Dimensions of knowing is a framework for exploring your understanding of the interrelationships between various aspects of a topic or event.
It encourages us to systematically examine various entangled aspects of our knowledge of things and events.
The ease with which we are able to explore the different interrelationships indicates our default approach to knowing and may reveal potential blind-spots.
Declarative knowledge — nouns
Understanding the relevant information (and other resources) — quantity, quality, breadth, depth, balance, trustworthiness, interpretation, meaning, etc. Understanding the characteristics of the inputs and the outputs.
What are the facts and what are the opinions?
What concepts and ideas are relevant / irrelevant?
What is static?
Procedural knowledge — verbs
Understanding the actions, processes, sequences and methods — connections, dependencies, transparency, complexity, repeatability, etc.
How did events unfold?
What approaches were taken / avoided?
How do things change?
Etiological knowledge — causes
Understanding the context, the past, the environment, the structures, the power dynamics, the ideologies, the big picture — opportunities & threats, values & beliefs, inequalities & barriers, etc.
What is the background and the context?
What structural forces are influential / peripheral?
Where has it come from?
Teleological knowledge — effects
Understanding the purpose, the future, the objectives, the motivations, the direction of travel, the future possibilities — coherence, achievability, challenge, justification, priority, progress, etc.
What is the point?
What outcomes are intended / unintended?
Where is it going?
Self knowledge — subjectivity
Understanding yourself — role, efficacy, image, esteem, identity, needs, narrative, conflicts, etc.
How does it relate to you?
How are you affected by / do you affect it?
What is your perspective?
Social knowledge — relativity
Understanding other agents — relationships, partnerships, interactions, conflicts, competition, differences, inclusiveness, etc.
How does it relate to other people?
Who influences / is affected by it?
What other perspectives are relevant?
How does our awareness of the details affect our understanding of the process?
How does our commitment to a particular approach affect our understanding of the details?
How does the background and structural context influence our awareness of the possible or desirable outcomes?
How do our motivations and intentions shape our understanding of the system and context?
How does our relationship with others affect our understanding of the issue?
How does the issue affect our relationship with others?
How does your image of yourself determine your preferred approach?
How does the way you approach things contribute to your sense of identity?
How certainly does the chosen approach lead to the desired outcome?
How does the chosen approach facilitate or hinder various possible outcomes?
How do the intended outcomes affect other people and their relationships?
How do other people contribute to or frustrate the purpose?
How would someone else perceive and prioritise the details?
How might the facts of the situation change if someone else were involved?
How do the details identified as important challenge or reinforce the structures?
How does the background determine which details are considered important?
How do the background and power structures influence your sense of self and role?
How do your sense of identity lead you to reinforce or challenge the system?
How does your self-image influence your intentions and motivations?
How do the intentions and outcomes impact your sense of identity?
How does the intended outcome influence the details you notice?
How does your awareness of the details affect your perception of the intended outcomes?
How do the details of the situation impact on your sense of self?
How does your sense of identity influence the details you notice?
How does your chosen approach resonate with other people's needs and preferences?
How might other people have facilitated or hindered the process?
How do other people reinforce or challenge the power structures?
How does the background determine how other people engage with the situation?
How does the context constrain or enable the approaches taken?
How does the process reinforce or challenge the system?