered that the negative profit rate of "Deficit companies" increases as the scale decreases, and the proportion of companies with a low profit rate increases as the scale decreases.

In this way, the diversity of national and timeless development is a characteristic of SMEs.

For this reason, some SMEs are full of development potential and some are full of problems depending on how the SME groups are cut. Just like cutting a cone in a plane perpendicular to the bottom gives a hyperbola, cutting in a plane parallel to the sideline gives a parabola, and cutting in a plane not parallel to the bottom gives an ellipse.

However, although SMEs are diverse, they are not “disjointed”. Just as a cone is a unification of various quadratic curves, even if it is diverse, SMEs are one with the essence of "unification of development potential and problems.

The error in Atkinson's theory

Mr. David Atkinson, whom I mentioned in the first Chapter, said that SMEs are uniformly problematic and are classified as "Stagnant SMEs" in the above classification because "economy of scale" does not work. This is a ridiculous misconception. It is the correct view to understand both "development potential" and "problem" as the essence of SMEs ("Synthetic Theory of SMEs"). It is also a mistake to ask for the problem of SMEs that "economy of scale" does not work. Even if "economy of scale" does not work, if the field is necessary for the national economy, price adjustment will bring labor productivity to the same level as other fields. On average, the labor productivity of SMEs is lower than that of large enterprises because the large enterprises sector is in the position of sales- purchase oligopoly, so it has the power to make the price relationship advantageous to large enterprises and disadvantageous to SMEs. In addition to this "deprivation problem", the "management resource problem" and "market problem", which are the SME problems imposed on SMEs by the large enterprise sector, are bundled together to lower the labor productivity of SMEs. It is not the physical effects such as "economies of scale" that bring problems to SMEs, but the relationships between the enterprises. The physical effects cannot be stopped, but their relationship can be changed. The "Synthetic Theory of SMEs" argues that if the SME problem is solved, the development potential of SMEs will flourish.

This is the end of the theoretical Chapters of "Thinking about SMEs".