How do you study? Do you reread your material? Do you cram? Is this the best way to learn? What do the results yield? Unfortunately, most people believe that rereading material and cramming is the best way to learn contrary to the evidence. Throughout this course you will learn the most effective techniques for long term substantive mastery of your subject, While at the same time learning how to avoid the illusions of knowledge that many fall for. Using over a hundred years of research over the most effective ways to learn, this Workshop will help you design classes where students can obtain mastery and knowledge that stick long-term.
Hi my name is Evan Campbell, I am a graduate of Wright State University with a Bachelors of Science in Organizational Leadership. After graduating I started a small Digital Marketing & Publishing company with a couple of my fraternity brothers. Since then I've had the pleasure of learning and utilizing multiple new technologies throughout the course of my job. This is what led me to pursue my Master's in Educational Technologies and subsequently the research covered in this workshop about effective learning.
Outside of the classroom you can find me with my friends watching movies, traveling, or listening to music. Let's learn like we were meant to!
How to Use Retrieval Practice to Improve Learning is authored by Pooja Agarwal, Henry Roediger, Mark McDaniel, and Kathleen McDermott. The guide covers how we currently use retrieval practice and what we can do to use it more effectively in our learning. The authors not only back up their findings with research, but they also provide ways to implement retrieval practice, possible challenges with retrieval practices, and frequently asked questions.
Retrieval Practice and Transfer of Learning: Fostering Students' Application of Knowledge is written by Steven Pan and Pooja Agarwal. It's about making sure students are able to transfer their learning, or in other words apply what they've learned in a myriad of situations. This guide breaks down the multiple types of transfer, as well as the most effective and ineffective ways to implement it.
Making Learning Stick: Evidence and Insights to Improve Teaching and Learning is a 65 min. video presentation by Dr. Mark A. McDaniel at Franklin & Marshall College. In the video he covers research in cognition as it pertains to learning to help us understand why the ways we choose to learn our ineffective. He suggests that learners make their studying more elaborative to build the strongest connections to the material.
How People Learn is a 25 min. video presentation by Henry L. Roediger at Michigan State University from June 2014. In the presentation Dr. Roediger uses 130 years worth of Empirical research to explain why practices such as space retrieval, the testing effect, and making learning challenging are necessary for real long-term mastery of a subject. His Insight on how we learn give us ways to enhance our future learning.
Make it stick: The Science of Successful Learning is written by Peter Brown, Henry Roediger, & Mark McDaniel. This book covers many different studies that prove how we learn today is ineffective, and what we can do to create more meaningful connections to the materials that we study. The authors use real stories from around the world to support the research and material in the book.
After completing this workshop, instructors will be able to identify 2 ineffective methods for studying and in their own words explain why they are ineffective.
After completing this workshop, instructors will be able to explain why people continue to utilize ineffective study methods.
After completing this workshop, instructors will be able to write 4 paragraphs describing for tips for effective learning.
After completing this workshop, instructors will be able to critique 2 class outlines and suggest alternative study methods learned in this workshop.
After completing this workshop, instructors will be able to explain three methods of effective learning and how they would Implement them in their classroom
People often think that learning is best when it is easy, however they couldn't be more wrong. Learning is most effective when it is effortful and requires more mental processing. This is the basis of all the techniques that have been scientifically proven to be more effective for learning. By creating desirable difficulties, connection to study material can be strengthened, which leads to more retention and application of what is learned (Brown, Roediger, & McDaniels, 2014).
One study method used by so many students is massed practice, or cramming as it is commonly referred to. Since it works in the short-term, it's often mistaken as effective, but research shows that the gained knowledge isn't retained in the long term. While cramming may be effective for getting a good grade, it does not lead to mastery of a subject or strong connection to the material. Unfortunately because it produces good grades in the short-term, many feel fluent even when they shouldn't since cramming is among the least productive study methods (Brown et al., 2014).
Rereading is by far one of the most used tools for studying material, but it is also one of the most ineffective ways to gain mastery. Students think that rereading works because it triggers cues from their short-term memory, but strong connections to the material and actual retention come from the long term memory. Despite being amongst the least effective ways to learn, rereading is the number one study method used by over 80% of college students, which shows us how bad our judgment can be when evaluating our learning (Brown et al., 2014).
People's poor judgement is probably what has allowed so many ineffective study strategies to persist despite the over 130 years of research proving their inefficiency. We all too often fall for the illusions of fluency induced by ineffective study habits, and rarely do we recognize it. As humans we are also prone to misleading ourselves by trying to explain the world and our place in it using our own cognitive biases and illusions. We could greatly enhance the learning process by becoming aware of these pitfalls and learning how to avoid them (Brown et al., 2014).
Students should be encouraged to practice spaced retrieval to improve their learning. Retrieval practice is a challenging form of learning, which means that it is much better for retaining knowledge long-term. By forcing ourselves to pull previously learned knowledge to the forefront, we create a struggle that strengthen those connections for future retrieval. Not only does retrieval practice help with memory, it helps make the knowledge more flexible and transferable (Agarwal, P.K., Roediger III, H.L., McDaniel, M.A., & McDermott, K.B.,2018).
A more powerful alternative to mass practice is interleaving practice. When you interleave the practice of two or more skills you obtain greater results overall as opposed to practicing them one at a time. This practice increases your ability to transfer your learning successfully between different situations because it is stored in the a different part of the brain more associated with the higher-order motor skills in contrast to massed practice. Research even states that interleaving practice increases one's ability recognize context and discern between situations using the proper strategies to address multiple possibilities (Brown et al., 2014).
Student should also focus on elaboration to improve their mastery of new subjects and generate more mental cues to recall for later application. This process of detracting more layers of meaning from you're learning is easily accomplished by paraphrasing new material in your own words or relating it to your life outside the educational setting. Elaboration can even be in forms of visual comparison such as the solar system to the structure of an atom (Brown et al., 2014).
When you combine retrieval practice with elaboration you get reflection, or taking new lessons, reviewing them afterwards, and asking yourself questions. By taking time to evaluate what went right, what went wrong, areas of improvement, and how you would act differently in the future you greatly increase connections to new material. Research shows this method to be more fruitful than spending hours taking notes or rewriting PowerPoint slides (Brown et al., 2014).
Any instructor should explain to their student how learning takes place to help dispel any of the illusions of knowledge that people usually fall prey to. Instructors should help their students grasp fundamental concepts such as having desirable difficulties, that our brains change, and setbacks being essential to learning. When students understand how people learn, it becomes easier for them to recognize the benefits of the newly implemented study methods when compared to traditional ones. Since old study methods give so many a false sense of fluency, it's up to learners to work that much harder to combat this effect (Brown et al., 2014).
Reflection is a powerful tool for enhanced learning and can be easily incorporated into a classroom setting. One technique that can be utilized is free recall, or when you give your students time at the end of the class session to write as much as they can about what they remember from the lesson. By comparing what they wrote to their class notes, students can accurately gauge any gaps in knowledge, and formulate questions for future classes that address their individual shortcomings (Brown et al., 2014).
Retrieval practice can be used as a study method in the form of testing groups, instead of using study groups where all that is focused on is memorization and is usually led by one person. Testing groups require students to work together, and pull on their own knowledge to answer a question. Instructors can take this one step further by asking one of the students in the group to explain a concept, but allowing the rest of the group to ask questions that lead the student to the right answer (Brown et al., 2014).
Over a hundred thirty years of research I have culminated in the numerous findings found on this page. To gauge how well you have grasped these concepts hit the button below to take the assessment.
This assessment is to evaluate how well students have grasped the material covered on this page according to the following Learning Objectives:
After completing this workshop, instructors will be able to identify 2 ineffective methods for studying and in their own words explain why they are ineffective.
After completing this workshop, instructors will be able to explain why people continue to utilize ineffective study methods.
After completing this workshop, instructors will be able to write 4 paragraphs describing for tips for effective learning.
After completing this workshop, instructors will be able to critique 2 class outlines and suggest alternative study methods learned in this workshop.
After completing this workshop, instructors will be able to explain three methods of effective learning and how they would Implement them in their classroom
Agarwal, P.K., Roediger III, H.L., McDaniel, M.A., & McDermott, K.B. (2018). How to use retrieval practice to improve learning. [PDF file]. St. Louis, MI: Washington University. Retrieved from http://pdf.retrievalpractice.org/RetrievalPracticeGuide.pdf
Brown, P.C., Roediger III, H.L., & McDaniel, M.A. (2014). Make it stick. The science of successful learning. Cambridge, MA. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Fandmcollege. (2015, April 08). Making learning stick: Evidence and insights to improve teaching and learning. [Video file]. Retrieved September 22, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=japP8Cr0q6g
MSU Graduate School. (2014, June 14). How people learn, Dr. Roddy Roediger. [Video file]. Retrieved September 22, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tz8gVPHhFE
Rohrer, D., Dedrick, R.F., Agarwal, P.K. (2017). Interleaved mathematics practice: Giving students a chance to learn what they need to know. [PDF file]. Retreived from http://pdf.retrievalpractice.org/InterleavingGuide.pdf