This site is maintained and posted by a third party. No content on this site may be used or copied without permission. Unfortunately, the courts repeatedly refuse to respect the privacy of families, but the courts keep the names of the violators - the judges and court workers completely secret by using code names - presiding judge, petitioner's attorney, etc.
Notice: The purpose of all these pages has always been to bring these people to the knowledge of the truth - that those who claim to be Christians - J. Mayer and others - cannot receive salvation without true repentance and godly sorrow (2 Cor 7:10) for their actions in this case - which includes the visible fruits of reconciliation (Matt 5:23-24, Matt 3:7-8). The goal, if it isn't impossible for them to repent (Heb 6:4-6, Heb 10:26-27), is that these people repent and reconcile for their violations in using children in their abuses of power to willingly violate human rights, constitutional protections, natural liberties and Christ's commands and design. (These verses of God's Word are quoted at the page bottom)
As far as is known, there is no state law in Minnesota that mandates swearing or notarizing a motion or affidavit. And to uphold the religious freedom of the Constitution no such law should exist. "All you need to say is simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything beyond this comes from the evil one." Matt 5:34. Until May 2012, there was no rule of court that required either for an affidavit. Neither swearing nor notarizing is required by the Rules of Court for a motion, but still Judge Mayer demands these or he denies all justice to fathers.
Until the legislature makes such laws, the court must not mandate such serious requirements or deny justice based only on these conditions which are not required by law, but Judge Michael Mayer has been inventing and mandating secretly with his vague and overgeneralizing and false 'improper motion' excuse for years and failing to give these reasons until late 2012. Judge Mayer knows that if he defined his reasons each time, he could be held accountable for his abuses. So instead he abuses fathers and his power using vague statements while ignoring the constitution and state law. The court is out of control making up serious requirements that don't exist in law and violate the constitution.
"All you need to say is simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything beyond this comes from the evil one." Matt 5:34.
Judge Mayer often reads the motion or summarizes it in the hearing. Then Judge Michael Mayer can ask a simple question in the hearings that he so abusively demands (so he/his clerk Richard Crabb doesn't have to bother themselves to read the father's affidavit evidence): Is this your motion? Is this your affidavit? Is this your signature on this document? Is this factual? And with a simple Yes or No answer from the father, all is solved. But instead, Judge Michael Mayer denies requests, denies holding hearings, denies access to hearings, cuts off the father completely before the father even starts the motion argument and denies whatever he wants by demanding the father violate God's commands before Judge Mayer allows any of the above.
Swearing - Examples of the custodian committing perjury, lying under oath, are presented on this site, and these examples are situations where Judge Michael Mayer knew and acknowledged that the custodian was lying under oath. Yet Judge Michael Mayer did nothing about the custodian's perjury, except rewarding her even more. Judge Michael Mayer also did nothing when the father asked Judge Mayer about the ethic violations of lawyer Deanne Dulas who was violating ethical standards by placing false statements in people's mouths in the child custody trial, knowingly saying you said this, when Deanne knew she was lying and twisting statements of what others said. Judge Mayer just called for an early break and ignored the lies and violations of ethics by women in court. The new May 2012 Rules of Court lawyer definition for truthful affidavit is that it "contains facts" - like water contains oxygen, but don't try breathing water (unless of course you evolved from a fish). Lawyers don't swear in court before talking or writing their documents. Lawyers lie endlessly in court (and become judges) and the judges make decisions based on what lawyers say. These unlawful mandates all seem like exercises in futility creating costs and efforts with no real equitable value. How many times in the last decade has a MN court charged a woman with perjury in child custody court? Since he treats women and lawyers completely unequally versus fathers, what good are Judge Mayer's demands for which there is no state law requirement - while he clearly ignores lies under oath that Judge Mayer even admitted: a. the custodian claimed she didn't start a single argument in 13 years of the couple together; b. the custodian repeatedly lied under oath that she was suffering financially [with more than $1,000,000 in assets + $130,000 per year working 33 hours per week + $22,000 per year in tax-free support + $16,000 in tax benefits] while the custodian and Judge Mayer made the father into a pauper and continued court orders and illegal interest to push the father into bankruptcy. And the custodian is suffering?? during grand theft and stealing children?? If the custodian or her father Roger or Judge Michael Mayer had a conscience (search the site for narcissistic or psychopathic), they would have great psychological suffering for continuing this terrorism against the father and the children. c. the custodian lied about her annual job income for years (see details toward the end of this page- "more regarding the custodian's obvious perjury to Judge Michael Mayer") Dr. Jayne Major 2.5 minute video link A conscience? sociopath/psychopath
Notarizing - Judge Mayer has never questioned the validity of the father's signature. If he ever did, he could ask the simple question in the hearing and get a yes or no answer. Judge Mayer knows that the father's writings are very much their own signature and very easy to see. No MN state law is known to exist that requires a notary for motions or affidavits. There isn't even a rule of court that requires a notary or swearing for a motion, but Judge Mayer revealed in late 2012 his years long secret demand for both, after refusing for years to define or instruct as to what is considered 'improper motion' in his mind. Again, if he defined his unlawful requirements, then he could be held accountable to the law. But vague undefinable phrases like 'improper motion' help to maintain Judge Michael Mayer's UNACCOUNTABILITY and DISHONOR. In the Dec 2011 hearing, Judge Mayer repeatedly denied the reality that he speaks in vague and overgeneralized statements when talking about the father and about the law, and lacks specific evidence to back up his vague allegations. The use of notaries has been needlessly exploded and wastes a lot of time for all parties and wastes employee time in banks for every little paper which doesn't need notary. The American Society of Notaries lists “contracts, deeds, agreements and powers of attorney” as examples of frequently notarized documents. A motion or affidavit isn't a contract, deed or agreement. The court is abusing notaries, citizens and its power. It is a waste. Notaries should be charging for these services, and they do charge if you don't have a bank account with them, or they send you to a lawyer for a high notary fee.
Regardless of what he thinks, confirmation instructor Judge Michael Mayer doesn't have authority above God's commands. And the United States Constitution protects religious freedom and the government has no right to order a Christian to violate God's commands, especially not in order to obtain the God given inalienable rights of parenting. Yet when reminded of God's commands, Judge Mayer has continued to thumb his nose at God's commands and Judge Mayer demands that Judge Michael Mayer must be obeyed above and before God and in violation of God's commands. God is very clear
- "You shall have no other gods before me." Ex 20:3
- "We must obey God rather than men." Act 5:29
- "Do not swear ... All you need to say is simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything beyond this comes from the evil one." Mt 5:34
- "Above all ... do not swear ... or you will be condemned." James 5:12
- Those who are followers of Christ must resolve "in the church!" the disputes between believers "the things of this life!" (1 Cor 6, Matt 18:17, James 2). Thumbing his nose at the authority and the almighty power of God for resolving disputes, Judge Mayer made an order prior to the decree which banned talking to leaders in the church. Church leaders are competition to the greedy court workers who greatly enrich themselves by destroying families and eliminating fathers for profits.
Judge Michael Mayer, the religious confirmation instructor in his very liberal church has repeatedly commanded the father since 2010 to violate God's commands (without a state law requirement, J. Mayer demands notarized swearing on motions without an affidavit - he deceives) before any of the father's motions will be heard regarding the custodian violating his court orders by blocking parenting access by phone and computer or motions for visits or before Judge Michael Mayer will stop breaking the state law mandate which requires a dispute resolution method (outside of court). Yet any 30 day expedited process motion regarding money or financial relief for the pauperis father has been diverted and delayed 9 months through the courts, then "heard" illegally in general court by Judge Mayer and trampled under foot. In fact, this confirmation instructor cut off the father before the father even made his motions in the Dec. 2010 "hearing" because Judge Mayer didn't want to obey court procedures which are mandated by state law. And then the appeal/decision was delayed another year by obstruction of justice by Judge Michael Mayer, the church confirmation instructor.
Judge Mayer makes it clear in the decree and by his actions that he expects fathers to have "flexible and accommodating" religion in order to get access to their children (like his church body who are flexible enough to encourage homosexuality in the church pulpits). When the leaders of the very large church body turn their backs on God, why should the members like Judge Mayer do any differently in their churches and in their homes? People have an ungodly right to reject God and be unbelievers, but they have no right to order someone outside of their church to violate God's commands in order to be 'heard' in court. Except with an insider connection, Judge Mayer rarely "really hears" what many fathers say in his court hearings if the 'hearing' isn't in agreement with what the woman wants (and financial profiting court workers). Judge Mayer rules in one-sided favoritism of the greatest intensity.
Judge Mayer's mode of operation is Cash before kids. Cash before God. Give us another $50,000 or $100,000 in ransom and extortion and then we'll 'hear' about access to kids. Judge Michael Mayer operates like a professional kidnapping.
It was originally custody evaluator Dr. James Gilbertson who cleverly communicated in writing that he believes that religion should be "flexible and accommodating." A Bible-based church who believes all of God's Word and is similarly conservative as traditional Catholic doesn't meet Dr. Gilbertson's mindset of "flexible and accommodating" religion. Court worker Dr. Brian Powers would also agree. Judge Mayer's accomplice custody evaluator fraudulent Beth Harrington kept her religious affiliation secret.
Yet Dr. Gilbertson doesn't appear to use money or religion as a factor of child custody. Dr. Gilbertson warned that sole custody would increase the parental alienation. Judge Michael Mayer trampled Dr. Gilbertson and Dr. Reitman's protocols, and their warnings under foot by ordering sole custody. Then Judge Mayer boldly and falsely boasted that he doesn't even step on the professional's toes or interfere with their protocols. And then Judge Mayer trampled under foot the protocol recommendations of short-term therapist Dr. Brian Powers who wanted father-child therapy, but under favoritism pressure "made an agreement with her" to prevent father-child therapy and to deny the father access to medical and school records as a condition for her bringing the children again, which of course the custodian stopped doing once she, the deceiver, gained what she wanted.
The rich thief and deceiver custodian used slander (which is false allegations) to exploit Dr. Powers and the father and to force an agreement of favoritism to prevent parent-child therapy. All of this was also desired by her father/thief Roger, a millionaire former tax collector.
God's commands and eternal warnings aren't very "flexible and accommodating"?
"from the evil one" "condemned" "will not inherit the kingdom of God" aren't very flexible and accommodating?
-- regarding taking unfair advantage of (exploiting) believers in court:
James 2:1 "Don’t show favoritism"
James 2:6-7 "Is it not the rich who are exploiting you? Are they not the ones who are dragging you into court? Are they not the ones who are slandering the noble name of him to whom you belong?" (slandering Christ's name by taking advantage of believers in court)
James 5:12 "Above all ... do not swear ... or you will be condemned."
Matt 18:17 If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, treat him as you would a pagan or a tax collector.
God's commands in exclamations! not flexible and accommodating.
1 Cor 6:1-10 Resolve disputes "the things of this life!" "in the church!" not "in front of unbelievers!" [a shame and slandering and public disgrace of Christ's name to force another believer to use court instead of church] "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God."
--- regarding perseverance and who are really Jesus' disciples:
Heb 10:29-30 How much more severely do you think a man deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God under foot. ... For we know Him who said, “It is mine to avenge; I will repay." ... It is a dreadful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.
Heb 10:35-36 So do not throw away your confidence; it will be richly rewarded. You need to persevere so that when you have done the will of God, you will receive what he has promised.
Heb 10:38 "And if he shrinks back, I will not be pleased with him.” But we are not of those who shrink back and are destroyed, but of those who believe and are saved.
John 8:31-32 If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.
And the last chapter of God's Word:
Rev 22:11 Let him who does wrong continue to do wrong; let him who is vile continue to be vile (shocking and morally wrong); let him who does right continue to do right.
Is. 5:20 Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness
Rom 8:11 as it is written, "God gave them a spirit of stupor, eyes so that they could not see and ears so that they could not hear, to this very day.”"
Heb. 6:4-6 It is impossible for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, 5 who have tasted the goodness of the Word of God and the powers of the coming age, 6 if they fall away, to be brought back to repentance, because to their loss they are crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting Him to public disgrace.
This is one of the most concerning passages the father has read. Before reading this passage in Dec 2012, the father thought that Judge Michael Mayer and Judge Edward Lynch and the millions of women who are exploiting fathers and children in public courts and publicly disgracing God had a chance to be brought to repentance. This passage is not encouraging. This passage makes it very clear why "flexible and accommodating religion" is most dangerous.
Being flexible and accommodating to put your religious belief system on the ledge between what God commands and what ungodly people practice is most dangerous because the fall in the direction of ungodly is infinite.
God's love is of greatest intensity. God could have commanded that we must do certain actions to inherit His kingdom. God could have commanded that we must pray 8 times a day or give 25% of our income to the church to inherit heaven. And many would do those if those were some of the conditions. Or God could have expected us to obey his commandments and have no sin. But God didn't.
In God's greatest love, He asked us to believe His commands, acknowledge all sins against His commands, repent when we sin, and believe that Jesus' death and resurrection covers for our sins.
1 John 1:8 If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us.
God asked us simply to continually acknowledge sins and truly repent. Those are simple conditions, but many churches fail to even acknowledge sins against God's commands when that's many times easier than obeying all His commands. Instead they claim that what God prohibits isn't sin. And that eliminates the need to repent and believe which are necessary for salvation.
God made it so easy to gain salvation, but many churches refuse to do the simple and believe all His commands.
Child custody courts are full of workers and many women who are thieves, greedy. slanderers and extortioners and exploit (take unfair advantage of) fathers and children. Those who fail to acknowledge and truly repent (which includes retribution and change) are risking the loss of the inheritance of God's kingdom.
Slander is something that is not true. If you can prove that something on this site isn't true, send a message with the proof and the statement will be corrected.
More about the custodian's obvious perjury to Judge Michael Mayer
... c. the custodian lied about her annual job income for years to Judge Mayer, which in 2008 alone was $21,600 more than she reported under oath (2009-10-07 attached). Based on the county attorney's income date, the custodian appears to have lied to the IRS in 2007 or submitted a 2007 tax form with false income data to Judge Mayer to be used for the 2009 decree. The last tax form received by the father was the 2006 taxes (in 1/21/2008 discovery). Judge Mayer denied repeated motions for the custodian to provide her 2007, 2008 and 2009 tax forms and health care reimbursements to the father. Judge Mayer didn't want the custodian to be caught lying to the IRS again (and to him)? The father had provided Judge Mayer with proof in 2008 that the custodian had lied on her 2006 IRS tax return regarding 2006 property taxes that she didn't pay and forced the father to pay. Judge Michael Mayer did nothing except reward the custodian enormously for her outrageous and histrionic perjury to him and to the IRS. The custodian took 100% of child exemptions and tax benefits in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 during which support payments were taken in full. Judge Mayer, with illegal actions and false and deceptive findings in his Oct 2009 order, he doubled the custodian's tax benefits. Regarding the millionaire custodian "suffering financially," Judge Mayer angrily demanded in 2008, 'those children need to be in a house' {which was later paid 100% with winnings taken from the father by Mayer} because the custodian was intentionally living in a {nice} townhouse {with a pool} {near her millionaire father Roger} to deceive and anger Judge Mayer (successfully), when she could already easily afford to live in a luxurious house. And the obvious evidence of perjury listed on this page was only the top 1 inch of the custodian's mountain of lies, especially regarding the children and her own behaviors and desires.
With the endless and very obvious perjuries in sworn notarized written and verbal statements from women flooding the child custody courts, with enormous rewards to women instead of negative consequences, Judge Mayer's unlawful mandates denying all the father's 2010, 2011, 2012 motions regarding children's needs, until God's commands are violated by the father regarding sworn statements from a Christian, all seem like exercises in futility - creating costs and efforts with no real equitable value.
1. Judge Mayer hasn't provided evidence that the father's evidence isn't factual.
2. Judge Mayer's has shown in his 2013-01-02 letter (on site) that he doesn't want over 40 selected documents of evidence against him (and recordings) in the record that were illegally disposed before the case went to the appellate court in 2012, most of which didn't require sworn statement or in fact had sworn notarized statements in 2009 and prior.
3. Judge Mayer hasn't provided evidence that backs up Judge Mayer false findings that he plants in his orders
4. Judge Mayer and the magistrates have ignored almost every motion for review/reconsideration that prove that many of Judge Mayer's findings are false, and haven't responded with specific evidence.
5. Chief Judge Edward Lynch and the appellate court have just believed whatever false plantings without backing evidence that the court plants in the record, and then merely duplicating the lower court's lies (compounding lies) for their orders and opinions.
So what really is Judge Mayer's agenda?
Certainly facts backed up with evidence are a million times more important and critical than a sworn notarized signature.
Take another look at the outrageous lies and malicious agendas of the custodian and Judge Michael Mayer:
The custodian's 2009-11-10 motion against the father (attached)
" 2. ... for the orders to support and pay sanctions {$28,000 of her attorney fees which her millionaire father Roger paid} has caused the Petitioner and the children to suffer. Mr. [father] needs to be forced to follow the orders immediately. I believe jail time will be necessary for Mr. [father]."
The custodian filed this 2009-11-10 motion at the same time the government was taking 100% of the father's unemployment income for 3 months! and illegally took $2097 in excess of 120% court orders + more than $1000 in illegal interest. Instead of the necessary action of prosecuting the custodian (and Judge Mayer) for perjury (and terrorism), the court (Judge Mayer?) apparently granted her wish with a secret bench warrant against the father to "hold without bail or bond" that appears in the court record as quashed on 2010-07-26 by Judge K. Messerich (attached) (8 months after the custodian's jail motion and two November police searches), and after the support division (Krista Sorensen) finally admitted in 2010-07-09 (attached) after 9 months delay of by Krista, that the father "have been paying in full for at least 12 months" {actually 120%+ of the court order by force since April 2007}. No one in the court acknowledged the full payments or the support division letter in court orders. But instead, the court duplicated Judge Mayer's lies alleging not full payments, which were duplicated by magistrates and the chief Judge Edward Lynch who all had the letter, and all the way up to and inside the 2011 appellate court opinion. The support division actually took full payments in force from income sources since April 2007 and $2097 in forced illegal 'overpayments' + more than $1000 in illegal interest that they refused to refund.
Overpaying support to a millionaire custodian at the same time as taking 100% of father's unemployment income
is grounds for an arrest warrant against a father to "hold without bail or bond"
in Judge Michael Mayer's World and in his career police prosecutor mindset Bias and Prejudice.
Pre-judging without evidence.
Rev 3:19 As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten. Therefore be zealous and repent.
2 Cor 7:10 For godly sorrow produces repentance leading to salvation, not to be regretted; but the sorrow of the world produces death.
John 3:36 He who believes in the Son has everlasting life; and he who does not believe the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him.”
Matthew 5:23-24 Therefore if you bring your gift to the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, 24 leave your gift there before the altar, and go your way. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift.
Matt 3:7-8 But when he saw many of the Pharisees {lawyers} and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, “Brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 8 Therefore bear fruits worthy of repentance
Heb 6:4-6 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 if they fall away, to renew them again to repentance, since they crucify again for themselves the Son of God, and put Him to an open shame.
Heb 10:26-27 For if we sin willfully after we have received the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, 27 but a certain fearful expectation of judgment, and fiery indignation which will devour the adversaries
--
Matt 22:14 For many are called, but few are chosen.
Matt 7:21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven.
Luke 6:46 “But why do you call Me ‘Lord, Lord,’ and not do the things which I say?
John 15:14 You are My friends if you do whatever I command you.
John 8:31-32 Then Jesus said to those Jews who believed Him, “If you abide in My word, you are My disciples indeed. And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”