The major problem surrounding historiology is that as long as the nature of time and historicity are not understood, the concept of process appears artificially grafted onto its explanations, rather than the explanations deriving from the concept. That is why we must insist that a rigorous approach be taken with this problem. But time and again philosophy has had to abandon its attempts to develop such an explanation—for example, in the case of its endeavor to be a positive science, as in Comte; a science of logic, as in Hegel; a critique of language, as in Wittgenstein; or a science of propositional calculus, as in Russell. Therefore, when phenomenology does in fact appear to fulfill the requirements of a rigorous science, we are led to ask whether there is in it the possibility of giving a foundation to historiology. Before this can happen, however, we must deal with a few difficulties.
In: Historiological Discussions, Silo
Chapter 3: History and Temporality, 3.1 Temporality and Process
Philosopher.
1889 Born on 26 April in Vienna.
1908 Begins studying mechanical engineering in Manchester, later develops an interest in logic and mathematics.
1911 Moves to Cambridge to study philosophy with Bertrand Russell.
1918 Completes the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus during the First World War.
1921 Publication of the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, an influential work of analytical philosophy.
1929 Return to Cambridge; resumption of philosophical work, habilitation with the Tractatus.
1939 Appointed professor of philosophy at Cambridge.
1945-51 Work on the Philosophical Investigations, published posthumously.
1951 Death in Cambridge on 29 April.
Topics
Philosophy of language: Wittgenstein was concerned with the nature of language and its relationship to reality. In his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, he suggested that language functions as a logical representation of facts. He argues that the meaning of sentences is linked to their ability to describe states in the world.
For example, ‘The cat is lying on the carpet’ is a logical expression even if the cat is not lying on the carpet, because we can imagine it. But you cannot imagine the ‘meaning of life’.
Language games: in his Philosophical Investigations, Wittgenstein introduces the concept of ‘language games’, which emphasises the diversity of language use in different contexts. He rejects the idea of a fixed essence of language and argues that meaning is determined by usage and social context.
Criticism of logical positivism (an analytical and scientific approach in philosophy that aims to establish a solid foundation for knowledge by rejecting metaphysical speculation): Wittgenstein criticises logical positivism, in particular the principle of verifiability, which states that the meaning of a sentence must be empirically verifiable. He challenges this distinction between meaningful and non-meaningful statements, thereby broadening our understanding of what can be considered meaningful.
The nature of reality and knowledge: His philosophy also addresses questions about the nature of reality and how we can know the world. Wittgenstein insists that our perceptions and experiences are always mediated by language, which influences our understanding of reality.
Historicity and subjectivity: The question of historicity is also present in his thinking, particularly with regard to how linguistic practices and meanings develop over time and in different cultural contexts. This raises questions about subjectivity and individuality in the construction of meaning.
Philosophy as therapy: Wittgenstein viewed philosophy as a form of therapy, aimed at clearing up conceptual confusions. He believed that many philosophical problems resulted from misunderstandings about language and that clearing up these misunderstandings could clear up the problems.
Major works
‘Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus’ (1922): This is Wittgenstein's fundamental work, in which he develops his theory of the image of language. He argues that language maps reality through a system of logical sentences. Meaningful statements are those that describe states in the world. This work had a great influence on analytical philosophy and logical positivism.
Philosophical Investigations (published posthumously in 1953): In this work, Wittgenstein criticises and questions the ideas presented in the ‘Tractatus’. He focuses on the use of language in everyday contexts and introduces terms such as ‘language games’ and ‘life forms’.
Influence
Wittgenstein's work had a profound influence on analytical philosophy, shifting the focus from metaphysical questions to the analysis of language and its use. His ideas continue to inspire generations of philosophers and researchers in fields such as linguistics, psychology and social theory.
Silo's quote highlights the difficulties that philosophy has in explaining fundamental concepts such as the nature of time and historicity.
Silo describes the need for ‘rigorous thinking’ to address complex issues such as time and historicity. This requires a rigorous and methodical approach to understanding these concepts, which are often neglected or misunderstood in philosophy.
The failure of philosophy: Silo points out that philosophy has often failed when it comes to explaining these issues, partly because it has tried to adapt to scientific or logical models. He refers, for example, to :
Auguste Comte and his positivism, which tried to create a social science based on empirical principles.
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, who advocated a dialectical and historical approach, but whose concepts are sometimes perceived as too abstract.
Ludwig Wittgenstein, who focused on linguistic problems rather than existential issues.
Bertrand Russell, who developed logical and mathematical systems but was also criticised for his analytical approach, which can ignore the human and historical dimension of problems.