Search this site
Embedded Files
Hall of Mirrors
  • Home
  • Reflective process
  • Reflection system
    • Representation
    • Comparison
    • Causation
  • Conscious and non-conscious mechanisms
  • Reflection and emotion
  • Meaning schemas
  • Discrepancies
  • Working with discrepancies
  • Working with meaning schemas
  • Working with Representation
  • Working with Comparison
  • Working with Causation
  • Working with conscious and non-conscious processes
  • Working with emotions
  • Group reflection
  • A-Z of reflective tools & techniques
    • Action learning set
    • Appreciative inquiry
    • Archetypes
    • Both-and thinking
    • Brookfield's mirrors
    • Causal layered analysis
    • Cause-and-effect mapping
    • Clean language
    • Circles of concern
    • Cognitive biases and distortions
      • Questioning cognitive errors
    • Cognitive interviewing
    • Concept mapping
    • Context analysis
    • Counterfactual thinking
    • Dialogical approaches
    • Emotional categorisation
    • Emotional reappraisal
    • Episodic unpacking
    • Expectation chronicling
    • Force-field analysis
    • Gamestorming
    • Incubation
    • Johari window
    • Journaling
      • Alternative narrative
    • Ladder of inference
    • Learning-unlearning-relearning
    • MCII
    • MECSTAT
    • Metaphors
    • Mindfulness practice
    • Naming
    • Need analysis
    • Obtaining feedback
    • Operant conditioning
    • PACT goals
    • Paradoxical challenges
    • Perceptual mode isolation
    • Perspective shifting and self-distancing
    • Randomisation
    • ReCoCa analysis
    • Reflection loop prompts
    • Repertory grid and semiotic square
    • Scenario planning
    • Self-confrontation
    • Socratic questioning
    • Socio-linguistic analysis
      • Personal labels
    • Story-boarding
    • SWOT analysis
    • Theory of planned behaviour
    • Time outs
    • Twenty statements
    • VITAE
  • Articles and thought pieces
    • Metaphors for reflection
    • Brain stuff
    • Creating the learning gap
    • Creative reflection provocations
    • Critical reflective thinking questions
    • ARENA guided reflection
Hall of Mirrors

Johari window

The Johari window is primarily intended as a group reflective activity. You choose from a list of adjectives ones that you believe accurately describe you. Your peers also choose from the same list an equal number of adjectives that they believe accurately describe you. You then  analyse the similarities and differences between the adjectives chosen (and not chosen) by yourself and others to sort them into four quadrants.

  • Arena — adjectives chosen by you and by others. This represents the public you — known to self and to others. This could represent your authentic social self or the self you like to present to others (masking).

  • Façade  — adjectives chosen by you and not by others. This represents the concealed you — know to self and not others. This could represent aspects of yourself that you do not reveal or possibly deluded self-perceptions (especially if you think these aspects of yourself should be obvious to others).

  • Blind spot — adjectives chosen by other and not by you. This represents the oblivious you — known to other and not you. This could represent aspects of yourself that you are denying or misconceptions of you by others.

  • Unknown — adjectives not chosen by you or others. This represents irrelevant characteristics or potential characteristics that no-one recognises yet.

Johari Window - Arena (known to self and others), Façade (known to self not others), Blind spot (known to others not self), Unknown (known to no-one)

Alternative uses

As well as using the window to categorise personal attributes, you could use it to compare and categorise other things perceived by yourself and others within a specific situation, such as:

  • Meaning schema components — details within a situation noticed or ignored (remembered or forgotten), language used to describe a situation, comparators used to evaluate the the importance or salience of factors in the situation, categories used to recognise similarities and differences, patterns and connections between things, explanations and predictions made

  • Contextual factors — how you and others perceived the environment in which something happened

  • VITAE factors — effects, actions, thoughts/beliefs, intentions, values

All content on this site is created by David Winter and shared under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Google Sites
Report abuse
Page details
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse