Meaning schemas are mental constructs that help us to make sense of (descriptive function) and to engage effectively with (directive function) the world around us. They do this by helping us to:
identify and prioritise personally salient goals
anticipate agentic actions that will increase our chances of achieving those goals
characterise, predict and prioritise phenomena within our environments
select appropriate responsive actions to these events and predict the outcomes
communicate effectively and efficiently with others in order to engage in collaborative actions
I'm using the term 'meaning schema' to include all the various ways in which our brains use past experience to inform present understanding and determine future action. Meaning schemas can exist on a spectrum ranging from episodic to generic depending on the extent to which they incorporate information from a range of previous experiences.
Episodic schemas ('Is this like what happened then?') rely heavily on patterns within a specific experience for predictive comparison, either because the individual has limited experience of that context or because a specific past experience has been assigned particularly high significance by the individual (e.g. trauma)
Iterative schemas ('Is this like what has happened often?') are based on patterns within repeated similar experiences or situations for predictive comparison
Habitual schemas ('Is this like what tends to happen?') are based on estimating or averaging the most likely characteristics and outcomes of a variety of similar experiences
Generic schemas ('Is this like what should happen?') are more abstracted conceptual models of experience which may take the form of explicit rules or belief structures
Schemas can also be divided into world-view schemas (beliefs about how the world works) and self-view schemas (beliefs about ourselves).
Another category of schemas worth thinking about is meta-schemas. These are schemas that we use to manage our own meaning schemas (models of meta-cognition). They determine the loops we are likely to favour in the reflective process. One benefit of ReCoCa analysis is that it also facilitates meta-reflection — reflection on how you reflect.
Jones, N. A., Ross, H., Lynam, T., Perez, P., & Leitch, A. (2011). Mental models: An interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society, 16(1). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26268859
Gładziejewski, P. (2016). Predictive coding and representationalism. Synthese, 193(2), 559–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0762-9
Lengyel, M., & Dayan, P. (2007). Hippocampal contributions to control: the third way. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 20. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2007/hash/1f4477bad7af3616c1f933a02bfabe4e-Abstract.html
Millikan, R. G. (1995). Pushmi-pullyu representations. Philosophical Perspectives, 9, 185–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214217
Schemas have three main components:
These are cognitive (symbolic) and affective labels that help us to organise and articulate our memories of and knowledge about our experiences and enables us to recall appropriate meaning schemas in response to environmental phenomena. These correspond to the comprehension/coherence aspect of meaning. Failure of these components lead to phenomena being indescribable.
These are relative cognitive and affective value assignments which enable us to prioritise, differentiate and group elements within a schema (and to distinguish between and prioritise schemas). These correspond to the significance/mattering aspect of meaning. Failure of these components lead to phenomena being incomparable.
These are spatiotemporal and conceptual correlations between elements within a schema that enable us to explain and predict phenomena. These correspond to the purpose aspect of meaning. Failure of these components lead to phenomena being inexplicable.
King, L. A., & Hicks, J. A. (2021). The science of meaning in life. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 561–584. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-072420-122921
Martela, F., & Steger, M. F. (2016). The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1137623
Meaning schemas are stored in long-term memory (dispositional beliefs) but can be recalled into working memory (activated) in order to guide decision making and behaviour within particular contexts (occurrent beliefs). Whilst activated they can be modified by the reflective learning system if discrepancies are detected.