"Jesus IS God!" LINKS


The Doctrine of Christ


By Yahshammah Love

By Ben Browder

The Doctrine of the Immortal Soul

IS DISPROVED BY THE BIBLE

Torah of Messiah

Adam Pastor

By Servetus the Evangelical

Verses & Words Explained

Video Commentary

The Journey of one man's understanding of the one True God

By D. J. Love, Minister, TSN, SBC

Shamar Briyth Congregations

By John Cordaro & Matthew Janzen

By Jonathan Weingarten

Arche of the Creation of God as Alpha and Omega (No. 229)

(Edition 1.0 19971217-19971217)

The arguments of modern Christianity regarding Christ have much of their origins in Greek philosophy and ancient religious practices running contrary to the Bible. Some of the biblical texts in English have been mistranslated to conceal the intent and structure of the application of the terms because they run counter to Trinitarian theology. The application of the terms Arche, Alpha and Omega, first and last, beginning and end, are explained taking into account the various texts.

Christian Churches of God

PO Box 369, WODEN ACT 2606, AUSTRALIA

Email: secretary@ccg.org

(Copyright ã 1997 Wade Cox)

This paper may be freely copied and distributed provided it is copied in total with no alterations or deletions. The publisher's name and address and the copyright notice must be included. No charge may be levied on recipients of distributed copies. Brief quotations may be embodied in critical articles and reviews without breaching copyright.

This paper is available from the World Wide Web page: http://www.logon.org and http://www.ccg.org

The phrase Alpha and Omega is written four times in the King James Version of the Scriptures. However, this phrase should only have been written three times. It was added to the Scriptures once, in order to infer that it is Yahshua Messiah Who is Alpha and Omega.

By Servetus the Evangelical

The "Firstborn"

By A. Thomas and John D. Keyser

Or Did He Exist Before His Birth?

Christadelphian Study and Help

Incarnated or Created?

Open Source Theology

Does This Show Or Prove That Yahshua Pre-exited His Birth?

THE BACKGROUND TO THE IDEA OF PRE-EXISTENCE

Ray Faircloth

Ray Faircloth

Philippians 2:5-11

By Voy Wilks

1/29/92

Bible Answer Stand

JSTOR

Biblical Unitarian

The True Meaning Of Philippians 2:5-6

By Juan Baixeras

(Philippians 2:5 -)

William M. Wachtel

PREEXISTENCE OR PREEMINENCE?

By William M. Wachtel

(Phil. 2)

Philippians 2:6 Explained

Humility of Mind

Jim Davis

Online

MOUNTAIN OF YAHWEH'S HOUSE MINISTRY

In The Spirit Of Yahushua Ha Mashiach

In Search Of The True Savior

MarYah???

What is “MarYah”?

THE MAR-YAH DECEPTION

Yahweh And Yahshua, Two Different Beings

By Paul Sides

By Voy Wilks

A Restoration Light Publication

Internet Archive

Way Back Machine (Beta)

December 5, 1998

By Brother John Raymond

Church History

The Church of Arian Catholicism

"As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be"!

Messianic, Apostolic & Arian Faith

Original Catholic Worship

Early Orthodox Christian Order

Modern Logic & Reason

[PDF] Studies/Articles

Taken from the Philippians commentary on this site.

The Bible’s supreme proof text for telling the difference between the One God and the Messiah who is not God

B'nai Shalom

Special New Teaching For YATI Members

By Rabbi Moshe Yoseph Koniuchowsky

President YATI Intl Ministries

Founder Union Of Two House Messianic Congregations

Former Co Founder Messianic Israel Alliance

Is Yahweh or Jesus Being Quoted?

OR DID HE EVER EVEN REALLY EXIST?

Written debate between Matthew Janzen and John Martignoni

COVENANTS OF PROMISE MINISTRIES

[YouTube] Debate: Who Was Jesus? God or Man? - Anthony Buzzard vs. Drew Ayers Anthony Buzzard debates Drew Ayers on Nov. 3, 2007 in Blountstown, Florida on whether God is a Trinity or simply one. [Length 132:17] Original Website: http://www.christianmonotheism.com. Anthony's Website: http://www.focusonthekingdom.org. Bible Basics:http://www.christadelphians.com.

New Testament Teaching

By Servetus the Evangelical

See All 12 Videos

Discussion on what Thomas meant when he said "My Lord and My God[!]"

Yahoo Group Messianic Apologetic - Is Yeshua the Messiah of Tanach?

Objective: To recognize Jesus Christ as the Son of God.

By Jason Dulle

Excerpt from: The Origins of Christianity and the Bible

By Ebrahim Saifuddin

What is the true relationship of The Father and The Son?

By Dan J. Love

THE BACKGROUND TO THE IDEA OF PRE-EXISTENCE

Ray Faircloth

FATHER YAHWEH's SON, YAHSHUA "Who is the image of the INVISIBLE YAHWEH, the firstBORN (BEGOTTEN) of every creature: ... "

By Paul Sides

Bryan T. Huie

By Ben Parziale

By Andrew D. Benson

For Those Who Hunger and Thirst for Righteousness

Quaker

The Nature of Pre-existence in the Hebraic Mind and the "Logos"

Following is an excerpt from: The Origin of Jesus

It is little wonder that the New Testament reminds us that the “law and prophets” of the Old Testament is the basis of our understanding of Christ (Acts 26:22; 28:23; Rom. 1:2,3; 16:25,26). Jesus himself warned that if we do not properly understand “Moses and the prophets”, we cannot understand him (Lk. 16:31; Jn. 5:46,47).

That the Law of Moses pointed forward to Christ, and the prophets prophesied of him, should be proof enough that Jesus did not exist physically before his birth. The false doctrine of the physical ‘pre-existence’ of Christ before birth makes a nonsense of the repeated promises that he would be the descendant of Eve, Abraham and David. The early preachers emphasized that Jesus was “of David’s posterity” [Gk. Spermatos- Acts 2:29-31; 13:23; Rom. 1:3; 2 Tim. 2:8]. If he were already existing up in heaven at the time of these promises, God would have been incorrect in promising these people a descendant who would be Messiah. The genealogies of Jesus, recorded in Mt. 1 and Lk. 3, show how Jesus had a pedigree which stretched back to those people to whom God had made the promises.

The promise to David concerning Christ precludes his physical existence at the time the promise was made: “I will set up your descendant [singular] after you, which shall proceed out of your body...I will be his father, and he shall be my son” (2 Sam. 7:12,14). Notice the future tense used here. Seeing that God would be Christ’s Father, it is impossible that the Son of God could have already existed at that point in time when the promise was made. That this seed “shall proceed out of your body” shows that he was to be a literal, physical descendant of David. “The Lord has sworn in truth unto David...Of the fruit of your body will I set upon your throne” (Ps. 132:11).

Solomon was the primary fulfilment of the promise, but as he was already physically in existence at the time of this promise (2 Sam. 5:14), the main fulfilment of this promise about David having a physical descendant who would be God’s son, must refer to Christ (Lk. 1:31-33). “I will raise unto David a righteous Branch” (Jer. 23:5) - i.e. Messiah.

Similar future tenses are used in other prophecies concerning Christ. “I will raise (Israel) up a Prophet like unto (Moses)” (Dt. 18:18) is quoted in Acts 3:22,23, which defines the “Prophet” as Jesus. “A virgin (Mary) shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel” (Is. 7:14). This was clearly fulfilled in Christ’s birth (Mt. 1:23). Also see: The Virgin Birth & See the subheading: 'Jewish Influence On The 'Pre-existence' Idea' from study 1.4 Why The Trinity Was Accepted In Europe

By Jane E. Marchant

Must Sign-up Or Sign-in To View

"Jesus is not being called the Creator here, as some have assumed . In the King James Version we read in John 1:3: “All things were made by him.” The word translated “by” in the KJV is the Greek word di (Strong’s #1223). Its basic meaning is “through”, as an instrument or container being used. Thus, in connection with the context, Ton Theon created all the things being spoken by means of the Logos. Many trinitarians realize that this is speaking of the Logos as the agent of God. Regarding this verse, Newman and Nida states: “This statement is literally ‘all things through him came into being.’ The Greek phrase through him indicates that the Word was the agent in creation, but at the same time the context clearly implies that God is the ultimate source of creation.” — A Translator’s Handbook on the Gospel of John, by Barclay M. Newman and Eugene A. Nida, 1980 edition, page 10."

The above quote is from the following link.

OR IS HE NOT?

Documented by Yuri A. Nesteruk

The Real Christ ...

New Testament Teaching(Part 1)

Key Principles (Part 2)

By Paul Sides

By Ivan Maddox

Atlanta, GA

By Wallace D. Wattles

For The Disciples of YAHSHUA

By Bryn Hendrickson

A Refute

By Dan J. Love, Minister

Sabbatarian Congregations of Yahweh

[PDF] Is Jesus God?

A Natural Belief in God

By John Zecca

By Anthony Buzzard

The Book of Yahweh - House of Yahweh Edition

Abilene, Texas

'The word in the Greek translated "by" is the preposition en. This is translated "because" in Matthew 26:33; Mark 14:27, but is more commonly rendered "in." It signifies "in the sphere of" a person's influence or being. The R.S.V. and Revised Version translations of the Bible render Colossians 1:16 as "for in him were all things created."'(Jesus Did Not Pre-exist)

The God of the Old Testament?

By Andrew D. Benson

Dagmatics Vol. 1 By Emil Brunner, Translated By Olive Wyon