This site is maintained and posted by a third party. No content on this site may be used or copied without permission. Unfortunately, the courts repeatedly refuse to respect the privacy of families, but the courts keep the names of the violators - the judges and court workers completely secret by using code names - presiding judge, petitioner's attorney, etc.
use search this site for the key words
Some of the latest postings are listed or linked below.
Added to 6. Audio Evidence regarding alienation:
As the judges and court workers and police know very well, sole custody is the perfect environment for parental alienation, which generates the biggest paychecks for court workers, and biggest Federal incentive payments. Kids for Cash. Pawns for Profit.
As the most experienced court appointed expert on this case stated, 'If one parent can't co-parent, then the other parent is not going to suffer because you have the domination and the kids on your side, then the recommendation should be fine, it's almost a 50-50 split.'
But Judge Michael Mayer rejected his "recommendations to the court" that included, as the custodian briefly had agreed, 2 midweek overnights a week with the father who lived 1 mile from the custodian. The custodian's lawyer Deanne Dulas and Judge Mayer took control away from the expert, and later Judge Mayer denied the expert from making another report in a hearing, and later Judge Mayer, in illegal testimony by a judge, denigrated the expert in trial when he wasn't present, and condemned his protocol of shared parenting. For Judge Mayer, sole custody is the best protocol - to enflame parental alienation and profit the court workers.
Dr. Jayne Major, parental alienation researcher and leader
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQIXAjC_v50
Excellent summary - BE SURE TO WATCH. But know that Dr. Amy Baker's research data (on the site) showed that the parental alienator was always the parent with the most parenting time, regardless of gender.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Wh4fx-uY-ho
disturbed people get the advantage in court
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVT0aEPc01Q
courts don't stop sociopaths [sociopath is similar to psychopath]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4VoK0MLgg4
4:00 court is bizarre, doesn't make sense, courts are not protecting against alienation
5:30 court is the poorest 'imaginable' way to 'resolve'
added to the Home page:
Corrupt court workers believe that they can steal children, minimize fathers, carry out grand theft against fathers, provide the perfect environment for alienating fathers with sole custody, and the fathers should just stay calm and not complain because the court workers don't have bias. If some people helped steal your children, your home and your income, and alienate your children from you - you wouldn't be very happy with them? and you would have some serious words to say?
As much evidence here proves, Judge Mayer's words and actions are often the opposite. He does exactly what he warns against with "fury that you will not overcome" in the 2006-10-05 hearing transcript p.4. For Judge Michael Mayer, "kids are pawns and they are tools to be used" for enormous court Profits! Even if Judge Mayer had listened to Dr. Reitman in 2006, for Judge Mayer it was 'too soon' to resolve the case as Dr. Reitman did successfully, in reaching a verbal equal parenting schedule and much improved father-child relationships. For both lawyers, it was 'too soon' to resolve because there was so much more money to take from both parents. Until the father was bankrupt, it was Judge Mayer's job to intensify the court case, to use the kids as tools and 'Pawns for Profit' which Judge Michael Mayer did very well for both lawyers and his custody evaluator accomplice, and with the greatest intensity of emotional and financial cost.
including custodian's income and 2010-07-09 letter from Support division confirming 'paying in full at least 12 months' (actually over 5 years)
Audio evidence
Exhibit F custodian blocking phone calls and blocking access via computer - audio evidence
The custodian clearly communicates again her parental alienation agenda since Day 1 against the paternal family,
"I will not trust you people with my children. When they are 18, they will decide what they will do." Until
age 18 and beyond, she will continue to brainwash them (lots of audio evidence) and alienate against their father.
---
Judge Mayer believes there is "not a compelling circumstance" for returning the previously submitted 40+ documents of evidence to the court file which were disposed of through illegal tampering of the file and obstruction of justice. Judge Mayer has apparently used this "as an opportunity for" a 2nd illegal disposal of the 500+ pages of evidence.
--
page 4. state laws broken by Judge Mayer
When a judge and/or lawyers break the law, or conspire/agree to break the law, that doesn't justify breaking the state laws or continuing to break the state laws.
A best friend of the court, an abusive judge like Judge Mayer (MN Out of Control Judges - Horror Cases, Hell on Earth, Judge Lynch's 1st District 'biased' courts) can be the worst enemy to the reputations of all judges? can be the worst enemy to all judges if a judge is allowed to continue breaking state laws, rules of court and Supreme Court rulings without serious consequences?
>> I appeal the court to also confirm this legal argument:
1. Any 'expert or a judge who says sole physical custody' isn't a primary cause of parental alienation, 'they are crazy, the judge shouldn't be on the bench and the expert shouldn't be practicing in his or her field'? (the quoted parts are words of Judge Mayer).
Every judge should be required to read Dr. Amy Baker's book? "Adult Children of Parental Alienation - Breaking the Ties that Bind," and see that sole physical custody was the consistent factor that enflamed parental alienation in every divorce case, regardless of the gender of the parent
key points page:
The 2011 and 2012 APPEALS are UNOPPOSED by the custodian. She filed no response for either appeal. Yet in 2011 and 2012 appeals, the court was biased enough to completely deny justice to the father and did everything to the benefit of the custodian and the court. In the 2011 and 2012 appeals, the court used their unrestrained powers to beat down the father, as if this is the court's standard mode of operation and women don't even need to lift a finger. Certainly that is an appearance of bias, when the appeal is unopposed by the other party and then the appeals of a father and requests and Rights of Children are denied completely.
The U.S. Supreme Court in Baldwin v. Brown mandates that the courts provide "substantial justice" to pro se citizens. Substantial is defined as full and abundant. The court in this MN Kids for Cash case has sought out any trick, or petty excuse, or most of the time invented rules that didn't exist, in order to completely deny justice to the pro se father's motions. The court's mode of operation is in complete opposition and in violation and defiance of U.S. Supreme Court mandates.
home page
Judge Mayer has no excuse for failing to ensure father-child therapy since Jan. 2007, other than failure 'is exactly as he wants.' The court has failed to do one simple thing that is necessary for positive action - remove Judge Mike Mayer. An attorney interviewed in the posted 2008-02-29 audio regarding Judge Mayer stated, "the other attorney said the same thing, when Mike makes up his mind, he's going to dig right in and go back, go backwards."
"The [U.S. Supreme] Court stressed, "the parent-child relationship is an important interest that undeniably warrants deference and, absent a powerful countervailing interest, protection." A parent's interest in the companionship, care, custody and management of his or her children rises to a constitutionally secured right, given the centrality of family life as the focus for personal meaning and responsibility." Stanley v. Illinois, 405 US 645, 651; 92 S Ct 1208, (1972).
14. The Wisdom of Honorable dispute resolution. Issue of state or church?
13. Honorable mode of operation - commentary
alienation audio - Mall of America rides offer, Roger calls it bribery, silliness, child repeats the accusation 'bribery' and others in Exhibit A1 audio
- more audio evidence and documents that disappeared from the court file
Exhibit E1 custodian demanded an agreement which blocked father-child therapy
- Dr. Amy Baker research appendix - the custodian is always the alienator 6a. Further information regarding audio evidence of parental alienation more audio evidence posted. Additional documents and audio will be at the ShareEqually3 website.
The appellate court has refused 2 separate motions by the father in 2012 to keep the family names private on these appellate opinions. The appellate court has instead covered up the names of the court-related workers, including Judge Michael Mayer, covering them in complete secrecy. And then in the appellate court records, the public cannot connect the history and evidence of the corruption and violations with the names of the corrupt court-related workers including judges, lawyers and court psychologists. The court has a choice (actually a civic duty) to change their mode of operation to an honorable mode of operation of revealing the names of these workers in every appellate record, including public servants whose salaries are paid by the citizens. The court determines whether they reveal the private family names of the parents and continue 'to place children in the middle' while they 'talk a good game' and 'manage the greatest intensity of emotional and financial cost."