World News/Foreign Affairs

Updates from South America

POSTED MARCH 8, 2020

Amnesty International's report on 2019 (link sidebar) says that the year "brought a renewed assault on human rights across much of the Americas".  Political protests, government crackdowns, and aggressive stances against migrants and asylum seekers all contributed.  

This is an update on issues discussed in earlier posts including South American Notes: Bolivia, Brazil, Chile & Colombia (Nov 20) and US-supported Venezuela coup attempt falters: military intervention still "on the table"

BOLIVIA

Evo Morales won re-election to Bolivia's presidency in November 2019 elections.  The O.A.S., which receives 60% of its funding from the US, disputed the results, and Morales was forced to flee the country after the military "suggested" he leave. "Within two weeks, 32 people were killed protesting against the dictatorship that took over after he fled. The dictatorship openly says it will arrest Morales if he returns to Bolivia."  It now turns out that the O.A.S. claims about the election results were clearly false. Fair.org reports:

"Late last month, MIT Election Data and ScienceLab researchers John Curiel and Jack R. Williams published an analysis of the election results in the Washington Post (2/27/20).  The study was commissioned by CEPR to show that its analysis could be independently verified. The MIT researchers concluded that there “is not any statistical evidence of fraud that we can find,” and that “the OAS’s statistical analysis and conclusions would appear deeply flawed.” That’s a scholarly but overly polite way to put it. The OAS repeatedly made statistical claims about Bolivia’s election that were clearly false. In layperson terms, that’s called lying." (fair.org link in sidebar)

BRAZIL

As Brazil's far-right president Jair Bolsonaro prepares to meet with President Trump to discuss, among other issues, the stalled coup attempt against Venezuelan president Maduro, anti-Bolsonaro sentiment is running high in Brazil.  The Guardian reports:

"Jair Bolsonaro’s apparent endorsement of protests designed to cow Brazil’s democratic institutions has sparked outrage across the political spectrum with one lawmaker warning of a return to the dark days of dictatorship if the demonstrations are not opposed.  Hardcore supporters of Brazil’s far-right president are planning nationwide protests on 15 March and have been flooding social media with propaganda videos and fliers attacking members of Congress – and even proposing a return to military rule under Bolsonaro."

CHILE

High school students in Chile are returning to class after their summer break and are leading a resurgence in protests against structural inequality in educational institutions.  Many took to the streets instead of returning to classes, organizing marches and other protest actions throughout the country.  

Chilean women are planning a "million women march" for Sunday March 8, International Women's Day, to protest inequality, social injustice and the high cost of living.  The Guardian reports:

"More than a million women in Chile are preparing to join a massive protest this Sunday to mark International Women’s Day, in a march expected to reignite the wave of social unrest that began four months ago.  Anger over rising metro fares erupted in October into a series of nationwide protests against inequality, social injustice and the high cost of living. Violent clashes between protesters and police have resulted in more than 30 dead, thousands injured and 445 with eye injuries caused by police weapons – leaving 34 people blinded.  After a summer lull, Sunday’s march will be the first mass demonstration since New Year’s Eve. It is expected to be the first of several protests in the run-up to a historic referendum in April, when Chileans will vote on reforming the country’s Pinochet-era constitution."

COLOMBIA

Hundreds of thousands of Colombians took to the streets in marches and national strikes in November and December as anger mounted against right-wing President Iván Duque and his cabinet. The protests were triggered by Duque’s proposed labor reforms and cuts to the pension system, as well as a recent military airstrike against a camp of alleged dissident rebel drug traffickers, which killed eight children.  Al Jazeera reports (12/27/19):

"Colombia's anti-riot police are under increasing pressure over their violent response to protesters taking part in a national strike.  One student has died and dozens of people have suffered eye injuries after being hit by rubber bullets. Opposition congressmen and NGOs in the country are asking for the anti-riot squads to be dismantled. But President Ivan Duque announced they will be reinforced."

VENEZUELA  

Venezuela will be subjected to a renewed round of "maximum pressure" as Trump meets with far-right Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro.   The discussions between the two right-wing leaders of the largest nations in the Western Hemisphere are the latest attempt to force President Nicolás Maduro from power.  Venezuleanalysis.com reports on Foreign Minister Jorge Arreaza's comments to the UN Human Rights Commission in late February as Trump threatened additional sanctions:

"Venezuelan Foreign Minister Jorge Arreaza denounced US sanctions at the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC)...Speaking at the 43rd Session of the UNHRC in Geneva, Arreaza described the measures from the US Treasury Department as “economic terrorism.”  “It is down to the UN and the UNHRC to lead urgent humanitarian efforts against the massive human rights violations that these sanctions represent,” he said.  The top diplomat stated that Washington has imposed over 300 unilateral measures since 2014, which he claimed has cost the South American nation an estimated US $120 billion. Caracas has recently submitted a lawsuit against the US at the International Criminal Court, arguing that sanctions constitute a “crime against humanity.”

In the year since opposition leader Juan Guaido declared himself president and immediately received support from 50 countries, Maduro has consolidated his power .   Al Jazeera reports:

"President Nicolas Maduro appears to have an even tighter grip on his control as the opposition continues to fracture. And Guaido, struggling to maintain support at home amid the country's deepening economic crisis, faces more challenges ahead, analysts say. "The opposition has lost its influence in the country," said Ronal Rodriguez, a professor and researcher at the Venezuelan Observatory, a think-tank at the University of Rosario in Colombia.  "The situation has changed, and people have started to leave the politics behind, and have instead focused on the day-to-day problems," he told Al Jazeera. "The passion and enthusiasm that Guaido awoke has started to fade."

The Trump-Bolsonaro meeting hopes to reverse that trend, with what degree of damage to Venezuela still to be determined.

In other news...

POSTED APRIL 4, 2020

As the nations of the world confront the biggest global crisis since World War II, climate change deniers, deregulation proponents, and neocons here at home have been busy implementing their reactionary and hawkish agendas.   

On March 30, Slate summarized Administration actions using the coronavirus to achieve  long sought-after items on the right-wing's wish list ((link in sidebar).  Among these actions and announcements were the EPA relaxing environmental rules for power plants and factories, several provisions in the stimulus bill reducing regulations on the banking sector including a provision delaying accounting rules that would require banks to more accurately report their liabilities,  the Labor Department suspending affirmative action rules for a time, and the HHS using the pandemic as an excuse to hastily deport immigrant children apprehended alone at the southern border.

And Trump wasn't done yet.  On April 2, Vox reported: "President Trump’s new fuel economy standards...replace the Obama administration’s standards, which would have pushed the US auto fleet to an average efficiency of 54.5 mpg by 2025, with standards that would reach only 40 mpg (a goal the industry expects to exceed even without a rule). By the Trump administration’s calculations, the change will result in almost a billion more tons of greenhouse gases emitted over the next five years."

As to why Trump was so late to invoke the Defense Production Act, Judd Legum at Popular Information reports on the Chamber of Commerce's lobbying against it and referencing a story in  the New York Times  that the Chamber persuaded Trump’s son-in-law and top economic adviser that using the Defense Production Act was a bad idea. 

Meanwhile, Trump and Pompeo have increased the threats against Venezuela and Iran as hawks and neocons pursue regime change in those countries.  

Besides the new sanctions placed on Iran in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic,  Trump has threatened military action against Teheran for the actions of Iraqi militia.  Juan Cole at Informed Comment writes (link in sidebar): 

The NYT reports that [Trump] is having his Pentagon plan a violent campaign of extermination against the Brigades of the Party of God (Kata’ib Hizbullah), whose leader Trump blew away on January 3 along with Iranian general Qasim Soleimani. Even the top US commander in Iraq, Lt. Gen. Robert P. White, wrote a frank letter warning against such a course of action...In its attacks on the Brigades of the Party of God in late December and since, the US has alienated much of Shiite Iraq against itself. In January Parliament voted a binding act requiring the prime minister to find a way to move US troops out of the country... the PMF are Iraqi forces whom many Iraqis see as national heroes for their role in defeating ISIL (at a time when the US-built Iraqi Army had collapsed)...There is no evidence that they are attacking bases where US soldiers are stationed because Iran told them to. 

Another country suffering from US sanctions in the midst of the pandemic is Venezuela.  A US-supported right-wing coup attempt failed to remove Venezuela's socialist president Maduro.  The sanctions, while wreaking havoc with the Venezuealan economy, have not caused Maduro to resign.  As support dwindles for right-wing opposition leader Juan Guaidó, Trump and Pompeo have come up more ploys to try to force President Maduro from office.   Over the past week,

No halt to the cruelty, injustice and threats

POSTED APRIL 25, 2020                                                                                                                                                                  (4 min read)

Consumed with the COVID-19 pandemic, we may have missed the recent and continuing cruelties of Trump's foreign policy.  As devastating to a progressive and civil society as his domestic policies and rhetoric are, Trump's foreign policy and disdain for international law pose an even greater threat to a humanitarian, just and peaceful world.  

From his first days in office, Trump exhibited a profound animus for much of the world - particularly those parts that were not "white".  In time, he gradually destroyed what little progress his predecessor had made in making the world safer and more humane.  Diplomacy apparently had no place in Trump's State Department: almost half of the top-level jobs in the State Department were still empty almost two years into the administration. The current Secretary of State is Trump loyalist and neocon, Mike Pompeo, his former CIA director.  Pompeo's disdain for international law and the truth rivals that of his boss, and his style has been accurately described by a UK Guardian journalist as one of "unthinking bellicosity."  

In the long list of Trump's antagonistic foreign policy actions, a number stand out as paradigms and harbingers:

One week into his Administration, Trump issues his first Muslim ban.  

Though Muslim Ban 1.0 was struck down by the courts, Trump eventually got his ban with the third version - approved in September by the conservative majority on the Supreme Court.

Four months in, Trump withdraws from the Paris Climate Accords. (June 1, 2017)

The United States remains the only country not in the agreement. This was the first of many withdrawals from international agreements.

Approaching the one year mark (January 2018), Trump effectively proclaims the end of the two-state solution for the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.  

The  US planned to move its embassy to Jerusalem in violation of all previous discussions and agreements.  When that did not go over well with the Palestinians and the rest of the world community, Trump cut half of the US funding to UNRWA, the agency charged with protecting the well-being of stateless Palestinian refugees, one of the most marginalized peoples on the planet.  Later that year, Trump would totally eliminate all US funding to the UNRWA and in February 2019, all direct US aid to Palestinians.  

February 2018 Trump Administration's Nuclear Posture Review recommends new types of nuclear weapons and expanded circumstances in which they could be used 

Trump's reckless nuclear weapons policy - which included the withdrawal from INF Treaty with Russia and from the JCPOA with Iran - is a primary reason the "Doomsday Clock" of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists is now at 100 seconds to midnight - the closest it's ever been since the clock's creation in 1947. (link in sidebar)

May 2018 The United States unilaterally and without cause withdraws from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (Iran Nuclear Deal) and announces re-imposition of severe sanctions on Iran in violation of that agreement.

Everything that happens afterwards in US-Iran relations is explained by this massive betrayal of international trust.  Iran waited a year to see if any workarounds for the brutal sanctions could be found before incrementally rebuilding its nuclear energy program.  

May 2018 The Unites States withdraws from the United Nations Human Rights Council

That body had recommended an investigation into the massacre of unarmed Palestinians demonstrating at the Gaza-Israel border for the right of return and against the US embassy move.  

November 2018 National Security Adviser John Bolton "troika of tyranny" speech

 The speech ushers in a new era of US relations with Latin America and portends a massive escalation in US foreign policy: one where America is trying to dictate how three sovereign countries (Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua) should operate. 

Since the beginning of this year, with the global community confronting its greatest crisis since World War II, there has been no let up in the Administration's cruelty, injustice and threats.   

A partial listing of these actions in the foreign policy area:

January 3 - Iranian Major-General Qassem Soleimani, head of the elite Quds Force, and Iraqi militia commander Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis are killed in a Trump-ordered air strike on their convoy at Baghdad airport 

January 5 - Iraq's parliament passes a resolution calling on the government to expel foreign troops from the country following the killing of a top Iranian military commander and Iraqi armed group leader in a US strike in Baghdad. 

January 10 - Trump refuses Iraqi parliament request to remove US forces and threatens Iraq with sanctions

January 28 - Trump/Kushner peace plan for Palestine & Israel is announced and is promptly rejected by the Palestinians (Jan 28) and the Arab League (Feb 1) (see above link in sidebar)

January 31 - Trump extends travel ban to six African nations 

Feb 4 -Under Secretary of Defense John Rood announces the deployment of the "W76-2 low-yield submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) warhead,”  The introduction of the W76-2 nuclear warhead was the result of Pentagon planning for a potential first strike scenario against adversaries, especially Iran.

Feb 9 - Trump’s budget proposal slashes foreign aid by 21% - seeking $44.1 billion in the upcoming fiscal year, compared with $55.7 billion enacted in fiscal 2020 

March 21 - With the US effectively blocking bilateral medical aid to Iran and Iran's request for a $5bn loan from the International Monetary Fund,  Sec of State Pompeo announces an increase in the sanctions on Iran displaying "callous disregard for Iran’s Covid-19 emergency "

March 26 - US cuts humanitarian aid to Houthi-controlled areas in Yemen UPDATE (May 6): The United States announced it would provide $225m in emergency aid to Yemen to support food programmes, and called on the Houthis to do more to allow aid operations to operate "independently and neutrally".

March 26 - DOJ announces $15 million reward for information leading to arrest of the Venezuelan president, Nicolas Maduro

April 1 - Trump threatens Iran for actions of Iraqi Shi'ite militia 

April 3 - Announces U.S. Navy ships are being deployed to the waters near Venezuela

April 15 - US ends aid to the World Health Organization as the greatest pandemic in a century assaults the planet

April 22 - Trump threatens to "shoot down" (sic) tiny Iranian skiffs on naval maneuvers (see above link in sidebar)

Mid-month Rundown (May 2020)

POSTED MAY 14, 2020

A summary of a few stories from the past couple of weeks.

May 3 - An attempted coup against Venezuelan President Maduro, orchestrated by a retired Venezuelan general and the founder of an American private security company, was foiled.  Beginning on May 1, nearly 60 Venezuelans and two former US Green Berets tried to enter the northern tip of Venezuela in two fishing boats.  Maduro’s forces killed eight Venezuelan members of the raiding team and arrested another 13 members, including the two American veterans.  The Trump Administration's harsh sanctions against Venezuela and $15 million reward for the arrest of Maduro set the context "because it creates the conditions for a attempted violent, unconstitutional regime change in Venezuela. [link below right]

May 7 - The Department of Justice officially moved to drop charges against Trump's former national security adviser Michael Flynn.  Flynn’s indictment was one of the first major acts of Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller’s investigation into the Trump campaign and Russia, as Flynn was charged with lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russia.  Reaction included an open letter from nearly 2000 former Justice Department and FBI officials calling the action "extraordinarily rare, if not unprecedented."  The letter calls on Barr to resign and encourages Congress to formally censure Barr over "his repeated assaults on the rule of law in doing the President’s personal bidding rather than acting in the public interest."

May 7 - A set of detailed documents created by the nation's top disease investigators at the CDC meant to give step-by-step advice to local leaders deciding when and how to reopen public places such as mass transit, day care centers and restaurants during the still-raging pandemic has been shelved by the Trump administration.  Update:  A leaked copy of the CDC guidelines is available and school superintendents, among others, will be using them rather than the "underwhelming" guidelines officially released by the White House.

May 8 - The US blocked a vote on a UN security council resolution calling for a global ceasefire during the Covid-19 pandemic, because the Trump administration objected to an indirect reference to the World Health Organization.

May 11 - The largest study of the antiviral hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 patients was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. The study found that there "were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality between patients who received hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin and patients who received neither drug." The study found that the use of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin together was associated with "significantly elevated levels of cardiac arrest.”  Trump & Fox had hyped hydroxychloroquine  until an earlier study conducted in VA hospitals found more deaths among those treated with hydroxychloroquine than those treated with standard care

May 13 - In its latest nose-thumbing of international law, the Trump Administration, in the person of Mike Pompeo, went to Israel to "bless" the annexationist coalition government being formed by indicted prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu and his new partner, Gen. Benny Gantz.  [link below left] Israel has declared its intention to annex its illegal settlements in the West Bank in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention and numerous UN resolutions

Mid-month rundown: world news

POSTED JUNE 16, 2020

A summary of some events and stories from the past couple of weeks.

May 28 - Protests against racism in the wake of the killing of George Floyd were staged internationally for the first time with a solidarity demonstration outside the United States Embassy in London.   The demonstrations spread across the world in the ensuing days. (Sidebar)

June 8 - Russia rejected the US call for a permanent arms embargo on Iran.  "Russia’s foreign minister is accusing the Trump administration of unleashing a politically motivated campaign against Iran and is calling for “universal condemnation” of the U.S. attempt to get the U.N. Security Council to impose a permanent arms embargo against the Islamic Republic.  Sergey Lavrov said the United States withdrew from the 2015 nuclear agreement between Iran and six major powers and now has no legal right to try to use the U.N. resolution endorsing the deal to indefinitely continue the arms embargo." (AP)

World Bank press release of June 8: "The swift and massive shock of the coronavirus pandemic and shutdown measures to contain it have plunged the global economy into a severe contraction. According to World Bank forecasts, the global economy will shrink by 5.2% this year.  That would represent the deepest recession since the Second World War, with the largest fraction of economies experiencing declines in per capita output since 1870."

June 11 - As Israel continues with its plans for the illegal annexation of 1/3 of the West Bank, the European Court of Human Rights struck down an earlier French court decision and upheld the right of European citizens to boycott Israel.  The Court said the French court's action had “no relevant and sufficient grounds,” and ordered the French government to pay over $100,000 in damages to the defendants. Since the decision affects all 27 EU member states, it is "a huge defeat for the Israeli far right, and a big victory in Europe for freedom of speech." (Informed Comment)

June 15 - The six-week coronavirus  truce in Yemen expired.  The war and the world's greatest humanitarian crisis continue.  An airstrike from the Saudi-led coalition struck a vehicle carrying civilians in northern Yemen on Monday, killing 13 people, including four children, according to the Houthi rebels. “This tragedy is yet more proof that, even though the war in Yemen has dropped off the radar of many people, it is still far from over,” said Xavier Joubert, Yemen’s country director for Save the Children. (AP)

As of June 16, the world's coronavirus death toll stood at 436,000 with over 8 million confirmed cases.  The UK Guardian  is regularly updating its coronavirus world map based on data from Johns Hopkins University.

From Al Jazeera, June 15:


Climate Crisis Update

POSTED JULY 27, 2020

While the coronavirus has temporarily reduced the amount of carbon being poured into the air, global warming and its associated events continue apace.  Here are some recent headlines from around the world and some context on the implications.

Headlines

New research finds the record-breaking heat wave in Siberia is directly linked to greenhouse gas emissions from human activity.  (Democracy Now!, Jul 17) Temperatures in parts of the Arctic Circle in northern Russia topped 86 degrees Fahrenheit in June — continuing a record-breaking heat wave that began in May. Climate data show that May was the planet’s warmestever recorded.  

Context

There are 400 billion tons of methane locked in the arctic permafrost.  Methane is an even more powerful greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide.  As the permafrost melts, this gas is released and contributes to an ever-increasing rate of global warming.  If all the methane trapped in the permafrost were released, it would lead to a runaway increase in global temperatures.

Bubbles of methane emerge from sediments below a frozen Alaskan lake. Photo: Josh Haner/The New York Times 

Amazon wildfires are the worst in 13 years.  (Asia Times, July 9) - Forest fires in Brazil increased by 19.5% in June, the beginning of the dry season, compared to the same month last year, making it the worst June in 13 years, authorities revealed.  Deforestation in Brazil was very high this year before the dry season even began, with more than 2,000 square kilometers lost between January and May, a 34% increase on the same period in 2019 

Development of the Amazon has increased under Brazil's far-right president and climate skeptic Jair Bolsonaro. While climate change endangers the Amazon, bringing hotter weather and longer droughts, another human-induced change- development  - may be the greatest threat facing the rainforest.  Many of these Amazonian wildfires are started as loggers and cattle ranchers use a “slash and burn” method to clear land. Feeding off very dry conditions, fires have spread out of control. 

AFP photo of 2019 Amazon wildfire

Germany becomes first major economy to plan phase-out of both coal and nuclear energy (LA Times, July 3) - German lawmakers have finalized the country’s phase-out of coal as an energy source.  Bills approved by both houses of the German parliament envision shutting down the last coal-fired power plant by 2038 and spending about 40 billion euros ($45 billion) to help affected regions cope with the transition.  The plan is part of Germany’s “energy transition,” an effort to wean Europe’s biggest economy off planet-warming fossil fuels and generate all of the country’s considerable energy needs from renewable sources. 

Link to Pew Research on US renewable energy and US fuel sources  (right)

Coal produces the most CO2 of any fossil fuel when burned (below).  

Pounds of CO2 emitted per million British thermal units (Btu) of energy for various fuels 

Coal                                                      205.7 to  228.6

Diesel fuel/heating oil                              161.3

Gasoline (without ethanol)                      157.2

Propane                                                        139.0

Natural gas                                                  117.0

Non-sustainable wood burning and peat burning  are even worse than coal.

Federal judge blocks Trump administration's easing of rule on methane emissions (Reuters, July 16) -  A federal judge in California blocked a rollback by the Trump administration of a rule on slashing emissions of the powerful greenhouse gas methane from oil and gas operations on federal and tribal lands.  Methane, an invisible gas, is more efficient in trapping heat than carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas. But it lingers for less time in the atmosphere, so reducing methane emissions could help rein in the worst impacts from climate change and warming. 

Methane levels in the atmosphere have increased significantly since 2008, and these dramatic rises in atmospheric methane are threatening to derail plans to hold global temperature rises to 2C, scientists have warned.  The source of the increase is widely debated, but research published in 2019 concludes that the boom in the US shale gas and oil may have ignited this global spike in methane emissions blamed for accelerating the pace of the climate crisis.

Fracking for shale gas. Photo: Andrew Burton/Getty Images 

Coronavirus protests and politics

POSTED AUGUST 10, 2020

Coronavirus protests are not just a US phenomenon.  The virus is impacting politics around the world.  

-Popular protests criticizing their government's coronavirus response, these demonstrations have grown to include protests against economic problems and corruption. 

-Authoritarian governments have taken advantage of the virus to stifle dissent and entrench their power.  

-Here in the US, with more Covid deaths than any other country, a no-brainer on measures to contain the virus has become politicized as an incompetent administration tries to whitewash its failure and convince people it has the virus under control. 

In countries that have had success against the virus such as Germany, the protests take the form of "Why do we need to continue a lockdown? It's over."  In others, such as Chile, which saw widespread demonstrations in 2019 against inequality, the protests are about the lack of food.  Elsewhere, popular protests against their governments' response to the coronavirus have morphed into  "fury over grievances including economic problems and alleged corruption or incompetence.  Demonstrators have taken to the streets to voice their anger at perceived failures by leaders to rise to the unprecedented challenges heightened by the pandemic." The Mercury News reported on the July demonstrations in Israel, Serbia, Lebanon, and Bulgaria.  

Far-right governments have taken advantage of the crisis to stifle criticism and entrench their power.

"Hungary's parliament has voted to allow Prime Minister Viktor Orbán  to rule by decree indefinitely, in order to combat the coronavirus pandemic, giving the populist leader extra powers to unilaterally enact a series of sweeping measures.  The bill, which has been criticized by international human rights watchdogs, has no specified end date and allows Orban to bypass a number of democratic institutions in his response to the outbreak." (CNN, Mar 30) [More on Viktor Orbán in sidebar]

In response to COVID-19, India's Hindu nationalist Prime Minister Narendra Modi has put the country on lockdown.  "The announcement came as hundreds of people, mostly student activists and working-class Muslim women, were staging a months-long sit-in in New Delhi protesting the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA).  [The CAA] gives immigrants a pathway to citizenship [but excludes Muslims].....During the lockdown, the government has begun indicting and detaining anti-CAA protestors.  The government implicates anyone who was planning and participating in the protests, claiming that these actions were attempts to instigate violence and led to the Delhi riots. As a result, the victims of the violence, who were mainly Muslims taking part in the anti-CAA protests, and activists who are working to help them are now framed as the perpetrators of the violence."  (Peninsula Press, June 18) [More on Narendra Modi in sidebar]

The Philippines "reimposed strict lockdown measures to try to curb its surging [coronavirus] outbreak. The measures came after the government passed sweeping new anti-terror legislation....The reimposed lockdown has plunged many Filipinos into deep crisis, and rights groups warned that new anti-terror legislation, which allows for people to be held for weeks without charge, could be used to target people critical of the government's handling of its pandemic response.  The new law outlines vague offenses like "engaging in acts intended to endanger a person's life," or doing something that's intended to "damage public property" or "interfere with critical infrastructure."  (CBS News, August 7)

Brazil has seen protests against the coronavirus response by its far-right president Jair Bolsonaro go global .  "Protesters in Brazil and around the world gathered to denounce President Jair Bolsonaro's handling of the coronavirus pandemic...The "Stop Bolsonaro" protests were staged online and on the streets in Brazil's main cities and in more than 20 other countries on Sunday, demanding the right-wing leader's resignation and calling him a threat to democracy." (Al Jazeera, June 29)

Here in the United States, social distancing and mask wearing have become politicized. Even as the death toll mounts in states too slow to shutdown and/or too quick to re-open, the protests have not been about the gross mishandling of the crisis by Trump and his Administration.  Rather, protesters, some armed, are demonstrating to protest the lock-down, which they say is an infringement on their freedom.  Egged on by the denier-in-chief , some Trumpies have threatened the lives of those intent on stopping the virus. 

Trump cheered on his supporters to liberate states from lock-down and mask requirements.   He again referred to the armed protesters waving Confederate flags as "very good people"  as Michigan struggled to control the virus.  Gov. Whitman issued a rebuke of the armed protesters who gathered inside the state capitol last week in defiance of statewide lockdown orders, saying the demonstrators embodied some of the “worst racism” of the nation’s history. “Some of the outrageousness of what happened at our capitol depicted some of the worst racism and awful parts of our history in this country.”  (UK Guardian, May 3 sidebar)

Then some of the unhinged that make up Trump's base took it a step farther, causing Michigan to closed its capitol building and cancel its legislative session after online death threats were made against Governor Gretchen Whitmer.  "The protesters ostensibly oppose Whitmer's statewide shutdown orders meant to slow the spread of coronavirus....Facebook groups called for Whitmer to be hanged, lynched, shot, beaten or beheaded..."We haven't had any bloodshed yet, but the populous is counting to three, and yesterday was day two," wrote Dave Meisenheimer in a 385,000-member Facebook group called Michiganders Against Excessive Quarantine. "Next comes the watering the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants." (Newsweek, May 14)

Another person receiving death threats is the nation's foremost expert on infectious diseases, Dr. Anthony Fauci.  Threats against him and his family reached the point where he had to request a security detail.   They have been harassed as a result of his high-profile statements about the coronavirus pandemic.   Fauci has often been at odds with Trump on the threat posed by pandemic and Trump has publicly denounced his statements, calling Fauci an "alarmist."   

Trump's denial of the severity of the outbreak and his blame shifting for his failures border on the delusional.  The US death toll stands at 162,000 and the number of confirmed cases has now exceeded 5 million.  Investigating the failed response of this summer, the Washington Post [sidebar] found "a politics-first, science-second attitude" prevailing in the White House.  The focus was on "how to convince the public that President Trump has the crisis under control, rather than on methodically planning ways to contain it."

The 2020 Nobel Peace Prize Winner

POSTED OCTOBER 14, 2020

October is the time of the Nobel prizes - a time when we celebrate the best of humanity and humanity's greatest discoveries and accomplishments.  Many of the prizes in science or literature acknowledge a decade's or a lifetime's work.  The Peace Prize sometimes reflects a more immediate, near-term accomplishment.  Also in contrast to the other awards, the Nobel Peace Prize is sometimes awarded to organizations.  This year's winner is an organization that intensified its long-standing efforts to relieve hunger during the pandemic 

This year's Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to the United Nations' World Food Programme "for its efforts to combat hunger, for its contribution to bettering conditions for peace in conflict-affected areas and for acting as a driving force in efforts to prevent the use of hunger as a weapon of war and conflict."  Noting that the "coronavirus pandemic has contributed to a strong upsurge in the number of victims of hunger in the world" and that in some countries, "the combination of violent conflict and the pandemic has led to a dramatic rise in the number of people living on the brink of starvation" the Nobel Committee praised the World Food Programme in demonstrating "an impressive ability to intensify its efforts".  The Committee warns that the "world is in danger of experiencing a hunger crisis of inconceivable proportions if the World Food Programme and other food assistance organisations do not receive the financial support they have requested."  

The official website of the Nobel Prize Committee can be found here.  A link to the New York Times summary of the complete list of 2020 Nobel winners is below left.

The Nobel Peace Prize

The Peace Prize was one of the original five established by the Swedish inventor Alfred Nobel in 1901 - the others were in Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine and Literature.  In 1901 the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to two individuals - Jean Henri Dunant of Switzerland, the founder of the Red Cross and initiator of the Geneva Conventions, and Frédéric Passy, for his being one of the founders of the Inter-Parliamentary Union and the main organizer of the first Universal Peace Congress.  

The recipients through the ensuing decades are a veritable who's-who of peacemakers.  There is one notable person, however, that is missing from this list.  Despite having been nominated five times, Mohandas Gandhi never won the Prize. Following his assassination in 1948, the committee considered awarding it to him posthumously but decided against it — and, instead, withheld the Prize that year with the explanation that "there was no suitable living candidate." 

The decade of the 20 aught's saw three Americans honored - former President Jimmy Carter in 2002 "for his decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development"; the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and Albert Arnold Gore Jr in 2007 "for their efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change, and to lay the foundations for measures needed to counteract such change"; and Barack Obama in 2009 "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples."

Organizations as well as individuals can receive the award.  In addition to several United Nations' organizations, the International Red Cross, The Friends Service Council (UK) and the American Friends Service Committee (US), Amnesty International, and Médecins Sans Frontières have been recipients.  

A partial list of previous Nobel Peace Prize laureates

1901 - Jean Henri Dunant (Switzerland) - founder of the Red Cross and initiator of the Geneva Conventions 

1906 - Theodore Roosevelt (USA) - for drawing up the peace treaty in Russo-Japanese War

1917 - International Red Cross

1919 - Woodrow Wilson (USA) - for founding the League of Nations

1922 - Fridtjof Nansen (Norway) - originator of stateless persons passports for refugees 

1929 -  Frank B. Kellogg - for the Briand-Kellogg Pact

1930 - Archbishop Lars Olof Nathan (Jonathan) Söderblom (Sweden) - leader of the ecumenical movement.

1931 - Jane Addams (USA) -international president of the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom

1935 - Carl von Ossietzky (Germany) - pacifist journalist 

1945 -Cordell Hull (USA) - for co-initiating the United Nations

1947 - The Friends Service Council (UK) and The American Friends Service Committee (USA) on behalf of the Religious Society of Friends, better known as the Quakers

1954 - The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

1964 - Martin Luther King, Jr. (USA) - campaigner for civil rights against racial segregation.

1965 - United Nation's Children's Fund (UNICEF)

1977 -Amnesty International, London - for its campaign against torture and for promotion of Universal Declaration of Human Rights

1979 - Mother Theresa (India, Albania) - poverty awareness campaigner (India) 

1983 - Lech Wałęsa (Poland) - founder of Solidarność and campaigner for human rights

1984 - Bishop Desmond Mpilo Tutu (South Africa) - for his work against apartheid

1990 - President Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev (USSR) - "for his leading role in the peace process which today characterizes important parts of the international community"

1991 - Aung San Suu Kyi (Myanmar) - "for her non-violent struggle for democracy and human rights"

1992 - Author Rigoberta Menchú (Guatemala) -"in recognition of her work for social justice and ethno-cultural reconciliation based on respect for the rights of indigenous peoples"

1999 - Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels - "in recognition of the organization's pioneering humanitarian work on several continents"

2002 -Jimmy Carter (USA) - former President of the United States -"for his decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development"

2007 - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and Albert Arnold Gore Jr - "for their efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change, and to lay the foundations for measures needed to counteract such change"

2009 - Barack Obama - "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples"

2010 - Liu Xiaobo - "for his long and non-violent struggle for fundamental human rights in China"

2014 - Malala Yousafzai (Pakistan) and Kailash Satyarthi (India) - "for their struggle against the suppression of children and young people and for the right of all children to education" 

2016 - Juan Manuel Santos (Colombia) - "for his resolute efforts to bring the country's more than 50-year-long civil war to an end, a war that has cost the lives of at least 220,000 Colombians and displaced close to six million people"

For a complete listing of Nobel Peace Prize winners, click here.

Latin America Update: Ending the Monroe Doctrine

POSTED OCTOBER 25, 2020

The election season is a difficult time to call for just US policies towards Latin America. For every Latinx supporter of humane immigration policies and freedom from external interference in their country's politics, there is another that supports harsh sanctions and embargoes and clamors for regime change in countries like Cuba and Venezuela. Nowhere is this more apparent than in Florida, where well-organized conservative factions have dominated Latino politics for decades.* 

Take, for example, Republican Senator Marco Rubio, who built his political career in Florida on the fiction that his family fled Cuba to escape the Revolution. The facts: Rubio's grandfather fled Cuba during the reign of Fulgencio Batista, the U.S.-backed military dictator of Cuba from 1952 to 1959.  His grandfather, Pedro Victor García, actually moved back to Cuba in the days following Castro’s triumph. When he tried to re-assume his permanent residency in 1962, U.S. immigration officials determined that he had given up his legal status when he moved back to Havana and ordered him to be deported.

For more than a century, the US has intervened in the internal affairs of Latin American nations with only the occasional gesture – such as FDR's “Good Neighbor Policy” and Obama's rapprochement with Cuba - towards acknowledging their rights as sovereign nations.

As Common Dreams notes, “The Trump administration openly calls its Latin America and Caribbean policy the “Monroe Doctrine 2.0.” The Monroe Doctrine - asserting U.S. geopolitical control over the region - served as a pretext for over 100 years of military invasions, support for military dictatorships, the training and financing of security forces involved in mass human rights violations and economic blackmail, among other horrors.”

Ending the Monroe Doctrine

That is why it is so encouraging to see the open letter sent to candidates Biden and Trump in September by 100 organizations working on Latin American and Caribbean issues. The letter urges the next President “to adopt a broad set of reforms to reframe relations with our neighbors to the south....In January 2021, the President of the United States will face a hemisphere that will not only still be reeling from the coronavirus but will also likely be experiencing a deep economic recession. The best way for the United States to help is not by seeking to impose its will, but rather by engaging with the nations of Latin America and the Caribbean as equal partners.”

The recommendations include:

As Latin American and Caribbean nations try to survive the health and economic effects from the pandemic over the next several years, the United States must aid them rather than hinder them. The recommendations in the open letter will go a long way towards accomplishing this.

Latin America Update

The coronavirus is surging in Latin America.

By the end of September, the region accounted for 28 percent of global cases and 34 percent of deaths. One of the reasons the outbreak has been so hard to contain is the high prevalence of contact-intensive work. Nearly half (45 percent) of jobs are in contact-intensive sectors, and only 20 percent of jobs can be performed remotely. Brazil has registered more than 5.3 million cases of the virus since the pandemic began, while the official death toll there has risen to 156,471. Argentina passed the grim million case milestone last week, and three other nations are expected to reach the 1 million case milestone in the coming weeks — Colombia, Mexico and Peru.

The International Monetary Fund predicts a very slow post-pandemic economic recovery across the region.

Economies across Latin America and the Caribbean are forecast to contract as a group by 8.1% this year, with an uneven 2021 bounce at just 3.6%, and most countries are not seen returning to pre-COVID output levels until 2023. "Coming out of the pandemic, we will have a level of economic activity and employment that will be much lower than before, a level of poverty and income distribution that is worse.”

Chile has a referendum on its dictatorship-era constitution on October 25.

On the one-year anniversary of the protests tiggered by increased transportation costs, Chileans have taken to the streets of the capital, Santiago. For the past several weekends, demonstrations have been held against the government, inequality, and police brutality as a postponed referendum on constitutional changes nears. (Merco Press, Oct 12) 

Update 10/26: Chileans overwhelmingly approved the referendum.  Many hope the historic referendum will lead to changes in social and economic inequalities, address police brutality, expand access to education, and Indigenous sovereignty. 

Bolivians return Socialists to power.

In Bolivia, former President Evo Morales’s political party, MAS, is claiming victory in a twice-postponed election. The centrist candidate, former President Carlos Mesa, conceded defeat the day after the election as exit polls show Luis Arce has won over half of the vote, giving him an outright win. If confirmed, it will put the socialist party back in power, putting an end to the far-right government which overthrew Evo Morales in a coup November 2019. Protests have rocked Bolivia for months now, calling out the right-wing government’s use of military and police repression and violence against Indigenous communities. (Democracy Now, Oct 20)

Strangling Venezuela

*Because of Florida's importance as a swing state, Democrats also play to the reactionaries that dominate the Latinx communities there.  Thus, we are treated to scenes like the congressional hearings in August where Elliot Abrams confirmed that the Trump administration is continuing efforts to foment the ouster of President Nicolás Maduro, elected democratically by the Venezuelan people two years ago.  

As lawmakers listened to Abrams' testimony about the deteriorating humanitarian and security situation in Venezuela,  it would be easy to forget that it is the harsh US sanctions that are strangling Venezuela, already reeling from the crash in oil prices and now, like the rest of the world, trying to survive the pandemic.

Since the US began its support of the multiple failed attempts on behalf of Juan Guaido to remove Maduro, only a few progressive voices have been raised in protest against the violation of Venezuela's national sovereignty. In May 2019, Sen. Bernie Sanders said that "the idea that we would intervene militarily in Venezuela is literally unbelievable."  Let's hope so...

It is unlikely that Trump would intervene militarily in Venezuela this close to the elections.  Still the fact that Elliott Abrams is U.S. Special Representative to Venezuela speaks volumes. Abrams is widely remembered in Central America, but particularly from his time in the Reagan administration, when he tried to whitewash a massacre of a thousand men, women and children by US-funded death squads in El Salvador, when he was assistant secretary of state for human rights. Abrams also helped organize the covert financing of Contra rebels in Nicaragua behind the back of Congress, which had cut off funding. He then lied to Congress about his role, twice. He pleaded guilty to both counts in 1991 but was pardoned by George H.W. Bush.

Latin America Update

POSTED DECEMBER 28, 2020

As of July 26, Latin America, the region stretching from Mexico to the Tierra del Fuego, became the region with the most confirmed Covid-19 cases, accounting for one-quarter of the world's total.  Even with the onset of warmer weather in the Southern Hemisphere, the region is experiencing a surge in cases. Health services in Brazil, Mexico and Paraguay are dangerously stretched as a second wave of the pandemic buffets a region where the first never ended.  Brazil's death toll has surpassed 190,ooo, second only to the US.

Since the pandemic's start, Cuba has been sending medical personnel to nations struck by the pandemic in a singular example of an "internationalist" response to the pandemic which has now killed almost 1.8 million people worldwide.  Nearly 40 countries across five continents have received Cuban medics during the pandemic, as the island nation—home to just over 11 million inhabitants—has once more punched far above its weight in medical diplomacy.  Since its 1959 leftist revolution, Cuba has dispatched its “army of white coats” to disaster sites and disease outbreaks around the world in the name of solidarity. In the last decade, they have fought cholera in Haiti and Ebola in West Africa.

The most active Atlantic hurricane season ever recorded devastated Central American countries.  The region, which already has some of the highest poverty rates in Latin America, was particularly hard hit by hurricanes this year.  Two of the year’s strongest storms, Eta and Iota, ravaged swathes of Panama, Costa Rica, Honduras, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala and Belize in unusually quick succession in November.  Altogether, more than 200 people were killed and more than half a million displaced. Hundreds of thousands are now unsure where their next meals will come from.  Climate change experts warn that this is a preview of what may be in store for the region in the future.

Military dictator Gen. Agosto Pinochet's 17 year reign in Chile may have ended in 1990, but the Pinochet-era constitution lived on.  That is about to change. In late October, 78 percent of Chileans voted to replace the current charter written by the far-right autocrat who ruled from 1973 to 1990. after overthrowing the elected president Socialist  Salvador Allende.  Starting in April, a 155-member constitutional assembly — which must feature an equal number of men and women elected by the public — will draft the new constitution by early 2022 and submit it to the nation for approval.

A more recent right-wing power grab - that in Bolivia in November 2019 - was reversed in October elections.  A final official vote gave leftist Luis Arce a smashing victory in Bolivia’s presidential election, a vindication for the Movement Toward Socialism party of ousted President Evo Morales, who was barred from running. Arce won 55% of the votes against six rivals on the ballot, easily avoiding the need for a runoff. The runnerup was centrist former President Carlos Mesa with just under 29%. Conservative Luis Fernando Camacho, one of the leaders of the protest movement that helped drive Morales out of the country a year ago, received only 14% of the vote. (link below right)

U.S. President-elect Joe Biden and Mexico’s President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador committed to work on a humane strategy to regional migration by addressing its root causes in Central America and southern Mexico.  The two leaders “discussed working together on a new approach to regional migration that offers alternatives to undertaking the dangerous journey to the United States” in a Dec 19 phone call. 

In Venezuela, President Nicolás Maduro has claimed victory in parliamentary elections. Turnout was unusually low, at just over 30%, after opposition leader Juan Guaidó called for a boycott of the election.  Maduro is calling on incoming President Joe Biden to abandon the U.S.’s interventionist agenda in Venezuela and drop all sanctions.   Analysts in an Al Jazeera round table (link below left) provide their viewpoints on both sides of the issue.

Protests erupt against Myanmar military coup

POSTED FEBRUARY 9, 2021

It's been 8 days since Myanmar's military staged a coup ending the power-sharing agreement with Aung San Suu Kyi and her National League for Democracy.  The agreement had been in place since 2016.   

Like the coup attempts in the United States and Venezuela, this one was based on election results disputed by the losing side.  Unlike the coup attempts in the United States and Venezuela, this one had the support of the military.  

The coup unfolded hours before lawmakers were to take their seats in the opening of parliament, following a November election in which the military made unsubstantiated claims of election fraud, claims that have been dismissed by the country's election commission.  If this sounds familiar, it's because the same bogus claims of election fraud, all refuted by state electoral commissions and the courts, were used by Donald Trump in his attempted coup.  Suu Kyi said in a statement the military had put Burma — which the military calls Myanmar — back under dictatorship, and urged people to protest.  (Democracy Now!, Feb 1)

Rule #1 for staging a coup to overturn an election result appears to be: "Make sure the military is on your side."  Trump's thugs and crazies were not up to the task here in the United States in their January 6 attack on the Capitol.

Rule #1 for stopping a coup is: "Begin protesting the legitimacy of the coup immediately."  If an anti-coup is to be successful, protests must be organized in a matter of days. 

Suu Kyi's call for protests has been heeded.  "Thousands of people spilled into the streets of Yangon, Myanmar's biggest city, on Saturday, chanting "down with the military dictatorship." The protesters held up three-finger salutes, signs that critics of the coup are growing louder...People from all walks of life are mounting a campaign of civil resistance due to the coup. Some residents have been banging pots and pans at night, and some essential workers like teachers and doctors have refused to work." (CBS, Feb 6 - below left)

In the runup to our own elections, Jeremy Brecher at Common Dreams [below right] discussed the work of theorist and historian of non-violence Gene Sharp on popular resistance to subversion of elections and other forms of coup d’état. His "Waging Nonviolent Struggle" provides many case studies of effective nonviolent resistance; his "The Anti-Coup" focuses in on the use of these methods against illegal seizures of government power. It proposes such guidelines as:

Repudiate the coup and denounce its leaders as illegitimate

Regard all decrees and orders from the coup leaders contradicting established law as illegal and refuse to obey them

Keep all resistance strictly nonviolent – refuse to be provoked into violence

Non-cooperate with the coup leaders in all ways


Myanmar's police and military have begun their crackdown on the protests.  "Police and military forces cracked down on civil protests in Myanmar on Tuesday February 9, using water cannons and rubber bullets on demonstrators that seriously injured at least two...Activists demonstrating against the military coup were injured in the capital Naypyidaw on a third day of youth-led street protests...Local administrators barred people from protesting or gathering in groups of five or more and ordered a curfew, according to Myanmar's Assistance Association for Political Prisoners."  (UPI, Feb 9)

Updates:  

"Large crowds demonstrating against the military takeover in Myanmar again defied a ban on protests Wednesday  Feb 10, even after security forces ratcheted up the use of force against them and raided the headquarters of the political party of ousted leader Aung San Suu Kyi. Witnesses estimated that tens of thousands of protesters, if not more, turned out in Yangon and Mandalay, the country's biggest cities. Rallies also took place in the capital Naypyitaw and elsewhere." (CBS, Feb 10)

"The top United Nations human rights body has called on Myanmar to release Aung San Suu Kyi and other officials and to refrain from using violence on people protesting against the military coup.  The 47-member Geneva forum adopted a resolution brought by Britain and the European Union (EU) unanimously without a vote.  The resolution was adopted after the UN human rights investigator for Myanmar urged the UN Security Council to consider imposing punitive sanctions, arms embargoes and travel bans in response to the coup." (Al Jazeera, Feb 12)

Biden must reverse ALL of Trump's foreign policy fiascos: why the delay?

POSTED MAR 2, 2021

As President Biden attempts to restore America's credibility abroad and have us "lead by the power of our example", his first priority must be cleaning up the wreckage of Trump's foreign policy blunders, cruelties, and violations of international law and agreements.  Biden has taken steps on some "no-brainers" by rejoining agreements and commissions abandoned by Trump - the World Health Organization, the Paris Climate Accords, the UN Human Rights Commission.  Notably, Biden renewed the New START Nuclear Treaty with Russia before it expired.  He has also restored aid to the Palestinians and given notice to Saudi Arabia that it will no longer be business as usual for their intervention in Yemen.  The Biden Administration is considering cancellation of some existing arms deals with the Saudis and, for future arms sales, only providing weapons that are defensive in nature and cannot be used for attacks.

There are a large number of Trump policies, however, that still need to be remedied as soon as possible - policies that demonstrate the US' disdain for international law, punish civilian populations, and exude a distorted American exceptionalism.

Below are some urgently needed actions.  There are no acceptable excuses for delaying the reversal of  these Trump disasters.   Taken in the context of his choices for many of his foreign policy advisers, Biden's hesitancy in addressing these injustices is troubling.  

End the sanctions on members of the International Criminal Court.  The "poster boy" for the disdain that Trump and his henchman Pompeo had for international law is the sanctioning of members of the International Criminal Court.  The Trump administration retaliated against the ICC, the Hague-based court set up to prosecute war crimes and crimes against humanity, for its decision to authorize an investigation into alleged war crimes in Afghanistan, including allegations of torture by U.S. personnel, as well as ongoing investigations of alleged Israeli war crimes in Occupied Palestine territories. [sidebar]

End the illegal sanctions on Venezuela and Iran.  Those on Iran are especially egregious since they result from the United States' violation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.  Sanctions are a form of economic warfare that has punished the civilian populations without any effect on the governing parties.  [sidebar] That they continue to be enforced in a time of pandemic is unconscionable.  

Re-enter the JCPOA.  Trump unilaterally and without cause left the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.  The Trump Administration then imposed illegal sanctions on Iran - the harshest ever on any country during peace time.  The sanctions increased the misery of the Iranian people and totally failed to bring about "changes in Iran's behavior" or regime change.  The situation created by Trump is neither normal nor legal.  Iran's moderate President Hassan Rouhani has said that he is ready to return to compliance [sidebar] - i.e., the agreed levels of uranium enrichment - , as long as the U.S. and the other signatories lift sanctions, on whatever terms or schedule that Biden wants.  On the other hand, Iranian hard-liners may be unwilling to ever trust the United States again after Trump's abandonment of the agreement.  The clock is ticking.  Iran's elections are in June and without an end to the sanctions and the US return to the JCPOA, a victory by Iran's hard-liners is almost a certainty.   

Re-normalize relations with Cuba  Trump unveiled his Cuba policy in 2017, introducing new sanctions and rolling back efforts to normalize relations. By 2019, the Administration had largely abandoned engagement and, from 2019 to January 2021, significantly increased sanctions, piqued by Cuba's refusal to abandon its ally Venezuela.  As a parting outrage, Pompeo declared Cuba a "state sponsor of terrorism" as he was leaving office.  

There is no reality to the designation, which was a politically motivated parting gift to the Cuban exile community and its allies that have been loyal supporters of the Trump administration and helped oust several Democratic members of Congress in the last election. Sanctions have been used for political gain with no regard for the Cuban people who, for four years, have borne the brunt of sanctions affecting everything from energy, tourism, medicines, remittances and flights. [sidebar]

Moving beyond Trump's policies, the United States has imposed an embargo on Cuba since 1961. It is long past time for this harmful and unjustified embargo to be repealed.  

Re-commit to UN resolutions, international law and agreements on Palestinian statehood  Trump's treatment of the Palestinians was abhorrent.  In his four years in office, he added to the misery of one of the most marginalized peoples on the planet and destroyed any hope for a two-state solution.  Cutting off US aid, moving the US embassy to Jerusalem, leaving the UN Human Rights Council after the Israeli massacre of Palestinian protesters, and unilaterally declaring that the Israeli settlements on Palestinian land were not illegal - all indicated that Trump was intent on ending the two-state solution.  If there were any remaining doubt, the Trump-Kuchner "peace plan" put the last nail in the coffin of that long-standing American approach to Israel and Occupied Palestine.

Biden has restored aid to the Palestinians and now must begin to act like an honest broker in the Israel-Palestine peace process.  

Although Biden has said he will not move the US Embassy back to Tel Aviv, he could recognize East Jerusalem as the capital of a future Palestinian state in a return to international law and agreements. Along similar lines, Secretary of State Blinken should declare "null and void" his predecessor's statement on the legality of Israeli settlements o n Palestinian lands.  

One of the most important steps for the Biden Administration to do now is to withdraw its own objection to the ICC decision to investigate alleged war crimes by the Israeli occupation in the Palestinian territories.   Holding Israel accountable for their crimes against the Palestinian people may "finally bring an end to the abuses if the ICC’s decision results in practical steps that pursue offenders committing crimes in previous wars and place them on the international terrorism list." [sidebar] 

World News Briefs

POSTED MAR 12, 2021

Brazil's Supreme Court throws out the corruption convictions against former President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.  "Lula" is credited with lifting millions of Brazilians out of poverty during his his years in office.  He was the front-runner in the 2018 election but was barred from running and imprisoned on what supporters say were trumped-up charges from the Brazilian Right, paving the way for the election of Brazil's current far-right president Jair Bolsonaro.  The convictions against Lula were annulled based on leaked documents of conversations between lead prosecutor Deltan Dallagnol and then-presiding Judge Sergio Moro in which Moro offered strategic advice to prosecutors and passed on tips for new avenues of investigation.  Other chats in the archive raise fundamental questions about the quality of the charges that ultimately sent Lula to prison. Lula is free to run for election in 2022.  He currently holds a double digit lead over Bolsonaro. [sidebar]

Myanmar's deadly crackdown on anti-coup protesters continues.  "At least seven people were killed in Myanmar on Thursday after security forces opened fire on anti-coup protesters, according to witnesses and local media.  The violence comes after the United Nations Security Council called on the military to “exercise utmost restraint” in its response to peaceful demonstrators and rights group Amnesty International accused the military of adopting battlefield tactics against peaceful demonstrators....  Myanmar has been in chaos since its military toppled the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi on February 1. The power grab, just a decade after the end of 49 years of strict military rule, triggered huge protests nationwide. The Assistance Association for Political Prisoners advocacy group said security forces have killed more than 60 protesters and arrested 2,000 others in the ensuing crackdown." (Al Jazeera, Mar 11) [sidebar]

EU backs ICC inquiry into alleged Israeli war crimes.  "The European Union has backed the International Criminal Court (ICC) over its decision to open a formal investigation into war crimes committed in occupied Palestine in comments that appear to rebuke Israel and its key ally the US....The bloc's spokesperson Peter Stano said that, 'The ICC is an independent and impartial judicial institution with no political objectives to pursue"...He reiterated that the EU 'respects the court's independence and impartiality.'  Stano noted that the ICC is 'a court of last resort, a fundamental safety net to help victims achieve justice where this is not possible at the national level, thus where the state concerned is genuinely unwilling or unable to carry out the investigation or the prosecution.' (Middle East Monitor, Mar 8)

China approves plan to veto Hong Kong election candidates.  China’s parliament voted for "changes to Hong Kong’s electoral system including powers to veto candidates, as Beijing moves to establish a 'patriotic' government after huge pro-democracy rallies in the city.  It is a move which critics say will be one of the final nails in the coffin of Hong Kong’s democracy movement...China had committed to giving Hong Kong a degree of autonomy when it reverted from British colonial rule in 1997, a status that has unravelled in recent months." (Al Jazeera, Mar 11)

Myanmar protests continue amidst deadly crackdown

POSTED APRIL 2, 2021

It's been two months since a military coup in Myanmar toppled the elected government of democracy activist Aung San Suu Kyi on the basis of unsubstantiated claims of irregularities in an election that Suu Kyi's party had won in a landslide.  Over 500 people have been killed in protests against the military junta.  Last Saturday, March 27, in what has been called a "day of shame", the junta killed more than 100 protesters.  

The killings have not stopped the protests.  Protesters were back out in several places on Thursday and two more people were killed, according to media reports, as activists burned copies of a military-framed constitution and called for unity among all those opposed to army rule. 

In an attempt to stifle communication about the turmoil, the junta ordered internet service providers to shut down wireless broadband services until further noticeSuu Kyi, three of her deposed cabinet ministers and a detained Australian economic adviser, Sean Turnell, were charged a week ago in a Yangon court under the official secrets law.  Their lawyers say the charges, which carry a 14 year sentence were trumped up. (Reuters, March 31) 

The United States and others, at the urging of UN officials, are imposing ever tighter economic sanctions and severing diplomatic channels. The immediate effect of this pressure will be limited against a regime that is ready to weather international isolation.  The best hope for a political solution may be The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).   ASEAN is a consensus-driven group with a policy of non-interference in the internal affairs of its member states.  It sees its strength as being the ability to keep open lines of communication unavailable to any other multilateral group. The UN Special Envoy for Myanmar has apparently approached ASEAN members for this reason after being denied access to Myanmar. ASEAN governments hope that this ability to continue dialogue will eventually coax Myanmar’s military back into a democratic process.   To succeed, ASEAN will have to engage both the junta and Suu Kyi's party, but neither party appears ready to engage in this dialogue at this time.  (CSIS, April 1)

The BBC summarizes the situation in the link below.

World News Briefs

POSTED APRIL 30, 2021

Iran

Myanmar  

NPR (Apr 24): Leaders of nine Southeast Asian countries called for an immediate end to the violence in Myanmar, where the military government has cracked down violently on the enormous protests over its February coup.  At least 748 people have been killed and 3,389 are being detained, according to the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners.   The official statement released Saturday April 24 by ASEAN leaders makes five demands of the military junta, including an "immediate cessation" of the violence and a peaceful solution to the situation via "constructive dialogue," mediated by a special envoy appointed by ASEAN. The leaders also demanded that Myanmar's military government allow the arrival of humanitarian assistance.  In Myanmar, protests have mostly quieted in recent weeks due to the crackdowns

Reuters (Apr 27) reports on other developments: The junta has declined to accept the ASEAN proposals, saying it would consider them "when the situation returns to stability" and provided the recommendations facilitated the military's own roadmap...Myanmar authorities are seeking to file charges of murder and treason against one of the main leaders of the protest campaign against military rule according to the state broadcaster...Myanmar's pro-democracy unity government, formed to oppose the junta, ruled out talks on the crisis until all political prisoners are released...Fighting has intensified between the military and ethnic minority Karen insurgents in the east with more air strikes sending villagers fleeing into neighboring Thailand.

India

India has become the epicenter of the pandemic.  The surge in Covid-19 cases that began in mid-March is overwhelming India's healthcare systems.  There have been 350,000 cases per day over the past week and total confirmed deaths is now over 200,000.  India thought it had weathered the worst of the pandemic last year, but the virus is now racing through its population and systems are beginning to collapse.  Hospitalizations and deaths have reached record highs, overwhelming health-care workers. Patients are suffocating because hospitals' oxygen supplies have run out.  A number of countries including the United States are providing critical medical supplies, vaccines, oxygen and other life-saving assistance.  India's deadly Covid-19 second wave has devastated big cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Lucknow and Pune. Hospitals and crematoriums have run out of space, and funerals are taking place in car parks. But the pandemic has now firmly gripped many smaller cities, towns and villages where the devastation is largely under-reported.

The variants causing the surge are worrying epidemiologists; Time explains: "Scientists believe that the variants of SARS-CoV-2 responsible for this second wave of cases in India already include at least two mutations that make them more dangerous. These mutations are already familiar to COVID-19 experts. One is found in a variant first identified in South Africa, while the other is part of a variant believed to have emerged from California. Researchers believe that these two mutations may, respectively, make it easier for the virus to infect human cells, and to evade the protection provided by immune cells like antibodies."

Ethiopia

The conflict in the Tigray region of Ethiopia between government forces and the Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF) is approaching the six-month mark.  Government forces have been aided by troops from neighboring Eritrea as well as regional police and gendarmerie forces of the neighboring Amhara and Afar Regions.  Claims of rapes, massacres and ethnic cleansing have been made.  A serious humanitarian crisis is threatening the people of the region as refugees flee into neighboring Sudan and famine looms for the people of Tigray.   Fighting had disrupted the harvest in a region that was already food insecure.  The interim government estimates that some 4.5 million people now need food assistance. The UN warns, "Further deterioration is expected as the conflict continues and disrupts the next planting season." (AFP, Apr 30)

The government of Nobel Peace Prize winner Abiy Ahmed has swept up thousands of ethnic Tigrayans into detention centers across the country, on accusations that they are traitors, often holding them for months without charges. (Associated Press, link right)

A "Trump-lite" foreign policy is unacceptable

POSTED JUNE 3, 2021

President Biden's foreign policy and defense budget are failing progressives and peace activists.  Biden's proposed increase to an already obscenely bloated defense budget and his failure to quickly reverse all of Trump's odious policies are warning signs of a same-old, same-old status quo approach to  foreign affairs.  Just as Lyndon Johnson's Vietnam War became Richard Nixon's Vietnam War more than 50 years ago, Biden will own Trump's policies if he does not abandon them soon.  

Some of the areas where the President is falling down:

To his credit, Biden has reversed some of Trump's most egregious actions.  But he has given no indication that he will transform US foreign policy in any significant way.  Instead, we are witnessing what Win Without War calls "a slow accumulation of failures to use presidential leadership" to end the failed policies of the past.

Notes: 

*Between 2016 and 2020, the United States "accounted for 37 percent of total international weapons deliveries, nearly twice the level of its closest rival, Russia, and more than six times that of Washington’s threat du jour, China...The United States has held that top spot for 28 of the past 30 years, posting massive sales numbers regardless of which party held power in the White House or Congress." [1]

**Over the past two decades, the United States has provided Israel with $63 billion in security assistance, more than 90 percent of it through the State Department’s Foreign Military Financing, which provides funds to buy US weaponry. [1]

References: [1] The Nation, May 27 [2] Washington Post, May 17  [3] Reuters, June 1 [4] China Daily, May 5

World News Update

POSTED JUNE 18, 2021

Ethiopia [1,2,3]

Ethiopia's twice-delayed national elections will begin June 21 against the backdrop of numerous crises including, most notably, the conflict in the Tigray region. Raising concerns that the election would not be free, fair, and credible, opposition parties are calling for a postponement. They say that the government should instead focus its efforts on convening an inclusive national dialogue to build a national consensus on the future of the country.  

The crisis in Tigray has now reached “a tipping point” with famine threatening the region. U.N. Emergency Relief Coordinator Mark Lowcock told the UN Security Council and put the blame squarely on forces from the neighboring nation of Eritrea. "Eritrean soldiers are using starvation as a weapon of war," he said.

The fighting which began in November has led to a humanitarian crisis with more than 60,000 people fleeing across the border into Sudan and hundreds of thousands of others forced from their homes. Massacres of civilians have been recorded as well as sexual violence. More than 350,000 people are said to be living in famine conditions, according to one assessment. Overall, the UN estimates that more than five million people need humanitarian assistance.

Colombia [4,5,6]

Protests against the right-wing government of Iván Duque Márquez have raged across Colombia for nearly two months.  What started as a protest against a tax hike morphed into protests against the inequalities that have plagued Colombia for decades.  The initially peaceful protests turned violent after a brutal response by the police.  

On June 15, the protest leaders said that they will stop organizing marches in the country’s largest cities following seven weeks of antigovernment demonstrations that have resulted in at least 50 deaths. Members of the National Strike Committee — a group made up of unions and student organizations — said at a news conference that they will suspend marches to prevent more deaths of protesters at the hands of police and also to slow down coronavirus contagion in Colombia, where deaths from the virus are at an all-time high. The changed strategy will focus on meeting with civil society organizations to draft legislation that will be presented to Colombia’s congress in July, following a large march on the nation’s capital.

The protests were preceded by the murder of left-leaning social leaders – assassinations likely carried out by right-wing paramilitary groups.  These killings are continuing – including one earlier this month of José Alonso, a signatory of the 2016 Peace Accord between the Colombian state and the then Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC).  

Solidarity rallies have been held in New York, Berlin and other cities as social media overflows with messages of support and videos of police brutality and murder. Yet despite the widespread indignation, the US government has remained relatively silent on the state violence being committed by one of their closest allies in Latin America.

The utter hypocrisy of the United States is once again on display.  The preferential treatment the US gives its allies in the region could not be more clear: with any unrest just across the border in Venezuela, Washington is quick to deliver debilitating sanctions and threaten military action.  When human rights are violated in Colombia, we are treated to non-answers about the killing of protesters like this from Biden's press secretary in a briefing in May: “I’ll have to ask our national security team on the latest engagement we’ve had with the Colombian government and others on that, and I will get back to you with a comment”...and to absurdities like the press release from the US Embassy in Colombia.  After affirming the rights of protesters, it goes on to offer support to the Colombian government and puts trust in the Colombia police to “address any violations of human rights.”   

Israel/Occupied Palestine [7, 8, 9]

The record 12-year reign of Benjamin Netanyahu as Prime Minister of Israel is over after its parliament voted in a new coalition government. Right-wing nationalist Naftali Bennett has been sworn in as prime minister, leading a "government of change". He will lead an unprecedented coalition of parties, which for the first time includes an Arab political party. The new government was approved with a razor-thin majority of 60-59.

Netanyahu did not go quietly. As a parting shot to the Palestinians' quest for a homeland, Netanyahu authorized an ultra-nationalist “Flag March” through Jerusalem over the objections of his Defense Minister. The Israeli squatters’ deliberately provocative march on June 15 went through Palestinian neighborhoods, and 33 Palestinians were injured during confrontations with the Israeli Occupation authorities in the area of the Old City in occupied Jerusalem, one of them by live fire, and at least 17 were jailed.

An estimated 5,000 Israelis, primarily youth belonging to far-right and ultra-nationalist groups, participated in the parade, which is held every year in commemoration of Israel’s occupation of the city in 1967. Basically, the squatters are rubbing the occupied population’s noses in their life of defeat and ongoing humiliation.

Outside the Damascus Gate, the entrance to the Muslim quarter of the Old City, crowds of Israelis danced, waved Israeli flags, and chanted racist slogans. Among the chants that were reported were “Death to Arabs,” “may your village burn,” and “a second Nakba is coming,” referring to the nakba, or ‘catastrophe’ in Arabic, when thousands of Palestinians were massacred by Zionist militias and over 750,000 were forcibly expelled from their homes in 1948.

It's hard to see how things could be much worse for Palestinians than they were under Netanyahu, who told an Israeli radio station in 2019 that "a Palestinian state will not be created, not like the one people are talking about. It won't happen."  But, for the most part, Palestinians do not see much of a change in their situation coming with the new government.  The Occupation and Israel's apartheid laws continue, the illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem make a Palestinian homeland less and less viable, and the blockaded, destitute Gaza Strip remains "the world's largest outdoor prison."  

Hypocrisy in action

POSTED JULY 23, 2021

Nowhere is the hypocrisy of America's foreign policy more evident than in the contrasting cases of Cuba and Israel.  Nowhere has mainstream media bias and the power of lobbies been more detrimental to Americans' understanding the realities of the respective situations.  The recent US reaction to the Cuban government's response to protests there compared to its reaction to Israel's response to Palestinian protests illustrates the point.

Earlier this month, anti-government protesters took to the streets in cities across Cuba.  Despite being limited in size and immediately met by substantial counter-demonstrations, corporate media were keen to present the actions as widespread and momentous.  So intent to present the anti-government protests as massive, a host of media outlets across the political spectrum resorted to using images of pro-government demonstrations to illustrate how large and impressive the anti-government movement was. [1]

The protests erupted amid Cuba's worst economic crisis since the fall of the Soviet Union, a surge in coronavirus infections, with people voicing anger over shortages of basic goods, curbs on civil liberties and the authorities' handling of the pandemic.  What few media outlets reminded their readers of was that much of this can be laid at the feet of the United States' brutal embargo against the small island nation since the early 1960's and the Trump sanctions that are still in effect six months into the Biden presidency.

Official documents going back to 1960 note that, by “denying money and supplies to Cuba,” the US hopes to “decrease monetary and real wages, to bring about hunger, desperation and [the] overthrow of [the] government.” [1, 2]  On June 23, for the 29th year in a row, the UN General Assembly on June 23 voted overwhelmingly to condemn the embargo.  Only the US and Israel opposed the resolution, which passed 184-2 with 3 abstentions.

The Trump administration expanded the economic war against Cuba, strangling the island with more than 200 sanctions.  During the pandemic, these sanctions escalated, hindering Cuba’s response to COVID.  Even now, as COVID cases in Cuba rise to their highest levels since the pandemic began, Joe Biden has done nothing to lift the sanctions. His response to the protests, of course, did not mention either the embargo or the sanctions.  U.S. sanctions, intensified during the Trump administration, triggered Cuba’s economic crisis.  But the protesters took their anger out on the Cuban government. [3]

The protests have died down but on Thursday Biden imposed sanctions on the Cuban security minister and an interior ministry brigade for the arrests of protesters.  Calling Cuba a failed state, Biden failed to acknowledge the role the US has played in bringing about the current situation.  [sidebar]

Biden did not do well in South Florida where "anti-Castro" Cubans hold a powerful sway over the voters.  If the President thinks he is going to gain their votes, he is going to be rudely surprised.  Nothing short of military action is likely to satisfy them.

Now, compare this to the US reaction to the massacre of more than 100 Palestinian protesters by Israeli Defense Forces in the spring of 2018: when the U.N. General Assembly voted 120 to 8 to condemn Israel over its killing of Palestinians protesting against Israel's occupation, Trump withdrew the United States from the UN Human Rights Council. 

Oh, but that was Trump, you say.  Well fast forward to earlier this year.  The Israeli plan to evict 169 Palestinians from their homes in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of East Jerusalem had made this Ramadan particularly tense and fomented protests there.  When the protesters were attacked by Israeli security forces, they went to the area of the al-Aqsa Mosque, the third holiest mosque in the Islamic world, perhaps expecting that it would be treated as a sanctuary by the Israelis.  They were wrong.  The Israeli police attacked them in the mosque, and more than 160 Palestinians were injured.  [video in sidebar]

The US State Department limited its comments to being “extremely concerned” about the violence in Jerusalem and called on Israeli and Palestinian officials “to act decisively” to deescalate tensions.  That didn't happen.  Instead the situation spiralled out of control with 248 Palestinians and 12 Israelis dead by the time it was over.  While preventing the Security Council from issuing a statement or intervening,  Biden took 11 days to get Netanyahu to stop Israel's totally disproportionate response against Gaza.

Just this past weekend, there was yet another incident at this sensitive venue.   Al Jazeera reports

"Palestinians have condemned the storming of the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound on Sunday by Israeli police, which then launched tear gas and rubber-coated steel bullets at worshippers at Islam’s third holiest site in occupied East Jerusalem, according to Palestinian media.  Israeli police forcefully evacuated Muslim worshippers to clear the way for the Jewish visitors."

The pro-Israel lobby is the most powerful foreign lobby operating in our country.  It has been remarkably successful in changing a narrative of apartheid oppression, human rights violations and ethnic cleansing into one that paints Israel as a weak underdog in the Middle East surrounded by Arab nations.  Since its creation, Israel has received more US aid than any other nation and has built up one of the most powerful defense forces in the world.  Some in Congress are finally beginning to question whether the uses to which Israel puts our tax dollars are in line with our stated values.  The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace called for close tracking and monitoring of Israel's weapons use to  ensure that Israel, the largest recipient of U.S. security assistance, complies with federal laws and international human rights standards. [4]   Several pro-Israel organizations such as Americans for Peace Now** go even further -  arguing that military aid for Israel must be conditional, for the good of both the United States and Israel and "because it's the right thing." [sidebar

Notes: 

*Through FY2020, the United States has provided Israel with $146 billion in military, economic, and missile defense funding. Adjusted for inflation, this amount is equivalent to $236 billion in 2018 dollars, making Israel the largest cumulative recipient of U.S. assistance since World War II. [4]

**Peace Now is the largest and longest-standing Israeli movement advocating for peace and the two-state solution "through public pressure".  Americans for Peace Now is the American "sister organization" to the Israeli movement.

References: [1] Common Dreams [2] Reuters  [3] Democracy Now! [4] Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

World News Briefs

POSTED AUGUST 6, 2021

Ethiopia [1, 2]

There are 80 ethnolinguistic groups in Ethiopia, Africa's second most populous nation.  As the conflict in the northern Tigray region escalates, there are increasing concerns about the nation's unity.  The nine-month-long war between Tigrayan rebel forces and the Ethiopian army and its allies has been mostly contained in Tigray itself. But now the fighting is spreading into the neighboring regions of Amhara and Afar.  The Tigrayan forces have said they will not stop fighting until a number of conditions have been met by Ethiopia's Prime Minister Abiy. This includes the end of the federal government's blockade of Tigray and the withdrawal of all opposing troops - the Ethiopian army, forces from other Ethiopian regions and the Eritreans fighting alongside them.

The conflict has caused a massive humanitarian crisis. The United Nations' children's agency, UNICEF, said on Friday July 30 that more than 100,000 children in Tigray could suffer life-threatening malnutrition in the next year.  Food experts say 400,000 people in Tigray are experiencing "catastrophic levels of hunger".  Meanwhile all aid routes into Tigray are blocked except for one road from Afar region where food convoys have recently been attacked, reportedly by pro-government militias.  The Ethiopian government has suspended the activities of three foreign humanitarian organizations which have been working in northern Tigray. Ethiopia's Agency for Civil Society Organizations said on August 4, 2021 that it had identified "rule violations" by Doctors Without Borders (MSF), the Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) and the Maktoume Foundation.

Myanmar [3, 4]

The general who took power in a coup in Myanmar in February has named himself prime minister and said emergency rule may now extend to August 2023. In an hour-long speech, Min Aung Hlaing pledged to hold a "free and fair multi-party election" but also called the elected party he removed "terrorists".  Hundreds have died in continuing protests against the military coup.  

Myanmar’s ambassador to the United Nations, Kyaw Moe Tun sent a letter to the UN secretary general, António Guterres, saying 40 bodies had been found in July in the Sagaing area of north-western Myanmar.  The junta has denied the massacre, while news agencies have not been able to independently verify the reports due to mobile networks being cut in the remote region.  The envoy's statement came as the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) on Wednesday appointed an envoy to Myanmar after a months-long delay in diplomatic efforts to resolve the coup crisis. The appointment of an envoy is expected to clear the way for Asean to send emergency aid to help authorities cope with a severe Covid-19 outbreak.

Colombia [5, 6]

Colombian authorities unlawfully detained, tortured, and used lethal weapons against peaceful protesters during the demonstrations that have swept the country since April, said a new report from Amnesty International.  These practices are not isolated incidents, but rather reflect a pattern of violent repression by Colombian authorities including President Iván Duque, who fuelled protests by sending military units “shaped by more than six decades of armed conflict” into city streets, the report concluded.  

Protests in Colombia began in late April, initially against a tax proposal that has since been axed, though they quickly morphed into a nationwide howl of outrage over entrenched economic disparity. Protesters stayed in the streets for nearly two months, with marches taking place almost every day in major cities.  The police response was brutal, with at least 44 protesters killed and 1,650 injured across the country. 

Venezuela [9]

Talks between Venezuela's government and the opposition about the country's political crisis are expected to begin in mid-August in Mexico. The dialogue will be supported by international actors including Norway, which acted as a mediator in a previous dialogue proceeding in 2019 that collapsed before the two sides could hammer out a deal to ease the political standoff.

President Nicolas Maduro has said he is willing to negotiate with opposition leader Juan Guaido.  Maduro has said the agenda will have to be focused on lifting U.S. sanctions, most of which were created by former U.S. President Donald Trump in 2019 in efforts to force Maduro from power.  Guaido has said the opposition wants to use the talks to push for guarantees of free and fair elections.

Cuba [10]

The United States is finding itself increasingly isolated in pursuit of its sanctions and its six-decade embargo against Cuba.  This year's resounding 184-2 vote at the UN for the US to end its embargo marked the 29th straight year the nations of the world asked the US to end the embargo.  While the politically important "anti-Castro" Cuban exile community is urging additional actions after the July protests, the rest of the world is telling the United States to "back off."  

The right-wing governments of Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala and Honduras joined the United States in issuing a statement condemning mass arrests and calling for full restoration of disrupted internet access.  Yet only 20 foreign ministers worldwide joined in signing the letter, signalling how relatively isolated Washington is on its Cuba policy, analysts said.  Even U.S. allies like Canada who have condemned the Cuban crackdown and supported protesters' right to freedom of expression did not sign.

Mexico [7, 8]

In U.S. federal court in Boston on Wednesday August 4, the Mexican government sued U.S. gun-makers and distributors, including some of the biggest names in guns like Glock Inc., arguing that their commercial practices have unleashed tremendous bloodshed in Mexico.  The Mexican government argues that the companies know that their practices contribute to the trafficking of guns to Mexico and facilitate it. Mexico wants compensation for the havoc the guns have wrought in its country.  

The United States is by far the world's largest arms dealer.  In 2019, Trump withdrew US support from the UN Arms Trade Treaty.  The US signed the treaty in 2013 but never ratified it. The Treaty is intended to ensure "that arms in private ownership do not enter illicit circuits" by regulating conventional weapons, including small arms, battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships.


Sources: [1] BBC News  - 1  [2] allAfrica  [3] BBC News - 2  [4] The Guardian -1 [5] Al Jazeera - 1 [6] The Guardian - 2  [7] NPR  [8] Al Jazeera - 2  [9] Reuters - 1  [10]  Reuters -2

Biden's nuclear flip-flop, the South China Sea, and the coming Cold War

POSTED AUGUST 12, 2021

On the campaign trail, candidate Biden said the United States “does not need new nuclear weapons” and that his “administration will work to maintain a strong, credible deterrent while reducing our reliance and excessive expenditure on nuclear weapons.”  

In the Oval Office, President Biden has proven to be as disappointing in his nuclear weapons budget as he is in bringing the US and Iran back into compliance with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.

Biden's acquiescence in continuing the Trump nuclear arms buildup  combined with his Administration's confrontational China policy may have started both a new nuclear arms race and a new Cold War.  Having spent more than half my life during the Cold War era of "mutually assured destruction," I have no wish to see it happen again.  

The New Arms Race

Although the United States already has many times the nuclear weapons that it needs to provide what Biden calls a "credible deterrent,"  his Administration's first budget request proposes to continue the expensive and controversial nuclear weapons sustainment and modernization efforts it inherited from the Trump administration.  According to the most recent Congressional Budget Office assessment of the cost of nuclear forces published in late May, the United States as of the end of the Trump administration is planning to spend $634 billion over the next decade to sustain and modernize the arsenal. This is an increase of $140 billion, or 28%, from the previous 10-year projection just two years ago. [1]

Trump's buildup of the nuclear arsenal and Biden's failure to cut the nuclear budget may initiate a nuclear arms race with China.  In response to the US defense budget and continuing military pressure in the South China Sea and the Taiwan Straits, Chinese military experts are urging an increase in the number of the country's nuclear weapons, especially its sea-based nuclear deterrent of intercontinental submarine-launched ballistic missile.  Think that's a coincidence?  Think again.  President Biden’s latest Pentagon budget proposed millions for new Sea-Launched Cruise Missiles (SLCMs): weapons rejected by four previous administrations and that Navy officials themselves don’t want in their arsenal. [2, 3]

The one and perhaps only definitive answer to the existential threat of nuclear weapons is to eliminate them entirely.  Instead of initiating a new nuclear arms race, the United States could have taken the lead in this effort with the objective being the eventual total disarmament of the nine current nuclear nations (graphic below) and the implementation of a strongly monitored non-proliferation agreement to prevent any nation from acquiring them in the future.  

Until those goals are reached, there are several things that the nine nuclear nations can do to decrease the possibility of a civilization-ending nuclear war [7]:

The New Cold War

In early February, less than three weeks into the Biden presidency, the Administration made its first move in the South China Sea.  Two U.S. carrier groups conducted joint exercises, days after a U.S. warship sailed near Chinese-controlled islands in the disputed waters.  China denounced the United States for damaging peace and stability.  In April, China sent its own aircraft carrier into a region of the Sea where the United States had been just conducted naval exercises The Liaoning's reported arrival in the South China Sea came after a US Navy expeditionary strike group, fronted by the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt and amphibious assault ship USS Makin Island, conducted exercises in the South China Sea a day earlier. [4, 5]

This week at the UN, China and the United States sparred over who presented the biggest threat to stability in the region.  The South China Morning Post reports on the exchange [6]:

China has faced “no consequences” for ignoring rules in the South China Sea, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said at the latest UN maritime security summit, as the two powers blamed each other for stirring up tensions in the flashpoint region.  Blinken took aim at what he called “dangerous encounters between vessels at sea and provocative actions to advance unlawful maritime claims” in the South China Sea.

Blinken’s remarks were soon met with protests from China, with Dai Bing, the Chinese deputy ambassador at the UN, calling the US the “biggest threat to stability in the South China Sea”.  As the only major power to have failed to ratify the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos), an international treaty that lays down a comprehensive regime of law and order in the world’s oceans and seas, the US “has no credibility … to act as a judge of the convention and to dictate and interfere with other countries.”

The Biden Administration has yet to prove that it possesses the skill and imagination to defuse tensions in the area.  China, for its part, is maintaining close diplomatic ties with Russia and increasing its military spending.  There is much at stake here and much to advise a more co-operative approach.  Besides being our largest trade partner, China holds more than $1 trillion in US debt.  Resolving the climate crisis - about which the world received another wake-up call this week [link below left]- will also require the co-operation of both countries, the two largest emitters of CO2.  

If the United States is ever to move off this binary paradigm of "us vs. them, good vs. evil" in foreign affairs, we must first put to rest the distorted version of American Exceptionalism which infects both political parties. 

The reality is that there is much here at home - think COVID-19, climate change, poverty, hunger, and inequality to name a few - that can use some fixing and much in our foreign policy that can only be described as hypocritical and arrogant.  The United States, if it chooses to live up to its highest ideals, can indeed play an "exceptional" role in making the world a better place.  No nation is better equipped to address the poverty, disease, and hunger that plague so many.

As the Biden Administration convinces itself that China is an existential threat to the United States (which it is not), Congress is now considering the EAGLE Act, which would commit our tax dollars to dangerous anti-China rhetoric, as well as wasteful and environmentally damaging military training, and an extra $7 billion of our tax dollars to the Department of Defense.  The bill seeks to address human rights abuse accusations in China while ignoring the very same issues of "forced labor in U.S. prisons, ICE concentration camps that target people for their ethnic origins, and extralegal detention facilities like Guantanamo Bay that have previously detained and interrogated Uyghur Muslims. Beyond that, the EAGLE Act’s rhetoric continues the Sinophobic demonization of China that began under the Trump administration while claiming to rebuke overt racism and the former President." [8] 

One of the problems with cold wars is that they could tip over into an active war.  Another is the proxy wars that destroy lives in third party countries.  To prevent these blood-spilling "hot" wars, John Gerson writing at Counter Punch [9] suggests:

+ U.S. adoption of a no first use nuclear war fighting doctrine, renewed U.S.-Chinese military to military consultations to prevent miscalculations, and credible U.S. and Chinese steps toward fulfilling their Article VI NPT obligation.

+ Ending all provocative and dangerous military shows of force.

+ Honoring the one-China formula and encouraging Chinese-Taiwanese negotiations. 

+ Engage the ASEAN Regional Forum to renew U.S.-Chinese-ASEAN multilateral negotiations, including a binding Southeast Asian Code of Conduct regarding military operations in the South China/West Philippine Sea and for joint development of the sea’s mineral resources.

+ Nuclear "umbrella states" signing and ratifying the Treaty on the Prohibition if Nuclear Weapons to put pressure on all the nuclear weapons states.

Diplomacy can work.  The unending failures of America's forever wars in the Middle East have proved what does not work.  It's time to try something else.

Sources: [1] Arms Control Association, July 9  [2] Global Times, May 28 [3] Win Without War  [4] Reuters, Feb 9 [5]  CNN, April 12 [6] South China Morning Post, Aug 10  [7] Union of Concerned Scientists  [8] Counter Punch - 1, July 20 [9] Counter Punch - 2, August 10

World News Briefs

POSTED SEPTEMBER 10, 2021

Ethiopia [5, 6, 7 ]

The conflict in the Tigray region of Ethiopia is entering a particularly dangerous and critical phase.  What started as a dispute between the central government and a regional ruling party, the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), has widened into a civil war that has unleashed a humanitarian disaster and left hundreds of thousands of people on the brink of famine.  

Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed last month issued a call to arms for "all capable citizens", urging them to join the army to suppress the resurgent Tigrayan rebellion “once and for all.” TPLF-allied forces have gained control of Tigray and have now crossed into the neighboring Amhara and Afar regions.  They even vowed to march on the capital Addis Ababa if a government blockade on the Tigray region is not lifted.  In recent days, both the Ethiopian military and the Tigray rebels claim to have killed thousands of enemy fighters.  

As the fighting surges, the flow of humanitarian aid into Ethiopia's northern Tigray region has been slowed to a trickle.  Grant Leaity, the UN’s acting humanitarian coordinator for Ethiopia said in a statement that "stocks of relief aid, cash and fuel are running very low or are completely depleted. Food stocks already ran out on 20 August.”  A negotiated settlement appears to be the only way the conflict will end, but attempts to mediate it have so far been unsuccessful.

Iran Nuclear Talks [1, 2]

The Biden Administration may have missed its chance to rejoin the JCPOA and bring Iran back into compliance with the agreement.  Iran hardliner Ebrahim Rahisi won the presidential election in June and replaced moderate Hassan Rouhani in August.  The talks have been on hold since the election.  Rahisi is showing little urgency in resuming the indirect talks with the United States, and Secretary of State Blinken is warning that US patience is not going to last forever.  Iran has said that it needs 2 to 3 months to rejoin the talks.  The US and Germany have said that is too long, expressing concern that Iran is continuing to enrich uranium.  Iran has reached out to Qatar and United Arab Emirates - indicating all hope may not yet be lost.

If the talks collapse, Biden and Blinken will only have themselves to blame.  In December, after Biden's victory but before the Iranian moderates' defeat, Iran's foreign minister Javad Zarif stated that Iran would come back into full compliance with its nuclear deal immediately after the incoming Biden administration in the US lifted all the illegal sanctions imposed by Donald Trump.  Biden could have done this on Day One of his administration.  He did not do so - apparently choosing to use the sanctions as bargaining chips instead.  

Afghanistan [3,4]

Dozens of women in Kabul and the north-eastern Afghan province of Badakhshan protested against the formation of an all-male interim Taliban government to rule Afghanistan. As the Taliban government seeks international recognition, the EU said the Islamist group had reneged on promises to make their government "inclusive and representative", while the US also expressed concern that the interim government includes figures linked to attacks on US forces.  A lack of clarity on the Taliban's position on women in Afghanistan has generated "incredible fear" across the country, a senior U.N. official said on Wednesday, warning there were daily reports of curbs on the rights of women.

Brazil [8]

Brazil's far-right president Jair Bolsonaro took a page from his friend Donald Trump's page book as he battles Congress and the judiciary over their refusal to go along with his attempts to rewrite electoral rules ahead of the 2022 election and over probes into him and his allies that could imperil them criminally.  On September 7, Brazil's Independence Day, one hundred thousand hard-core Bolsonaro supporters responded to his call and showed up at rallies in Brasilia and Sao Paolo, where he said he would not follow the decisions of certain justices, including one who will be in charge of the electoral tribunal during the 2022 elections.  The September 7 marches were the culmination of Bolsonaro's attempt to discredit Brazilian democracy, as his handling of the pandemic, the state of the Brazilian economy, and charges of corruption have plunged his approval rating to 23 percent.  

Although a January-6-style insurrection did not occur, Brazilian democracy remains in danger.  The September 7 marches were a test for how far Bolsonaro and his backers might take their threats.  They showed that Bolsonaro's dwindling but loyal base is buying into his attacks on Brazil’s democracy.  The marchers carried pro-Bolsonaro signs, some blasting the Supreme Court and  some calling for a military takeover.  It is not clear that  Bolsonaro has enough support in the military to engineer a coup should he fail to win the election, but the threat to Brazilian democracy remains.

Venezuela [9]

Venezuelan government and opposition representatives said they agreed during talks in Mexico to find ways to deal with the pressing needs of the people. In a joint statement, Venezuela's government and the opposition said they agreed to "establish mechanisms for the restoration and achievement of resources to meet the social needs of the population with special emphasis on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic." The Maduro government repeated its call for an end to US sanctions.  President Biden has said he is open to that possibility if progress is made in the talks.  Unlike previous failed attempts, the talks in Mexico have included other parties, including Norway, which led the talks, as well as the Netherlands, Russia, Bolivia and Turkey.


Sources: [1] Forbes, Sep 9  [2] The Guardian, Dec 3, 2020 [3] BBC, Sep 8  [4] Reuters, Sep 8  [5] Al Jazeera, Sep 2 - 1 [6] BBC, Sep 5  [7] Al Jazeera, Sep 2 - 2 [8] Vox, Sep 8  [9] DW, Sep 7

World News Briefs: Democracy, Human Rights, and Freedom of Expression

POSTED OCTOBER 28, 2021

Another coup by the military, this time in Sudan, threatens to reverse that country's steps toward democracy.  The head of Sudan’s Sovereign Council, General Abdel Fattah El Burhan, declared the dissolution of the transitional council, which has been in place since the overthrow of the country's long-time ruler, Omar el-Bashir, in 2019.  A long-running competition between various Sudanese actors came to a head in recent weeks and months, including a previous attempted coup only a month ago, as rival interests both pro-military and pro-democracy took to the streets.  The African Union has suspended Sudan until the civilian-led council is restored. Demonstrations against the military takeover are continuing in the capital Khartoum. [1,2,3]

In Myanmar, where a military coup overthrew the government in February, 1183 people are now confirmed dead and a total of 7031 people are currently under detention.  In total, 65 persons have been sentenced to death including two under the age of 18.  The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)  held an emergency meeting late Friday Oct 22 after Myanmar refused to cooperate with the bloc’s crisis envoy. ASEAN announced that they will invite a non-political representative instead of Myanmar’s military leader to its upcoming summit, in what some are calling its sharpest rebuke yet 0f the junta leaders.  Earlier this month, ASEAN expressed their disappointment that Myanmar’s military has made no significant progress in implementing a Southeast Asian roadmap for peace following their coup. [4,5,6]

In a move more consistent with authoritarian regimes than with a democracy, Israel labeled six human rights groups as "terrorist" organizations.  The designation was swiftly condemned by Israeli human rights groups ("Criminalizing such work is an act of cowardice, characteristic of repressive authoritarian regimes"), international human rights organization ("...an attack by the Israeli government on the international human rights movement. For decades, Israeli authorities have systematically sought to muzzle human rights monitoring and punish those who criticize its repressive rule over Palestinians."), the United Nations, and democracy activists across the world.  In the United States, progressive Congressmembers have issued statements denouncing the terrorist designation.  The Biden Administration has yet to speak on the matter, although Israel appears concerned - they are sending an envoy to Washington. [7, 8, 9, 10]

The Nobel Committee has awarded the 2021 Nobel Peace Prize to two journalists, Filipino-American Maria Ressa and Russian Dmitri Muratov "for their efforts to safeguard freedom of expression, which is a precondition for democracy and lasting peace ." 

Maria Ressa is an outspoken critic of Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte.  Her arrest in 2019 and conviction in 2020 for "cyberlibel" was seen by many in the opposition and the international community as a politically motivated act by Duterte's government.  Time magazine designated her as one of the "guardians" named as Persons of the Year in 2018 for her battle against misinformation.  Referring to the Trump presidency, she said at the time, "“I think the biggest problem that we face right now is that the beacon of democracy, the one that stood up for both human rights and press freedom—the United States—now is very confused.  What are the values of the United States?”  More recently, she has called for technology companies to face greater regulation globally to curb disinformation on social media, as she criticized Facebook for being “biased against facts.” [12, 13, 14]

Donald Trump v. the First Amendment (New Left Bank Cafe, Dec 15, 2016)

Dmitry Muratov is the editor of the independent Russian newspaper Novaya Gazeta and a persistent critic of the Kremlin, government corruption and human rights abuses in Russia.  Since Novaya Gazeta was established by Muratov and colleagues in 1993, it has investigated corruption inside and outside Russia, as well as the long wars in Chechnya. Six of the paper’s reporters and contributors have been murdered for their work. Muratov said the prize belonged to them: “It’s for Igor Domnikov, it’s for Yuri Shchekochikhin, it’s for Anna Stepanovna Politkovskaya, it’s for Nastya Baburova, it’s for Natalia Estemirova, for Stas Markelov,” he told Russian media. “It is that of those who died defending the right of people to freedom of speech.” [15]

The United States is once again trying to extradite Wikileaks founder Julian Assange from Great Britain.  If extradited and convicted, Assange faces 175 years in prison under the Espionage Act for publishing classified documents exposing U.S. war crimes in the 20 year "war on terror".  Last week, the Progressive International convened a gathering of the Belmarsh Tribunal, which is named after the prison where Assange is being held. The people’s tribunal is modeled on the Russell War Crimes Tribunal, which was formed in 1966 by Bertrand Russell and Jean-Paul Sartre and others to investigate U.S. war crimes in Vietnam.  

The former Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varooufakis notes that Julian Assange is being "persecuted for revealing to the world...the crimes against humanity perpetrated by our own elected leaders, in our name, behind our backs."   Other excerpts from speakers at the Belmarsh Tribunal are in the Democracy Now! link to the right. [11]


Sources: [1] Informed Comment [2] BBC News [3] The Guardian -1 [4] Assistance Association for Political Prisoners  [5] Associated Press  [6] Al Jazeera  - 1[7] Common Dreams  [8] Mondoweiss  [9] Al Jazeera - 2 [10] Independent  [11] Democracy Now! [12] Wikipedia [13] Time  [14] Bloomberg  [15] The Guardian-2

Ten to be thankful for in 2021

POSTED NOVEMBER 25, 2021

World News Updates

POSTED DECEMBER 10, 2021

Ethiopia [1, 2]

The year-long war in the Tigray region of Ethiopia, which has killed tens of thousands, displaced more than 2 million, and has been marked by war crimes on both sides, is entering an uncertain phase after government troops recaptured two towns from the rebels.  Just a month ago, the Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF) rebel group appeared to be on the offensive and had reportedly reached a point 135 miles from the capital Addis Ababa.  President Abiy announced last week he would lead operations in the field, the government announced a string of victories and the rebels acknowledged making adjustments to their strategy.  The African Union is trying to broker a ceasefire to avert further bloodshed, though there has been little progress so far.  Human Rights Watch decried the lack of international pressure to stop the fighting, noting that the Security Councils of both the UN and the African Union have remained largely paralyzed. Each body has made only one public statement condemning abuses and the UN Security Council has not formally included Ethiopia on its agenda.

For background on the Ethiopian conflict, see the CNN post link in sidebar

Honduras [3, 4]

Leftist presidential candidate Xiomara Castro is poised to become Honduras’s first woman president, putting an end to over a decade of right-wing neoliberal rule.  With 86 percent of the vote counted she has a 14 point lead over her nearest opponent.  The elections saw massive turnout in the hopes that 12 years of right-wing rule could be reversed.  When she takes office on January 27, she will face a number of daunting challenges: restoring the country’s battered democratic institutions, tackling widespread corruption, and recovering from the crises caused by COVID-19 and last year’s devastating hurricanes.  Castro's victory  is seen as a blow to Washington, which has embraced successive right-wing governments despite widespread accusations that Honduras has become a narco-military regime.  

In the 12 years since a 2009 coup removed Castro’s husband, Manuel Zelaya, from office, successive conservative governments have gutted social programs, increased militarization, and launched a systematic attack on human rights and the environment.  Under the current president, Juan Orlando Hernandez, Hondurans have fled en masse to the United States amid crushing poverty, violence and disasters fueled by climate change – all contributing to a sense of hopelessness, particularly among the country’s youth.  

The immigration crisis at our southern border is a result of more than a century of US intervention in Central America.  For background on the US role in fueling the Honduras migration, see the Democracy Now! post link in the sidebar.

Myanmar [5, 6]

In Myanmar, the country’s last elected leader, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, was formally sentenced to prison ten months after being deposed in a military coup d’état. The elections in 2015 and 2020 – which brought Aung San Suu Kyi and her party to power in Myanmar’s first civilian government – sparked hopes of a brighter future for Myanmar.  The gains Myanmar made over the past decade may be the main reason that the oppressive military regime hasn’t succeeded in gaining complete control of the country.  Thousands of anti-coup protestors have been arrested since February, and, according to the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners at least 1,300 protesters and bystanders have been killed.  Free speech and media have been effectively silenced, and over 120 journalists have been arrested.

The coup occurred less than a month after the Trump-fueled Insurrection of January 6 under eerily similar circumstances as reported by the BBC: "The military seized control on 1 February following a general election which Ms Suu Kyi's NLD party won by a landslide.  The armed forces had backed the opposition, who were demanding a rerun of the vote, claiming widespread fraud. The election commission said there was no evidence to support these claims.  The coup took place as a new session of parliament was set to open."

Occupied Palestine [7]

The UN reported that Israeli "settlers" carried out 273 attacks against Palestinians or their property in the first half of the year.  The escalation from previous years prompted the UN Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process, Tor Wennesland, to deliver  alarming remarks to the United Nations Security Council about the dangers of an outbreak of further violence on the part of the Israeli state and its squatter-settlers toward the 5 million Palestinians they keep stateless and under brutal military occupation.  The Special Coordinator said, “I am concerned that if we do not act quickly and decisively, we risk plunging into another deadly escalation of violence.”  The US ambassador to the United Nations, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, shared some of his alarm in her own speech to the UNSC, noting that “The practice has reached a critical juncture and it is now undermining even the very viability of a negotiated two-state solution."  [sidebar]

An April report from the UN Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner warned of "rising Israeli settler violence in a climate of impunity."   So the recent statement from the UN is not unexpected.  More surprising is the Ambassador Thomas-Greene's statement.  The United States seldom criticizes Israel for its human rights violations.  The actions of the squatters apparently are egregious enough to warrant the statement.  

Russia - Ukraine [8, 9]

Russia is amassing troops along its border with Ukraine.  Many in the West fear that Russia is planning an invasion.  [sidebar] During a virtual summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, President Biden threatened to impose new economic sanctions and other measures if Russia invades Ukraine. The talks were held amid growing tension between the two countries over the expansion of NATO in Eastern Europe and Russia’s deployment of tens of thousands troops along the border of Ukraine.  Russia President Vladimir Putin characterized his virtual meeting with President Joe Biden as open, substantive and constructive, and he announced that the Kremlin would within a week present the U.S. with new proposals on joint security issues.

Ambassador Thomas-Greene expresses concern regarding the viability of the two-state-solution, but anyone viewing events of the past decades could see this coming: the massive influx of settlers into Occupied Palestine, the brutal blockade of the Gaza Strip, the Israeli right's sabotage of the Kerry Peace Process talks, former Prime Minister Netanyahu's statement that a Palestinian state would not exist under his watch, and, the Trump Administration's actions to dash whatever hopes remained for Palestine from his move of the US embassy to Jerusalem, to his slashing of aid to the UN agency responsible for Palestine, to his exit from the UN Human Rights Council over its investigation into Israeli war crimes to his "Deal of the Century".


Overheated rhetoric, broken promises: Russia, Ukraine, and NATO

POSTED JANUARY 21, 2021

In this past Wednesday's address regarding his first year in office, President Biden promised severe consequences to Russia were they to invade Ukraine.  Biden later clarified that he meant severe economic consequences, but still the Russophobes are braying in a replay of all that was wrong with the Cold War of the mid-twentieth century.  In those days, we called the Russophobes "anti-communists."  Their illogic held sway over American foreign policy for decades - principally in the name of the discredited domino theory.  They led us to abandon our democratic principles, to break with the right of national self-determination and to support any right-wing dictator who cried that communists were taking over his country.  In the ultimate irony, the more rabid of these anti-communists even persecuted fellow citizens for their political beliefs.

Russia's troop buildup on its border with Ukraine has Western nations concerned that Russia is about to invade Ukraine.  Does Putin really intend to invade Ukraine?  Nina Khrushcheva, former Soviet leader Nikita Khruschev's great-granddaughter and now a professor of international affairs at The New School thinks not.  In an interview with Democracy Now!, she says President Vladimir Putin is expanding Russia’s sphere of influence but will not invade Ukraine. “It’s not that he wants to take more territory. I think he wants to get heard.” 

That is also what senior Russian diplomats are saying in talks with NATO.  As Biden addressed the nation, Russia maintained a tough posture amid the tensions over its troop buildup near Ukraine, with a top diplomat warning that Moscow will accept nothing less but “watertight” U.S. guarantees precluding NATO’s expansion to Ukraine.  Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov, who led the Russian delegation at the security talks with the U.S. in Geneva last week, reaffirmed that Moscow has no intentions of invading Ukraine as the West fears, but said that receiving Western security guarantees is an imperative for Moscow.

Why does Putin "want to get heard"?  Look no further than the NATO expansion into former Soviet-bloc countries in eastern Europe.  Many Russian leaders, including Vladimir Putin, believe this is a betrayal of promises made during and immediately after the break-up of the Soviet Union. [link below left]  In 1999, Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic joined NATO, amid much debate within the organization and Russian opposition.  Another expansion came with the accession of seven Central and Eastern European countries: Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia. Albania and Croatia joined on 1 April 2009, prior to the 2009 Strasbourg–Kehl summit. The most recent member states to be added to NATO are Montenegro on 5 June 2017 and North Macedonia on 27 March 2020.  

NATO's overtures to Ukraine appear to be a step too far.  Ukraine was an actual part of the Soviet Union from the end of the Second World until the USSR's dissolution in 1991.  Ukraine maintained a close relationship with Russia for more than 20 years until a 2014 coup* resulted in the ousting of the elected president Viktor Yanukovych.  Moscow considered the overthrow of the Yanukovych government illegal.  Ensuing pro-Russian and pro-coup protests in eastern and southern Ukraine resulted in Russian troop invasions, the annexation of Crimea, and self-proclaimed proto-states of  Donetsk and Luhansk.

But this is not 2014, and the hysteria around the Russian troop buildup on their common border is misplaced and dangerous.  Russia is suspicious of a continuing expansion of NATO, a military organization pledged to go to war if one of its member nations is invaded.  Russia is also concerned about the continuing betrayal of the pledges of Western nations.  As Katrina vanden Heuvel  sums it up [link below right]:

"Gorbachev was promised after German reunification that NATO would not move one inch eastward. That is to be found in archives — National Security Archive, for example. And there is kind of a thought that Putin is asking for written material because he thinks that might protect him from Gorbachev’s fate. I don’t think so. But again I come back to, if there is creative diplomacy, I think you could see a resolution of this crisis. And to have war at this time is to add to the other wars we confront, climate, pandemics."

Consider how the United States would have reacted had Mexico joined the Warsaw Pact in the days of the Cold War.  That's the equivalent of what is happening here.  Ukraine shares a 1400 mile border with Russia.  To end the crisis, all NATO and the United States have to do is guarantee that the NATO military alliance will not venture onto Russia's doorstep.  

*In November 2013 protests began in response to President Viktor Yanukovych's refusal to sign a political association and free trade agreement with the European Union.  In February 2014, a series of violent events involving protesters, riot police, and unknown shooters in the Ukrainian capital Kyiv culminated in the ousting of elected president Viktor Yanukovych, and the overthrow of the Ukrainian government.  Moscow considered this overthrow of the Yankovich government to be illegal.  In the aftermath of the overthrow - in February and March 2014, pro-Russian protests erupted in eastern Ukraine.  Russia invaded and subsequently annexed the Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine.  Protests in eastern and southern Ukraine also provoked a Soviet invasion, resulting in the self-proclaimed proto-states Donetsk and Luhansk. 

Sources: Democracy Now! - 1,  PBS, Wikipedia

Biden's appallingly unimaginative and failing foreign policy

POSTED FEBRUARY 6, 2022

Occasionally, I remind myself that Joe Biden did, after all, vote for the Iraq War, our greatest foreign policy disaster since Vietnam. Biden along with 76 other Senators swallowed whole the neocon lies and gave George W. Bush the go-ahead for the invasion and all the subsequent horrors that ensued.

Biden's role in the ensuing months went far beyond that vote. In the wake of September 11th, Biden stood as a leading Democratic voice on foreign policy, chairing the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee. As President Bush attempted to sell the U.S. public on the war, Biden became one of the administration’s steadfast allies in this cause, backing claims about the supposed threat posed by Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein and insisting on the necessity of removing him from power. [1]

This past year provided ample evidence that Joe Biden has not changed much since that vote for the Iraq War. It is also obvious that he lacks the imagination and political courage to take US foreign policy in a new, more productive direction. Not only has Biden failed to move the needle on foreign policy, he has not yet undone some of the abhorrent actions of his abhorrent predecessor – policies that could have been undone with the stroke of a pen. [sidebar below]

Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (Iran Nuclear Agreement)

Prime among those Trump policies that could have been undone with the stroke of a pen is the removal of the Iran sanctions and the US return to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. The United State unilaterally and without cause left the Iran nuclear agreement and then in violation of that agreement imposed on Iran the harshest peacetime sanctions ever. After a year in which the other signatories failed to find a way around the US sanctions, Iran began to incrementally enrich its uranium production.

When it became clear that Biden had won the presidency in the 2020 elections, Iran signaled that it would return to complete compliance with the JCPOA as soon as the United States lifted the sanctions.  Instead, the Biden Administration chose to use the sanctions as bargaining chips, Iran hard-liners were elected in June, and President Obama's signature piece of foreign policy remains as dead as it's been since Trump.

Recently, there has been some movement in the talks, with the US issuing a waiver that would allow third parties, such as France or Russia, to consult with Tehran about how to dial back and repurpose their civilian nuclear energy program. [2]  Is a deal actually imminent?  Maybe.  Maybe not.  Biden will have to stand up to the Iran hawks in Washington to accomplish.  Sadly, they are already at work attempting to sabotage any deal before it's even announced. As soon as word of a possible deal got around, the powerful chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ), deep in the pockets of the Israel lobby*,  took to the chamber floor to trash the negotiations and call for a continuation of Trump's failed "maximum pressure" policy. [3]

Russia – Ukraine

As for Biden's own doing, at the top of that list is the Administration's rhetoric and NATO's obstinacy surrounding Russia and Ukraine.  We are sending troops and arms to Europe to do what? Fight the Russians in the Ukraine? Having been betrayed by the United States' and NATO's failure to honor a handshake agreement at the time of the Soviet Union's dissolution [sidebar], Russia is asking for a written guarantee that NATO will not expand into Ukraine, which shares a 1400 mile border with Russia.  As with the JCPOA, we refuse to concede the single request that would immediately resolve the issue.  Even Ukraine's president is asking for a tone down in the rhetoric and a lessening of the panic level. [sidebar]  

Afghanistan withdrawal and the aftermath

This one falls halfway between Trump and Biden. Trump negotiated the agreement with the Taliban; Biden executed it. Biden's intentions were good – end America's longest war in the Graveyard of Empires – but it was poorly planned and badly executed.

After the Taliban quickly took over the country, Biden placed sanctions on the country, which is now experiencing a humanitarian crisis. Congress will be no help. On Thursday February 4, a majority of House lawmakers – including 44 Democrats - rejected a measure put forth by Rep. Pramila Jayapal that would have required an assessment of the humanitarian impact of the Biden administration's economic sanctions on Afghanistan and the U.S. freezing nearly $10 billion in assets belonging to the Afghan central bank. [4]

United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres  noted that "daily life has become a frozen hell for the people of Afghanistan." International Rescue Committee president and CEO David Miliband warned that "the people of Afghanistan are being pushed towards the brink of disaster, and for some already beyond the brink."

Miliband said that "the proximate cause of today's humanitarian disaster is clear; the economic tourniquet applied to Afghanistan, with the withdrawal of budgetary support to pay civil servants (including teachers and doctors), a freeze on Afghan assets, and broad-ranging sanctions despite exemptions for humanitarian work, is having a brutal and obvious effect."

Sanctions kill. If we haven't learned that by now, shame on us. [sidebar]

Update, Feb 11: In a step towards mitigating a humanitarian disaster of his own making, Biden signed an executive order releasing some of the frozen Afghan assets.

Israel and Occupied Palestine

Donald Trump's treatment of the Palestinians went beyond the pale.**  It would be impossible for Joe Biden to do worse. Having said that, Biden's silence and inaction on the human rights violations and crimes against humanity committed by the Israeli government and military forces are no better than any of his other predecessors.

From its opposition to the International Criminal Court's investigation into war crimes committed in the Palestinian Territories since the brutal siege of Gaza in 2014 to its tepid response to Israel's deadly 11-day assault on Gaza in May 2021 to its recent objection to Amnesty International's labeling of the Israeli policies as apartheid [sidebar], the Biden Administration has shown little backbone in holding Israel accountable for its treatment of the Palestinians.

The President and CEO of Americans for Peace Now*** (APN), Hadar Susskind, called the uproar about Amnesty International's report a "manufactured outrage, a calculated effort to deflect from the real issue - fifty-four years of occupation."  His statement continued, "The truth on the ground is that successive Israeli governments...have perpetuated a military occupation of another people, turning it from a temporary evil during the few short years that followed 1967 into an endemic, oppressive regime, in which the collective national rights and the individual human rights of millions of Palestinians are ruthlessly violated. Israeli political leaders have all but ceased to work to bring this shameful reality to an end, and the Israeli public is largely complicit in perpetuating this disgrace. Instead of acting to end the occupation, Israeli governments have been accelerating a process of de-facto annexation, blurring the distinction between Israel and the occupied West Bank."

As we have seen over many decades, Israel will continue to act with impunity as long as the United States does not hold it accountable.  South African apartheid was finally ended when it became clear that the United States would join the rest of the world in condemning its actions and policies. 

We have enormous leverage with Israel if we choose to use it.  We could condition the nearly $4 billion in military aid that we send them annually on an end to their human rights violations.  We could also stop blocking all UN Security Council actions aimed at  preventing or condemning Israel's violations of international law.  

A Foreign Policy for the 21st Century

A recent article in Slate wondered why all American presidents are so terrible at foreign policy.  The author's main point was that, since the end of the Cold War, foreign affairs have become too chaotic for any White House to master.  That may be true, but there is a more fundamental problem: the prevalent paradigm for American foreign policy has been us versus them.  A distorted view of American exceptionalism, a misguided notion that we are always acting in the world's best interest, and a near total lack of interest in building an international community lie at the heart of our failures.  As a result, we've spent trillions of dollars on weapons we don't need, failed spectacularly and often in our attempts at "nation-building", armed regimes that trample on human rights, and punished with brutal sanctions sovereign nations who do not conform to our standards of liberal capitalism.  

Two of the outstanding Congressional voices for peace, Representatives Pramira Jayapal and Barbara Lee, have proposed a Foreign Policy for the 21st Century resolution that addresses much of our historically problematic approach to the rest of the world. [sidebar]  As Jayapal and Lee write: "The greatest threats to America’s security—pandemics, climate change, economic inequality, authoritarianism—cannot be defeated at the barrel of a gun."  Their  resolution takes as its starting point "a few simple truths":

Political partisanship ensures that Biden will not get any more domestic initiatives through Congress.  The social spending and environmental portions of Build Back Better are dead thanks to Joe Manchin's opposition.  Voting rights will go nowhere thanks to the filibuster.  

If the President wants a signature accomplishment in his second year, it will have to come in the foreign policy arena.  So far, he is sadly lacking. "Not as bad as Trump" is hardly a slogan to run on or a legacy maker.  Perhaps you can't teach an old dog new tricks, but maybe Joe Biden can get a few new ideas from the Jayapal-Lee resolution that will make for a better, more peaceful and just 21st century.

Amnesty International has become the third major human rights organization to accuse Israel of committing the crime of apartheid against Palestinians. Amnesty finds Israel’s system of apartheid has materialized in abuses including massive seizures of Palestinian land and property, unlawful killings, forcible transfer, drastic movement restrictions, and the denial of nationality and citizenship to Palestinians. Amnesty International USA’s executive director Paul O’Brien, calls on the United States to “put pressure on the Israeli government to dismantle this system of apartheid.” 

Notes

*In his 2018 Senate run, Menendez received $576,000 for his campaign from the Israel lobby, the most by far of any Senate candidate.

**During his four years in office, Trump added to the misery of one of the most marginalized peoples on the planet and destroyed any hope for a two-state solution. Cutting off US aid, moving the US embassy to Jerusalem, leaving the UN Human Rights Council after the Israeli massacre of Palestinian protesters, and unilaterally declaring that the Israeli settlements on Palestinian land were not illegal - all indicated that Trump was intent on ending the two-state solution. If there were any remaining doubt, the Trump-Kuchner "peace plan" put the last nail in the coffin of that long-standing American approach to Israel and Occupied Palestine.

***Americans for Peace Now (APN) is the sister organization of Shalom Achshav, Israel's preeminent peace movement.

Sources: [1] In These Times [2] Informed Comment [3] moveon.org [4] Common Dreams


Thinking about the tragedy unfolding in Ukraine

POSTED FEBRUARY 27, 2022

Russia has invaded Ukraine in the latest episode of "The Folly and Tragedy of War."  As with many conflicts, diplomacy could have prevented it.  People are now dying because of that collective failure to find a solution.  

Mainstream media coverage of the Russian troop buildup and the invasion has been devoid of context, primarily in its omission of the background of Russia's relationship with Ukraine, the expansion of NATO into Eastern Europe since the end of the Cold War, and US support for the Maidan coup in 2014.  Before getting to some thoughts on the tragedy unfolding in Ukraine, I'll try to fill in the missing background.

Some background:

Russia and Ukraine

Ukraine's relationship with Russia stretches back centuries.  Most of Ukraine became part of the Russian Empire during the reign of Catherine the Great (1762 -1796) as Russia wrested control of Ukraine from Poland.  In 1922, after the Russian Revolution, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) was established with Ukraine as one of its founding members. Except for the occupation of the country by Nazi Germany (1941-1943), Ukraine would remain part of the Soviet Union until its collapse in 1991.  In 1991,  Leonid Kravchuk, leader of the Soviet republic of Ukraine, declared independence from Moscow. In a referendum and presidential election, Ukrainians approve independence and elect Kravchuk president. 

Kravchuk was succeeded by Leonid Kuchma, who tried to balance Russian and Western interests, from 1994 until 2005.  Pro-Western Viktor Yushchenko served as president from 2005-2010.  It was during Yushchenko's term, in 2008, that NATO promised Ukraine future membership in the western military alliance.  In 2010, pro-Russian Viktor Yanukovich was elected and served as president of Ukraine until he was overthrown after the Euromaidan protests in February 2014.

The Maidan Coup and its Aftermath

Though the overthrow of Yanukovich involved people in the streets and is sometimes referred to as a democratic revolution, the Maidan Revolution was a coup. How much of it was spontaneous and how much directed, or inspired, by high-level actors in the West remains unclear.  The rush to seize Yanukovich’s residence was triggered by snipers who killed some 80 or more protesters and policemen on Maidan.   Initially blamed on Yanukovich himself, it is now acknowledged that the shooters may have been from the neofascist group Right Sector who were among the protesters on the square.  [sidebar below, The Nation] While many question Putin's motivation in claiming he is entering Ukraine to de-nazify it, neo-fascist groups remain prominent in the Ukraine. 

The Maidan Coup was swiftly followed in 2014 by Crimea's annexation by Russia after a March referendum showed overwhelming support in Crimea for joining the Russian Federation. In April 2014, pro-Russian separatists in the eastern region of Donbass declare independence. In May 2014, businessman Petro Poroshenko wins a presidential election in Ukraine promising a pro-Western agenda. 

2017: an association agreement between Ukraine and the EU opens markets for free trade of goods and services, and visa-free travel to the EU for Ukrainians.  

2019: former comic actor Volodymyr Zelenskiy wins an April presidential election on promises to tackle corruption and end the war in eastern Ukraine.

Jan 2021: Zelenskiy appeals to President Biden to let Ukraine join NATO.  A summary of post-Cold-War NATO expansion into former Warsaw Pact countries is given below.

Feb 2021: Zelenskiy's government imposes sanctions on Viktor Medvedchuk, an opposition leader and the Kremlin's most prominent ally in Ukraine.

Spring 2021: Russia masses troops near Ukraine's borders in what it says are training exercises. 

Autumn 2021: Russia again begins massing troops near Ukraine.

Some thoughts:

The invasion is indefensible.  Putin's actions must be condemned.  

Resorting to the violence of war has been the all-too-typical answer to disputes.  Greed, hatred, nationalism, perceived wrongs, perceived threats, balance of power, economic systems, religious beliefs, quest for power, bloodlust - mankind has found many reasons to go to war. They are all wrong.  In my lifetime, there has not been a single war that would even meet the seven medieval ethical requirements for a just war: last resort, legitimate authority, just cause, probability of success, right intention, proportionality, prevent civilian casualties. (For those interested, there's a fuller explanation of the concept of a just war at this link.)

Biden and NATO could have easily prevented the invasion with diplomacy.

The crisis stems directly from NATO's expansion into eastern Europe [timeline and map below].  The crisis could have been stopped by NATO's written guarantee that it would not expand to Ukraine, which shares a 1400 mile border with Russia.  The Biden Administration and NATO offered no such guarantee.  Reuters [sidebar] summarizes the negotiations. Many in Russia's political leadership believe they were betrayed by the verbal agreement at the time of the Soviet Union's collapse - that NATO would not expand into Eastern Europe. [The Guardian sidebar]  The Russian government feels threatened by the NATO military alliance’s expansion to and significant military presence in  eastern Europe. This leads Russia to be hyper-aware of NATO's influence in Ukraine and other nations it views as within its sphere of influence.  [AFSC sidebar]

Sending arms to Ukraine and building up troops in former Warsaw Pact countries will do nothing to stop the Russian invasion.

If anything, these actions add to Russia's paranoia.  It's a windfall for arms manufacturers and a chance for Congressional hawks to propose even more money for "defense".  Several legislative packages that would spend millions of dollars on a militarized response have already been proposed. 

Investments in weapons and war won’t make us safer. Diplomacy, peacebuilding, and global arms control will. 

It is time to rethink what we mean by "security" and whether security can ever be achieved without building a global community that considers the legitimate concerns of other nations and peoples.  [AFSC sidebar] It is time to acknowledge that real security comes from investments in health care, community building, housing, education and food programs.  It is also time to acknowledge the truth of President Eisenhower's words that "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed."

Why now?  What now? What next?

I do not fully understand why Putin chose the winter of 2022 to invade Ukraine, but it is likely related to NATO's official recognition of Ukraine as an "aspiring member" last year and to Ukrainian president Zelenskiy's January 2021 appeal to President Biden to let Ukraine join NATO

Now that Russia has invaded, the extent of the Ukraine tragedy will depend on two things - how far Putin will go to achieve his goal, whatever that may be, and how willing Western nations are to re-examine their NATO expansion.  Putin recently stated that he is seeking the demilitarization of the Ukraine, ratcheting up his previous request for a written guarantee that NATO will not expand into Ukraine.  

The peace organization World Beyond War suggests some long-term actions to reduce future tensions

NATO is a military alliance pledging its members to go to war if any member nation is attacked.  That it still exists when its rival Warsaw Pact disbanded more than 30 years ago is a tribute to the continuing power of war hawks, arms merchants, and the military-industrial-political complex.  

NATO Expansion into Eastern Europe

1988 to 1991 - The collapse of the Soviet Union ends the Cold War. Soviet Union divides into 15 republics, one of which is Ukraine.  In return for Russia's acceptance of German reunification, NATO would not expand into Eastern Europe. 

1999 - Three former Warsaw Pact countries - Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic - join NATO, amid much debate within the organization and Russian opposition. 

2002 to 2004 - NATO expands to seven more Central and Eastern European countries: Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia.

2009 - Albania and Croatia join NATO

2017 - Montenegro joins NATO

2020 - North Macedonia joins NATO

2021 -  NATO officially recognizes three aspiring members: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, and Ukraine 

Ending Putin's War

POSTED MARCH 9, 2022

As a third round of negotiations to end the war in Ukraine broke down over the weekend, antiwar demonstrations broke out across the world in a Day of Action organized by peace groups, and Ukraine called for direct talks between President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russia's Vladimir Putin.

Anti-War Protests

Thousands of people were arrested in Russia on Sunday March 6 for joining a global day of action against Russian President Vladimir Putin's war on Ukraine, which has killed hundreds, perhaps thousands, of civilians and created a refugee crisis with 2 million Ukrainians fleeing the advancing troops.  

The arrests in Russia occurred amid a global wave of protests calling for an end to not only Putin's war but also the eastward expansion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) that has fueled regional tensions.

Leading up to the invasion, Putin pointed to Ukraine possibly joining NATO as a threat. International affairs experts have suggested that the bloodshed in Ukraine might have been avoided if Western officials negotiated more seriously to address Moscow's security concerns.

The day of action was organized by the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, CodePink, No to NATO network, and Stop the War Coalition. Their demands were: "Stop the war in Ukraine. Russian troops out. No to NATO expansion." (Common Dreams, Mar 6)

Even before the day of action, protests had broken out in cities across Russia.  Almost as quickly as the invasion in Ukraine began, so too did antiwar protests in Russia, a challenge to Vladimir Putin’s regime that has been met with a fierce response. Thousands gathered in the country’s largest cities, and at least 13,000 protesters have been arrested since February 24, according to OVD-Info, a human-rights organization that advocates for freedom of assembly in Russia. Meanwhile, a new law ithat calls for up to 15 years imprisonment for calling the Russian invasion a war is an extraordinary crackdown on free speech even during the age of Putin. (New York Magazine, link below)

Russia-Ukraine Negotiations

Ukraine wants direct talks between President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russia's Vladimir Putin after three rounds of negotiations between Russia and Ukraine have failed to produce a peace or even a sustainable ceasefire.  A fourth round of talks will take place very soon, Russian negotiator Leonid Slutsky told Russian state television.

French President Emmanuel Macron said he did not expect a negotiated end to the war in Ukraine for weeks. He said that he had told the Russian leader that a ceasefire must come before any real dialogue, but that Mr Putin had refused, making their regular talks "difficult".

Russia's demands to halt the fighting appear to be:

- Ukraine cease military action and change its constitution to enshrine neutrality.  

- Ukraine acknowledge Crimea as Russian territory and recognize the separatist republics of Donetsk and Lugansk as independent states. (Australian Broadcasting Company, Mar 8)

If this is really all that Russia needs to stop the bloodshed, then it should be an easy negotiation for Ukraine and the West.  

The neutrality demand is similar to the conditions for Austria and Finland during the Cold War.  They could belong neither to NATO or to the Warsaw Pact.  

As for Crimea, Donetsk and Lugansk: Crimea was annexed by Russia in 2014 after a referendum there showed overwhelming support for joining the Russian Federation after the Maidan Coup; likewise, the separatist republics which have  majority Russian ethnic populations declared their independence from Ukraine after the Maidan Coup.

The sticking point may be what Russia means by "cease military action".  If this is a pledge not to join NATO and not to station long-range missiles in Ukraine, this would be similar to the resolution of the Cuban missile crisis.

If however Russia demands complete demilitarization of Ukraine or expects a regime change, then this war may continue for a long, long time.

Anatol Lieven from the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft talks about what a Ukraine-Russia peace deal could look like and what is at stake in a prolonged war in the Democracy Now! interview linked below.

World News: Africa

POSTED MARCH 11, 2022

The Ethiopian conflict, possible South Africa mediation in Russia-Ukraine, US arms humans right abusers (again), and how to stop future coups

Ethiopian conflict is far from over [1, 2,3]

On Monday March 7, the U.N. human rights chief Michelle Bachelet said that the situation in northern Ethiopia had deteriorated since November and her office had received reports of wide-spread violations including rapes and lethal air strikes.  Bachelet told the Geneva-based Human Rights Council her staff had recorded 304 deaths and injuries to 373 people in air attacks "apparently carried out by the Ethiopian Air Force" in Tigray and Afar regions.  In the same speech, Bachelet said her office had received reports of 306 rapes by Tigrayan forces in the Amhara region in Nov-Dec. 2021. 

We may never know the extent of the casualties in the Tigray conflict which started in November 2020 and has since spread to the Afar and Amhara regions.  Estimates range from thousands to tens of thousands dead.  All warring parties have perpetrated severe human rights abuses. In the massive humanitarian catastrophe caused by the conflict, 5.2 million people in Ethiopia’s north have faced hunger and lacked basic supplies for a year as the government purposefully sought to strangle the Tigray region and violence hampered aid delivery. Hundreds of thousands have been displaced and suffered in the Amhara and Afar regions when Tigray forces invaded.  

In late December, Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed halted the counteroffensive of the Ethiopian National Defense Forces (ENDF) at Tigray’s borders gives some hope that international diplomacy, bolstered by a U.S.-created sanctions regime, could finally help incentivize a negotiated end to the conflict.  In a February speech to members of parliament, Ethiopia's Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed opened the door for negotiations with rebel groups in the country.  He indicated that there have been no negotiations so far but he is open for future talks with the Tigrayan leaders.  

South Africa has been asked to mediate Russia-Ukraine [4]

President Cyril Ramaphosa said on Thursday Mar 10 that South Africa had been asked to mediate in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and that he had told his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in a phone call it should be settled through negotiations. "Based on our relations with the Russian Federation and as a member of BRICS, South Africa has been approached to play a mediation role," Ramaphosa said, referring to the emerging market group of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.


Arming human rights abusers: Senate refuses to block $2B arms sale to Egypt

In the latest abandonment of what should be an unequivocal commitment to human rights, the United States Senate rejected a proposal that would have blocked a $2 billion arms sale to Egypt.  The March 10 vote was 81-18 as the military-industrial-political complex again showed its might.  

Human Rights Watch's 2021 report [link below] on conditions in Egypt begins: "In 2021, authorities escalated the use of the abusive Emergency State Security Courts to prosecute peaceful activists and critics who joined thousands of dissidents already in Egypt’s congested prisons. Courts issued death sentences in mass trials, adding to the sharply escalating numbers of executions."  The report summarizes other human rights violations such as police and security force abuses, jailing and travel bans on witnesses to a high-profile gang rape, draconian restrictions on NGO's, prison conditions and deaths in custody, home demolitions in North Sinai, and restrictions on freedom of expression and religion.

Stopping Future Coups in West Africa

In recent years, West Africa has seen a spate of coup attempts most recently in Guinea-Bissau (failed) and Burkina-Faso(successful).  Some suggestions on how to prevent more from The Conversation

Countries, with the help of regional and global partners, must address governance deficits in the form of non-fulfilment of the entitlements of citizenship, socio-economic frustration, and growing insecurity.

Regional bodies like the Economic Community of West African States and the African Union must also be firm and unbiased in their show of contempt for all types of coups. 

Eliminate the adverse socio-economic and political conditions in national and international politics that allow immediate causes of political instability to hide behind a democratic façade.

Sources: [1]Brookings [2] Africa News [3] Reuters - 1  [4] Reuters-2

Refugees

POSTED MARCH 24, 2022

According to the United Nations refugee agency (UNHCR), the number of people forcibly displaced by war, persecution, general violence, or human-rights violations swelled to 84 million as of mid-2021.  As Nick Turse wrote recently at TomDispatch, if these persons formed their own country, "it would be the 17th largest in the world, slightly bigger than Iran or Germany."  

With 3 million more refugees and 6 million more internally displaced so far in Ukraine, that number now exceeds 90 million. Poland has taken in almost 2 million of Ukraine's refugees, and other countries - Romania, Slovakia, Hungary, Moldova and Russia - have also seen significant numbers.  In just one month, more Ukrainians have been forced to leave their homes than in any other country except for Syria and Iraq.

As the eyes of the world focus on the ongoing tragedy in Ukraine, we would do well to also remember the nearly 85 million others who remain forcibly displaced and need the world's aid.  Here are the other countries with the largest number of forcibly displaced.

Syria (13.7 million)

For eleven years, war has inflicted immense suffering on the people of Syria.  Some 6.9 million are internally displaced . Another 6.8 million are refugees or asylum-seekers abroad. More than half of the prewar population has been forced out of their homes.  Neighboring Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey, which are hosting 84% of them, have struggled to cope with one of the largest refugee exoduses in recent history. 

Iraq (9 million)

Brown University's Costs of War Project estimates that, as of 2021, 9.2 million Iraqis were internally displaced or refugees abroad.  The refugee crisis has impacted both Iraqis who fled and the communities that they left behind. Engineers, artists, lawyers, academics, doctors, and other professionals were among the first to escape the war. This migration dismantled many of Iraq's cultural institutions and stripped it of the services that middle class professionals provide.  

Palestine (7 million)

"Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country." Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 13

Approximately 750,000 Palestinians were displaced and became refugees as a result of the 1948 war which led to the founding of Israel.  None of these displaced persons were ever allowed to return to the homes or communities from which they were displaced and the Palestinian refugee population has continued to grow in the time that has passed since 1948.  Seventy-four years after the nakba ("catastrophe"), Palestinians remain without a homeland.  Today there are more than 7 million Palestinian refugees scattered around the world. The reality of Palestinian forced displacement is at the core of the Palestinian experience and the Palestinian refugee issue is at the heart of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

Palestinian boy demonstrating in the 2018 Great March of Return

On May 14, 2018, Israeli soldiers killed 55 Palestinians and wounded 2700.  The death toll since March 30, the first day of the protests, now stood at 104 dead with 12,000 wounded.

Venezuela (6 million)

Since 1999, some 6 million Venezuelans have left the country, the majority since 2019. After the landslide victory of Socialist candidate Hugo Chavez in 1999, some of the wealthier Venezuelans began to leave the country.  As Chavez implemented the policies of his "Bolivarian Revolution", the international community led by the United States began imposing sanctions on the country starting in 2006.  More Venezuelans left the country at that time, but it was the failed attempt by Venezuela's rightwing to remove elected president Nicolás Maduro in 2019 combined with increased sanctions imposed by the Trump Administration that opened the floodgates. 

The increasingly brutal US-led sanctions starting in 2017 have added to the misery of the people of Venezuela, who were already in the midst of an economic crisis marked by extremely high inflation and a shortage of essential goods.  Citing Venezuela's National Survey on Living Conditions finding of a 31 percent increase in general mortality from 2017 to 2018, a report by the Center for Economic and Policy Research* notes that "this would imply an increase of more than 40,000 deaths." 

Afghanistan (6 million)

Afghanistan’s enduring conflicts have forcibly displaced people for more than four decades.  The chaos caused by the Taliban takeover last year added to the numbers.  2.6 million Afghanis are registered as refugees by the UNHCR and another 3.5 million have been internally displaced.  After the Taliban quickly took over the country, Biden placed sanctions on the country, which have exacerbated the humanitarian crisis there. 

The biggest and most destructive sanction currently facing Afghanistan is the seizure of more than $7 billion of the country's assets that are held at the US Federal Reserve.  International Rescue Committee president and CEO David Miliband warned that "the people of Afghanistan are being pushed towards the brink of disaster, and for some already beyond the brink."  Miliband said that "the proximate cause of today's humanitarian disaster is clear; the economic tourniquet applied to Afghanistan, with the withdrawal of budgetary support to pay civil servants (including teachers and doctors), a freeze on Afghan assets, and broad-ranging sanctions despite exemptions for humanitarian work, is having a brutal and obvious effect."

South Sudan (4 million)

Africa's greatest refugee crisis is South Sudan.  The crisis began two years after South Sudan became an independent country.  Since December 2013, the brutal conflict in South Sudan has claimed thousands of lives and driven nearly four million people from their homes.  While many remain displaced inside the country, more than two million have fled to neighboring countries.


While the above are the countries with the most displaced persons, refugees from many other nations are also suffering due to the lingering or ongoing effects of war, coups and ethnic cleansing.  One of these groups is the Rohingya of Myanmar. Like the Palestinians, the Rohingya are a stateless people and victims of ethnic cleansing.  In August 2017, a deadly crackdown by Myanmar's army on Rohingya Muslims sent hundreds of thousands fleeing across the border into Bangladesh. Approximately 900,000 are now in exile, with the vast majority live in 34 extremely congested refugee camps.

Rohingya exodus from Myanmar


What can we do about it?

Note: *"Economic Sanctions as Collective Punishment: The Case of Venezuela", Mark Weisbrot and Jeffrey Sachs, April 2019

A cautionary tale: Viktor Orbán's Hungary

POSTED APRIL 7, 2022

In May of 2019, Donald Trump welcomed a kindred spirit, Hungary's prime minister Viktor Orbán, to the Oval Office.   Coincidentally, I was sightseeing in Budapest, Hungary's capital city, on that day.  Thankfully, I missed the post-meeting festivities as the two leaders heaped fulsome praise upon each other.  

The authoritarian Orbán leads the most right-wing government in Europe.  In power since 2010, the Hungarian prime minister has "accomplished many of the anti-democratic actions Trump can only tweet about. He has rewritten Hungary’s constitution and dismantled judicial checks on power, stifled a once vibrant media, forced a top university out of the country, and criminalized the activities of some human rights organizations. Meanwhile, he has won deeply flawed elections by vilifying migrants, Muslim 'invaders' and the Jewish 'financiers' that supposedly support them." (Washington Post

On Sunday, April 3, to the delight of America's far right, Orbán won re-election to his fourth term as the Prime Minister of Hungary.  On the surface, it may have looked like a free and fair election but it was far from it.  For the past 12 years, Orbán  systematically worked to turn Hungarian democracy into a sham. Through tactics ranging from extreme gerrymandering (his party won 53% of the vote nationally but nearly three-quarters of the seats in parliament*) to media control (90% of all the media in Hungary is owned by the government or an ally of Orban's) to unfair campaign finance rules, he has made it almost impossible for the opposition to defeat his Fidesz party at the ballot box.  (Vox)

This year's election season in Hungary saw the introduction of a fresh round of election law changes that benefited his party, an inflammatory L.G.B.T. referendum to energize his base, and legalization of "voter tourism",  the registration of voters outside of their home districts until now a criminal offense.

As the election approached, the Orbán government system set up during the height of the pandemic blasted out an email alert that wrongly claimed his opponent would drag Hungary into the war in Ukraine.  With the most popular independent news website, Index, taken over by an Orbán ally in 2020 and the opposition-friendly radio station, Klubradio, taken off the air in 2021, there was little to counter the misinformation.

In his more than a decade in power, Orban has not hesitated to use the levers of government power to erode democratic norms and cement one-party rule. He has rewritten the Constitution, remade the courts and used state-run and privately owned television stations — even school textbooks — to advance his agenda or push misinformation about his rivals. [NY Times (link below)]

In an unusual move for an EU member state, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) deployed a full-scale mission involving over 200 observers to Hungary for the election.  The mission found that although there were few procedural problems on election day, the contestants did not compete on an equal footing.  

The preliminary conclusions of the observing team noted a pervasive overlap between the ruling coalition and the government, lack of transparency and insufficient oversight of campaign finances, and “bias and lack of balance in monitored news coverage and the absence of debates between major contestants [that] significantly limited the voters’ opportunity to make an informed choice."  

Hungary is a cautionary tale for the United States.  The right's enthusiasm for Orban's victory tells you just what kind of country they would like to see and how close they are to getting it.  They already control the Courts and most State houses and governorships, and they are on the verge of retaking Congress in the midterms. 

Consider:

As the excellent article in Vox [link below] notes, "Hungary is a warning of what could happen when a ruthless, anti-minority populist backed by a major political party is allowed to govern unchecked. Americans need to pay attention."

Related: 

Countering the Reactionaries, May 29, 2019 

Coronavirus Protests and Politics, Aug 10, 2020  


Note: *Ninety-three seats of Hungary's parliament are proportionally elected, with parties getting a percentage roughly equivalent to their national vote total. The remaining 106 seats work like American or British elections, with one member elected to represent a specific legislative district.  Before the 2014 election, Orbán’s government redrew the single-district map to pack opposition supporters in a handful of districts while spreading their supporters across many. Since then, it has won more than two-thirds of seats in three consecutive elections despite smaller shares of the popular vote — 45 percent in 2014, 49 percent in 2018, and 53 percent in 2022 

World News Updates

POSTED APRIL 13, 2022

Iran Nuclear Talks 

The talks in Vienna to resurrect the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (the Iran "Nuclear Deal") have reached a make or break point.  Last week, Iran said it would return to the negotiating table only to “finalize” a renewed deal.  Both Iran and the United States say that a deal is close, but the deal has been "close" for many months. One delay after another have caused the parties to fail to reach final agreement.  The immediate holdup, according to experts familiar with the details of the talks, is a sanction that the Trump administration put out in 2019 against a branch of the Iranian armed forces, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, that has designated them as a foreign terrorist organization.

The 2015 nuclear deal with Iran was Barack Obama’s biggest foreign policy achievement, and its violation was Donald Trump’s biggest foreign policy failure.  Returning to the agreement would achieve the goal of the JCPOA - namely to severely limit Iran's nuclear enrichment capabilities.  Bringing Iran's oil back into the world market would temper the exorbitantly high oil prices occasioned by the sanctions on Russia for its invasion of Ukraine.  Iran hawks in Congress working to thwart Biden's efforts are unlikely to prevail.  The congressional review process created in response to the JCPOA is a "negative mechanism," meaning the deal is adopted unless both houses effectively get veto-proof majorities to disapprove of it. [Sidebar]

French Elections

France's current president Emmanuel Macron will once again face far-right Marine LePen in a runoff election.  Neither secured the necessary 50% to be declared the first round winner.  Center-right Macron, who has emerged as the European Union’s strongest advocate and the most forceful defender of global progressivism, gathered 27.8% of the votes compared to LePen's 23.1%.  Just behind LePen was far-left candidate Jean-Luc Mélenchon with 22%.   

Adam Gopnik writing in The New Yorker gives Macron "a small but decisive edge" in the second round, but concludes his article with "Make no mistake: the election of Le Pen is still entirely possible—if indeed some significant part of the left either abstains or makes a burn-it-down move toward her. That would be a threat to the existence of the Republic in France, as Trump’s election was here." [Sidebar]

Russia - Ukraine Peace Talks Collapse

The negotiations between Russia and Ukraine have broken down, possibly for the last time.  Russia rejected Ukraine's latest proposal last week.  Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that Ukraine had presented Moscow with a draft peace deal containing "unacceptable" elements at variance with a previous agreement, comments that Kyiv dismissed as "pure propaganda".  On Tuesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin said peace negotiations with Ukraine reached a "dead end" and that Russia would continue its military operations.

60th Anniversary of the Cuban Embargo

February marked the 60th anniversary of the United States' embargo on Cuba.  Breaking the mold of previous administrations, Barack Obama began a normalization of relations with the island nation.  But in yet another vindictive foreign policy move, the Trump administration undid all the progress Obama achieved and imposed additional harsh restrictions.  The restrictions and embargo continued through the pandemic, with serious consequences for Cubans, jeopardizing the health and welfare of women, children, people living with cancer and HIV/AIDS.

Today, more than half a century since the embargo was put in place, the Biden administration continues to uphold this symbol of hostility between the U.S. and Cuba in the midst of the most challenging humanitarian crisis on the island since the 1990s*. Despite multiple campaign promises during the 2020 election campaign, the Biden administration has not advanced engagement policies with the island.   

In its 60 years, the embargo has utterly failed to achieve regime change in Cuba while crushing the Cuban economy and harming Cubans.  The Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) and the National Security Archive hosted a discussion with Cuba experts to examine why the embargo has endured until today, what its current impact is on Cuba’s economy and Cuba’s humanitarian crisis, and what steps the Biden Administration should take to stop the suffering caused by it. [Sidebar]

*The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989 led to additional hardships for the Cuban people as the American embargo on the island continued unabated.  During its existence, the Soviet Union had provided Cuba with large amounts of oil, food, and machinery tempering the effect of the embargo.  In the years following the Soviet Union's collapse, Cuba's gross domestic product shrunk 35%, imports and exports both fell over 80%, and many domestic industries shrank considerably.  The 1990's saw the exodus of tens of thousands of Cubans who fled the island by any means available.

World News Updates

POSTED May 31, 2022

A few recent news items you may not have caught on the evening news.

82 million at risk in East Africa as war in Ukraine exacerbates famine crisis [1]

Reeling from a prolonged drought and the pandemic, the nations of East Africa are facing one of the most severe famines in many years.  The situation has been exacerbated by the war in Ukraine which has driven up the costs of fuel and transportation and closed ports in the Black Sea.  Kenya and Somalia, two of the affected nations in the region import around 30 percent of their grain from Ukraine and Russia.  In addition, they are dependent on fertilizers, which risks affecting future harvests.  The UN's World Food Program estimates 82 million people are now at risk.

Colombia's presidential election headed to a runoff [2,3]

In spite of a terror campaign by right-wing paramilitaries, death threats against the leftist candidates for president and vice-president, and a smear campaign by Colombia's Army Chief, the far-right Duque government and the US State Department, leftist candidate Gustavo Petro led all candidates capturing more than 40% of the votes in the May 29th Colombian election.  

So far this year, 79 social leaders have been murdered in Colombia by illegal armed groups, and the left-wing ticket of Gustavo Petro and Francia Marquez had received death threats and were forced to campaign behind shields . Francia Márquez, vice presidential candidate for the left-wing Historic Pact coalition in Colombia, had her life threatened once again on the night of May 21. During a campaign rally at Journalists’ Park in the capital Bogotá, a laser was pointed at Márquez while she was on stage addressing a multitude of supporters. 

Next month, Petro will face a runoff against centrist populist Rodolfo Hernandez, who came in second with 28% of the vote.  It was a disappointment for Petro's ticket, as some polls showed them with a chance of winning the election on the first vote. If the Historic Pact ticket wins on June 19, it would break the decades-long rule of conservatives in the country, and Francia Marquez would become the first Afro-Colombian vice-president.

After racist "Flag March", far right Israeli squatters storm Palestinian Holy Sites, towns and schools [4,5,6]

On Sunday May 29, 70,000 far right Israeli extremists marched through Palestinian East Jerusalem as police locked down those city quarters, in honor of what they call “flag day,” which commemorates the 1967 Israeli military seizure of the Palestinian West Bank, Palestinian East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip.

At least 81 Palestinians were injured during and after the flag march, which marked the day Israel illegally occupied and annexed the city’s eastern half in 1967. Demonstrators chanted racist slogans including "death to Arabs" and "may your villages burn," The Times of Israel reported. Some called Palestinian journalists "whores" and "dogs," among other slurs. 

On Monday May 30 following the provocative march through Palestinian quarters, hundreds of Israeli squatters on Palestinian land organized taunting processions “of the flag” in various parts of the Occupied Palestinian West Bank under the protection of the Israeli army.  At the same time, attacks on Palestinians continued as dozens of squatters stormed the al-Aqsa Mosque compound from the Mughrabi Gate, under the protection of Israeli security police, who limited the access of Palestinian Muslims to their own mosque.  

Al Jazeera's video post on the flag march can be found here.  It was originally embedded in this post but then deemed "age-restricted" by YouTube and removed.  This act of censorship was unwarranted and political.  The violence depicted in the video pales by comparison to what is seen on the nightly news in coverage of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.  

Canada's Trudeau Proposes Strict New Gun Laws [7]

"The Texas attack so shocked a nation that it's considering aggressive gun action. Unfortunately for the country that suffered the attack, that country is Canada." 

- Podcast host Lulu Garcia-Navarro

Canada's Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau announced the government is "capping the number of handguns in this country," with any new sales, purchases, imports, and other transfers halted—a law that would likely take effect this autumn if the proposal is approved.  The handgun ban is part of Bill C-21, which would also take away the gun licenses of people who have committed domestic violence or forms of harassment including stalking.

Separately, the prime minister proposed a mandatory government buyback program for assault weapons.  The buyback program would begin by the end of 2022 and would include AR-15s, the type of gun used in the shooting in Uvalde an Buffalo.  Following the planned buyback of military-style assault weapons, Trudeau said, firearms like the AR-15 would automatically be banned if they enter the Canadian market in the future.

Sources: [1] Teller Report [2] GreenLeft, [3] CodePink, [4] Al Jazeera, [5] Informed Comment, [6] UPI, [7] Common Dreams

We have only two choices in Ukraine

POSTED JUNE 19, 2022

There continues to be a near total lack of diplomatic effort to end the conflict in Ukraine.  Intent on "making Russia suffer," NATO countries pour weapons into the conflict, Europe and America impose ever harsher sanctions,  Russia continues its assault, and people continue to die.  

In spite of the West's triumphalism and Russia's persistence, there will be no winners in this war.  I hope I'm wrong, but the invasion is beginning to look more and more like the Russian invasion of Afghanistan, which triggered a civil war that lasted for nine years and cost over 1 million lives before the Russians finally left.  Not that a civil war is going to break out in Ukraine, but there is no indication that Putin intends to withdraw from Eastern Ukraine any time soon.  

The only way to end this horror is by negotiation.

An interview with Noam Chomsky that appeared recently in TomDispatch concludes the same and adds  to the context given in an earlier WITW post, "Thinking about the tragedy unfolding in Ukraine" (Feb 27) 

On NATO's Eastward Expansion

On Zelensky's peace platform and what happened to it

On the two choices that we now have

Noam Chomsky bluntly concludes, "With near 100% unanimity, the United States and most of Europe want to pick the no-diplomacy option. It’s explicit. We have to keep going to hurt Russia."

On February 24, 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine.  The thoughts I offered three days later still stand:

There's much more to Alternative Radio's interview with Noam Chomsky and it's well worth the entire read. [link below] For decades, Chomsky has been an astute observer of global geopolitics and one of the most influential critics of American foreign policy.  The renowned linguist, historical essayist, and political activist will turn 94 later this year.  We should listen to him while we still can.


Related posts

"Ending Putin's War" (Mar 9)

"Thinking about the tragedy unfolding in Ukraine" (Feb 27) 

Colombia elects its first-ever leftist president and Neoliberalism takes a blow in France

POSTED JUNE 23, 2022

This past Sunday, Colombia elected the first leftist president in its history, and French voters dealt a blow to Emmanuel Macron's neoliberal agenda.

Colombia

The presidential runoff election between Gustavo Petro and Rodolfo Hernández ended with a victory for the ticket of a united Left.  In spite of death threats and smear campaigns, the Historic Pact coalition team of Petro and his vice-presidential running mate Francia Márquez defeated Hernández, a millionaire real estate mogul by 50.4% to 47.3%.  Aided by a record turnout, it was a wider margin than expected.  In another first, environmental activist Francia Márquez Mina became the country’s first Black vice president.

Petro's showing was the latest leftist political victory in Latin America.  Fueled by voters' desire for change, Chile, Peru and Honduras elected leftist presidents in 2021, and in Brazil, former President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is leading the polls for this year's presidential election.

Replacing the right-wing government of Iván Duque, Petro and Márquez ran on a platform that vowed to fight worsening poverty and inequality in Colombia by raising taxes on the rich, expanding social programs as well as access to education and healthcare. Petro has called on Colombia to halt new oil extraction and to move away from an economy long dependent on fossil fuel. Petro has also said his government plans to restore relations with Venezuela and renegotiate a trade deal with the United States to better benefit Colombians.  In addition, he wants to change the way drug trafficking is fought.  He's proposed replacing the forced eradication of coca plants with an expansion of crop substitution programs to provide credit, training and land rights to rural farmers.

The reset in relations with the United States, which has long-been a supporter of the Colombian right-wing, may actually be easier than accomplishing the Historic Pact's domestic objectives.  Standing in the way of achieving the promised peace, social justice and environmental justice are a conservative-controlled legislature, an entrenched establishment, and a pervasive corruption at every level of government as well as in the military and police.

France

Across the pond, French President Emmanuel Macron's centrist grouping lost its absolute majority in parliament, with parties on the left as well as the far-right picking up seats. Final results showed Macron’s centrists taking 245 seats, well short of the 289 required for an absolute majority.  

Since his election in 2017, Macron has steadily drifted to the right.  He has campaigned on raising the retirement age by three years to 65 and diluting France’s generous social benefits system — for example forcing welfare recipients to work and raising college tuition fees.  Macron’s electoral defeat was seen as a strong rebuke from French voters over his ambitious pro-business plans and throws into doubt his domestic agenda.  

A left-wing coalition led by Jean-Luc Mélenchon won 131 seats, but the most striking result of the night came for Marine Le Pen’s far-right, anti-immigration National Rally party, which increased its number of seats from eight in 2017 to 89.  Le Pen's transformation of her party's image from fringe extremists to a normalized opposition has seemingly taken hold.

Macron will now have to form a new majority if France is to avoid legislative gridlock.  It is possible that he will seek to form an alliance with the center-right Republicans to assemble a majority to pass legislation, though Christian Jacob, the Republicans’ parliamentary leader, said his deputies would not back Macron’s agenda. 

World News Foreign Affairs Update

POSTED JULY 21, 2022

Ethiopia [1, 2, 3]

The 20-month war in Ethiopia may be coming to an end, but ethnic violence is rising and the humanitarian crisis is continuing.  Rebels in the Ethiopian region of Tigray have set up a team of negotiators to discuss peace, a spokesman for the rebels announced Monday July 19. This comes almost a month after federal authorities named a team of seven negotiators for possible peace talks. 

As many as 500,000 people have died from war and famine in the Tigray region of northern Ethiopia. The war began when Ethiopia sent its military into Tigray in an attempt to subdue the rebellious regional government in November, 2020. The neighboring country of Eritrea also sent troops into Tigray, and the war has led to massacres of civilians, destruction of hospitals and clinics, an exodus of refugees and the emergence of famine.  The Ethiopian government had been accused of blocking food supplies to the region. 

Conflict between the TPLF and the Ethiopian government has virtually ceased since a March humanitarian truce, but ethnic violence continues.  Rebel fighters are accused of a June 18 massacre of hundreds of civilians in Amhara, which had supported the federal forces in the fight against TPLF.  Protests have erupted across Ethiopia decrying the government's inability to stop the rising ethnic violence.

The war in Ukraine has had a doubly bad effect on the region by interrupting food supplies from Ukraine and Russia and by reducing global attention and humanitarian aid for long-running (and more devastating) conflicts in the Middle East and Africa.


Global Heat Wave [4, 5, 6]

In June and July, heatwaves struck Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, and Asia, as temperatures climbed above 40 degrees Celsius (104 degrees Fahrenheit) in places and broke many long-standing records. In Western Europe, which was already experiencing severe drought, the heatwave fueled fires that raged across Portugal, Spain, and parts of France.  

Italy has been baking in an early summer heatwave, and, in the Italian Dolomite Mountains, tragedy struck on July 3 when a glacier collapsed on the highest peak in the range – Marmolada – killing at least seven people.  The tragedy occurred one day after a record-high temperature of 10 degrees Celsius (50 degrees Fahrenheit) was recorded at the summit of the glacier, which has been rapidly melting over the past decades, with much of its volume gone.

In the UK, weather stations across the country recorded their highest temperatures ever on Tuesday July 20.  So far, the heat wave in Europe has killed upwards of 2000 people.  The U.K. Met Office warned that unless society sharply alters course, 40°C days in a country largely devoid of air conditioning will become events that occur every few years.  

These globe-spanning heat waves are another warning of how out of control climate-driven events have become and how ill-prepared we are to deal with them.  Meanwhile, international conflicts are causing an energy crisis that is possibly extending the lifetime, of fossil-fuel burning power plants and infrastructure around the world.  At the same time, political stalemates in Washington have made it unlikely for the Biden administration to advance its agenda to slash greenhouse gas emissions.  In the face of these realities, the heat wave is "a reminder that Mother Nature doesn't care about a West Virginia senator's concerns over inflation."

Biden's  Middle East Trip [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]

I didn't expect much from President Biden's trip to the Middle East, but it was even worse than I thought it would be.  Prior to the trip, the Biden Administration whitewashed the Israeli Defense Force's killing of Palestinian-American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh [link below] and rejected a request by Shireen Abu Akleh’s family to meet with him during his visit to Israel.  

Aside from increasing America’s chummy relations with the apartheid state of Israel and a vague promise of an increase in Saudi oil production after OPEC's meeting in August, the US President and his White House team failed on numerous fronts.

Human rights suffered a setback as Biden infamously fist bumped Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman.  MBS and other Saudi officials have never been held accountable for the 2018 killing of dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi.   The publisher of The Washington Post, Fred Ryan, criticized Biden, saying, “The fist bump between President Biden and Mohammed bin Salman was worse than a handshake — it was shameful. It projected a level of intimacy and comfort that delivers to MBS the unwarranted redemption he has been desperately seeking.” Senator Bernie Sanders was more blunt and expansive: "Look, you’ve got a family that is worth $100 billion, which crushes democracy, which treats women as third-class citizens, which murders and imprisons its opponents. And if this country believes in anything, we believe in human rights, we believe in democracy. And I just don’t believe that we should be maintaining a warm relationship with a dictatorship like that."

Israel's accountability for its human rights and international law violations, of course, was not mentioned.* After whitewashing Shireen Abu Akleh's killing and rejecting a meeting with the murdered journalist's family, Biden had the gall to say the United States would continue to defend "media freedom" in his meeting with Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.  As for the two-state solution, Biden explained his inaction by saying that the time was not right to restart negotiations. Not the right time? The last time the US sat down with the two sides was in 2013 - 2014, when Secretary of State John Kerry's efforts to achieve a two-state solution were deliberately thwarted by the Israeli right.

Biden had also hoped to get the Saudis to normalize relations with Israel.  The topic was not even brought up at the Jeddah Security and Development Summit.  Other than Bahrain and the UAE who have normalized relations with Israel, every Arab leader in the summit stuck to their principled Palestinian stance regarding independent statehood and the two-state solution, a concept that Biden and the American administration say they accept despite the fact that he already told the Palestinians when he met Abbas that the time is not ripe to kick-start the Israeli-Palestinian negotiating process. 

A last fail was on his attempt to whip up an anti-Iranian stance among the Gulf countries - perhaps in hope that it would bring Iran to accept the additional conditions the US is insisting on imposing in the nuclear deal.  The Gulf countries want a  rapprochement with Tehran and believe that a conciliatory approach would be better than an abrasive one with a possibility of a direct strike on Iran.  While Israel may be eager for such an action, no Arab nation wants any part of it.  Even Iran's biggest rival in the region, Saudi Arabia, is currently talking to Iran in Baghdad.`

Related Post: Biden's appallingly unimaginative and failing foreign policy - February 6, 2022


Note: *I expressed my disappointment Biden's failure to hold Israel accountable for its treatment of the Palestinians in a "Contact the White House" email.  The White House's canned response included the obvious but misleading sentiment so engrained in US politics: "the United States is committed to Israel’s security and fully supports Israel’s right to defend itself against indiscriminate attacks from Hamas and other Gaza-based terrorist groups, which have taken the lives of innocent civilians in Israel."  Terrorist attacks of all types must be condemned as should war crimes including those of the Israeli Defense Forces.  The IDF has killed orders of magnitude more innocent Palestinian civilians in their indiscriminate and over-reactive attacks against Gaza. Related Post: Gaza blockade reaches 15 years 

Sources: [1] Monitor (Uganda) [2] Globe and Mail [3] Al Jazeera - 1 [4] NASA Earth Observatory [5] Axios [6] Al Jazeera - 2 [7] Eurasia Review [8] Democracy Now! - 1 [9] NDTV (Agence France-Presse) [10] Democracy Now! - 2 [11] Democracy Now! - 3

World News Updates: The Americas

POSTED AUGUST 16, 2022

Haiti is wracked with chaos as a recent upsurge in gang warfare has claimed hundreds of Haitian lives and displaced thousands in the capital Port-au-Prince and the surrounding area.  The heavy turf war has been raging for months now, but it has become more intense and widespread in the past few weeks, paralyzing most of the country.  For years, Haiti's political elites used gangs to achieve their own objectives, silence dissent, and confront their rivals. In July, a string of arms-trafficking scandals in Haiti, including the discovery of weapons in a shipping container labeled as church donations, prompted the UN Security Council to push for international cooperation to stop the flow guns from the United States into Haiti.  The G9 have blocked the port, where most of the imported goods enter the country, exacerbating a food and fuel crisis. [1]

Canada, which has already banned over 1,500 models of assault-style firearms, temporarily banned the import of restricted handguns from Aug. 19 in a move designed to indirectly achieve goals of a gun control legislation proposed in May.  The import ban will stay in place until a national freeze on handguns comes into force.  One of the concerns is that because of thy are easily concealed, hand guns from the United States will still find their way into Canada. [2]

Chile elected its youngest ever president, Gabriel Boric, a thirty-five-year-old leftist congressman in December with 56% of the vote against a far-right candidate.  Boric’s election came after two years of massive peaceful demonstrations in Chile over inequality, the high cost of living and privatization.  Those demonstrations also led to a demand for a new Constitution to replace the one from the time of Pinochet's military dictatorship. The Chilean constitutional convention has now completed its work.  The product of the convention is a visionary document that would update, expand and advance Chileans’ basic rights – to health, housing,  decent work and a habitable planet [sidebar]. Passage of the constitution in the September 3 nationwide referendum is uncertain.  The latest polls show approval of the new constitution trailing by 10 points.  Boric has promised a new Constitutional Convention if it fails in the referendum. [4, 5]

Colombia's first ever leftist president was inaugurated on August 7.  Replacing the right-wing government of Iván Duque, Gustavo Petro ran on a platform that vowed to fight worsening poverty and inequality in Colombia by raising taxes on the rich, expanding social programs as well as access to education and healthcare.  Petro also formed alliances with environmentalists during his presidential campaign and has promised to turn Colombia into a “global powerhouse for life” by slowing deforestation and taking steps to reduce the country’s reliance on fossil fuels. Concluding peace talks with the remaining rebel groups, re-establishing relations with Venezuela, and replacing the failed war on drugs with a coca crop replacement effort are also high priorities for the new president.   On Wednesday, Petro named new commanders to head Colombia’s military and police as part of a push to bring peace to the country. Petro said he picked commanders who had never been accused of human rights violations. [6.7]

In another first, Honduras's first woman president was inaugurated on January 27. Xiomara Castro’s presidency marks the end of a brutal 12-year regime by the U.S.-backed right-wing National Party, which first came to power after the 2009 U.S.-backed coup that overthrew Castro’s husband, former leftist President Manuel Zelaya. During her inaugural speech, Castro ordered free electricity for Hondurans living in extreme poverty, vowed justice for murdered land and water defenders, and said her government will not continue to loot Honduras: “Poverty increased by 74% to make us the poorest country in Latin America. This figure by itself explains the migrant caravan of thousands of people of all ages who flee to the north, Mexico and the United States, looking for a place and a way to subsist, regardless of risk it implies for their lives.”  Her predecessor, Juan Orlando Hernández, was a longtime U.S. ally, in power from 2014 until January 27 of this year.  In April, he was extradited to the United States to face weapons and drug charges. Castro is facing a difficult challenge as she tries to cleanup the corruption and address the human rights abuses that have plagued the country.  Increasing food and fuel prices have also aggravated the situation.  "Radical change is unlikely, and chronic crises will endure. But it seems that meaningful change is slowly materializing." [8, 9, 10]

Brazil officially kicked off its presidential campaign Tuesday.  In one of the most polarized campaigns in decades, Brazil’s popular left-wing former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva holds a double-digit lead over far-right incumbent Jair Bolsonaro.  Brazilian democracy faces a moment of “immense danger”, a manifesto signed by almost a million citizens has warned amid growing fears president Jair Bolsonaro could refuse to accept defeat in October’s election. The declaration comes after Bolsonaro escalated his attacks on Brazil’s voting system and summoned hardcore supporters to hit the streets “for the last time” before the 2 October vote.  Bolsonaro’s actions have fueled fears the radical far-right populist may seek to emulate his political idol, Donald Trump, by contesting the election result or inciting a January 6-style insurrection in a bid to retain power. [11, 12]


References: [1] DW, [2] Reuters - 1, [3] Public Safety Canada, [4] The Guardian - 1, [5] Reuters- 2, [6] PBS, [7] Democracy Now! -1 [8] Democracy Now! - 2 [9] BBC [10] Americas Quarterly [11] Al Jazeera [12] The Guardian - 2, Wikipedia

Above: Port-au-Prince, Haiti - August 2022


Chile has come a long way... 

...since the United States aided in the 1973 overthrow of its elected president, Socialist  Salvador Allende,.  The military coup ended Chile's long stretch of free elections, and installed Augusto Pinochet's as a military dictator who would rule for 17 years.  Pinochet's reign was marked by crimes against humanity, persecution of opponents, political repression, and state terrorism.  More than 27,000 people were tortured;  2,279 were executed; 200,000 suffered exile;  and an unknown number went through clandestine centers and illegal detention. 

Post-script: During Trump's time in office, Bolsonaro, Orbán and he were the most right-wing leaders on their respective continents.   In a telling episode earlier this month, Hungarian strongman Viktor Orbán addressed the assembled hoard of Trump loyalists and various other wingnuts of the right at Texas CPAC.   The president of Europe's most conservative and authoritarian country this side of Russia brought the house to its feet with his assertion that his nationalist agenda in Hungary aligns with the goals of the American conservative movement.  I'm sure it does.  One of Orbán's signature achievements, after all, was to make it almost impossible for the opposition to defeat his party at the ballot box.  


Related: A cautionary tale: Viktor Orbán's Hungary (April 7)

Brazil's Jair Bolsonaro with Hungary's Viktor Orbán

Ukraine is becoming Russia's Vietnam

POSTED SEPTEMBER 30, 2022

Russia invaded Ukraine after NATO and the United States refused to negotiate on Ukraine neutrality and instead escalated their arms shipments to the region.  As this preventable and senseless war entered its eighth month, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a partial mobilization of military reservists in Russia.  The mobilization announcement initiated another round of antiwar protests in Russia, reminiscent of our own country's experience in the massive protests against the Vietnam War six decades ago.  Russian men are heading to the borders just as many in the US went to Canada to avoid fighting and killing in another unjustifiable war.

The government responded to the protests with a brutal police crackdown, mass arrests, and threats to send protesters to fight in Ukraine. Can anyone say "Chicago 1968"?  

Although the US antiwar movement of the '60's forced Lyndon Baines Johnson to withdraw from the 1968 election, the Vietnam War continued for another seven years under Presidents Nixon and Ford.  The mobilization order has sent Russia into turmoil, but it is not likely to mean the end of Putin's rein, and neither the mobilization nor the protests are going to change the war in Ukraine.  A negotiated settlement may have been pushed even further out of reach as Putin declared the annexation of four regions of eastern Ukraine. [link below]

Related: We have only two choices in Ukraine (June 19, 2022)

War in Ukraine enters its ninth month

POSTED OCTOBER 29, 2022

As the casualties and the devastation in the war in Ukraine mount, diplomacy appears to have taken a permanent exit from the stage.  A war that negotiations could have been prevented [Thinking about the tragedy unfolding in Ukraine - Feb 27] and that negotiations may have stopped after one month of fighting [link below] seems destined to continue into the foreseeable future because of the same failure to negotiate.  

As Russia continues its assault, there is no sign of any willingness on the part of Ukraine or the West to even consider a diplomatic solution, possibly the only thing that will stop the war [We have only two choices in Ukraine - June 19].  

In the West, the voices calling for a negotiated end to the war are outnumbered by the media wogs and politicians calling for  more arms shipments.  In Russia, antiwar activists are being suppressed by the state.  Nonetheless. there are some points of sanity and light in the darkness of this war, and it may not be too late to put an end to the bloodshed by negotiation.  

Democracy Now!  gives these points of sanity and light a much-needed voice in the media:

Lula defeats Bolsonaro in Brazil's presidential runoff

NOVEMBER 2, 2022

In a victory for the people of Brazil and for Planet Earth, leftist presidential candidate Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva won Brazil’s runoff election, ousting far-right President Jair Bolsonaro after just one term.  Lula garnered 60 million votes, the most in Brazilian history, but as of this writing, Bolsonaro has not conceded or congratulated him on his victory.  It was the latest in a string of victories for the Latin American Left, and it completed the political comeback of Lula, who had been kept from running in 2018 by trumped up charges later thrown out by the Brazilian Supreme Court. 

Addressing supporters in São Paulo on Sunday night, Lula said, "On this historic October 30th, the majority of Brazilians made it very clear that they want more and not less democracy, that they want more and not less social inclusion, that they want more and not less opportunity for all, they want more and not less respect and understanding among Brazilians. To summarize, they want more freedom, equality, fraternity in our country."


In an interview with Democracy Now! [sidebar], Brazilian socialist organizer Sabrina Fernandes says Lula is trying to return democratic normality to Brazil after four years of Bolsonaro’s environmental destruction, COVID denial and undermining of the country’s institutions. Lula’s victory is also a win for Indigenous peoples, whose sovereignty was disregarded under Bolsonaro amid rampant deforestation of the Amazon rainforest.

Lula, who heads the Workers’ Party, served as Brazil’s president from 2003 to 2010. During his time in office, he helped lift tens of millions of Brazilians out of poverty. But in 2018 as he prepared to run for office again he was jailed on trumped-up corruption charges, paving the way for the election of Bolsonaro. 

The resurgence of the Latin American Left is a rejection of Western neoliberalism and the resulting inequalities and social exclusions as well as a rejection of the US policies that have been so harmful to the region.  Over the last four years, throughout Latin America, right-wing governments, firmly established for almost two decades, have been replaced by socialist and social democratic ones. Besides Lula's win:

Reminiscent of the "Pink Tide" that swept through Latin Americas from the late 1990's through the early 2010's, the election of leftist presidents pr0mise a return to more equitable social conditions and, particularly in Brazil, policies to slow climate change.  After Biden's embarrassingly failed Summit of the Americas earlier this year and the continuing victories by leftists, the message is clear: Latin America will no longer abide the United States' domination of the region, and the 60-year embargo on Cuba [sidebar], the crushing sanctions against Venezuela [sidebar], and the newly imposed sanctions against Nicaragua must end.  

Two closing thoughts:

The humanitarian impact of sanctions on the people of the sanctioned country far exceeds the ability of sanctions to affect regime change, which is close to zero.  Although portrayed as a kinder, gentler option than war, they result in devastating impacts on the health and well-being of communities. [sidebar]

The myth that the United States imposes sanctions in the name of democracy and human rights is belied by a century of intervention and its support of dictatorships of the right in Latin America.  

Dawn of a new era of US imperialism in Latin America (Nov 15, 2018)

Latin America Update: Ending the Monroe Doctrine (Oct 25, 2020)


Sources: Democracy Now!, Al Jazeera

COP 27's successes, disappointments and the unfinished business of stopping global warming

POSTED NOVEMBER 25, 2022

After two weeks of deliberations, COP 27, the UN's annual climate summit, concluded last Friday.  The consensus of climate experts, success in establishing the "loss and damage" fund and disappointment at the failure to agree on phaseout of fossil fuels,  is summarized by Democracy Now!:

Rich countries agreed to establish a “loss and damage” fund at the close of the two-week-long U.N. climate summit in Egypt to help the Global South deal with the worst effects of the climate catastrophe. The fund is a major breakthrough for Global South countries, which have been demanding a similar mechanism for the past 30 years but faced opposition from the United States and other large polluting nations. Climate justice activist Asad Rehman says the fund is a “glimmer of hope” despite the summit ending with a massive expansion of carbon markets and delegates making “no progress” to phase out fossil fuels.

First, then, the successes.

Now, the disappointments and unfinished business

The planet, unfortunately, is on track to smash through the tipping point for climate change, 1.5 C temperature rise above pre-industrial temperatures. If global average temperatures rise above this level, the effects will be serious, synergistically re-enforcing, and irreversible.  To avoid exceeding this temperature, we have to basically halve our emissions by 2030 to be able to be at zero by 2050. We have got less than five to 10 years of the current carbon budget if we want to limit temperatures below 1.5. The latest synthesis report said we’ve only reduced our emissions in terms of the Nationally Determined Compositions (NDCs), the plans that governments have got in place, by 0.3%.   Another report from Accenture found that one-third (34%) of the world’s largest companies are now committed to net zero, but nearly all (93%) will fail to achieve their goals if they don’t at least double the pace of emissions reduction by 2030. (EDF)

Progress was made at COP27, but not enough for the planet to meet the 1.5 C temperature rise maximum target.   Unless there is a massive shift in political will, more commitment and more action, the consequences will be drastic.

COP 27 begins as the planet hurtles towards the climate change "tipping point" - November 8


Notes:

*The amount of CO2 produced when a fuel is burned is a function of the carbon content of the fuel. The heat content or the amount of energy produced when a fuel is burned is mainly determined by the carbon (C) and hydrogen (H) content of the fuel.  Natural gas produces the least CO2 per unit o energy delivered.  Propane produces approximately 20% more CO2 than natural gas; oil and gasoline, approximately 35% more; and coal 80-85% more. (AGI)

A right-wing resurgence? (Part I)

POSTED JANUARY 3, 2023

Last year, as the Left continued to pile up electoral victories across Latin America, the Right made significant gains across Europe.  And at year-end, topping off the year for the Right, Israel put in power the most far-right, extremist government in its history.  What should we make of these developments?  Is there really any threat of fascism becoming "a thing" again?  Does this portend anything for the United States where one of the two major political parties has given up all pretense of a commitment to democracy?

In this post, we'll examine what happened and why in the 2022 elections in Israel, Italy, and France.  In a future post, we'll look at what this might mean for the US policies and the 2024 elections.

Israel.  [1], [2]

On Thursday December 29, Benjamin Netanyahu, who is on trial facing a corruption indictment, took the oath of office to again serve as prime minister, this time leading the most far-right and religiously conservative coalition in the country's history.  The parallels of the situation of the indicted right-wing leader with that of hopefully-soon-to-be-indicted Donald Trump should give us all pause. 

Some ministry appointments were only possible because of a pair of laws passed by the Knesset  - one enabling Aryeh Deri of Shas to serve as minister of the interior despite his recent tax fraud conviction and another allowing Religious Zionism's Bezalel Smotrich to take on multiple posts.  "These laws... dovetail with Netanyahu's own attempt to escape potential liability for his long-running corruption/bribery trial," wrote Mondoweiss' Jonathan Ofir.

Netanyahu's coalition features "a mix of an ultra-Orthodox and right-wing bloc," with some of the most "right-wing politicians we've seen," Al Jazeera's Sara Khairat reported from West Jerusalem, as protesters gathered. "They were on the fringes of politics and now here they are on the main stage."  

Palestinians, of course, have the most to worry about. 

Among the priorities of the new government will be the further expansion of the illegal settlements on Palestinian lands.

Israeli human rights advocacy groups are sounding the alarm, calling the coalition "disastrous for human rights between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea...Previous Israeli governments have already entrenched military control over millions of Palestinians, severely harmed their human rights, and made the possibility of a just future more difficult...The senior figures in this new government have made it clear that they intend to exacerbate this trend and advance dangerous measures."

The organizations—including Adalah, B'Tselem, Breaking the Silence, Peace Now, and Physicians for Human Rights Israel (PHRI)—warned that "the occupation and apartheid in the occupied Palestinian territories have made Jewish supremacy the de facto law of the land and the new government seeks to adopt this into their official policy."

Since the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin [sidebar below], Israel has been on a downwards Palestinian human rights spiral so the election of this far-right coalition comes as no surprise.  

What is a surprise is what may happen to the rights of the Israeli LGBTQ community due to the ultra-orthodox component of the coalition.  Three hundred former Israeli soldiers have written a letter to their new government pleading with it not to inflict harm on the LGBTQ community. At the same time, two prominent rabbis close to the new government launched an attack on the Knesset members who voted in Amir Ohana, who is gay, as the speaker of parliament. 

Netanyahu has allegedly agreed with the extremist Religious Zionism and Jewish Power blocs to change anti-discrimination laws in Israel to allow Jewish fundamentalist businesses and professionals not to serve gay people or groups of women and men who are not practicing gender segregation.  Netanyahu denies that he will permit such discrimination, but who knows?

The United States apparently will continue its docile role as Israel's ally and enabler.  President Biden congratulated Benjamin Netanyahu on his return to power, saying he looks forward to working with Israel’s new government. Biden referred to Netanyahu as his “friend for decades,” adding, “the United States will continue to support the two state solution and to oppose policies that endanger its viability or contradict our mutual interests and values.”  

Hollow words. The two-state solution will only become a reality when the United States condemns Israel's violations of international law, apartheid policies, and war crimes - something we have never done in spite of the vast leverage we have: the United States has given Israel $146 billion in aid, nearly all of it military. Although one of the stated purposes of all this military aid has been to make Israel feel secure enough to allow the Palestinians a homeland, this  has had just the opposite effect.  [sidebar]

Rather, the United States role for many decades has been to enable the Israeli crimes against the Palestinians. Will the extremist government now in power open the eyes of the Biden Administration and the foreign policy establishment? In an interview with Democracy Now! [sidebar], Diana Buttu, a Palestinian lawyer and former adviser to the PLO negotiating team, and Israeli journalist Gideon Levy strike a pessimistic note as they assess decades of US complicity:

Buttu: "Israel has been allowed to do whatever it wants when it comes to killing Palestinians, when it comes to stealing Palestinian land, when it comes to ethnic cleansing. When it comes to crossing the red lines that are enshrined in international law, Israel is allowed to get away with it — and not only get away with it, but continues to receive support and financial support from the United States, as well."

Levy: "The United States is supporting the apartheid system, is very interested in continuing the occupation and has no interest in human rights of the Palestinians. There’s no other way to describe the American position throughout decades, because would it be different, would the United States seriously mean to put an end to the occupation, the occupation could have come to its end years ago, if not decades ago."

Italy [3], [4] [7]

If the far-right takeover in Israel just continued a decades long trend, the return of far-right political parties to power in Italy was a shocker.  As the Italian center and left failed to coalesce around a single candidate or position, far-right Giorgia Meloni of the Brothers of Italy Party became the country's first female prime minister, winning around 26% of the vote, ahead of her closest rival Enrico Letta from the center left.   

Meloni's right-wing alliance - which also includes Matteo Salvini's far-right League and former PM Silvio Berlusconi's center-right Forza Italia - will take control of both the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies, with around 44% of the vote.  Four years ago, Brothers of Italy won little more than 4% of the vote but this time benefited from staying out of the national unity government that collapsed in July.  Their dramatic success in the vote this year disguised the fact that her allies performed poorly, with the League slipping below 9%, and Forza Italia even lower.

Although Meloni has worked hard to soften her image, emphasizing her support for Ukraine and diluting anti-EU rhetoric, she leads a party rooted in a post-war movement that rose out of dictator Benito Mussolini's fascists.  Earlier this year she outlined her priorities in a raucous speech to Spain's far-right Vox party: "Yes to the natural family, no to the LGBT lobby, yes to sexual identity, no to gender ideology... no to Islamist violence, yes to secure borders, no to mass migration... no to big international finance... no to the bureaucrats of Brussels!"  Hmm, sounds somewhat like many of the Republican Party talking points less the threat of vote suppression and overturning elections that don't go their way.

Inflation concerns, rising energy costs, and the feeling that the Italian government, the second most indebted in Europe, was not doing enough to help those struggling were key issues for the Italian voters.  Meloni was also aided by record low turnout with enthusiastic supporters going to the polls and others like disaffected youth staying home.  Nationally, turnout was an historic low, down from 72% in 2018 to 64%, with no region in the south, a stronghold of her support, exceeding 60% turnout. 

Forming a stable government that lasts the five years of her term will be difficult. How long will Meloni last in office in a country noted for the brevity of their administrations (2-1/2 years average since the end of WWII) once her alliance has to deal with the reality of the economic issues?  Meloni has already had to retrench on some of her campaign promises to stay in compliance with EU financial rules, and Europe's third largest economy will not be leaving the EU anytime soon.

For now, the biggest risk is to the migrants from North Africa.  Italy's government has been criticised for introducing new rules that will limit the sea rescue capacity of NGOs and charities. Rescue ships must now request a port immediately after each individual rescue, and sail immediately to it once it has been assigned.  Charities not abiding by the rules risk fines of up to €50,000 and could have their vessels impounded for repeat offenses.  Organizations that rescue migrants in the Mediterranean Sea say the measures will put lives at risk. 

Is there a greater risk across Europe from the right with Meloni's ascendance? Meloni and her party are new comers to the scene.  Others like Viktor Orbán of Hungary and Marine Le Pen of France have been around much longer.  Meloni''s Brothers of Italy party is allied with Spain’s far-right Vox party, Poland’s ruling nationalist Law and Justice party and the Sweden Democrats party, which emerged out of its neo-Nazi movement, and some observers see Meloni as part of a “transnational design” to create a far-right political culture across Europe.  Given the instability of past Italian governments, it's unclear that Meloni's party will be in power long enough to become an important part of these fringe groups.  And there are rising young stars on the Italian Left that may restore some energy to that part of the political spectrum. [sidebar]

France [5], [6]

While Viktor Orbán of Hungary has just about completed his assault on democratic institutions there and looks  set to become Hungary's prime minister for life [sidebar], Marine Le Pen’s far-right, anti-immigration National Rally party, which increased its number of seats from eight in 2017 to 89.  Le Pen's transformation of her party's image from fringe extremists to a normalized opposition has seemingly taken hold.  

It's unclear what issues drove the resurgence of Le Pen's party, but dissatisfaction with Macron's centrist, neoliberal leadership appears to be a good bet: a left-wing coalition led by Jean-Luc Mélenchon won 131 seats.   Denied an absolute majority by the gains on the far-left and far-right, Macron is struggling to keep his coalition alive.  

In September, his party changed its name to Renaissance. While the president hoped to create a single party with his allies, only two small satellite parties will merge with the former La République en Marche.

In October, Macron's government survived two no-confidence votes introduced by the right and by the left.  The votes were prompted by opposition lawmakers to protest the use of a special constitutional power to force the budget bill through the National Assembly without a vote.  The debate at the National Assembly came after weeks of wage strikes that have hobbled fuel refineries and depots, sparking gasoline shortages.  Last week, tens of thousands of protesters took to the streets, asking for pay hikes that keep pace with inflation. The left-wing CGT union called for two other days of “national mobilization”.  

The new year will see the Macron government dealing with numerous issues [sidebar], none more thorny than the proposed raising of retirement age from 62 to 65.  by 2031 - a campaign promise but a measure to which the French are nevertheless opposed to 67%, according to an Odoxa poll for Public Senate.

Sources: [1] Informed Comment ,  [2] Common Dreams, [3] BBC [4] Euronews [5] Le Monde [6] France 24 [7] Left Voice

A right-wing resurgence? (Part II - Brazil's "January 6" Moment and the International Far-Right)

POSTED JANUARY 9, 2023

Brazil just had its January 6 moment.  Stirred up by false allegations of voting irregularities, a crowd of supporters of former far-right President Jair Bolsonaro stormed the Brazilian Congress, Supreme Court and presidential palace Sunday January 8 in a scene reminiscent of the U.S. Capitol insurrection. Rioters smashed windows, ransacked offices and set fire to a carpet inside the Congress building before authorities made over 400 arrests.  Bolsonaro has never formally conceded the race to third-term President Lula and fled to Florida, where he has reportedly met with Donald Trump at Mar-A-Lago, while his supporters have blockaded highways and set up protest encampments outside military bases and in the capital Brasília to protest what they falsely claim was a rigged election. 

President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who was not in the capital at the time, condemned Sunday’s attempt to overthrow his government by what he called “fanatical fascists” and promised to hold those responsible accountable: "I’m going to return to Brasília now. I’m going to visit the three sites that were damaged — be assured that this will not be repeated — to discover who financed this, who paid for their stay, and they will have to pay the price under the law."

Bad as the MAGA mob's attack on the Capitol was, the Bolsonaro backers in Brasilia outdid them.  Besides the Congress building, they stormed the Supreme Court and the presidential palace.  In addition, they have been protesting on military sites, demanding that the military intervene and install a military dictatorship of the far-right.

In an interview with Democracy Now!'s Amy Goodman [link in sidebar], Brazilian newspaper columnist and professor Thiago Amparo notes another difference, "In the United States, they were trying to - at least rhetorically - prevent the certification of the U.S. election of Joe Biden.  In Brazil, what happened, basically, Lula was already certified and is already the president of Brazil. So, what’s the goal of the invaders? It’s still all under debate, but probably what they are trying to do first is to show their strength, but, secondly, even to overthrow the...power of the president, Lula." 

Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon praised the Brazilian rioters as did one of the January 6th Insurrection organizers, Ali Alexander.  On the same segment of Democracy Now!,  reporter Michael Fox, host of the “Brazil on Fire” podcast pointed to the connection between Bolsonaro, Trump, far-right Trump supporters and Steve Bannon.  Bolsonaro's son "Eduardo Bolsonaro is the head of Steve Bannon’s The Movement, his international far-right group, to try and foment exactly what’s happening in Brazil right now across Latin America."  

Fox noted the "great difference between January 6th and...this situation, namely the role of the military and the power of the military historically in Brazil" - Brazil endured a military dictatorship for 21 years until 1985; and warned that Steve Bannon is part of a much larger far-right network that is sharing experiences and trying to export around the world. this tactic of attempting to violently overturn elections.   

As for the larger "far-right network" that Fox speaks about, we should look no further than the 2022 CPAC Convention which featured Hungarian strongman Viktor Orban as a headline speaker.  Once a conference for the activist fringe, the hard-right Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) has enjoyed an increasing amount of influence within the American conservative movement in recent years.  Donald Trump’s MAGA movement shifted the center of gravity of today’s GOP toward a more nakedly extremist, conspiratorial, and anti-democratic  “populism,” thus placing CPAC firmly within the mainstream of the Republican party.   As it becomes more mainstream here at home, CPAC has been undergoing its own ideological and political realignment, increasingly focusing its energies internationally.

Far-right organizations and parties are converging around a common agenda of ethnonationalism, patriarchy, and opposition to "the Marxist cultural agenda" of democratically elected left-leaning governments.  This internationalist turn has helped deepen alliances between a coalition of hard-right political parties, activists, and national leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, all sharing a common interest in anti-immigrant, identitarian*, and deeply illiberal approaches to governance.  

The coalition of hard-right parties and organizations has been dubbed by some commentators  as the Nationalist International.   They and the international alt-right should concern American progressives and antifascists.  Even though Trump is no longer in office, let's remember that he won 74 million votes in 2020, and that 20 million of those voters believe both that Joe Biden is an illegitimate president and that violence would be justified to make Trump presidentExtremism researcher Cathrine Thorleifsson has written that “it is evident that the fascist new order and the regeneration of the ultra-nation** are conceived in transnational terms of European or Western renewal as a whole, thus promoting violent action globally.”  Trump's brand of ultranationalism that he helped foster in this and other countries is here for the foreseeable future.  [link in sidebar]

The danger to democracy in America is real.   Fascist and racist sentiment will take a giant leap forward (again) should Trump or a Trumpist win the 2024 election.  Assuming one does not want to participate in the more confrontational activities of the anti-fascist movement, what can one do? Some thoughts are in the sidebar.


Notes: 

*The Identitarian movement is a pan-European nationalist, far-right political ideology asserting the right of European ethnic groups and white peoples to Western culture and territories claimed to belong exclusively to them.

**Ultranationalism, and the “ultra-nation” can be understood as nationalism that takes on a quasi-religious, if not outright religious, character.


Preventing a fascist takeover

Here's what we can do to ensure the United States remains a democracy:

First: Be a proud antifascist.  The entire country was "antifa" during WWII when the threat was overseas.  How much more should we be anti-fascists when the threat is staring us in the face here at home?  

Second: Understand the extent of the threat.   Fascism cannot succeed if its appeal is limited to the fringe.  The violent Insurrection of January 6 was not limited to the fringe: 87% of those arrested for crimes in the Capitol Insurrection were not members of extremist groups. An estimated 21 million American adults agree both that the use of force to restore Donald Trump to the presidency is justified and that Joe Biden stole the 2020 election and is an illegitimate president. 

Third: Understand the racial reasons for the appeal of Trump's message:  "The No.1 belief that’s driving the difference between being in the 21 million versus being in the rest of the body politic is the right-wing conspiracy theory called the great replacement, which says that white people are being overtaken by minorities and that this is going to cause a loss of rights for white people. It used to be on the fringe, but...[now is] embraced in full-throated fashion by major political leaders and also by major media figures. If you live in an area that’s losing white population, you start to connect the dots to the [spin of] these narratives." 

Fourth: Demonstrate peacefully in opposition to the alt-right, white nationalists, and racists.  Dialog with the fearful citizens drawn into the camp of the great replacement conspiracy theory.  Support organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center and the American Friends Service Committee that oppose hate, racism and extremism.  

Fifth:  Work for voting rights and voter turnout.  Support organizations like Common Cause and the Brennan Center that work to ensure free and fair elections. 

Sixth: Pressure corporations to defund congressional election objectors.  Boycott advertisers on media that promote the great replacement conspiracy theory.  

Seventh: Act locally.  Watch what's happening with your school board. School boards across the country are being targeted by conservatives using the "CRT" dog-whistle.  Become a poll watcher.  Republicans are stacking election certification boards with people more likely to nullify the vote.  Provide comments on your state's redistricting plan.

World News Updates

POSTED JANUARY 27, 2023

HEADLINES FROM AROUND THE WORLD

Ethiopia

The fragile Ethiopian ceasefire negotiated in November to end a two-year civil war is holding.  Last week, large numbers of Eritrean troops left the town of Shire in Ethiopia's Tigray region where they fought in support of government forces during a two-year civil war.  The Eritrean forces' continuing presence in Tigray, despite a November ceasefire agreement between Ethiopia's government and Tigray regional forces that requires the withdrawal of foreign soldiers, is seen as a key obstacle to a lasting peace.  The Tigray war is believed to have resulted in tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of deaths and forced millions to flee their homes.

Previous related World News Update July 2022 ("Ethiopia")


Israel/Occupied Palestine

The Israeli military is continuing its deadly operations in the West Bank.  Israel and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad exchanged rockets on Friday following the Israel's single deadliest raid on the West Bank in two decades.  The Thursday raid on a refugee camp in the West Bank killed ten Palestinians, including an elderly woman.  The Palestinian death toll so far in 2023 is now at least 30.  A spokesman for the Palestinian health ministry said the situation on the ground was very difficult, with injured people continuously reaching hospitals, as it accused Israeli forces of obstructing ambulances and medics.  “There is an invasion that is unprecedented … in terms of how large it is and the number of injuries,” Wissam Baker, head of Jenin public hospital.  

Secretary of State Antony Blinken will travel to Egypt, Israel and the West Bank this weekend as the U.S. expressed alarm about escalating violence.  The trip, the second by a senior U.S. national security official this month, had already been expected to be fraught with tension over disagreements between President Joe Biden and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, particularly on the Palestinian conflict. 

Previous related Middle East Update September 2022 ("Biden's Middle East Trip")

Related post "Gaza blockade reaches 15 years" June 2022


Haiti

Angry demonstrators roared through the streets of Haiti’s capital, blocking roads and shooting guns into the air to protest a slew of killings of police officers by Haitian gangs over the last week.  Gang violence has been on the rise across Port-au-Prince in recent months, after the July 2021 assassination of President Jovenel Moise worsened widespread political instability and created a power vacuum.  

Prime Minister Ariel Henry, who took up the post just weeks after Moise’s 2021 killing and faces a crisis of legitimacy has appealed for an international armed force to be deployed to Haiti to restore order, but that set off new protests, with many Haitians, including civil society leaders, rejecting the prospect of foreign intervention.

Previous related World News Update: The Americas  August 2022 (Haiti)


Iran

Tehran was again the scene of anti-government rallies on Thursday night as Iran’s ruling clerics intensify their crackdown against opposition voices and ongoing nationwide protests.  Following a widespread power outage in Parand, southwest of Tehran, residents came to the streets and chanted slogans against the government. People in several nerigborhoods in Tehran itself, including Ponak, Bagh-e-Faiz, Tehran Pars and Bagheri town, also staged protests overnight.  At least 100 protesters are currently at risk of “execution, death penalty charges or sentences,” according to one rights group.  Around 20 people have been handed capital punishment sentences in connection with the protests. Four have been executed so far amid international outrage.

Previous related post: "What's going on in Iran?" October 2022

Nice speech, Joe...now, if you could change your abhorrent foreign policies, you may deserve a second term 

POSTED FEBRUARY 8, 2023

In what some have called the kickoff to his 2024 presidential campaign, President Biden delivered a State of the Union in which he focused on the economy, touting the economic achievements since he came into office and calling for a bipartisan effort to rebuild the middle class, to "finish the job".  Little mention was made of foreign policy and it was probably just as well.  President Biden's foreign policy continues to disappoint.  Instead of an imaginative diplomacy-oriented approach, Biden has continued the decades-old blunders of the foreign policy establishment and many of Trump's abhorrent policies, which now have become Joe's abhorrent policies.  

(1) Biden and NATO could have prevented Russia's invasion of Ukraine with diplomacy.  Instead they chose confrontation.  The war in Ukraine is is approaching the one-year mark and many observers consider it "unwinnable" by either side.  Believe it or not, here is one war that may have been prevented had Trump been president.  With Trump being more willing to negotiate with Putin on NATO's expansion into Russia's sphere of influence, the war may have been prevented.

Thinking about the tragedy unfolding in Ukraine (WITW, February 27): "The crisis stems directly from NATO's expansion into eastern Europe and could have been stopped by NATO's written guarantee that it would not expand to Ukraine, which shares a 1400 mile border with Russia.  The Biden Administration and NATO offered no such guarantee...The Russian government feels threatened by the NATO military alliance’s expansion to and significant military presence in  eastern Europe. This leads Russia to be hyper-aware of NATO's influence in Ukraine and other nations it views as within its sphere of influence."

(2) The Iran Nuclear Agreement is dead.  

Code Pink: "After reneging on the JCPOA, Trump slapped draconian sanctions on Iran, brought us to the brink of war by killing its top general...Biden must act decisively to restore mutual trust: immediately rejoin the JCPOA, lift the sanctions, and stop blocking the $5 billion IMF loan that Iran desperately needs to deal with the COVID crisis." 

What in the World? (Sep 10, 2021): "If the talks collapse, Biden and [Secretary of State] Blinken will only have themselves to blame.  In December, after Biden's victory but before the Iranian moderates' defeat, Iran's foreign minister Javad Zarif stated that Iran would come back into full compliance with its nuclear deal immediately after the incoming Biden administration in the US lifted all the illegal sanctions imposed by Donald Trump.  Biden could have done this on Day One of his administration.  He did not do so - apparently choosing to use the sanctions as bargaining chips instead."  

(3) Biden has made no effort to curtail the out of control military budget.  

(4) Biden has taken a business as usual approach to Israel as it imposes an apartheid regime on Palestinians, violates their human rights, kills them, and expands illegal settlements on stolen Palestinian land.  

(5) Biden has continued the traditional US policy of 'disdain' for Latin America, even keeping in place many of  Trump's policies.  

Cuba

Venezuela

Refugees and asylum seekers


World News Update: Protests

POSTED FEBRUARY 16, 2023

Protests do not always succeed.  Speaking truth to power is not easy.  Opposing an unjust war, demonstrating against the overthrow of an elected government, or protesting  the killing of an innocent person can be met with tone-deaf indifference or with brutal repression.   A look at a forgotten cause and some ongoing protests.

Myanmar

A coup d'état in Myanmar began on the morning of 1 February 2021, when democratically elected members of the country's ruling party, the National League for Democracy (NLD), were deposed by Myanmar's military—which then vested power in a military junta.   The junta declared the results of the November 2020 general election invalid and stated its intent to hold a new election at the end of the state of emergency. 

Protests began almost immediately.  Those protests were crushed.  Nearly 3,000 people have been killed, 1.5 million have been internally displaced, more than 13,000 are still detained in inhumane conditions, and four people are known to have been executed while at least 100 have been sentenced to death.  Unfortunately, the international community has all but forgotten this tragic conflict (CNN sidebar).  


The Myanmar military continues to arbitrarily arrest, torture and murder people with impunity two years after launching its coup.  Small peaceful protests are an almost-daily occurrence throughout the country now, but two points stand out: The amount of violence, especially in the countryside, has reached the level of civil war; and the grassroots movement opposing military rule has defied expectations by largely holding off the ruling generals.  


One group that has not forgotten is Amnesty International.  Amnesty International issued a statement on January 30, which called for 

Russia

As the Russian invasion of Ukraine approaches the one-year mark:

Peru

In December, Peru's elected left-wing president Pedro Castillo was removed from office, impeached by the Peruvian Congress, and arrested.  Vice President Dina Boluarte was installed in his place.  Demonstrations spread across Peru in protest.  The violent government response has resulted in a death toll between 50 and 60.

Protesters are demanding that national elections be moved up from 2026 to this year, but Congress has voted against doing so four times.  Human rights activists and protesters allege the government has used excessive force to stem protests.  [sidebar] The demonstrations have widespread support among the Peruvian people.  Polls show around 76% of people in Peru disapprove of Boluarte, 89% disapprove of Congress, 60% say the protests are justified, and three out of four people said that elections should be held this year. 

A group of 20 Democratic lawmakers is urging the Biden administration to temporarily suspend security aid to Peru over a “pattern of repression” against antigovernment protesters that have taken to the streets since December after the impeachment and arrest of former President Pedro Castillo. 

Iran

The United Nations on Tuesday named three women to lead a rights investigation into Iran’s violent crackdown on women-led protests that have rocked the Islamic republic for more than four months.  The investigators will document the Iranian authorities’ repression of the protests and potential human rights violations with a view to possible legal action against officials in Iran or elsewhere.  Iran is not expected to cooperate with the investigation.

Last year, the death of a 22-year-old woman, Mahsa Amini, in the custody of Iran's so-called "morality police" [sidebar] sparked protests across the country. Human rights groups estimate that nearly 20,000 people have been jailed since demonstrations broke out.  More than 500 protesters have been killed, and and according to the group Human Rights Activists in Iran, Iran has executed four of those detained in hastened trials.

Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei last week reportedly ordered an amnesty or reduced sentences for "tens of thousands" of people amid antigovernment protests that have continued since September.  Critics point out that the majority of the Iranians who are given amnesty are not the people that were participating in the protests.  Iranian state media reported the amnesty didn't apply to those facing charges related to espionage, links to foreign intelligence services or attacks on government or public sites — what many of the protesters have been charged with.

Four months into Iran’s uprising, protesters are still in the streets. Authorities are still answering with violence and intimidation.  Nowhere is this bloody stalemate more evident than in the southeastern province of Sistan-Baluchestan, which endured the single deadliest government crackdown on protesters in late September and is now the site of weekly demonstrations after Friday prayers.  The Washington Post report on the intensity and sophistication of the government crackdown, and the persistence of the protesters is in the sidebar.

POSTSCRIPT: It's easy to point at our adversaries for their crackdown on protesters or their non-cooperation with the UN Human Rights Council.  But the United States is not blameless. In the recent past, we withdrew from the UNHRC when the UNHRC condemned the Israeli massacre of Palestinian demonstrators in 2018.  Nikki Haley, who just announced her bid to become the 2024 Republican presidential candidate, was our UN Ambassador at the time.  Deeper in the past, as protests against the Vietnam War mounted, we witnessed the police riot in Chicago at the 1968 Democratic Convention and the killing of four Kent State students by members of the Ohio National Guard in 1970.

Today, as Republicans attack education and try to erase history, it's good to remember resistance movements that were successful in moving our country forward, if only a little bit.  These lesser-known protest movements have lessons for us today. [sidebar]

The war in Ukraine at the one-year mark

POSTED FEBRAURY 23, 2023

Friday is the one-year anniversary of Russia's brutal and indefensible invasion of Ukraine.  This is a war that didn't have to be.

As the Russian troop buildup progressed in early 2022, President Biden was promising severe economic consequences against Russia should they invade.  For its part, Russia was indicating that it would not  invade if NATO gave a written guarantee that it would not expand into Ukraine, which shares a 1400 mile border with Russia.  NATO did not provide the requested written guarantee, and Biden's threat of economic consequences did not stop the invasion.

Three days after the invasion of February 24, 2022, a WITW post* gave some thoughts on the tragedy unfolding in Ukraine:

One year later, all this still holds true.  

A war that could have been avoided continues, and the massive arms shipments to Ukraine have done nothing to end the conflict.  Rather, by encouraging Ukraine to fight rather than negotiate, they have just prolonged it.  

Although you would not know it from the media coverage, neither side is likely to win a military victory.  Here in the Western press, an erroneous triumphalist narrative prevails: Ukraine is defeating Russia and will keep scoring victories as long as the West keeps sending it more money and increasingly powerful and deadly weapons.  In reality, as Code Pink notes, "the need to keep recreating the illusion that Ukraine is winning by hyping limited gains on the battlefield has forced Ukraine to keep sacrificing its forces in extremely bloody battles, like its counter-offensive around Kherson and the Russian sieges of Bakhmut and Soledar."  [link below]


*The post also provided background on the centuries old Russia-Ukraine relationship, on NATO's expansion into Eastern Europe, and on the Western-supported coup of 2014 that drove the elected pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovich from office.  

Despite neither Ukraine nor Russia showing signs of wanting to negotiate, the Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley told the Financial Times last week. that it is likely the war will end at the negotiating table.  

The need for a negotiated end to the war is clear.  World leaders from Pope Francis to Chinese President Xi Jinping have offered to help achieve that.  So far there have been no takers. Jeffrey Sachs, who has been urging negotiations since the early days of the war, provides some insight into what a negotiated settlement might look like. [link below]

The losses on both sides of this war have been staggering.  While the combatants may not be willing to negotiate a final peace yet, they might agree to a cease-fire.  The cease-fire could then be followed by an armistice like the one that ended fighting in the Korean War - a viable alternative to stalemate and attrition in Ukraine. [link below]

As the West escalates the lethality and number of weapons sent to Ukraine, demonstrations for a negotiated settlement and in opposition to the continued supply of the arms that are prolonging the conflict have erupted across Europe including  Germany, Poland, France, Italy, and Great Britain.  Meanwhile, in the United States, a new Right-Left coalition has emerged to oppose US policy.

In Russia, thousands of antiwar activists have been arrested or have gone into exile, and the resistance continues today in the form of anti-war "flower protests", which have spread to 60 cities across Russia.  In Belarus, which has been Russia's biggest supporter and which does not recognize the right to refuse to kill, War Resisters International is raising the alarm about the conscientious objectors who are being forced into exile or jailed.

I close this post with a link [below] to Peace in Ukraine, an organization dedicated to building "a massive, unified response with peace-loving people around the world to say No to War in Ukraine; Yes to Negotiations and Peace." 

May their efforts and those of other war resisters and peacemakers meet with success and may this tragic war come to an end.

World News Updates

POSTED MARCH 30, 2023

Mexico [1, 2]

A fire killed at least 38 men held at a Mexican immigration detention center just across the U.S. border from El Paso, Texas.  The fire broke out when migrants fearing deportation set mattresses ablaze late Monday, March 27.  Surveillance video shows guards walking away from the cells with no attempt made to unlock the doors.  The deaths in Mexico came just hours after the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees urged the Biden administration not to adopt the proposed anti-asylum rule that would deny claims made by refugees who lack, quote, “documents sufficient for lawful admission.”

The Continuing Sad State of US Immigration Policy - Mar 10 

Haiti [8]

An American couple who visited Haiti earlier this month was kidnapped and is being held for ransom, a common occurrence in the country, where more than 100 kidnappings and 530 killings were reported in the first two weeks of March.  The violence in Haiti has risen to record levels since the assassination of Haitian President Jovenel Moise in July 2021, and the country is now overcome with gang violence and is one of the poorest nations in the Western Hemisphere.  Jean Eddy Saint Paul, a native of Haiti and director of the CUNY Haitian Studies Institute makes the connection between the violence there and lax US gun laws: “The kidnappings that are happening in Haiti are directly tied to weak U.S policy to regulate guns that are coming from the U.S and going into the Caribbean. Most of the guns that are killing people in Haiti came directly from the United States of America.”  WLRN Miami's 2022 manalysis is linked below.

Israel [3, 4, 5]

In January, two weeks after the most far-right government in Israel's history was sworn in, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced plans to overhaul the country’s Supreme Court and allow politicians a greater say in its appointments and decisions. Under the plans, the Knesset, Israel’s parliament, would be able to pass laws even if the court had declared them illegal. They would also give Netanyahu and his allies the final say in appointing the country’s judges.  Mass protests against this authoritarian power grab began almost immediately.  Protests rose to unprecedented levels in recent weeks with hundreds of thousands of Israelis taking to the streets, and on Tuesday, Netanyahu agreed to delay his push to overhaul and weaken Israel’s judiciary until the next parliamentary session.

The "democracy" protests demonstrate two things.  First, Israelis can pressure their government to stop its proposed actions when they want to.  Secondly, these protests underscore just how deep the consensus is within Israel about the apartheid system and discrimination against Palestinians.  Specifically, if hundreds of thousands can take to the streets and force change when they believe their rights are threatened, why have they not done it for the oppressed and occupied Palestinians.  One final point: as the post at The Intercept linked below notes: the perception of an independent judiciary is crucial to Israel's ability to escape accountability for its war crimes against Palestinians.

France [6, 7]

Protests continue in France over the Macron government's raising of the retirement age from 62 to 64.  Unions have shut down airports, train stations, schools, garbage collection, oil refineries and more. The strikes came as the head of France’s largest labor union, Laurent Berger, called on Macron to put the deeply unpopular pension reform on hold. Millions of people have been demonstrating and joining strike action in France since mid-January to show their opposition to the bill.  Unions said the next nationwide day of protests would be on April 6.  The protests have intensified since the Macron government used special powers to push the bill through parliament without a vote.

Sources: [1] Democracy Now! [2] USA Today [3] NBC News [4] Democracy Now! [5] The Intercept   [6] Reuters [7] Democracy Now!  [8] Yahoo News

Junta airstrike against civilians in Myanmar draws global condemnation

POSTED APRIL 13, 2023

A deadly airstrike by Myanmar’s military on a civilian crowd has sparked global condemnation, as witnesses recounted the horror of the attack that could be the junta’s deadliest since a coup two years ago [link below].  The initial death toll stood at 53 from Tuesday’s attacks on a village ceremony in Sagaing region at which women and children were present, but later tallies reported by independent media raised it to about 100.  Myanmar’s air force dropped multiple bombs while attack helicopters strafed the civilian gathering of several hundred people, said Duwa Lashi La, acting president of the National Unity Government (NUG), which was set up to oppose junta rule.

The air attack drew global condemnation from, among others, the US, the EU, the UN, and ASEAN.  The chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) said the bloc "strongly condemns" the military airstrike.  "All forms of violence must end immediately, particularly the use of force against civilians.  This would be the only way to create a conducive environment for an inclusive national dialogue to find a sustainable peaceful solution in Myanmar."

The Sagaing region, where the attack occurred has put up some of the fiercest resistance to the military’s rule, with intense fighting raging there for months.  In the time-honored tradition of oppressors everywhere, Myanmar's military said it carried out a deadly attack on a village gathering organized by its insurgent opponents this week, and if civilians were also killed it was because they were being forced to help "terrorists".

What can be done to bring the fighting to an end in Myanmar?

First on the list is to stop the supply of aviation fuel to Myanmar so that atrocities like this are not repeated.  Montse Ferrer, an Amnesty International business and human rights researcher, said there was an urgent need to suspend the supply of aviation fuel to Myanmar’s military. “This supply chain fuels violations of international humanitarian law, including war crimes, and it must be disrupted in order to save lives,” Ferrer said. 

Next is to get ASEAN to do its job.  Aviation fuel flows through many of the countries.  Besides interrupting the supply chain to Myanmar, they must invest more effort in bringing the two sides together for talks.  As Burmese scholar, dissident, human rights activist Maung Zarni,  states in a Democracy Now! interview: "ASEAN has been a complete failure in the case of Cambodian genocide, Rohingya genocide 40 years later, and it is failing when its member state is using air force to terrorize the civilian population...ASEAN’s regional bloc [has exhibited a] complete and utter failure to lift a finger to stop the killings."

Finally, there is China.  As the superpower in the region, China has had an on-again, off-again relationship with the junta.  It is time for them to step up and serve as a catalyst to bring the parties together.  How it can do so  - in light of the smaller nations fear of China's dominance - is a big, but not insurmountable, hurdle to be overcome.  

Closing note: It is a shame that the United States and China are positioning themselves for another Cold War.  The United Sates as a nominal backer of the Myanmar democracy movement and China as the region's superpower could have worked together to stop the bloodshed.

World News Update

POSTED MAY 12, 2023

Ukraine [1, 2, 3]

The war of attrition in Ukraine continues into its 15th month.  This totally avoidable war has cost the lives of as many as 50,000 Russian and Ukrainian soldiers with another 300,000 wounded.   Purported US intelligence documents posted online predict that the conflict may continue well beyond 2023.  According to the United Nations, as of May 7,  8,791 civilians have been killed and another 14,815 have been injured in Ukraine since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022.  These figures may be low since reporting from some zones of intense fighting is delayed.

As the bloodshed continues, international actors are calling for negotiations, possibly brokered by China or Brazil, to end the war.  Phyllis Bennis, author and a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies, is among the voices of sanity in the West calling for a ceasefire instead of continuing escalation.  In an extended interview with Democracy Now! [link in sidebar below], Bennis notes the first step has to be a coming together of a number of nations to call for a ceasefire. "A ceasefire is the immediate demand.  It won’t lead to justice by itself, but if the end of the shooting can happen, if the end of the bombing can happen, if people are no longer being killed, there is a much better chance that serious negotiations could get underway."  For Bennis a key issue is whether Ukraine's backers in the West are willing to let Ukraine negotiate. "I think that there is a good chance that the Ukrainian leadership would accept almost any serious negotiations at this point. One of the issues is: Will their key military backers, particularly the United States, pull back from their earlier positions of telling the Ukrainians, essentially, 'We don’t want a ceasefire yet. We’re not pushing you to negotiate'?"

Sudan [4, 5, 6, 7]

Hundreds have been killed and 700,000 displaced in Sudan's civil war, which is entering its 5th week.  The fighting has pushed Sudan toward the brink of collapse and undermined, perhaps permanently, a Western-funded project to bring democracy to a country beset by autocracy and conflict for half a century.   Fighting between forces loyal to two top generals has put that nation at risk of collapse and could have consequences far beyond its borders.  Both sides have tens of thousands of fighters, foreign backers, mineral riches and other resources that could insulate them from sanctions. It’s a recipe for the kind of prolonged conflict that has devastated other countries in the Middle East and Africa, from Lebanon and Syria to Libya and Ethiopia.  As its negotiators participate in Sudan ceasefire talks in Saudi Arabia, the United States is “cautiously optimistic” about securing a truce to deliver humanitarian aid to the country.

The US Institute of Peace explains what's behind the fighting in Sudan in the link in the sidebar.

Israel/Occupied Palestine [8]

Thursday was the one-year anniversary of the killing of Palestinian-American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh by Israeli forces during their raid on a refugee camp in Occupied Palestine.  Although multiple independent investigations by media outlets and eyewitnesses concluded that the slain reporter was not in the immediate vicinity of any fighting and clearly identified as "Press", the US administration has adopted the Israeli claim that Abu Akleh was shot “accidentally”. 

On the anniversary of her death, human rights advocates renewed the call for an independent and thorough investigation.

Others pointed to the hollowness of the Administration's claims of support for journalistic freedom...

...and to the decades long US silence of rights violations against Palestinians

From the ethnic cleansing of 75 years ago, the Nakba, to the current day, the month of May has been a particularly bad time for Palestinians.   And the world sits back and watches as their human rights are trampled and they are denied a nation. No nation has been more complicit in this or more of an enabler than the United States whose championing of human rights and international law do not apparently extend to the Palestinian people.

On May 14, 2018, the Israeli military fired on unarmed demonstrators during the March of Return protests, killing 55 and wounding 2700.  When the United Nations General Assembly voted 120 to 8 to condemn the massacre, the United States withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council.  

Anthony Bourdain talks about the response to his Parts Unknown "West Bank and Gaza" episode in the sidebar..."The world has visited many terrible things on the Palestinian people, none more shameful than robbing them of their basic humanity." - Anthony Bourdain

Sources: [1] Al Jazeera -1, [2] Radio Free Europe, [3] Democracy Now!, [4] Al Jazeera -2, [5]  Foreign Policy, [6] Associated Press [7] Al Jazeera - 3, [8] Al Jazeera - 4

World News Updates

POSTED AUGUST 24, 2023

Niger [1, 2, 3, 4]

In late July, Niger's democratically elected President Mohamed Bazoum was overthrown by his own presidential guards.  Niger thus became the sixth country in Africa’s sprawling and impoverished Sahel region, which spans the continent from the Atlantic Ocean to the Red Sea, to have experienced a coup since 2020. African officers trained by the U.S. military have now taken part in 11 coups in West Africa since 2008, including in Burkina Faso and Mali.  

ECOWAS (Economic Community of West African States) has imposed sanctions and is threatening military action if Bazoum is not returned to power.  Niger’s coup leader, Abdourahmane Tchiani, proposed a three-year transition of power after meeting a delegation of West African leaders.  ECOWAS has rejected the transition plan.  Meanwhile the crisis and the sanctions have made the situation of Niger's people even more precarious.  "The current situation is of great concern and adds a heavy burden to an already dire humanitarian landscape," UNICEF's Niger representative, Stefano Savi, said in a statement. "At present, more than two million children have been impacted by the crisis and are in desperate need of humanitarian assistance."  Even before the latest instability, around 1.5 million children under the age of five were forecast to be malnourished in 2023, he said in the statement dated Saturday.

Sudan [5, 6, 7]

Fighting erupted in Sudan between the Sudanese Army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces on April 15. Since that outbreak of violence, the situation continues to “spiral out of control,” according to a report from the United Nations released last week.  The United Nations is warning that millions are on the verge of famine in Sudan due to the war, the World Health Organization said it is becoming increasingly difficult to control ongoing outbreaks of measles, malaria and dengue, and UNICEF says that 14 million children are in dire need of humanitarian relief.  

Pointing to a possible peaceful resolution of the conflict, Sudan’s Sovereign Council deputy chairman Malik Agar said the situation “necessitates us to form a government to run the wheel of the state." He outlined his idea for a path to a truce, which he said “starts with reaching a ceasefire agreement between the Sudanese army and Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF),” adding that dialogue between political parties could establish a transitional period and trigger elections.  “The war will eventually stop at the negotiating table,” he said.

Guatemala [8]

In Guatemala, progressive presidential candidate Bernardo Arévalo has won a landslide victory in a runoff election against former first lady Sandra Torres. Arévalo, a member of the Semilla party, took nearly 60% of the vote Sunday after months of political persecution.  Bernardo Arévalo is the son of former President Juan José Arévalo, Guatemala’s first democratically elected leader, who pushed for revolutionary policies when he was in office from 1945 to 1951. Three years later, in 1954, the CIA backed a coup, putting an end to democracy in Guatemala.  Bernardo Arévalo’s victory comes after a tumultuous year in Guatemala, as the country’s ruling business and political elite took extraordinary measures to maintain its grip on power, barring several candidates from running in the primary.  Soon after Arévalo won a spot in the runoff, the attorney general’s office suspended his Semilla party, and police raided their offices. While Arévalo was allowed to keep running for president, he may still be blocked from becoming president.  As explained in the Democracy Now! interview [link below], Arévalo supporters are anticipating a two-stage attack  on the election  results.  Step one is to dissolve Arévalo’s party, saying that it had false signatures in qualifying for the election.  Without legislators, it would be impossible for Arévalo and vice-president Karin Herrera to govern.  Step two is to level trumped-up criminal charges against Arévalo and Herrera.  In the end, the people of Guatemala may have to take to the streets to prevent a return to the days of US-supported military dictators that ruled Guatemala from the time of the CIA-backed coup in 1954 into the 1980's.

Ukraine [9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]

It's been 18 months since Russia invaded Ukraine in a war that could have been avoided.  Prior to its invasion, Russia requested that NATO guarantee in writing that it would not expand into Ukraine, a country with which Russia shares a 1400 mile border.  Led by the United States and Great Britain, NATO refused.  Russia responded with its invasion of Ukraine.  The West responded with escalating arms shipments to Ukraine, including recently cluster bombers, which are banned in more than 100 countries because of their indiscriminate effects on civilian populations.

In the interim, there have been nearly a half million casualties among Ukrainian and Russian soldiers, 14 million Ukrainians have been forced to leave their homes, more than 9000 civilians have been killed,  the US has sent nearly $50 billion in military aid to Ukraine, the global grain supply chain has been disrupted, and the Doomsday Clock is now at 90 seconds- the closest it has ever been.

Three days after the invasion, I posted Thinking About the Tragedy Unfolding in Ukraine.  In (very) brief:

Those are still my thoughts, and they are as applicable now as they were then.  (The post has additional background on the history of Ukraine-Russia relations and how the world got to the point of war.)

In spite of Western media triumphalism, in spite of the tens of billions of dollars of weaponry sent to Ukraine, and in spite of the heralded Ukrainian offensive, there will be no military solution to the conflict - for either side.  The war will drag on until there are negotiations to end it.  As to what a negotiated settlement might look like, the Washington Post article from March 2022 [link below left] outlines the key negotiating points:

1. Neutrality: For Russia, an insistence on Ukraine’s neutrality is probably the most important demand.  Such neutrality would, of course, preclude Ukraine's membership in the NATO military alliance.

2. Western security guarantees: For Ukraine, any pledge of neutrality while it’s still holding its own on the battlefield would likely need to come with a pledge, acknowledged by Russia, that Western powers would come to its aid if Kyiv were threatened again.

3. Crimea, Luhansk and Donetsk: As a settlement condition, Russia may demand recognition by Kyiv and the international community of its annexation of Crimea, as well as de facto Russian control over Donbas — things the Ukrainians have pledged they would never do.

The Post article, written a month after the invasion,  is optimistic as to the chance for negotiations to end the war.  The optimism was well-founded. Numerous Western media outlets reported Ukraine and Russia had made significant progress on "a tentative 15-point peace plan including a ceasefire and Russian withdrawal if Kyiv declares neutrality and accepts limits on its armed forces."

Well, what happened?  As with their initial refusal to negotiate a halt to NATO expansion before the war started, the UK and US, to their enduring shame, both played a role in killing the chance for a peace settlement in the early months of the war. [links below center and right]  Eighteen months later, the war continues.


Sources: [1] Al Jazeera [2] AFP [3] Democracy Now!  [4] Reuters [5] Deseret News [6] CNN [7] NPR [8] Democracy Now! [9] NYTimes [10] Wikipedia [11] Statista [12] Council on Foreign Relations [13] Washington Post [14] The Irish Times

"Why are we in Ukraine?"

POSTED NOVEMBER 1, 2023

Harper's Magazine is one of the few US mainstream media sources that gets it right on Ukraine.  Rather than the usual bluster about "making Russia pay a price" and our need to sink tens of billions of dollars in a war that could have been prevented with diplomacy, their writers offer a less belligerent approach.  In an article from the June issue, "Why Are We in Ukraine?", foreign policy experts Benjamin Schwartz and Christopher Layne provide background on what led to the war and offer a vision of how a Ukraine peace settlement attained through compromise and negotiation might effect Europe. 

In this first post we will take a look at what the authors say led to war, a proxy war between the United States and Russia that has brought us closer to the brink of a nuclear confrontation than anything since the Cuban missile crisis.

What led to the War in Ukraine - a war that could have been prevented

“As the Soviets quit Eastern and Central Europe at the end of the cold war, they imagined that NATO would be dissolved alongside the Warsaw Pact. This was recognized by the French and the Germans and President Mitterrand of France and Germany's Foreign Minister Genscher “aimed to build a new European security system that would transcend the US- and Soviet-led alliances that had defined a divided continent. Washington would have none of it."

Rather than dissolving, NATO, driven by the United States,  expanded into central and eastern Europe beginning in the 1990s.  In spite of assurances given to Moscow at the time of the dissolution of the Soviet Union “that NATO would advance 'not one inch' east of a unified Germany", NATO embarked on a series of expansions that took them to the very doorstep of Russia by the 2010s.  The expansion took place against the advice of foreign policy experts and diplomats and against the expressed security concerns of Russia. [map and timeline below]

"Russia repeatedly and unambiguously characterized NATO expansion as a perilous and provocative encirclement...American officials shrugged off those protests."  

As concerned as Russia was about NATO's expansion into central and eastern Europe, Ukraine represented "the brightest of red lines" - these words spoken fifteen years ago by William J. Burns, then the US Ambassador to Russia and now Biden's CIA director.  The long history of Ukraine and Russia, their 1400 mile shared border, and the strategic importance of the Black Sea to Russia's navy made NATO expansion to Ukraine a provocative and menacing threat to the Russians.  

"Two critical precipitated Russia's war in Ukraine.  First, at NATO's Bucharest summit in April 2008, the US delegation, led by President Bush, urged the alliance to put Ukraine and Georgia on the immediate path to NATO membership.

"The second precipitating event came when Ukraine began talks about forming an 'association agreement' [with the European Union] in September 2008...The association agreement...eventually called for the gradual convergence on foreign and security matters...[This] would have precluded Ukraine from Moscow's planned Eurasian Economic Union - a high priority for the Kremlin"

And it was economic issues that led to the Maidan protests and the overthrow of Ukraine's democratically elected pro-Moscow President Viktor Yanukovych in 2014. Although much about the protests and overthrow of President Yanukovych remains unclear, the authors note that "circumstantial evidence points to the United States semi-covertly promoting regime change by destabilizing Yanukovych."  Having already seen the United States and NATO involved in wars to effect regime change in Panama (1989), Yugoslavia (1999), Iraq (2003), and Libya (2011), alarm bells rang out loudly amongst the Russian ruling class.

Still all was not lost.  Russia continued to express its strong concerns about NATO expansion to Ukraine and the threat it perceived it to be.  As the Russian troop buildup proceeded in late 2021 and early 2022, they reiterated that they would not invade Ukraine if NATO pledged not to expand there.  


"Far from expressing any ambition to conquer, occupy, and annex Ukraine (an impossible goal for the 190,00 troops Russia eventually deployed in its initial attack on the county), all of Russia's demarches and demands during the run-up to the invasion made clear that 'the key to everything is that NATO will not expand eastward' as Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov put it in a press conference on January 14, 2022."


Six weeks before the invasion, consistent with more than 30 years of Russia's insistence that Ukraine not become part of NATO, the West, in general, and President Biden, in particular, could have prevented the war by agreeing to guarantee in writing that Ukraine would not join NATO.  We did not do so, and Russia began its brutal and illegal assault against Ukraine.



The war is now in its 21st month.  Calls for a ceasefire go unheeded as more and more weaponry is poured into Ukraine, and a negotiated settlement does not appear likely in the near future.  But this war will not be settled on the battlefield.  Neither side will be able to attain its stated objectives.  Until both come to their senses, the carnage, which has already caused more than 500,000 Ukrainian and Russian soldier casualties, will continue.


In a future post, we will take a look at what compromises a negotiated settlement might entail and what a post-Ukraine-war Europe might look like.

Sources: "Why are we in Ukraine" by Benjamin Schwarz and Christopher Layne, Harper's Magazine, June 2023

1988 to 1991 - The collapse of the Soviet Union ends the Cold War. Soviet Union divides into 15 republics, one of which is Ukraine.  In return for Russia's acceptance of German reunification, NATO would not expand into Eastern Europe. 

1999 - Three former Warsaw Pact countries - Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic - join NATO, amid much debate within the organization and Russian opposition. 

2002 to 2004 - NATO expands to seven more Central and Eastern European countries: Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia.

2009 - Albania and Croatia join NATO

2017 - Montenegro joins NATO

2020 - North Macedonia joins NATO

2021 -  NATO officially recognizes three aspiring members: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, and Ukraine 

War crimes and war criminals

POSTED NOVEMBER 13, 2023 (UPDATED NOV 16)

President Joe Biden has repeatedly labeled Russian President Vladimir Putin a war criminal, while at the same time giving his full support to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is currently overseeing what a former top UN official calls a text-book case of genocide against the population of Gaza.  Who's the bigger war criminal?

Hands down, the winner of the War Criminal of the Year title is Netanyahu.  Palestinian groups and others are calling for Netanyahu's arrest by the International Criminal Court.  [links in sidebar] And, as Israel rejects growing international calls for a ceasefire in Gaza, the Center for Constitutional Rights in the United States is suing President Biden for failing to prevent genocide

November 16 Update: After the attacks on Gaza's largest hospital, Israeli military spokesperson claimed that they have found evidence of Hamas operations there.  In the Al Jazeera Live Story of November 16  [link in sidebar], critics* point out that there was no evidence of the hospital being used as a Hamas military command center, that the disproportionate response and the indiscriminate bombardment of the Palestinian hospital system are war crimes, and that the incubators brought in by Israeli soldiers amounted to bringing a bandage to a patient whose heart had been ripped out.  

November 17 Update: Israel knows it risks losing international support for its ongoing slaughter of children.  As a result, Israel’s propaganda and disinformation machine is finding new ways to justify the killing of children and the bombing of medical facilities. Their social media disinformation campaign (which includes a fake nurse blaming Hamas for problems at al-Shifa, Mein-Kampf-reading children and a bunker under a children's hospital) is shredded in a post titled Fact or Fiction: Israel needs fake nurses to justify killing Gaza babies.

*Interviewed for the story were Erik Fosse – CEO of the Norwegian Aid Committee; has worked as a surgeon in Gaza during several wars since 1994; A Kayum Ahmed – special adviser on the right to health at Human Rights Watch; Thomas MacManus – Director of the International State Crime Initiative, Queen Mary University of London

Getting to a negotiated settlement in the war in Ukraine

POSTED NOVEMBER 29, 2023

The stalemated war in Ukraine has entered its 22nd month. The formula endlessly invoked by Washington policy makers and politicians “Whatever it takes, for as long as it takes” pretty much ensures that this stalemate will continue for the foreseeable future. As foreign policy experts Benjamin Schwartz and Christopher Layne explain, “Neither Moscow nor Kyiv appears capable of attaining its stated war aims in full...Barring either side's complete collapse, the war can end only with compromise.” Given the rhetoric in Washington and given Russian concerns about America's pursuit of nuclear primacy and NATO's expansion strategy, reaching such an accord will be extremely difficult. [1]

Nevertheless, we must try.  

There were chances to prevent the war from ever happening...

Even as Russia began its troop buildup along the Ukraine border, the war might still have been avoided had NATO guaranteed in writing they would not expand into Ukraine.  Led by the United States, NATO refused.

And there were chances to end the war in its early  months...

In talks that took place during the first month after the Russian invasion, Russia and Ukraine tentatively agreed to a fifteen-point peace plan in talks mediated by Turkey. Details still had to be worked out, but the framework and the political will were there.  What happened to this early chance at a negotiated settlement? As Ukrainian and Turkish sources have since revealed, the U.K. and U.S. governments played decisive roles in torpedoing those early prospects for peace. [sidebar]* 

What were the key elements of this lost chance at peace just a month or two into the war? 

(1) Russia would withdraw from all of Ukraine, except for Crimea and the self-declared republics in the Donbas region.

(2)Ukraine would renounce future membership in NATO and adopt a position of neutrality between Russia and NATO.

(3) The agreed framework provided for political transitions in Crimea and Donbas that both sides would accept and recognize, based on self-determination for the people of those regions.

(4) The future security of Ukraine was to be guaranteed by a group of other countries, but Ukraine would not host foreign military bases on its territory.

These could serve as guides to what a negotiated settlement might look like if we can overcome the hurdles and mindsets now blocking peace.  As Schwartz and Layne point out, the best chance for a negotiated peace settlement is generally during the first months of a war. Each month that a war rages on offers reduced chances for peace; as each side highlights the atrocities of the other, hostility becomes entrenched and positions harden. 

How do we get to a point where negotiations might take place?  Peace activists like Medea Benjamin have been advocating negotiations since the beginning of the war.  While international actors are calling for negotiations, possibly brokered by China or Brazil, to end the war, Benjamin's optimism about a peace movement gaining enough support to achieve peace has been sadly unfulfilled.  [link in sidebar from October 2022 interview on Democracy Now!]   

Phyllis Bennis, author and a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies,  believes that the inability to build a unified effort to end this war stems from tensions within the peace movement between "those who support one set of legitimate rights of Ukraine as the most important aspects and others who support other rights of Ukraine and the world as the more important."  Bennis argues that the essential first step to negotiations is a ceasefire: 

"A ceasefire is only step one. A ceasefire is only the prelude to negotiations, which should lead to Russian troops being pulled out...In almost every situation, serious negotiations don’t take place until there’s a ceasefire. We’re not talking about Russia being allowed somehow to keep territory it has claimed. That’s a clear violation of international law in a whole host of ways. But it’s a step. It’s a necessary step. We can’t leave out that it’s only step one, that the next step has to be moving towards serious negotiations.

"There also need to be separate negotiations, in which — the United States, first of all, has no right to tell the Ukrainians what they should do in the negotiations. But as its main supplier of arms, of money, of all kinds of support, it has, in my view, not only the right, but the obligation, to push Ukraine towards negotiations, as at the same time that the world is pushing the Russians towards negotiations."

Schwartz and Layne sketch an outline for what "a comprehensive European settlement in the aftermath of the Ukraine war" would entail.  

"That settlement...would need to resemble the vision, thwarted by Washington, that Genscher  [Germany's Vice Chancellor and Minister for Foreign Affairs, Mitterrand [President of France], and Gorbachev [President of the Soviet Union] sought to ratify at the end of the Cold War.  It would need to resemble Gorbachev's notion of a 'common European home' and Charles de Gaulle's vision of Europen community from the Atlantic to the Urals.'  And it would have to recognize NATO for what it is (and for what Charles de Gaulle labeled it): an instrument to further the primacy of a superpower across the Atlantic...A new European security structure must therefore replace NATO."

Of course, this would require the United States to accept a diminished role in world affairs - i.e., accept that we need not be "the world's indispensable nation" - and to abandon the false lessons of the Cuban missile crisis - where negotiations, not JFK's tough stance towards the Soviet Union, ended the crisis.  

Can we do that?  After Vietnam, after myriad interventions in the affairs of our neighbors in the Western Hemisphere, after endless wars in the Middle East, can the United States adopt a more restrained self-image that would allow the "United States at long last to pursue a more tolerant relationship with a recalcitrant world"?  Can we for once and for all, give peace a chance?

References and sources: [1] Benjamin Schwartz and Christopher Layne, “Why are we in Ukraine?”, Harper's Magazine, June 2023, [2] The Lost Promise of Peace in Ukraine - Progressive.org, Medea Benjamin & Nicolas Davies: Negotiations “Still the Only Way Forward” to End Ukraine War | Democracy Now!Phyllis Bennis on Ukraine War & Why a Ceasefire Is the First Step Toward Lasting Peace | Democracy Now!


Note: *UK Prime Minster Boris Johnson visited Kyiv on April 9 and reportedly told President Zelenskyy that the U.K. was “in it for the long run,” that it would not be party to any agreement between Russia and Ukraine, and that the “collective West” saw a chance to “press” Russia and was determined to make the most of it. U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin reiterated essentially the same message during his visit on April 25. [2]

The best of humanity, 2023

POSTED DECEMBER 7, 2023

A small selection of this year's peace, social justice, and humanitarian award winners.

Nobel Peace Prize

The 2023 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Narges Mohammadi “for her fight against the oppression of women in Iran and her fight for human rights and freedom for all.” She has paid a high price for her courageous struggle. She has been arrested many times and sentenced to a total of 31 years in prison and 154 lashes. At the same time, the struggle that Narges Mohammadi and many others in the country are waging is not only about women’s rights, but about freedom for the entire population of Iran. At the time of the announcement of the 2023 peace prize, Narges Mohammadi was still in prison. You can find a Nobel Committee video describing her work here.

2023 peace laureate Narges Mohammadi asked that her daughter Kiana deliver a message that she has managed to smuggle out of prison in Tehran, Iran. [video below]

UNHCR Nansen Refugee Award’s 2023 Global Laureate

The Nansen Award is a prestigious award given by the UNHCR to individuals, groups or organizations who help refugees, stateless or displaced people. The award is named after Fridtjof Nansen, the first High Commissioner for Refugees and a Nobel Peace Prize laureate.  As a result of his efforts to advocate for the right of displaced children to receive an education, Abdullahi Mire, a Somali refugee, has been selected as the Global Laureate of the UNHCR Nansen Refugee Award for the year 2023.  Mire, who spent his childhood in the Dadaab refugee camps in Kenya, has distributed more than one hundred thousand books to children and young people who have been uprooted from their homes in the country.

Centri Tech Foundation’s Social Justice Innovation Awards

The Centri Tech Foundation’s Social Justice Innovation Awards, a partnership with Morgan Stanley, recognize innovative approaches to systemic change in the United States that seek to advance social and racial justice and build an inclusive economy. This year’s winners are:

Reginald Dwayne Betts, a poet and lawyer, founded Freedom Reads to bring the transformative power of literature to incarcerated individuals and usher in a more compassionate and rehabilitative approach to justice.

Trooper Sanders is the CEO of Benefits Data Trust, a data and technology-powered nonprofit that connects eligible families and individuals to $80 billion in untapped government assistance.

Dr. Nashlie H. Sephus is the driving force behind The Bean Path, a $25 million tech innovation hub in Jackson, Mississippi connecting residents to technology, education, and opportunities in STEAM careers.

Ashley Williams developed tech startup Clymb to address the mental health challenges of Black and brown youth in underserved communities.

Kezia Williams is the CEO and Founder of The Black upStart, an organization dedicated to addressing the capital, credit and mentorship gaps facing Black entrepreneurs.

Michael Running Wolf (Northern Cheyenne/Lakota/Blackfeet) is founder of the First Languages AI Reality (FLAIR) Initiative, working to preserve the linguistic and cultural heritage of Indigenous communities throughout the continent.

Reference: Social Justice Innovation Awards (sjiawards.org) 

William Sloane Coffin, Jr. Peacemaker Awards

Since 2007, Peace Action Fund of New York State has presented an annual award to outstanding individuals who “stay on the stony, long and ofttimes lonely road that leads to peace.” The William Sloane Coffin, Jr. Award is presented to activists who exemplified activism and made an impact in achieving a more peaceful world.  The award is named after William Sloane Coffin Jr. (1924 – 2006), an American Christian clergyman and long-time peace activist.  He was a leader in the civil rights movement and peace movements of the 1960s and 1970s - prominently opposing United States military interventions in conflicts, from the Vietnam War to the Iraq War.

The 2023 winners are:

Amy Goodman, host and executive producer of Democracy Now!, a national award-winning news program airing daily on  more than 1400 public television and radio stations worldwide.  (Readers will note that Democracy Now! is one of this blog's most important sources of information.)  The citation for her award reads, in part, "For almost 40 years, Amy has been illuminating the stories of front-line communities and producing high-quality, independent reporting to shed light on crises across the globe...Peace Action Fund of New York State is pleased to recognize Amy Goodman with the 2023 William Sloane Coffin, Jr. Peacemaker Award to honor her contributions to independent reporting and global peacemaking."

Afghans for a Better Tomorrow (AFBT), a group of dedicated progressive organizers in the Afghan diaspora devoted to a vision for a peaceful Afghanistan.  The citation for the award reads, in part, "AFBT is organizing the Afghan diaspora community for political power to build a better future for Afghans in the US and abroad whose lives have been uprooted by the legacy of US militarism...Peace Action Fund of New York State is pleased to present the 2023 William Sloane Coffin Jr. Peacemaker Award to Afghans for a Better Tomorrow for their incredible work in amplifying the voices of vulnerable Afghans harmed by US militarism.  This group of young organizers is already making an...impact in building a more just and peaceful future for the people of Afghanistan and for the Afghan diaspora."

Kareem Abdul-Jabbar Social Justice Champion Award (NBA)

Golden State Warriors guard Stephen Curry was named the Kareem Abdul-Jabbar Social Justice Champion Award winner for the 2022-2023 season.  

The honor, named after the six-time NBA MVP, is given to the player who best embodies Abdul-Jabbar's message of civil rights, Black empowerment and racial equality.  Curry -- a four-time NBA champion and two-time MVP -- was selected based on his work in advocating for voting rights, gender and racial equity in sports, and food scarcity in underserved communities.

Reference: Stephen Curry wins Kareem Abdul-Jabbar Social Justice Champion Award - ESPN 

COP 28 has ended - now what?

POSTED DECEMBER 14, 2023

The UN's annual conference on climate change has ended.  Major outcomes included:

The key controversy of the conference was the wording that the world's nations should "phase down" the use of fossil fuels - rather than "phase out."

The United States, the European Union, and scores of other countries were generally pleased with the outcome of the talks, saying the deal maintained a chance of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above the pre-industrial average.  I think their optimism is misplaced.  To achieve this target, the world must reduce carbon emissions from 2019 levels by 43% by 2030 and 60% by 2035.  According to the World Resources Institute, current national climate plans (i.e., pre-COP 28),  will only achieve an 8% reduction by 2030 at best

There's a long way to go if we are to avoid the worst effects, the irreversible effects, of global warming.  Nevertheless COP 28 provides some goals:

(a) Tripling renewable energy capacity globally and doubling the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements by 2030;

(b) Accelerating efforts towards the phase-down of unabated coal power; 

(c) Accelerating efforts globally towards net zero emission energy systems, utilizing zero- and low-carbon fuels well before or by around mid-century;

(d) Transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems, in a just, orderly and equitable manner, accelerating action in this critical decade, so as to achieve net zero by 2050 in keeping with the science;

(e) Accelerating zero- and low-emission technologies, including, [among others], renewables, nuclear, abatement and removal technologies such as carbon capture and utilization and storage, particularly in hard-to-abate sectors, and low-carbon hydrogen production;

(f) Accelerating and substantially reducing non-carbon-dioxide emissions globally, including in particular methane emissions by 2030;

(g) Accelerating the reduction of emissions from road transport on a range of pathways, including through development of infrastructure and rapid deployment of zero and low-emission vehicles;

(h) Phasing out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies that do not address energy poverty or just transitions, as soon as possible.

But we knew all this in 2016, when the Paris Agreement was struck.  We are now halfway to 2030, and nations have yet to demonstrate the political will to achieve anywhere near the reductions necessary.  Of course, we need to keep trying.  But we also need to make the necessary enormous investments to prepare for a radically changed planet.

Preparing for a radically changed planet - Apr 21, 2021  (The Sciences)


Sources: World Resources Institute, Reuters,  COP28 pact  

Latin America Update

POSTED DECEMBER 28, 2023

December marks the 200th anniversary of the Monroe Doctrine.  Established as a means of keeping European nations from interfering in the affairs of the Western Hemisphere, it became a tool and an excuse for the United States to intervene in the internal affairs of our neighbors to the south.  For more than a century, the US has intervened, almost entirely to no good effect, in Latin American nations with only the occasional gesture – such as FDR's “Good Neighbor Policy” and Obama's rapprochement with Cuba - towards acknowledging their rights as sovereign nations.  This week we take a look at recent events in Guatemala, Venezuela, and Argentina.

Guatemala [1,2,3,4]

In August, progressive candidate Bernardo Arévalo won a landslide victory in Guatemala's presidential election.  The 64-year-old former diplomat and son of former President Juan José Arévalo won 58 percent of the vote to former First Lady Sandra Torres’ 37 percent. Arévalo captured the national sentiment running as a political outsider and an anti-corruption reformer. He promised to alleviate poverty by investing in job creation and infrastructure. He vowed to increase agricultural production and provide for farmers. He refused to craft alliances with the political establishment and pledged to govern in a new, transparent way.  Even as the election results were being finalized, concerns arose that Guatemala's elite would try to overturn the election results in the long wait until his January 14, 2024 inauguration.  

Those concerns were not misplaced.  Earlier this month, public prosecutors raised the prospect of the presidential election being overturned.  The backlash was swift.  The Organization of American States (OAS) condemned their statements as an attempted coup d'etat, and Guatemala’s Supreme Electoral Tribunal declared the results of this year’s presidential race “unalterable”.  On Wednesday, The U.S. State Department placed several prosecutors in Guatemala on a corruption blacklist over their attempts to block Guatemala’s President-elect Bernardo Arévalo from taking office.

Venezuela [5, 6, 7, 11]

With recently elected left-wing presidents in Brazil, Chile and Colombia leading the way, Latin American nations are restoring their ambassadors to Venezuela.  After 15 years of  sanctions and its support for a failed coup attempt to overturn the election of Nicolas Maduro in 2019, Washington is re-assessing its punitive treatment of Venezuela.  The recent prisoner exchange is a welcome sign of a possible thaw in US-Venezuela relations.   U.S. citizens freed in a prisoner exchange with Venezuela were repatriated last week, while released Colombian businessman Alex Saab landed in Venezuela, where he met with close ally President Nicolás Maduro.  Saab had been taken from the island nation of Cape Verde without any proper legal basis and flown to Miami in 2021.  Maduro welcomed the prisoner exchange as a positive step in U.S.-Venezuela relations.   

US sanctions have come with a deadly cost for Venezuelans.  As a result of over 15 years of sanctions on Venezuela, $5.5 billion of Venezuelan funds in international accounts have been frozen, leading to critical shortages of food and medical supplies.  According to the Center for Economic and Policy Research, sanctions have affected more than 300,000 Venezuelans’ access to healthcare. This startling number includes 80,000 HIV-infected patients, 16,000 individuals in need of dialysis, and 16,000 cancer patients. Food imports have also dramatically decreased over the last decade—from $11.2 billion of purchases in 2013 to $2.46 billion in 2018—unequivocally due to a collapse of government revenue directly tied to restrictive sanctions.  

Most Venezuelan funds are still frozen by U.S sanctions, funds that are intended for humanitarian purposes. A year ago, a humanitarian agreement was reached between the Venezuelan government and the opposition, promising to use these funds for much-needed programs in health, education, food security, and electricity, all under the administration of the United Nations. Regrettably, these funds have not yet been released. You can find the Code Pink petition here.

Argentina [8, 9, 10]

In November, in the midst of a severe economic crisis, Javier Milei, the self-proclaimed anarcho-capitalist, was elected president of Argentina. Milei’s victory signifies an enormous rupture with Argentina’s past and presents many questions about its future. With a radical right-wing, antisystem president at the helm and the people who elected him deeply dissatisfied with the status quo, democracy in Argentina is moving headlong in a wholly unknown direction.  Many of his proposals are radical, including dollarizing the economy and closing the central bank, drastically shrinking the role of the state, and privatizing all education and healthcare. He has argued that there should be a free market for selling organs and children, and more freedom to buy guns.

In December, the newly inaugurated President ordered a major deregulation of the national economy, following through on his campaign promise and using executive powers to undo or change 300 rules. These include eliminating laws regulating rents and preventing the privatization of state companies. Milei also announced measures to deregulate labor, trade, tourism, pharmaceuticals and other areas. Following the announcement, thousands of people took to the streets in the first public demonstration since Milei’s inauguration. Despite threats from Milei to cut off government benefits to anyone who blocks streets, protests are continuing in Argentina this week after his sweeping economic shock measures caused prices to soar.



Sources: [1] Americas Quarterly [2] Al Jazeera [3] Center for American Progress [4] Democracy Now!-1 [5] Georgetown Public Policy Review  [6] Democracy Now! - 2 [7] Code Pink [8] Journal of Democracy [9] Democracy Now! - 3 [10] Democracy Now! - 4  [11] Foreign Policy

Protesters take to the streets in Argentina

President Maduro embraces Alex Saab after prisoner exchange with US

The forgotten war in Sudan

POSTED FEBRUARY 19, 2024

Ten months into Sudan’s civil war between the paramilitary RSF (Rapid Support Forces) and the Sudanese army, the country is facing rising levels of hunger.  An acute food emergency could kill hundreds of thousands of people by next year.  Compounding the crisis levels of hunger, water-borne diseases are also causing extreme levels of malnourishment across the country, especially among children. In December, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), declared a cholera outbreak in Gadarif, a state in the far east.  

Calling for $4.1 billion in aid, the United Nations estimates that about 18 million people are facing emergency levels of hunger – double the figure from last year.  The war has affected food availability and people’s ability to buy it across Africa's third largest country.  Many people have  not been able to harvest their crops due to displacement or after their land was ravaged.  The RSF has looted aid warehouses.  The Sudanese army is restricting aid to regions under RSF control and cracking down on grassroots initiatives trying to feed their communities, such as the Emergency Response Rooms (ERRs).  Many aid groups left the country after the outbreak of the war due to lawlessness and insecurity and these community-based initiatives play a vital role in feeding people.  Despite this, the global community is failing to support them.  Western donors are hesitant to directly finance ERRs because they struggle to trace how each dollar is spent.  Meanwhile the people starve. 

Sudan has suffered armed conflict for much of its existence since it formally obtained independence from Great Britain and Egypt in 1956.  When Sudan gained its independence on New Year's Day in 1956, two features stood out in the new nation: it was the largest country in Africa, and it was already embroiled in civil war that had erupted several months earlier.  

Britain and Egypt jointly ruled Sudan for the first half of the 20th century and essentially treated the north and the south as two separate colonial territories. That division carried over when Sudan became independent, with Arab Muslims in the north dominating the country, alienating African Christians and other groups in the south and the west.  Sudan has a wide range of ethnic, linguistic and tribal differences. Residents in remote parts of the country feel the elites in Khartoum monopolize the country's limited resources.  The result: Sudan has suffered three civil wars (1955-1972, 1983-2005, 2023-present) [link below left] and several less widespread conflicts (such as the War in Darfur, 2003-2020 and the later stages of the ) spanning most of the country's 68 years of independence. 

The First and Second Sudan Civil Wars were largely fought between the northern and southern parts of the country.  Numerous discussions, cease-fires, and agreements between southern leaders and their northern counterparts occurred but yielded very little success until the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement, which ended warfare and generated an outline of new measures to share power, distribute wealth, and provide security in Sudan.  It also granted southern Sudan semiautonomous status and stipulated that a referendum on independence for the region would be held in six years.   The referendum finally did take place in  January 2011, with the results indicating the south’s overwhelming preference to secede. The country of South Sudan declared independence on July 9, 2011. 

The current civil war in Sudan erupted in April 2023 after relations between the two wings of Sudan’s security apparatus broke down, rapidly spread beyond the capital, Khartoum.  Recently, the Sudan Armed Forces have suffered numerous setbacks at the hands of the Rapid Support Forces. For months, army units have struggled to break their grip on much of the capital. The Rapid Support Forces and their allied militias have overrun most of Darfur and swathes of South Kordofan in western Sudan. Since December 2023, Rapid Support Forces columns have also advanced into central and eastern Sudan. 

More than 13,000 have been killed, 4,000,000 have been internally displaced, and 1,000,000 women, children, and older persons have fled Sudan and crossed into neighboring countries.  The war is creating “economic, social and political ripple effects” beyond Sudan's borders and neighboring countries are working to return Sudan to a peaceful transition to democracy. In late January, the African Union named a team to work on a peaceful end to Sudan’s civil war. The team will engage Sudan’s feuding military factions alongside civil society and international players to resolve the conflict.  

Peacebuilding efforts are more likely to succeed when they are led by local groups based in affected communities. In the Horn of Africa, a region marked by persistent conflicts, a consortium between the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) and the All-Africa Conference of Churches (AACC), known as the Salama Hub, has been equipping local peacebuilders with the tools needed to advocate for peace and non-violent responses to conflict.  In December, the Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL) partnered with AFSC and the Salama Hub to support a delegation of African peace activists visiting Washington, D.C. to advocate in Congress and the State Department.  During this trip, FCNL’s peacebuilding team spoke with Enass Muzamel, a Sudanese pro-democracy activist and human rights defender coordinating efforts to support women and girls facing the ongoing conflict in Sudan.  [link below right]

Links to support pages: Friends Committee on National Legislation, American Friends Service Committee, Sudan Relief Fund


Sources: Al Jazeera, NPR, Wikipedia, Britannica, Friends Committee on National Legislation, The Conversation - 1, The Conversation-2