Reflecting campus priorities to support equitable access to engaged learning for all IU Indianapolis students, the Institute for Engaged Learning (IEL) will focus the 2025-2026 academic year funding to support ePortfolio integration at the course level. The goal is to increase, improve, and sustain ePortfolios as part of the curricular structure assignments and activities in a course or series of courses. Given this priority, we seek new and veteran faculty dedicated to implementing ePortfolios in new ways or deepening/transforming their ePortfolio-engaged initiatives in credit-bearing experiences. For applications that meet these criteria, the IEL will offer support through additional funding streams, summer/faculty development session, communities of practice [CoP], and online resources.
The Art History Survey is among the quintessential college courses viewed by some as lacking in practical or personal career utility. Moreover, large 100-level courses have limited opportunities for meaningful engagement between the student, instructor, and material. I would like to apply the taxonomy of ePortfolios to reimagine the art history survey milemarker assignment in a way that guides students through the project in a manner that 1. Scaffolds skill identification, acquisition, and demonstration, 2. Introduces the importance of community and instructor feedback and personal reflection through the academic process, and 3. Encourages students to put the skills they have learned in art history into appropriate contexts for career readiness and personal fulfillment.
It is difficult to choose a single NACE career competency that I would like students from Art History 102 to acquire. Among the options, I would emphasize the importance of Career & Self Development and Critical Thinking. The Mile Marker assignment, as currently figured, gives students a lot of room to pursue their interests in a way that also challenges them to consider why those interests guide their intellectual development. I’d particularly like to see students, many of whom love art and desire to become artists, develop a better vocabulary and process for how the history of art might guide their career development as artists. Critical Thinking is a key component to this process of examination and iteration. Above all, I’m hopeful students enrolled in the course, and especially fine arts students, might use ePortfolios to develop new modes of communication that adequately express their academic development and critical thinking skills to a broader audience.
Explain why you chose to integrate ePortfolios? What questions will they address? How will they connect to SLOs and The Profiles?
ePortfolios are a means of guiding students to broaden and practice translatable learned skills that will also provide them with a platform to demonstrate what they have learned and practiced as developing art historians. At each step of the project, they scaffold their art historical competencies along with repetition of tech practice, and leading them to interpreting their art historical knowledge in new outlets and venues.
What expectations did you have going into this experience?
I had no expectations going into this project, aside from working with people I deeply respect and finding new ways to engage students in research projects.
What did you wish to gain from this experience?
Going in, I hoped to learn new teaching methods to better encounter an increasinlgy digitally native generation.
Always caption your artifacts!
Always caption your artifacts!
Explain what you will do during this experience. If you have a Co-PI, introduce/explain that role as well. *If you have a Co-PI, you can share these Google tabs--no need to create a duplicate.
Later, you can return to this area to comment on obstacles, opportunities, and outcomes--then link to your December Progress report and Final Report.
Explain what you learned/valued during this experience.
Several aspects of this experience were valuable and educational for me, as well as the students.
As an instructor, this grant experience really pushed me to re-think the outputs, outcomes, and assignment format for this course. In many ways, Art History Survey courses are taught in a standard way that has changed very little in the last century. This is especially true of the "museum" or "analysis" assignment. Making use of the ePortfolio really helped me to refigure the assignment in a way that provided for clear, manageable parts that included visual components designed for clarity of instruction.
I learned a lot about the ways I conceived of the assignment's utility, both for the course material, as well as extended applications of it in life and work situations. Pedagogically, it was helpful to think through the assignment as I was planing it, using a bit of "design think" to establish areas where the students might have difficulty in content and mechanics.
The students also learned a fair bit, especially about themselves. Anecdotally, many of the students were rather indifferent to the training session provided. Yet, a significant portion of the class had extraordinary difficulty following the basic instructions (provided verbally, textually, and visually) for part 1 of the assignment. This proved to be helpful, as I could help guide them toward success early in the semester. In contrast to a singular assignment, this gave them ample opportunity to turn their early failures into success. Above all, the use of ePortfolios seemed to give them an opportunity to creatively approach the assignment within the general boundsaries of requirements. Many were successful in this sense and their output make it clear that they both enjoyed and developed their understanding of art historical analysis as the semester proceeded.
One thing I will certainly take away is a reminder of the changing nature and method of academic outputs students are accustomed to and are consistently forced to adopt. It is helpful as an instructor to go through that process as well.
Information across the full cohort, including every student that submitted after January 13th, start of semester.
Report disaggregated March 4th, 2026
Information across the full cohort, including every student that submitted after August 25, start of semester.
Grant recipients have been asked to...
Present at a Faculty Learning Community (FLC) or Community of Practice (COP) Zoom for the Grant
Share aspects of their work with peers [department chairs, program cohorts/faculty, department faculty meeting]
Response to a Call for Proposals (CFP) or Consider presenting or publishing locally, nationally, or internationally [optional]
Use the space below to highlight this.
May 8th, 2026 @ 11a.m.
Via Zoom
Colleagues in the Community of Practice
Day/Date
Location
Audience
Day/Date
Location
Audience