Desenho de Pesquisa

Programa das aulas [GOOGLE DRIVE - Literatura]

Programa das aulas:  * Programa e leituras sujeitas à alterações

Introdução: Apresentação do Programa (02/06)

KING, Gary. 2020. “So You're a Grad Student Now? Maybe You Should Do This.” In The SAGE Handbook of Research Methods in Political Science and International Relations. Copy at https://tinyurl.com/y9tev63a

WEINGAST, Barry R. Caltech rules for writing papers: how to structure your paper and write an introduction. 2010.

PINHEIRO. Flávio. Estrategia para Leitura de Artigos Científicos. Mimeo. 2021 

1.     Pesquisa Causal. Teorias e Conceitos (09/06)

KELLSTEDT, Paul M. e WHITTEN, Guy D. Fundamentos da Pesquisa em Ciência Política. São Paulo: Blucher, 2015. Caps 1 (Estudo científico da Política) e 2 (A arte de construção de teorias) * disponível em inglês

TOSHKOV, Dimiter. Research Design in Political Science. Cap 3. (Theory in the Research Process).

Discussão:

SUTTON, Robert I.; STAW, Barry M. What theory is not. Administrative science quarterly, p. 371-384, 1995.

Leitura Complementar:

KING, Gary; KEOHANE, Robert O.; VERBA, Sidney. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press, 1994; Cap. 1 (The Science in Social Science).

2.     Pergunta e Desenho de Pesquisa (16/06)

ANGRIST, Joshua e PISCHKE, Jorn-Steffen. Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's companion. Princeton University Press, 2008. Cap. 1 (Questions about Questions) e Cap 2 (The experimental ideal) Caps 1 e 2.

KELLSTEDT, Paul M. e WHITTEN, Guy D. Fundamentos da Pesquisa em Ciência Política. São Paulo: Blucher, 2015. Caps 3 (Avaliando Relações Causais) e 4 (Desenho de Pesquisa);

Discussão:

J. Wand, K. Shotts, J. Sekhon, W. Mebane, M. Herron, and H. Brady, “The Butterfly Did It:  The Aberrant Vote for Buchanan in Palm Beach County, Florida,” American Political Science Review, 2001, pp. 793-810

Leitura Complementar:

TOSHKOV, D., 2018. Research Design, in: Lowndes, V., Marsh, D., Stoker, G. (Eds.), Theory and Methods in Political Science. Palgrave, London, pp. 219–236. Cap. 13 (What is research design?)

3.     Causalidade e Explicação (23/06)

MUMFORD, Stephen; ANJUM Rani Lill. Causation: a very short introduction. OUP Oxford, 2013.

FEARON, James D. Counterfactuals and hypothesis testing in political science. World Politics, 43(2):169–195, 1991.

Discussão:

PAPE, Robert A. "The strategic logic of suicide terrorism." American political science review. 97, no. 3 (2003): 343-361.

ASHWORTH, S, J. CCLINTON, A. MEIROWITS, and K. RAMSEY, “Design, Inference, and the Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism,” American Political Science Review, 2008, pp. 269-274

PAPE, Robert A, “Methods and Findings in the Study of Suicide Terrorism,” American Political  Science Review, 2008, pp. 275-277

Leitura Complementar:

GARFINKEL, Alan, Forms of Explanation. Rethinking the Questions in Social Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1981– Introduction.

SCRIVEN, Michael (1975). Causation as explanation. Noûs 9 (1):3-16.

4.     Inferência descritiva e inferência causal (30/06)

KING, Gary, KEOHANE, Robert Keohane and VERVA, Sidney. 1994. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Cap. 2 e Cap. 3, pp. 55-62 e 75-96. (Descriptive Inference e Causality and Causal Inference)

BRADY, Henry and COLLIER, David. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Part A – Framing the Debate  - Cap. 1: Refocusing the Discussion of Methodology e Cap. 2: The Ques for Standards: King, Keohane and Verba´s Designing Social Inquiry, pp. 03-35.

Discussão:

BANERJEE, Abhijit V., Rema HANNA, Gabriel E. KREINDLER, and Benjamin A. OLKEN. "Debunking the stereotype of the lazy welfare recipient: Evidence from cash transfer programs." The World Bank Research Observer 32, no. 2 (2017): 155-184.

Leitura Complementar:

GOERTZ, Gary and MAHONEY, James. 2012. A Tale of Two Cultures: qualitative and quantitative research in the social sciences. Cap. 1. Introduction

 Não haverá aula no dia 14/07

5.     Pluralismo inferêncial (28/07)

GOERTZ, Gary and MAHONEY, James. 2012. A Tale of Two Cultures: qualitative and quantitative research in the social sciences. Parte II Caps 7 – 9: Within-Case Analysis

MAHONEY, James. 2010. “After KKV The New Methodology of Qualitative Research”, World Politics, Vol. 62, No. 01, pp. 120-47.

Discussão:

REZENDE, F. C.. Methodological Transformations in Contemporary Political Science. REVISTA POLÍTICA HOJE, v. 30, p. 1-42, 2021.

Leitura Complementar:

ELSTER, Jon. Peças e Engrenagens das Ciências Sociais. Relume Dumará. 1994.* [ELSTER, Jon. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.]

6.     Conceituação, Mensuração e Tipos de Variáveis (04/08)

KELLSTEDT, Paul M. e WHITTEN, Guy D. Fundamentos da Pesquisa em Ciência Política. São Paulo: Blucher, 2015. Cap.5 (Conhecendo seus dados. Avaliando Mensurações e Variações)

TOSHKOV, Dimiter. Research Design in Political Science. Cap 4. (Concepts and Operationalization).

Discussão:

ELKINS, Zachary. "Gradations of democracy? Empirical tests of alternative conceptualizations." American Journal of Political Science (2000): 293-300.

SOIFER. Hillel David. Measuring State Capacity in Contemporary Latin America. Revista de Ciencia Política / volumen 32 / Nº 3 / 2012 / 585 – 598

Leitura Complementar:

CARMINES, Edward G.; ZELLER, Richard A. Reliability and validity assessment. Sage publications, 1979.. Cap 1 a 4

7.     Process Tracing (04/08)

BEACH, Derek and PEDERSEN, Rasmus. 2013. Process-Tracing Methods: foundations and guidelines. Cap. 01 e 02, pp. 01-22.

COLLIER, David. 2011. Understanding Process Tracing. Political Science and Politics, Vol. 44, No. 04, pp. 823-830.

Discussão:

Ruijer, Erna et al. 2020. “The Politics of Open Government Data: Understanding Organizational Responses to Pressure for More Transparency.” The American Review of Public Administration 50(3): 260–74.

Leitura Complementar:

WALDNER, David. Process tracing and qualitative causal inference. Security Studies, v. 24, n. 2, p. 239-250, 2015

GEORGE, Alexander and BENNET, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cap. 10, pp. 205-232. (Process Tracing and Historial Explanation).

Cunha, Eleonora Schettini Martins, and Carmem E. Leitão Araújo. 2018. Process tracing nas Ciências Sociais: fundamentos e aplicabilidade

http://repositorio.enap.gov.br/jspui/handle/1/3328

8. Viés de Seleção e Viés de Variável Omitida (11/08)

KING, Gary; KEOHANE, Robert O.; VERBA, Sidney. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton university press, 1994; Cap. 4 e 5. (Determining What to Observe & Understanding What to Avoid).

COLLIER, David; MAHONEY, James. Insights and pitfalls: Selection bias in qualitative research. World Politics, v. 49, n. 1, p. 56-91, 1996.

Discussão:

GEDDES, Barbara. How the cases you choose affect the answers you get: Selection bias in comparative politics. Political analysis, v. 2, p. 131-150, 1990.

Textos auxiliares:

SEAWRIGHT, Jason and GERRING, John. 2008. Case-Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly Vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 294-308.

GERRING, John; COJOCARU, Lee. Selecting cases for intensive analysis: A diversity of goals and methods. Sociological methods & research, v. 45, n. 3, p. 392-423, 2016.

9.     Método comparado (18/08)

LIJPHART, Arend. 1971. Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. American Political Science Review, No. 65, pp. 682-693.

CLARK, William Roberts, Matt GOLDER, and Sona NADENICHEK Golder. 2012. Principles of Comparative Politics. CQ Press. Capítulos 1 a 2 {principalmente 2}.

Discussão:

IMMERGUT, Ellen M. As regras do jogo: a lógica da política de saúde na França, na Suíça e na Suécia. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, v. 30, n. 11, p. 139-163, 1996. [IMMERGUT, Ellen M. The rules of the game: The logic of health policy-making in France, Switzerland, and Sweden. Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis, v. 4, n. 4, p. 57-89, 1992.]

Complementar:

FERNANDES, IVAN FILIPE; CADAH, L. Q. . Metodologia em Pesquisa Comparada: Passado e Presente. In: Ivan Filipe Fernandes. (Org.). Desafios metodológicos das políticas públicas baseadas em evidências.. 1ed.Boa Vista: IOLE Editora, 2022, v. 1, p. 195-226.

PRZEWORSKI, Adam. Is the Science of Comparative Politics Possible?. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford University Press, 2009.

10.     Estudos Experimentais 1 – Experimentos de Survey (25/08)

Toshkov, Dimiter. 2016. Research Design in Political Science. 1st ed. 2016 edition. London New York, NY: Palgrave.   Capítulo 7 (Experimental Designs)

B. Gaines, J. Kuklinski, and P. Quirk, “The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined,” Political Analysis, 2007, pp. 1-20

Discussão:

GUIMARÃES, Feliciano de Sá; FERNANDES, Ivan Filipe. Analyzing prejudice against immigrants in sending countries: The Brazilian case. Latin American Policy, v. 15, n. 3, p. 423-459, 2024.

Complementar:

Druckman, James N.,  Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur. 2006. “The Growth and Development of Experimental Research in Political Science”, American Political Science Review,  Vol. 100, No. 4, Nov., 627-635.

J. Druckman and C. Kam, “Students as Experimental Participants:  A Defense of the  ‘Narrow Data Base,’” in Druckman et al., eds., Handbook of Experimental Political Science

11.     Estudos Experimentais 2 – Experimentos Naturais e de Campo (25/08)

THAD, Dunning,. 2012. Natural and Field Experiments in the Study of Latin American Politics. In Peter Kingstone and Deborah Yashar, eds., Routledge Handbook of Latin American Politics. Routledge (Taylor & Francis).

K. Imai, L. Keele, D. Tingley, and T. Yamamoto, “Unpacking the Black Box of Causality:  Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies,” American Political Science Review, 2011, pp. 765-789

Discussão:

Cepaluni, Gabriel, and F. Daniel Hidalgo. 2016. “Compulsory Voting Can Increase Political Inequality: Evidence from Brazil.” Political Analysis 24(2): 273–80.

Complementar:

THAD, Dunning,. Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Yale University Press, 2012. Chapters 1, & 2

GERBER, Alan S. and Donald P GREEN. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis and Interpretation. W.W. Norton & Company, 2012. Chs. 1-2.

12.     Finalização da disciplina:

Comentários gerais e discussão dos projetos (01/09) -- REMOTO

https://conferenciaweb.rnp.br/sala/ivan-26