Why Does Mr. Lundahl Keep Judging My References Without Even Looking At Them?
Kevin R. Henke
November 14, 2022
In Henke (2022fy), I recommended that Mr. Lundahl read the following reference, Orear (1967), and learn some physics:
Orear, J. 1967. Fundamental Physics, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons: New York, 472pp.
From his statements in Lundahl (2022w), it’s obvious that Mr. Lundahl never bothered to get a copy of this book before judging it as inadequate:
“Mr. Henke's reference seems to be a book labelled Fundamental Physics. Fundamental seems close to starting point at explanation level, and precisely therefore very far from starting point on the proving or evidencing or demonstrating level.
If God made an exception, that would mean so much less "universality" for the law, but would not change its meaning for all masses on which it has any bearing.
To be clear, that masses usually behave like this is a fairly probable conclusion from observations (especially if Moon landing is genuine, etc, since otherwise Aristotelic gravity could hold).” [my emphasis]
This is not the first time that Mr. Lundahl has judged the contents of my recommended references without even looking at them (Henke 2022ho). Again, Mr. Lundahl’s approach to the literature and research is absolutely dreadful. He actually needs to read a book before judging it. There’s an old saying that literally applies here: “You can’t judge a book by its title.”
Instead of dealing with physics, Mr. Lundahl then speculates about what God could do. Mr. Lundahl fails to realize that the term Universal in Newton’s Universal Law of Gravitation allows for no exceptions. It should apply everywhere and in all circumstances in this Universe. If Mr. Lundahl wants God to be able to make local exceptions (i.e., miracles), he’s got to present some good evidence to support his speculation. He has not.