Even in the writings of the “Father of History” an interest can clearly be seen in emphasizing the differences between his people and the barbarians. (2) And in Titus Livius the narrative is transformed in order to contrast the virtues of the old Republic with the period of the Empire in which the author lives. (3) This purposeful method of presenting facts and customs is foreign neither to historians of the East or the West. They have, from the very beginnings of written narrative, constructed a particular history out of the landscape of their epoch. Affected as they were by their times, many manipulated the facts not with any malice, but on the contrary, considering that their task was to bring out the “historical truth” that had been suppressed or hidden by the powerful.
(3) Titus Livius Livy, 59 b.c.e.–17 c.e., History of Rome (later known as The Decades).
In: Historiological Discussions, Silo
Chapter 1: The Past as Viewed from the Present 1.1 The Distortion of Mediated History
Roman historian
59 BC: Birth of Titus Livius in Patavium (present-day Padua, Italy). Livius was born into a wealthy family that belonged to the Roman upper class.
31 BC: Battle of Actium and the beginning of the reign of Augustus. Livius lived through a period of upheaval that marked the end of the Roman Republic and the beginning of the Roman Empire. Augustus is one of his main supporters, which influences his work.
27 BC Beginning of work on Ab Urbe Condita (literally ‘From the Foundation of the City’), his major work. The work tells the story of Rome from its mythical foundation to his time and originally comprised 142 books. It is considered one of the most important works of Roman historiography.
20 BC Contact with Augustus. It is assumed that Titus Livius got to know Augustus and the Roman imperial court in Rome at this time and may have been encouraged to continue working on his work. Augustus and Livius had a respectful, but not always harmonious, relationship.
14 AD: Death of Augustus. The completion of Ab Urbe Condita may have been decided by this time. Titus Livius is held in high esteem in Rome and is an important historian of his time.
c. 14–17: Return to Patavium. Livius leaves Rome and returns to his hometown, possibly for reasons of age or because his work is already completed.
17 AD Death of Titus Livius in Patavium. His work remains one of the most comprehensive historical works of ancient times. It was read and quoted over the centuries, although only about a quarter of his books have been handed down in their entirety.
Topics
The founding and mythical origins of Rome: Livy devotes a significant portion of his work to describing the founding myths of Rome, including the legend of Romulus and Remus.
The political and institutional development of Rome: Describes the development of Roman institutions such as the Senate, magistrates and popular assemblies.
Rome's wars and territorial expansion: the military conflicts that made Rome a Mediterranean power, including the Punic Wars against Carthage.
Roman values and virtues: Livy highlights the moral qualities he considers typically Roman, such as pietas, virtus and gravitas, through historical examples.
The conflict between patricians and plebeians: He devotes a great deal of attention to the internal struggles between these two social groups and their impact on the political development of Rome.
Moral decadence: Especially in the books dealing with the more recent past, Livy reflects on what he perceives as the decline of traditional Roman morals and values.
Major works
‘Ab urbe condita libri’ (From the founding of the city), also known simply as ‘The Decades’.
Titus Livius wrote a history of Rome from the founding of the city in 753 BC to the death of Nero Claudius Drusus in 9 BC.
The work consisted of 142 books (papyrus scrolls), which were divided into decades or groups of ten books. Of these, only 35 have survived, bearing the numbers 1-10 and 21-45.
The surviving books contain the history of the first centuries of Rome, from its founding in 753 BC to 292 BC, the Second Punic War and the Roman conquest of Gaul, Greece, Macedonia and part of Asia Minor.
Florus wrote an epitome of all his books, a work that has been preserved and allows us to see the plan of Titus Livius and the order of his narratives.
Influence
Influence on later Roman authors: Many Roman authors used Livy's work as a source, including Aurélio Vítor, Cassiodoro, Eutrópio, Festo, Floro, Grânio Liciniano and Orósio. This shows that his work became an important historical reference in ancient Rome.
Literary influence: His work Ab Urbe condita libri had such a great impact that it influenced later writers such as Machiavelli, Alexis de Tocqueville and Montesquieu. This shows that his influence extended beyond antiquity to the Renaissance and the Enlightenment.
Preservation and study of his work: Although only 35 of the original 142 books of ‘Ab Urbe condita’ have survived, summaries (periochae) were created from the 1st century AD that allowed the content of the lost volumes to be known. This proves the lasting interest in his work.
Influence on historiography: Livy's style of historiography was seen as a great novelty by Renaissance authors such as Machiavelli, Guicciardini and Alberti, enabling them to ‘escape the “grades de ferro” of their time’.
Source for other works: Julius Obsequentus used Livy's work to write ‘De Prodigiis’, an account of miraculous and supernatural events in Rome.
Influence on education: Quintilian included Livy among the greatest historians of antiquity, suggesting that his work was used in Roman education.
Influence on historical thinking: His focus on the history of Rome from its founding to his own time was a model for later Roman historiography.
Why is he mentioned by Silo in ‘Historiological Discussions’?
Silo himself gives us a very clear answer here:
‘... With Livy, history is transformed into a contrast between the virtues of the ancient republic and the imperial age in which he lived. This intentional way of presenting facts and customs is not foreign to historians of the East and West, who, from the beginning of written records, construct a particular history from their own epochal landscape.’