keywords: "Kids for Cash Minnesota" court corruption ring enflaming Parental Alienation for Profits - "Contaminated" Judge Michael J. Mayer, Beth P. Harrington, DeAnne L. Dulas, Eagan police, chief Judge Edward Lynch, Brent Baumler, Mayer's clerk Richard Crabb
2007-06-05 court appointed expert says 'You're being set up ... by Contaminated Judge Mayer ... Abuse of Power ... Mayer's evaluator Harrington will do exactly as he wants.' audio>
2007-06-05 being setup by Contaminated Judge, Abuse of Power, Harrington will do exactly as he wants - expert appointed by Judge Michael Mayer, talking about Judge Mayer and Beth Harrington.mp3Contaminated Judge Michael Mayer has refused annual requests to remove himself from this case for over 15 years since 2006. He keeps total control of the case in order to cover up his human rights crimes and chief judges cover up too. Contaminated Judge Michael Mayer also uses his former employer the Eagan Police to commit his human rights crimes with immunity. The evil divorce industry is over $50 Billion a year for lawyers alone.
This site is maintained and posted by a third party. No content on this site may be used or copied without permission. Unfortunately, the courts repeatedly refuse to respect the privacy of families, but the courts keep the names of the violators - the judges and court workers completely secret by using code names - presiding judge, petitioner's attorney, etc.
Notice: The purpose of all these pages has always been to bring people to the knowledge of the truth - that those who claim to be Christians - J. Mayer and others - cannot receive salvation without true repentance and godly sorrow (2 Cor 7:10) for their actions in this case. True sorrow requires the visible fruits of reconciliation (Matt 5:23-24, Matt 3:7-8). The goal, if it isn't impossible for them to repent (Heb 6:4-6, Heb 10:26-27), is that these people repent and reconcile for their violations in abusing children in their abuses of power to willingly violate human rights, constitutional protections, natural liberties and Christ's commands and design. (These verses of God's Word are quoted at the page bottom). By their fruits you will know - Judge Michael Mayer, his evaluator Beth Harrington, divorce lawyer Deanne Dulas, the custodian and the custodian's father lawyer Roger are on the path to eternal punishment by God the Almighty Judge. Lawyers know that their chance of going to heaven is probably ten in a billion, but some practice as fake Christians anyway while demolishing families for very high profits.
The 2 column list of motions is two pages down.
FATHER - COOPERATION, RESOLUTION v. MAYER - ALIENATION, ENRICHMENT, 1-SIDED BIAS
________________________________________________________________________________________
Preface:
The purpose of this information is to show evidence of malicious behavior and bias and discrimination by Judge Michael Mayer so that he can be removed from this case. Judge Mayer communicated in his 10-13-2012 letter "the ability to remove me is terminated" (he expects immunity, so he can continue breaking state laws, violating court rules, Supreme Court rulings, Constitutional rights, 'as long as he isn't caught') by the other judges and held responsible for bias (Minnesota criteria). The Honorable Judge Michael Mayer wrote, "you have not made any showing of prejudice or bias on my part."
> So citizens of the world, How Many Actions of "Bias"? can you find in all this evidence that has been provided in "showings" to Judge Mayer and Chief Judge Edward Lynch since 2006 and to the appellate court in 2011 and 2012.
> Please comment on the Comments page (2.)
> Just the appearance of bias is grounds for a judge to remove himself or be removed.
In Judge Michael Mayer's 10-10-2010 order he declared in his Findings of "Fact", as item 1, "The Court does not have any bias toward either party in this proceeding." ("The Court" is the code name for Judge Mayer.) So Judge Mayer has progressed in 2012 from his 2010 declaration that he "does not have any bias", to simply declaring himself 'un-removable as long as he isn't caught' by a majority of fellow judges, who have refused so far to hold him accountable for his malicious actions.
No content on this site may be copied or used without permission. All information is posted by a 3rd party. Appellate court has refused to keep information private, except for the court's habit of keeping the names of judges and court workers completely secret by using code names. Isn't it amazing and abusive to all citizens that an appellate opinion, to an appeal that includes a request to remove a judge, has absolutely no mention of the county judge's name?
_____________________________________________________________________________________
KIDS FOR CASH court corruption - over $256,000 from the father to Judge Michael Mayer's court corruption ring plus over $460,000 of grand theft from the father by Judge Mayer to the custodian in cash, property and tax benefits - and complete parental alienation of great intensity - assisted and enflamed by Judge Michael Mayer. By his grand theft of children and money in court, Judge Mayer 'managed' the outcome, creating a millionaire custodian and a bankrupt father.
Judge Michael Mayer's court corruption ring took a total of more than $356,000 when adding the $100,000+ fees the millionaire custodian claimed (without full evidence) to pay court workers and testified that her (millionaire) lawyer father Roger paid her fees. The custodian didn't need to make much more effort than to dictate her demands in motions and wait for Judge Michael Mayer to serve the father's 'head' to her on a silver platter, as Judge Mayer repeatedly did. Eventually, the custodian stopped making efforts and relied on the malicious and prejudiced and corrupt court workers to use their standard mode of operation of abusing their powers to abuse fathers.
Positive vs. Negative, Cooperate/Resolve vs. Alienation/Conflict, 'Talk Good' vs. Mayer 'Actions Malicious'
This is a tragic case of the court workers and custodian Abusing KIDS FOR CASH. "MN Out of Control Judge" Michael Mayer 'talks a good game' denying that he 'places children in the middle,' while doing exactly that, and uses children as bait to enrich court workers. A lawyer running for judge was bold enough to admit, "we always talk a good game of working for the best interests of the children" but the court workers "place children in the middle" and "a judge manages these cases" for "profound effect on emotional and financial" outcomes. Yes, abusing Kids for Cash - emotional destruction of children and fathers for the greatest intensity of financial gain for court friends. Profound means "greatest intensity." What good father wouldn't pay tens or hundreds of thousands (like this case) in financial ransom to be with his children for a few more hours? The lawyer's email quote is at the bottom of this page. The case on this website is an example of how Judge Michael Mayer "manages these cases" for the greatest intensity of financial gain and growth for all of the "out of control judges, lawyers", psychologists, court workers, police and other "place children in the middle" industries in this corruption ring. 'The rich who are exploiting' fathers and Kids for Cash.
Judge Michael Mayer has refused to allow anyone but himself decide on parenting issues for years of fury by him since 2006. A totalitarian mode. That is the sure way to cover-up his malicious actions of endlessly enflaming parental alienation and to achieve his pre judiced agenda - pre judged by him at his first hearing in Oct 2006. He declared (in the transcript) that the outcome of the case was known - before any parental alienation expert or therapist saw the case, and before he started "managing the case." Judge Michael Mayer has always refused to appoint a parenting consultant and endlessly demanded his fraudulent accomplice Beth Harrington for evaluator and her friends for therapy. It is critical to have a consultant with decision making authority who has a proven track record of fair and equal treatment of fathers and mothers and children. That is very rare in the court system. Judge Mayer failed to give any reunification therapist the authority to achieve and maintain positive change.
Dr. Reitman achieved the best resolution when the mother agreed to an equal parenting schedule in early Nov 2006, and she shared that decision with the children and the father in Dr. Reitman's office. Then, as Dr. Reitman stated, her lawyer (Deanne Dulas quickly called and bullied him demanding) "woe, woe, woe, you're doing way too much" (to achieve a fair resolution for the best interest of the children). Then Judge Mayer defied, sabotaged and stomped on Dr. Reitman's successes and ordered the use of detention centers which enflamed parental alienation. At the same time as therapists urged father-child therapy to Judge Mayer, the custodian endlessly delayed and prevented the children from any therapy with their father since Jan. 2007. That's another way to keep the parental alienation secret and of greatest intensity. Judge Mayer always let the custodian and her lawyer control the therapists. Judge Mayer has successfully threatened and bullied to maintain secrecy on this case for many years. A totalitarian mode. It's time for Judge Michael Mayer to stop abusing children for his personal agendas.
The best available research of parental alienation cases, with interviews of 40 adults by Dr. Amy Baker who were alienated as children, proves that the alienating parent was always the parent with the most parenting time, regardless of gender. The #1 consistent factor in parental alienation was one parent with more parenting time. The proof in the Apr. 2007 book appendix chart is posted on this site under further information on parental alienation (6a.). And the custodian needs to change behaviors too. These 2 factors are common sense and have been known for many years, and this was Dr. Reitman's methodology - more parenting time, improve all behaviors. On the 7/28/08 Harrington transcript p.33, Judge Mayer illegally testified and steered his accomplice Harrington, and stated that Dr. Reitman was "doomed for failure based upon the methodology regardless of -" the custodian. The methodology of Judge Mayer and his fraudulent Beth Harrington, for handling misbehaving alienated children is to severely restrict time with the alienated father, and to allow the sole custodian to use police and detention centers (to increase alienation and brainwashing of children), and to do this instead of father-child therapy and consequences and change of the custodian's behaviors, and instead of increasing time with the father, in a positive environment without police and detention centers, as warned by Dr. Reitman. The methodology used by Judge Mayer and his fraudulent Beth Harrington has no evidence of success, except that their methodology has the greatest effect on managing the greatest paychecks for the child custody industry workers.
Harrington made numerous bold lies in testimony, then 'when caught' under cross-examination pressure, she reversed on a few and admitted that the psych scores of the father are "valid" and "within the normal limits." Under pressure, Harrington admitted very reluctantly that the psych test scores of the custodian in both test years show that she has a very high score (97 B) in the middle of the compulsive personality disorder range (MCMI-III) and "very elevated" scores in histrionic (82), narcissism (74) and MMPI-2 validity 'lie scales' (77 T). The custodian is an expert in compulsive hysterical lying to police, calling 911 for over 12 exchanges (which should have been at school without her interference). She called police to document that one of the children wanted to stay with the custodian, as she wanted, so she kept all of them - that was the rule that she created - all children or none. And she lied to police to dispatch them for 'welfare' checks, and even tried to get a false Amber Alert which Judge Mayer didn't approve of, but Judge Mayer gave no consequences to change the behaviors of the custodian. Instead, to make it easier on his former police co-workers, Judge Mayer 'managed the case' to move the exchanges to the police and detention centers, so police wouldn't have to go out of their way as much, 'regardless' of the profound effect on emotional damage on children.
Several case histories show that Judge Michael Mayer abuses his power when his malicious behaviors and actions are questioned and/or exposed. These people experienced Judge Michael Mayer going out of control, overboard, losing his temper, very malicious, vindictive, like a vendetta. 1. Judge Michael Mayer is on someone's internet webpage of only nine "MN Out of Control Judges". 2. A second person on that webpage calls another case with Judge Michael Mayer "Hell on Earth", and that person was from Judge Mayer's expensive neighborhood (ex has connections) and has been cut off from the children by Judge Mayer for years. When Judge Mayer's malicious actions are cited as evidence, he responds with a vendetta of 'greatest intensity' with his complete "fury that you will not overcome" (Judge Mayer's quote 10/2006). You have likely heard "Hell hath no fury like" - like Judge Michael Mayer. 3. The appellate case C2-97-302 is a third example on the internet of then police prosecutor Michael Mayer being sued for an "ethics complaint" including his "abuses of process and malicious prosecution." 4. Below is evidence of another, likely the worst and most prejudiced cover-ups of Judge Michael Mayer's malicious, abusive, vindictive "Hell on Earth" cases, of his endless abuses of the process rules of court, breaking of state laws, enflaming parental alienation, all of which generated ungodly riches for court workers. This is what happens when judges fail to hold judges and wickedly lying lawyers accountable for their actions.
Nearly all POSITIVE requests and motions to Judge Michael Mayers for COOPERATION and RESOLUTION and COMMON SENSE have resulted in NEGATIVE actions by Judge MAYER to rule with 1-sided discrimination and increase conflict and alienation which greatly enriches court workers, for the best interest of the court workers, by placing children in the middle, and having disastrous emotional effects. Judge Mayer has refused to recuse himself, blocked ADR, sabotaged reunification therapy for years and prevented any honorable person from taking positive action since Dr. Reitman. It is clear that Judge Mayer's #1 objective is to protect his reputation by ordering secrecy which he has maintained with threats until now and totalitarian control - allowing the custodian to violate orders and block all parenting access and father-child therapy, with no input from anyone but Judge Mayer's accomplices, so that he can cover up his failures and his abuses of power.
Every order that Judge Michael Mayer has issued on this case was to increase conflict, increase parental alienation, enrich court workers and rule in 1-sided discrimination. Even though Judge Mayer appointed Dr. Reitman as reunification therapist and to investigate parental alienation, Judge Mayer defiantly rejected most of Dr. Reitman's warnings and recommendations to the court, and blocked him from making a followup report when he was in court. Dr. Reitman resolved this case and achieved cooperation (until his control was taken away by the custodian's lawyer Deanne Lyn' Dulas). Because with cooperation and resolutions, there is no money for court workers and government agencies. There are especially no financial rewards with equal parenting.
As you see in this case, a mother is a parent who loves the children and allows the children to have a good relationship with the father. A custodian is a parent that takes totalitarian control of the children as the sole property of one parent.
Here is a summary comparison of some issues - positive requests vs. negative bias Mayer actions:
FATHER COOPERATION, RESOLUTION
vs. JUDGE MICHAEL MAYER - ALIENATION, ENRICHMENT, 1-SIDED DISCRIMINATION
Father's motions for Parenting Consultant/Coordinator were made at least every year on 9/18/06, 2/26/07, 4/9/07, 9/28/07, 11/11/08, 3/27/09, 4/28/09, 11/8/10, 12/10/10.
The custodian opposed every one of these motions for out-of-court dispute resolution.
DENIED ALL. NEGATIVE BIASED Judge MAYER continues to violate state law 518.1705 Subd. 2 which requires a dispute resolution method.
Father requested evidentiary hearings.
DENIED ALL. NEGATIVE Judge MAYER broke this law - It is mandatory by state law 518.175 that judges must hold (and initiate) evidentiary hearings when significantly restricting parenting time. Judge MAYER repeatedly violated this law and ordered severe restrictions and terminations 5 times from October 2006 to May 2008 based on wicked lies.
NO EVIDENTIARY HEARING was ALLOWED by Judge Mayer until almost 2 years later starting July 29, 2008 and the order from the first evidentiary hearing wasn't issued until Feb. 11, 2009! 2.5 years after Judge Mayer started breaking this law.
Father motioned for Alternate Dispute Resolution outside court on 4/17/09, 10/12/09, 1/8/10, 5/6/10 sole legal, 11/15/10, regarding ADR/settlement cooperation.
DENIED. NEGATIVE Judge MAYER held illegal hearings when there was no attempt or certification for settlement/ADR.
Certification was mandatory per Rule 303.03c before a post-decree hearing can be authorized in court.
Based on these illegal hearings, Judge MAYER issued (illegal) orders on 10/15/09, 1/8/10, 5/6/10 (sole legal), 10/14/10, 11/22/10, 1/10/12. In his 10/8/2010 letter, Judge Mayer boldly lied that attempt/certify wasn't mandatory.
(The rule was sabotaged/changed on May 2012 - below)
Father asked the court to set hearing dates Mayer repeatedly denied motions for hearings by lying that dates weren't set, even when Mayer set dates in his orders 10/1/10, 10/19/10, 3/23/11, and also 4/27/11, 12/8/11
The lies planted by Judge Mayer in the file are endless.
------------------
Individual motions and actions sequentially:
Oct '06 - father opposed the motion to restrict visits
Oct 2006 - Mayer severely restricted parenting time.
Nov '06 - with court appointed Dr. Reitman's help, custodian agreed to equal parenting. Custodian told this to the children with the father and Dr. Reitman as witnesses. She reversed after meeting with her wickedly lying lawyer Deanne Dulas and custodian's father Roger.
Mayer's divorce decree states "306. His claim that
she revoked her alleged agreement for joint
custody does not amount to bad conduct on her part."
Clearly the lawyers, with Mayer's managing, had an
enormous amount of money yet to steal. It was
years 'too soon' to resolve this case with cooperation.
Court appointed Dr. Reitman warned Mayer not to use police stations.
DEFIANTLY, Mayer allowed and later ordered police station for exchanges - more alienation, more money
Dr. Reitman advised Mayer to use school for exchanges.
Ignored - Mayer defied cooperation advice. Mayer ordered exchanges at supervision centers to make sure the centers could grow and receive a share of the riches from this case
Father's motions for exchanges at school Denied - increased alienation by using police station
Father's motions for adults to stay in vehicles Denied - orders are 1-sided discrimination. Custodian continued to go to father's vehicle and harass the father in front of the children and he couldn't respond. Mayer kept a no contact order vs. father to enrich lawyers by forcing his communication through lawyers
Father's motion to access family photographs Denied repeatedly for 2 yrs - until after the custody evaluation - to block evidence of good relationships
Father's motions to receive single school pictures. Denied repeatedly - never approved by Mayer to date
Father's motions to take 1 or 2 children at a time. Denied - Mayer ordered all children at once, as custodian demanded
Later, Judge Mayer's radical feminist custody evaluator Harrington admitted under pressure in cross- examination that 1 or 2 was good intuition by the father
Father's motions to remove Judge Mayer. Denied. Dr. Reitman said: Mayer "is a contaminated judge"
Father's motions to remove Beth Harrington Denied repeatedly. Dr. Reitman said: Harrington is "somebody who was forced onto this case by Mayer that he probably knows will do exactly as he wants" "an abuse of power" by Judge Mayer
Harrington is the ringleader of the deceptive AFCC MN which derives bigger paychecks by increasing conflict. She is a complete fraud- see Harrington transcript notes
Father's motion again for exchanges at school. Denied - Mayer ordered the use of supervision centers for visits which enflamed parental alienation when the children were misbehaving due to brainwashing against their father by the custodian, and to keep the centers funded and growing (with matching funds from social security Title IV-D). Mayer knew the children had held onto the doors and refused to go into these alienation centers. 7 more months of evidence had proved that the custodian and her father were the single consistent and remaining factor causing conflict at exchanges. But Mayer covered up with impossible lies in his findings of fact, and copied Dulas' lies. The father wasn't even present at exchanges for 7 months. A year later, the custodian admitted under cross-examination pressure, that there were no problems in exchanges at school when only one parent was present. But she fought against using school or the school bus, so Mayer did nearly everything exactly as custodian wanted and ordered supervision centers for parental alienation.
Requests by Dr. Gilbertson for a fair custody evaluation.
Defied by Mayer, who instead rubber-stamped Dulas requests
Father's motion to remove Moxie therapists.
Denied. Mayer ordered Moxie who are Harrington accomplices. Moxie refused to accept insurance and Dr. Powers stated: "Moxie .. wanted to use a team of 3 of its therapists (so alienation couldn't be confirmed by 1 therapist) Dr. Powers stated: "The top probably 3 of 5 of Moxie goals are money, money, money, and profit"
Requests by Dr. Powers to end the delay of reunification therapy.
Defied by Judge Mayer who denied his requests
Dr. Gilbertson warned Mayer against sole legal.
Defied by Mayer who ordered sole legal because it would increase parental alienation. Mayer ordered sole legal custdoy in a secret illegal hearing where Mayer didn't give the father phone access to the hearing
Father's motion -Children's Rights to family access.
NO Action. Ignored father's motion.
19. Sep 2010. Mayer refused to allow phone access to hearing.
20. Mayer refused to cancel Nov 2010 hearing.
Then Mayer planted lies saying father cancelled hearing
NO Action. Mayer failed to issue a order on children's access
21. Father's motion for Alternate Dispute Resolution.
Denied. No cooperation. Only 1-sided discrimination
In the Dec 2011 hearing, malicious Mayer mentioned the father's attempts at ADR in a list of actions that Mayer despised.
22. 2nd hearing for General Court motions Mayer failed again to issue an order on Children's Rights to access. Instead he illegally crushed support modification motion, which by law must be ruled in expedited court.
Mayer acts only on money and ignores children's rights
23. Motion for 2-way no contact order
Denied - only 1-SIDED DISCRIMINATION allowed
24. Motion - stop blocking phone calls to children.
NO Action by Mayer - Custodian is blocking/interfering with all calls since 8/18/12. Judge Mayer has failed to take any action on this Appendix A right or any Children
25. Rights for Parenting access since mid 2010.
Ignored. To Mayer, it's money - and revenge for exposing his violations.
26. Certification of ADR or settlement try is mandatory
May 2012 - Rule 303.03(c) changed/sabotaged - no longer mandatory to attempt ADR or settlement. Added exclusions - a simple no contact order, or any 'good cause' as determined by the judge.
The #1 'good cause' is more money for lawyers?
The wording and requirement regarding "cooperation" and "to accomplish resolution" have been REMOVED. The court doesn't profit from either!
27. Rule change regarding: affidavits, orders - What value is there to require swearing? to an affidavit (or have a judge sign a court order) that only "contains facts", and was formerly "should be factual".
May 2012 rule change - formerly, "any relevant affidavit" "should be specific and factual". The new rule changed this to "contain facts". That is the lawyers' and judges' standard of facts (= contains facts).
"contains = includes".
"should" "contains" allows deception, lies (as lawyers, judges do)
So a sworn affidavit is swearing to deception.
The lawyer/judge RULE and definition of truth and the judges (findings of) fact is - Truth only needs to include facts.
Did Judge Michael Mayer submit these rules changes? since he was long violating and making his own definition of this rule and the ADR rule
28. Requests for financial fairness
Denied - There is a long list of 1-SIDED fraud and grand theft by Judge Michael Mayer, bankrupting the father and making the custodian a millionaire.
Details:
Please pardon any duplication or lack of good flow. Writing about this is avoided for a long time, then written quickly, but taking lots of time to verify facts, and then left in draft form, in order to deal with something else that isn't as terrible as dealing with these abuses of children by corrupt court workers and its friends.
In late July 2005 the mother's father Roger carried out his plan and demanded divorce and took control of 3 precious children and his 44 year old daughter, who through a secret divorce filing and ambush of endless lies instantly became sole custodian. The moment of separation was when Roger enflamed an argument with the father, who never dared to argue with Roger in 13 years. Roger took action to keep the father out of the family home permanently and Roger immediately moved into the family home, living with his daughter and children for 2 weeks at at time for several months.
early Aug 2005 Custodian talked about reconciliation for the 1st time after filing for divorce. She created conditions for starting marriage counseling, which she stated in writing, through her first wickedly lying lawyer. Father completed the conditions. Father asked custodian's father Roger for permission to have marriage counseling with his estranged wife. Roger demanded no marriage counseling. Custodian REVERSED because she couldn't dare to disobey her father Roger.
Dec 2005 - custodian moved with the children out-of-state right before their children's Christmas service - and moved into the home of Roger and his wife for 3 months.
Feb 2006 - custodian told her two MN pastors that she would pursue marriage counseling (2nd agreement after filing) and would put the legal case on hold for 6 months. Roger wasn't in this conference and never agreed to either of these. Within days, the custodian reversed and continued legal attack.
Mar 2006 - POSITIVE - FATHER changed jobs from out-state and started living 2 miles from the custodian and on the same school bus route. NEGATIVE CUSTODIAN created alienation on the bus route by demanding that the children bypass the father's home and continue on the route and come to her first, instead of being dropped off first at the father's home. NEGATIVE CUSTODIAN created alienation, and harassed the father face-to-face in exchanges that could have been avoided.
May 2006 - Custodian had a secret hearing with Judge Sutherland who formerly worked for the firm of the custodian's wickedly lying MN attorney Deanne Lyn' Dulas. The NEGATIVE CUSTODIAN made up wild lies to get an order to ban the father from going to the children's school and church.
Sept 2006 - After 6 months of continued legal attacks, the custodian AGREED with her 2 pastors to consider marriage counseling (3rd time after filing divorce in secret). Custodian again failed to keep her agreement and REVERSED. Her father Roger never gave permission for marriage counseling at any time after he demanded divorce.
Oct 2006 - First court hearing in MN after the case was transferred from out of state. Judge Mayer started as the one and only judge from 2006 to present (2013) to hear this case in general court. NEGATIVE action by Judge MAYER to increase alienation - ordered severe restrictions on parenting time based on wild lies by the wickedly lying lawyer Deanne Lynn Dulas.
Early Nov 2006 - in reunification therapy with POSITIVE DR. REITMAN, custodian AGREED to equal parenting and told the children in Dr. Reitman's office with the father present. Custodian REVERSED on this agreement within days. This agreement was never agreed to, or presented to Roger or her lawyer Deanne Dulas.
Dec 2006 - POSITIVE to decrease alienation - Dr. Paul REITMAN warned Judge Michael Mayer in writing to not use police stations for exchanges because it increased parental alienation. Roger continued to demand all exchanges at the police station. POSITIVE Dr. REITMAN wrote that exchanges should be at school which would eliminate the face-to-face of parents at these exchanges.
Jan 2007 Enflaming parental alienation, NEGATIVE ROGER demanded "we only go the police station" for child exchanges (see recording).
Mar 2007 - NEGATIVE action by Judge Mayer to increase alienation - ordered exchanges at a police station with both parents present.
Apr 2007 - POSITIVE - FATHER motioned again to exchange children before/after school with only one parent present. POSITIVE - FATHER motioned that adults stay in their vehicles during exchanges to eliminate any harassing by the custodian or Roger. NEGATIVE action by J. MAYER - denied the father's motion for increased cooperation and resolution, NEGATIVE action by J. MAYER denied motion for school exchanges, NEGATIVE action by J. MAYER denied having adults stay in vehicles. Father's motion to receive single school pictures. Denied repeatedly - never approved by Mayer.
Apr 2007 NEGATIVE Judge Mayer's defiance against warnings - Judge Mayer's unconsciousness to children's feelings. In this hearing Judge Mayer stated, "I guess I don't see the police station as having a negative connotation, maybe because I worked with cops most of my career. I think the lobby of the police station is an appropriate place."
May 2007 - NEGATIVE action by Judge MAYER to increase alienation - renewed his order demanding exchanges at a police station, but added that a relative (hours away roundtrip), not a local family friend, had to pick up the children, and the father couldn't be present. The custodian continued to create alienation at exchanges with relatives who drove hours roundtrip. This distance problem eliminated all Wednesday visits (as J. Mayer knew) even though the father's friends who knew the children were willing and local. NEGATIVE MAYER created a no contact order against father to ENRICH lawyers by forcing communication through lawyers and allow the custodian to continue to harass the father who had to remain silent under her abuse.
May and Dec 2007 - BIZARRE action by Judge MAYER - ordered that "No negative connotations shall be drawn by the exchange location. Respondent shall not attempt to negotiate with Petitioner to use a different exchange location." That's like sending children into a prison and ordering them not to have negative thoughts about the prisoners (because that's what Judge Mayer's order says). His orders are bizarre. How can an order to have no negative connotations, override the feelings and observations of children??? Judge Mayer defiantly rejected the PhD child expert warnings about children's feelings. Judge Mayer can order adults not to say anything, but kids aren't that stupid or without emotion in these environments? For decades, government statistics prove that divorce judges create most of the juvenile delinquents by giving solo moms custody. But "Contaminated" divorce judge Mayer boasts that he was chosen as a juvenile judge and acts as youth confirmation instructor at the Easter Lutheran Church Eagan [radically liberal] which violently rejects Christ's command for Matthew 18 mediation with him for reconciliation and ignores proven facts and is afraid to question him.
Judge Mayer's own statements show that he is unconscious to children's emotional feelings.
Judge Mayer honors himself for dealing with the juvenile delinquents that in divorce court he creates!
For the best interest of children, Judge Michael Mayer should be one of the last to be used as a juvenile judge or youth instructor or family dissolution judge?
Oct 2007 - POSITIVE FATHER motioned to take 1 or 2 children at a time. NEGATIVE action by Judge MAYER and his accomplice evaluator Beth Harrington to increase alienation and enrich court workers - denied this motion to take 1 or 2 children.
Dec 2007 - NEGATIVE action by Judge MAYER to increase alienation - Every exchange conflict and alienation was initiated by the custodian or her father, but Judge Mayer wrote in his findings of (false) 'fact' that the father was responsible for problems at exchanges and ordered visits to be done at supervision centers. As usual, Judge MAYER's facts were IMPOSSIBLE and BIZARRE because the father hadn't been at an exchange for 7 months! Judge Mayer kept changing the conditions and the consistent alienation factor that was ALWAYS present at exchanges was the custodian or her father, which is why exchanges at school without them were motioned repeatedly. These motions to remove the consistent alienating factor were always denied in NEGATIVE action by Judge MAYER which intentionally enflamed alienation and enriched the court workers. J. Mayer is well aware that there is a competition between states for billions of Federal Social Security dollars for custodian support system incentives and also for thousands of dollars of parenting time enforcement funds. The parenting time funds are diverted into these supervision centers which enflame parental alienation instead of using the funds to enforce parenting time for the majority of fathers in positive environments. The centers need judges to force customers to them so the centers can grow and use up all of the federal parenting time enforcement money in a detention center environment instead of in a park or recreation center. Or God forbid in a father's home, which Judge Michael Mayer called the 'most unnatural environment,' when he crushed Dr. Gilbertson's requests to have custody evaluation visits in the father's nice 3 bedroom townhouse for a fair evaluation. The BIZARRE thinking of Judge Michael Mayer is difficult to understand?
Apr 2008 - POSITIVE - In a letter to Judge Mayer, Dr. James GILBERTSON, approved by the court, requested his protocol to try to make his custody evaluation (secondary to Judge Mayer's accomplice) as fair as possible. NEGATIVE action by Judge MAYER increased alienation and costs and crushed most of Dr. Gilbertson's protocol requests and made it impossible to come anywhere near to a complete or fair evaluation.
Summer 2008 - NEGATIVE actions by Judge MAYER increased alienation and costs by dragging out the divorce trial to as many days as possible, taking long breaks and quitting early for Judge Mayer's personal excuses. Under trial cross-examination, Beth Harrington reluctantly agreed that taking 1 or 2 children at at time was good intuition by the (POSITIVE) FATHER. Under trial cross-examination pressure, the custodian admitted that there was never alienation in exchanges at school where only one parent was present, but she opposed this motion of the father every time and NEGATIVE Judge MAYER ruled with 1-SIDED discrimination in almost everything.
Feb 2009 - 77 page divorce decree - NEGATIVE actions by Judge MAYER increased alienation and cost - 1-SIDED discrimination, copied and pasted over 75% of lawyer Dulas' proposed decree, didn't use a single sentence from the proposed decree by the father's lawyer. NEGATIVE Judge Mayer IGNORED Dr. Gilbertson's warnings that sole custody would increase parental alienation.
May 11, 2009 - POSITIVE - In a letter to Judge Mayer, court appointed Dr. Brian POWERS warned Judge Mayer that the custodian had been delaying reunification therapy for months and he was concerned. Dr. Powers made requests regarding protocol. NEGATIVE action by Judge MAYER increased alienation and cost and crushed most of Dr. Powers requests for cooperation and resolution.
Oct 2009 - POSITIVE FATHER motioned for consequences to the custodian for continuing to sabotage reunification therapy and completely blocking any father-child therapy since Jan 2007!!! NEGATIVE action by Judge MAYER completely IGNORED giving the custodian any negative consequence. Since 2006, the custodian hasn't suffered negative consequence from 1-SIDED Judge MAYER. The court workers were enriched over $256,000 from the father and the custodian claimed court fees over $120,000 and admitted that her (millionaire) father Roger was paying her legal fees.
May 2010 Defiant NEGATIVE action by Judge MAYER ordered sole legal in a secret hearing. Mayer denied father phone access to hearing. Custodian's excuse for sole legal was that she wanted to get passports for the children for a vacation, that they never took - but she didn't need sole legal for passports, only an explanation. Instead, she used sole legal to change the children's birthnames, against the will of the older son, to put a stake in the parental alienation coffin of the father. Dr. James Gilbertson warned Judge Mayer, in 2008, against sole legal custody because it would certainly increase parental alienation, and this testimony of his was stated in the 2009 divorce decree.
Sept 2010 POSITIVE FATHER'S motions for Children's Rights for Parenting access, appoint parenting consultant, etc.
Dec 2010 POSITIVE Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) was attempted by the FATHER, and certification was mandatory per Rule 303. Father filed the required documents in court and used ADR certified Dr. Michele Millenacker in Apple Valley. Dr Millenacker made two attempts to ask the custodian to participate and cooperate. The custodian refused to participate or cooperate.
Jan 2011 - NEGATIVE action by Judge MAYER which increased alienation - ordered that it was OK for the custodian to ignore Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR). NEGATIVE J. MAYER failed to issue an order on Children's Rights to parenting and relative access and parenting consultant, etc.
Dec 2011 request for 2-way no contact order Denied - only 1-SIDED DISCRIMINATION allowed
Dec 2011 hearing NEGATIVE Mayer spoke negatively about father's attempts at ADR.
Jan 2012 NEGATIVE J. MAYER failed to issue an order on Children's Rights to parenting and relative access and parenting consultant, etc., but he illegally crushed a support modification.
Oct 2012 NEGATIVE J. MAYER again refused to remove himself.
A few of many 1-sided discrimination examples of financial grand theft and fraud by Judge Michael Mayer:
2007 Discovery. Custodian sent an extremely abusive and multiple pages of discovery request items including 3 years of all credit card statements of the father. Father provided all discovery items and even a few credit card statements that were missed, but discovered by close inspection by the custodian.
2007 Discovery. Father copied the multiple pages of discovery items requested by the custodian and sent back the same requests to the custodian. Custodian failed to provide many of the discovery items, and failed to provide even a single credit card statement! from the previous 3 years.
2008 trial. Custodian's wickedly lying lawyer Deanne Dulas merely alleged that the father hadn't completed discovery submittals. Dulas failed to provide evidence or details of what she alleged was missing. Based on Dulas' wicked lying without evidence, and
for this discovery false accusation only, Judge Michael Mayer:
1. Denied the father from submitting any evidence for trial regarding anything, that hadn't been submitted months before, yet allowing the custodian to keep submitting new evidence before and during the trial.
2. After the custodian's lying financial expert testified, denied the father's financial expert from testifying in court, and denied the evidence in those costly financial reports (over $5000 for the financial expert). There were breaks of weeks between trial dates so there were weeks of time to review the financial reports.
3. Denied the father from providing evidence of his credit card debts which grew during the divorce actions, debts which were then over $140,000.
4. Denied the mention of any of the father's debts of over $140,000 in any financial calculation or in any fairness 'balance' in the divorce judgment and decree.
5. Fined the father $1500 for the discovery delay which was a false allegation without evidence.
In other financial fraud and grand theft by Judge Michael Mayer,
6. J. Mayer merely rubber-stamped Dulas' wildly false allegation that $107,000 in home improvements were 'cosmetic' and had no legal value, therefore increasing the capital gain by $107,000 from the 1st and 2nd home in favor and prejudice for the custodian. Of course the custodian held all the home improvement receipts in her possession, since she took possession of the family home by ambush and secret divorce filing, and failed to provide these receipts in discovery.
7. Ignored $46,000 in household property taken by the custodian.
8. Ignored $42,380 in home closing costs paid by the father's employer for the home sale which was 15 months after family separation, not crediting the father, and therefore increasing the capital gain by $42,380 from the 2nd home in favor and prejudice for the custodian.
9. Ordered the father to pay of fine of $29,000 of the custodian's legal fees, falsely accusing the father of delaying the case, when all delays were to the advantage of enriching the court workers and preventing custody from changing back to equal parenting as it was before family separation.
10. Ignored 4 years where the custodian took 100% of $60,000 in child tax exemptions and deductions.
11. Ignored $6,583 in capital gains taxes paid from marital funds, which benefited the custodian's home value gain.
12. And tens of thousands in theft regarding support, ignoring the former state's support calculations and the custodian's continually false medical expense reports that fail to include insurance payment receipts.
13. In the decree financial total, based on complete fraud by Deanne Dulas, the custodian and Judge Mayer, Judge Mayer ordered the bankrupt father, in addition to $40,000+ in fines and support and medical allegations, to pay an additional $11,665 balance to the custodian who became a millionaire by grand theft by Judge Michael Mayer in court. But even this was fraud and theft of $5832, because to 'equalize' Judge Mayer's false numbers requires to award the custodian half of that amount, not all of it! This is Judge Mayer's rule of equalizing - All of the money to the woman.
Anyone who can do simple math knows that if a boy has 11 more marbles than a girl (in a fantasy world), giving the girl 11 marbles doesn't balance it equally. It then gives the girl 11 more marbles than boy. This is the only, the only failure that Judge Mayer ever admitted to in all the years on this case. And when caught, he amended the decree on this one item. Maybe Judge Mayer does this to every father to see if the father catches Judge Mayer's fraud and deception. Obviously Judge Mayer's clerk Richard Crabb copied lawyer Deanne Dulas frauds, generated more fraud and theft, participated in and supported all of these crimes against fathers. Judge Mayer is responsible for directing the crimes, and Richard Crabb was the one who made some edits to lawyer Deanne Dulas' proposed decree and had Judge Mayer sign this criminal theft action.
Judge Mayer is extremely pleased with all his NEGATIVE actions to DENY FACTS, deny COOPERATION, deny RESOLUTION and to INCREASE alienation, ENFLAME parental alienation, greatly ENRICH court workers and rule in 1-SIDED discrimination. He claims to be without bias.
___________________________________________________________________________________
And who was mostly responsible for the delays? which resulted in fining the father $29,000 for delays - delays creating ungodly enrichment of court workers. Judge Mayer please raise your hand, high in the air for everyone to see who is at fault for delays. Here is the evidence from the 2011 appellate Brief page 40:
More than 395 days of delays by Judge Mayer between hearings and his orders. Judge Mayer has consistently taken an average of 30 days after the motion to have a hearing and 80 days after a hearing to return an order when the delay punishes the father and is prejudiced in favor of the custodian. Then Judge Mayer has blamed the father for the months of delays and ordered the father to pay $29,000 in fees for his delays. Judge Mayer is severely abusive, unethical and malicious. Judge Mayer has consistently signed orders the same day or within days when quick orders are in favor and prejudice for the custodian's advantage. Judge Mayer's actions are clearly 1-sided discrimination.
Oct-5-2006 hearing, Jan-27-2007 order (100 days);
Oct-10-2007 hearing, Dec-31-2007 order (80 days),
Apr-2-2008 hearing, May-14-2007 order (41 days – issued due to impending trial);
Oct-1-2008 trial end, Feb-11-2008 decree (110 days);
Mar-30-2008 motion for amended order, Jun-3-2008 order (64 days)
= 395 days of delay by Judge Mayer
Jan-10-2010 hearing for custodian (same day order Jan-10-2010 in violation of required ADR certification);
May-6-2010 hearing for custodian (same day order May-6-2010 in violation of required ADR certification)
___________ Confession of a lawyer seeking judgeship ___________
Below are portions of the email from a judge candidate admitting the horrors created by court workers, which fortunately someone finally admits . Numerous lawyers have been disbarred after they made such admission. It would be better if he was more worried about the damage to children and fathers, than about his candidacy rating. He didn't communicate what he would do to change the crimes of "talking a good game" while the court "places children in the middle", or if he would treat men and women equally so that children can benefit the most from both of their parents.
(bold and blue fonts added)
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 20:09:33
From: seantolak@comcast.net
Hi there,
.... We always talk a good game of working for the best interests of the children, but the rules and practices really force us into a specific perspective that rivals "the other side" in front of the judge and place children in the middle. ... the way a judge manages these cases can have a profound effect on the emotional and financial cost of concluding a case.
Steve Antolak
Candidate, Hennepin County District Court Judge
If the corrupt lawyers were honest, they would admit that it is only the "practices" of 'enormous greed and narcissism' that "force us" corrupt lawyers to "place children in the middle" to gain the profound financial 'cost of concluding a case', as determined by 'the way a judge manages these cases' for the best interest of corrupt court worker enrichment. And the "rules" of 'best interest' force a destructive competitive game for profit to falsely "rival the other side in front of the judge" as to who could be a better parent.
But to children, neither parent is more important. Neither parent is more important to children. Children know and feel that they are one half mother and one half father - and missing one parent is missing one half of themselves.
So to some judges like Judge Michael Mayer, it's all 'talk a good game' using children as bait, because fathers will pay the ransom, while 'a judge manages these cases' to explode the 'profound financial cost of concluding a case,' by enflaming parental alienation with sole custody and creating permanent emotional damages to children and fathers.
Lawyer Antolak covered the key points of how these 'out of control' judges 'manage these cases' for profound financial results. As observed over the years, the court battles appear like games between lawyers. One can relate it to an NFL league where the players (the lawyers in this case) meet for the games, sometimes playing hard, sometimes not, trying to get away with as much trickery as possible, both strategy and illegally. And after each game they all shake hands, give each other hugs and run off to the bank with the money. And these incredible riches are gained in stadiums paid for by ransoming the public taxpayers, who are threatened with losing their team (or their children in the court comparison) if they don't keep paying the enormously wealthy and powerful people who have control of their team.
In citizen terms, 'profound' means "of the greatest intensity; complete".
Chief Judge Edward Lynch and the appellate court have been delighted to repeat Judge Michael Mayer's quotes which "talk a good game." Yes, as evidence repeatedly shows, Judge Michael Mayer is a profound expert at "talking a good game" of POSITIVE talk while managing the case with NEGATIVE ACTIONS "of greatest intensity" with "complete" financial and emotional costs to children and fathers.
Yes, this lawyer used the 'most fitting' word 'profound.' Certainly judges like Judge Michael Mayer who are listed on the "MN Out-of-Control Judges", 'manage these case' for "profound financial and emotional costs." Alienation and parental alienation of "greatest intensity" generated by 'a judge managing these cases' of "complete" financial and emotional destruction for the advantage of those "who talk a good game" 'of working for the best interests.'
Yes, any honorable person should have contempt for anyone who would "talk a good game" and "place children in the middle" and fight for more than an equal share of power, money and children's love. And here is the definition of contempt: a feeling that someone deserves no respect. And that is 'most fitting' for anyone in court who would manage cases or play in a game, to place children in the middle, to gain or take an unequal advantage over another person.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No appearance of impropriety?
1. The custodian failed to serve notice to the father and had a secret hearing in May 2006 to ban him from the children's school and church, based on her wild lies. The judge at the hearing was "somehow" Judge Patrice Sutherland, a former member of Deanne Lynn Dulas' law firm. Judge Sutherland would again "somehow" later be the judge on a later secret ruling. The custodian's pastors later wrote a letter to the court asking to remove the ban (and no contact order) that Sutherland ordered in the secret hearing.
2. Sometime after hiring John T. Burns as his lawyer in 2006 and finding out that "somehow" Judge Michael Mayer was assigned for the 1st hearing, and then locked in, the father found out that Judge Michael Mayer, and lawyer John T. Burns Jr. and his assistant lawyer Elizabeth M. Porter were a 3-person triathlon relay team in a recent year, and John and Judge Mayer were golfing buddies. But Elizabeth said Judge Mayer wasn't a fast enough swimmer - Judge Mayer is about the size of Napolean. You've heard of the 'Napolean complex.' Later the father found out that Judge Mayer sponsored golf parties for the Eagan Police, Mayer's former co-workers, who play the anti-father role in this case, "No, I won't read" warnings from Dr. Reitman, and "Nope, I don't care, I don't care" if she uses police to alienate, and "it's OK for police to lie." 'Exactly as the custodian wants' in helping Judge Mayer 'manage the case' 'exactly as he wants.'
3. Judge Mayer admitted 'managing the case' by talking with the Eagan chief of police. It became apparent that they and the lawyers were co-operatives with a Kids for Cash agenda - greatest intensity of financial outcomes and job security for the court-police industry 'regardless' of the greatest intensity of emotional damage to the children and against fathers. They saw a pile of money and they would make sure the system stole the greatest amount possible. The secret judge chamber meetings with lawyers should be recorded as part of the court record, or banned completely.
4. "Somehow" 2 critical police reports disappeared from the file in the previous state - one of which documented that the custodian was breaking dishes and "doing most of the screaming" and grabbing children (obtained an earlier copy), and the other one would have shown that she was secretly lying to police. Her traps and lies succeeded in her getting sole custody of the children later.
5. One of the most abusive and dishonest Eagan police officers is a huge man Mike Anderson, and the father had called in a complaint on him. The next year, senior officer Mike Anderson repeatedly refused to talk with Dr. Reitman on the phone during a child exchange that the custodian didn't want to do on Thanksgiving weekend. The other officer lied to Dr. Reitman on the phone and Mike Anderson took serious revenge (for the complaint) and also violated police procedure. But his lies and the tampering of the audio recording would cover-up for him. It was Mike (Michael) Anderson who "somehow" arrived for this trap of lies set up by the custodian (and likely from Deanne Dulas' dirty bag of tricks) and carried out the most malicious abuse by an Eagan police officer. Later, when the father requested the total number of complaints filed on Eagan officers, senior officer Linda Myhre had complaints, but "somehow" the complaints for senior officer Michael Anderson had disappeared.
6. The children were trained by the custodian to call 911 or go the the neighbor if one of them wanted to go home to her. The father overheard two of the children coordinating plans to call 911 from an amusement park and asked them what they were doing. Certainly it would have made a huge impact in this child custody case to have a police record of a father losing track of children in an amusement park, and them calling 911. The children would occasionally refuse to get out of the car sometimes, even when they were told that they could pick out something for themselves for Dad to buy for them. They had been trained that they were in charge, and their father could do nothing. On another day, one neighbor was helping to get the children into the car, and one son yelled out 'help' to a black youth on an upper balcony who secretly called the police, and secretly gave a report and never talked to the father to find out what was going on before or after - never talked to the father. The other children ran through the large apartment complex so they would be "lost" when the police arrived. Dr. Reitman confirmed that the custodian continued to set the father up (in ways that he didn't anticipate).
7. But Judge Mayer had no negative consequences for the custodian and continued with his Kids for Cash agenda. And the #1 objective of the Burns' office was also to make as much money as possible. Elizabeth Porter admitted having no conscience for charging 3 times as much time as she spent, because she charged a minimum fee for every little task or portion of task (like a car mechanic) and not by time spent. Her incoming messages cut off at 2 minutes and she charged 10 or 15 minutes for every message or page of email to her. On Mar. 23, 2007 (audio evidence) John Burns said that Judge Mayer needed to be removed for breaking state law 518.175 by failing to hold evidentiary hearings when restricting parenting time significantly (twice at that point) based on wild lies of Deanne Dulas. But Burns avoided a court challenge of the illegal actions of his golf and triathlon buddy Judge Mayer and avoided making a request to remove him, and Burns was let go as lawyer.
8. Later, a father's advocate lawyer, purposely hired from a different county to ask for Judge Mayer's removal, did a good cross-examination of Judge Mayer's fraudulent evaluator Beth Harrington, but cut out a lot of the hard evidence when asking for the recusal of Judge Mayer, and admitted that he was worried more about his reputation if he succeeded in removing a judge. On his last day, 7 months after both lawyers and Judge Mayer dragged out the divorce trial to 13 days for the greatest intensity of financial outcome for both lawyers (and possible back-door or judge chamber contributions), he said that he didn't care about the children, it was just "business" for him.
9. Most of the parenting times were good and positive and there were pictures and videos and witnesses in court to prove this, but none of that mattered to Judge Mayer. There were some times that were difficult. The exchanges with the presence of the custodian or her father Roger were often horrible - she would walk to the father's car, harass the father who stayed in his car for his safety, to avoid being pulled into her conflict and she would wimper for the children to stay with her.
10. One time, the custodian assaulted the father's sister by grabbing and shoving her almost to the ground and taking one child with her during the father's parenting time - a police report was filed later, but the police said 'too late.'
11. The custodian and her father always demanded that the children go into the police station lobby, instead of exchanging in the parking lot as Judge Mayer previously mentioned in court. In the lobby, they would perform in front of the camera, and the custodian or Roger would loiter and stalk the father for a while, hoping one or all children would decide to return with them. There is a video of one time. Later Judge Mayer banned the father from gathering audio or video evidence of the children. The father brought a friend as a witness, and Roger again demanded that the children and he had to go into the police station lobby (instead of in the parking lot) for an exchange (stalking, and performance), but Roger repeatedly refused to say why he demanded the lobby instead of the parking lot. Then Roger assaulted the father by shoving him. The Eagan police failed to turn over the police station video, and threatened the father not to contact the other witnesses who were teenage police (want-to-be) 'Explorers.' Lawyer Deanne Dulas lied the way out of that one and trained these Explorer teenagers, who she had sole access to before the hearing, to lie and perform in court (good practice for a future cop?), and they denied the push aside, which they had admitted in the police report! Roger was her star at lying under oath. Roger also denied things that he admitted on the police report like 'pushing out of the way'. The father was without a lawyer and the judge refused to accept the police report as evidence (amazing!) and let Roger go without any consequences.
The custodian and her lawyer father Roger and Judge Michael Mayer have experienced complete immunity to use their power to violate orders, harass, assault and abuse.
---
After the exchanges, it usually took a good amount of time for the custodian and Roger's "influence to wear off" before things went well, and the time right before returning the children was difficult at times. This was most apparent one time in 2006 with $200/hr lawyer expeditor Eric Rehm as a parenting time witness - The children weren't well behaved after the exchange from the custodian - All (without the custodian) went to a bowling alley, they played in front of a crazy mirror in the entrance, and in an instant, the children forgot about the custodian, like flipping a light switch, and things went much better.
12. The longer the visits in the father's home, the better it went. But the malicious Beth Harrington, decided to make the visits as short as possible, and as difficult as possible for relatives, with 4 hours on Saturday and 4 hours on Sunday but only on alternate weekends, with relatives to do the exchanges by driving hours round trip, with 4 exchanges! (dropoff/pickup/dropoff/pickup) per weekend at the police station! with the custodian or Roger present! instead of exchanges with only one parent present at school, which was never a problem. And later Judge Mayer's accomplice Harrington decided to reduce visits to 2 hours on alternate weekends at a supervision center. And in a short time, the parental alienation was complete and permanent and all visits ended. Mayer and Harrington's methodology was the opposite of the proven better situation of longer parenting times and absence of the custodian or her father at exchanges. And the emotional and financial effects of their methodology and 'managing the case' were of the greatest intensity.
13. The fraudulent Beth Harrington charged $14,312. $11,032 for the custody evaluation + $3280 for an estimated 4 hours of court prep and less than 4 hours of court testimony = $400/hour x 8 for court prep and testimony. Before Harrington was in the court, Judge Mayer forced the father to write out the last $1500 check for Judge Mayer's accomplice Harrington in the courtroom and write the check payable to lawyer Deanne Dulas or the father would forfeit the chance for his witnesses to be heard in court.
14. But Judge Mayer said one thing and did the opposite. Judge Mayer still denied the father from using his financial expert by repeating Deanne Dulas' lying generalization that the father's discovery wasn't complete months before. 1-sided discrimination was the rule.
15. Harrington was forced onto this case by Judge Michael Mayer, who refused repeatedly to choose a different evaluator after Dr. Reitman warned the father, "I think you're being set up to go to Harrington," Dr. Reitman said he thinks Judge Mayer "is a contaminated judge, and he's picking somebody that he probably knows will do exactly what he wants. It feels abusive, it feels like an abuse of power, and I think that you need to say no."
Rev 3:19 As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten. Therefore be zealous and repent.
2 Cor 7:10 For godly sorrow produces repentance leading to salvation, not to be regretted; but the sorrow of the world produces death.
John 3:36 He who believes in the Son has everlasting life; and he who does not believe the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him.”
Matthew 5:23-24 Therefore if you bring your gift to the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, 24 leave your gift there before the altar, and go your way. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift.
Matt 3:7-8 But when he saw many of the Pharisees {lawyers} and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, “Brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 8 Therefore bear fruits worthy of repentance
Heb 6:4-6 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 if they fall away, to renew them again to repentance, since they crucify again for themselves the Son of God, and put Him to an open shame.
Heb 10:26-27 For if we sin willfully after we have received the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, 27 but a certain fearful expectation of judgment, and fiery indignation which will devour the adversaries
--
Matt 22:14 For many are called, but few are chosen.
Matt 7:21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven.
Luke 6:46 “But why do you call Me ‘Lord, Lord,’ and not do the things which I say?
John 15:14 You are My friends if you do whatever I command you.
John 8:31-32 Then Jesus said to those Jews who believed Him, “If you abide in My word, you are My disciples indeed. And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”