Mr. Lundahl is Still Not Carefully Reading My Essays, As Well As His Own Recommended Reference, Lewis (1960)
Kevin R. Henke
November 13, 2022
In Henke (2022fw), I further commented on the pool (billiard) game analogy in Lewis (1960, chapter 8) and gave the following conclusion:
“C.S. Lewis attached other important meanings to the pool game analogy that Lundahl (2022q) does not mention here. The reader can refer to our essays cited above for those discussions.”
The essays in Henke (2022fw) that I’m referencing are Lundahl (2022a), Henke (2022b), Henke (2022t), Henke (2022u) and Lundahl (2022q), which discuss the pool game analogy presented in Lewis (1960, pp. 90-92). Lundahl (2022w) then makes some unfounded accusations against Henke (2022fw):
“If so, Mr. Henke did not directly admit it. Nor does his reference give the pages for looking up the pool table analogy. He's giving the unwary reader the impression he is better familiar with the pool table analogy than I am. Not the case.”
In Henke (2022fw), I listed pages 90-92 in Lewis (1960), where the pool game analogy is discussed!! The very first sentence of Henke (2022fw) states:
“In Lundahl (2022a), Henke (2022b), Henke (2022t), Henke (2022u) and Lundahl (2022q), Mr. Lundahl and I have extensively discussed the pool game analogy presented in Lewis (1960, pp. 90-92).” [my emphasis]
I also should not always have to summarize and repeat what I’ve already written in my previously linked essays. There’s already a lot of repetition in our essays and I’ve tried very hard to keep it to a minimum that is still convenient for our readers. The readers can go to the links for more information. Now, Lewis (1960) was first recommended by Mr. Lundahl in Lundahl (2022a). Yet, he clearly does not understand the book and, apparently, he does not now have ready access to a copy of it (Henke 2022jd). Not only does Mr. Lundahl need to carefully read the pool game analogy and other statements in Lewis (1960) for once (Henke 2022kL; Henke 2022ch; Henke 2022jd), he needs to carefully read my essays rather than just glancing at them, missing critical information and arguments, and then making flippant and erroneous comments!
Reference:
Lewis, C.S. 1960. Miracles, 2nd ed., printed 1974: Harper One: HarperCollinsPublishers, 294pp.