No audio on this site may be copied or used elsewhere. No content on this site may be copied or used without permission. All information is posted by a third party. Appellate court has refused to keep information private, except for the court's habit of keeping the names of judges and court workers completely secret. Permission was requested to record court workers that were paid thousands of dollars in fees. Most agreed willingly and some said they have nothing to hide.
Audio evidence posted below of court workers saying that Judge Michael Mayer needs to be removed from the case.
The state courts appear to require indisputable showing of prejudice to remove a judge from a case?
The U.S. standard for impartiality isn't that extreme.
Title 28 Chapter 21 §455 DISQUALIFICATION of justice, judge, magistrate
(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate [judge] of the United States shall disqualify himself
in any proceeding in which his impartiality 'might' reasonably be 'questioned'.
subpage link:
Further evidence regarding quotes and need to remove Judge Michael Mayer