Here is the simplified version of Islam:
Islam is a treacherous political ideology using religious fervor, deception, double-dealing and terror to subdue people who do not embrace orthodox Islam. This is not a "new twist" on Islam." This is not a perversion of Islam. Deception and violent Jihad, mistreatment of women, Jew-hatred and Sharia law are not un-Islamic, aberrant distortions of Islam.
If anything is a perversion of Islam it is the "moderates", those who ignore half of Islamic scripture - the half that sanctions exactly what the so-called "radicals" are doing. That is, unless the "moderate" is practicing his Islamic taqiyya (deception in the cause of Islam.) In that case you are soon likely to see that "moderate" in the headlines as an ISIS or al Qaeda fighter, terrorist, or spokesperson.
The psychotic behaviors and actions of most Muslims in the news are integral and original to the teachings and actions of Muhammad and those who followed. These beliefs and practices are faithful to the Qur'an and promoted by virtually all of the most respected Imams today. Islam as "a religion of peace" is the public relations side of Islam promoted by our gullible media and ill-advised and ignorant politicians based on the early writings and actions of Muhammad later abrogated (replaced; made better) by his later supremacist, intolerant, hateful, and violence-promoting writings and actions which our leaders inexplicably ignore. Deception and terror are Islam's most highly developed skill set. Blind uncritical tolerance due to gross lack of values worth defending comprise ours.
Non-Islamic Egyptians lecture Obama on his flawed pro-Brotherhood policies
Click HERE to read their pleas for a saner US policy toward Egypt in a letter to the Muslim Brotherhood-pandering President of the United states..
Federal Security Policy targets average Americans instead of the source of terror. Feds make source of Islamic terror off limits.
Read more about our out of control and assinine Washington policy HERE. The course our "leaders" have chosen is to spy on us, on ALL Americans instead of the known sources of Islamic fascism, of hatred and of terror plots against Americans, the Mosques. FBI failure due to radical "political correctness" in denying agency the ability to relate Islamic-inspired terror to Muslims. The Islamic apologists and defenders of the FBI and Obama administration are bending over backwards to claim there is no way the Boston Marathon Massacre terrorist could have been identified prior to the event. It doesn't matter that the atrocities were committed by two devout and well-trained Muslim Jihadists who just visited a Muslim nation crawling with trained Muslim terrorists, who claimed Jihad on their social media sites, listened to Jihadi music and who made phone calls plotting jihad. Why do you think defenders of Obama's national security policy believe that foreknowledge of such attacks is so impossible? Could it possibly be because the Obama administration has adopted administration-wide policy that Islam, Islamic Jihhad, Jihad, radical Muslims, or radical Islam shall not be associated with any act of terror, violence, intimidation, or offense committed by Muslims? Could it be because all references to those terms are deemed offensive and are not to be used as the basis for FBI or State Department or military training or for identifying individuals or their threats to our national security?
Unfortunately, that is the case. And that is why such tragedies will continue to occur - until that insane Muslim-pandering policy is reversed and sanity is restored to our national security program.
See more on this topic HERE.
Terms to use and avoid when speaking or writing about Islam and Muslim acts:
Whenever you hear someone refer to "radical Islam", ask them this: Is there a non-radical or benign Islam?
There can be a peaceful "aspect" to Islam - when Muslims are a small minority in an infidel culture they will attempt to lay low and blend in. But that attitude temporarily exists to protect and promote their expansion. Islam inherently is not benign - it is a radical ideology. It is aggressively supremacist and intolerant of others as soon as it sees an opening to be so.
Muslims who do not follow their "faith" can be or at least appear to be friendly. They may be considered "cultural" Muslims, or Muslims in name only, just as Christians can be. But Muslims who are devout can also appear to be friendly. They do this out of deceit - their practice of taqqiya to gain an advantage. How can we know the difference? Most of the time, we can't.
Yes, as with any ideology, political movement, or religion, there are apostates and fringe elements, and those who identify with the group or movement, even though they know little about it, don't practice much of it, and are generally indifferent to it. This represents a portion of the "moderate Muslims" we assume exist in great numbers. Strange, isn't it, that so many "moderate" Muslims still insist on being associated with Islam, with the intolerant and supremacist Islamic doctrine being exposed and the toxic behavior of Muslims in the news that is impossible to ignore. This cognitive dissonance is almost enough to cause us to conclude that most Muslims really do endorse most of the subversive Islamic doctrine and ideology after all. They're just a little bit more "under the radar" about it.
Islamophobia is not the fear of Islam. Islamophobia is the fear of speaking out against the rapidly growing religion/ideology that is out to repress all who do not follow its doctrine.
Islam is NOT moderate
"I was the first to expose the notion of "moderate Islam," which is used as a means to canonize a "non-Islamic Islam." I don't know why they call it "moderation." This "moderation" means violation [of the laws] of Islam."
Allah calls you to do this, not just the Fuhrer...
Why Islamic doctrine is worse than Nazi Fascism. Nazi's were motivated by a man. Islamic fascism is motivated by a god, Allah that generates a religious fervor behind everything they do. Islam goes beyond the evils of Nazi Germany. See the evidence HERE And explore a new Islam awareness website HERE called Global Infidel TV. This site compiles most important videos, books and websites about Islam, and provides a "social network" type facility for like minded infidels seeking and spreading the truth about Islam. Don't call it merely a religion! Islam is a totalitarian political system masquerading as a faux-religion. Mistakenly giving Islam protections as though it is a religion will only enable Islamists to use these protections as a cover to destroy our Constitutional Republic and achieve Islam's political supremacist purpose.
The majority of Islamic writings focus on how Muslims are to control the Infidel. That is fascist politics. See the evidence HERE.
The Muslim Brotherhood in America
A 10-Part On-Line Course, FREE
Created by Frank Gaffney, one of the foremost national security and Islamic experts in America
Click HERE for the Executive Summary and to get started with the course
Facts of life:
There are "moderate Muslims" - those who appear to be less devout - and less "radical." But beware of feigned moderation!
Just as there are nominal or cultural Christians there are nominal "moderate" Muslms. But here is the BIG difference. Those who appear to be nominal Christians 99% of the time are truly nominal Christians. They are rarely really devout Christians attempting to appear "nominal." They are not attempting to deceive. Christians will let you know where they stand with regard to their beliefs if they are truly devout.
On the other hand, many Muslims in the US who appear to be "moderate" are not likely to be truly moderate. Some may be truly moderate, indifferent, westernized individuals. But know this: Islamic doctrine supports the appearance of Muslims as "moderate" to temporarily hide their intentions and blend in with the western culture - all the while working to undermine our Republic, government, legal system, and our way of life to impose theirs. This is one aspect of "stealth jihad."
What does it mean, "Islam is Islam?" It means that historic, orthodox Islam as taught, practiced, and promoted by Muhammad and Islam's subsequent leaders call for the ideal Muslim to emulate Muhammad in every facet of life. Why? Because Muhammad is considered "the most perfect human being" and is worthy of emulation. Devout Muslims make every effort to emulate Muhammad and his teachings, just as devout Christiasn attempt to emulate Christ and His teachings.
What is the difference? Those who emulate Muhammad emulate a life promoting supremacism, intolerance, terror, conquest, middle ages social justice, and low worth of human life. Those who emulate Christ emulate a life of loving others, forgiveness, tolerance, and the high worth of human life.
Here is something else to be concerned with: Just as nominal Christians will have a tendency to support the values of Christianity when push comes to shove, even truly moderate Muslims will likely side with devout Muslims when push comes to shove. Note the comments of the "non-Muslim" president when he proclaims he will side with the [U.S. Muslim] immigrants if the political winds shift in an ugly direction.
"Islam is not a religion of peace that "radical" Muslims have hijacked.
Islam is a radical ideology that liberals are ignoring."
The claims that "Islam has been hijacked by radicals" and Islam is "a religion of peace" may be more than wishful thinking. Such claims by many are purposeful deception. Islam itself, not just the mindset of the "radicals", is a radical ideology. Islam is radical in the sense of not being just "different", but being diametrically opposed to the Judeo-Christian princples and legal systems we and our forefathers have taken for granted for generations. The sense of morality is different, the sense of justice is different, the sense of right and wrong are different.
Yes, there may be a few truly moderate Muslims in the US - Dr. Zuhdi Jasser M. D.is
considered to be one. But Islamic experts in the United States warn that such moderates (if any Muslim can truly be "moderate") are a rare breed. (See "Sufi Islam"
here.) So-called "moderates" are overwhelmed by the overwhelming majority of Islamic leaders in the US and in the world who are Islamists: Muslims (the media calls them "radicals") who practice the historic, orthodox version of Islam which is supremacist, intolerant, lying, seditious, warring, and whose objective is to impose sharia law on the west by any possible means. Isn't it rather odd that Zuhdi Jasser considers himself, a devout, consrvative orthodox Muslim
? As it turns out, most so-called "moderates", many of whom are high level advisers in the Obama administration, are not moderate in the mold of Jasser. They are "moderate" in the mold of the 9-11 Mosque Imam Rauf, or an Americanized version of Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Isn't it rather odd - and telling - that those Muslims who are proclaimed "moderate" by the media turn out to be not so much. This is absolutely true when you dig into their background, or wait a year or two to observe their action
s. The question needs to be asked: What portions of the Qur'an, Hadith and Sura need to be cut out or spiritualized for a Muslim to become a true "moderate?" Major sections.
And the great majority of Muslims don't do that. They are "moderate" only in the sense that they are not currently practicing violent jihad or attempting to impose Islamic Sharia law..
Many in our culture embrace "diversity" and "change" out of a sense of benevolent tolerance or dissatisfaction with the status quo. Be careful what you wish for or what you allow to happen out of a sense of "tolerance." Some forms of "diversity" out there kill individual liberty, constrain moral choices, and reverse the course of human civilization. Islam is one of those options.
But where do you start
if you are just tuning in to this problem? This web site is designed to simplify the Islamic threat for those who are now beginning to pay attention. We will define terms, suggest books and websites, clarify concepts of Islam compared to western thought, and highlight unhelpful attititudes and actions by clueless American politicians and others.
Radical Islam is Islam.
To quickly get to the point of why Islam is a theat, go here
. And to understand what "true Islam" is, go here.
*While the common expression is "clear and present danger", in the case of Islam the danger is not all that clear to many of our politically correct, cultural diversity-addicted public officials. Therefore, I resort to the more accurate phrase "real and present danger."
"We must realize that when tolerance becomes a one way street it leads to cultural suicide"
Lt. Col. Allen West is one Congressman who gets it. More here
. And a great quote from Allen here
. One of the most straight-forward speeches I've seen about the Islamic threat is in the video, below.
More on tolerance being a "one way street"...
Austrian Member of Parliament Ewald Stadler addresses theTurkish Ambassador about Turkey's practice of "one-way tolerance" in response to the recent beheading of a Catholic Bishop in Turkey in the name of Islam and the Turkish ambassadors complaint about the lack of Austrian "tolerance." During Stadler's address someone asks, "why the drama" at which point Stadler is at his best. Listen up, US Congress!
Books on Islam:
Some are written by Islamic obsfucationists such as Karen Armstrong
who ignore the components of Islam that are supremacist and violent. Others are written by Islamic experts such as Robert Spencer or Wafa Sultan or Daniel Pipes or Mark Steyn who provide the truth of Islam and sound the alarm about Islam's means, methods, and intent. Here is a list of the best books
Which two or three books should you start with? An essential read is "The Grand Jihad" by Andrew C. McCarthy. He makes clear that there are hundreds of millions of Muslims who are of concern - not merely the "terrorists." Jihadi's include the whole gamut of Muslims who are working hard to replace our culture with theirs.
Here's one for sure: An ex-Muslim, Wafa Sultan, has one of the best basic primers on Islam with her book "A God Who Hates
Some of the best websites are listed to the left, at the bottom of the column under the heading "Other web sites."
Demographics are on the side of Islam.
The birthrate in Islamic nations and among Muslims in nations being Islamicized, especially in Europe, is several times that among native western populations. This coupled with the practice of many European nations to encourage immigration to offset their lack of an adequate workforce due to their aging populations compounds their demographic problem. Several presently western/Christian nations such as France, Spain, Britain and the Netherlands will have a majority of Muslims by 2030. This huge problem is explored in this video clip
and in this book, America Alone by Mark Steyn.
A principle source of Islamic teaching is the Qur'an
, which is the word of Allah
as spoken through the prophet Mohammad
. "Muslim" is the name of the people whose religion is "Islam", and whose preferred doctrine is "Islamic."
And don't miss the "Who's Who" section.
It reveals which side of "Islam is the Religion of Peace" discussion some well known people have positioned themselves.
Nature abhors a vacuum. The decline of Christian fervor and respect for our own country and culture is creating it. Islam smells western weakness and decay. Islamic fervor is filling it. Read more here
The two houses:
dar al-harb: "House (Realm) of War": territory ruled by infidels
A foundational Islamic doctrine teaches that there are two areas of the world where Muslims abide: either in Islamic nations, or in nations ruled by infidels.
Islam is a "rellgion of peace" in Islamic nations - well, at least in Islamic nations where everyone is in agreement on the Islamic doctrine in vogue at any point in time.
Islam is engaged in ideological warfare in territories ruled by or under threat from infidels. This struggle (Jihad) may be either violent or non-violent. Both forms of Jihad honor Allah.
Does this help explain things?
Swiss Criticised, Threatened for Exercising Right to Prohibit New Islamic Minarets
Minarets are the stamp of Islamic domination in an area, a symbol of local conquest in keeping with their supremacist ideology. Switzerland has had enough of them so the citizens voted overwhemingly in a referendum to outlaw new minarets. No, they are not simply towers for amplified calls to prayer five times a day. As the Prime Minister of "moderate" Islamic Turkey stated,
“The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets, and the faithful our soldiers...this holy army guards my religion."
For their efforts to preserve their culture, the Swiss are now subject to two condemnations from the Islamic world. One from Saudi academicians who condemned violating Switzerlands freedom of religion principles. This condemnation coming from, of all places, a nation that does not permit ANY churches or synagogues. Hypocrisy?
Here is a wonderful banner/logo created by Atlas Shrugs we could all rally around:
Mosques in America: A Trojan horse promoting sedition.
Defending against mosques in your community
Mosques in the United
States have increasingly proven to be dens of sedition against our form
of government, our Judeo-Christian heritage, and culture of freedom and
free speech. The rapid growth of the Islamic population in the US is
creating the damand for more mosques in our communities. Is your
community one of these targeted for a new mosque? People and communities
are catching on to the goals of Islam and are open to ways to guard
against Islamic incursions.
There is a new
book released for e-readers including Kindle, I-pad, and personal
computers titled "Mosque! House of Prayer or Site of Sedition: An
Action Guide for Communities."
This e-book is available at Amazon.com HERE.
Click HERE to defend against a new mosque in your community
Click HERE for Islam "Quick Facts" printable page.
Click HERE for Action Plans to counter the Islamic Threat.
Click HERE for Action Plans for Christian Churches
Current examples of our Islamo-ignorance...
ESPN commentator fired for correctly comparing Nazism with Islam
ESPN commentator was fired from ESPN for tweeting an accurate comparison of Nazism with Islam. The full story is reported HERE. The problem with the firing was that Schilling was correct, but not politically - what he wrote did not serve the agenda of ESPN, which like most businesses, does not want to offend anyone, not even those who are faithful to a terrorist, Nazi-like ideology which in this case is Islam. For those who want more convincing of the similarities between Nazism and Islam, click HERE.
Another attack on the US by a Muslim that has nothing to do with Islam
Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez is the latest Muslim attacker who has nothing to do with Islam. More HERE
An example of response from a Muslim to this website...
Below is an email I received today from an apparent Muslim who takes issue with the facts on this website. He believes that facts he disagrees with is "hate mongering", much like many non-Muslims in our own culture in the US believe. He, like many, would rather label the truth "Islamophobic" rather than accept the current events all around us - that Islam is an ideology of deception, that Islam promotes and sponsors more violence and terror in the world today than all other ideologies combined.
The Islamic ideology promotes the brainwashing of Muslims and infidels alike. These are facts - current events - that are in the news every day. Too many, both Muslim and non-Muslim alike - prefer to persist in their deception and ignore the facts all around us. They prefer to naively persist in the deception that violence, jihad and mayhem have nothing to do with Islam - and nothing to do with Muslims.
Is ISIL Islamic?:
While Obama and his Muslim-heavy team continue to insist that ISIS, ISIL, al Qaeda, the Taliban, and every other clearly Islamic terror group is not "Islamic", here is a video from a former Muslim who claims otherwise. His logic is bullet proof, pardon the expression...
In fact, these groups are more "Islamic" (follow the examples of Muhammad and the teachings of the Qur'an) more faithfully than the every day average semi-apostate Muslim. Unfortunately for the rest of us, the cultural and semi-apostate Muslims identify with the fundamentalists more than we care to admit and demonstrate their sympathies in ways that implement their well-honed Islamic doctrine of taqiyya (deception) to the fullest.
Below is a reply from a Muslim who takes issue with this website, and especially with the above video:
just here to tell you that being anti islamic won't really do much.
Really it's not going to give islam a bad name at all. Infact alot of
what is present on your site is VERY weak and is completely obvious that
you lack knowledge about islam.
i noticed one thing about
''Brother Rachid's" video that you had shared on your site and i'm here
to tell you that countless number of muslim sheikhs have crushed almost
every single claim and lie he has spread. and alot of callers have
exposed his intentions and strategies and him easily fleeing away from
If there is a particular topic you're interested on proving me wrong. then please mention it. I await your reply.
Did I or will I respond to Badr? No. Why not? Several reasons. First, a Muslim who defends his religion will lie. Islam teaches taqiyya (deceit and dissimulation) to defend or promote their beliefs. That is a well honed skill set of Muslims steeped in their Middle Eastern Islamic doctrine and tradition. Second, the material presented on this website is based on many experts on Islam from a Western perspective. Those are sources I trust and rely on. Badr is a stranger who I do not know, do not trust, and who represents an ideology that promotes lying. Third, Badr's email address is email@example.com which I find amusing. Fourth, my focused mission is to reach the infidel, the kafir, the non-Muslim to promote the truth about Islam. I do not want to waste my efforts in dealing with individuals who choose to abide by an ideology that is the number one producer of terror and violence in the world today.
Media and our Islamo-ignorant government believe that Oklahoma beheading by a Muslim in the name of Islam has nothing to do with Islam. More of this insanity HERE.
Media and our Islamo-ignorant government believe that IS, ISIL, ISIS, and every other Islamic terror group who terrorize in the name of Islam have nothing to do with Islam. More of this insanity HERE.
Lone Survivor: An example of everything that's wrong with our understanding and policies toward Islam. This movie depicted political correctness gone way bad. It is also a film worth avoiding because
it distorts the truth about our enemy... Read more, HERE.
Our government may claim they did not really mean what their new policy seems to say, but their actions to date betray their denial.
This is one step beyond The Twilight Zone ....
the O'Zone, just as poisonous and deadly.
Obama's state department is now calling devout Muslims "enemies of
Islam." This is madness. Are counter jihadists considered enemies of
State Dept Offers $10 Million Reward For Kill or Capture Of 'Enemies Of Islam' IJ Review, August 12, 2013
As with most things his administration does, I’m sure Obama will be
shocked when he reads in the newspapers about the State Dept. declaring a
$10 million bounty on the head of what it calls an “enemy of Islam.”
From a State Department Press release:
The United States condemns in the strongest possible
terms the cowardly attacks today in Baghdad. These attacks were aimed at
families celebrating the Eid al-Fitr holiday that marks the end of the
Muslim holy month of Ramadan. The terrorists who committed these acts are enemies of Islam and a shared enemy of the United States, Iraq, and the international community.
Obama’s representatives tell us we don’t take sides in religious
wars, but somehow it’s okay to issue a State Department “fatwa” against
the enemies of Islam?
What rational explanations can you offer?
Formerly "Great" Britain (now Muslim Britain) capitulates to Muslim demands to prohibit Robert Spencer from entering the country. This action portends increased suppression of the truth by spineless Western leaders to avoid Muslim backlash: Appeasement on steroids. Read more from Robert Spencer, HERE. Boston Marathon Massacre. Our national security leaders are complicit in allowing acts of terror by followers of Islam. They have scrubbed their training materials of anything that associates Muslims with hatred or terror, and continue to ignore Islam as a fascist, supremacist political ideology wrapped in faux religion. Three articles further explore this problem: How we enable radicalization; our Federal Government: Which side are they on?,
Our leaders remain ignorant of who to trust and who not to trust in Afghanistan. More on our leadership's poor judgment of all things Islam HERE, HERE, HERE.
Read this important analysis of each presidential candidates understanding of Islam. Three out of eight "get it."
Listen to noted bible teacher John McArthur here
describe the characters in the Qur'an and Sunna and compare them with those in Revelation as he relates current events in the middle east. Even if you are not religious, know that these Muslims are and they are acting on their beliefs. Chilling!
Anti-Christian and anti-Semitic sentiment and persecution has been increasing in Egypt over the past several years. So has confusion and inconsistency of US policy toward Egypt. Read more here
Islam's Yemen-based Al Qaeda has promised continuing small-scale attacks against the United States to inflict broad economic and morale damage to the US. Read more here.
Muslims in Yemen target Jews in Chicago - or planes over east coast - A big deal on Friday, October 29 was the multiple flights containing explosive materials in UPS parcels bound for the US from Yemen. Of course Obama squeezed out promises from the Yemen leadership that they will conduct a thorough investigation - just like Mr. Fox. Read more here.
Border infiltration from sharia-breeding nations. You thought too many illegal Mexicans was bad enough? Check out these new videos from WSB-TV-Atlanta television here and here.
Mosque at 9-11's Ground Zero: First You Bomb - Then You Occupy The audacity of Isam. Bloomberg needs a backbone.
More on this continuing atrocity here
, and here
"Failed" Bombing by Muslim in Times Square
But the attempt had its intended effect: perpetuate fear and intimidation against those who mock Muhammad or speak/act against Islam. More here
. The ill-informed or ill-willed will likely once again dismiss this as just another act of a lone loon or depressed Muslim when in fact such acts are endemic to the Islamic ideology and representative of your typical Jihadi next door
From an Iranian-American:
"I have refused to accept several organizations that seek to combat or expose the antics of "radical" or "extreme" Islam, because I know that it is not extremism that is causing the violence...it´s mainstream, typical, normal, traditional, specified, canonical Islam."Amil Imani Read the entire article
South Park Cartoons - Example of Ongoing Islamic Intolerance and Caving by O'Reilly - Islamists do murder people who depict Muhammad in images or who mock Islam in any manner. South Park gently mocked Mohammad and its creators are now the subject of Islamic revenge. These events were discussed on the O'Reilly show (video below). The good news is that O'Reilly showed it. The bad news is that he expressed his own fear and dhimmi attitude at the expense of free speech when he said "the risk [of free speech] is higher than the reward." He said "I hate to give into the intimidating forces of evil, but you got to deal with reality", which translated means: He will give into the intimidating forces of evil. This was certainly an ignorant statement to make in the face of Islamic initimidation, especially from a commentator who makes his living off of free speech. This display of fear is an admission that he will not report facts if he feels threatened. His credibility should plummet. And if this icon of cable feels threatened, you know that millions of moms and grandma's are likely intimidated as well. This demonstrates that Islam is an evil, manipulating, fascist ideology.
Example of growing western accommodation of intolerant and boorish Islamic bahavior - Shoe throwing by "sensitive" Muslims condoned in Scotland. View the really big shoe throwing HERE.
What is the future of the Islamic threat? What might diminsh that threat in the future? Find out HERE.
"What Islam is Not" - a new short presentation on how Islam behaves when they reach certain population milestones, HERE.
The morphing Jihadi: "A blond, blue-eyed, small framed, middle-aged female. It couldn't get any further from your typical 'terrorist' profile." That's why law enforcement officials should be targeting the ideology and the belief-system. But they aren't. And they won't. More HERE.
Beware of Christiane Amanpour on ABC News - just hired from CNN...
Another Jihad against America...
Al Malaki Cannot Reconcile being American with being Muslim
"I eventually came to the conclusion that jihad against America is binding upon myself just as it is binding on every other Muslim..."
For audio, click here
For news story click here
More Muslims Being Muslims in the Army...
Army Investigates Alleged Attempt by Soldiers to Poison Food at Fort Jackson
Thursday, February 18, 2010
The U.S. Army is investigating allegations that soldiers were attempting to poison the food supply at Fort Jackson in South Carolina.
The ongoing probe began two months ago, Chris Grey, a spokesman for the Army’s Criminal Investigation Division, told Fox News.
The Army is taking the allegations “extremely seriously,” Grey said, but so far, "there is no credible information to support the allegations." [Is the investigation complete? Is "political correctness" or fear of Islamic retribution causing ultra-caution?]
The suspects were part of a Arabic translation program called "09 Lima" and use Arabic as their first language, two sources told Fox News. Another military source said they were Muslim.
Grey would not confirm or deny the sources’ information.
Fox News' Catherine Herridge contributed to this report.
Profile Profile Profile
In 2004, Daniel Pipes addressed the need to profile individuals
, not just the devices they use to blow things up. Since then, many more responsible individuals are renewing that call to common sense
. The profile: Muslim, Men,15 to 40 years of age, traveling alone, one way ticket, paid cash, no luggage. Not the ridiclous system currently used that requires airport screeners to arbitrarily call aside every "nth" person. This results in seaching the 10-year-old little girl on her way to Disney with her family, or the 62-year-old woman just released from surgery in Cleveland, and letting the 20-year old Arab man, likely Muslim, have a free pass.
Question: What religion is claimed by virtually all individuals involved in terror acts of the last 10 years? What gender were they? What was their age and national origin?
Those who are against screening for nationality, gender, age, and religion prefer to ignore the facts at all cost. Aren't we yet tired of being singled out for searches and scans while those most likely to commit these acts are ignored?
It appears that Obama's plea to European and Middle Eastern nations to enhance their airport screening is falling on deaf ears
. The solution would be that planes failing to transport properly screened individuals will not have landing rights in this country. Period. More dithering.
We are on our own against terror...
December 25, 2009:
...but for the grace of God. And thank the brave, observant passengers. Obviously, with Janet Napolitano saying "the system works" and the next day saying "the system failed" she does not instill confidence in government providing security. We are on our own out there.
The device did not blow up the plane. But everything else worked as planned - for the "alleged terror suspect", as Obama describes the Muslim terrorist.
When will our nation's desire to buddy up and befriend those who hold to this fascist ideology meet reality? See here.
Will Obama and the FBI spend weeks puzzling over the motives of this individual? Abdul's religion couldn't possibly have motivated his actions - no of course not. By the looks of this 1,161 word Yahoo article
, with the words "Islam" or "Muslim" not even appearing once, the average naive reader would never conclude an Islamic connection. Is it really possible that most people think that the name of the ideology that spawns terror is irrelevant? More here
What the US is doing wrong about Islam.
The US "reacts" to terrorist actions. All the rest of US policies are aimed at not offending Muslims. Our current policies are bad for America and do not address the root of the problem. Read more here