Reflection is frequently conceptualised as a conscious, rational process (see Marshall, 2019). However, a full understanding of reflection needs to take into account what happens at the non-conscious level. The reflective system in this site is proposed to operate interactively at various levels of conscious awareness.
Some neuroscientists argue that conscious processing is merely a post-hoc narrative that the brain creates so that we can communicate the outputs of non-conscious processing to others (Oakley & Halligan, 2017; Sklar et al., 2021).
Jordi, R. (2011). Reframing the concept of reflection: Consciousness, experiential learning, and reflective learning practices. Adult Education Quarterly, 61(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713610380439
Korthagen, F. A. J. (1993). Two modes of reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(3), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(93)90046-J
Marshall, T. (2019). The concept of reflection: A systematic review and thematic synthesis across professional contexts. Reflective Practice, 20(3), 396–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2019.1622520
Tomlinson, P. (1999). Conscious reflection and implicit learning in teacher preparation. Part I: recent light on an old issue. Oxford Review of Education, 25(3), 406. https://doi.org/10.1080/030549899104062
Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. W. (2017). Chasing the rainbow: The non-conscious nature of being. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01924
Sklar, A. Y., Kardosh, R., & Hassin, R. R. (2021). From non-conscious processing to conscious events: A minimalist approach. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2021(2), niab026. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niab026
Dual process theory proposes that our brains use two different systems to process information and make decisions.
fast
automatic
effortless
uses probabilistic patterns and heuristic rules
gestalt or holistic parallel processing
context dependent
slow
deliberative
effortful
uses formal rules and procedural reasoning
analytical or sequential processing
generalisable
System 2 processing is usually presented as happening consciously whereas System 1 processing often happens with varying degrees of conscious awareness.
Some authors have proposed that the systems are not independent but that they constantly interact. Others have proposed they are not two separate systems but one system operating along a spectrum from system 1 type behaviour to system 2 type behaviour. Still others propose that processing happens on multiple spectra (fast-slow, automatic-deliberative, effortless-effortful).
According to spectrum-based models, the degree of conscious awareness will vary depending on the context and nature of the processing. In some cases, the only sign we have of the process is its affect on our behaviours. In others, only the outputs of processing emerge into conscious awareness, usually in the form of some emotional state or physical reaction (gut feeling) which may then be articulated into a conscious evaluation. In others, we may be aware of the inputs (perceptions) and outputs (conclusions) but not aware of how we got from one to the other. And in some cases, we are aware of the whole process.
Henriques, G. (2022, April 29). There are two types and two systems of cognitive processes: A new model of human cognitive processes is proposed. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/theory-knowledge/202204/there-are-two-types-and-two-systems-cognitive-processes
Sloman, S. A. (2014). Two systems of reasoning: An update. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-Process Theories of the Social Mind (pp. 69–79). The Guilford Press.
Smith, L. S. (2023). Reframing reflective practices: Using dual-process theory and areas of awareness to conceptualize teacher reflection. SN Social Sciences, 3(6), 96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-023-00676-w
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220–247. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1
Varga, A. L., & Hamburger, K. (2014). Beyond type 1 vs. type 2 processing: The tri-dimensional way. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 993. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00993
See also Brain stuff