The Spenglerian vision of “civilization” as the final stage of a culture did not stop Toynbee (23) from taking civilization as the unit of research. In fact, in the introduction to his Study of History Toynbee discusses the problem of the minimum historical unit, discarding “national history” as isolated and unreal because history in fact corresponds to multiple entities that embrace a more extended region. What is important to him above all is the comparative study of civilizations, a concept that we often find replaced by that of “society.” Of greatest interest (for our purposes) is Toynbee’s interpretation of the historical process. No longer is the subject of history a biological being marked by destiny, but rather an entity that, between the open and the closed, is guided by impulses or circumspection in facing obstacles.
We must also take note of Toynbee’s explanation of social movement as involving challenge and response. He does not, however, use the term “impulse” in a strictly Bergsonian sense, nor is his use of the idea of challenge-response a simple transplanting of stimulus-response or Pavlovian reflex. Finally, what is of most interest to us is his understanding that the great religions transcend the disintegration of civilizations, and that they are what allows us to have the intuition of a “plan” and a “purpose” in history. In any event, the accommodation of his model to a particular historical form kept him from an understanding of temporality.
In: Historiological Discussions, Silo,
Chapter 2: The Past Seen as Without Temporal Foundation 2.2 History as Form
1849 Born on 14 September in Ryazan, Russia, as Ivan Petrovich Pavlov, son of a priest.
1870 Begins his studies at the University of St. Petersburg: Pavlov first studied theology but then switched to medicine and natural sciences, specialising in physiology.
1875 Graduated from St. Petersburg with a gold medal and began his career as a scientist.
1883 Doctorate with a dissertation on the cardiovascular mechanism: His doctoral thesis laid the foundation for his career as a physiologist.
1890 Appointed to the Institute of Experimental Medicine in St. Petersburg: Pavlov became head of the Department of Physiology, where he conducted his groundbreaking experiments.
1901 Start of experiments on conditioned reflexes: research into learning processes in dogs, particularly the relationships between stimulus and response.
1904 Awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his research into digestive physiology, in particular the discovery of the function of the salivary glands.
1920s Research on higher nervous activity of brain functions and development of the theory of ‘higher nervous activity’, which explained the behaviour of animals and humans
1923 Publication of works on psychophysiology: his research findings had a major influence on psychology, particularly on the understanding of conditioning.
1936 Died in Leningrad on 27 February (now St. Petersburg)
The first-born son of a priest and grandson of a sacristan, he spent his youth in Ryazan, central Russia, with eleven brothers and sisters. He attended a church school and a theological seminary, where he distinguished himself through his devotion to the teachings. From childhood, he showed a particular interest in nature in general and animals in particular. In 1870, he dropped out of theology to study chemistry and physiology at the University of St. Petersburg.
Inspired by the progressive ideas propagated by D. I. Pisarev, the major Russian literary critic of the 1860s, and I. M. Sechenov, the father of Russian physiology, Pavlov decided to devote his life to science. In 1870, he enrolled in the Faculty of Physics and Mathematics to pursue a scientific degree. He became fascinated by physiology, which was to remain his main area of interest throughout his life. In the 1890s, he studied the secretory activity of the digestive system. This work culminated in his monumental book ‘Lectures on the Work of the Digestive Glands’, published in 1902, which formed part of the basis for the Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology, which he received in 1904. His most important contribution was the description of the ‘conditioned reflex’ (‘условный рефлекс’), which was incorrectly translated from Russian as ‘conditioned reflex’, leading to the misinterpretation that such reflexes were produced by the process of ‘conditioning’.
Topics
Academic Life: Pavlov's greatest contribution
Pavlov's research into the physiology of digestion led him to define the science of ‘conditioned reflexes’, paying particular attention to the ‘psychic phase’ of secretion. In a now-classic experiment, Pavlov trained a hungry dog to salivate when it heard a bell that was paired with the sight of food. Simply put, food presentation systematically triggered a salivation response. When the presentation of food was frequently associated with a neutral stimulus, in this case the sound of a bell, these simultaneously experienced stimuli (presentation of food plus sound of the bell) led to a state in which the neutral stimulus (the sound of the bell) could trigger the same systematic salivation reaction as the sight of the food. This new conditional reaction was considered a ‘mental reaction’ because there was no longer any physical connection between the acoustic stimulus and the salivary reflex. For Pavlov, this new connection between stimuli required a change at the neuronal level, which he located in the cerebral cortex, which he saw as the site of mental processes. Thus, Pavlov developed a conceptual approach that emphasised the importance of conditioning and linked human behaviour to the nervous system. In 1903, at the XIV International Medical Congress in Madrid, Pavlov gave a lecture on ‘Experimental Psychology and Psychopathology of Animals’. In it, he proved that a conditioned reflex should be considered a psychophysiological phenomenon. From this it was concluded that the conditioned reflex is indicative of the mechanism of the most highly developed forms of reaction to the world in both animals and humans, and thus enables an ‘objective’ study of mental activity. The fact that Pavlov and his colleagues proved that conditioned reflexes originate in the cerebral cortex revealed for the first time the fundamental laws that govern the functioning of the cerebral cortex and the large cerebral hemispheres. Thus, the integrated Pavlovian theory of higher nervous activity was formed. Later, Pavlov described three principles for the theory of reflexes: the principle of determinism, the principle of analysis and synthesis, and the principle of structure.
Major works
Pavlov, I.P. 1902. The Work of the Disgestive Glands. London: Griffin.
Pavlov, I.P. 1927. Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Pavlov, I.P. 1928. Lectures on Conditioned Reflexes: Twenty-five Years of Objective Study of the High Nervous Activity (Behavior) of Animals. Translated by W. Horsley Gantt. New York: International.
Pavlov, I.P. 1955. Selected Works. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
Pavlov, I.P. 1994. Psychopathology and Psychiatry. New Jersey: Transaction.
Influence
In the field of psychology, Pavlov's research laid the foundation for the development of so-called ‘behaviourism’, which assumes that behavioural reactions can be traced back to external stimuli and that these reactions can be changed or conditioned by learning processes. Pavlov thus contributed to our understanding of associative learning processes.
Pavlov received worldwide recognition and left behind a large school of physiologists, from which many important students emerged. His admirable scientific legacy consists of the fact that he left behind a brilliant group of students who further developed the ideas of their teacher, and a multitude of followers around the world who are still gaining new insights based on his research today.
Why is he mentioned by Silo in ‘Historiological Discussions’?
Silo mentions Pavlov in connection with his comment on how Toynbee already considers civilisation to be the minimum historical unit of study. Silo notes that for our purposes the most interesting interpretation of the historical process is the one in which the subject of history is a being guided by impulses or attachments between the open and the closed. However, he clarifies that these impulses are not considered from a Bergsonian or Pavlovian point of view, by which he refers to the Pavlovian view, in which the reaction to the world is given as a psycho-neurobiological reflex that depends on the circumstances of the environment, transforming the reaction into a mechanical one that is determined only by external factors.