"Kids for Cash Minnesota" court corruption ring enflaming Parental Alienation for Profits - "Contaminated" Judge Michael J. Mayer, Beth P. Harrington, DeAnne L. Dulas, Eagan police, chief Judge Edward Lynch, Brent Baumler, Mayer's clerk Richard Crabb
2007-06-05 court appointed expert says 'You're being set up ... by Contaminated Judge Mayer ... Abuse of Power ... Mayer's evaluator Harrington will do exactly as he wants.' audio>
2007-06-05 being setup by Contaminated Judge, Abuse of Power, Harrington will do exactly as he wants - expert appointed by Judge Michael Mayer, talking about Judge Mayer and Beth Harrington.mp3Contaminated Judge Michael Mayer has refused annual requests to remove himself from this case for over 15 years since 2006. He keeps total control of the case in order to cover up his human rights crimes and chief judges cover up too. Contaminated Judge Michael Mayer also uses his former employer the Eagan Police to commit his human rights crimes with immunity. The evil divorce industry is over $50 Billion a year for lawyers alone.
Please link to this site. No content on this site may be used or copied without permission.
This site is maintained and posted by a third party. No content on this site may be used or copied without permission. Unfortunately, the courts repeatedly refuse to respect the privacy of families, but the courts keep the names of the violators - the judges and court workers completely secret by using code names - presiding judge, petitioner's attorney, etc.
Notice: The purpose of all these pages has always been to bring people to the knowledge of the truth - that those who claim to be Christians - J. Mayer and others - cannot receive salvation without true repentance and godly sorrow (2 Cor 7:10) for their actions in this case. True sorrow requires the visible fruits of reconciliation (Matt 5:23-24, Matt 3:7-8). The goal, if it isn't impossible for them to repent (Heb 6:4-6, Heb 10:26-27), is that these people repent and reconcile for their violations in abusing children in their abuses of power to willingly violate human rights, constitutional protections, natural liberties and Christ's commands and design. (These verses of God's Word are quoted at the page bottom). By their fruits you will know - Judge Michael Mayer, his evaluator Beth Harrington, divorce lawyer Deanne Dulas, the custodian and the custodian's father lawyer Roger are on the path to eternal punishment by God the Almighty Judge. Lawyers know that their chance of going to heaven is probably ten in a billion, but some practice as fake Christians anyway while demolishing families for very high profits.
To the custodian and all government employees, the father asks for forgiveness of the debts charged against him, even when unemployed.
The Lord Jesus Christ is very firm that no one will receive forgiveness/salvation who refuses to forgive and reconcile - with a believer in a Bible believing church. Matthew 6:14-15 (Christ's Sermon on the Mount) 14 “For if you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. 15 But if you do not forgive men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.
Any Petitioner, Judge, government employee who uses a court order and refuses Biblical mediation in a Bible believing church - or anyone who refuses to forgive and reconcile with a believer - will not receive forgiveness/salvation.
SERMON link - You Must Forgive. Unforgiving will not be saved. www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=101313196452
PROFESSIONAL films
CHILD TRAFFICKING- AMERICAN STYLE Jan 2015
How KidsforCash exists https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7B4EJcc8J8E
watch especially 0-1:00, 2:45 to 4:10 (2.5 minutes) plus 5:20 to 10:00
source www.divorcecorp.com
---
Excellent short summary video (1.5 minutes) Judiciary Committee Rep. Minnie Gonzalez (17 years)
warning to Connecticut Task Force - Jan. 2014:
It's all about money: Not in the Best Interest of Children
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-KYfFaR4z0&index=28&list=PLzRyuV_XOzdo8jGJruNt84AqKzWljefGO
“It's not about the best interest of kids” "It's about money"
"milking the people down to the end" "lose money, home, kids"
---
video (12 minutes) Divorce Corp (2014) professional film excerpts – five 2 minute videos
– courts using children to enrich court workers - playlist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZTOT6DKfZ8&index=1&list=PLwRQEFL0Kbboei7Gdlx5RvlUlFwlVvrNT
Film trailer (commercial) 2 min:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZTOT6DKfZ8
---
Some of the latest postings are listed at 1a. Latest postings
Due to threats from the court (in order to keep their abuses of fathers and children secret), this information was not accessible to the public until 2012. And the more personal information in sections numbered 10 and 13-17 was not public until after a very abusive and false letter by Judge Michael Mayer in late November 2013 - in which he denies all justice and continues to knowingly support child abuse by the custodian and her parents (youtube postings in 2013 of evidence submitted to court in previous years), in order to cover up for himself and the court and the custodian and her father who is a retired lawyer.
This site is in a draft version. It will be refined and edited and made nicer. In it's present state, it is for the court to know that evidence should not be ignored or disposed, as Judge Michael Mayer and chief Judge Edward Lynch are experts at doing.
The names of the father and mother and children aren't listed on this website, and their names and the case number have been replaced in the documents, in order to protect the privacy for the children. The court determines whether they reveal the private family names of the parents and continue 'to place children in the middle' while they 'talk a good game' and 'manage the greatest intensity of emotional and financial cost."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This site provides evidence of court workers planting lies, breaking laws, obstructing justice, covering up, tampering, and fraud, especially by Judge Michael J. Mayer, and also by fraudulent evaluator Beth P. Harrington (Beth Painter Harrington) and the custodian's lawyer Deanne Lynn Dulas. The site includes the court expert's warnings about one-sided secretive children's counselor Brent Baumler "participating in alienating the children" from the father. These people and others have refused to listen to any audio evidence or they had read and listened to only a small part of the evidence.
This site provides audio and text evidence of severe parental alienation, confirmed by the most experienced court expert, who Judge Michael Mayer defies and ignores. -6. AUDIO Evidence from the court file regarding Severe Parental ALIENATION- referenced in appeal
Ignore and keep secret are some of the biggest weapons for corrupt court-related workers that beat down fathers.
This site provides evidence and audio of police who boast and laugh "it's OK for police to lie" as communicated by a police trainer and senior Eagan police officer who worked with former Eagan police prosecutor Michael J. Mayer. And the senior Eagan police officer demanded, "No, I won't read" [the warnings from court appointed Dr. Reitman to Judge Mayer in his 2.5 page addendum]. The officer demanded, "Nope, I don't care, I don't care" if the custodian uses police to alienate children. -5. AUDIO Evidence from the court file regarding CORRUPT court workers, corrupt police, "Contaminated" Judge Michael J. Mayer.
As Judge Mayer has known very well from Dr Reitman's warnings to him in Nov 2006 and Feb 2007, the custodian's plan has always been to alienate the children and block access to the entire paternal family - until 'when they are 18'. The custodian's words are: "When they are 18, they will decide what they will do." Exhibit F But the actions of the custodian and Judge Mayer are opposite of their words and support 'parental alienation for life.' The plan of alienation against the father and his family has been stated clearly and repeatedly and still Judge Mayer and the corrupt court workers ignore all the warnings, and instead enflame parental alienation to the greatest intensity. Research and common sense prove that sole custody is the perfect environment for parental alienation.
"Don't mess with me" "I'll call the police" have always been the threats from the custodian Exhibit F custodian blocking phone calls and blocking access via computer - audio evidence, whose psych tests confirm her very high behavior scores of histrionic (hysterical), compulsive, lying. And Judge Michael Mayer's Eagan police take severe actions against the father in response to her hysterical lying and without evidence and without need. The custodian's father is a lawyer and they have experienced the 'greatest intensity' of 'power and immunity' to abuse at will. And Judge Mayer has experienced the 'greatest intensity' of 'power and immunity' to abuse at will. Lawyers covering up the severe abuses by other lawyers.
Evidence includes audio and transcript evidence of fraudulent custody evaluator Beth P. Harrington and court managers and administrators who are afraid to "get me in trouble" with judges and "would break the law for Judge Mayer" in order "to get their paychecks" and will do "exactly as the judge wants." -5. AUDIO Evidence from the court file regarding CORRUPT court workers, corrupt police, "Contaminated" Judge Michael J. Mayer.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By one action - reducing father-child relationships and parenting time, the courts increase the annual Billions of dollars of Title IV-D incentives and bonuses taken from your Social Security retirement funds and put in their state treasuries. Every judge knows that the #1 way to increase incentives and cost-effectiveness bonuses to states is to minimize parenting time with middle/upper income fathers to maximize support orders with the least amount of effort, which means blocking, abusing and cutting off these fathers.
The court has a choice to make the biggest impact on allowing millions more children to have equal relationships with both parents, but corrupt courts have mostly refused to allow children equal relationships with their own parents.
This case is an example of how bad it can get and how far the corrupt judges are willing to go and then cover up, 'talk a good game' while enflaming parental alienation for over $356,000 in court worker enrichment and control. 'The rich who are exploiting' kids and fathers for cash. MN Kids for Cash court corruption.
The corrupt court workers believe that they can steal children, minimize fathers, carry out grand theft against fathers, provide the perfect environment for alienating fathers with sole custody, and the fathers should just stay calm and not complain because the court workers don't have bias. If some people helped steal your children, your home and your income, and alienate your children from you, Pawns for Profit - you wouldn't be very happy with them? and you would have some serious words to say?
As much evidence here proves, Judge Mayer's words and actions are often the opposite. He does exactly what he warns against with "fury that you will not overcome" in the 2006-10-05 hearing transcript p.4. For Judge Michael Mayer, "kids are pawns and they are tools to be used" for enormous court Profits! Even if Judge Mayer had listened to Dr. Reitman in 2006, for Judge Mayer it was too soon to resolve the case as Dr. Reitman did successfully, in reaching a verbal equal parenting schedule and much improved father-child relationships. For both lawyers, it was too soon to resolve because there was so much more money to take from both parents. Until the father was bankrupt, it was Judge Mayer's job to intensify the court case, to use the kids as tools and 'Pawns for Profit' which Judge Michael Mayer did very well for both lawyers and his custody evaluator accomplice, and with the greatest intensity of emotional and financial cost.
The court can show findings that Judge Mayer has talked a good game and has tried (negative) things using his (police prosecutor) mentality mode of operation (violating laws). Bottom line is that Judge Mayer has failed completely and miserably ever since Dr. Reitman's quick and incredible father-child successes in Nov. 2006, and then Judge Mayer opposed Dr. Reitman's written "recommendations to the court" and allowed the custodian's lawyer to take control away from Dr. Reitman. Judge Mayer has no excuse for failing to ensure father-child therapy since Jan. 2007, other than failure is 'exactly as he wants.' The court has failed to do one simple thing that is necessary for positive action - remove Judge Mike Mayer. An attorney interviewed in the posted 2008-02-29 audio regarding Judge Mayer stated, "the other attorney said the same thing, when Mike makes up his mind, he's going to dig right in and go back, go backwards."
By empowering a proven neutral counselor, like a good pastor who isn't enriched by court referrals, success could be quick and incredible again, but immediate action is necessary before it's too late. Without the 'managing' and assistance by the court, the custodians can't achieve the greatest intensity of financial and emotional abuse of fathers and children.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The custodian has blocked all father-child therapy since Jan. 2007 and Judge Mayer and Beth P. Harrington have failed to give the custodian negative consequences. The custodian has experienced immunity. The custodian's father is a lawyer. Father-child therapy achieved great success with court-appointed Dr. Reitman in Nov. 2006 and resolution of the whole custody case with an equal parenting schedule agreed by the custodian in early Nov. 2006. But the wickedLY LY'n LawYer Deanne LYnn Dulas bullied and took control away from Dr. Reitman. Then Dr. Reitman wrote on 2006-11-16 "things are falling apart."
On 2006-11-16, Dr. Reitman wrote, "(custodian) is severely alienating the children ... I believe I need to write the Judge and make recommendations accordingly."
On 2006-11-27, Dr. Reitman wrote, "Dear Judge Mayer ... I want the authority to inform the court if alienation will not discontinue on the part of Ms. (custodian) and what remedy should take place, i.e. extended placement with the father."
On 2007-02-26, toward the end of 4 weeks of the father being completely cut off from contact with the children by the custodian in violation of 2007-01-27 court orders, Dr. Reitman wrote his 2.5 page addendum regarding continued alienation and warnings that all should read. Deanne Dulas said the report was 'too late' to be admitted as evidence since Dr. Reitman wasn't seeing the children (after Dulas influenced the custodian not to pay him or bring the children and he quit in late December). Judge Mayer just rubberstamped Dulas as always. Judge Mayer later blocked this addendum from the evidence file in divorce trial because the father hand-wrote notes in the margin of the lawyer's copy. A clean copy was submitted several times with motions and Judge Mayer had received a copy of the original from Dr. Reitman.
On 2007-10-04, Dr. Reitman, the reunification therapist that Judge Mayer had appointed, who was present in the hearing, and hadn't been replaced, was blocked by Judge Mayer from informing the court regarding the 'severe alienation that did not discontinue on the part of the custodian.'
Then Judge Mayer appointed his accomplice, the fraudulent Beth P. Harrington (Beth Painter Harrington) as custody evaluator. See the document of transcript evidence of 'Fraudulent Beth Harrington.' It is clear from the evidence that she violates professional standards and is very prejudiced.
These documents are at -8. Court FILE Documents in the Appendix of the 2012 Appeal and more
_________________________________________________________________________
Judge Mayer ignored all these warnings. Judge Mayer had pre-judiced the case on 10/5/2006 before he appointed the 1st court worker and would continue to give the custodian immunity to do exactly as she wants and violate court orders.
In 2006, the court's appointed expert talked about the custodian,
"she uprooting your relationships with your children" "those kids have been played" "if she doesn't knock it off ... then 50/50" and a week later, "severe alienation once again" "the games she's playing are severe." Regarding child counselor Brent Baumler "I'm concerned that he is participating in alienating you from your children" and a week after that "I don't want to see you walk into any more traps."
One child admitted "it's a game, a game" for the children to be mean to the father.
On 11/3/2012, a non-involved lawyer (who is named on this site) who was seeking to be a judge, admitted in an email, "We always talk a good game of working for the best interest of the children" but we "place children in the middle" ... "the way a judge manages these cases has the profound [greatest intensity] effect on the emotional and financial cost."
Parental alienation, enflamed by Judge Michael Mayer, "it's a game, a game" for corrupt court workers and sole custodians to "place children in the middle" to be "played" and the corrupt court workers, including judges, "always talk a good game" of 'best interest' while a judge manages for the greatest intensity on the emotional and financial cost.
The custodian (and Judge Mayer) are afraid that father-child therapy would be successful again, and achieve equal parenting relationships and even worse in the minds of profiting court workers - resolution. So the custodian (and Judge Mayer) have blocked all father-child therapy since Jan. 2007, and still to the current date (2013).
Judge Michael Mayer has held a death grip on this case since 2006. After 2006, Judge Mayer appears to be deathly afraid of letting anyone have authority in this case who would have a proven record of equal treatment of fathers and mothers and children who will reveal the truth and seek resolution, like Dr. Reitman. Judge Mayer has repeatedly denied the father's annual motions for a parenting consultant, Rule 310.01(a) mandatory Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) and a method of dispute resolution also required by state law. This is how Judge Mayer retains his death grip, afraid to have his failures and endless abuses revealed (in private or public), and to cover-up and to plant endless deception and lies in his letters and orders.
Over 40 documents served to court with mail service affidavits and fax receipts "success" have disappeared in 2012 by file tampering of this case file under Judge Mayer and his clerk Richard Crabb. Everyone in the court staff refuses to log documents received unless Judge Mayer orders them to log documents received. Court transcripts have been refused and tampered under the direction of Judge Mayer. All of the audio evidence disks that were served as exhibits to 4 different motion affidavits are missing from the court file list. Chief Judge Edward Lynch has instructed "no response" to staff and court managers after requests for court orders that were never delivered to the father and regarding documents and audio missing from the file list. Critical evidence is posted on this website. Most of the audio evidence has the Exhibit number and date served in the filename.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Fathers and people who love children pray that judges will some day act on the facts that
To children, neither parent is more important.
Children missing a parent, are missing half of themselves.
We love each other. If you destroy that ...
Don't do that please
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bquuAb3_iyY 1min35sec
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You're reaction is likely to be "Wow." But is it wow just because there is so much written? so much admittedly, when the father can tolerate thinking about Judge Mayer's abuse of children and fathers for profit. Or also because "Wow" - how does Judge Mayer break so many laws and rules and repeatedly claim no bias? and 'you can't remove me,' and create financial and emotional damage of the greatest intensity for children and fathers to enrich his accomplices. Judge Mayer boasted that he is a very good judge because lawyers like him. The lawyers make incredible profits on cases that Judge Mayer enflames. But will he do a survey of the people paying the lawyer's bills and getting beat down and thieved? Judge Mayer's comments online speak of cases blocked to him, like this is something his fellow lawyers often do with him to manage the cases to achieve greatest financial and emotional damage. The "Hell on Earth" case, mentioned by another person online, also used John Burns who blocked the case to his teammate Judge Michael Mayer to generate riches. To prevent endless abuses of power with no consequences, no case should be blocked to a judge or a psychologist or any court worker for more than one year. And require agreement of the both parties before renewal.
The father on this case qualifies with a perfect 11 of the factors below.
You can be a Kids for Cash court corruption case and Parental Alienation case like this, especially if you have these factors (approximately in this order)
You saved a lot of money instead of spending on luxuries - so corrupt workers have a pot of gold - to steal all.
You had a pretty good income (and maybe your ex trashed your record to gain legal advantage in child custody)
The judge can get your good income directly from your income source. Title IV-D matching incentives to the state treasury from your Federal Social Security tax and retirement contributions.
You are religiously conservative. Religion must be 'flexible and accommodating' as liberal Judge Mayer decreed.
Your case has parental alienation - enflaming alienation creates the greatest paychecks for court workers
Your ex lies to police (and everyone else) to gain child custody. (can destroy the non-custodian's livelihood).
You provided evidence of failures and violations by the judge and/or court related workers.
You motioned for equal parenting time to prevent parental alienation and preserve children's relationships. Equal parenting time minimizes 'conflict for profit' and minimizes the Federal matching money to the state treasuries
You hope that there is an honorable judge that some day will restore your good relationships with your children.
Your judge and lawyers and psychologists are connected and/or your ex has connections to the court.
You are a father who dearly loves his children and persistent to spend years trying to improve conditions. (last item because the items at the bottom are the most common on ALL court cases.)
San Diego research shows that court destruction in families is more frequent when there is ample money for the court workers to steal. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2aW5EzX1iY
This case is a "More 'Cash Before Kids'" case. The father must pay $100,000 more, then we'll prepare a 'decision' or 'opinion' if that's enough money, before getting access to kids - like a professional kidnapping. A 'custodian' holds kids like property in her custody. A 'mother' shares children. The father was forced to pay and owe 3/4 of 1 million dollars in cash and tax benefits and turned into a pauper with enormous debts because of his efforts to get more time with his kids.
Judge Mayer has been 'managing the case' for 'greatest intensity financial and emotional' outcome. From the father, over $256,000 has been taken/stolen by the court workers (lawyers, psychologists, transcript reporters, etc.) and the custodian alleged over $100,000 to court workers and admitted that her father Roger (a millionaire, like her) was paying legal costs. Roger had repossessed his daughter and grandchildren and demanded no father-wife counseling, even though she agreed 3 times in the 1 year period after filing for divorce. See the underlying family problems page.
The custodian claimed repeatedly under oath to be in living "penny-to-penny" and that she and the children were in "financial distress" (and Judge Mayer knew that she made this lie to the children, repeatedly blaming the father). For years the custodian continued to make $130,000 a year working part-time, and more now.
By grand theft in court, Judge Mayer made the father into a pauper and rewarded the custodian with over $460,000 in cash and tax benefits from the father (since 2006), so that the custodian became a millionaire with the Feb 2009 decree. Who would like to live on those 'pennies'?
Under oath, the custodian also testified several times that she never started an argument in 10 years of marriage. Even Judge Mayer admitted to the lawyers in the secret judge chamber meetings that he didn't believe that impossible and lying allegation (repeated in testimony under oath, after being asked more than twice, are you sure?). The custodian lied repeatedly to police to gain child custody, which destroyed the father's top secret clearance and the father's livelihood. Those with damaged records and zero credit ratings are the last to get re-employed. The custodian and Judge Mayer created and manufactured massive debts for the father which also eliminate job opportunities. The father has had to work half-time, and at times full-time on the court case to fight for his children and from the consequences of the custodian's lies and games, and also at the same time as he had a full-time job which included unpaid overtime and unpaid travel time. Until the custodian damaged his record, the father had good-paying full-time jobs for 20 continuous years and a very high credit rating.
Judge Mayer and the custodian quickly achieved 2 objectives, which can be used to eliminate any father:
1. Prevent father-child therapy 2. Increase debts and financial judgments to the point that the father can't risk to see his children or appear in court.
The law allows all kinds of actions at $2500 alleged debt including arrest, but some unemployed fathers have been arrested for less, under the 'contempt' clause. Many fathers have debts manufactured that are many times that, and monthly 'obligations' more than their entire income. At the same time as more money is demanded or we punish you, the fathers are denied motions to support their children directly with more love and time in the father's home. The billions in annual Federal matching incentives to the states are from your Social Security retirement funds and are based on the amount of money funneled through the support system, and bonuses for actions taken against fathers. Except for a few situations in Wisconsin using child support debit cards, almost every judge, including Judge Mayer, refuses to have mothers show that the money was actually used for children's needs. It has to go 'through the system' to the mother, or punishment will be made.
Judge Mayer's Feb. 2009 divorce decree (most parts written by custodian's lawyer Deanne Dulas) except the parts of the Decree that confirm that the father a. has no mental diagnosis [and Judge Mayer's accomplice Harrington reluctantly confirmed the father's tests are valid and within normal ranges], b. has not abused the children or the custodian, c. has no record of substance abuse, and d. there are no legal grounds for blocking access. The children have behaved based on the custodian using sole custody in her emotional control of the children against their father, and preventing father-child therapy. No court related person other than Dr. Reitman has tried to hold the custodian accountable for her actions. Judge Michael Mayer clearly prefers to use police and supervision centers to deal with and to enflame alienation in children, instead of father-child and custodian therapy, and instead of increasing parenting time which is the #1 solution of successful reunification.
The custodian in this case has blocked all father-child therapy since Jan. 2007 and therefore blocked access to paternal family and parenting time for years.
In Jan. 2007, after the first court appointed reunification therapist Dr. Reitman talked with counselor Brent Baumler, Brent had allowed father-child sessions of only 5 minutes at the end of 3 separate appointments during 1 year for which the father drove 1 hour roundtrip. The father lived 1 mile from the custodian for 2 years in an apartment with 2 bedrooms plus study (bedroom) and then rented a large 3 bedroom, 2 bath townhouse 5 miles from the custodian for 2 years during the custody evaluations and custody trial. Counselor Brent Baumler held secret visits with the children in the years before and after Dr. Reitman's 2 months (Nov-Dec 2006), and Brent refused to meet with the father before and after Jan. 2007 because the custodian ordered him to block father-counselor visits and father-child therapy.
During their active involvement on the case, every therapist believed that the most important thing was to keep the custodian happy. The reunification therapists' comments regarding the custodian had to be kept mostly secret or greatly watered down, in order to encourage the custodian to keep bringing the children, and that lasted only for 2 months with Dr. Reitman for father-child sessions, and 3 years later only 2 visits (a month apart) with Dr. Powers, but no father-child sessions. Not until after the custodian refused to participate or pay, and then cut off all parenting and phone access to the father for 4 weeks, was Dr. Reitman willing to reveal to Judge Mayer more of the truth of the parental alienation that he had known was happening all along. Deanne Dulas declared that Dr. Reitman hadn't seen the children for 2 months and Judge Mayer just rubber-stamped Dulas, knowing that the custodian refused to cooperate with Dr. Reitman. And 1 month later Judge Mayer issued an order favoring the custodian and she cut off the children for 4 weeks in violation of that court order. It is very risky for a therapist to reveal the truth about a mother when he doesn't have authority over the custodian or be able to assign possible penalties (parenting time and money) for non-cooperation or delays.
In this case, all evidence proved that the longer the children's visits were in the father's home, and the fewer the exchanges with the custodian, the better it went. But the malicious Judge Mayer and his accomplice evaluator Beth P. Harrington did the opposite, and continually made the visits shorter and shorter, only hours instead of days so there were more exchanges with the custodian and her father, and it was as difficult as possible for the father's relatives who Judge Mayer forced to drive hours for exchanges. Malicious Judge Mayer and Beth P. Harrington refused to use the school or the school bus for exchanges and or prevent the custodian from interfering. Instead they demanded that the children go first to the custodian, and then to police stations and detentions centers, to increase parental alienation. Judge Mayer ordered that re-starting parenting time and even attendance at public events cannot be done without the reunification therapists recommendation to Judge Mayer. And then Judge Mayer requires a hearing and up to 3 months delay for an order with his decisions. But Judge Mayer always allowed the custodian to control the reunification therapists and let the custodian block all father-child therapy since Jan. 2007 by forcing fear on the therapist and demanding no father-child therapy with Brent Baumler and Dr. Powers. Listen to the evidence on this linked page:
Exhibit E1 audio - custodian forced Dr. Powers to an agreement of no father-child therapy
Dr. Brian Powers admitted that the custodian forced Dr. Powers to agree to no father-child therapy: "that was the agreement that I had with her". Dr. Powers admitted, "I was concerned that she would think that I was setting her up" "in order for you to see the kids," if he allowed father-child therapy, which he repeatedly said he wanted to do "let's see how it goes, I will try" and would try to ask the custodian for permission (listen to all this audio evidence). Without father-child therapy, there is no restart of parenting time. The custodian's delays and blocking therapy were at the same time that Dr. Powers was requesting father-child therapy from the custodian and warning Judge Mayer that the custodian was delaying therapy. But Dr. Powers (and Dr. Reitman 3 years earlier) quit when the custodian continued to refuse to pay half the cost as ordered by Judge Mayer. She didn't pay a penny to Dr. Powers.
Judge Mayer has never given authority to a neutral therapist over the custodian in order to be able to keep successful therapy going, and Judge Mayer 'managed the case' to achieve his agenda. Judge Mayer hasn't had the backbone to give the custodian negative consequences for her malicious actions, but instead rewards her and gives her immunity.
Children have a Constitutional Right to have Equal Parenting
Parents have a constitutional equal protection right for equal time with their children.
... U.S. Supreme Court rulings demand that Interference of the state must be 'Least Restrictive' (Boerne v. Flores) with 'Compelling' need and 'Only to prevent harm' (Troxel v. Granville).
... the standard of 'best interest' (of the court) clearly violates the U.S. Supreme Court rulings and the U.S. Constitution. The #1 use of best interest is to create battles of inequality to tear families apart to make court workers incredibly rich and powerful, and deprive fathers of children, life, liberty, property and happiness.
... Children want more Love, more Happiness, more Liberty to have more family in their Life, not less??
... 14th Amendment of the Constitution: "Nor shall any state deprive any person of Life, Liberty, or Property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Constitutional Equal protection Rights are violated when a state grants a particular class of individuals (women) the right to engage in an activity (Parenting) yet denies other individuals (men) equal rights to that same activity (Parenting).
The state grants Children the Right to mothering and in most court cases denies Children Equal Rights to fathering, in bold defiance of the demands and requirements of the U.S. Supreme Court and Constitution.
Judge Michael Mayer and clerk Richard Crabb's actions are "Maximum Interference" and "Severely Restrictive" without compelling need, but in revenge to those who reveal his abuses. Career police prosecutor Judge Mayer appears to take pleasure in watching his victims be beat down.
"The U.S. Supreme Court implied that "a (once) married father who is separated or divorced from a mother and is no longer living with his child" could not constitutionally be treated differently from a currently married father living with his child." Quilloin v. Walcott, 98 S Ct 549; 434 US 246, 255-56, (1978).
"The Court stressed, "the parent-child relationship is an important interest that undeniably warrants deference and, absent a powerful countervailing interest, protection." A parent's interest in the companionship, care, custody and management of his or her children rises to a constitutionally secured right, given the centrality of family life as the focus for personal meaning and responsibility." Stanley v. Illinois, 405 US 645, 651; 92 S Ct 1208, (1972).
"The Constitution also protects "the individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters." Federal Courts (and State Courts), under Griswold can protect, under the "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" phrase of the Declaration of Independence, the right of a man to enjoy the mutual care, company, love and affection of his children, and this cannot be taken away from him without due process of law. There is a family right to privacy which the state cannot invade or it becomes actionable for civil rights damages." Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 US 479, (1965).
"The United States Supreme Court noted that a parent's right to "the companionship, care, custody and management of his or her children" is an interest "far more precious" than any property right."
May v. Anderson, 345 US 528, 533; 73 S Ct 840, 843, (1952).
"Parent's rights have been recognized as being "essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free man."
Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 or 426 US 390 ; 43 S Ct 625, (1923).
--
Evidence in court files proves that court related workers (the fathers' and mothers' lawyers, judges and many accomplices) target fathers that had money to steal and enflame the conflict until the father goes bankrupt trying to get more time with his children. The families of fathers who had money are targeted the most for family destruction for profit. (watch YouTube "Progress in San Diego: Coalition for Families and Children). Creating massive debts is one arm of the abuse to cut off fathers. The 'best interest standard' clearly creates incredible conflict and clearly forces parents to allege they are better than the other parent, often destroying the other parent to achieve sole custody. The 'best interest standard' is a very deceptive way which increases conflict to enrich corrupt court workers. Neither parent is more important to children. Neither parent is more important to children. But corrupt courts normally act against normal decency which would treat all parties equally and respect the true needs of children? The best interest of the court is greatly different from the true needs of children - to not be used as pawns by court workers in a best interest battle - and to have equally good relationships with both sides of their family, not totalitarian control by one side (the definition of extreme bias).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The names of the father and mother and children aren't listed on this website, and their names and the case number have been replaced in the documents, in order to protect the privacy for the children. The only parent listed on the site is the custodian's kingpin of the parental alienation operation, and only by first name. If you discover the name of a child anywhere, please email and it will be removed.
The appellate court has refused 2 separate motions by the father in 2012 to keep the family names private on these appellate opinions. The appellate court has instead covered up the names of the court-related workers, including Judge Michael Mayer, covering them in complete secrecy. And then in the appellate court records, the public cannot connect the history and evidence from case to case of the corruption and violations with the names of the corrupt court-related workers including judges, lawyers and court psychologists. The court has a choice (actually a civic duty) to change their mode of operation to an honorable mode of operation of revealing the names of these workers in every appellate record, including public servants whose salaries are paid by the citizens. The court determines whether they reveal the private family names of the parents and continue 'to place children in the middle' while they 'talk a good game' and 'manage the greatest intensity of emotional and financial cost."
----
The appellate court has refused 2 separate motions requesting that their opinions on this case be private. Therefore it is a right to defend against false information and false arguments planted in court orders and opinions.
Rev 3:19 As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten. Therefore be zealous and repent.
2 Cor 7:10 For godly sorrow produces repentance leading to salvation, not to be regretted; but the sorrow of the world produces death.
John 3:36 He who believes in the Son has everlasting life; and he who does not believe the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him.”
Matthew 5:23-24 Therefore if you bring your gift to the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, 24 leave your gift there before the altar, and go your way. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift.
Matt 3:7-8 But when he saw many of the Pharisees {lawyers} and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, “Brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 8 Therefore bear fruits worthy of repentance
Heb 6:4-6 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 if they fall away, to renew them again to repentance, since they crucify again for themselves the Son of God, and put Him to an open shame.
Heb 10:26-27 For if we sin willfully after we have received the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, 27 but a certain fearful expectation of judgment, and fiery indignation which will devour the adversaries
--
Matt 22:14 For many are called, but few are chosen.
Matt 7:21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven.
Luke 6:46 “But why do you call Me ‘Lord, Lord,’ and not do the things which I say?
John 15:14 You are My friends if you do whatever I command you.
John 8:31-32 Then Jesus said to those Jews who believed Him, “If you abide in My word, you are My disciples indeed. And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”
2007-06-05 court appointed expert says 'Being setup by Contaminated Judge Mayer, Abuse of Power, Mayer's evaluator Harrington will do exactly as he wants.' - Press twice for audio
2007-06-05 being setup by Contaminated Judge, Abuse of Power, Harrington will do exactly as he wants - expert appointed by Judge Michael Mayer, talking about Judge Mayer and Beth Harrington.mp32007-06-05 court appointed expert says 'Being setup by Contaminated Judge Mayer, Abuse of Power, Mayer's evaluator Harrington will do exactly as he wants.' Press twice for audio >>
2007-06-05 being setup by Contaminated Judge, Abuse of Power, Harrington will do exactly as he wants - expert appointed by Judge Michael Mayer, talking about Judge Mayer and Beth Harrington.mp3