Evaluation Example #1

Brewster Academy

Faculty Portal

Director Survey - AC

Name: Hess, Peter Date: 11/20/09 faculty id: FAC64 record id 274

Notes

I have many affirmations for Pete and only one minor piece of feedback which I think I will come to regret. In the affirmation category, Pete has been a clear and helpful guide and mentor. He and I share an affinity for how to use instructional technology in the classroom and the more \"structured\" side of teaching. This can be an ambitious undertaking when trying to bring structure to the humanities. History is vaporous, and Pete helps me to focus on the instruction, not the content. My only piece of feedback is that I need him to tell me what to do more. (See, I told you I would regret writing this.) I think he sensed this last year, as he has brought structure to our meetings this year with a regular agenda of questions: BMP\'s, observations, student issues, curriculum issues, etc. This is very helpful to me.

Always 1. Has thorough knowledge of teaching approaches and methodologies employed in the Brewster Program

Always 2. Responsibility is taken for attainment of school wide goals

Mostly 3. Ensures direct, frequent measurement of student performance

Always 4. Responsibility is taken for faculty performance

Always 5. Provides both positive and corrective feedback in a collegial and professional manner

Always 6. Makes expectations clear for people being supervised

Always 7. Encourages and supports faculty in professional development in the Brewster program.

Always 8. Provides support for faculty in setting and achieving professional growth goals

Always 9. Provides informative feedback in a timely fashion

Always 10. Is readily accessible for consultation

Always 11. Ensures evaluation of new materials, methods, or program changes based on research

Mostly 12. Uses objective data and program tenets to assess program performance

Always 13. Demonstrates understanding of, and respect for, the problem solving model in professional interactions with me, my team or my department

Always 14. Takes responsibility for the quality and effective implementation of action plans

Always 15. Demonstrates expert knowledge of student problem solving strategies

Always 16. Communicates effectively in team and/or department meetings

Always 17. Performance indicates a thorough working knowledge of Brewster policy and program tenets in interactions with me.

Always 18. Makes decisions which include input from appropriate constituencies

Always 19. Demonstrates expert knowledge of the collaborative problem solving process in interactions with the team /department

Always 20. Anticipates problems and provides direction in order to avoid difficulties

Always 21. Manages time effectively; meets deadlines and is punctual

Always 22. Deals directly and openly with disagreements or differences of opinion

Always 23. Solves problems effectively

Mostly 24. Takes responsibility for assisting each member of the team or department to make the best possible contribution

Always 25. Demonstrates expert knowledge of direct teaching approaches in interactions with me

Always 26. Demonstrates expert knowledge of cooperative learning techniques in interactions with me

Always 27. Demonstrates expert knowledge of peer tutoring in interactions with me

Always 28. Demonstrates expert knowledge of class management techniques in interactions with me

Always 29. Demonstrates expert knowledge of student assessment practices (i.e. test design, authentic assessment, and CBMs) in interactions with me

Always 30. Feedback reports are of a uniformly high quality

Mostly 31. Technology is used effectively to manage implementation of evaluation

Always 32. Supports me in my professional development

Always 34. Provides me with useful feedback on how I translate professional development into practice