--(1) The court may direct a meeting of experts of like speciality.
--(2) The court may specify the issues which the experts must address when they meet.
--(3) Any such meeting is to be regarded as "without prejudice".
--(4) After the meeting the experts must prepare for the court a statement of-
----(a) any issues within their expertise on which they agree; and
----(b) any such issues on which they disagree and their reasons for disagreeing.
--(5) Instead of, or in addition to, such statement the court may direct that the experts prepare an agreed statement of the basic "science" which applies to the matters relevant to their expertise.
--(6) Such a statement must be as short as practicable.
Notes
Back to Part (33. Experts and Assessors)
Previous Rule (33.10 Contents of report)
Next Rule (33.12 Consequence of failure to disclose expert's report)