Raw Processing

What is Color space?

The storage of an image in a JPEG incorporates a certain colorspace. The known colorspaces are:

      • ProPhoto

      • Adobe RGB

      • sRGB

Some people ask: Does raw have a colour space?

See http://www.earthboundlight.com/phototips/in-camera-color-space-for-raw-shooters.html

Unless you're being painstakingly scientifically nerdy of course:

http://forum.luminous-landscape.com/index.php?topic=22471.msg168050#msg168050

Microsoft Windows Explorer

Microsoft Windows File Explorer Thumbnails

Windows depends on CODEC packs - these contain specific elements that encode / decode media files so that they can be displayed. Microsoft introduced a Codec Pack for Windows (6.3.9721.0) in 2014. These codecs are probably included in Windows 10. If your camera model is newer than that, your raw file will not display as a thumbnail without assistance from new codec packs. Olympus also offers codecs for Microsoft Windows but they are very old. See the release dates in this Olympus web page

    • ACDSee Photo Studio versions provide two tools - the DAM/Cataloguer tool and raw codecs to display thumbnails in Windows Explorer.

Microsoft Windows File Explorer Date Taken field

Windows Explorer, when you view files as Details (rows of filenames, one file per row) allows you to see the Date Taken field from EXIF. However, it is not switched on by default so you have to right click on the headings of those columns and add column to the view.

Having done that, if your computer cannot decode .ORF raw files, then that column might still be empty.

      • Use photome - an old program to display EXIF of one file

      • Use EXIF Date Changer - to create copies of your raw files with the EXIF Date Taken added as prefix to the filename or to force the usual Windows date/time of the file to be the EXIF Date Taken

From https://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/69959/when-is-each-of-these-exif-date-time-variables-created-and-in-what-circumstan

the EXIF tags. Date/Time Original and Create Date should be the same for a modern camera picture. But if you were, for example, scanning old pictures, slides, or negatives, the Create Date should be the date/time you saved it to the file and then you would alter the Date/Time Original to the correct time, if you knew it. Obviously, few people are going to know the exact time a picture was taken and probably not going to bother. Modify Date would be the timestamp for when you might alter the image or it's metadata.

Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop

Formerly Lightroom (LR) and Photoshop (PS) were sold as standalone software. You could get updates in features and bug fixes for free until the major version number changed. For example Lightroom 5 owners would get all LR 5.1, 5.2 etc... versions but the support expired when LR 6 was released.

Whilst some people may be reconciled to do without new features, what hurt the most was the more recent cameras would have raw files that were not readable by retired LR and Adobe Camera Raw (ACR) versions. ACR is the component of Photoshop that reads raw files. Addiitionally, in countries like Australia, the price differential for a new version of Adobe software was artificially high relative to the US price. No you could not buy and use the US product outside of US because the electronic registration process would block you.

Adobe subsequently came out with the Creative Cloud package for photographers. This gives LR and PS at something like AUD 10 per month, with a commitment to pay for one year. Under this scheme, all updates would be free regardless of major version number. An applet on your computer would notify you of a new update, stream it down and install it. Essentially, the programs would be typical Windows or Mac programs. Except that they would need to use the internet to refresh their validity with the Adobe licence server (invisibly) every 30 days. As previously, the programs would be able to operate without an internet connection except for that brief moment every 30 days when they would need contact with the Adobe server.

The monthly price to Australia would not be significantly higher than the US price. Note that this comes up to AUD 120 per year for LR and PS. Some competitors have responded by reducing their prices or offered seasonal discounts that are similar. Some non professionals (those who do not make an income out of photography) are unhappy at spending AUD 120 per year, forever. That is true. On the other hand, two purchases of softdrink / coffee at a shopping mall or one meal would match the monthly price of the CC subscription.

In certain cases, you can still buy products like LR standalone from the Amazon store and other online retailers, but these standalone versions would follow classic purchase agreements - when the next major version number appeared, you would not be able to update to that. It is likely that Adobe will move away from standalone packs for LR and Photoshop and only offer them on a subscription basis. Photoshop Elements (which includes ACR - Adobe Camera Raw) will still be offered as a standalone package.

In standalone cases like this, there is a free DNG Convertor for Windows and Mac, downloadable from Adobe. The DNG Convertor is free, updated to the latest camera raw formats. You can run this program against one raw file at a time or nominate a set of raw files to be produced. The resulting .DNG files would then be readable by the older LR and ACR if you want to cling onto your money and refuse to pay the Adobe monthly subscription.

Links of interest

How do you choose as a starting "look" for Lightroom / Adobe Camera Raw - Use a Color Profile

Choose a Color Profile - in Lightroom Classic CC April 2018 onwards, this item is now made more obvious and easy to use.

Downloadable Lightroom Develop Presets that are like "Olympus JPEG Color"

FAQ: What is the difference between a Develop Preset vs a Color Profile?

From the Lightroom Queen's article,

    • Profiles are layered adjustments - when you apply a Preset, it changes your slider positions. Profiles don't

    • Profiles can incorporate Colour Look Up Table (LUT) mappings. Presets don't

    • Profiles have a strength adjustment.

    • End users can create Presets easily, Profiles need the SDK

FAQ: If I dial in a specific WB in Kelvin, when I bring it into Lightroom, that number is not held and LR adjusts it even though I choose "WB as shot"

A search across the web yields lots of discussions with no definitive answer. The expectation is simple Lightroom should read the file's EXIF value and hold that.

The proposed answers seem to vary:

    • there is a bug in the Lightroom camera profile for that camera

    • the White Balance algorithm is different for the camera and Lightroom and they use different starting foundations to arrive at the image result (which is what you want) and the numeric value

    • the use of a camera profile or a develop preset applies some offset bias to the white balance

    • "As Shot" is not definitive and set in concrete - it just means that Lightroom reads the EXIF metadata as a target but makes up it's own image result and calculated number to achieve that result.

Bottom line:

Forget about treasuring the number, just shoot with white balance reference cards and let Lightroom carry out a calibration for that shot or sequence of shots.

Lens Correction Profiles

Lens Correction Profile for Rokinon / Samyang 7.5mm fisheye (in one case, a correction that de-fishes the image).

      • Get the set in a .zip file from http://dl.dropbox.com/u/46420541/Rok7_5_lcp.zip (courtesy of KenW at DPR forums)

      • Put the unzipped .lcp files in this Windows folder: C:\Users\yourusername\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\1.0\Downloaded

      • Go into Lightroom, choose Lens Corrections > Enable Lens Corrections >

        • Maker: Panasonic

        • Model: Rok 7.5 ....

        • (these strange names are used in the XML of the .LCP files)

Back of the camera LCD

FAQ: When I bring in the raw file into Lightroom / (put other software here) it looks different from the back of the camera LCD

Each independent, third party raw editor / post processing software

    • has different algorithms to translate the image data from the raw file onto the screen before you save/export the JPEG

    • reads the EXIF metadata in the raw file to a different extent. There are fields in EXIF called MakerNotes which third party software can read but haven't the foggiest how to interpret and action

    • has different factory defaults (called Color Profiles in Lightroom and Adobe Camera Raw) to apply to the raw file. There are also Develop Presets that you can use to batch process the raw and export to jpeg in bulk

    • may have different ways to apply different defaults on a camera model or even down to the camera serial number or to the ISO setting of that camera.Short answer - you must expect the third party program to display a different look to your raw file than the camera's interpretation on the back of the LCD screen. Unless you use Olympus Viewer which is the Olympus supplied software that matches the camera's firmware very, very closely. You know how people say "This is a jpeg I created SOOC from Lightroom" ? Like "I didn't touch any sliders or adjust anything, it is straight out of Lightroom" That premise is a load of hooey

Processing Techniques