[re]Growth
[re]Growing the connection between the isolated River Avenue District & its surrounding urban form
[re]Growing the connection between the isolated River Avenue District & its surrounding urban form
In [re]Growth, the historic urban form is examined and used to determine how we can revive the strong community roots that once grew in this urban site. Historically, the River Avenue District was connected to adjacent neighborhoods by an urban grid & a streetcar system. This concept uses linear parks to reconnect the urban grid that has been severed by highways for several decades.
Within the district, the redevelopment relies on the principles of mixed-use developments. Residents will be able to live, work, and shop all within this central neighborhood core. To further emphasize community connection, a focus is placed on non-vehicular accessibility within the neighborhood by providing ample pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connections.
A controversial method undertaken in this project was the decision to close many existing streets or convert them to pedestrian or transit use only. However, the traditional street layout prioritized vehicles over people, and by designing a neighborhood that is not reliant on vehicles, it creates an environment for people of all socioeconomic levels to co-exist.
The River Avenue District lies on the north bank of the Alleghany River in Pittsburgh, PA, USA. This vacant expanse of land was once home to a strong industrial core with a lively, dense community. However, due to its chronic flooding, it became negatively known as the North Side Flood District, and the once culturally rich neighborhood core has been left to degrade into a vacant brownfield.
*Photos above provided by the Historic Pittsburgh Collaborative
re[Growth] as a concept indicates the regrowing of connections between the River Avenue District & adjacent communities. The connections are envisioned by a series of linear parks that relink the urban grid that has been severed by the highways. The linear parks dissect the vehicle-focused grid with spaces designed for people.
In the proposed circulation, multiple neighborhood streets are proposed to be closed or converted to pedestrian or transit use only. This method is controversial considering this area currently features large amounts of fast, cut-thru traffic. Suggestions by stakeholders had been made that we should increase the vehicle load of existing streets & increase efficiency at intersections to handle the cut-thru traffic. Alternatively, by reducing street capacity, my design reduces the desirability for drivers to use this neighborhood as a shortcut to the highway. This allows more space to be dedicated to people within the district & alternative transportation options.
In the overall masterplan, notice the five green "fingers" extending from the riverfront towards Troy Hill. These are the connecting linear parks described in the concept diagram. Within the site, pedestrian trails parallel to the riverfront intersect the five parks. This interconnected park system creates a variety of recreation & transportation options, including a recreation loop & direct connections to points of interest.
In the core development, the concept of re[Growth] through linear parks works to repair the disconnection from point to point, but what about the lost connections between people? The relationships between neighbors are what make a community, so how can that be addressed through design? In the design of the building forms, the decision was made to create dense superblocks with an average height of 6 stories. This choice allowed for the allocation of public gathering spaces edged by buildings with ground floor gastronomy & retail.
In the design, the density of the development (floor area ratio of 2.9) realized a 50% lot coverage rate, which allowed the other 50% to be available for semi-private courtyards, plazas, and parks where people can gather & interact.
Even though the neighborhood receives a relatively high building density indicated by the FAR value of 2.9, most existing buildings were still able to be retained to preserve the historic character of the community. Only four buildings were proposed to be razed in order to create a more consistent building form on the main streets.
A lot of factors were at play when designing the neighborhood core. The end goal was to create a well-lit space for people to enjoy with very limited interactions with vehicles. My thought process to achieve that goal, the design would center around the building forms and street layout. My buildings generally follow the principles of a superblock with an interior courtyard, but what makes the buildings different are the angles.
On the ground plane along the pedestrian promenade, the angled buildings create a "funnel" that draws people into the corridor. Then as you approach the riverfront, the angles of the buildings create a surprising, open plaza after being constricted along the promenade, similar to the methodology used by Frank Lloyd Wright.
Then the theme of angles continues to the roofs of the buildings. Angles & terraces are created to increase the number of sunlight hours in all outdoor spaces by limiting shadow creation & increasing solar capture. The terraces also work to lower the perceived height of buildings at street level by bringing the buildings close to the pedestrian scale.
This streetscape improvement shows an example of the commercial district along Progress Street. This is the main vehicular connection through the site. Instead of increasing the number of vehicular lanes, space has been dedicated to alternative uses and traffic calming initiatives are employed. These initiatives are designed to slow down drivers subconsciously via methods such as edge friction & shared-use spaces.
The choices employed here reflect the decision to enforce the idea that this is a neighborhood street, not a highway shortcut. If the street had been designed into a stroad (a wide, high-speed commercial strip), that would encourage more vehicular traffic, not relieve the current levels of traffic.
Within the design, Chesbro Street is proposed to be converted into a pedestrian promenade. This promenade connects a proposed passenger train station to Progress Street & the riverfront. The buildings that border the promenade, feature first-floor active spaces such as restaurants, cafes, and retail. These spaces create activity & life while providing residents with close-to-home shopping & dining.
The entire length of the promenade features a stream that replicates Butchers Run, a long-buried stream that once ran through the site. The stream creates a series of edges used for gathering, while also managing stormwater on the site.
On the riverfront, the promenade opens into riverfront plaza. In the plaza, a tight grid of trees slowly decreases in density as you stray further from the stream. Straight through the plaza, the River Avenue corridor is converted into a shared space for transit, bikes, and pedestrians, while on the riverfront a series of stairs creates an overlook & river access.
Stormwater Stream
Along the entire length of the pedestrian promenade, this stream acts as a replica of the stream that used to flow through this site. In various weather conditions, the stream will act to collect, filter, and slowly release water back into the Alleghany River, while also acting as the first line of defense against flooding.
Take a walk down the promenade in this series of photos. Starting at the train station, you make your way to the riverfront plaza.
You will be able to see various elements of the design including bridges over the stream, and the use of edges as active space.
A Walk to the River
Thank you for viewing my project
Morgan Clutter
West Virginia University | Class of 2022
*Click on individual images for full-screen views