This site is maintained and posted by a third person. No content on this site may be copied without permission.
The "Blocking calls - recordings" below are further evidence of the parental alienation by the custodian that Judge Michael Mayer, Beth Painter Harrington, Brent Baumler and Judge Edward Lynch knowingly support, encourage and enflame since 2006.
Audios are at the end of this page.
The father prays that someone hears this evidence and creates consequences for the custodian so that she will get help for herself and will share these precious children with their father and paternal relatives. She can't be ordered to therapy, that's not how it works. She must suffer consequences that force her to seek help herself. She has interfered and prevented all father-child and paternal relative phone conversations with the children since August, while she puts on an award winning performance of deception to the court and police.
The safety of the father is of critical importance because the custodian lies to the police and to the court and Judge Michael Mayer has a public history record of abusing his power in malicious revenge against those (like the father) who provide evidence of Judge Mayer's failures and abuses of power. The custodian is a millionaire through grand theft in Judge Mayer's court and makes over $130,000 a year working parttime. The custodian's father Roger is a millionaire who paid her legal fees. They have more money than they will ever need. The custodian's desire to get the father and punish him is like a psychopathic desire, the pleasure of hurting someone by abusing the use of government power. The intent and actions taken to make false arrest are documented at this link: 5c. DISHONORABLE Judge Mayer and Eagan Police, custodian - INTENT to abuse and make false arrest Disturbed people gain the advantage in court - false allegations 2.5 min. video - Dr. Jayne Major, parental alienation researcher
The custodian's hysterical lying is award winning deception and brainwashing. No allegations against the father of harm were made since 2007, the custodian's false allegations of harm or needing protection were false and her lies to child protection resulted only in their recommendations to have father-child therapy which the custodian has done everything to block since Jan. 2007 and before. She knew that father-child therapy would be successful again, so she is obsessed to block it. The 2009 decree confirmed on p.8, finding 53. "Respondent was not a domestic abuser and did not commit domestic abuse either on Petitioner or children." Judge Mayer told the lawyers in his secret quarters that the custodian's stories {together with Deanne Dulas many lies} made him believe that things were much worse than they really were. {The fantastic 'stories' were Judge Mayer's excuse to take severe actions, and then he let them remain as revenge against the father}. Judge Mayer stated publicly that the domestic complaints in custody trial, asking the custodian "is that true?" which she interpreted as "you're a liar" {her psych tests prove her hysterical compulsive lying behavior}, unknowingly asking can you wear that party dress? which she misinterpreted into "you're fat", a scratch on a child, custodian throwing and breaking things, and arguing, were quite minor compared to other divorce cases. However, the children had serious injuries, broken arm, bashed head etc. during the custodian's parenting time and she spun the minivan 360 degrees in an accident with her dangerous driving and fortunately the children survived. But the domestic false allegation industry keeps screaming their theme song "harm" against fathers. And screaming by the custodian especially, even 5 years after her last false allegation of harm. False hysterical whining and crying is all the police want before they take action.
As with most child custody cases, this IS THE ORDER on this case regarding contact with children:
Appendix A VI-D. "Each party has the right of reasonable access and telephone contact with the minor children."
There are no restrictions on telephone contact with the children. There is no restriction on video calls. There is no restriction on 'reasonable access' via email or by any kind of computer communication or multi-user games. Yet the custodian has brainwashed the children for years to falsely believe that any computer based contact is prohibited by "judge's order", and that explains why the children have never responded to computer messages in all the years. The custodian stated "you can talk to them" (blocking calls - recording 3) and then later the custodian changed her mind and brainwashed the children to falsely believe that phone contact is prohibited until after reunification therapy (when she has single-handedly blocked all father-child therapy since Jan 2007). She brainwashes that the father is breaking "judge's orders" by calling on the phone, which she approved in recording 3! And for years Judge Mayer knowingly ignores her brainwashing, parental alienation and her violations of his court orders. Judge Mayer blocks and disposes of as much evidence from the father as possible and Judge Lynch continually states that he will not 'interfere' with {corrupt} judges under him.
The custodian blocked all father-child therapy since Jan. 2007. The custodian has done everything she possibly can to prevent father-child reunification therapy - any claim otherwise or indicating she wants reunification therapy is a very wicked brainwashing lie. First reunification was blocked by her pressuring Brent Baumler to follow her orders. Later, Dr. Powers became involved and repeatedly stated that he would try to get permission from the custodian to do father-child therapy, but the custodian pressured Dr. Brian Powers to make an agreement with her of no father-child therapy and Dr. Powers quit soon after. See the Dr. Powers recordings at this link Exhibit E1 - the custodian forced Dr. Powers to an "agreement" of no father-child therapy Dr. Powers stated "I was afraid that she would think I was setting her up .. for the father to see the kids."
The custodian's claims in front of the children of wanting reunification are pure fantasy and truly exceptional parental alienation and brainwashing.
Nobody does it better?
In Blocking calls - recording 5, the custodian clearly communicates again her parental alienation agenda since Day 1, "I will not trust you people with my children. When they are 18, they will decide what they will do." Until age 18 she will continue to brainwash and try to make the parental alienation unbreakable and inescapable lifelong, unless the court or church take positive action now. This is exactly as Dr. Paul Reitman warned Judge Mayer in emails in November 2006 and in Dr. Reitman's addendum in Feb 2007, all warning which Judge Michael Mayer rejected.
Grandiosity is the diagnostic hallmark of pathological narcissism. Narcissists are very reluctant to open up and trust. Narcissists have a pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy. (narcissistic behaviors matches are in parentheses in the transcripts below).
LISTEN TO THE RECORDINGS BELOW.
Beeps are recorded in place of the names of the children and the father's family. No family last name is on any recording posted online.
You can tell who is the abuser - the custodian - who uses abusive words to people's faces.
Many of her abusive allegations are the opposite of what she says - and actually describe herself - hypocrite, you do not care about those kids, put my children into harm, put them into an environment of harm, etc.
Partial transcript of recordings:
Blocking calls - recording 1
5 (father) we can do video (no order restricting computer access)
20 (custodian) reunification therapy (first) (false brainwashing in front of children)
20 (custodian) you're crossing the line BUDDY (abusive words BUDDY, false allegation)
Blocking calls - recording 2
8 the order is reunification therapy SIR (abusive words, disingenuous SIR, haughty)
(custodian lying, brainwashing in front of children - there is no order restricting phone or computer contact)
Blocking calls - recording 3
9 cut it out, you can talk to them,
computer contact with you guys, no computer related,
that's not the order, that's not the judge's order (custodian lying, brainwashing in front of children, (using grandiosity 'judge's order')
Blocking calls - recording 4
If you call one more time I'm going to call police (using grandiosity 'police' threat)
You called 4 times today (in her '4 times today', the custodian counts the initial calls that they don't pick up. Her method of counting satisfies the police - which she knows)
Blocking calls - recording 5
blocking the children's aunt from talking with the children
10 (aunt) could I talk to the kids?
15 you tried to harm (she continues her vague false allegations even though the decree confirms no domestic abuse)
25 you want to play nicey nice (abusive words, lack of empathy)
40 (aunt) I don't understand what you are talking about
45 you are clueless (abusive name-calling)
SHE CLEARLY COMMUNICATES HER AGENDA SINCE DAY 1
50 I will not trust you people with my children, (lack of trust)
when they are 18, they will decide what they will do (grandiosity)
100 you tried to put my children into harm (false exaggeration, grandiosity, lack of trust)
105 I will protect those children (grandiosity, I'm special, lack of trust)
115 you owe me a huge apology, you owe those kids an apology (grandiosity, I'm special)
120 what do you want!
120 (aunt) I'd like to have a friendly conversation
120 you want to pretend to care about those kids
120 you do not care about those kids! (abusive words, false, brainwasher words)
you do not care about those children! (abusive words)
130 I'll tell you who loves those children, I do! (grandiosity, need for admiration, I'm special)
130 you're a bunch of hypocrites! (abusive words)
135 a polite conversation. Quit calling my home!
150 (aunt) I can't talk to your children
210 (aunt) I don't know what's going on in their lives
225 living in mommy and daddy's house (abusive words, child tone, lack empathy)
225 (aunt) do they have time to talk with him?
225 (aunt) do they have time to talk with him?
230 (aunt) he would love to talk with them
245 children who are young adults (all are 16 and under) (exaggeration, grandiosity, need admiration)
245 who I'm very proud of (need for admiration for raising kids she's proud)
245 (aunt) it's pretty hard when you can't have any conversation with any of the children
305 you bet it matters, you bet it matters (haughty tone)
305 her trademark wicked, haughty laugh of exhaled air (abusive, wicked laugh of pleasure)
320 you won't tell (in abusive childish tone)
345 I called to talk to your children
355 you tried to put them into an environment of harm (false exaggeration, grandiosity, lack of trust)
400 you have no legal right (grandiosity, I'm special)
Blocking calls - recording 6
blocking the children's aunt from talking with the children
110 you are harassing me now, you're going on to harassing me (histrionic grandiosity)
115 Don't mess with me! Don't call my home (arrogant,contemptous, exaggerated self-importance)
120 what did you mean by harm? - no response
Blocking calls - recording 7
custodian revealing her false fantasy order 'reunification before phone contact', which she has brainwashed into the children months before. In her mind, reunification is "you are supposed to go". Listen to her words. In her fantasy mind, reunification doesn't include father-child therapy. But she brainwashes the children to believe she wants father-child reunification therapy and it's all the father's fault, and the father is breaking {her fantasy} court order.
15 you're supposed to go to a reunification therapist (brainwashing children to believe that she wants reunification therapy when she maliciously delayed and blocked all father-child therapy since Jan 2007. And Judge Mayer failed to give the psychologists authority to do their jobs and denied their protocols)
20 you're breaking the order (in front of children) (lying, alienating in front of the children)
The orders do have not restricted phone calls, email or computer contact with the children. The custodian is again breaking court orders, which Judge Mayer ignores, and the father has a right to communicate with his children.
from http://www.halcyon.com/jmashmun/npd/dsm-iv.html
It has also been suggested that self-help literature about bolstering self-esteem and getting what you want out of life or that encourages the feeling of victimization has aggravating effects on narcissistic thinking and behavior.
-- Most clinical writers seem unaware that narcissists' self-reports are unreliable. This is troubling, considering that lying is the most common complaint about narcissists and that, in many instances, defects of empathy lead narcissists to wildly inaccurate misinterpretations of other people's speech and actions, so that they may believe that they are liked and respected despite a history of callous and exploitative personal interactions.
Purely anecdotal evidence from correspondents and from observations of people I know indicates that selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors, such as Prozac, aggravate narcissists' grandiosity and lack of social inhibition.
DSM-IV criteria for Narcissism
1. An exaggerated sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements) (Grandiosity)
2. Preoccupation with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
Translation: Narcissists live in their own little worlds (and react when reality dares to intrude).
3. Believes she is "special" and can only be understood by or should associate with other special or high-status people (judges, police)
4. Requires excessive admiration
5. Has a sense of entitlement
6. Selfishly takes advantage of others to achieve her own ends
7. Lacks empathy
9. Shows arrogant, haughty, patronizing, or contemptuous behaviors or attitudes
Translation: They treat other people like dirt.
Borderline Personality is similar to Narcissism and affects more women than men.
The hallmark diagnostic of Borderline Personality is fear of abandonment.
Is this case it is the custodian's severe fear of abandonment by the children and/or by the custodian's father. When all the children had bikes and skiis and were enjoying these activities with the father, the mother secretly filed for divorce. This was the sure way for her to stay #1 in the children's lives and eliminate the competition. Wanting to have another child with the father in the few months before she filed for divorce (as her father Roger demanded) was another sign of this severe need to have someone clinging to her. And witnesses described the inappropriate way that Roger clings to her.