Various authors (Dromel, Lorenz, Petersen, Wechssler, Pinder, Drerup, Mannheim, and so on) have addressed the theme of the generations, but it is Ortega y Gasset who must be recognized for having established in his theory of generations the key to understanding the intrinsic movement of the historical process. (31)
In: Historiological Discussions, Silo,
Chapter 3: History and Temporality, 3.2 Horizon and Temporal Landscape
1878 Born on 25 June in Kassel, Germany
1903 Doctorate with a thesis on Romanesque interiors in Normandy
1910 Habilitation and start of teaching at the University of Munich
1915 Appointed as professor of art history at the University of Breslau
1920 Moved to the University of Munich, where he wrote his most important works on art history
1945 Dismissed from his university post after the end of the Second World War
1947 Died in Munich
Topics
Art history of the Middle Ages and Baroque
Pinder's research focused on European art from the Middle Ages to the Baroque, with a particular focus on German topics
He received his doctorate in 1903 on Romanesque architecture
and wrote fundamental works on medieval architecture.
Generation research and periodisation
Pinder developed a generation-specific approach to the periodisation of art history in his influential essay ‘Art History by Generations’ (1926). His book, published in 1926, was referred to by sociologists as different as Ortega y Gasset and Karl Mannheim.
He coined concepts such as the ‘contemporaneity of the un-contemporary’ - the coexistence of different generations and styles.
German studies and völkisch art history
During the Nazi era, Pinder increasingly adopted völkisch-nationalist positions
He sought to identify the ‘essence’ of specifically German art and its ‘special achievements’.
Interdisciplinarity and morphology
Pinder promoted interdisciplinary exchange, for example in the journal ‘Die Gestalt’ with contributions from chemistry and botany
He built on Goethe's morphology and theory of forms and applied them to art history.
While Pinder was initially regarded as a brilliant medieval and baroque scholar, under National Socialism he increasingly turned to völkisch theories and a nationalist art history. However, his generation-specific approach remained influential.
Major works
‘Art History by Generations’ (1926)
This influential essay is considered Pinder's central work, in which he developed a generation-specific approach to the periodisation of art history. He coined concepts such as the ‘contemporaneity of the un-contemporaneous’ - the coexistence of different generations and styles.
Studies on medieval architecture
Pinder's 1903 doctoral thesis on Romanesque architecture in Normandy, as well as further works on medieval, particularly German, architecture, formed one research focus
‘Spirit of German Castles’ (1939)
This work is an example of Pinder's turn towards völkisch art history and ‘Deutschtumskunde’ (the study of German cultural identity) during the Nazi era, in which he sought the ‘essence’ of specifically German art
book series ‘Von Wesen und Werden deutscher Formen’ (from 1935). In this series, Pinder deepened his search for national characteristics and ‘special achievements’ of German art, albeit with certain concessions to racial thinking.
Influence
Pinder trained two generations of art historians and thus had a long-lasting influence not only through his publications, but also through his intensive teaching. It was only decades after his death that his fervent support of National Socialism was seriously questioned.
Pinder's 1926 essay ‘Art History by Generations’ is considered his central work, in which he first developed a generation-specific approach to the periodisation of art history. These ideas had a lasting influence on further generational research.
Why is he mentioned by Silo in ‘Historiological Discussions’?
Silo mentions him, along with other authors, in relation to the role of generations in history.
Wilhelm Pinder's major work on the question of generations in history is the essay ‘Art History by Generations’ from 1926. In this essay, Pinder develops the idea of periodising and analysing art history on the basis of a sequence of different generations:
Pinder assumes that people of different generations coexist as ‘self-contained beings (entelechies)’, without mutual exchange.
He recognises different ‘generational styles’ in the simultaneous presence of different styles in art.
Pinder speaks of the ‘simultaneity of the non-simultaneous’ - the coexistence of individuals and generations shaped by different times.
This approach of the co-presence of different generations significantly influenced Karl Mannheim's later concept of ‘historical generations’.