This site is maintained and posted by a third person. No content on this site may be copied without permission.
Exhibit F2 audios (end of page) - Brainwashing - Pay, THEN you can see us. Technically not my father. Lies about support is argument to change birth names
The tragedy in this family shows very clearly why the court is abusing it's power and dictatorship control and should
- Never lock any judge into a case for more than 1 year, and make it mandatory to get mutual agreement to keep a judge another year. And the same needs to be mandatory for psychologists and mediators, so they don't abuse their power.
As you can see, the children clearly communicate in words of alienation that the custodian has used to brainwash them.
Sole physical custody is the perfect environment for parental alienation. Judge Michael Mayer and Beth Harrington knew very well, and also others who are familiar with this case, that since 2005, the custodian has been repeatedly coaching the children with "reasons" to cut off their father. And Dr. Reitman warned the court in writing repeatedly in 2006 and 2007 and Beth Harrington in a consultation, but they ignored the evidence and repeatedly chose to reward the custodian with greatest intensity instead, and give her everything she needed to cut off the father and ensure the greatest intensity of parental alienation.
One son stated on 9/22/2006, "So Mom will have more reasons for us to have less time with you, or if not, none."
Of course, it's severe alienation for the custodian to coach the children with reasons to cut off their father. The 9/22/2006 audio was among numerous audio exhibits filed in court on 9/28/2007 by the father pro se that were evidence of parental alienation by the custodian. Attorney John Burns failed to submit the CD exhibits in May 2007 - it was too soon for resolution (too much more money for court workers to steal),and Judge Mayer repeatedly broke the law by denying evidentiary hearings, when taking actions to severely restrict parenting time.
Dr. Reitman warned the court about the parental alienation by the custodian several times in writing in 2006 (emails) and 2007 (Addendum), and in a 2007 phone consultation between Dr. Reitman and Beth Harrington, who had Dr. Reitman's written warnings. But both of them ignored Dr. Reitman's warnings. Beth Harrington was appointed to do exactly as Judge Mayer wants.
So Judge Mayer and his accomplice Beth Harrington instead rewarded the custodian greatly with continued sole physical custody and added the use of detention centers to alienate the children to the greatest intensity.
Of course, it's very apparent that it is terrible parental alienation to accuse the father of not paying support. But this isn't parental alienation to Judge Michael Mayer or Beth Harrington. The actions are especially wicked because the government was taking payments in full and $2097 illegally above the court order and over $760 in illegal interest and the father had proof of full payments in a letter from the support division after they (Krista Sorensen) delayed for months.
Of course, it is terrible parental alienation to tell children that they technically or legally don't have a father. But this is parental alienation that Judge Michael Mayer supports with all his might and repeatedly denied motions to do anything related to the children's needs, parental alienation, reversal of legal custody and motions for Children's Rights. Judge Mayer would only respond to motions about money, money, money.
It is very clear that the demands are for MORE CASH, THEN KIDS (words yes, actions no) - like a professional kidnapping sponsored by Judge Michael Mayer and his accomplices fraudulent evaluator Beth Harrington and chief Judge Edward Lynch.
One son stated: "pay your child support bills, THEN you can see us" - the children know exactly what the custodian's conditions are "cash for kids", but she was getting the cash payments in full and not sharing the kids. When the ransom is paid, the custodian reverses.
- the custodian apparently was also telling the kids that the father was fired, which isn't true. Fired people don't get unemployment. But the kids believe whatever the custodian tells them in her brainwashing.
By repeatedly lying to police, the custodian's goal was to destroy the father's security clearance (which she did), but she also wanted him fired from his Minnesota job that he obtained with a top secret clearance. She made that request specifically in the previous state after filing for divorce. And does anyone wonder why the words sociopathic/psychopathic are used to describe these many behaviors of the custodian and her friend Judge Michael Mayer?
One son stated: "One argument that Mom made is that you weren't sending child support, and if I didn't change my name that I was cutting her off"
{'Mom' was telling him the complete OPPOSITE of reality - because the father was paying in full, and it was the father who was having his last thread CUT OFF, and changing the children's birthname was the last thread to cutting off the father legally. The son said that he didn't want to change his name, but he believed what the custodian told him, and she had sole dictatorship control, so he had to take her side, or else. Like a cult kidnapping. Don't mess with me!, is what the custodian warned the father's sister. The recording is on the blocking calls page}
The custodian takes pleasure in saying - Don't mess with me, or I'll call the police, the Eagan police who she has endless evidence that they are strong supporters and encouragers of parental alienating women, and take pleasure in beating down fathers. And Judge Michael Mayer was the former Eagan police prosecutor and discussed this case with the Chief of Police. So the Eagan Police have their marching orders.
It is very clear what the custodian's agenda was by getting sole legal custody from Judge Michael Mayer. She made sure the children believed that their father was 'technically' (legally) not their father. These are adult concepts, not kids.
One son stated: "Technically you're really actually not my father ... You don't deserve respect."
- Because the children have been brainwashed to believe the custodian is telling the truth and that the father isn't, the children believe what the custodian says without questioning and repeatedly disbelieve what the father says. This is very clear in this evidence.
Even if the payments had not been in full, that's not a reason to say pay, then you can see us, and it's certainly not a reason to change children's birth names. But the children believed these lying reasons from the custodian who very obviously continues to harm the children's minds, a terrible kind of child abuse. Dr. Jane Major video - child abuse - listen to first 3 min+
It isn't a good idea for a severely alienating woman with these mental behaviors of hysterical compulsive lying to have passports of the children? The father has good intuition - as even Judge Mayer's accomplice Beth Harrington was forced to reluctantly admit under testimony when presented with evidence of the father's intuition regarding exchanges and parenting.
And Judge Mayer and Beth Harrington knew very well that this brainwashing parental alienation by the custodian and her parents was serious. Dr. Reitman warned him repeatedly in 2006-2007, but Judge Mayer had a different agenda. Judge Mayer states the serious alienation by the custodian and then plants false information as if it doesn't mean anything. And he couldn't tell it was intentional with his hands over his eyes and ears?
The Feb. 2009 decree item 39, p. 6 stated, "(custodian) has contributed to the strained relationship between [father] and the children by talking about the divorce, blaming [father] for financial difficulties impacting the children."
Judge Mayer knew that the millionaire custodian was seriously alienating the father and lying to the children about suffering financially and blaming the father, and then rewarded the custodian enormously with total control of the children, enough assets to buy a house with cash and no mortgage, grand theft of other assets and property and full freedom and support to alienate the children further under sole physical custody.
The Feb. 2009 decree item 39, p. 6 continued, "and taking the children to exchange sites and waiting for [father] to show up even though he had e-mailed or called indicating he could not make the visitation. She would then tell the children "I guess your Dad isn't going to show up." This type of conduct, whether intentional or not, served to alienation the children from [father].
Judge Mayer knew VERY WELL from testimony - that this "Dad isn't going to show up" WAS intentional, he knew that it happened for 7 MONTHS OF WEDNESDAYS at a police station to alienate even further and the only reason the father couldn't make it was because Judge Mayer ordered that a 'family member' (not friends who were local and willing) to drive hours for Wednesday evening "visitation" as the wicked judges refer to parenting time. This was one of Judge Mayer's best cover-up and deceptions, covering up severe parental alienation that he knew very well. The custodian's father admitted doing the same thing in testimony on the Wednesdays that he took the kids to the police station to wait for their father, who they knew didn't have a relative available. See the evidence from the court file - 2009-02-11 decree 7 months of intentional alienation.
As Judge Mayer heard in the trial testimony, this went on every Wednesday for 7 months in complete secrecy. It's unbelievable that the children didn't ever say anything about going to the police station every Wednesday evening. They must have been told to not say anything. The custodian and her father probably said to the children, don't tell him (father) because _______ or else he will _________ (fill in various father-alienating options for the blanks).
The custodian had lied to Judge Mayer saying she needed sole legal custody to get passports. That is a lie because there is a section on the application form that asks for the reason why the other parent didn't sign the passport application. Judge Mayer enormously rewarded the custodian's enormous lies by gift-wrapping sole legal custody for her.
At the first MN hearing, Judge Mayer warned against using kids as pawns, but that's exactly what Judge Mayer and the custodian knew that both of them were doing. Kids for Cash. Pawns for Profit. I pray that they reverse their actions completely today, so that on their last day on earth, I pray that they don't achieve Judge Mayer's warning - receiving "fury that you will not overcome."
You see, the custodian didn't have a good reason for getting sole legal custody. As the phrase goes, "possession is 9/10 of the law". Or that with possession one can more easily ignore the law. And in child custody court, sole physical possession (custody) often gives 99/100 of the control to the sole custodian. And Judge Michael Mayer isn't that stupid to not know the possession reality- very, very well?
The #1 reason and benefit for getting sole legal custody is parental alienation - to change the children's birthnames to her last name, which she did very quickly after getting sole legal custody gift-wrapped from her dear Judge Michael Mayer.
The #1 reason and benefit for getting sole legal custody is parental alienation - to tell children that technically or legally they don't have a father.
The #1 reason and benefit for getting sole legal custody is parental alienation - to cut off the father from access to school report cards, medical records, church records.
The secondary reason and benefit for getting sole legal custody is theft and fraud - the custodian submitted fraudulent medical costs and didn't include insurance receipts which are mandatory per the form she signed under oath.
Another possible reason and benefit for getting sole legal custody is parental alienation - kidnapping out of the country.
You see, the custodian received sole custody in an illegal hearing, which Judge Michael Mayer had been previously notified was illegal because there was no 3rd party service of the motion and documents (until after the hearing). The hearing was also illegal, as Judge Mayer was aware, because it was mandatory to attempt ADR or settlement and certify to the court regarding these attempts. All of those steps were skipped. Judge Mayer decreed that he thought differently and continued to deny motions for a parenting consultant which decision making powers.
First the custodian argued in April 2009 to Judge Mayer that she needed sole legal custody to get passports for the oldest child to go on a choir tour, which didn't happen in June 2010, because he quit the choir in 2009.
The custodian continued to make the father pay for the expensive choir fees and day care fees, even in years after neither were used. Judge Mayer was well aware of these abuses, but has denied removal of the fees and only rewarded the custodian more for her lies and abuses.
Then the custodian argued in 2010 to Judge Mayer, that she needed sole legal custody in order to get passports for a family vacation, and so she got sole custody gift-wrapped by Judge Michael Mayer, when sole legal isn't even needed to get passports. A son mentioned a possible youth trip (probably church group) to Russia in summer 2011, that might be considered a family vacation, as he said, if the custodian went as a church youth leader.
A trip for 4 to Russia while they were suffering financially? and the custodian brainwashing the children that the father should be cut off, not technically their father, and his family name removed, all of these because of lies about not paying support, when the father was paying support in full, $2097 above court order, charging more than $760 in illegal interest and taking 100% of his unemployment income after taxes for 3 months, leaving the father with not one penny of income. And do you wonder why the words malicious, narcissistic/borderline and sociopathic/psychopathic exist on this site - the custodian, her father and Judge Mayer resemble such behavior?
You've heard the evidence, you know their actions. Read the documents at the link describing sociopathic/psychopathic and narcissistic/borderline, all of which are compulsive liars. psych behaviors, documents. You decide if the custodian, her father Roger and Judge Michael Mayer's actions and abuses of power fit these behaviors - not for a label, but so that people will realize these problems and encourage them to seek therapy on their own for themselves.
There was no mention again of any trip outside the U.S. There was no indication that any trip was taken outside the U.S. The passport excuse was a big deception game to get sole legal and change their birthnames and cut off legal access - PURE PARENTAL ALIENATION IS THE #1 REASON AND BENEFIT OF SOLE LEGAL CUSTODY. Judge Mayer was taken for a fool many times over. Or Judge Mayer is just taking pleasure in the beat down fathers "game."