Desenho de Pesquisa
Programa das aulas [GOOGLE DRIVE - Literatura]
1. Pesquisa Causal. Teorias e Conceitos (18/02)
KELLSTEDT, Paul M. e WHITTEN, Guy D. Fundamentos da Pesquisa em Ciência Política. São Paulo: Blucher, 2015. Caps 1 e 2;
Discussão:
SUTTON, Robert I.; STAW, Barry M. What theory is not. Administrative science quarterly, p. 371-384, 1995.
Leitura Complementar:
KING, Gary; KEOHANE, Robert O.; VERBA, Sidney. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton university press, 1994; Cap. 1
2. Desenho de Pesquisa (03/03)
KELLSTEDT, Paul M. e WHITTEN, Guy D. Fundamentos da Pesquisa em Ciência Política. São Paulo: Blucher, 2015. Caps 3 e 4;
TOSHKOV, D., 2018. Research Design, in: Lowndes, V., Marsh, D., Stoker, G. (Eds.), Theory and Methods in Political Science. Palgrave, London, pp. 219–236. Cap. 13
Discussão:
BANERJEE, Abhijit V., Rema HANNA, Gabriel E. KREINDLER, and Benjamin A. OLKEN. "Debunking the stereotype of the lazy welfare recipient: Evidence from cash transfer programs." The World Bank Research Observer 32, no. 2 (2017): 155-184.
Leitura Complementar:
ANGRIST, Joshua e PISCHKE, Jorn-Steffen. Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's companion. Princeton university press, 2008. Questions about Questions e The experimental ideal Caps 1 e 2.
3. Conceituação, Mensuração e Tipos de Variáveis (10/03)
KELLSTEDT, Paul M. e WHITTEN, Guy D. Fundamentos da Pesquisa em Ciência Política. São Paulo: Blucher, 2015. Cap.5
CARMINES, Edward G.; ZELLER, Richard A. Reliability and validity assessment. Sage publications, 1979. - Cap 1 e 2
Discussão:
ELKINS, Zachary. "Gradations of democracy? Empirical tests of alternative conceptualizations." American Journal of Political Science (2000): 293-300.
SUTTON, Robert I.; STAW, Barry M. What theory is not. Administrative science quarterly, p. 371-384, 1995.
Leitura Complementar:
CARMINES, Edward G.; ZELLER, Richard A. Reliability and validity assessment. Sage publications, 1979.. Cap 3 e 4
4. Inferência descritiva e inferência causal (17/03)
KING, Gary, KEOHANE, Robert Keohane and VERVA, Sidney. 1994. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Cap. 2 e Cap. 3, pp. 55-62 e 75-96.
BRADY, Henry and COLLIER, David. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Cap. 1 e Cap. 2, pp. 03-35.
Discussão:
PAPE, Robert A. "The strategic logic of suicide terrorism." American political science review. 97, no. 3 (2003): 343-361.
ASHWORTH, S, J. CCLINTON, A. MEIROWITS, and K. RAMSEY, “Design, Inference, and the Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism,” American Political Science Review, 2008, pp. 269-274
PAPE, Robert A, “Methods and Findings in the Study of Suicide Terrorism,” American Political Science Review, 2008, pp. 275-277
Leitura Complementar:
GOERTZ, Gary and MAHONEY, James. 2012. A Tale of Two Cultures: qualitative and quantitative research in the social sciences. Cap. 1 e 2, pp. 1-40; Cap. 8, pp. 100-114; Cap. 10 e 11, pp. 127-149.
5. Viés de Seleção e Viés de Variável Omitida (24/03)
COLLIER, David; MAHONEY, James. Insights and pitfalls: Selection bias in qualitative research. World Politics, v. 49, n. 1, p. 56-91, 1996.
GEDDES, Barbara. How the cases you choose affect the answers you get: Selection bias in comparative politics. Political analysis, v. 2, p. 131-150, 1990.
SEAWRIGHT, Jason and GERRING, John. 2008. Case-Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly Vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 294-308.
Leitura Complementar:
KING, Gary; KEOHANE, Robert O.; VERBA, Sidney. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton university press, 1994; Cap. 4 e 5.
6. Estudos de Caso I (31/03)
TOSHKOV, Dimiter. 2016. Research Design in Political Science. 1st ed. 2016 edition. London New York, NY: Palgrave. Capítulo 10 (Single-Case Study Designs)
GERRING, John. 2008. “Case Selection for Case‐Study Analysis: Qualitative and Quantitative Techniques.” The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology.
Leitura Complementar:
ELSTER, Jon. Peças e Engrenagens das Ciências Sociais. Relume Dumará. 1994.
7. Estudo de Caso II (Process Tracing) (07/04)
CUNHA, Eleonora Schettini Martins, and Carmem E. Leitão Araújo. 2018. Process tracing nas Ciências Sociais: fundamentos e aplicabilidade. http://repositorio.enap.gov.br/jspui/handle/1/3328
MAILLET, Antoine, and Sebastián Carrasco. 2019. “Regulação e poder de negócios: o caso do transporte público em Santiago (2007-2017).” Revista de Administração Pública 53(5): 942–59.
RUIJER, Erna et al. 2020. “The Politics of Open Government Data: Understanding Organizational Responses to Pressure for More Transparency.” The American Review of Public Administration 50(3): 260–74.
Leitura Complementar:
GEORGE, Alexander and BENNET, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cap. 10, pp. 205-232.
ELSTER, Jon. Peças e Engrenagens das Ciências Sociais. Relume Dumará. 1994.
8. Estudos Observacionais com N-grande (14/04)
TOSHKOV, Dimiter. 2016. Research Design in Political Science. 1st ed. 2016 edition. London New York, NY: Palgrave. Capítulo 8 (Large-N Designs)
MENEZES-FILHO, Naércio, and Elaine Pazello. 2007. “Do Teachers’ Wages Matter for Proficiency? Evidence from a Funding Reform in Brazil.” Economics of Education Review 26(6): 660–72.
AKIBA, Motoko, Yu-Lun Chiu, Kazuhiko Shimizu, and Guodong Liang. 2012. “Teacher Salary and National Achievement: A Cross-National Analysis of 30 Countries.” International Journal of Educational Research 53: 171–81.
Complementar:
COLLIER, David. “The Comparative Method”, in Finifter (ed), Political Science: The State of the Discipline II. Washington, D.C.: APSA. Pp. 113-119. 1993.
9. Estudos Experimentais 1 – Experimentos de Campo (21/04)
KRAFT, Matthew A., and Shaun M. Dougherty. 2013. “The Effect of Teacher–Family Communication on Student Engagement: Evidence From a Randomized Field Experiment.” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 6(3): 199–222.
KARRUZ, Ana, and Ana Karruz. 2018. “Oferta, Demanda e Nota de Corte: Experimento Natural sobre Efeitos da Lei das Cotas no Acesso à Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.” Dados 61(2): 405–62.
CEPALUNI, Gabriel, and F. Daniel Hidalgo. 2016. “Compulsory Voting Can Increase Political Inequality: Evidence from Brazil.” Political Analysis 24(2): 273–80.
Complementar:
MURALIDHARAN, Karthik, and Nishith Prakash. 2017. “Cycling to School: Increasing Secondary School Enrollment for Girls in India.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 9(3): 321–50.
10. Estudos Experimentais e Mixed Designs(28/04)
John, Peter, and Toby Blume. 2018. “How Best to Nudge Taxpayers? The Impact of Message Simplification and Descriptive Social Norms on Payment Rates in a Central London Local Authority.” Journal of Behavioral Public Administration 1(1).
Guimaraes, Feliciano Sá de, Flavio Pinheiro, and Ivan Fernandes. 2020. “Prejudice Towards Internal And Foreign Migration: Combining List And Endorsement Experiments In Brazil.” In Honolulu, Hawaii / USA.
10.1 Mixed Designs
Toshkov, Dimiter. 2016. Research Design in Political Science. 1st ed. 2016 edition. London New York, NY: Palgrave. Capítulo 11 (Mixed and Nested Designs)
Seawright, Jason. 2016. “Better Multimethod Design:The Promise of Integrative Multimethod Research.” Security Studies 25(1): 42–49.
Seawright, Jason. 2016. Multi-Method Social Science: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Tools. Cambridge University Press. [não obrigatório]