Appeal Documents created for the 2012 Appeal

The Statement of Case and Supplement, and the Brief and Brief supplements are filed here.

This site is maintained and posted by a third party.  No content on this site may be used or copied without permission.  Unfortunately, the courts repeatedly refuse to respect the privacy of families, but the courts keep the names of the violators - the judges and court workers completely secret by using code names - presiding judge, petitioner's attorney, etc.

Content Disclaimer: It was very difficult for the father to concentrate on writing or reviewing the posted documents for the court because it's traumatic to think about the horrible abuses of children and fathers by the court.  Therefore the posted documents are written quickly, but very thoroughly and with emotion, to get it done and get to something else besides the people in court abusing children as bait for enormous profits.   Unfortunately, the supplemental documents describe ongoing abuses by the court and they repeat some information for thoroughness which adds much length.  Likely the ongoing abuses by the court (and clearly Judge Michael Mayer's actions) are intended to  Distract from the most important issues of Children's needs to have equal relationships with both sides of their family.  The thoroughness by the father includes double checking facts, evidence, quotes and dates, which multiplies the time to write documents.  Much evidence in the father's documents shows that the court appears to manufacture many of its 'facts' on the fly without having  any evidence as a basis, without reading court documents, and repeatedly the courts 'facts' are exactly the opposite of what the real evidence in the case shows.  Throughout thousands of years of history, lawyers have had the highest reputation for lying and deception and judges for injustice. 

   The father is searching for honest and honorable judges:

- who care less about defending and covering up for the court and generating ungodly profits

- and instead care the most about children's needs to have equally good relationships with both sides of their family.

- It is evident that the best interests of the court have had much higher priority than the needs of children's relationships? 

Privacy Disclaimer: To protect the privacy of the precious children, the names of the children and their parents are not revealed by the father. The appellate court has denied two formal motions asking that the appellate opinions be sealed from public and the parents' names be kep secret, for the best interest of the children.  It is clear that the court doesn't act in the best interest of children.  Instead, as an act of prejudice, the court hides only the custodian's name, by using her married last name, instead of her present (maiden) name.  In its orders and opinions, the appellate court has gone to extensive measures to keep all of the court worker names secret, including Judge Michael Mayer and Beth Harrington, to cover up the abuses of children, fathers, state laws and rules of court.  If the appellate opinions that often beat up fathers are public, then the evidence and submittals of the fathers should be public.