Even in the writings of the “Father of History” an interest can clearly be seen in emphasizing the differences between his people and the barbarians. (2) And in Titus Livius the narrative is transformed in order to contrast the virtues of the old Republic with the period of the Empire in which the author lives. (3) This purposeful method of presenting facts and customs is foreign neither to historians of the East or the West. They have, from the very beginnings of written narrative, constructed a particular history out of the landscape of their epoch. Affected as they were by their times, many manipulated the facts not with any malice, but on the contrary, considering that their task was to bring out the “historical truth” that had been suppressed or hidden by the powerful. (4)
(4) For example, consider the following quotation: “I begin this work with the time when Servius Galba, with Titus Vinius for his colleague, was consul for the second time. Many authors have given accounts of the earlier period, the 820 years dating from the founding of the city, and many of them wrote of the dealings of the Roman people with eloquence and freedom. After the conflict at Actium, when for the sake of peace it became necessary that all power should be centered in one man, these great intellects vanished. And with this, history’s truths suffered in many ways.” The Histories, Tacitus. (Unpublished translation from the Latin by Salvatore Puledda and Daniel Zuckerbrot.)
In: Historiological Discussions, Silo
Chapter 1: The Past as Viewed from the Present 1.1 The Distortion of Mediated History
Historian and politician.
c. 55 AD Birth of Publius (or Gaius) Cornelius Tacitus, probably in northern Italy or southern Gaul.
77/78 Marriage to the daughter of the respected senator Gnaeus Iulius Agricola.
c. 81 Beginning of his political career under Emperor Titus; entry into the Senate and later into the cursus honorum.
88 Appointment as a praetor and member of the Quindecimviri, a college of priests responsible for the Sibylline books.
c. 97 Consulate under Emperor Nerva; this marks the high point of his political career.
98 Publication of Agricola, a biography of his father-in-law, and Germania, an ethnographic work about the Germanic tribes.
c. 110-120 Composition of his major works, Historiae and Annales, which cover the history of the Roman Empire from 69 to 96 AD and from Augustus to Nero, respectively.
after 120 Death of Tacitus (exact date and circumstances unknown).
The Roman historian, philosopher and senator Tacitus was born at a time when Rome was in a state of political and social upheaval under the Emperor Nero. He came from a family of equites and held several posts in the Roman administration.
He is known for his concise style, his critical view of imperial power and his detailed and often gloomy portrayal of Roman politics.
Topics
1. Power and tyranny
In his works, Tacitus examines how power is acquired, exercised and abused. He is particularly critical of the tyranny and despotism of the emperors, especially the early emperors such as Tiberius, Nero and Domitian. His descriptions emphasise the negative effects of unrestricted power on individuals and societies.
2. Morals and corruption
Another central theme is the moral decline that Tacitus recognises in both the Roman upper class and the political leadership. He shows how the pursuit of power, treachery and corruption have undermined the moral values of the Republic and turned the imperial era into an era of opportunism and fear.
3. Conflict between freedom and authority
Tacitus addresses the loss of republican freedoms under imperial rule. He compares the former republican order, which was characterised by a certain political freedom, with the later imperial autocracy. In doing so, he highlights the tensions that exist between the pursuit of freedom and the need for order and stability.
4. Relations between Rome and the provinces
In his works ‘The Germania’ and ‘The Agriculture’, Tacitus deals with Roman expansion and the encounter with foreign cultures. He describes the Germanic peoples as freedom-loving and morally upright in comparison to the corrupt Romans, which can be understood as an indirect criticism of the decadence of Rome.
Major works
‘The Annals’: This work covers the history of the Roman Empire under the emperors Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius and Nero, i.e. from 14 to 68 AD. It is one of his best-known works, although only part of the books has been handed down in its entirety.
‘The Histories’ (Historiae): This work deals with the turbulent years of the Roman Empire after Nero's death and covers the reigns of the emperors Galba, Otto, Vitellius and Vespasian, i.e. from 69 to 96 AD. Unfortunately, only part of this work has survived.
‘The Life of Agricola’ (De vita et moribus Iulii Agricolae): This is a biography of his father-in-law, Agricola, a Roman general known for his campaign in Britain. The work is both an obituary and an important historical document about the conquest of Britain.
‘Germania’ (De origine et situ Germanorum): This ethnographic treatise describes the Germanic peoples and their customs. It offers a contrast to Roman practices and a preview of the tribes that were to play an increasingly important role in Roman history.
Influence
Perspectives on Power: His analysis of the mechanisms of power and political intrigue provides valuable insights into the administration of the Roman Empire and the nature of imperial regimes.
Methodology: Tacitus is also known for his rigorous methodology, in which he used various sources, including official documents and personal statements. He emphasised a critical approach to sources, although he was also influenced by his own opinions and prejudices.
Tacitus remains a central figure for the study of Roman history and offers a detailed and often critical perspective on the Roman Empire and its rulers. His works are crucial for understanding Roman politics, society and culture during this period.
He serves here as an example of an early historian who attempts to recount the (in his opinion) ‘historical truth’ that has been suppressed or obscured by those in power.
Tacitus formulated the claim in several of his books to report impartially, in a certain way neutrally, as for example in his histories ‘Neque amore quisquam et sine odio’ (about no one with affection and without hatred) or the annals ‘Sine ira et studio’ (without anger and zeal).
In the annals, he also emphasised his supposed independence as a historian with the formulation: ‘Praecipuum munus annalium reor ne virtutes sileantur utque pravis dictis factisque ex posteritate et infamia metus sit.’ This means, in essence: ‘I consider it the noblest task of historiography to ensure that virtues are not kept secret and that bad words and deeds must fear the judgement of posterity and shame.’