Among Mr. Lundahl’s Racist Rambling, No Good Answers to the Critical Questions in the Title of Lundahl (2022u): “Why Catalogue the Supernatural? Why Catalogue Fiction?”
Kevin R. Henke
November 1, 2022
In Henke (2022ba) and some of my other essays in this debate, I challenged Mr. Lundahl’s efforts to distinguish fiction from history by cataloguing or classifying stories. The title of Lundahl (2022u) promised to answer these questions: “Why Catalogue the Supernatural? Why Catalogue Fiction?”. However, among the totally unnecessary racist rambling in Lundahl (2022u), Mr. Lundahl fails to give any good answers to these two questions. As I’ve stated before, the best way of distinguishing a history from a fictional story pretending to be history, such as Genesis 3, is not to try to catalogue the story, but to evaluate the available evidence for it. There’s not a shred of evidence to indicate that Genesis 3 is history. The story is so far-fetched and improbable that it’s best classified as a badly written myth trying to pretend to be an historical account.