New Faculty Mentoring
The purpose of the UCM College of Education mentoring program is to:
Create a culture of support leading to the development of inclusion, belonging, and collegiality among faculty;
Ensure successful transitions into the College of Education and University;
Increase faculty retention and success; and
Support faculty at various levels of career development and advancement.
The College of Education Mentoring philosophy:
Faculty mentors play a key role in living out the college’s mission: The UCM educator is a competent, caring, reflective practitioner committed to the premise that all can learn. Through establishing effective mentoring practices, faculty mentors affirm and reinforce a sense of belonging and accomplishment during different time points of career development.
How to Use the Mentoring Framework
Within this document, faculty and staff will find resources and materials to support the mentoring program, guidelines to support the mentor/mentee relationship, resources to support the transition to teaching in the College of Education, along with Promotion and Tenure documents. Active links to support mentors and mentees can be found at the end of this document.
Who is a Mentor/Mentee?
Who is a mentee?
College of Education mentees are new UCM full-time tenure-track or instructional faculty. Rather than participating in formal mentoring, adjunct instructors participate in onboarding activities with their direct program or department contact. This handbook contains resources that will support both the mentoring program and onboarding activities.
Who is a mentor?
College of Education mentors are faculty who represent a variety of backgrounds and roles in the college, such as chair, faculty member, or instructor across programs and departments. Mentors may not be the department chair for a person hired in their own department. Mentors may be identified through self-selection or identification by a colleague. A mentor is someone who is organized and proactive, accessible and timely, uses effective communication, encouraging, and supportive, and open-minded.
Mentor/Mentee Support
The College of Education Professional Development Committee will provide oversight and support to the mentor/mentee teams or groups to support the professional growth and development of all College of Education faculty. The formal relationship will be for the duration of the first year of hire. Support may continue after the first year if both parties choose.
Matching Mentors and Mentees
Self-identify through the interest survey circulated each spring
Chairs may identify faculty who they feel will serve well as mentors
Faculty may nominate a colleague as a mentor
Identifying Mentors
Each spring semester the College Assembly Professional Development Committee will distribute a survey to faculty seeking interested individuals in becoming a mentor. Hiring committees and/or Department Chairs may identify individuals who exhibit mentoring qualities, or a colleague may nominate an individual who displays mentoring characteristics. Once interested individuals are identified, the committee will work with departments and programs to match mentors to mentees and will support the relationship through professional development sessions
Mentoring Relationships, Models, and Meeting Format
Four Phases of the Mentoring Relationship
The Professional Development Committee assigns mentors based on recommendations from the hiring committee and/or program. A pool of mentors will be established to assist with this process
The mentor establishes the relationship with a welcome letter (see Mentor Resources below)
Completion of mentor/mentee orientation hosted by the COE Professional Development Committee
Mentor/Mentee determine meeting times/days that work for both mentor and mentee at the beginning of the semester
Mentor/Mentee set initial goals at the beginning of the mentoring program
Mentor/Mentee selects mentor resources and activities
Set regular meetings and check-ins to support mentor/mentee goals
Mentor/Mentee dyad evaluates annual goals
The committee gathers data via mentoring program survey to assess mentoring framework, processes, and materials to analyze and inform program effectiveness.
What should a mentoring meeting look like?
New UCM faculty members have a lot of information that comes their way! As mentors, it is helpful for us to know what the focus of the mentoring program is and who we can connect our mentees
If the mentee is new to higher education and UCM:
You will meet at least 6 times annually
Once at the beginning of the year
Twice during the Fall semester
Twice during the Spring semester
Once at the end of the year
You are always welcome to meet more often!
If the mentee is NOT new to higher education and UCM:
You will meet at least once each semester
Mentor/Mentee partnerships should select at least 3 of the following activities to complete annually.
Initial meeting (within first weeks of semester)
Develop Mentoring S.M.A.R.T. Goals together
Check-in meetings
Attend a professional development session together
Observe teaching and reflection with discussion
Meet over coffee or for lunch
Additional Recommendations for Mentor/Mentee Partnership
Mentors should. . .
Support College of Education onboarding by reviewing common questions and expectations of the COE
Use resources to orient mentees at the university and college level, such as the COE Faculty website, Acronym Guide, etc.
Be open and available to answer questions on a regular basis (outside of scheduled meetings)
Respond to and share in frequent two-way communication (emails, lunches, etc.)
Connect their mentee to other resources outside of the mentor’s expertise or experience
Be goal oriented by helping the mentee prioritize and balance approaches within the three areas of teaching, service, and scholarship considering committee obligations, teaching load, and opportunities to engage in scholarship
Support mentee professional and personal development
Support mentees by reviewing and discussing mentee resources available to them
Mentees should. . .
Review documents and ask questions to gain confidence and knowledge of the inner workings of the college and university
Be inquisitive and open to advice – be willing to ask questions and listen openly to determine the next steps after receiving input from their mentor
Be goal-oriented – work to organize and prioritize teaching, service, and scholarship to achieve work-life balance as a new faculty member
Recommended Mentor/Mentee schedule
August-support in committee assignment
September- schedule a peer observation
October- Submission of conference proposal support
November- support in completing the annual report and walking through the dossier process (using the COE template)
December- Reflecting on course evaluations
January- Support in brainstorming for article work/assisting with determining an article topic and assistance with IRB
February- Support article writing/peer observation/other support
March- Support article writing/peer observation/other support
April- As needed
May- Reviewing dossier to capture work during the first year, including peer observations, course evaluation reflections, conference proceedings, etc.
2nd year: repeat the first year and include opportunities to support in adding to the dossier, including conversations regarding publications, conferences, diversity in committee work, etc.
3rd year: Reviewing of dossier and support in preparation for submission, etc.
Oversight of the Mentoring Program
The COE College Assembly Executive Committee and Professional Development Committee oversee the mentoring program through the creation and review of materials and supportive resources for both mentors and mentees. Each spring semester, the Professional Development Committee will share a Mentor Preference Survey and use results to pair new mentees with mentors in the COE. At the start of the fall semester, a mentor/mentee orientation will be hosted by the Professional Development Committee. This orientation will include time to establish mentoring goals and may serve as one of the suggested meetings for the year. Yearly evaluation of the program will be conducted through end-of-year surveys. The COE College Assembly Executive Committee will disseminate survey results to the Professional Development Committee annually to review and determine ways to strengthen the mentoring program.