PPU409 – Comportamento Pró-social e Políticas públicas

Ementa: A disciplina introduz o conceito de comportamento pró-social, entendido como ações voluntárias que promovem o bem-estar de outros indivíduos, e examina suas bases psicológicas, sociológicas e econômicas, bem como sua relação com as políticas públicas. O curso explora as motivações que levam os indivíduos a adotar práticas pró-sociais, como doação para organizações sociais, voluntariado, doação de sangue e órgãos, entre outras, e analisa as implicações dessas ações para o desenho e implementação de políticas públicas.

As leituras contemplam os fatores individuais, inter-relacionais e coletivos que influenciam o comportamento pró-social, com especial atenção a temas como distribuição de renda, desigualdades socioeconômicas, ideologia, gênero e raça. Além disso, a disciplina discute os desafios da governança contemporânea diante da retração do Estado social e da crescente privatização das políticas de bem-estar e cuidado.

Objetivo: Desenvolver uma compreensão crítica e multidimensional sobre as bases psicológicas, sociológicas e econômicas do comportamento pró-social, capacitando os alunos a analisar fenômenos sociais contemporâneos, como desigualdade socioeconômica, sustentabilidade e justiça social. O curso também busca instrumentalizar os alunos para aplicar teorias relevantes na avaliação de práticas pró-sociais e suas implicações para políticas públicas e governança.

Sala remota: https://conferenciaweb.rnp.br/ufabc/ppu-409 

Google Drive: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1WHuJB-HMz-9qp426fSEHi8k4ScSZG4e5?usp=sharing

Leituras: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1evcXkVNz9DFd5A_zx3GimwbwRrBRfgbVL9HFHkHxmIE/edit?usp=sharing

Entrega dos trabalhos: 01/08/2025

Programa

Aula 1  - Apresentação do Programa - 10/02

Aula 2 - O conceito de Comportamento Pró-social  - 17/02

Penner, Louis A., John F. Dovidio, Jane A. Piliavin, and David A. Schroeder. 2005. “Prosocial Behavior: Multilevel Perspectives.” Annual Review of Psychology 56 (Volume 56, 2005): 365–92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141.

Schroeder, David A., and William G. Graziano. 2015. “The Field of Prosocial Behavior: An Introduction and Overview.” In The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior, edited by David A. Schroeder and William G. Graziano, 0. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.32.

Simpson, Brent, and Robb Willer. 2015. “Beyond Altruism: Sociological Foundations of Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior.” Annual Review of Sociology 41 (Volume 41, 2015): 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112242.

Complementar:

Pfattheicher, Stefan, Yngwie Asbjørn Nielsen, and Isabel Thielmann. 2022. “Prosocial Behavior and Altruism: A Review of Concepts and Definitions.” Current Opinion in Psychology 44 (April):124–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.021.

Aula 3 - As motivações para a doação - 24/02 (aula remota)

Bekkers, R.H.F.P., and P. Wiepking. 2011. “Who Gives? A Literature Review of Predictors of Charitable Giving. I – Religion, Education, Age, and Socialization.” Voluntary Sector Review 2 (3): 337–65. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080511x6087712.

Wiepking, Pamala, and René Bekkers. 2012. “Who Gives? A Literature Review of Predictors of Charitable Giving. Part Two: Gender, Family Composition and Income.” Voluntary Sector Review 3 (2): 217–45. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080512X649379.

Ottoni-Wilhelm, Mark, and Lise Vesterlund. 2023. “Motives to Give in Economics and Psychology: A Step toward Unification.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 216 (December):354–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2023.09.018.

Aula 4 -  Doação (Monetária) e Renda - 10/03

Hargaden, Enda P., and Nicolas J. Duquette. 2023. “The U-Shaped Charitable-Giving Curve.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, August, 08997640231189451. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640231189451.

Neumayr, Michaela, and Astrid Pennerstorfer. 2021. “The Relation Between Income and Donations as a Proportion of Income Revisited: Literature Review and Empirical Application.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 50 (3): 551–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020977667.

Jancso Fabiani, Paula Maria de, Marcos Paulo de Lucca Silveira, and Flavio Pinheiro. 2024. “Income and Money Donation in Middle-Income Countries: Evidence from Brazil.” Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing 29 (2): e1862. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1862.

Aula 5 – Doação (Monetária) entre Indivíduos de Baixa Renda - 17/03  (aula remota)

Andreoni, James, Nikos Nikiforakis, and Jan Stoop. 2021. “Higher Socioeconomic Status Does Not Predict Decreased Prosocial Behavior in a Field Experiment.” Nature Communications 12 (1): 4266. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24519-5.

Piff, Paul K., Michael W. Kraus, Stéphane Côté, Bonnie Hayden Cheng, and Dacher Keltner. 2010. “Having Less, Giving More: The Influence of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99 (5): 771–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020092.

Elbæk, Christian T., Panagiotis Mitkidis, Lene Aarøe, and Tobias Otterbring. 2023. “Subjective Socioeconomic Status and Income Inequality Are Associated with Self-Reported Morality across 67 Countries.” Nature Communications 14 (1): 5453. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41007-0.

Aula 6 -  Desigualdade e o Comportamento pró-social (Parte 1) - 24/03

Wiepking, Pamala, and Beth Breeze. 2012. “Feeling Poor, Acting Stingy: The Effect of Money Perceptions on Charitable Giving.” International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 17 (1): 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.415.

Côté, Stéphane, Julian House, and Robb Willer. 2015. “High Economic Inequality Leads Higher-Income Individuals to Be Less Generous.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (52): 15838–43. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511536112.

Duquette, Nicolas J., and Enda P. Hargaden. 2021. “Inequality and Giving.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 186 (June):189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.03.030.

Aula 7 - Desigualdade e o Comportamento Pró-social (Parte 2) -  31/03  (aula remota)

Suss, Joel H. 2023. “Higher Income Individuals Are More Generous When Local Economic Inequality Is High.” PLOS ONE 18 (6): e0286273. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286273.

Yang, Yongzheng, and Sara Konrath. 2023. “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Economic Inequality and Prosocial Behaviour.” Nature Human Behaviour 7 (11): 1899–1916. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01681-y.

Aula 8 - Ideologia e Comportamento Pró-social   -  14/04

Hoenig, Laura C., Ruthie Pliskin, and Carsten K. W. De Dreu. 2023. “Political Ideology and Moral Dilemmas in Public Good Provision.” Scientific Reports 13 (1): 2519. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29512-0.

Margolis, Michele F., and Michael W. Sances. 2017. “Partisan Differences in Nonpartisan Activity: The Case of Charitable Giving.” Political Behavior 39 (4): 839–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9382-4.

Yang, Yongzheng, and Peixu Liu. 2021. “Are Conservatives More Charitable than Liberals in the U.S.? A Meta-Analysis of Political Ideology and Charitable Giving.” Social Science Research 99 (September):102598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102598.

Aula 9 - Gênero e Raça e Comportamento Pró-social - 28/04  (aula remota)

Andreoni, James, and Lise Vesterlund. 2001. “Which Is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism*.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (1): 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556419.

Baldassarri, Delia, and Maria Abascal. 2020. “Diversity and Prosocial Behavior.” Science 369 (6508): 1183–87. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb2432.

Saucier, Donald A. 2015. “Race and Prosocial Behavior.” In The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior, edited by David A. Schroeder and William G. Graziano, 0. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.019.

Wiepking, Pamala, Christopher J. Einolf, and Yongzheng Yang. 2023. “The Gendered Pathways Into Giving and Volunteering: Similar or Different Across Countries?” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 52 (1): 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640211057408.

Aula 10 - Doação de Material Biológico - 05/05

Graf, Caroline, Bianca Suanet, Pamala Wiepking, and Eva-Maria Merz. 2024. “How Public Trust and Healthcare Quality Relate to Blood Donation Behavior: Cross-Cultural Evidence.” Journal of Health Psychology 29 (1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053231175809.

Mossialos, Elias, Joan Costa-Font, and Caroline Rudisill. 2008. “Does Organ Donation Legislation Affect Individuals’ Willingness to Donate Their Own or Their Relative’s Organs? Evidence from European Union Survey Data.” BMC Health Services Research 8 (1): 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-48.

Thorpe, Rachel, Barbara Masser, Sarah P. Coundouris, Melissa K. Hyde, Sarah P. Kruse, and Tanya E. Davison. 2024. “The Health Impacts of Blood Donation: A Systematic Review of Donor and Non-Donor Perceptions.” Blood Transfusion 22 (1): 7–19. https://doi.org/10.2450/BloodTransfus.494.

Aula 11 - Literatura Emergente no Brasil  - 12/05  (aula remota)

Andretti, Bernardo, Yan Vieites, Larissa Elmor, and Eduardo B. Andrade. 2024. “How Socioeconomic Status Shapes Food Preferences and Perceptions.” Journal of Marketing, October, 00222429241296048. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429241296048.

Vieites, Yan, Claudio M. Ferreira, Rafael Goldszmidt, and Eduardo B. Andrade. 2024. “Stigmatizing Deferrals Disproportionally Reduce Donor Return Rates: Evidence from Brazil.” Vox Sanguinis 119 (6): 606–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.13607.

Vieites, Yan, and Chiraag Mittal. 2024. “How Low Socioeconomic Status Hinders Organ Donation: An Extended Self Account.” Journal of Consumer Research, October. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucae062.