Vaccinatie

Veel over gezegd en veel van duidelijk. Er zijn geen duidelijke wetenschappelijk goed onderbouwde onderzoeken die laten zien dat, en vooral hoe, vaccinaties werken en specifiek; het scala aan vreemde stoffen dat er in zit.. wat het nut daarvan is. Een aantal van die stoffen zijn van dierlijke oorsprong. Met de lessen van Corona moeten overgangen tussen dieren en mensen zeker niet vesterkt worden als brug voor virussen en meer. Dat wil zeggen; geen dierlijke producten in het lichaam spuiten.

Er is wel een stevige lobby die profijt heeft van het gebruik van vaccinaties.

Die lobby gaat zover dat allerlei andere mogelijkheden weinig ruimte krijgen. Gezien de gekozen insteek van keuzevrijheid in de zorg horen er alternatieven te zijn naast vaccinatie. Daarbij is openheid van ingrediënten, productieproces en gebruikte grondstoffen, winst en het eigendom belangrijk en een normale vraag.

Blijft over de aansprakelijkheid

Wie is er aansprakelijk wanneer het mis gaat? Tot noch toe is de industrie en ook bij de uitvoerende instanties niemand te vinden die verantwoordelijk wenst te zijn. Dat dient ook te veranderen! Je bent aansprakelijk voor dat wat je maakt en voor wat je doet. Openheid in de onderhandelingen, openheid in de afspraken.

Nog onbegrijpelijker is dat er zo weinig vragen worden gesteld over de inhoud van de vaccins, over de slordige registratie van bijwerkingen, over de miljoenen claims tegen de industrie die deze vaccins maakt, over het totale gebrek aan toezicht, over het manipuleren met feiten, over het niet bieden van enig alternatief of keuzevrijheid en tenslotte; het niet verantwoordelijk willen zijn wanneer het fout gaat want; het zou eigen verantwoordelijkheid en eigen keuze zijn ..... Lees en huiver hoe dit gaat bij het Coronavirus; https://tinyurl.com/tcjcq3p

Historisch laag; babysterfte - en het opschorten van vaccinaties; Juni 2020

Juli 2020; De WHO geeft toe dat Vaccins onveilig zijn:

Mei 2020; Brits Hof bepaalt dat kinderen zonder instemming ouders gedwongen mogen worden gevaccineerd;

Modivied DNA - manipulating humans without telling it .. Unreversable changes in your DNA ... After only a experimental period of one Year? Normaly 15 years or more ar etaken. They skipped the animal trials. The don't do a test with Humans. They aren't honest with us. It's not based on science. This go's beyond all science. Say no to these draconian medicines. The governement is here to serve us not the other way. This is happening around the World,. We need to speak up and ask for alternatives and free choice. There is no good scientific reason to do this. Freedom is everything. You think I 'm extreme but that's not. This vaccine is not what you think it is. It will break us down, divide us en destroy us.

Even the governement doesn't know what is in the vaccin. They are only made responsible at side effects ... You can not fore a human being into a experiment without their concent. In the vaccin the put a digital code you can scan it with a phone. It gives the possibility to monitor you. Your body will be your cash. Your los of autonomy. When hacked what will you do then? This is not a normal vaccin!

In Africa they doing experiments on children at this moment with this vaccine; https://youtu.be/nDDHaYsRU_g ;

April 2020 LinkedIn;

Gevaccineerde mensen blijken besmettelijk;

Stanley Plotkin, godfather ..

Bijzonder zijn de discussies rondom de zogenaamde vaccinatiegraad. Die zou ongeveer bij 94% liggen... Wil dat zeggen dat u geen bescherming hebt ondanks uw vaccinatie als u nu naar een land gaat waar de vaccinatiegraad laag is? Werken de vaccinaties dan feitelijk?

Hoe ver gaat de invloed van de farmaceutische Industrie? Heel ver;

Mei 2020; Catastrofe in vaccinproeven op uitermate gezonde personen;

Juli 2020; Voor het eerst sinds vijf jaar meer vaccinaties;

De vermelding bij het bovenstaande artikel;

".. Er zijn zeventig vaccins in de maak tegen het nieuwe corona-virus. Als het goed is, volgt straks massale inenting. Obstakel: de anti-vaccineerders. Catharina Bakker belicht hun historische wortels. Krijgt de overheid hen wel zo ver om toch mee te doen? .."

Van de bovenstaande pagina;

Robert F. Kennedy provides a long list of vaccine crimes committed by Bill Gates that caused death, paralysis and many other serious injuries. In 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a “tetanus” vaccine campaign. Independent labs found a sterility formula in every vaccine tested, and WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade. Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines. A study shows that WHO’s popular DTP vaccine is killing more African children than the diseases it prevents.-GEG

Vaccines, for Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vaccination ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control of global health policy.

Gates’ obsession with vaccines seems to be fueled by a conviction to save the world with technology.

Promising his share of $450 million of $1.2 billion to eradicate polio, Gates took control of India’s National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI), which mandated up to 50 doses (Table 1) of polio vaccines through overlapping immunization programs to children before the age of five. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) epidemic that paralyzed 490,000 children beyond expected rates between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and asked Gates and his vaccine policies to leave India. NPAFP rates dropped precipitously.

The most frightening [polio] epidemics in Congo, Afghanistan, and the Philippines are all linked to vaccines.

In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) reluctantly admitted that the global explosion in polio is predominantly vaccine strain. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, Afghanistan, and the Philippines, are all linked to vaccines. In fact, by 2018, 70% of global polio cases were vaccine strain.

In 2014, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK) and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates-funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.

South African newspapers complained, ‘We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.’

In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a phase 3 trial of GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects, including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions, to 1,048 of the 5,949 children.

During Gates’ 2002 MenAfriVac campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates’ operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Approximately 50 of the 500 children vaccinated developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.” Nelson Mandela’s former senior economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless and immoral.”

In 2010, when Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO, he said “We must make this the decade of vaccines.” A month later, Gates said in a TED Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population.” And, four years later, in 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a “tetanus” vaccine campaign. Independent labs found a sterility formula in every vaccine tested. After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade. Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines.

A 2017 study (Morgenson et. al. 2017) showed that WHO’s popular DTP vaccine is killing more African children than the diseases it prevents. DTP-vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of children who had not yet received the vaccine. WHO has refused to recall the lethal vaccine, which it forces upon tens of millions of African children annually.

[Global public health officials] say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal philosophy that good health only comes in a syringe.

Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of steering WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases: clean water, hygiene, nutrition, and economic development. The Gates Foundation spends only about $650 million of its $5 billion dollar budget on these areas. They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal philosophy that good health only comes in a syringe.

In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI, and PATH, Gates funds a private pharmaceutical company that manufactures vaccines and is donating $50 million to 12 pharmaceutical companies to speed up development of a coronavirus vaccine. In his recent media appearances, Gates appears confident that the Covid-19 crisis will now give him the opportunity to force his dictatorial vaccine programs on all American children – and adults.

Read original article here…

© 4/08/2020 Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Het gaat helemaal niet over vaccins voor - of vaccins tegen; het gaat over de implementatie van een compleet controlesysteem ... in uw lichaam

Controversial vaccine studies; The influence of Bill Gates

From Want To Know;

Merck accused of stonewalling in mumps vaccine antitrust lawsuit

June 4, 2015, Reuters

https://www.reuters.com/article/health-vaccine/merck-accused-of-stonewalling-in...

Two former Merck & Co Inc scientists accusing the drugmaker of falsifying tests of its exclusive mumps vaccine said in a court filing on Monday that Merck is refusing to respond to questions about the efficacy of the vaccine. Attorneys at Constantine Cannon, who represent the scientists, asked U.S. Magistrate Judge Lynne Sitarski of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to compel Merck to respond to their discovery request, which asks the company to give the efficacy of the vaccine as a percentage. Instead of answering the question ... Merck has been consistently evasive, using “cut-and-paste” answers saying it cannot run a new clinical trial to determine the current efficacy, and providing only data from 50 years ago. The two scientists, Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, filed their whistleblower lawsuit in 2010 claiming Merck, the only company licensed by the Food and Drug Administration to sell a mumps vaccine in the United States, skewed tests of the vaccine by adding animal antibodies to blood samples. As a result, they said, Merck was able to produce test results showing that the vaccine was 95 percent effective, even though more accurate tests would have shown a lower success rate. The plaintiffs said these false results kept competitors from trying to produce their own mumps vaccines, since they were unable to match the effectiveness Merck claimed. The case is United States ex rel Krahling et al v. Merck & Co Inc, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, No. 10-4374.

Note: Why didn't this get reported widely? A search reveals no major media other than Reuters and WSJ covered this. This article in a local paper states the two whistleblowers were threatened by Merck with jail if they went public with this. It also says all students in a Syracuse University mumps outbreak had been properly vaccinated. This excellent article gives a 2019 update and reveals how the vaccines caused injury in a very high percentage of cases. For more, see concise summaries of deeply revealing news articles on vaccines from reliable major media sources.

Hospitalization Rates Higher in Kids Who Get Flu Shots

May 19, 2009, U.S. News & World Report

https://health.usnews.com/health-news/managing-your-healthcare/research...

Children who get the annual flu vaccine, especially those who have asthma, may be more likely to be hospitalized than children who don't get the shot, a new study shows. "This may not be a reflection of the vaccine but that these patients are the sickest, and their doctors insist they get a vaccination," said study author Dr. Avni Y. Joshi, a fellow at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. "Previous research has shown that the TIV does not provoke asthma attacks, but we've yet to see how effective it is in reducing hospitalization rates associated with the seasonal flu," Joshi said. "The flu shot may be safer in terms of triggering a wheezing episode, but we don't know how effective it is. We need more studies to assess the effectiveness of different kinds of vaccines. There could be something that has higher efficacy not only in preventing influenza illness, but also hospitalizations," she said. The authors looked back at 263 children aged 6 months to 18 years who had visited the Mayo Clinic between 1999 and 2006 with laboratory-confirmed influenza. Children -- including children who had asthma -- who received the annual inactivated flu vaccine were almost three times more likely to be hospitalized than those who were not inoculated.

Note: With hospitalization rates nearly three times that of children who did not get vaccinated, why are doctors downplaying this study so much? Why the focus on asthma, when the study covered all children at the Mayo Clinic confirmed to have the flu? Why isn't anyone calling for more research on these striking results? For lots of articles raising serious questions about the safety of vaccines, click here.

Adembenemende Ontwikkelingen Link

Een ander voorbeeld van wat niet helemaal goed ging is het onderstaande; Tot op heden (!) ruim 16 jaar later, lopen er procedures over en werden de gegevens van bealng, achtergehouden en mogelijk verdraaid. Het lijkt een patroon.

Xander nieuws; Europese farmaproducent: Eind 2020 beginnen we met vaccineren hele wereldbevolking Discutabel maar goed om na te denken! Mei 2020

De onderstaande pagina is belangrijk (!) gezien de bijzonder gezonde vermelding hoe er bij dieren wordt bepaald of een nieuwe vaccinatie nodig is door namelijk te kijken in het bloed naar de nog aanwezige antistoffen! Hoe komt het dat dit bij de mens, zo eenvoudig, niet of nauwelijks wordt gedaan? Het is namelijk individueel bepaald en verschillend! Ieders aanleg is anders!

De overheid die wil verplichten.. Maar wacht eens; als iemand is geïmmuniseerd, zijn vaccinatie heeft gehad, is hij toch veilig? Of de vaccinatie werkt niet of heel slecht, of de dekkingsgraad is gewoon een onzinargument. Alsof enige vorm van besmetting eerst als een onderzoeker bekijkt hoeveel mensen er gevaccineerd zijn voordat mensen worden geïnfecteerd. Hoe komt het dat wij dat verhaal bleven volgen?

About the tekst above;

Indeed; no inaccurate information please. First; we have the right to make our own choices. So; what choices do we have? First we need alternatives to make a choice possible. Secondly; clarity about the reason and effects of the various excipients that have nothing to do with evoking an immune response. Thirdly, clarity about production methods, raw materials and who earns in production, sales and which investigations have been carried out in operation, side effects and their registration and information about what. More information? https://tinyurl.com/yyyuolco

Homepage

Homepage FFRM Network

Homepage EcoVrede Nederland